Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile
Kazakhstan 🇰🇿
Kazakhstan currently ranks #114 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -62.80. This country is money-gated (1.75/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Energy and weakest in External Footprint across 16 evidence categories.
Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.
Country profile & diagnostic reading
Data updatedEvidence through 10 Oct 2026How the headline score is calculated
Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.
Current evidence: +36.8 · Money Gate: 1.75/20 · Headline: -62.8.
The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.
TBF Rank TBF Rank Rank compares only published profiles. It follows the TBF Abundance Score, not GDP or money size, and can move when a country score changes or when another country enters the published table. Read Small Island Abundance Theory Challenge a score or supply new evidenceHeads of state, authorized representatives and evidence holders may submit documentation and request recalculation. A review never silently overwrites the previous rank or scoring record.Appeal Kazakhstan's score or request recalculation →
Global standing based on life reachability
243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries
KazakhstanLast recorded move: up from #120 to #114.Recent recorded movements
- #120 → #11421 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500
- #121 → #12012 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500
- #120 → #12112 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500
- #121 → #12012 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500
Rank journey · newest first
Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.
Research Coverage Research coverage Coverage reports the weighted share of categories with documented scoring and supporting source records. 100% means all category scoring slots have been assessed; it does not guarantee that every claim has been independently measured or that every family has no-payment access. Read the source and evidence limitations for each point. Explore Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
Coverage calculation
Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:
9.0 × 80.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 76.0% + 6.0 × 80.0% = 95.56% weighted coverage
Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.
Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.
14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored
GDP and money rank GDP and money rank GDP and money rank are context only. They track monetized production, not how freely people access life, and contribute zero points to TBF Abundance. Read Make the World Truly Productive Again
GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking
Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0
Five basics stand between this country and zero The zero-line rule All five basics must reach 4/4 before a country can cross zero. Open any gate reading to see exactly why its points were assigned and review the source record. Reach-to-Money-Gate Clearance 2.0 These five gates measure effective no-payment access, not installed capacity alone. Under new source-backed reviews, 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 points track verified free access to 0%, some but less than 30%, 30%+, 50%+, 75%+ and 100% of the population respectively. The higher levels require reliable real use; 4/4 requires universally accessible, reliable service without ordinary charges or exclusions. Missing population figures remain pending. Older gate points remain archived until re-audited.
Food Food · 4 points Full credit means nutritious food is ordinary civilization provision without a checkout or poverty test. School meals and other narrow institutional routes can earn limited partial credit without being mistaken for free food abundance. Read A Civilization Laid Out in Orchards
Why 0.5 / 4?
Government provides free hot meals for primary pupils and vulnerable students; this is meaningful institutional credit, not free household food.
Point calculation
0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Housing / Land Housing / Land · 4 points Full credit means families can secure a home or suitable productive ground without rent, purchase price or mortgage debt deciding whether they may remain sheltered and grounded. Read the Distributed Founding Nuclei Strategy
Why 0.0 / 4?
Housing support may be subsidised or preferential, but no national no-payment family-land or housing entitlement was substantiated in the reviewed evidence.
Point calculation
0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Healthcare Healthcare · 4 points Full credit requires dependable no-payment care across prevention, primary care, maternity, dentistry, medicine, emergency treatment and necessary specialist care. Read Money Zombie Outbreaks
Why 1.3 / 4?
State-guaranteed medical services supply a defined benefit package but insurance and covered-service conditions prevent a universal 4-point no-charge finding.
Point calculation
1.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 31.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Transportation Transportation · 4 points Full credit means ordinary movement is free across the routes people actually need. A free Sunday, one route or a temporary promotion earns only limited credit. Read The Caterport: Free Human Movement
Why 0.0 / 4?
Transport usually operates with fares, and no general no-fare travel guarantee is documented.
Point calculation
0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Water / Energy Water / Energy · 4 points Full credit requires both safe water and essential household energy to stay available without payment deciding whether cooking, cooling, washing, pumping or food preservation stops. Read Nucleus Formation Stewards
Why 0.0 / 4?
Water and energy connections and support are distinct from a national no-payment entitlement; no such general route was demonstrated.
Point calculation
0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
- Food0.5 / 4
- Housing / Land0.0 / 4
- Healthcare1.3 / 4
- Transportation0.0 / 4
- Water / Energy0.0 / 4
- Money still needed18.3 / 20
Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.
Why 1.8 / 20?
The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.
Actual calculation
Food 0.50 + Housing / Land 0.00 + Healthcare 1.25 + Transportation 0.00 + Water / Energy 0.00 = 1.75 / 20
A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.
Why 72.0 / 100?
Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.
Actual calculation
(100 - -43.92) ÷ 2 = 71.96 / 100
The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.
Why -45.6?
Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.
Actual calculation
-50 + 2.5 × 1.75 = -45.6
16-category profile
All categories at a glance
All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.
Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.
Category readings & evidence
Open any category for the full diagnostic reading
9% weight
Human Time & Burden Return
What this category measures
Whether productivity, infrastructure and institutions return usable lifetime to people and families.
TBFC targetNecessary contribution should not require people to sell most of their waking life merely to retain access to food, shelter, care and ordinary family life. Access-gate research questionHow much paid work or income-producing activity is required before an ordinary household can keep access to basic life, and what usable family time remains afterward? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Family Shubaka: protecting human and family time
-63.4↓Money-gated · Evidence +34.5
Money-gated · Evidence +34.5
Score breakdown
Human Time & Burden Return
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points
Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.1 × 25% = -13.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Kazakhstan reports 39 hours of actual weekly main-job work per employed person in 2025 (41 for employees). Work at second jobs and household duties is not included in that figure.
Kazakhstan combines low headline unemployment with an average 39 actual hours at the main job. The evidence supports meaningful productive access without treating employment itself as returned family time.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points
Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.1 × 35% = -19.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, unemployment rate: 4.50 percent
For Kazakhstan, employment-to-population ratio age 15+: 64.30 percent
For Kazakhstan, self-employed share of employed population: 22.80 percent
Exact point calculation
-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points
Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.0; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Kazakhstan reports 39 hours of actual weekly main-job work per employed person in 2025 (41 for employees). Work at second jobs and household duties is not included in that figure.
Kazakhstan combines low headline unemployment with an average 39 actual hours at the main job. The evidence supports meaningful productive access without treating employment itself as returned family time.
Kazakhstan combines low headline unemployment with an average 39 actual hours at the main job. The evidence supports meaningful productive access without treating employment itself as returned family time.
Kazakhstan combines low headline unemployment with an average 39 actual hours at the main job. The evidence supports meaningful productive access without treating employment itself as returned family time.
Exact point calculation
20.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.00 weighted points
Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -67.4 × 15% = -10.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, youth neither in employment nor education/training: 5.80 percent
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +34.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +34.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.4.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 16.25 + 22.75 + -7.50 + 3.00 = 34.50
Base: 34.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +34.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 34.50 × (9.00 × 80.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 2.60 points
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 80% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.20%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: 0.0
What the evidence found
Kazakhstan reports 39 hours of actual weekly main-job work per employed person in 2025 (41 for employees). Work at second jobs and household duties is not included in that figure.
