Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile
India 🇮🇳
India currently ranks #87 of 241 on the TBF Abundance Scorecard, scoring -59.94. This country is money-gated, strongest in Energy and weakest in External Footprint across 16 evidence categories.
Country profile & diagnostic reading
Tracking baselineEvidence through 9 Oct 2026How the headline score is calculated
Evidence before Gate = Σ (published category score × category weight × research coverage) ÷ Σ (category weight × research coverage). The five-part Money Gate sets a proportional ceiling, with Friction already in the category evidence score.
Current evidence: +32.2 · Money Gate: 4.25/20 · Cash-register lock: +78.8 · Graded pressure: +78.8 · Headline: -59.9.
The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.
TBF Rank TBF Rank Rank compares only published profiles. It follows the TBF Abundance Score, not GDP size, and can move when a country score changes or when another country enters the published table. Read Small Island Abundance Theory
Global standing based on life reachability
IndiaLast recorded move: up from #88 to #87.Recent recorded movements
- #88 → #8714 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500
- #89 → #8814 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500
- #90 → #8912 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500
- #89 → #9012 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500
Rank journey · newest first
Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.
National Abundance Gate Money Gate Food, Housing / Land, Healthcare, Transportation and Water / Energy are four points each. All five must reach 4/4 before the country can cross zero. Money may still exist as an exchange tool; it cannot remain the permission slip for these five basics. Read Money Is a Weak Civilization Engine
Graded status · five basics not fully cleared
Research Coverage Research coverage Coverage reports the weighted share of categories with documented scoring and supporting source records. 100% means all category scoring slots have been assessed; it does not guarantee that every claim has been independently measured or that every family has no-payment access. Read the source and evidence limitations for each point. Explore Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
Coverage calculation
Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:
9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 80.0% + 6.0 × 78.0% = 97.48% weighted coverage
Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.
14 / 14 domestic categories scored; 2 / 2 international categories with documented research (scores require full audit)
GDP Rank GDP Rank GDP rank is context only. It can show how much money and production move through an economy, but it contributes zero points to the TBF Abundance Score. Read Make the World Truly Productive Again
Shown for context, not as the abundance ranking
Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0
Five basics stand between this country and zero
All five basics must reach 4/4 before a country can cross zero. Open any gate reading to see exactly why its points were assigned and review the source record.
Food Food · 4 points Full credit means nutritious food is ordinary civilization provision without a checkout or poverty test. School meals and other narrow institutional routes can earn limited partial credit without being mistaken for free food abundance. Read A Civilization Laid Out in Orchards
Why 0.5 / 4?
PM POSHAN funds a daily cooked meal for eligible children in government and aided schools, not general household free meals.
Point calculation
0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Housing / Land Housing / Land · 4 points Full credit means families can secure a home or suitable productive ground without rent, purchase price or mortgage debt deciding whether they may remain sheltered and grounded. Read the Distributed Founding Nuclei Strategy
Why 1.0 / 4?
PMAY-U 2.0 gives subsidies and may give some landless families state-issued land rights, but most homes are constructed or purchased with additional resources.
Point calculation
1.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 25.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Healthcare Healthcare · 4 points Full credit requires dependable no-payment care across prevention, primary care, maternity, dentistry, medicine, emergency treatment and necessary specialist care. Read Money Zombie Outbreaks
Why 2.0 / 4?
Public Ayushman Arogya Mandir primary care is free to users and PM-JAY cashless hospitalization covers eligible households; coverage and eligibility limit universal access.
Point calculation
2.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 50.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Transportation Transportation · 4 points Full credit means ordinary movement is free across the routes people actually need. A free Sunday, one route or a temporary promotion earns only limited credit. Read The Caterport: Free Human Movement
Why 0.3 / 4?
Some states provide fare-free public buses to specific groups; most ordinary travel still involves payment and there is no all-India unconditional free route.
Point calculation
0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Water / Energy Water / Energy · 4 points Full credit requires both safe water and essential household energy to stay available without payment deciding whether cooking, cooling, washing, pumping or food preservation stops. Read Nucleus Formation Stewards
Why 0.5 / 4?
Rooftop-solar subsidies can produce up to 300 monthly units without a net energy charge for enrolled households; installation/eligibility and billed grid use constrain reach.
Point calculation
0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
- Food0.5 / 4
- Housing / Land1.0 / 4
- Healthcare2.0 / 4
- Transportation0.3 / 4
- Water / Energy0.5 / 4
- Money still needed15.8 / 20
Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.
Why 4.3 / 20?
The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.
Actual calculation
Food 0.50 + Housing / Land 1.00 + Healthcare 2.00 + Transportation 0.25 + Water / Energy 0.50 = 4.25 / 20
A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.
Why 78.8 / 100?
The five direct Money Gate readings total 0–20. Every point removes five of the 100 payment-lock units; a 7/20 reading produces a 65/100 lock.
Actual calculation
100 - (4.25 × 5) = 78.75
Why 78.0 / 100?
Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.
Actual calculation
(100 - -56.08) ÷ 2 = 78.04 / 100
The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.
Why -39.4?
Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.
Actual calculation
78.75 = 78.75 (Friction already counted in category scores)
-50 + 2.5 × 4.25 = -39.4
16-category profile
All categories at a glance
All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale once verified. International Welcome and External Footprint remain pending until their rail scores are properly researched. Select a category for sourced findings and transparent calculations.
