Skip to Abundance content

World Wealthiest Country · Abundance history

Panama 🇵🇦 · Country History

Movement in the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, measured through access to life rather than GDP or money. Every archived point adjustment and source remains available; unchanged observations are condensed by date, not deleted.

World Wealthiest Country · Recorded rank history

62 meaningful rank/score point(s)
Recorded period 1 of 62: rank 118. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 62: rank 119. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 62: rank 119. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 62: rank 120. 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500 – 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 62: rank 119. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 62: rank 120. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 62: rank 119. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 62: rank 118. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 62: rank 119. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 62: rank 118. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 62: rank 117. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 62: rank 116. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 62: rank 115. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 62: rank 114. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 62: rank 113. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 62: rank 114. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 62: rank 115. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 62: rank 114. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 62: rank 115. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 62: rank 142. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 62: rank 141. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 62: rank 140. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 62: rank 139. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 62: rank 138. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 62: rank 137. 17 Oct 2026 · 03:54 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 62: rank 136. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 62: rank 135. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 62: rank 134. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 62: rank 133. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 62: rank 132. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 62: rank 131. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 62: rank 130. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 62: rank 129. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 62: rank 128. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 62: rank 127. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 62: rank 126. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 62: rank 125. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 62: rank 124. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 62: rank 123. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 62: rank 122. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 62: rank 121. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 62: rank 120. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 62: rank 119. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 62: rank 118. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 45 of 62: rank 117. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 46 of 62: rank 116. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 47 of 62: rank 115. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 48 of 62: rank 114. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 49 of 62: rank 113. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 50 of 62: rank 112. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 51 of 62: rank 111. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 52 of 62: rank 110. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 53 of 62: rank 109. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 54 of 62: rank 108. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 55 of 62: rank 106. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 56 of 62: rank 105. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 57 of 62: rank 104. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 58 of 62: rank 114. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 59 of 62: rank 123. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 60 of 62: rank 126. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 61 of 62: rank 134. 21 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500Recorded period 62 of 62: rank 135. 21 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500NOW #135Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

National score over the same dates

The rank can hold while points move. This chart shows only actually recorded score readings; its vertical scale follows the visible minimum and maximum.

-61.39 · 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500-61.39 · 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500-61.39 · 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500-61.39 · 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500-61.39 · 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500-61.39 · 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500-61.39 · 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500-61.39 · 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500-61.39 · 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500-61.39 · 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500-62.15 · 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500-62.15 · 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500-62.15 · 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500-62.15 · 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500-62.15 · 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500-62.15 · 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500-62.15 · 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500-64.97 · 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500-64.97 · 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500-64.97 · 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500-64.97 · 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500-64.97 · 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500-64.97 · 17 Oct 2026 · 03:54 GMT-0500-64.97 · 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500-64.97 · 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500-64.97 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-64.97 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-64.97 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-64.97 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-64.97 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-64.97 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-64.97 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-64.97 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-64.97 · 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500-64.97 · 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500-64.97 · 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500-64.97 · 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500-64.97 · 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500-64.97 · 21 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500-64.97 · 21 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500-61.39-64.97Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dots mark initial readings and rank or score changes; unchanged readings extend a dated interval. Select a dot for the score and related archived events.

Selected rank observation

Ranking changed

Recorded rank movement.

Rank#134 → #135National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Peer identities were not stored for this older rank event; missing before/after rankings cannot be reconstructed.

Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved down from #134 to #135 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#134 → #135National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

No peer crossing can be confirmed from the two archived ranking snapshots.

Every recorded change

Each archived event is preserved. Category details and sources begin from the first detailed country snapshot; older records remain visible without invented comparisons.

Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #122 to #121 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#122 → #121National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. San Marino #3 → #236

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (1)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #123 to #121 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#123 → #121National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (2)

  1. San Marino #4 → #236; points -47.91 → -47.91
  2. Tokelau #2 → #241

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (1)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #123 to #122 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#123 → #122National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Tokelau #2 → #241

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (1)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #124 to #123 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#124 → #123National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Brunei #15 → #220; points -50.29 → -50.29

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (1)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #125 to #124 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#125 → #124National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Mauritius #74 → #231

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (1)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #126 to #125 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#126 → #125National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Namibia #124 → #234

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #127 to #126 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#127 → #126National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Rwanda #113 → #238

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #127 to #126 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#127 → #126National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Rwanda #113 → #238; points -63.72 → -63.72

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #128 to #127 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#128 → #127National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Italy #34 → #230

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #129 to #128 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#129 → #128National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. North Macedonia #86 → #238; points -59.97 → -59.97

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #130 to #129 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#130 → #129National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Moldova #103 → #236

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #130 to #129 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#130 → #129National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Moldova #103 → #236; points -61.81 → -61.81

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #131 to #130 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#131 → #130National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Botswana #113 → #231

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #131 to #130 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#131 → #130National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Botswana #113 → #231; points -62.99 → -62.99

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #132 to #131 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#132 → #131National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Kyrgyzstan #131 → #236

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #133 to #132 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#133 → #132National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Mongolia #129 → #238; points -64.72 → -64.72

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #134 to #133 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#134 → #133National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. South Korea #116 → #240

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #134 to #133 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#134 → #133National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. South Korea #116 → #240

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #135 to #134 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#135 → #134National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Japan #105 → #240

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #135 to #134 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#135 → #134National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Japan #105 → #240

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #136 to #135 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#136 → #135National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Russia #77 → #149; points -59.04 → -66.52

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #137 to #136 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#137 → #136National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. China #122 → #172; points -63.75 → -68.85

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #138 to #137 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#138 → #137National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Sri Lanka #119 → #170; points -63.30 → -68.27

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #139 to #138 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#139 → #138National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Cambodia #136 → #154; points -64.77 → -64.77

This older event recorded only one side of the movement. Other crossing countries were not archived and cannot be reliably named.

Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #140 to #139 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#140 → #139National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Tunisia #118 → #141; points -62.67 → -62.67

This older event recorded only one side of the movement. Other crossing countries were not archived and cannot be reliably named.

Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #141 to #140 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#141 → #140National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Jordan #135 → #150; points -64.61 → -64.61

This older event recorded only one side of the movement. Other crossing countries were not archived and cannot be reliably named.

Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #142 to #141 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#142 → #141National score-64.97 → -64.97

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Azerbaijan #91 → #142; points -60.06 → -60.06

This older event recorded only one side of the movement. Other crossing countries were not archived and cannot be reliably named.

Full country evidence and Money Gate rescan

GDP 80–99 full category-documentation pass: 16/16 categories and 5/5 Money Gates reviewed; historic scoring retained where evidence insufficient to revise; 2024 WITS HS3915 only a material-transfer indicator, not illegal dumping proof.

National points: -62.15 → -64.97; Rank: #115 → #142

Durability, Repair & Material Return

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score17.2517.25

Category point adjustment: 0.00 category points

The evidence explanation changed; the category score stayed the same.

Updated reasoning

Completed category-level audit. Original score and four rails retained; original summary: Panama’s waste authority promotes source separation and recycling campaigns, but national material recovery remains fragmented and disposal continues to dominate many waste streams. Category-relevant indicator: Ambient PM2.5 exposure — not a measure of material durability. The source is not evidence of universal free services; score is a TBF ordinal judgement. Evidence-year and subnational gaps are detailed in the attached audit.

Earlier reasoning

Live-reviewed Panama standalone score under Category Method 0.0.1. Overall Gate 0.6.0 is applied after domestic evidence aggregation.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (1)

Education & Human Capability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score44.7544.75

Category point adjustment: 0.00 category points

The evidence explanation changed; the category score stayed the same.