2025-12-31 Kazakhstan Bureau of National Statistics, labour market 2025Kazakhstan combines low headline unemployment with an average 39 actual hours at the main job. The evidence supports meaningful productive access without treating employment itself as returned family time.
Bureau of National Statistics of KazakhstanKazakhstan combines low headline unemployment with an average 39 actual hours at the main job. The evidence supports meaningful productive access without treating employment itself as returned family time.
Bureau of National Statistics of KazakhstanKazakhstan combines low headline unemployment with an average 39 actual hours at the main job. The evidence supports meaningful productive access without treating employment itself as returned family time.
Bureau of National Statistics of KazakhstanPublished indicators
Bureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2026
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2026
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2026
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2026
Source
8% weight
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
What this category measures
Whether adequate shelter physically exists and actually reaches people without excessive cost, exclusion or vacancy mismatch.
TBFC targetAdequate family shelter should remain reachable without lifetime dependence on rent, mortgage debt or ability to pay. Access-gate research questionWhat share of ordinary shelter access depends on rent, mortgage debt, purchase price or other recurring payment, and what dependable non-market routes exist at national scale? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Mother-Sight compound home
-62.8↓Money-gated · Evidence +36.8
Money-gated · Evidence +36.8
Score breakdown
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.8 × 25% = -13.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, total housing stock area: 447.27 million square metres
For Kazakhstan, housing area per resident: 25.10 square metres per person
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points
Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.1 × 35% = -19.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, housing stock equipped with water supply: 98.00 percent
For Kazakhstan, housing stock equipped with sewerage: 79.00 percent
Exact point calculation
-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points
Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -82.3 × 25% = -20.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, national housing water connection is very high, but rural sewerage, central heating, central hot water and bath/shower equipment remain far below urban levels.
For Kazakhstan, national housing water connection is very high, but rural sewerage, central heating, central hot water and bath/shower equipment remain far below urban levels.
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points
Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.3 × 15% = -9.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, national housing water connection is very high, but rural sewerage, central heating, central hot water and bath/shower equipment remain far below urban levels.
For Kazakhstan, national housing water connection is very high, but rural sewerage, central heating, central hot water and bath/shower equipment remain far below urban levels.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +36.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +36.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -62.8.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 22.75 + -8.75 + 5.25 = 36.75
Base: 36.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +36.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 36.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 3.08 points
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +5.0
What the evidence found
For Kazakhstan, national housing water connection is very high, but rural sewerage, central heating, central hot water and bath/shower equipment remain far below urban levels.
Bureau of National Statistics of KazakhstanFor Kazakhstan, national housing water connection is very high, but rural sewerage, central heating, central hot water and bath/shower equipment remain far below urban levels.
Bureau of National Statistics of KazakhstanPublished indicators
Bureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
Source
9% weight
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
What this category measures
Physical food and nutrient capacity, nourishment reach, waste/loss, public edible landscapes and free food access.
TBFC targetNutritious food should exist in multiplying abundance and remain reachable even when a household has no money to spend. Access-gate research questionCan people obtain adequate nutritious food when they cannot pay, and are free/public/productive-food routes large enough to be ordinary rather than exceptional? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Complete Reordering of Earth’s Food System
-63.6↓Money-gated · Evidence +34.0
Money-gated · Evidence +34.0
Score breakdown
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
Exact point calculation
80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points
Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -51.1 × 25% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, fAO estimated 2025 cereal output at about 23 million tonnes, with wheat production about 20% above the five-year average and exports also forecast above average.
For Kazakhstan, fAO estimated 2025 cereal output at about 23 million tonnes, with wheat production about 20% above the five-year average and exports also forecast above average.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points
Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -56.5 × 35% = -19.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, children under 5 stunted: 8.00 percent
For Kazakhstan, children under 5 wasted: 5.00 percent
For Kazakhstan, per-capita beef consumption per month: 2.10 kg per person per month
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.8 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, national household statistics report food products at 52% of cash expenditure in 2025, showing that strong agricultural capacity does not remove the household money burden of nourishment.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points
Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -60.6 × 15% = -9.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, fAO estimated 2025 cereal output at about 23 million tonnes, with wheat production about 20% above the five-year average and exports also forecast above average.
For Kazakhstan, national household statistics report food products at 52% of cash expenditure in 2025, showing that strong agricultural capacity does not remove the household money burden of nourishment.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +34.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +34.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.6.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 20.00 + 21.00 + -13.75 + 6.75 = 34.00
Base: 34.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +34.0 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 34.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 3.20 points
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
For Kazakhstan, fAO estimated 2025 cereal output at about 23 million tonnes, with wheat production about 20% above the five-year average and exports also forecast above average.
FAO GIEWSFor Kazakhstan, national household statistics report food products at 52% of cash expenditure in 2025, showing that strong agricultural capacity does not remove the household money burden of nourishment.
Bureau of National Statistics of KazakhstanFor Kazakhstan, fAO estimated 2025 cereal output at about 23 million tonnes, with wheat production about 20% above the five-year average and exports also forecast above average.
FAO GIEWSPublished indicators
FAO GIEWS · 2025
SourceFAO GIEWS · 2025
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceUNICEF Kazakhstan · 2024
SourceUNICEF Kazakhstan · 2024
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
Source
6% weight
Water & Sanitation Abundance
What this category measures
Safe water, sanitation, reliability, capture, reuse, storage and living-landscape water capacity.
TBFC targetSafe water and sanitation should be dependable life infrastructure, not conditional on household purchasing power. Access-gate research questionCan households retain safe water and sanitation when income falls, and which payment, disconnection or infrastructure barriers interrupt access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
-61.3↓Money-gated · Evidence +42.3
Money-gated · Evidence +42.3
Score breakdown
Water & Sanitation Abundance
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -52.4 × 25% = -13.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, uNICEF reports 89% safely managed drinking-water access in 2022 and 98% basic sanitation, while 2024 MICS shows only 55% of the poorest households had water piped into the dwelling and annual sufficient-water availability was 85.5%.
For Kazakhstan, uNICEF reports 89% safely managed drinking-water access in 2022 and 98% basic sanitation, while 2024 MICS shows only 55% of the poorest households had water piped into the dwelling and annual sufficient-water availability was 85.5%.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points
Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -52.4 × 35% = -18.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, households using safely managed drinking water: 89.00 percent
For Kazakhstan, household members with sufficient drinking water in last month: 90.50 percent
For Kazakhstan, households with basic sanitation: 98.00 percent
Exact point calculation
-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points
Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -82.3 × 25% = -20.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, uNICEF reports 89% safely managed drinking-water access in 2022 and 98% basic sanitation, while 2024 MICS shows only 55% of the poorest households had water piped into the dwelling and annual sufficient-water availability was 85.5%.
For Kazakhstan, uNICEF reports 89% safely managed drinking-water access in 2022 and 98% basic sanitation, while 2024 MICS shows only 55% of the poorest households had water piped into the dwelling and annual sufficient-water availability was 85.5%.
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points
Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -61.9 × 15% = -9.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, uNICEF reports 89% safely managed drinking-water access in 2022 and 98% basic sanitation, while 2024 MICS shows only 55% of the poorest households had water piped into the dwelling and annual sufficient-water availability was 85.5%.