Category readings & evidence
Open any category for the full diagnostic reading
9% weight
Human Time & Burden Return
What this category measures
Whether productivity, infrastructure and institutions return usable lifetime to people and families.
TBFC targetNecessary contribution should not require people to sell most of their waking life merely to retain access to food, shelter, care and ordinary family life. Access-gate research questionHow much paid work or income-producing activity is required before an ordinary household can keep access to basic life, and what usable family time remains afterward? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Family Shubaka: protecting human and family time
+20.0↓
Score breakdown
Human Time & Burden Return
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
All-India, rural+urban, person total, current weekly status. This is paid/economic activity and does not include unpaid domestic and care work.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
All-India, rural+urban, person total, current weekly status. This is paid/economic activity and does not include unpaid domestic and care work.
India 2024 national time-use survey found women aged 15–59 who performed unpaid domestic work averaged 305 minutes per day versus 86 minutes for men. Male paid-activity participants averaged 421 minutes and female participants 305.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
India 2024 national time-use survey found women aged 15–59 who performed unpaid domestic work averaged 305 minutes per day versus 86 minutes for men. Male paid-activity participants averaged 421 minutes and female participants 305.
Exact point calculation
20.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
All-India, rural+urban, person total, current weekly status. This is paid/economic activity and does not include unpaid domestic and care work.
India 2024 national time-use survey found women aged 15–59 who performed unpaid domestic work averaged 305 minutes per day versus 86 minutes for men. Male paid-activity participants averaged 421 minutes and female participants 305.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 16.25 + 15.75 + -15.00 + 3.00 = 20.00
Base: 20.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +20.0 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 20.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.85 points
This category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
All-India, rural+urban, person total, current weekly status. This is paid/economic activity and does not include unpaid domestic and care work.
2026-10-10 Ministry of Statistics and Programme ImplementationIndia 2024 national time-use survey found women aged 15–59 who performed unpaid domestic work averaged 305 minutes per day versus 86 minutes for men. Male paid-activity participants averaged 421 minutes and female participants 305.
2024-12-31 India National Statistics OfficePublished indicators
Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation · 2024
SourceMinistry of Statistics and Programme Implementation · 2024
SourceMinistry of Statistics and Programme Implementation · 2024
SourceMinistry of Statistics and Programme Implementation · 2024
Source
8% weight
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
What this category measures
Whether adequate shelter physically exists and actually reaches people without excessive cost, exclusion or vacancy mismatch.
TBFC targetAdequate family shelter should remain reachable without lifetime dependence on rent, mortgage debt or ability to pay. Access-gate research questionWhat share of ordinary shelter access depends on rent, mortgage debt, purchase price or other recurring payment, and what dependable non-market routes exist at national scale? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Mother-Sight compound home
+28.8↓
Score breakdown
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
Exact point calculation
80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Dashboard showed 100.26 lakh completed houses. This measures programme delivery capacity, not the total adequacy of India’s housing stock.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Dashboard showed 100.26 lakh completed houses. This measures programme delivery capacity, not the total adequacy of India’s housing stock.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
NHB 50-city housing price index annual change: 5.00 percent
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Dashboard showed 100.26 lakh completed houses. This measures programme delivery capacity, not the total adequacy of India’s housing stock.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 20.00 + 15.75 + -13.75 + 6.75 = 28.75
Base: 28.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +28.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 28.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.36 points
This category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +35.0
What the evidence found
Dashboard showed 100.26 lakh completed houses. This measures programme delivery capacity, not the total adequacy of India’s housing stock.
2026-10-10 Ministry of Housing and Urban AffairsPublished indicators
9% weight
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
What this category measures
Physical food and nutrient capacity, nourishment reach, waste/loss, public edible landscapes and free food access.
TBFC targetNutritious food should exist in multiplying abundance and remain reachable even when a household has no money to spend. Access-gate research questionCan people obtain adequate nutritious food when they cannot pay, and are free/public/productive-food routes large enough to be ordinary rather than exceptional? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Complete Reordering of Earth’s Food System
+43.3↓
Score breakdown
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
Exact point calculation
90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
About 80.67 crore persons were covered under NFSA at the time of the report. Coverage eligibility is not the same as nutritional adequacy.
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
People covered under National Food Security Act: 806,700,000.00 people
Free foodgrain entitlement for Priority Households: 5.00 kg/person/month
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Stunting among measured Anganwadi-enrolled children under five: 33.00 percent
Underweight among measured Anganwadi-enrolled children under five: 14.00 percent
Wasting among measured Anganwadi-enrolled children under five: 5.00 percent
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
About 80.67 crore persons were covered under NFSA at the time of the report. Coverage eligibility is not the same as nutritional adequacy.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 22.50 + 26.25 + -13.75 + 8.25 = 43.25
Base: 43.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +43.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 43.25 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 3.99 points
This category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +15.0
What the evidence found
About 80.67 crore persons were covered under NFSA at the time of the report. Coverage eligibility is not the same as nutritional adequacy.
