Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Authored Civilization Benchmark
Trott Bailey Family Civilization
Trott Bailey Family Civilization is the authored abundance benchmark for the Global Scorecard, measuring access to life, family time and the capacity to live well.
Civilization benchmark & diagnostic reading
Tracking baselineHistorical tracking baselineHow the headline score is calculated
Evidence before Gate = Σ (published category score × category weight × research coverage) ÷ Σ (category weight × research coverage). The five-part Money Gate sets a proportional ceiling, with Friction already in the category evidence score.
Current evidence: +97.3 · Money Gate: 20.00/20 · Cash-register lock: 0.0 · Graded pressure: 0.0 · Headline: +97.3.
The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.
TBF Rank TBF Rank Rank compares only published profiles. It follows the TBF Abundance Score, not GDP size, and can move when a country score changes or when another country enters the published table. Read Small Island Abundance Theory
Global standing based on life reachability
Trott Bailey Family CivilizationHeld position. Previous position: #1. Current position: #1.No earlier rank movement is recorded yet.
National Abundance Gate Money Gate Food, Housing / Land, Healthcare, Transportation and Water / Energy are four points each. All five must reach 4/4 before the country can cross zero. Money may still exist as an exchange tool; it cannot remain the permission slip for these five basics. Read Money Is a Weak Civilization Engine
Five basics have cleared the national gate
Research Coverage Research coverage Coverage reports the weighted share of categories with documented scoring and supporting source records. 100% means all category scoring slots have been assessed; it does not guarantee that every claim has been independently measured or that every family has no-payment access. Read the source and evidence limitations for each point. Explore Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
Coverage calculation
Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:
9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% = 100.00% weighted coverage
Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.
14 / 14 domestic categories scored; 2 / 2 international categories with documented research (scores require full audit)
GDP Rank GDP Rank GDP rank is context only. It can show how much money and production move through an economy, but it contributes zero points to the TBF Abundance Score. Read Make the World Truly Productive Again
Shown for context, not as the abundance ranking
Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0
Money Gate cleared
Food, housing / land, healthcare, transportation and water / energy each reach 4/4, so the national gate no longer caps the evidence score below zero.
Food Food · 4 points Full credit means nutritious food is ordinary civilization provision without a checkout or poverty test. School meals and other narrow institutional routes can earn limited partial credit without being mistaken for free food abundance. Read A Civilization Laid Out in Orchards
Why 4.0 / 4?
4/4 requires ordinary, dependable, nutritious food access without a checkout, poverty test or institutional confinement. Food must be part of normal civilization provision, not occasional charity.
Point calculation
4.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 100.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Housing / Land Housing / Land · 4 points Full credit means families can secure a home or suitable productive ground without rent, purchase price or mortgage debt deciding whether they may remain sheltered and grounded. Read the Distributed Founding Nuclei Strategy
Why 4.0 / 4?
4/4 requires dependable ordinary access to secure housing and/or productive land sufficient for family life without money deciding who may remain sheltered or grounded.
Point calculation
4.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 100.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Healthcare Healthcare · 4 points Full credit requires dependable no-payment care across prevention, primary care, maternity, dentistry, medicine, emergency treatment and necessary specialist care. Read Money Zombie Outbreaks
Why 4.0 / 4?
4/4 requires dependable no-payment access across prevention, primary care, maternity, dentistry, medicines, emergency treatment and necessary specialist care, with real reach rather than a paper entitlement.
Point calculation
4.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 100.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Transportation Transportation · 4 points Full credit means ordinary movement is free across the routes people actually need. A free Sunday, one route or a temporary promotion earns only limited credit. Read The Caterport: Free Human Movement
Why 4.0 / 4?
4/4 requires ordinary movement to be structurally free across the transport network people actually need, not one ceremonial route or a rare promotion.
Point calculation
4.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 100.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Water / Energy Water / Energy · 4 points Full credit requires both safe water and essential household energy to stay available without payment deciding whether cooking, cooling, washing, pumping or food preservation stops. Read Nucleus Formation Stewards
Why 4.0 / 4?
4/4 requires both essential water and household energy to remain dependable life infrastructure without payment deciding whether the tap, pump, cooker, light or cooling stops.
Point calculation
4.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 100.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
- Food4.0 / 4
- Housing / Land4.0 / 4
- Healthcare4.0 / 4
- Transportation4.0 / 4
- Water / Energy4.0 / 4
- Money still needed0.0 / 20
Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.