For Kazakhstan, uNICEF reports 89% safely managed drinking-water access in 2022 and 98% basic sanitation, while 2024 MICS shows only 55% of the poorest households had water piped into the dwelling and annual sufficient-water availability was 85.5%.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +42.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +42.3. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -61.3.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 26.25 + -8.75 + 6.00 = 42.25
Base: 42.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +42.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 42.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 2.65 points
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: 0.0
What the evidence found
For Kazakhstan, uNICEF reports 89% safely managed drinking-water access in 2022 and 98% basic sanitation, while 2024 MICS shows only 55% of the poorest households had water piped into the dwelling and annual sufficient-water availability was 85.5%.
UNICEF KazakhstanFor Kazakhstan, uNICEF reports 89% safely managed drinking-water access in 2022 and 98% basic sanitation, while 2024 MICS shows only 55% of the poorest households had water piped into the dwelling and annual sufficient-water availability was 85.5%.
UNICEF KazakhstanPublished indicators
UNICEF / WHO-UNICEF JMP · 2022
SourceUNICEF Kazakhstan · 2024
SourceUNICEF Kazakhstan · 2024
SourceUNICEF / WHO-UNICEF JMP · 2022
SourceUNICEF Kazakhstan · 2024
Source
5% weight
Energy & Household Capability
What this category measures
Whether usable, reliable energy reaches households and removes burdens across water, food, health, cooling, cooking and movement.
TBFC targetEssential household energy should support cooking, cooling, water, food preservation and care without money becoming the switch that turns basic capability on or off. Access-gate research questionCan households retain essential energy for cooking, cooling, water and food preservation when they cannot pay, and how often does price or disconnection reduce capability? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Solar Moon Panel
-58.5↓Money-gated · Evidence +52.8
Money-gated · Evidence +52.8
Score breakdown
Energy & Household Capability
Exact point calculation
85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points
Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 25% = -12.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, world Bank reports 100% electricity access for 2023 and the Energy Ministry reports 123.1 billion kWh generated in 2025.
For Kazakhstan, world Bank reports 100% electricity access for 2023 and the Energy Ministry reports 123.1 billion kWh generated in 2025.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
85.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 29.75 weighted points
Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 35% = -17.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, population with access to electricity: 100.00 percent
For Kazakhstan, population gasification planned level: 62.60 percent
Exact point calculation
-20.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -5.00 weighted points
Original evidence -20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -20.0; Money-gated reading -78.3 × 25% = -19.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, world Bank reports 100% electricity access for 2023 and the Energy Ministry reports 123.1 billion kWh generated in 2025.
For Kazakhstan, renewable facilities generated 8.621 billion kWh in 2025, 7% of total electricity generation excluding large hydro under the national reporting convention.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points
Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -60.6 × 15% = -9.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, renewable facilities generated 8.621 billion kWh in 2025, 7% of total electricity generation excluding large hydro under the national reporting convention.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +52.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +52.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.5.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 21.25 + 29.75 + -5.00 + 6.75 = 52.75
Base: 52.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +52.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 52.75 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 2.76 points
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: 0.0
What the evidence found
For Kazakhstan, world Bank reports 100% electricity access for 2023 and the Energy Ministry reports 123.1 billion kWh generated in 2025.
World Bank / Ministry of EnergyFor Kazakhstan, renewable facilities generated 8.621 billion kWh in 2025, 7% of total electricity generation excluding large hydro under the national reporting convention.
Ministry of Energy of KazakhstanFor Kazakhstan, world Bank reports 100% electricity access for 2023 and the Energy Ministry reports 123.1 billion kWh generated in 2025.
World Bank / Ministry of EnergyPublished indicators
World Bank · 2023
SourceMinistry of Energy of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceMinistry of Energy of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceMinistry of Energy of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceMinistry of Energy of Kazakhstan · 2025
Source
7% weight
Health & Care Reach
What this category measures
Whether prevention, primary care, medicine, maternity care, dentistry and specialist capability reach people when needed.
TBFC targetPrevention, maternity, dentistry, medicine and necessary treatment should be reachable because care is needed, not because payment can be produced. Access-gate research questionCan necessary care be obtained because it is needed, or do price, insurance, employment, debt or other financial tests materially delay or prevent access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: No Shrugging Our Shoulders at Family Suffering
-61.1↓Money-gated · Evidence +43.3
Money-gated · Evidence +43.3
Score breakdown
Health & Care Reach
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -52.4 × 25% = -13.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, wHO-derived UHC coverage is 83 for 2023 and official life expectancy reached 75.97 years in 2025.
For Kazakhstan, wHO health-financing assessment describes high population coverage and strong public funding but flags financing sustainability, equity and provider-payment issues; WHO-linked data put out-of-pocket spending at 27.64% of current health expenditure in 2023.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 1.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points
Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -52.4 × 35% = -18.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, wHO-derived UHC coverage is 83 for 2023 and official life expectancy reached 75.97 years in 2025.
For Kazakhstan, wHO-derived UHC coverage is 83 for 2023 and official life expectancy reached 75.97 years in 2025.
Exact point calculation
-40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.00 weighted points
Original evidence -40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -40.0; Money-gated reading -83.7 × 25% = -20.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, wHO health-financing assessment describes high population coverage and strong public funding but flags financing sustainability, equity and provider-payment issues; WHO-linked data put out-of-pocket spending at 27.64% of current health expenditure in 2023.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -57.9 × 15% = -8.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, life expectancy at birth: 75.97 years
For Kazakhstan, infant mortality rate: 5.84 per 1,000 live births
For Kazakhstan, maternal mortality ratio: 10.80 per 100,000 live births
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +43.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +43.3. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -61.1.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 26.25 + -10.00 + 8.25 = 43.25
Base: 43.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +43.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 43.25 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 3.17 points
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: 0.0
What the evidence found
For Kazakhstan, wHO-derived UHC coverage is 83 for 2023 and official life expectancy reached 75.97 years in 2025.
WHO / Bureau of National StatisticsFor Kazakhstan, wHO health-financing assessment describes high population coverage and strong public funding but flags financing sustainability, equity and provider-payment issues; WHO-linked data put out-of-pocket spending at 27.64% of current health expenditure in 2023.
WHO EuropeFor Kazakhstan, wHO-derived UHC coverage is 83 for 2023 and official life expectancy reached 75.97 years in 2025.
WHO / Bureau of National StatisticsPublished indicators
WHO / World Bank · 2023
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceWHO / World Bank · 2023
SourceMinistry of Health of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceMinistry of Health of Kazakhstan · 2025
Source
6% weight
Education & Human Capability
What this category measures
Foundational learning plus practical, technical and enduring civilization capability retained by people.
TBFC targetFoundational learning and useful capability should be reachable as part of civilization life rather than purchased according to family income. Access-gate research questionWhich essential learning and capability routes are genuinely reachable regardless of family income, and where do fees, debt or paid enrichment create decisive access gaps? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: What Is NoDumbDumbs?
-61.8↓Money-gated · Evidence +40.5
Money-gated · Evidence +40.5
Score breakdown
Education & Human Capability
Exact point calculation
80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points
Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -51.1 × 25% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, uNICEF’s 2024 MICS-based analysis reports net attendance of 90% in primary, 91% in lower secondary and 96% in upper secondary education.