2026-10-10 Department of Food and Public DistributionPublished indicators
Department of Food and Public Distribution · 2025
SourceDepartment of Food and Public Distribution · 2026
SourceMinistry of Women and Child Development / Press Information Bureau · 2025
SourceMinistry of Women and Child Development / Press Information Bureau · 2025
SourceMinistry of Women and Child Development / Press Information Bureau · 2025
Source
6% weight
Water & Sanitation Abundance
What this category measures
Safe water, sanitation, reliability, capture, reuse, storage and living-landscape water capacity.
TBFC targetSafe water and sanitation should be dependable life infrastructure, not conditional on household purchasing power. Access-gate research questionCan households retain safe water and sanitation when income falls, and which payment, disconnection or infrastructure barriers interrupt access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
+45.3↓
Score breakdown
Water & Sanitation Abundance
Exact point calculation
85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Reported by States/UTs under Jal Jeevan Mission: 15.89 crore of 19.36 crore rural households. This is rural household connection coverage, not an all-India urban+rural safely-managed-water measure.
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Rural households reported with tap water supply: 82.09 percent
Exact point calculation
-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Household tap connections meeting combined functionality test: 76.00 percent
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Villages attaining ODF Plus status: 96.00 percent
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 21.25 + 26.25 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 45.25
Base: 45.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +45.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 45.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.79 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +10.0
What the evidence found
Reported by States/UTs under Jal Jeevan Mission: 15.89 crore of 19.36 crore rural households. This is rural household connection coverage, not an all-India urban+rural safely-managed-water measure.
2026-10-10 Ministry of Jal Shakti / Press Information BureauPublished indicators
Ministry of Jal Shakti / Press Information Bureau · 2026
SourceMinistry of Jal Shakti / Press Information Bureau · 2024
SourceGovernment of India / Press Information Bureau · 2026
SourceGovernment of India / Press Information Bureau · 2026
Source
5% weight
Energy & Household Capability
What this category measures
Whether usable, reliable energy reaches households and removes burdens across water, food, health, cooling, cooking and movement.
TBFC targetEssential household energy should support cooking, cooling, water, food preservation and care without money becoming the switch that turns basic capability on or off. Access-gate research questionCan households retain essential energy for cooking, cooling, water and food preservation when they cannot pay, and how often does price or disconnection reduce capability? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Solar Moon Panel
+54.5↓
Score breakdown
Energy & Household Capability
Exact point calculation
90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
World Development Indicators estimate. Near-universal connection does not itself measure reliability, affordability, voltage quality or hours of service.
Exact point calculation
85.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 29.75 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Access to electricity: 99.90 percent
Free LPG connections provided under PMUY: 105,700,000.00 connections
Exact point calculation
-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
National energy shortage: 0.00 percent
Average annual LPG refills among PMUY beneficiaries: 4.71 refills/year
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Non-fossil share of installed electricity capacity: 54.40 percent
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 22.50 + 29.75 + -7.50 + 9.75 = 54.50
Base: 54.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +54.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 54.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.80 points
This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +5.0
What the evidence found
World Development Indicators estimate. Near-universal connection does not itself measure reliability, affordability, voltage quality or hours of service.
2026-10-10 World BankPublished indicators
World Bank · 2024
SourceMinistry of Power / Press Information Bureau · 2026
SourceMinistry of New and Renewable Energy / Press Information Bureau · 2026
SourceGovernment of India / Press Information Bureau · 2026
SourceGovernment of India / Press Information Bureau · 2026
Source
7% weight
Health & Care Reach
What this category measures
Whether prevention, primary care, medicine, maternity care, dentistry and specialist capability reach people when needed.
TBFC targetPrevention, maternity, dentistry, medicine and necessary treatment should be reachable because care is needed, not because payment can be produced. Access-gate research questionCan necessary care be obtained because it is needed, or do price, insurance, employment, debt or other financial tests materially delay or prevent access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: No Shrugging Our Shoulders at Family Suffering
+36.0↓
Score breakdown
Health & Care Reach
Exact point calculation
80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
World Development Indicators most recent value. This is an outcome measure, not a direct measure of service availability.
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Cashless hospital admissions authorized under AB-PMJAY: 126,900,000.00 admissions
Ayushman cards issued: 455,000,000.00 cards
Exact point calculation
-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Out-of-pocket expenditure as share of total health expenditure: 43.40 percent
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Life expectancy at birth: 72.00 years
Maternal mortality ratio: 88.00 deaths/100000 live births
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 20.00 + 22.75 + -15.00 + 8.25 = 36.00
Base: 36.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +36.0 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 36.00 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.59 points
This category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +15.0
What the evidence found
World Development Indicators most recent value. This is an outcome measure, not a direct measure of service availability.
2026-10-10 World BankPublished indicators
World Bank · 2024
SourceRegistrar General of India / Ministry of Health and Family Welfare · 2023
SourceMinistry of Health and Family Welfare / Press Information Bureau · 2026
SourceMinistry of Health and Family Welfare / Press Information Bureau · 2026
SourceMinistry of Health and Family Welfare / Press Information Bureau · 2023
Source
6% weight
Education & Human Capability
What this category measures
Foundational learning plus practical, technical and enduring civilization capability retained by people.
TBFC targetFoundational learning and useful capability should be reachable as part of civilization life rather than purchased according to family income. Access-gate research questionWhich essential learning and capability routes are genuinely reachable regardless of family income, and where do fees, debt or paid enrichment create decisive access gaps? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: What Is NoDumbDumbs?
