Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

India 🇮🇳

India currently ranks #88 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -59.94. This country is money-gated (4.25/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Energy and weakest in External Footprint across 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Tracking baselineEvidence through 9 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-59.9
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: +32.2 · Money Gate: 4.25/20 · Headline: -59.9.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#88of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

IndiaLast recorded move: down from #87 to #88.Recent recorded movements
  1. #87 → #8823 Oct 2026 · 19:04 GMT-0500
  2. #77 → #8720 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  3. #77 → #8020 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #70 → #7720 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 44: rank 119. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 44: rank 121. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 44: rank 122. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 44: rank 122. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 44: rank 123. 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500 – 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 44: rank 122. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 44: rank 104. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 44: rank 103. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 44: rank 102. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 44: rank 101. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 44: rank 100. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 44: rank 90. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 44: rank 89. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 44: rank 88. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 44: rank 89. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 44: rank 90. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 44: rank 89. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 44: rank 90. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 44: rank 89. 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 44: rank 88. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 44: rank 87. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 44: rank 86. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 44: rank 85. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 44: rank 84. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 44: rank 83. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 44: rank 82. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 44: rank 81. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 44: rank 80. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 44: rank 79. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 44: rank 78. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 44: rank 77. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 44: rank 76. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 44: rank 75. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 44: rank 74. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 44: rank 73. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 44: rank 72. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 44: rank 71. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 44: rank 70. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 44: rank 69. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 44: rank 68. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 44: rank 70. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 44: rank 77. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 44: rank 80. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 44: rank 88. 23 Oct 2026 · 19:04 GMT-0500NOW #88Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

97%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 80.0% + 6.0 × 78.0% = 97.48% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#6

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

0.5 / 4

Food

Why 0.5 / 4?

PM POSHAN funds a daily cooked meal for eligible children in government and aided schools, not general household free meals.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-10
1.0 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 1.0 / 4?

PMAY-U 2.0 gives subsidies and may give some landless families state-issued land rights, but most homes are constructed or purchased with additional resources.

Point calculation

1.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 25.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-10
2.0 / 4

Healthcare

Why 2.0 / 4?

Public Ayushman Arogya Mandir primary care is free to users and PM-JAY cashless hospitalization covers eligible households; coverage and eligibility limit universal access.

Point calculation

2.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 50.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-10
0.3 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.3 / 4?

Some states provide fare-free public buses to specific groups; most ordinary travel still involves payment and there is no all-India unconditional free route.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-10
0.5 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 0.5 / 4?

Rooftop-solar subsidies can produce up to 300 monthly units without a net energy charge for enrolled households; installation/eligibility and billed grid use constrain reach.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-10
Money Gate score
  • Food0.5 / 4
  • Housing / Land1.0 / 4
  • Healthcare2.0 / 4
  • Transportation0.3 / 4
  • Water / Energy0.5 / 4
  • Money still needed15.8 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 4.3 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 0.50 + Housing / Land 1.00 + Healthcare 2.00 + Transportation 0.25 + Water / Energy 0.50 = 4.25 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
78.0 / 100
Why 78.0 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -56.08) ÷ 2 = 78.04 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-39.4
Why -39.4?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 4.25 = -39.4

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-63.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +20.0

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-63.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-50.0× 25%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -50.0 × 25% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

All-India, rural+urban, person total, current weekly status. This is paid/economic activity and does not include unpaid domestic and care work.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-56.1× 35%= -19.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -56.1 × 35% = -19.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

All-India, rural+urban, person total, current weekly status. This is paid/economic activity and does not include unpaid domestic and care work.

India National Statistics Office conducted its 2024 Time Use Survey across January–December 2024, measuring paid work, unpaid domestic work and care. Results were published in March 2025, allowing paid and unpaid family workloads to be assessed separately.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-87.9× 25%= -22.0 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -87.9 × 25% = -22.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

India National Statistics Office conducted its 2024 Time Use Survey across January–December 2024, measuring paid work, unpaid domestic work and care. Results were published in March 2025, allowing paid and unpaid family workloads to be assessed separately.

India 2024 national time-use survey found women aged 15–59 who performed unpaid domestic work averaged 305 minutes per day versus 86 minutes for men. Male paid-activity participants averaged 421 minutes and female participants 305.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-63.6× 15%= -9.5 points
Exact point calculation

20.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.00 weighted points

Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -63.6 × 15% = -9.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

All-India, rural+urban, person total, current weekly status. This is paid/economic activity and does not include unpaid domestic and care work.

India National Statistics Office conducted its 2024 Time Use Survey across January–December 2024, measuring paid work, unpaid domestic work and care. Results were published in March 2025, allowing paid and unpaid family workloads to be assessed separately.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.50 + -19.62 + -21.97 + -9.54 = -63.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +20.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +20.0. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+20.0 Original evidence category score+20.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 16.25 + 15.75 + -15.00 + 3.00 = 20.00

Base: 20.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +20.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 20.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.85 points

For India, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — human-time-burden domestic evidence retained

All-India, rural+urban, person total, current weekly status. This is paid/economic activity and does not include unpaid domestic and care work.