For Kazakhstan, uNICEF’s 2024 MICS-based analysis reports net attendance of 90% in primary, 91% in lower secondary and 96% in upper secondary education.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points
Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -52.4 × 35% = -18.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, uNICEF’s 2024 MICS-based analysis reports net attendance of 90% in primary, 91% in lower secondary and 96% in upper secondary education.
OECD PISA 2022 found Kazakhstan below the OECD average in mathematics, reading and science; only 36% of students reached at least Level 2 in reading.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points
Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.0; Money-gated reading -86.4 × 25% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
OECD PISA 2022 found Kazakhstan below the OECD average in mathematics, reading and science; only 36% of students reached at least Level 2 in reading.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points
Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -60.6 × 15% = -9.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, pISA mathematics mean score: 425.00 score
For Kazakhstan, pISA reading mean score: 386.00 score
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +40.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +40.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -61.8.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 20.00 + 26.25 + -12.50 + 6.75 = 40.50
Base: 40.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +40.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 40.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 2.54 points
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +5.0
What the evidence found
For Kazakhstan, uNICEF’s 2024 MICS-based analysis reports net attendance of 90% in primary, 91% in lower secondary and 96% in upper secondary education.
UNICEF KazakhstanOECD PISA 2022 found Kazakhstan below the OECD average in mathematics, reading and science; only 36% of students reached at least Level 2 in reading.
OECDFor Kazakhstan, uNICEF’s 2024 MICS-based analysis reports net attendance of 90% in primary, 91% in lower secondary and 96% in upper secondary education.
UNICEF KazakhstanPublished indicators
UNICEF Kazakhstan · 2024
SourceUNICEF Kazakhstan · 2024
SourceUNICEF Kazakhstan · 2024
SourceOECD · 2022
SourceOECD · 2022
SourceOECD · 2022
Source
4% weight
Mobility & Reachability
What this category measures
Local, regional and national movement that connects people to family, services, work, learning and public life without consuming excessive time.
TBFC targetOrdinary local and regional movement should be available for family, care, learning and civic life without travel becoming a paywall. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary people reach family, care, learning and public life without high recurring fares, vehicle costs, debt or fuel dependence? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Caterport: Free Human Movement
-62.5↓Money-gated · Evidence +38.0
Money-gated · Evidence +38.0
Score breakdown
Mobility & Reachability
Exact point calculation
80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points
Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -51.1 × 25% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, official statistics report 1.943 billion passenger trips in 2025 and 88.9 billion passenger-km, both above 2024.
For Kazakhstan, official statistics report 1.943 billion passenger trips in 2025 and 88.9 billion passenger-km, both above 2024.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
- -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
- -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
- -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
- -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
- 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
- +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
- +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
- +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
- +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.8 × 35% = -18.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, passenger turnover: 88.90 billion passenger-km
Exact point calculation
-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points
Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.0; Money-gated reading -86.4 × 25% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, the Ministry of Internal Affairs recorded 34,146 injury/death road crashes in 2025, with 2,330 people killed and 49,220 injured.
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points
Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -61.9 × 15% = -9.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, official statistics report 1.943 billion passenger trips in 2025 and 88.9 billion passenger-km, both above 2024.
For Kazakhstan, the Ministry of Internal Affairs recorded 34,146 injury/death road crashes in 2025, with 2,330 people killed and 49,220 injured.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +38.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +38.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -62.5.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 20.00 + 24.50 + -12.50 + 6.00 = 38.00
Base: 38.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +38.0 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 38.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 1.59 points
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +10.0
What the evidence found
For Kazakhstan, official statistics report 1.943 billion passenger trips in 2025 and 88.9 billion passenger-km, both above 2024.
Bureau of National Statistics of KazakhstanFor Kazakhstan, the Ministry of Internal Affairs recorded 34,146 injury/death road crashes in 2025, with 2,330 people killed and 49,220 injured.
Ministry of Internal Affairs of KazakhstanFor Kazakhstan, official statistics report 1.943 billion passenger trips in 2025 and 88.9 billion passenger-km, both above 2024.
Bureau of National Statistics of KazakhstanPublished indicators
Bureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceMinistry of Internal Affairs of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceMinistry of Internal Affairs of Kazakhstan · 2025
Source
8% weight
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
What this category measures
Conditions that let people form stable families, raise children, multiply generations, share parental time and continue family life without punishing material barriers. New and re-reviewed profiles include total fertility as an explicit outcome signal.
TBFC targetPeople should be able to form, continue and multiply family life. Trott Bailey Family Civilization uses 5.0 children per woman as the fertility target; 2.1 is the replacement floor, not the aspiration, while housing, care, food and time should not be withheld behind financial thresholds. Access-gate research questionHow strongly do housing, childcare, health, food and work-income requirements delay or destabilize family formation and continuity, and is total fertility moving above replacement toward the 5.0-children-per-woman civilization target? Fertility methodNew and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Courtship, Marriage & Married Life
-61.7↓Money-gated · Evidence +40.8
Money-gated · Evidence +40.8
Score breakdown
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -52.4 × 25% = -13.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Kazakhstan recorded 115.9 thousand marriages and 335 thousand births in 2025, alongside positive natural population growth.
Kazakhstan recorded 115.9 thousand marriages and 335 thousand births in 2025, alongside positive natural population growth.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.8 × 35% = -18.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, uNICEF’s 2025 annual report says MICS 2024 found only 68.7% of children age 3–5 accessing preschool despite much higher official enrollment figures, with rural, low-income and disabled children least likely to access affordable quality preschool.
Exact point calculation
-40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.00 weighted points
Original evidence -40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -40.0; Money-gated reading -83.7 × 25% = -20.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, official 2025 data record 115.9 thousand marriages and 45.7 thousand divorces. These are period counts rather than a cohort divorce probability and are not treated as one.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points
Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.2 × 15% = -8.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Kazakhstan recorded 115.9 thousand marriages and 335 thousand births in 2025, alongside positive natural population growth.
For Kazakhstan, official 2025 data record 115.9 thousand marriages and 45.7 thousand divorces. These are period counts rather than a cohort divorce probability and are not treated as one.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +40.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +40.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -61.7.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 24.50 + -10.00 + 7.50 = 40.75
Base: 40.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +40.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 40.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 3.41 points
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion
First half — the established family and fertility assessment
The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.
Pre-policy score: +40.8
Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion
This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.
Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence
Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points
Final category calculation: +40.8 − 0 = +40.8 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)
Kazakhstan: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded in the cited legal-status review as of 2026-10-09. Article 2 of the Marriage and Family Code establishes the principle of a voluntary union of a man and a woman. This is a legal-classification reading only; it does not prove demographic causation.
Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2011-12-26 · Reviewed: 2026-10-09
Fertility and family policy: research and source notes
Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.
How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.
How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.
Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).
Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.
Abundance Gap: +5.0
What the evidence found
Kazakhstan recorded 115.9 thousand marriages and 335 thousand births in 2025, alongside positive natural population growth.