+41.5↓
Score breakdown
Education & Human Capability
Exact point calculation
90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
UDISE+ collected individual student-wise data from recognized schools and reported 24.69 crore students. This is enrolment/reach, not evidence that all enrolled students are learning at grade level.
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Literacy rate, population age 7 years and above: 80.90 percent
Gross enrolment ratio — secondary stage: 68.50 percent
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Annual dropout rate — secondary level: 11.50 percent
PARAKH national average — Grade 6 mathematics: 46.00 percent correct
PARAKH national average — Grade 9 mathematics: 37.00 percent correct
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
PARAKH national average — Grade 3 language: 64.00 percent correct
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 22.50 + 24.50 + -13.75 + 8.25 = 41.50
Base: 41.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 41.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.55 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
UDISE+ collected individual student-wise data from recognized schools and reported 24.69 crore students. This is enrolment/reach, not evidence that all enrolled students are learning at grade level.
2026-10-10 Ministry of EducationPublished indicators
Ministry of Education · 2025
SourceMinistry of Education citing PLFS 2023-24 · 2024
SourceDepartment of School Education & Literacy · 2025
SourceMinistry of Education / UDISE+ · 2025
SourcePARAKH, NCERT · 2024
SourcePARAKH, NCERT · 2024
SourcePARAKH, NCERT · 2024
Source
4% weight
Mobility & Reachability
What this category measures
Local, regional and national movement that connects people to family, services, work, learning and public life without consuming excessive time.
TBFC targetOrdinary local and regional movement should be available for family, care, learning and civic life without travel becoming a paywall. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary people reach family, care, learning and public life without high recurring fares, vehicle costs, debt or fuel dependence? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Caterport: Free Human Movement
+36.0↓
Score breakdown
Mobility & Reachability
Exact point calculation
90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
741 crore passenger journeys, up 3.54% from 716 crore in FY 2024-25. This is journeys, not unique people.
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Metro daily passenger journeys: 11,500,000.00 passenger journeys/day
Exact point calculation
-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
People killed in road accidents: 180,000.00 people
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Consequential railway accidents: 16.00 accidents
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 22.50 + 22.75 + -17.50 + 8.25 = 36.00
Base: 36.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +36.0 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 36.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.48 points
This category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +25.0
What the evidence found
741 crore passenger journeys, up 3.54% from 716 crore in FY 2024-25. This is journeys, not unique people.
2026-10-10 Ministry of Railways / Press Information BureauPublished indicators
Ministry of Railways / Press Information Bureau · 2026
SourcePress Information Bureau / Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs · 2026
SourcePress Information Bureau / Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs · 2026
SourceMinistry of Road Transport & Highways · 2024
SourceMinistry of Railways / Press Information Bureau · 2026
Source
8% weight
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
What this category measures
Conditions that let people form stable families, raise children, multiply generations, share parental time and continue family life without punishing material barriers. New and re-reviewed profiles include total fertility as an explicit outcome signal.
TBFC targetPeople should be able to form, continue and multiply family life. Trott Bailey Family Civilization uses 5.0 children per woman as the fertility target; 2.1 is the replacement floor, not the aspiration, while housing, care, food and time should not be withheld behind financial thresholds. Access-gate research questionHow strongly do housing, childcare, health, food and work-income requirements delay or destabilize family formation and continuity, and is total fertility moving above replacement toward the 5.0-children-per-woman civilization target? Fertility methodNew and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Courtship, Marriage & Married Life
+32.8↓
Score breakdown
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
National TFR was 2.0, with 1.6 urban and 2.1 rural. This is the latest complete NFHS national measure and is retained with its survey period rather than presented as 2026 current.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
PMMVY beneficiaries paid cumulatively: 43,200,000.00 beneficiaries
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Women age 20-24 married before age 18: 23.30 percent
Women age 15-19 already mothers or pregnant: 6.80 percent
Sex ratio at birth: 930.00 girls per 1000 boys
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
National TFR was 2.0, with 1.6 urban and 2.1 rural. This is the latest complete NFHS national measure and is retained with its survey period rather than presented as 2026 current.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 21.00 + -13.75 + 6.75 = 32.75
Base: 32.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +32.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 32.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.69 points
This category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion
First half — the established family and fertility assessment
The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.
Pre-policy score: +32.8
Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion
This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.
Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence
Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points
Final category calculation: +32.8 − 0 = +32.8 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)
2023 Supreme Court Supriyo decision declined to read marriage recognition into the Special Marriage Act; legislative recognition was not established. This is a legal-status finding, not a measured effect on fertility.
Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2023-10-17 · Reviewed: 2026-10-09
Fertility and family policy: research and source notes
Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.
How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.
How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.
Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).
Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.
Abundance Gap: +15.0
What the evidence found
National TFR was 2.0, with 1.6 urban and 2.1 rural. This is the latest complete NFHS national measure and is retained with its survey period rather than presented as 2026 current.
2026-10-10 Ministry of Health and Family WelfarePublished indicators
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare · 2021
SourceMinistry of Health and Family Welfare · 2021
SourceMinistry of Health and Family Welfare · 2021
SourceMinistry of Women and Child Development · 2026
SourceMinistry of Women and Child Development · 2024
Source
5% weight
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
What this category measures
Whether land and settlement choice reach ordinary people rather than opportunity being functionally trapped inside expensive commercial centres.