2026-10-10 Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation
2026-10-21 independent source check — IND — household time and care

India National Statistics Office conducted its 2024 Time Use Survey across January–December 2024, measuring paid work, unpaid domestic work and care. Results were published in March 2025, allowing paid and unpaid family workloads to be assessed separately.

2025-03-28 India National Statistics Office / PIB
2026 reset audit — India — family time across work and home

India 2024 national time-use survey found women aged 15–59 who performed unpaid domestic work averaged 305 minutes per day versus 86 minutes for men. Male paid-activity participants averaged 421 minutes and female participants 305.

2024-12-31 India National Statistics Office

Published indicators

Average hours actually worked per week — all workers41.70 hours/week

Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation · 2024

Source
Average hours actually worked per week — regular wage/salaried workers48.20 hours/week

Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation · 2024

Source
Female participants: unpaid domestic services for household members289.00 minutes/day

Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation · 2024

Source
Male participants: unpaid domestic services for household members88.00 minutes/day

Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation · 2024

Source
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-61.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence +28.8

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-61.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-45.4× 25%= -11.4 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -45.4 × 25% = -11.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Dashboard showed 100.26 lakh completed houses. This measures programme delivery capacity, not the total adequacy of India’s housing stock.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-56.1× 35%= -19.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 1.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -56.1 × 35% = -19.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Dashboard showed 100.26 lakh completed houses. This measures programme delivery capacity, not the total adequacy of India’s housing stock.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-86.4× 25%= -21.6 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -86.4 × 25% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, nHB 50-city housing price index annual change: 5.00 percent

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-56.1× 15%= -8.4 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -56.1 × 15% = -8.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Dashboard showed 100.26 lakh completed houses. This measures programme delivery capacity, not the total adequacy of India’s housing stock.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.36 + -19.62 + -21.59 + -8.41 = -61.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +28.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +28.8. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -61.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+28.8 Original evidence category score+28.8 Contribution to national evidence score+2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 15.75 + -13.75 + 6.75 = 28.75

Base: 28.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +28.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 28.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.36 points

For India, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +35.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — housing-shelter-reach domestic evidence retained

Dashboard showed 100.26 lakh completed houses. This measures programme delivery capacity, not the total adequacy of India’s housing stock.

2026-10-10 Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs

Published indicators

PMAY-Urban houses completed10,026,000.00 houses

Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs · 2026

Source
PMAY-Urban houses sanctioned12,493,000.00 houses

Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs · 2026

Source
NHB 50-city housing price index annual change5.00 percent

National Housing Bank · 2025

Source
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-56.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +43.3

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-56.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-42.4× 25%= -10.6 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -42.4 × 25% = -10.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For India, about 80.67 crore persons were covered under NFSA at the time of the report. Coverage eligibility is not the same as nutritional adequacy.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-47.0× 35%= -16.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -47.0 × 35% = -16.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For India, people covered under National Food Security Act: 806,700,000.00 people

For India, free foodgrain entitlement for Priority Households: 5.00 kg/person/month

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-86.4× 25%= -21.6 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -86.4 × 25% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, stunting among measured Anganwadi-enrolled children under five: 33.00 percent

For India, underweight among measured Anganwadi-enrolled children under five: 14.00 percent

For India, wasting among measured Anganwadi-enrolled children under five: 5.00 percent

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-53.0× 15%= -8.0 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -53.0 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For India, about 80.67 crore persons were covered under NFSA at the time of the report. Coverage eligibility is not the same as nutritional adequacy.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.60 + -16.44 + -21.59 + -7.95 = -56.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +43.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +43.3. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -56.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+43.3 Original evidence category score+43.3 Contribution to national evidence score+4.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 26.25 + -13.75 + 8.25 = 43.25

Base: 43.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +43.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 43.25 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 3.99 points

For India, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — food-nourishment-free-food domestic evidence retained

For India, about 80.67 crore persons were covered under NFSA at the time of the report. Coverage eligibility is not the same as nutritional adequacy.

2026-10-10 Department of Food and Public Distribution

Published indicators

People covered under National Food Security Act806,700,000.00 people

Department of Food and Public Distribution · 2025

Source
Free foodgrain entitlement for Priority Households5.00 kg/person/month

Department of Food and Public Distribution · 2026

Source
Stunting among measured Anganwadi-enrolled children under five33.00 percent

Ministry of Women and Child Development / Press Information Bureau · 2025

Source
Underweight among measured Anganwadi-enrolled children under five14.00 percent

Ministry of Women and Child Development / Press Information Bureau · 2025

Source
Wasting among measured Anganwadi-enrolled children under five5.00 percent

Ministry of Women and Child Development / Press Information Bureau · 2025

Source
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-56.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence +45.3

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-56.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-43.9× 25%= -11.0 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -43.9 × 25% = -11.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Reported by States/UTs under Jal Jeevan Mission: 15.89 crore of 19.36 crore rural households. This is rural household connection coverage, not an all-India urban+rural safely-managed-water measure.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-47.0× 35%= -16.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -47.0 × 35% = -16.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For India, rural households reported with tap water supply: 82.09 percent

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.3× 25%= -20.8 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.3 × 25% = -20.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, household tap connections meeting combined functionality test: 76.00 percent

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-51.5× 15%= -7.7 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -51.5 × 15% = -7.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, villages attaining ODF Plus status: 96.00 percent

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.98 + -16.44 + -20.83 + -7.72 = -56.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +45.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +45.3. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -56.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+45.3 Original evidence category score+45.3 Contribution to national evidence score+2.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 26.25 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 45.25

Base: 45.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +45.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 45.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.79 points

For India, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — water-sanitation domestic evidence retained

Reported by States/UTs under Jal Jeevan Mission: 15.89 crore of 19.36 crore rural households. This is rural household connection coverage, not an all-India urban+rural safely-managed-water measure.