Bureau of National Statistics of KazakhstanFor Kazakhstan, official 2025 data record 115.9 thousand marriages and 45.7 thousand divorces. These are period counts rather than a cohort divorce probability and are not treated as one.
Bureau of National Statistics of KazakhstanFor Kazakhstan, uNICEF’s 2025 annual report says MICS 2024 found only 68.7% of children age 3–5 accessing preschool despite much higher official enrollment figures, with rural, low-income and disabled children least likely to access affordable quality preschool.
UNICEF KazakhstanKazakhstan recorded 115.9 thousand marriages and 335 thousand births in 2025, alongside positive natural population growth.
Bureau of National Statistics of KazakhstanPublished indicators
Bureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceUNICEF Kazakhstan · 2024
Source
5% weight
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
What this category measures
Whether land and settlement choice reach ordinary people rather than opportunity being functionally trapped inside expensive commercial centres.
TBFC targetSuitable productive land and settlement opportunity should not be functionally reserved for those able to outbid everyone else. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary families gain secure use of suitable productive ground without first accumulating enough money to purchase, finance or outbid others? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Compounds Are Civilization Circulation Systems
-64.1↓Money-gated · Evidence +32.0
Money-gated · Evidence +32.0
Score breakdown
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
Exact point calculation
90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points
Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -48.3 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Kazakhstan covers about 272.5 million hectares and agricultural land was reported at about 117.1 million hectares in 2024, creating substantial physical room for food, settlement and ecological systems.
Kazakhstan covers about 272.5 million hectares and agricultural land was reported at about 117.1 million hectares in 2024, creating substantial physical room for food, settlement and ecological systems.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -57.9 × 35% = -20.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, agricultural land area: 117.10 million hectares
For Kazakhstan, sown agricultural area: 23.60 million hectares
Exact point calculation
-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points
Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -89.1 × 25% = -22.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Kazakhstan recognizes private and state land rights, but current agricultural land access operates through regulated land-use rights and paid ownership/lease mechanisms rather than a universal free productive-ground entitlement.
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points
Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.3 × 15% = -9.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Kazakhstan covers about 272.5 million hectares and agricultural land was reported at about 117.1 million hectares in 2024, creating substantial physical room for food, settlement and ecological systems.
Kazakhstan recognizes private and state land rights, but current agricultural land access operates through regulated land-use rights and paid ownership/lease mechanisms rather than a universal free productive-ground entitlement.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +32.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +32.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.1.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 22.50 + 19.25 + -15.00 + 5.25 = 32.00
Base: 32.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +32.0 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 32.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 1.67 points
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +35.0
What the evidence found
Kazakhstan covers about 272.5 million hectares and agricultural land was reported at about 117.1 million hectares in 2024, creating substantial physical room for food, settlement and ecological systems.
Economic Research Institute / Ministry of Agriculture land balanceKazakhstan recognizes private and state land rights, but current agricultural land access operates through regulated land-use rights and paid ownership/lease mechanisms rather than a universal free productive-ground entitlement.
Government of Kazakhstan — Land CodeKazakhstan covers about 272.5 million hectares and agricultural land was reported at about 117.1 million hectares in 2024, creating substantial physical room for food, settlement and ecological systems.
Economic Research Institute / Ministry of Agriculture land balancePublished indicators
Economic Research Institute of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceKazakhstan Agriculture Finance / Ministry of Agriculture land balance · 2024
SourceMinistry of Agriculture of Kazakhstan · 2025
Source
6% weight
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
What this category measures
Peace of mind, social support, everyday safety, public beauty, recreation, nature, culture and delight reachable without constant payment.
TBFC targetBeauty, nature, recreation, rest and public delight should belong to ordinary life rather than appearing mainly after payment. Access-gate research questionHow much everyday rest, nature, recreation, culture and public beauty is freely reachable, rather than principally accessed through paid venues, travel or private property? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
-61.1↓Money-gated · Evidence +43.3
Money-gated · Evidence +43.3
Score breakdown
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
Exact point calculation
80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points
Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -51.1 × 25% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Kazakhstan reported 30.9 million hectares of specially protected natural areas at 1 January 2025, equal to 11.37% of national territory.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.8 × 35% = -18.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
World Happiness Report 2026 places Kazakhstan 33rd with a 2025 life evaluation of 6.633/10.
World Happiness Report 2026 places Kazakhstan 33rd with a 2025 life evaluation of 6.633/10.
Exact point calculation
-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points
Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -82.3 × 25% = -20.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, the national SDG report records a suicide mortality rate of 7.21 per 100,000 in 2024, with substantial sex and rural-urban differences.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points
Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.2 × 15% = -8.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
World Happiness Report 2026 places Kazakhstan 33rd with a 2025 life evaluation of 6.633/10.
For Kazakhstan, the national SDG report records a suicide mortality rate of 7.21 per 100,000 in 2024, with substantial sex and rural-urban differences.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +43.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +43.3. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -61.1.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 20.00 + 24.50 + -8.75 + 7.50 = 43.25
Base: 43.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +43.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 43.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 2.72 points
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +10.0
What the evidence found
World Happiness Report 2026 places Kazakhstan 33rd with a 2025 life evaluation of 6.633/10.
World Happiness ReportFor Kazakhstan, the national SDG report records a suicide mortality rate of 7.21 per 100,000 in 2024, with substantial sex and rural-urban differences.
Bureau of National Statistics of KazakhstanKazakhstan reported 30.9 million hectares of specially protected natural areas at 1 January 2025, equal to 11.37% of national territory.
Forestry and Wildlife Committee of KazakhstanWorld Happiness Report 2026 places Kazakhstan 33rd with a 2025 life evaluation of 6.633/10.
World Happiness ReportPublished indicators
World Happiness Report · 2025
SourceWorld Happiness Report · 2026
SourceForestry and Wildlife Committee of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2024
Source
6% weight
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
What this category measures
Whether soil, forests, wetlands, habitat, pollinators, species and water-holding landscapes are strengthening rather than being consumed.
TBFC targetRegenerating soil, water, habitat and food-bearing landscapes should be maintained as shared life-supporting capacity rather than only where a transaction makes them profitable. Access-gate research questionAre regenerative land, water and habitat functions maintained as life-supporting infrastructure even when no direct commercial return is available? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
-65.3↓Money-gated · Evidence +27.5
Money-gated · Evidence +27.5
Score breakdown
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -52.4 × 25% = -13.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, forest-covered land: 5.10 percent of national territory
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -57.9 × 35% = -20.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, forest resource area: 13.90 million hectares
Exact point calculation
-75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -18.75 weighted points
Original evidence -75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -75.0; Money-gated reading -93.2 × 25% = -23.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
UNDP reports approximately 75% of Kazakhstan’s agricultural soils affected by degradation and a 17% decline in potential soil fertility, citing the State Institute for Land Surveying.
UNDP reports approximately 75% of Kazakhstan’s agricultural soils affected by degradation and a 17% decline in potential soil fertility, citing the State Institute for Land Surveying.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -57.9 × 15% = -8.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Protected areas cover 11.37% of territory; forest resource area reached 13.9 million hectares at end-2024 and was 10.1% above 2014. Kazakhstan has also committed to restoring more than four million hectares of degraded land.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +27.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +27.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -65.3.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 19.25 + -18.75 + 8.25 = 27.50
Base: 27.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 27.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 1.73 points
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
UNDP reports approximately 75% of Kazakhstan’s agricultural soils affected by degradation and a 17% decline in potential soil fertility, citing the State Institute for Land Surveying.