TBFC targetSuitable productive land and settlement opportunity should not be functionally reserved for those able to outbid everyone else. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary families gain secure use of suitable productive ground without first accumulating enough money to purchase, finance or outbid others? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Compounds Are Civilization Circulation Systems
+18.0↓
Score breakdown
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
All rural households. Agricultural households: 70.4% possessed less than 1 hectare; non-agricultural rural households: 98.9%. The age of the survey is explicit and is not presented as a 2026 landholding estimate.
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Rural households possessing 10 hectares or more: 0.20 percent
Exact point calculation
-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Rural households possessing less than 1 hectare of land: 83.50 percent
Exact point calculation
30.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
All rural households. Agricultural households: 70.4% possessed less than 1 hectare; non-agricultural rural households: 98.9%. The age of the survey is explicit and is not presented as a 2026 landholding estimate.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 12.25 + -16.25 + 4.50 = 18.00
Base: 18.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +18.0 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 18.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 0.92 points
This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +35.0
What the evidence found
All rural households. Agricultural households: 70.4% possessed less than 1 hectare; non-agricultural rural households: 98.9%. The age of the survey is explicit and is not presented as a 2026 landholding estimate.
2026-10-10 National Statistical Office, MoSPIPublished indicators
National Statistical Office, MoSPI · 2019
SourceNational Statistical Office, MoSPI · 2019
SourceNational Statistical Office, MoSPI · 2019
Source
6% weight
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
What this category measures
Peace of mind, social support, everyday safety, public beauty, recreation, nature, culture and delight reachable without constant payment.
TBFC targetBeauty, nature, recreation, rest and public delight should belong to ordinary life rather than appearing mainly after payment. Access-gate research questionHow much everyday rest, nature, recreation, culture and public beauty is freely reachable, rather than principally accessed through paid venues, travel or private property? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
+23.8↓
Score breakdown
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
India’s average Cantril-ladder life evaluation was 4.536 in the 2026 report, based on Gallup World Poll 2023-2025. This is self-reported subjective wellbeing and is retained as such, not treated as a complete measure of beauty or quality of life.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Average life evaluation: 4.54 0-10 scale
Participation in culture, leisure, mass-media and sports activities: 93.00 percent
Exact point calculation
-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
India’s average Cantril-ladder life evaluation was 4.536 in the 2026 report, based on Gallup World Poll 2023-2025. This is self-reported subjective wellbeing and is retained as such, not treated as a complete measure of beauty or quality of life.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Time in culture, leisure, mass-media and sports per participant: 171.00 minutes/day
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 16.25 + 15.75 + -15.00 + 6.75 = 23.75
Base: 23.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +23.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 23.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.46 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
India’s average Cantril-ladder life evaluation was 4.536 in the 2026 report, based on Gallup World Poll 2023-2025. This is self-reported subjective wellbeing and is retained as such, not treated as a complete measure of beauty or quality of life.
2026-10-10 World Happiness Report / Oxford Wellbeing Research CentrePublished indicators
World Happiness Report / Oxford Wellbeing Research Centre · 2025
SourceNational Statistical Office, MoSPI · 2024
SourceNational Statistical Office, MoSPI · 2024
Source
6% weight
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
What this category measures
Whether soil, forests, wetlands, habitat, pollinators, species and water-holding landscapes are strengthening rather than being consumed.
TBFC targetRegenerating soil, water, habitat and food-bearing landscapes should be maintained as shared life-supporting capacity rather than only where a transaction makes them profitable. Access-gate research questionAre regenerative land, water and habitat functions maintained as life-supporting infrastructure even when no direct commercial return is available? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
+35.8↓
Score breakdown
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Net increase includes 156 km² forest-cover increase and 1,289 km² tree-cover increase. A net national gain can coexist with local habitat loss or quality changes and is not treated as proof that all ecosystems are improving.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Net increase includes 156 km² forest-cover increase and 1,289 km² tree-cover increase. A net national gain can coexist with local habitat loss or quality changes and is not treated as proof that all ecosystems are improving.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Annual freshwater withdrawals as share of internal renewable resources: 45.00 percent
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Increase in forest and tree cover since prior assessment: 1,445.81 sq km
Ramsar wetlands: 101.00 sites
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 21.00 + -13.75 + 9.75 = 35.75
Base: 35.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 35.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.20 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +15.0
What the evidence found
Net increase includes 156 km² forest-cover increase and 1,289 km² tree-cover increase. A net national gain can coexist with local habitat loss or quality changes and is not treated as proof that all ecosystems are improving.
2026-10-10 Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change / Press Information BureauPublished indicators
Forest Survey of India / Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change · 2023
SourceMinistry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change / Press Information Bureau · 2023
SourceMinistry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change / Press Information Bureau · 2026
SourceMinistry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change / Press Information Bureau · 2026
SourceWorld Bank · 2022
Source
5% weight
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
What this category measures
Physical safety, usable justice, legal identity, reliable public administration and low needless institutional burden.