Why 20.0 / 20?
The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.
Actual calculation
Food 4.00 + Housing / Land 4.00 + Healthcare 4.00 + Transportation 4.00 + Water / Energy 4.00 = 20.00 / 20
A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.
Why 0.0 / 100?
The five direct Money Gate readings total 0–20. Every point removes five of the 100 payment-lock units; a 7/20 reading produces a 65/100 lock.
Actual calculation
100 - (20.00 × 5) = 0.00
Why 2.0 / 100?
Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.
Actual calculation
(100 - 96.00) ÷ 2 = 2.00 / 100
The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.
Why no ceiling is applied
Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.
Actual calculation
0.00 = 0.00 (Friction already counted in category scores)
The Money Gate is cleared, so the negative ceiling is no longer applied and the evidence score becomes the headline score directly.
16-category profile
All categories at a glance
All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale once verified. International Welcome and External Footprint remain pending until their rail scores are properly researched. Select a category for sourced findings and transparent calculations.
Category readings & evidence
Open any category for the full diagnostic reading
9% weight
Human Time & Burden Return
What this category measures
Whether productivity, infrastructure and institutions return usable lifetime to people and families.
TBFC targetNecessary contribution should not require people to sell most of their waking life merely to retain access to food, shelter, care and ordinary family life. Access-gate research questionHow much paid work or income-producing activity is required before an ordinary household can keep access to basic life, and what usable family time remains afterward? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Family Shubaka: protecting human and family time
+97.3↓
Score breakdown
Human Time & Burden Return
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Human time is returned to family life. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.95 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Human time is returned to family life. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Human time is returned to family life. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 14.85 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Human time is returned to family life. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.95 + 24.00 + 14.85 = 97.30
Base: 97.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.30 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 8.76 points
This category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +8.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +1.0
What the evidence found
Human time is returned to family life. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
A Civilization Where People Do Not Work Like they do in the Current World
8% weight
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
What this category measures
Whether adequate shelter physically exists and actually reaches people without excessive cost, exclusion or vacancy mismatch.
TBFC targetAdequate family shelter should remain reachable without lifetime dependence on rent, mortgage debt or ability to pay. Access-gate research questionWhat share of ordinary shelter access depends on rent, mortgage debt, purchase price or other recurring payment, and what dependable non-market routes exist at national scale? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Mother-Sight compound home
+97.3↓
Score breakdown
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Family-scale housing is treated as civilization infrastructure. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.95 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Family-scale housing is treated as civilization infrastructure. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Family-scale housing is treated as civilization infrastructure. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 14.85 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Family-scale housing is treated as civilization infrastructure. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.95 + 24.00 + 14.85 = 97.30
Base: 97.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.30 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 7.78 points
This category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +7.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +1.0
What the evidence found
Family-scale housing is treated as civilization infrastructure. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Trott Bailey Family Civilization — Eight Doors
9% weight
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
What this category measures
Physical food and nutrient capacity, nourishment reach, waste/loss, public edible landscapes and free food access.
TBFC targetNutritious food should exist in multiplying abundance and remain reachable even when a household has no money to spend. Access-gate research questionCan people obtain adequate nutritious food when they cannot pay, and are free/public/productive-food routes large enough to be ordinary rather than exceptional? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Complete Reordering of Earth’s Food System
+97.3↓
Score breakdown
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Food abundance includes free edible routes and living production. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.95 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Food abundance includes free edible routes and living production. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Food abundance includes free edible routes and living production. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 14.85 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Food abundance includes free edible routes and living production. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.95 + 24.00 + 14.85 = 97.30
Base: 97.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.30 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 8.76 points
This category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +8.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +1.0
What the evidence found
Food abundance includes free edible routes and living production. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
AgriGames Foodway
6% weight
Water & Sanitation Abundance
What this category measures
Safe water, sanitation, reliability, capture, reuse, storage and living-landscape water capacity.
TBFC targetSafe water and sanitation should be dependable life infrastructure, not conditional on household purchasing power. Access-gate research questionCan households retain safe water and sanitation when income falls, and which payment, disconnection or infrastructure barriers interrupt access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
+97.3↓
Score breakdown
Water & Sanitation Abundance
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Water is designed as distributed life infrastructure. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.95 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Water is designed as distributed life infrastructure. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Water is designed as distributed life infrastructure. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 14.85 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Water is designed as distributed life infrastructure. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.95 + 24.00 + 14.85 = 97.30
Base: 97.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.30 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 5.84 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +5.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +1.0
What the evidence found
Water is designed as distributed life infrastructure. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Trott Bailey Family Civilization — Eight Doors
5% weight
Energy & Household Capability
What this category measures
Whether usable, reliable energy reaches households and removes burdens across water, food, health, cooling, cooking and movement.