2026-10-10 Ministry of Jal Shakti / Press Information Bureau

Published indicators

Rural households reported with tap water supply82.09 percent

Ministry of Jal Shakti / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
Household tap connections meeting combined functionality test76.00 percent

Ministry of Jal Shakti / Press Information Bureau · 2024

Source
Villages attaining ODF Plus status96.00 percent

Government of India / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
Individual household toilets constructed under SBM-Grameen121,900,000.00 toilets

Government of India / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-53.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +54.5

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-53.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-42.4× 25%= -10.6 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -42.4 × 25% = -10.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For India, world Development Indicators estimate. Near-universal connection does not itself measure reliability, affordability, voltage quality or hours of service.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-43.9× 35%= -15.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

85.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 29.75 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -43.9 × 35% = -15.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For India, access to electricity: 99.90 percent

For India, free LPG connections provided under PMUY: 105,700,000.00 connections

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-78.8× 25%= -19.7 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.0; Money-gated reading -78.8 × 25% = -19.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, national energy shortage: 0.00 percent

For India, average annual LPG refills among PMUY beneficiaries: 4.71 refills/year

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-50.0× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -50.0 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, non-fossil share of installed electricity capacity: 54.40 percent

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.60 + -15.37 + -19.70 + -7.50 = -53.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +54.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +54.5. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -53.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+54.5 Original evidence category score+54.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 29.75 + -7.50 + 9.75 = 54.50

Base: 54.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +54.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 54.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.80 points

For India, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +5.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — energy-household-capability domestic evidence retained

For India, world Development Indicators estimate. Near-universal connection does not itself measure reliability, affordability, voltage quality or hours of service.

2026-10-10 World Bank

Published indicators

Access to electricity99.90 percent

World Bank · 2024

Source
National energy shortage0.00 percent

Ministry of Power / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
Non-fossil share of installed electricity capacity54.40 percent

Ministry of New and Renewable Energy / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
Free LPG connections provided under PMUY105,700,000.00 connections

Government of India / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
Average annual LPG refills among PMUY beneficiaries4.71 refills/year

Government of India / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-58.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +36.0

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-58.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-45.4× 25%= -11.4 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -45.4 × 25% = -11.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For India, world Development Indicators most recent value. This is an outcome measure, not a direct measure of service availability.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-50.0× 35%= -17.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 2.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -50.0 × 35% = -17.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For India, cashless hospital admissions authorized under AB-PMJAY: 126,900,000.00 admissions

For India, ayushman cards issued: 455,000,000.00 cards

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-87.9× 25%= -22.0 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -87.9 × 25% = -22.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, out-of-pocket expenditure as share of total health expenditure: 43.40 percent

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-53.0× 15%= -8.0 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -53.0 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, life expectancy at birth: 72.00 years

For India, maternal mortality ratio: 88.00 deaths/100000 live births

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.36 + -17.50 + -21.97 + -7.95 = -58.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +36.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +36.0. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+36.0 Original evidence category score+36.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 22.75 + -15.00 + 8.25 = 36.00

Base: 36.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +36.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 36.00 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.59 points

For India, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — health-care-reach domestic evidence retained

For India, world Development Indicators most recent value. This is an outcome measure, not a direct measure of service availability.

2026-10-10 World Bank

Published indicators

Life expectancy at birth72.00 years

World Bank · 2024

Source
Maternal mortality ratio88.00 deaths/100000 live births

Registrar General of India / Ministry of Health and Family Welfare · 2023

Source
Cashless hospital admissions authorized under AB-PMJAY126,900,000.00 admissions

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
Ayushman cards issued455,000,000.00 cards

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
Out-of-pocket expenditure as share of total health expenditure43.40 percent

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare / Press Information Bureau · 2023

Source
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-57.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +41.5

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-57.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-42.4× 25%= -10.6 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -42.4 × 25% = -10.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For India, uDISE+ collected individual student-wise data from recognized schools and reported 24.69 crore students. This is enrolment/reach, not evidence that all enrolled students are learning at grade level.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-48.5× 35%= -17.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -48.5 × 35% = -17.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For India, literacy rate, population age 7 years and above: 80.90 percent

For India, gross enrolment ratio — secondary stage: 68.50 percent

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-86.4× 25%= -21.6 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -86.4 × 25% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, annual dropout rate — secondary level: 11.50 percent

For India, pARAKH national average — Grade 6 mathematics: 46.00 percent correct

For India, pARAKH national average — Grade 9 mathematics: 37.00 percent correct

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-53.0× 15%= -8.0 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -53.0 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, pARAKH national average — Grade 3 language: 64.00 percent correct

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.60 + -16.97 + -21.59 + -7.95 = -57.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +41.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +41.5. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -57.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.5 Original evidence category score+41.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 24.50 + -13.75 + 8.25 = 41.50

Base: 41.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.55 points

For India, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — education-human-capability domestic evidence retained

For India, uDISE+ collected individual student-wise data from recognized schools and reported 24.69 crore students. This is enrolment/reach, not evidence that all enrolled students are learning at grade level.