TBFC targetUsable justice, legal identity, safety and ordinary administration should remain accessible regardless of wealth. Access-gate research questionDo fees, legal costs, bail, fines, documentation costs or ability to hire expertise materially change access to justice, safety or public administration? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Pacorips Constitutional Foundations
+22.8↓
Score breakdown
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Live national dashboard total at retrieval: 11,213,897 civil and 41,039,627 criminal cases. This measures pending caseload, not case quality or fault for delay.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Live national dashboard total at retrieval: 11,213,897 civil and 41,039,627 criminal cases. This measures pending caseload, not case quality or fault for delay.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -18.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Pending cases in district and subordinate courts: 52,253,524.00 cases
Pending district/subordinate court cases older than 10 years: 9.00 percent
All-India prison occupancy rate: 120.80 percent
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Cases submitted through e-filing in High Courts and District Courts: 10,396,720.00 cases
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 15.75 + -18.75 + 8.25 = 22.75
Base: 22.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +22.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 22.75 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.17 points
This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +25.0
What the evidence found
Live national dashboard total at retrieval: 11,213,897 civil and 41,039,627 criminal cases. This measures pending caseload, not case quality or fault for delay.
2026-10-10 National Judicial Data Grid, eCourts ServicesPublished indicators
National Judicial Data Grid, eCourts Services · 2026
SourceNational Judicial Data Grid, eCourts Services · 2026
SourceNational Crime Records Bureau / Open Government Data Platform India · 2023
SourceDepartment of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice · 2025
Source
4% weight
Durability, Repair & Material Return
What this category measures
Whether useful materials, infrastructure and goods are maintained, repairable, recovered and cycled instead of repeatedly becoming waste.
TBFC targetRepair, maintenance and useful material circulation should protect capability instead of forcing repeated repurchase as the default route to continued use. Access-gate research questionDo repair and maintenance remain practically accessible, or do pricing, proprietary restrictions and replacement incentives turn continued use into repeated purchasing? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Repair Is Sovereignty
+40.8↓
Score breakdown
Durability, Repair & Material Return
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
The Department of Consumer Affairs describes the framework as giving consumers access to product information, service networks, genuine spare-part prices and repair options so products can be maintained or repaired by consumers or third parties rather than automatically replaced.
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Urban wards covered by door-to-door waste collection: 97.00 percent
Exact point calculation
-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
The Department of Consumer Affairs describes the framework as giving consumers access to product information, service networks, genuine spare-part prices and repair options so products can be maintained or repaired by consumers or third parties rather than automatically replaced.
The Department of Consumer Affairs describes the framework as giving consumers access to product information, service networks, genuine spare-part prices and repair options so products can be maintained or repaired by consumers or third parties rather than automatically replaced.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
The Department of Consumer Affairs describes the framework as giving consumers access to product information, service networks, genuine spare-part prices and repair options so products can be maintained or repaired by consumers or third parties rather than automatically replaced.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 22.75 + -11.25 + 10.50 = 40.75
Base: 40.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +40.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 40.75 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.67 points
This category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +10.0
What the evidence found
The Department of Consumer Affairs describes the framework as giving consumers access to product information, service networks, genuine spare-part prices and repair options so products can be maintained or repaired by consumers or third parties rather than automatically replaced.
2026-10-10 Department of Consumer Affairs — Right to Repair IndiaThe Department of Consumer Affairs describes the framework as giving consumers access to product information, service networks, genuine spare-part prices and repair options so products can be maintained or repaired by consumers or third parties rather than automatically replaced.
2026-10-02 Department of Consumer Affairs — Right to Repair IndiaPublished indicators
Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs / Press Information Bureau · 2026
SourceMinistry of Housing & Urban Affairs / Press Information Bureau · 2026
SourceMinistry of Housing & Urban Affairs / Press Information Bureau · 2026
SourceCentral Pollution Control Board / Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change / PIB · 2025
Source
6% weight
International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
What this category measures
How easily visitors, migrants, refugees and neighbouring families can enter, remain, regularize status, prevent statelessness, build family continuity and participate in ordinary civic and economic life.
TBFC targetA country should have a humane vision for visitors, migrants, refugees and neighbouring families: practical entry, legal identity, family continuity, protection from statelessness, a route into ordinary life and a real place to contribute and grow with the society. Access-gate research questionWho can enter and stay, how wide is visa-free/eVisa/eTA reach, can newcomers regularize status and work, are refugees and children protected from statelessness, can families remain together, and does the country have a practical long-term vision for newcomers to join ordinary life and contribute? International scoring method
Welcome research checks practical entry breadth, visa-free/eVisa/eTA reach, lawful passport or citizenship pathways available to foreigners, birthright citizenship and statelessness prevention, parent/child family-status continuity, refugee recognition, migrant regularization, work/school/health access, family reunion and a credible national vision for newcomers to settle, contribute and grow with society.
A verified eVisa program open to more than 100 nationalities is recorded as a positive factual Welcome finding (the historical +5 scoring rule is retired). Researchers must verify the eligible-nationality breadth, not merely the existence of an online visa form. A lawful international citizenship/passport route available to qualifying foreigners is recorded as a Welcome access finding. The score must distinguish a usable transparent route from an expensive, narrow or highly discretionary program. Broad birthright citizenship, conditional territorial citizenship and statelessness safeguards are recorded with their precise legal eligibility and practical results. A system that leaves children without effective nationality, identity or durable status is a serious negative. A practical route that lets parents secure residence or citizenship through a child born in the country is documented for family-continuity review; long limbo, family separation or rules that strand the child between statuses reduce the score.