Updated reasoning

Completed category-level audit. Original score and four rails retained; original summary: Panama maintains nationwide public education and in 2025 expanded school infrastructure and food support; quality and territorial gaps remain important in rural and indigenous areas. Category-relevant indicator: Primary education completion. The source is not evidence of universal free services; score is a TBF ordinal judgement. Evidence-year and subnational gaps are detailed in the attached audit.

Earlier reasoning

Live-reviewed Panama standalone score under Category Method 0.0.1. Overall Gate 0.6.0 is applied after domestic evidence aggregation.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (1)

Energy & Household Capability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score48.5048.50

Category point adjustment: 0.00 category points

The evidence explanation changed; the category score stayed the same.

Updated reasoning

Completed category-level audit. Original score and four rails retained; original summary: Panama has near-universal electricity access in urban areas and a diversified power system, while remote communities remain harder to serve and household capability still depends on paid utility service. Category-relevant indicator: Access to electricity. The source is not evidence of universal free services; score is a TBF ordinal judgement. Evidence-year and subnational gaps are detailed in the attached audit.

Earlier reasoning

Live-reviewed Panama standalone score under Category Method 0.0.1. Overall Gate 0.6.0 is applied after domestic evidence aggregation.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (1)

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score—0.25
Base category score—0.25
Research coverage (%)—100.00
Category weight (%)—6.00
Positive Contribution (25%)—10.00
Mutuality / Local Benefit (25%)—5.00
Documented Harm / Extraction (35%)—-10.00
Accountability / Repair (15%)—-5.00
Updated reasoning

International Footprint v3.1: 25% contribution+25% local mutuality+20% other harm/repair+15% exporter+15% importer. Plastic scrap HS3915 2024 export=4563060 kg, import=64881 kg. No reported volume is NOT treated as proof of zero trade; unknown role has neutral 0 provisional. The fourth visible rail shows (exporter+importer)/2. No second waste deduction.

Sources archived after the change (1)

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score31.0031.00

Category point adjustment: 0.00 category points

The evidence explanation changed; the category score stayed the same.

Updated reasoning

Completed category-level audit. Original score and four rails retained; original summary: UN demographic reporting places Panama’s fertility near or below replacement in 2025, showing that strong economic growth does not automatically remove family-formation pressures. Category-relevant indicator: Total fertility rate. The source is not evidence of universal free services; score is a TBF ordinal judgement. Evidence-year and subnational gaps are detailed in the attached audit.

Earlier reasoning

Live-reviewed Panama standalone score under Category Method 0.0.1. Overall Gate 0.6.0 is applied after domestic evidence aggregation.

Sources archived before (2)
Sources archived after the change (2)

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score28.0028.00

Category point adjustment: 0.00 category points

The evidence explanation changed; the category score stayed the same.

Updated reasoning

Completed category-level audit. Original score and four rails retained; original summary: MEDUCA reported more than 104,723 students benefiting from the 2025 School Lunch Programme across all 16 education regions. This is meaningful zero-money food reach, but household meals remain principally purchased. Category-relevant indicator: Prevalence of undernourishment — food access. The source is not evidence of universal free services; score is a TBF ordinal judgement. Evidence-year and subnational gaps are detailed in the attached audit.

Earlier reasoning

Live-reviewed Panama standalone score under Category Method 0.0.1. Overall Gate 0.6.0 is applied after domestic evidence aggregation.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (1)

Health & Care Reach

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score36.2536.25

Category point adjustment: 0.00 category points

The evidence explanation changed; the category score stayed the same.

Updated reasoning

Completed category-level audit. Original score and four rails retained; original summary: MINSA and the Social Security Fund advanced integration in 2025 under a universal-coverage objective. Remote indigenous areas still require long travel, prompting new medicine-delivery and community-health technologies. Category-relevant indicator: Universal health coverage service index. The source is not evidence of universal free services; score is a TBF ordinal judgement. Evidence-year and subnational gaps are detailed in the attached audit.