UNDP KazakhstanProtected areas cover 11.37% of territory; forest resource area reached 13.9 million hectares at end-2024 and was 10.1% above 2014. Kazakhstan has also committed to restoring more than four million hectares of degraded land.
Bureau of National Statistics / UNDP KazakhstanUNDP reports approximately 75% of Kazakhstan’s agricultural soils affected by degradation and a 17% decline in potential soil fertility, citing the State Institute for Land Surveying.
UNDP KazakhstanPublished indicators
Government of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2024
SourceUNDP Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceUNDP Kazakhstan / State Institute for Land Surveying · 2025
SourceForestry and Wildlife Committee of Kazakhstan · 2025
Source
5% weight
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
What this category measures
Physical safety, usable justice, legal identity, reliable public administration and low needless institutional burden.
TBFC targetUsable justice, legal identity, safety and ordinary administration should remain accessible regardless of wealth. Access-gate research questionDo fees, legal costs, bail, fines, documentation costs or ability to hire expertise materially change access to justice, safety or public administration? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Pacorips Constitutional Foundations
-63.9↓Money-gated · Evidence +32.8
Money-gated · Evidence +32.8
Score breakdown
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points
Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.1 × 25% = -13.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
The 2025 World Justice Project score for Kazakhstan was 0.54, ranking 66th of 143 countries and 5th of 15 in Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
For Kazakhstan, a WJP score of 0.54 and rank 66/143 indicate meaningful rule-of-law gaps, while 132,778 criminal offenses were registered in 2024. The score uses these concrete measures without turning contested political labels into a penalty.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points
Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -56.5 × 35% = -19.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
The 2025 World Justice Project score for Kazakhstan was 0.54, ranking 66th of 143 countries and 5th of 15 in Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
The 2025 World Justice Project score for Kazakhstan was 0.54, ranking 66th of 143 countries and 5th of 15 in Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
Exact point calculation
-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points
Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -85.0 × 25% = -21.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, a WJP score of 0.54 and rank 66/143 indicate meaningful rule-of-law gaps, while 132,778 criminal offenses were registered in 2024. The score uses these concrete measures without turning contested political labels into a penalty.
For Kazakhstan, the Prosecutor General reported registered criminal offenses down 5% in 2024, homicides down 4% to 566, robberies down 24% and theft down 28%, while fraud and internet fraud increased.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points
Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -60.6 × 15% = -9.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
The 2025 World Justice Project score for Kazakhstan was 0.54, ranking 66th of 143 countries and 5th of 15 in Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
For Kazakhstan, a WJP score of 0.54 and rank 66/143 indicate meaningful rule-of-law gaps, while 132,778 criminal offenses were registered in 2024. The score uses these concrete measures without turning contested political labels into a penalty.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +32.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +32.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.9.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 16.25 + 21.00 + -11.25 + 6.75 = 32.75
Base: 32.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +32.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 32.75 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 1.71 points
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +5.0
What the evidence found
The 2025 World Justice Project score for Kazakhstan was 0.54, ranking 66th of 143 countries and 5th of 15 in Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
World Justice ProjectFor Kazakhstan, a WJP score of 0.54 and rank 66/143 indicate meaningful rule-of-law gaps, while 132,778 criminal offenses were registered in 2024. The score uses these concrete measures without turning contested political labels into a penalty.
World Justice Project / Prosecutor GeneralFor Kazakhstan, the Prosecutor General reported registered criminal offenses down 5% in 2024, homicides down 4% to 566, robberies down 24% and theft down 28%, while fraud and internet fraud increased.
Prosecutor General / Government of KazakhstanThe 2025 World Justice Project score for Kazakhstan was 0.54, ranking 66th of 143 countries and 5th of 15 in Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
World Justice ProjectPublished indicators
World Justice Project · 2025
SourceWorld Justice Project · 2025
SourceProsecutor General / Government of Kazakhstan · 2024
SourceProsecutor General / Government of Kazakhstan · 2024
Source
4% weight
Durability, Repair & Material Return
What this category measures
Whether useful materials, infrastructure and goods are maintained, repaired, recovered and cycled instead of becoming waste; documented harmful acceptance of imported garbage or disguised low-utility dumping is deducted.
TBFC targetRepair, maintenance and useful material circulation should protect capability instead of forcing repeated repurchase as the default route to continued use. Access-gate research questionDo repair and maintenance remain practically accessible, or do pricing, proprietary restrictions and replacement incentives turn continued use into repeated purchasing? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Repair Is Sovereignty
-64.0↓Money-gated · Evidence +32.5
Money-gated · Evidence +32.5
Score breakdown
Durability, Repair & Material Return
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.8 × 25% = -13.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, municipal waste collected: 4.10 million tonnes
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -57.9 × 35% = -20.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Kazakhstan collected 4.1 million tonnes of municipal waste in 2025, sorted 1.5 million tonnes, and the Ecology Ministry reports recycling rising from 25.8% in 2024 to 28.6% in 2025.
Kazakhstan collected 4.1 million tonnes of municipal waste in 2025, sorted 1.5 million tonnes, and the Ecology Ministry reports recycling rising from 25.8% in 2024 to 28.6% in 2025.
Exact point calculation
-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points
Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.0; Money-gated reading -86.4 × 25% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, a 28.6% municipal recycling rate means the majority of the municipal waste stream still exits the recycling loop; the ministry’s 2030 target is 40%, showing the system is still in expansion rather than closed-loop maturity.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -57.9 × 15% = -8.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, organizations sorting, utilizing or disposing municipal waste: 278.00 organizations
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +32.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +32.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.0.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 19.25 + -12.50 + 8.25 = 32.50
Base: 32.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +32.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 32.50 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 1.36 points
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +15.0
What the evidence found
Kazakhstan collected 4.1 million tonnes of municipal waste in 2025, sorted 1.5 million tonnes, and the Ecology Ministry reports recycling rising from 25.8% in 2024 to 28.6% in 2025.
Bureau of National Statistics / Ministry of EcologyFor Kazakhstan, a 28.6% municipal recycling rate means the majority of the municipal waste stream still exits the recycling loop; the ministry’s 2030 target is 40%, showing the system is still in expansion rather than closed-loop maturity.
Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of KazakhstanKazakhstan collected 4.1 million tonnes of municipal waste in 2025, sorted 1.5 million tonnes, and the Ecology Ministry reports recycling rising from 25.8% in 2024 to 28.6% in 2025.
Bureau of National Statistics / Ministry of EcologyPublished indicators
Bureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceMinistry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Kazakhstan · 2025
SourceBureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan · 2025
Source
6% weight
International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
What this category measures
How easily visitors, migrants, refugees and neighbouring families can enter, remain, regularize status, prevent statelessness, build family continuity and participate in ordinary civic and economic life.