Refugee and migrant welcome is judged by lived access as well as admission: recognition, non-refoulement, legal documents, work, education, health care, family continuity, regularization, permanence and citizenship pathways all matter. Forced removal, refoulement, arbitrary detention, family separation and especially deporting or transferring people to unrelated third countries without a genuine durable-protection connection are negative Welcome evidence. Welcome is stronger when the country has a coherent plan for land, housing, work, contribution, family life and civic integration so newcomers are absorbed as people who can help the country grow, rather than warehoused indefinitely in camps or temporary limbo.
Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Refugee Living Should Be Glamorous, Purposeful and Liberating
+21.5↓
International score breakdown
International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
India lists eVisa eligibility for 175 nationalities, across several short-stay purposes; eVisa is not visa-free.
The Government of India e-Visa portal currently lists 175 eligible nationalities/regions and electronic visa routes including tourism, business, medical care, study, family and transit. Tourist visas include 30-day, one-year and five-year forms.
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 12.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
eVisa admissions vary by nationality and category; residence and work permits follow distinct rules.
Exact point calculation
-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
UNHCR explains gaps in national refugee determination and identifies limitations in its own processing capacity.
UNHCR India states that it conducts refugee status determination only for asylum seekers with heightened protection needs and explains that UNHCR may conduct RSD where a state has not established the legal and institutional framework for the process. It also warns that some pending 2026 decisions may be delayed because of reduced staff capacity.
In January-February 2026 UNHCR India registered 309 asylum seekers and recorded departures through complementary pathways, resettlement and voluntary repatriation, alongside livelihood, food and emergency support activities.
Exact point calculation
10.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 2.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Humanitarian and complementary pathways exist but durable protection and family continuity require further independent tracking.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 12.00 + -11.25 + 2.00 = 21.50
Base: 21.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +21.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 21.50 × (6.00 × 80.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.06 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 80% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.80%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
What the evidence found
Humanitarian and complementary pathways exist but durable protection and family continuity require further independent tracking.
2026-10-10 UNHCR IndiaUNHCR explains gaps in national refugee determination and identifies limitations in its own processing capacity.
2026-10-10 UNHCR IndiaeVisa admissions vary by nationality and category; residence and work permits follow distinct rules.
2026-10-10 India Government eVisaIndia lists eVisa eligibility for 175 nationalities, across several short-stay purposes; eVisa is not visa-free.
2026-10-10 India Government eVisaUNHCR India states that it conducts refugee status determination only for asylum seekers with heightened protection needs and explains that UNHCR may conduct RSD where a state has not established the legal and institutional framework for the process. It also warns that some pending 2026 decisions may be delayed because of reduced staff capacity.
2026-10-02 UNHCR IndiaThe Government of India e-Visa portal currently lists 175 eligible nationalities/regions and electronic visa routes including tourism, business, medical care, study, family and transit. Tourist visas include 30-day, one-year and five-year forms.
2026-10-02 Government of India — Indian Visa OnlineIn January-February 2026 UNHCR India registered 309 asylum seekers and recorded departures through complementary pathways, resettlement and voluntary repatriation, alongside livelihood, food and emergency support activities.
2026-03-02 UNHCRPublished indicators
6% weight
External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
What this category measures
Documented effects a country, its public institutions or materially supported programs have beyond its borders: beneficial contribution, medical and technical help, mutuality, external harm, extraction, accountability and repair.
TBFC targetA civilization should increase useful local capability beyond its borders through medicine, training, disaster help, technical cooperation, peace-building and other mutually useful contribution, while avoiding extraction, exported harm and displacement. Access-gate research questionDo the country’s actions abroad increase health, skill, safety, resilience and locally retained capability, or do they export extraction, coercion, environmental harm, displacement, debt or other burdens? International scoring method
Legacy method: External Footprint documents independently verified beneficial action beyond the border, including medical missions, public-health help, scholarships, training, technical cooperation, disaster relief, humanitarian logistics, peacekeeping and other programs that leave useful capability with the receiving society. It also documents extractive conduct, exported environmental or human harm, coercive external security practices, abusive displacement outsourcing and whether documented harm is repaired, with a separately scored 6% category once four evidence-backed rails have been reviewed. Verified waste exports and disguised low-utility dumping are penalized through the transboundary harm ledger, as are irresponsible import acceptance practices through Domestic Durability & Material Return.
International contribution is investigated relative to capacity and quality, not raw size alone; documented outward activity is distinguished from independent benefit and local mutuality.
Dumping and harmful material transfers
Waste or disguised low-utility exports reduce External Footprint. Real reuse must be distinguished from disguised disposal. The sender retains responsibility for harms shifted abroad. Method v3: harmful imported garbage and low-utility dumping belong in External Footprint, where inbound transfer responsibility is 15% of the category. Historical method v2 import deductions remain archived under Domestic Durability until that country receives a sourced v3 score. Do not double-count.
Read the Trott Bailey Family work: When Another Nation Cleans Up Your Garbage
+12.3↓
International score breakdown
External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
India reports extensive development cooperation through credit, grants and technical training.
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Reported outward training and cooperation demonstrate specific relationships but cannot establish all local benefits.
Exact point calculation
-40.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -14.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Carbon emissions are substantial; the precise cross-border consumption and production allocation is not fully proven from a single series.