2026-10-10 Ministry of Education

Published indicators

Students reported in recognized schools246,900,000.00 students

Ministry of Education · 2025

Source
Literacy rate, population age 7 years and above80.90 percent

Ministry of Education citing PLFS 2023-24 · 2024

Source
Gross enrolment ratio — secondary stage68.50 percent

Department of School Education & Literacy · 2025

Source
Annual dropout rate — secondary level11.50 percent

Ministry of Education / UDISE+ · 2025

Source
PARAKH national average — Grade 3 language64.00 percent correct

PARAKH, NCERT · 2024

Source
PARAKH national average — Grade 6 mathematics46.00 percent correct

PARAKH, NCERT · 2024

Source
PARAKH national average — Grade 9 mathematics37.00 percent correct

PARAKH, NCERT · 2024

Source
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-58.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +36.0

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-58.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-42.4× 25%= -10.6 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -42.4 × 25% = -10.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For India, 741 crore passenger journeys, up 3.54% from 716 crore in FY 2024-25. This is journeys, not unique people.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-50.0× 35%= -17.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -50.0 × 35% = -17.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For India, metro daily passenger journeys: 11,500,000.00 passenger journeys/day

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-90.9× 25%= -22.7 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Original evidence -70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -90.9 × 25% = -22.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, people killed in road accidents: 180,000.00 people

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-53.0× 15%= -8.0 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -53.0 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, consequential railway accidents: 16.00 accidents

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.60 + -17.50 + -22.73 + -7.95 = -58.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +36.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +36.0. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+36.0 Original evidence category score+36.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 22.75 + -17.50 + 8.25 = 36.00

Base: 36.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +36.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 36.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.48 points

For India, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — mobility-reachability domestic evidence retained

For India, 741 crore passenger journeys, up 3.54% from 716 crore in FY 2024-25. This is journeys, not unique people.

2026-10-10 Ministry of Railways / Press Information Bureau

Published indicators

Indian Railways passenger journeys7,410,000,000.00 passenger journeys

Ministry of Railways / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
Operational metro network length1,155.00 km

Press Information Bureau / Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs · 2026

Source
Metro daily passenger journeys11,500,000.00 passenger journeys/day

Press Information Bureau / Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs · 2026

Source
People killed in road accidents180,000.00 people

Ministry of Road Transport & Highways · 2024

Source
Consequential railway accidents16.00 accidents

Ministry of Railways / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-59.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +32.8

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-59.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-47.0× 25%= -11.7 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -47.0 × 25% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For India, national TFR was 2.0, with 1.6 urban and 2.1 rural. This is the latest complete NFHS national measure and is retained with its survey period rather than presented as 2026 current.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-51.5× 35%= -18.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -51.5 × 35% = -18.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For India, pMMVY beneficiaries paid cumulatively: 43,200,000.00 beneficiaries

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-86.4× 25%= -21.6 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -86.4 × 25% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, women age 20-24 married before age 18: 23.30 percent

For India, women age 15-19 already mothers or pregnant: 6.80 percent

For India, sex ratio at birth: 930.00 girls per 1000 boys

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-56.1× 15%= -8.4 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -56.1 × 15% = -8.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For India, national TFR was 2.0, with 1.6 urban and 2.1 rural. This is the latest complete NFHS national measure and is retained with its survey period rather than presented as 2026 current.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.74 + -18.03 + -21.59 + -8.40 = -59.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +32.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +32.8. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -59.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+32.8 Original evidence category score+32.8 Contribution to national evidence score+2.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 21.00 + -13.75 + 6.75 = 32.75

Base: 32.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +32.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 32.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.69 points

For India, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +32.8

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: +32.8 − 0 = +32.8 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

2023 Supreme Court Supriyo decision declined to read marriage recognition into the Special Marriage Act; legislative recognition was not established. This is a legal-status finding, not a measured effect on fertility.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2023-10-17 · Reviewed: 2026-10-09

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — family-formation-stability domestic evidence retained

For India, national TFR was 2.0, with 1.6 urban and 2.1 rural. This is the latest complete NFHS national measure and is retained with its survey period rather than presented as 2026 current.