TBFC targetA country should have a humane vision for visitors, migrants, refugees and neighbouring families: practical entry, legal identity, family continuity, protection from statelessness, a route into ordinary life and a real place to contribute and grow with the society. Access-gate research questionWho can enter and stay, how wide is visa-free/eVisa/eTA reach, can newcomers regularize status and work, are refugees and children protected from statelessness, can families remain together, and does the country have a practical long-term vision for newcomers to join ordinary life and contribute? International scoring method
Welcome research checks practical entry breadth, visa-free/eVisa/eTA reach, lawful passport or citizenship pathways available to foreigners, birthright citizenship and statelessness prevention, parent/child family-status continuity, refugee recognition, migrant regularization, work/school/health access, family reunion and a credible national vision for newcomers to settle, contribute and grow with society.
A verified eVisa program open to more than 100 nationalities is recorded as a positive factual Welcome finding (the historical +5 scoring rule is retired). Researchers must verify the eligible-nationality breadth, not merely the existence of an online visa form. A lawful international citizenship/passport route available to qualifying foreigners is recorded as a Welcome access finding. The score must distinguish a usable transparent route from an expensive, narrow or highly discretionary program. Broad birthright citizenship, conditional territorial citizenship and statelessness safeguards are recorded with their precise legal eligibility and practical results. A system that leaves children without effective nationality, identity or durable status is a serious negative. A practical route that lets parents secure residence or citizenship through a child born in the country is documented for family-continuity review; long limbo, family separation or rules that strand the child between statuses reduce the score.
Refugee and migrant welcome is judged by lived access as well as admission: recognition, non-refoulement, legal documents, work, education, health care, family continuity, regularization, permanence and citizenship pathways all matter. Forced removal, refoulement, arbitrary detention, family separation and especially deporting or transferring people to unrelated third countries without a genuine durable-protection connection are negative Welcome evidence. Welcome is stronger when the country has a coherent plan for land, housing, work, contribution, family life and civic integration so newcomers are absorbed as people who can help the country grow, rather than warehoused indefinitely in camps or temporary limbo.
Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Refugee Living Should Be Glamorous, Purposeful and Liberating
-64.0↓Money-gated · Evidence +32.5
Money-gated · Evidence +32.5
International score breakdown
International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.8 × 25% = -13.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Kazakhstan's Foreign Ministry lists visa-free stays for many ordinary-passport nationalities, with length depending on country and other visitors requiring visas.
For Kazakhstan, the Foreign Ministry’s current visa table shows many ordinary-passport holders can enter visa-free for 14, 30, 60 or 90 days, while many other nationalities still require visas. Short-stay access is not treated as settlement or belonging.
Exact point calculation
30.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points
Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -64.7 × 30% = -19.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, uNHCR reports recognized refugees, asylum seekers and refugee-like groups, whose secure legal status differs by category.
UNHCR reports 278 refugees and 206 asylum-seekers in Kazakhstan at 30 June 2026, along with larger refugee-like and other international-protection populations. Kazakhstan has national asylum procedures under its refugee law.
Exact point calculation
20.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 5.00 weighted points
Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -67.4 × 25% = -16.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, uNHCR reported 278 recognized refugees and 206 asylum seekers as at 30 June 2026, and records protection-registration challenges for some long-resident people.
For Kazakhstan, uNHCR’s 2025 results report notes limited progress on legal status for some long-resident mandate refugees and says migration-control measures affected people awaiting registration, including forced returns.
Exact point calculation
5.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 1.00 weighted points
Original evidence +5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +5.0; Money-gated reading -71.5 × 20% = -14.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, uNHCR's 2025 results report describes some forced returns and registration barriers; visitor convenience alone cannot guarantee asylum or family security.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +32.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +32.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.0.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 9.00 + 5.00 + 1.00 = 32.50
Base: 32.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +32.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 32.50 × (6.00 × 76.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 1.55 points
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 76% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.56%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
What the evidence found
For Kazakhstan, uNHCR's 2025 results report describes some forced returns and registration barriers; visitor convenience alone cannot guarantee asylum or family security.
2026-10-11 UNHCR Kazakhstan 2025 annual resultsFor Kazakhstan, uNHCR reported 278 recognized refugees and 206 asylum seekers as at 30 June 2026, and records protection-registration challenges for some long-resident people.
2026-10-11 UNHCR Kazakhstan protection data 2026For Kazakhstan, uNHCR reports recognized refugees, asylum seekers and refugee-like groups, whose secure legal status differs by category.
2026-10-11 UNHCR Central Asia data dashboardKazakhstan's Foreign Ministry lists visa-free stays for many ordinary-passport nationalities, with length depending on country and other visitors requiring visas.
2026-10-11 Kazakhstan Ministry of Foreign Affairs visa informationFor Kazakhstan, uNHCR’s 2025 results report notes limited progress on legal status for some long-resident mandate refugees and says migration-control measures affected people awaiting registration, including forced returns.
UNHCRUNHCR reports 278 refugees and 206 asylum-seekers in Kazakhstan at 30 June 2026, along with larger refugee-like and other international-protection populations. Kazakhstan has national asylum procedures under its refugee law.
UNHCRFor Kazakhstan, the Foreign Ministry’s current visa table shows many ordinary-passport holders can enter visa-free for 14, 30, 60 or 90 days, while many other nationalities still require visas. Short-stay access is not treated as settlement or belonging.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of KazakhstanPublished indicators
6% weight
External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
What this category measures
Documented effects of a country beyond its borders: beneficial contribution, mutuality, external harm, extraction, repair, and verified deductions for exported garbage, waste or disguised low-utility dumping.
TBFC targetA civilization should increase useful local capability beyond its borders through medicine, training, disaster help, technical cooperation, peace-building and other mutually useful contribution, while avoiding extraction, exported harm and displacement. Access-gate research questionDo the country’s actions abroad increase health, skill, safety, resilience and locally retained capability, or do they export extraction, coercion, environmental harm, displacement, debt or other burdens? International scoring method
Legacy method: External Footprint documents independently verified beneficial action beyond the border, including medical missions, public-health help, scholarships, training, technical cooperation, disaster relief, humanitarian logistics, peacekeeping and other programs that leave useful capability with the receiving society. It also documents extractive conduct, exported environmental or human harm, coercive external security practices, abusive displacement outsourcing and whether documented harm is repaired, with a separately scored 6% category once four evidence-backed rails have been reviewed. Verified waste exports and disguised low-utility dumping are penalized through the transboundary harm ledger, as are irresponsible import acceptance practices through Domestic Durability & Material Return.
International contribution is investigated relative to capacity and quality, not raw size alone; documented outward activity is distinguished from independent benefit and local mutuality.
Dumping and harmful material transfers
Waste or disguised low-utility exports reduce External Footprint. Real reuse must be distinguished from disguised disposal. The sender retains responsibility for harms shifted abroad. Method v3: harmful imported garbage and low-utility dumping belong in External Footprint, where inbound transfer responsibility is 15% of the category. Historical method v2 import deductions remain archived under Domestic Durability until that country receives a sourced v3 score. Do not double-count.
Read the Trott Bailey Family work: When Another Nation Cleans Up Your Garbage
-67.0↓Money-gated · Evidence +21.6
Money-gated · Evidence +21.6
International score breakdown
External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
Exact point calculation
68.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.00 weighted points
Original evidence +68.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +72.7; Money-gated reading -53.1 × 25% = -13.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, kazAID reports providing over USD 34 million in humanitarian aid and USD 183 million in development funding across more than 40 countries over five years.