The research identified measurable carbon-footprint and outward-development indicators, but not a complete current ledger that attributes India’s overseas environmental damage, labour burdens, extraction, waste transfers and offsetting benefits with enough consistency for a neutral category score. The category therefore remains researched but unscored rather than manufacturing precision.
Global Carbon Budget data published through Our World in Data report India’s consumption-based fossil-fuel and industry CO₂ emissions at about 2.54 billion tonnes in 2023. Territorial emissions are reported separately at about 3.19 billion tonnes in 2024. The different accounting boundaries and years are retained explicitly; these figures do not by themselves establish where all cross-border environmental burdens fall.
Exact point calculation
25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
India publishes cooperation projects; consistent independent recipient-impact and repair audits remain incomplete.
The Ministry of External Affairs reports cumulative Lines of Credit of US$19.22156 billion and 177,782 capacity-building training and scholarship places/awards for 2014 through March 2026. MEA describes development cooperation as using grants, concessional credit, capacity building, technical assistance and humanitarian assistance.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 13.75 + 8.75 + -14.00 + 3.75 = 12.25
Base: 12.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +12.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 12.25 × (6.00 × 78.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 0.59 points
Material transfers: scored in International Footprint
Exporter responsibility: 10.00/100 (15% of footprint); importer responsibility: -30.00/100 (15% of footprint). Material movement is a real workload; these are TBF authored judgments, not certified illegal dumping estimates. Each role is included ONCE in the Footprint 3.1 published score.
India — 2024 export of plastic waste and scrap. India exported 2,621,450 kg of plastic scrap in 2024, and separately imported plastic scrap; legal controls and treatment outcomes require direct destination checks. The customs heading identifies traded material; neither permitted recycling nor proven harmful dumping follows from the heading. Source-level trade measurement is verified, downstream disposition is not.
2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade · View source ↗
World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade, 2024 reporter imports/exports, HS 3915; not a downstream inspection
India — 2024 export of worn clothing and other worn articles. India imported 160,254,000 kg of worn clothing in 2024; neither positive reuse nor disguised disposal can be assumed without usable-share checks. A worn garment can be useful or trash; this audit has no shipment sorting/usable-share or recipient-facility record proving either outcome.
2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade · View source ↗
World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade, 2024 reporter imports/exports, HS 630900; not a downstream inspection
India — 2024 import of plastic waste and scrap. India exported 2,621,450 kg of plastic scrap in 2024, and separately imported plastic scrap; legal controls and treatment outcomes require direct destination checks. The customs heading identifies traded material; neither permitted recycling nor proven harmful dumping follows from the heading. Source-level trade measurement is verified, downstream disposition is not.
2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade · View source ↗
World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade, 2024 reporter imports/exports, HS 3915; not a downstream inspection
India — 2024 import of worn clothing and other worn articles. India imported 160,254,000 kg of worn clothing in 2024; neither positive reuse nor disguised disposal can be assumed without usable-share checks. A worn garment can be useful or trash; this audit has no shipment sorting/usable-share or recipient-facility record proving either outcome.
2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade · View source ↗
World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade, 2024 reporter imports/exports, HS 630900; not a downstream inspection
The material-transfer burden already affects the published score. Facility-specific downstream harm remains a separate research claim. No second penalty is added for the same trade.
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 78% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.68%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
What the evidence found
India publishes cooperation projects; consistent independent recipient-impact and repair audits remain incomplete.
2026-10-10 Ministry of External Affairs IndiaCarbon emissions are substantial; the precise cross-border consumption and production allocation is not fully proven from a single series.
2026-10-10 Our World in DataReported outward training and cooperation demonstrate specific relationships but cannot establish all local benefits.
2026-10-10 Ministry of External Affairs IndiaIndia reports extensive development cooperation through credit, grants and technical training.
2026-10-10 Ministry of External Affairs IndiaThe research identified measurable carbon-footprint and outward-development indicators, but not a complete current ledger that attributes India’s overseas environmental damage, labour burdens, extraction, waste transfers and offsetting benefits with enough consistency for a neutral category score. The category therefore remains researched but unscored rather than manufacturing precision.
2026-10-02 TBF Abundance research auditThe Ministry of External Affairs reports cumulative Lines of Credit of US$19.22156 billion and 177,782 capacity-building training and scholarship places/awards for 2014 through March 2026. MEA describes development cooperation as using grants, concessional credit, capacity building, technical assistance and humanitarian assistance.
2026-03-31 Ministry of External Affairs, Government of IndiaGlobal Carbon Budget data published through Our World in Data report India’s consumption-based fossil-fuel and industry CO₂ emissions at about 2.54 billion tonnes in 2023. Territorial emissions are reported separately at about 3.19 billion tonnes in 2024. The different accounting boundaries and years are retained explicitly; these figures do not by themselves establish where all cross-border environmental burdens fall.
2024-12-31 Global Carbon Project / Our World in DataPublished indicators
Global Carbon Project / Our World in Data · 2023
SourceGlobal Carbon Project / Our World in Data · 2024
SourceMinistry of External Affairs, Government of India · 2026
SourceMinistry of External Affairs, Government of India · 2026
SourceTrott Bailey Family Civilization Target
The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping
Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.
This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.
and then 