2026-10-10 Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

Published indicators

Total fertility rate2.00 children/woman

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare · 2021

Source
Women age 20-24 married before age 1823.30 percent

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare · 2021

Source
Women age 15-19 already mothers or pregnant6.80 percent

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare · 2021

Source
PMMVY beneficiaries paid cumulatively43,200,000.00 beneficiaries

Ministry of Women and Child Development · 2026

Source
Sex ratio at birth930.00 girls per 1000 boys

Ministry of Women and Child Development · 2024

Source
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-64.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +18.0

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-64.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-48.5× 25%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -48.5 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For India, all rural households. Agricultural households: 70.4% possessed less than 1 hectare; non-agricultural rural households: 98.9%. The age of the survey is explicit and is not presented as a 2026 landholding estimate.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-59.1× 35%= -20.7 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 1.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -59.1 × 35% = -20.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For India, rural households possessing 10 hectares or more: 0.20 percent

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-89.4× 25%= -22.4 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -89.4 × 25% = -22.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, rural households possessing less than 1 hectare of land: 83.50 percent

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-60.6× 15%= -9.1 points
Exact point calculation

30.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points

Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -60.6 × 15% = -9.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For India, all rural households. Agricultural households: 70.4% possessed less than 1 hectare; non-agricultural rural households: 98.9%. The age of the survey is explicit and is not presented as a 2026 landholding estimate.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.12 + -20.68 + -22.35 + -9.08 = -64.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +18.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +18.0. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+18.0 Original evidence category score+18.0 Contribution to national evidence score+0.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 17.50 + 12.25 + -16.25 + 4.50 = 18.00

Base: 18.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +18.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 18.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 0.92 points

For India, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +35.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — land-spatial-freedom domestic evidence retained

For India, all rural households. Agricultural households: 70.4% possessed less than 1 hectare; non-agricultural rural households: 98.9%. The age of the survey is explicit and is not presented as a 2026 landholding estimate.

2026-10-10 National Statistical Office, MoSPI

Published indicators

Rural households possessing less than 1 hectare of land83.50 percent

National Statistical Office, MoSPI · 2019

Source
Agricultural households as share of rural households54.00 percent

National Statistical Office, MoSPI · 2019

Source
Rural households possessing 10 hectares or more0.20 percent

National Statistical Office, MoSPI · 2019

Source
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-62.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence +23.8

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-62.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-50.0× 25%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -50.0 × 25% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

India’s average Cantril-ladder life evaluation was 4.536 in the 2026 report, based on Gallup World Poll 2023-2025. This is self-reported subjective wellbeing and is retained as such, not treated as a complete measure of beauty or quality of life.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-56.1× 35%= -19.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -56.1 × 35% = -19.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For India, average life evaluation: 4.54 0-10 scale

For India, participation in culture, leisure, mass-media and sports activities: 93.00 percent

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-87.9× 25%= -22.0 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -87.9 × 25% = -22.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

India’s average Cantril-ladder life evaluation was 4.536 in the 2026 report, based on Gallup World Poll 2023-2025. This is self-reported subjective wellbeing and is retained as such, not treated as a complete measure of beauty or quality of life.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-56.1× 15%= -8.4 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -56.1 × 15% = -8.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, time in culture, leisure, mass-media and sports per participant: 171.00 minutes/day

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.50 + -19.62 + -21.97 + -8.40 = -62.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +23.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +23.8. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -62.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+23.8 Original evidence category score+23.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 16.25 + 15.75 + -15.00 + 6.75 = 23.75

Base: 23.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +23.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 23.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.46 points

For India, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — peace-beauty-delight domestic evidence retained

India’s average Cantril-ladder life evaluation was 4.536 in the 2026 report, based on Gallup World Poll 2023-2025. This is self-reported subjective wellbeing and is retained as such, not treated as a complete measure of beauty or quality of life.

2026-10-10 World Happiness Report / Oxford Wellbeing Research Centre

Published indicators

Average life evaluation4.54 0-10 scale

World Happiness Report / Oxford Wellbeing Research Centre · 2025

Source
Participation in culture, leisure, mass-media and sports activities93.00 percent

National Statistical Office, MoSPI · 2024

Source
Time in culture, leisure, mass-media and sports per participant171.00 minutes/day

National Statistical Office, MoSPI · 2024

Source
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-58.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +35.8

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-58.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-47.0× 25%= -11.7 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -47.0 × 25% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For India, net increase includes 156 km² forest-cover increase and 1,289 km² tree-cover increase. A net national gain can coexist with local habitat loss or quality changes and is not treated as proof that all ecosystems are improving.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-51.5× 35%= -18.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -51.5 × 35% = -18.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For India, net increase includes 156 km² forest-cover increase and 1,289 km² tree-cover increase. A net national gain can coexist with local habitat loss or quality changes and is not treated as proof that all ecosystems are improving.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-86.4× 25%= -21.6 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -86.4 × 25% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, annual freshwater withdrawals as share of internal renewable resources: 45.00 percent

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-50.0× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -50.0 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.74 + -18.03 + -21.59 + -7.49 = -58.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +35.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +35.8. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+35.8 Original evidence category score+35.8 Contribution to national evidence score+2.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 21.00 + -13.75 + 9.75 = 35.75

Base: 35.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 35.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.20 points

For India, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — living-ground-resilience domestic evidence retained

For India, net increase includes 156 km² forest-cover increase and 1,289 km² tree-cover increase. A net national gain can coexist with local habitat loss or quality changes and is not treated as proof that all ecosystems are improving.