Earlier reasoning

Live-reviewed Panama standalone score under Category Method 0.0.1. Overall Gate 0.6.0 is applied after domestic evidence aggregation.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (1)

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score26.7526.75

Category point adjustment: 0.00 category points

The evidence explanation changed; the category score stayed the same.

Updated reasoning

Completed category-level audit. Original score and four rails retained; original summary: Panama’s multidimensional-poverty reporting shows progress between 2022 and 2025 while continuing to identify housing and service deprivation in poorer and indigenous areas. Category-relevant indicator: Population living in slums — urban housing constraint. The source is not evidence of universal free services; score is a TBF ordinal judgement. Evidence-year and subnational gaps are detailed in the attached audit.

Earlier reasoning

Live-reviewed Panama standalone score under Category Method 0.0.1. Overall Gate 0.6.0 is applied after domestic evidence aggregation.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (1)

Human Time & Burden Return

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score21.0021.00

Category point adjustment: 0.00 category points

The evidence explanation changed; the category score stayed the same.

Updated reasoning

Method 3.1 full 4-rail pass. 25% capacity + 35% reach + 25% paid work friction + 15% usable family time. Baseline capacity/reach preserved. Dated country-specific time evidence only where available; otherwise prior authored judgement retained.

Earlier reasoning

Live-reviewed Panama standalone score under Category Method 0.0.1. Overall Gate 0.6.0 is applied after domestic evidence aggregation.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (1)

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score—17.25
Base category score—17.25
Research coverage (%)—100.00
Category weight (%)—6.00
Entry Accessibility (25%)—20.00
Migrant Practical Life (30%)—30.00
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome (25%)—10.00
Flexibility / Continuity (20%)—-5.00
Updated reasoning

Four assessed rails: lawful entry; protection/residency; family continuity; cross-border accessibility. TBF authored assessments. A country immigration authority or UNHCR country document is authoritative for particular mechanisms, not all visa nationalities and fees.

Sources archived after the change (1)

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score25.0025.00

Category point adjustment: 0.00 category points

The evidence explanation changed; the category score stayed the same.

Updated reasoning

Completed category-level audit. Original score and four rails retained; original summary: Panama ranked 73rd of 143 countries in the 2025 WJP Rule of Law Index, showing functioning institutions alongside persistent corruption, enforcement and justice-access friction. Category-relevant indicator: Intentional homicide rate — narrow safety proxy. The source is not evidence of universal free services; score is a TBF ordinal judgement. Evidence-year and subnational gaps are detailed in the attached audit.

Earlier reasoning

Live-reviewed Panama standalone score under Category Method 0.0.1. Overall Gate 0.6.0 is applied after domestic evidence aggregation.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (1)

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score24.0024.00

Category point adjustment: 0.00 category points

The evidence explanation changed; the category score stayed the same.

Updated reasoning

Completed category-level audit. Original score and four rails retained; original summary: Panama has large physical land and low national density, but valuable urban and canal-zone land is market allocated while indigenous and rural communities face service and tenure inequalities. Category-relevant indicator: Agricultural land share — not proof of no-fee land access. The source is not evidence of universal free services; score is a TBF ordinal judgement. Evidence-year and subnational gaps are detailed in the attached audit.

Earlier reasoning

Live-reviewed Panama standalone score under Category Method 0.0.1. Overall Gate 0.6.0 is applied after domestic evidence aggregation.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (1)

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score54.5054.50

Category point adjustment: 0.00 category points

The evidence explanation changed; the category score stayed the same.

Updated reasoning

Completed category-level audit. Original score and four rails retained; original summary: MiAmbiente expanded conservation partnerships, protected areas, biological corridors and ranger capacity through 2025–26, while forest, marine and climate pressures remain. Category-relevant indicator: Forest area — one ecological resilience proxy. The source is not evidence of universal free services; score is a TBF ordinal judgement. Evidence-year and subnational gaps are detailed in the attached audit.