For Kazakhstan, kazAID reports providing over USD 34 million in humanitarian aid and USD 183 million in development funding across more than 40 countries over five years.
Exact point calculation
53.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.25 weighted points
Original evidence +53.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +57.7; Money-gated reading -57.1 × 25% = -14.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kazakhstan, kazAID supports digitalisation, education and health in Central Asia and Afghanistan, though published aggregate spending is not recipient-level household evidence.
For Kazakhstan, kazAID supports digitalisation, education and health in Central Asia and Afghanistan, though published aggregate spending is not recipient-level household evidence.
Kazatomprom reports that uranium production from operations located in Kazakhstan and consolidated within the group represented approximately 39% of global uranium production in 2025. This demonstrates substantial cross-border resource contribution and dependency, while questions of mutuality, downstream benefit, environmental burden and repair require a wider ledger than the current pack supports.
Exact point calculation
-36.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -12.60 weighted points
Original evidence -36.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -31.4; Money-gated reading -81.3 × 35% = -28.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Kazakhstan's fossil-energy extraction and high per-person territorial CO2 are material overseas footprint concerns; cross-border harm attributable to each export remains unmeasured.
Kazakhstan's fossil-energy extraction and high per-person territorial CO2 are material overseas footprint concerns; cross-border harm attributable to each export remains unmeasured.
For Kazakhstan, the current public datasets give 213 million tonnes of consumption-based CO2 in 2023 and about 287 million tonnes of territorial CO2 in 2024. Because the accounting years differ, the pack does not subtract them or claim a precise net-exported carbon amount.
For Kazakhstan, global Carbon Budget data processed by Our World in Data record about 287 million tonnes of territorial fossil-fuel and industry CO2 in 2024, equal to 13.94 tonnes per person and about 0.74% of global annual CO2. These are material external-footprint signals, but they are retained as factual measurements rather than converted into a policy score.
Exact point calculation
-5.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -0.75 weighted points
Original evidence -5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -0.3; Money-gated reading -72.9 × 15% = -10.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Kazakhstan's 2014 official aid law requires respect for partner priorities and accountability; implementing audits and individual damage repair need independent confirmation.
Kazakhstan's 2014 official aid law requires respect for partner priorities and accountability; implementing audits and individual damage repair need independent confirmation.
For Kazakhstan, 2024 plastic scrap imports were 264,163 kg, mainly from Russia.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +16.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): +4.7. Effective evidence: +21.6. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -67.0.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.00 + 13.25 + -12.60 + -0.75 = 16.90
Base: 21.55 · reviewed adjustment: 4.65 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +21.6 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 21.55 × (6.00 × 80.00%) ÷ 95.56 = 1.08 points
Material transfers: scored in International Footprint
Exporter responsibility: -25.00/100 (15% of footprint); importer responsibility: 15.00/100 (15% of footprint). Material movement is a real workload; these are TBF authored judgments, not certified illegal dumping estimates. Each role is included ONCE in the Footprint 3.1 published score.
The material-transfer burden already affects the published score. Facility-specific downstream harm remains a separate research claim. No second penalty is added for the same trade.
Method 3.1.4 Footprint 25% useful help, 25% mutual benefit, 20% other harm/repair, 30% waste transfer (export 15%, import 15%). Retained historic rails 1–3. 2024 HS3915 export: 2024 plastic scrap exports were 20.638m kg, mainly to Russia and Uzbekistan. Import: 2024 plastic scrap imports were 264,163 kg, mainly from Russia.. Score +21.55. TBF normative judgment, not verified dumping. Importer and exporter are each separately weighted; do not deduct waste twice.
For Kazakhstan, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 80% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.80%. After normalization across Kazakhstan’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
What the evidence found
Kazakhstan's 2014 official aid law requires respect for partner priorities and accountability; implementing audits and individual damage repair need independent confirmation.
2026-10-11 Kazakhstan official development assistance lawKazakhstan's fossil-energy extraction and high per-person territorial CO2 are material overseas footprint concerns; cross-border harm attributable to each export remains unmeasured.
2026-10-11 Our World in Data Kazakhstan CO2 profileFor Kazakhstan, kazAID supports digitalisation, education and health in Central Asia and Afghanistan, though published aggregate spending is not recipient-level household evidence.
2026-10-11 Kazakhstan MFA KazAID fifth-anniversaryFor Kazakhstan, kazAID reports providing over USD 34 million in humanitarian aid and USD 183 million in development funding across more than 40 countries over five years.
2026-10-11 Kazakhstan MFA KazAID fifth-anniversary 2025Kazakhstan's 2014 official aid law requires respect for partner priorities and accountability; implementing audits and individual damage repair need independent confirmation.
2026-10-11 Kazakhstan official development assistance lawKazakhstan's fossil-energy extraction and high per-person territorial CO2 are material overseas footprint concerns; cross-border harm attributable to each export remains unmeasured.
2026-10-11 Our World in Data Kazakhstan CO2 profileFor Kazakhstan, kazAID supports digitalisation, education and health in Central Asia and Afghanistan, though published aggregate spending is not recipient-level household evidence.
2026-10-11 Kazakhstan MFA KazAID fifth-anniversaryFor Kazakhstan, kazAID reports providing over USD 34 million in humanitarian aid and USD 183 million in development funding across more than 40 countries over five years.
2026-10-11 Kazakhstan MFA KazAID fifth-anniversary 2025For Kazakhstan, 2024 plastic scrap imports were 264,163 kg, mainly from Russia.
2024-12-31 WITS/UN Comtrade HS3915 2024Kazatomprom reports that uranium production from operations located in Kazakhstan and consolidated within the group represented approximately 39% of global uranium production in 2025. This demonstrates substantial cross-border resource contribution and dependency, while questions of mutuality, downstream benefit, environmental burden and repair require a wider ledger than the current pack supports.
NAC Kazatomprom JSCFor Kazakhstan, the current public datasets give 213 million tonnes of consumption-based CO2 in 2023 and about 287 million tonnes of territorial CO2 in 2024. Because the accounting years differ, the pack does not subtract them or claim a precise net-exported carbon amount.
Our World in Data / Global Carbon Budget · Our World in Data / Global Carbon BudgetFor Kazakhstan, global Carbon Budget data processed by Our World in Data record about 287 million tonnes of territorial fossil-fuel and industry CO2 in 2024, equal to 13.94 tonnes per person and about 0.74% of global annual CO2. These are material external-footprint signals, but they are retained as factual measurements rather than converted into a policy score.
Our World in Data / Global Carbon BudgetPublished indicators
Our World in Data / Global Carbon Budget · 2024
SourceOur World in Data / Global Carbon Budget · 2024
SourceOur World in Data / Global Carbon Budget · 2024
SourceOur World in Data / Global Carbon Budget · 2023
SourceOur World in Data / Global Carbon Budget · 2023
SourceNAC Kazatomprom JSC · 2025
SourceTrott Bailey Family Civilization Target
The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping
Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.
This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.
and then 