2026-10-10 Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change / Press Information Bureau

Published indicators

Forest and tree cover25.17 percent of geographical area

Forest Survey of India / Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change · 2023

Source
Increase in forest and tree cover since prior assessment1,445.81 sq km

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change / Press Information Bureau · 2023

Source
Notified protected areas1,134.00 protected areas

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
Ramsar wetlands101.00 sites

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
Annual freshwater withdrawals as share of internal renewable resources45.00 percent

World Bank · 2022

Source
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-62.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +22.8

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-62.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-48.5× 25%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -48.5 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For India, live national dashboard total at retrieval: 11,213,897 civil and 41,039,627 criminal cases. This measures pending caseload, not case quality or fault for delay.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-56.1× 35%= -19.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -56.1 × 35% = -19.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For India, live national dashboard total at retrieval: 11,213,897 civil and 41,039,627 criminal cases. This measures pending caseload, not case quality or fault for delay.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-92.4× 25%= -23.1 points
Exact point calculation

-75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -18.75 weighted points

Original evidence -75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -75.0; Money-gated reading -92.4 × 25% = -23.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, pending cases in district and subordinate courts: 52,253,524.00 cases

For India, pending district/subordinate court cases older than 10 years: 9.00 percent

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-53.0× 15%= -7.9 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -53.0 × 15% = -7.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, cases submitted through e-filing in High Courts and District Courts: 10,396,720.00 cases

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.12 + -19.62 + -23.11 + -7.94 = -62.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +22.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +22.8. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -62.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+22.8 Original evidence category score+22.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 17.50 + 15.75 + -18.75 + 8.25 = 22.75

Base: 22.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +22.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 22.75 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.17 points

For India, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — justice-safety-friction domestic evidence retained

For India, live national dashboard total at retrieval: 11,213,897 civil and 41,039,627 criminal cases. This measures pending caseload, not case quality or fault for delay.

2026-10-10 National Judicial Data Grid, eCourts Services

Published indicators

Pending cases in district and subordinate courts52,253,524.00 cases

National Judicial Data Grid, eCourts Services · 2026

Source
Pending district/subordinate court cases older than 10 years9.00 percent

National Judicial Data Grid, eCourts Services · 2026

Source
All-India prison occupancy rate120.80 percent

National Crime Records Bureau / Open Government Data Platform India · 2023

Source
Cases submitted through e-filing in High Courts and District Courts10,396,720.00 cases

Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice · 2025

Source
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-57.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +40.8

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-57.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-47.0× 25%= -11.7 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -47.0 × 25% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For India, the Department of Consumer Affairs describes the framework as giving consumers access to product information, service networks, genuine spare-part prices and repair options so products can be maintained or repaired by consumers or third parties rather than automatically replaced.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-50.0× 35%= -17.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -50.0 × 35% = -17.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For India, urban wards covered by door-to-door waste collection: 97.00 percent

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.3× 25%= -20.8 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.3 × 25% = -20.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For India, the Department of Consumer Affairs describes the framework as giving consumers access to product information, service networks, genuine spare-part prices and repair options so products can be maintained or repaired by consumers or third parties rather than automatically replaced.

For India, the Department of Consumer Affairs describes the framework as giving consumers access to product information, service networks, genuine spare-part prices and repair options so products can be maintained or repaired by consumers or third parties rather than automatically replaced.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-48.5× 15%= -7.3 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -48.5 × 15% = -7.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, the Department of Consumer Affairs describes the framework as giving consumers access to product information, service networks, genuine spare-part prices and repair options so products can be maintained or repaired by consumers or third parties rather than automatically replaced.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.74 + -17.50 + -20.83 + -7.27 = -57.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +40.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +40.8. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -57.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+40.8 Original evidence category score+40.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 22.75 + -11.25 + 10.50 = 40.75

Base: 40.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +40.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 40.75 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.67 points

For India, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — durability-material-return domestic evidence retained

For India, the Department of Consumer Affairs describes the framework as giving consumers access to product information, service networks, genuine spare-part prices and repair options so products can be maintained or repaired by consumers or third parties rather than automatically replaced.

2026-10-10 Department of Consumer Affairs — Right to Repair India
India operates a national Right to Repair portal and framework

For India, the Department of Consumer Affairs describes the framework as giving consumers access to product information, service networks, genuine spare-part prices and repair options so products can be maintained or repaired by consumers or third parties rather than automatically replaced.

2026-10-02 Department of Consumer Affairs — Right to Repair India

Published indicators

Urban wards covered by door-to-door waste collection97.00 percent

Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
Urban solid waste processing rate81.00 percent

Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
Legacy dumpsite waste remediated under SBM-Urban65.00 percent

Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs / Press Information Bureau · 2026

Source
E-waste collected, dismantled and recycled/disposed70.71 percent of generated e-waste

Central Pollution Control Board / Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change / PIB · 2025

Source
6% weight International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
-63.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +21.5

International score breakdown

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

-63.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Entry Accessibility 25%
See all nine International Welcome Entry Accessibility scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-47.0× 25%= -11.7 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -47.0 × 25% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

India lists eVisa eligibility for 175 nationalities, across several short-stay purposes; eVisa is not visa-free.

The Government of India e-Visa portal currently lists 175 eligible nationalities/regions and electronic visa routes including tourism, business, medical care, study, family and transit. Tourist visas include 30-day, one-year and five-year forms.