Earlier reasoning

Live-reviewed Panama standalone score under Category Method 0.0.1. Overall Gate 0.6.0 is applied after domestic evidence aggregation.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (1)

Mobility & Reachability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score30.0030.00

Category point adjustment: 0.00 category points

The evidence explanation changed; the category score stayed the same.

Updated reasoning

Completed category-level audit. Original score and four rails retained; original summary: Panama City’s metro and bus systems create high-capacity public mobility, while fares, long commutes and weak rural connectivity keep travel behind recurring payment and geography. Category-relevant indicator: Paved road network share — partial mobility proxy. The source is not evidence of universal free services; score is a TBF ordinal judgement. Evidence-year and subnational gaps are detailed in the attached audit.

Earlier reasoning

Live-reviewed Panama standalone score under Category Method 0.0.1. Overall Gate 0.6.0 is applied after domestic evidence aggregation.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (1)

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score42.5042.50

Category point adjustment: 0.00 category points

The evidence explanation changed; the category score stayed the same.

Updated reasoning

Completed category-level audit. Original score and four rails retained; original summary: Panama maintains 18 national parks and a large protected-area network, giving people substantial access to tropical forests, coasts and biodiversity outside commercial entertainment. Category-relevant indicator: Homicides per 100,000 — safety proxy, not public delight. The source is not evidence of universal free services; score is a TBF ordinal judgement. Evidence-year and subnational gaps are detailed in the attached audit.

Earlier reasoning

Live-reviewed Panama standalone score under Category Method 0.0.1. Overall Gate 0.6.0 is applied after domestic evidence aggregation.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (1)

Water & Sanitation Abundance

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score41.0041.00

Category point adjustment: 0.00 category points

The evidence explanation changed; the category score stayed the same.

Updated reasoning

Completed category-level audit. Original score and four rails retained; original summary: Panama has extensive urban water and sanitation infrastructure, but rural and indigenous territories continue to face weaker dependable access, making geography a major reach constraint. Category-relevant indicator: Basic drinking water service access. The source is not evidence of universal free services; score is a TBF ordinal judgement. Evidence-year and subnational gaps are detailed in the attached audit.

Earlier reasoning

Live-reviewed Panama standalone score under Category Method 0.0.1. Overall Gate 0.6.0 is applied after domestic evidence aggregation.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (1)
Sources archived with this rescan (65)
Category and evidence update

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome changed from pending to 17.25. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score—17.25
Base category score—17.25
Research coverage (%)—100.00
Category weight (%)—6.00
Entry Accessibility (25%)—20.00
Migrant Practical Life (30%)—30.00
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome (25%)—10.00
Flexibility / Continuity (20%)—-5.00
Updated reasoning

Four assessed rails: lawful entry; protection/residency; family continuity; cross-border accessibility. TBF authored assessments. A country immigration authority or UNHCR country document is authoritative for particular mechanisms, not all visa nationalities and fees.

Sources archived after the change (1)
Category and evidence update

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct changed from pending to 0.25. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score—0.25
Base category score—0.25
Research coverage (%)—100.00
Category weight (%)—6.00
Positive Contribution (25%)—10.00
Mutuality / Local Benefit (25%)—5.00
Documented Harm / Extraction (35%)—-10.00
Accountability / Repair (15%)—-5.00
Updated reasoning

International Footprint v3.1: 25% contribution+25% local mutuality+20% other harm/repair+15% exporter+15% importer. Plastic scrap HS3915 2024 export=4563060 kg, import=64881 kg. No reported volume is NOT treated as proof of zero trade; unknown role has neutral 0 provisional. The fourth visible rail shows (exporter+importer)/2. No second waste deduction.

Sources archived after the change (1)

Load at the Speed of Light

Add App 🚀
×
Princess Keilah Studio