🤔
Migrant Practical Life 30%
See all nine International Welcome Migrant Practical Life scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.6× 30%= -17.3 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 12.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -57.6 × 30% = -17.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, eVisa admissions vary by nationality and category; residence and work permits follow distinct rules.

🤔
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome 25%
See all nine International Welcome Refugee / Neighbour Welcome scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.3× 25%= -20.8 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.3 × 25% = -20.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, uNHCR explains gaps in national refugee determination and identifies limitations in its own processing capacity.

UNHCR India states that it conducts refugee status determination only for asylum seekers with heightened protection needs and explains that UNHCR may conduct RSD where a state has not established the legal and institutional framework for the process. It also warns that some pending 2026 decisions may be delayed because of reduced staff capacity.

In January-February 2026 UNHCR India registered 309 asylum seekers and recorded departures through complementary pathways, resettlement and voluntary repatriation, alongside livelihood, food and emergency support activities.

🤔
Flexibility / Continuity 20%
See all nine International Welcome Flexibility / Continuity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-66.7× 20%= -13.3 points
Exact point calculation

10.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 2.00 weighted points

Original evidence +10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +10.0; Money-gated reading -66.7 × 20% = -13.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, humanitarian and complementary pathways exist but durable protection and family continuity require further independent tracking.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.74 + -17.27 + -20.83 + -13.33 = -63.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +21.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +21.5. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+21.5 Original evidence category score+21.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 12.00 + -11.25 + 2.00 = 21.50

Base: 21.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +21.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 21.50 × (6.00 × 80.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.06 points

For India, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 80% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.80%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — Flexibility / Continuity (international-access-human-welcome)

For India, humanitarian and complementary pathways exist but durable protection and family continuity require further independent tracking.

2026-10-10 UNHCR India
2026 full review — India — Refugee / Neighbour Welcome (international-access-human-welcome)

For India, uNHCR explains gaps in national refugee determination and identifies limitations in its own processing capacity.

2026-10-10 UNHCR India
2026 full review — India — Migrant Practical Life (international-access-human-welcome)

For India, eVisa admissions vary by nationality and category; residence and work permits follow distinct rules.

2026-10-10 India Government eVisa
2026 full review — India — Entry Accessibility (international-access-human-welcome)

India lists eVisa eligibility for 175 nationalities, across several short-stay purposes; eVisa is not visa-free.

2026-10-10 India Government eVisa
UNHCR protection pathway remains narrower than a complete national refugee-status system

UNHCR India states that it conducts refugee status determination only for asylum seekers with heightened protection needs and explains that UNHCR may conduct RSD where a state has not established the legal and institutional framework for the process. It also warns that some pending 2026 decisions may be delayed because of reduced staff capacity.

2026-10-02 UNHCR India
Current e-Visa system covers 175 listed countries/regions and multiple ordinary travel purposes

The Government of India e-Visa portal currently lists 175 eligible nationalities/regions and electronic visa routes including tourism, business, medical care, study, family and transit. Tourist visas include 30-day, one-year and five-year forms.

2026-10-02 Government of India — Indian Visa Online
UNHCR recorded active protection and durable-solution flows in early 2026

In January-February 2026 UNHCR India registered 309 asylum seekers and recorded departures through complementary pathways, resettlement and voluntary repatriation, alongside livelihood, food and emergency support activities.

2026-03-02 UNHCR

Published indicators

International migrant stock4,796,255.00 people

United Nations Population Division via World Bank · 2024

Source
Refugees and asylum seekers registered with UNHCR India48,342.00 people

UNHCR · 2026

Source
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-66.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence +12.3

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-66.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Positive Contribution 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-53.0× 25%= -13.3 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -53.0 × 25% = -13.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

India reports extensive development cooperation through credit, grants and technical training.

🤔
Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-59.1× 25%= -14.8 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -59.1 × 25% = -14.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, reported outward training and cooperation demonstrate specific relationships but cannot establish all local benefits.

🤔
Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-81.8× 35%= -28.6 points
Exact point calculation

-40.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -14.00 weighted points

Original evidence -40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -40.0; Money-gated reading -81.8 × 35% = -28.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For India, carbon emissions are substantial; the precise cross-border consumption and production allocation is not fully proven from a single series.

The research identified measurable carbon-footprint and outward-development indicators, but not a complete current ledger that attributes India’s overseas environmental damage, labour burdens, extraction, waste transfers and offsetting benefits with enough consistency for a neutral category score. The category therefore remains researched but unscored rather than manufacturing precision.

Global Carbon Budget data published through Our World in Data report India’s consumption-based fossil-fuel and industry CO₂ emissions at about 2.54 billion tonnes in 2023. Territorial emissions are reported separately at about 3.19 billion tonnes in 2024. The different accounting boundaries and years are retained explicitly; these figures do not by themselves establish where all cross-border environmental burdens fall.

🤔
Accountability / Repair 15%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-62.1× 15%= -9.3 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -62.1 × 15% = -9.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

India publishes cooperation projects; consistent independent recipient-impact and repair audits remain incomplete.

For India, the Ministry of External Affairs reports cumulative Lines of Credit of US$19.22156 billion and 177,782 capacity-building training and scholarship places/awards for 2014 through March 2026. MEA describes development cooperation as using grants, concessional credit, capacity building, technical assistance and humanitarian assistance.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.25 + -14.77 + -28.63 + -9.33 = -66.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +12.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +12.3. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -66.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+12.3 Original evidence category score+12.3 Contribution to national evidence score+0.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 8.75 + -14.00 + 3.75 = 12.25

Base: 12.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +12.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 12.25 × (6.00 × 78.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 0.59 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Exported waste / garbageTrade category reviewed · harm unverified

India — 2024 export of plastic waste and scrap. India exported 2,621,450 kg of plastic scrap in 2024, and separately imported plastic scrap; legal controls and treatment outcomes require direct destination checks. The customs heading identifies traded material; neither permitted recycling nor proven harmful dumping follows from the heading. Source-level trade measurement is verified, downstream disposition is not.

2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade · View source ↗

World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade, 2024 reporter imports/exports, HS 3915; not a downstream inspection

Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingTrade category reviewed · harm unverified

India — 2024 export of worn clothing and other worn articles. India imported 160,254,000 kg of worn clothing in 2024; neither positive reuse nor disguised disposal can be assumed without usable-share checks. A worn garment can be useful or trash; this audit has no shipment sorting/usable-share or recipient-facility record proving either outcome.

2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade · View source ↗

World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade, 2024 reporter imports/exports, HS 630900; not a downstream inspection

Accepted imported garbageTrade category reviewed · harm unverified

India — 2024 import of plastic waste and scrap. India exported 2,621,450 kg of plastic scrap in 2024, and separately imported plastic scrap; legal controls and treatment outcomes require direct destination checks. The customs heading identifies traded material; neither permitted recycling nor proven harmful dumping follows from the heading. Source-level trade measurement is verified, downstream disposition is not.

2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade · View source ↗

World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade, 2024 reporter imports/exports, HS 3915; not a downstream inspection

Accepted low-utility dumpingTrade category reviewed · harm unverified

India — 2024 import of worn clothing and other worn articles. India imported 160,254,000 kg of worn clothing in 2024; neither positive reuse nor disguised disposal can be assumed without usable-share checks. A worn garment can be useful or trash; this audit has no shipment sorting/usable-share or recipient-facility record proving either outcome.

2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade · View source ↗

World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade, 2024 reporter imports/exports, HS 630900; not a downstream inspection

2024 trade flows have been checked and linked above. Their harmful impact has not yet been independently verified; therefore no new deduction is assigned. Additional recipient-site evidence is required to close a harm audit.

For India, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 78% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.68%. After normalization across India’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026 full review — India — Accountability / Repair (external-footprint-non-extractive)

India publishes cooperation projects; consistent independent recipient-impact and repair audits remain incomplete.

2026-10-10 Ministry of External Affairs India
2026 full review — India — Documented Harm / Extraction (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For India, carbon emissions are substantial; the precise cross-border consumption and production allocation is not fully proven from a single series.

2026-10-10 Our World in Data
2026 full review — India — Mutuality / Local Benefit (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For India, reported outward training and cooperation demonstrate specific relationships but cannot establish all local benefits.

2026-10-10 Ministry of External Affairs India
2026 full review — India — Positive Contribution (external-footprint-non-extractive)

India reports extensive development cooperation through credit, grants and technical training.

2026-10-10 Ministry of External Affairs India
Comprehensive attributable cross-border harm evidence remains incomplete

The research identified measurable carbon-footprint and outward-development indicators, but not a complete current ledger that attributes India’s overseas environmental damage, labour burdens, extraction, waste transfers and offsetting benefits with enough consistency for a neutral category score. The category therefore remains researched but unscored rather than manufacturing precision.

2026-10-02 TBF Abundance research audit
India operates substantial outward development-finance and capacity-building programmes

For India, the Ministry of External Affairs reports cumulative Lines of Credit of US$19.22156 billion and 177,782 capacity-building training and scholarship places/awards for 2014 through March 2026. MEA describes development cooperation as using grants, concessional credit, capacity building, technical assistance and humanitarian assistance.

2026-03-31 Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India
Trade-adjusted carbon evidence is measurable, but not a complete external-harm account

Global Carbon Budget data published through Our World in Data report India’s consumption-based fossil-fuel and industry CO₂ emissions at about 2.54 billion tonnes in 2023. Territorial emissions are reported separately at about 3.19 billion tonnes in 2024. The different accounting boundaries and years are retained explicitly; these figures do not by themselves establish where all cross-border environmental burdens fall.

2024-12-31 Global Carbon Project / Our World in Data

Published indicators

Consumption-based CO₂ emissions2,540,000,000.00 tonnes CO2

Global Carbon Project / Our World in Data · 2023

Source
Territorial fossil-fuel and industry CO₂ emissions3,190,000,000.00 tonnes CO2

Global Carbon Project / Our World in Data · 2024

Source
Government of India development Lines of Credit, cumulative19,221.56 million USD

Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India · 2026

Source
Capacity-building training and scholarships, cumulative177,782.00 participants/awards

Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India · 2026

Source

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.