TBFC targetEssential household energy should support cooking, cooling, water, food preservation and care without money becoming the switch that turns basic capability on or off. Access-gate research questionCan households retain essential energy for cooking, cooling, water and food preservation when they cannot pay, and how often does price or disconnection reduce capability? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Solar Moon Panel
+97.3↓
Score breakdown
Energy & Household Capability
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Energy capability is designed to remove household and civilization burden. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.95 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Energy capability is designed to remove household and civilization burden. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Energy capability is designed to remove household and civilization burden. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 14.85 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Energy capability is designed to remove household and civilization burden. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.95 + 24.00 + 14.85 = 97.30
Base: 97.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.30 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 4.87 points
This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +1.0
What the evidence found
Energy capability is designed to remove household and civilization burden. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Trott Bailey Solar Moon Panel
7% weight
Health & Care Reach
What this category measures
Whether prevention, primary care, medicine, maternity care, dentistry and specialist capability reach people when needed.
TBFC targetPrevention, maternity, dentistry, medicine and necessary treatment should be reachable because care is needed, not because payment can be produced. Access-gate research questionCan necessary care be obtained because it is needed, or do price, insurance, employment, debt or other financial tests materially delay or prevent access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: No Shrugging Our Shoulders at Family Suffering
+97.3↓
Score breakdown
Health & Care Reach
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Care is designed around family reach, prevention and neighborhood access. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.95 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Care is designed around family reach, prevention and neighborhood access. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Care is designed around family reach, prevention and neighborhood access. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 14.85 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Care is designed around family reach, prevention and neighborhood access. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.95 + 24.00 + 14.85 = 97.30
Base: 97.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.30 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 6.81 points
This category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +6.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +1.0
What the evidence found
Care is designed around family reach, prevention and neighborhood access. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Trott Bailey Family Civilization — Eight Doors
6% weight
Education & Human Capability
What this category measures
Foundational learning plus practical, technical and enduring civilization capability retained by people.
TBFC targetFoundational learning and useful capability should be reachable as part of civilization life rather than purchased according to family income. Access-gate research questionWhich essential learning and capability routes are genuinely reachable regardless of family income, and where do fees, debt or paid enrichment create decisive access gaps? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: What Is NoDumbDumbs?
+97.3↓
Score breakdown
Education & Human Capability
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
NoDumbDumbs develops understanding and practical human capability. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.95 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
NoDumbDumbs develops understanding and practical human capability. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
NoDumbDumbs develops understanding and practical human capability. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 14.85 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
NoDumbDumbs develops understanding and practical human capability. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.95 + 24.00 + 14.85 = 97.30
Base: 97.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.30 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 5.84 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +5.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +1.0
What the evidence found
NoDumbDumbs develops understanding and practical human capability. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
What Is NoDumbDumbs?
4% weight
Mobility & Reachability
What this category measures
Local, regional and national movement that connects people to family, services, work, learning and public life without consuming excessive time.
TBFC targetOrdinary local and regional movement should be available for family, care, learning and civic life without travel becoming a paywall. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary people reach family, care, learning and public life without high recurring fares, vehicle costs, debt or fuel dependence? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Caterport: Free Human Movement
+97.3↓
Score breakdown
Mobility & Reachability
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Caterport and LuvYou Care-Port organize free family-first movement. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.95 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Caterport and LuvYou Care-Port organize free family-first movement. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Caterport and LuvYou Care-Port organize free family-first movement. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 14.85 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Caterport and LuvYou Care-Port organize free family-first movement. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.95 + 24.00 + 14.85 = 97.30
Base: 97.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.30 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 3.89 points
This category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +1.0
What the evidence found
Caterport and LuvYou Care-Port organize free family-first movement. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
LuvYou Care-Port System Record
8% weight
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
What this category measures
Conditions that let people form stable families, raise children, multiply generations, share parental time and continue family life without punishing material barriers. New and re-reviewed profiles include total fertility as an explicit outcome signal.
TBFC targetPeople should be able to form, continue and multiply family life. Trott Bailey Family Civilization uses 5.0 children per woman as the fertility target; 2.1 is the replacement floor, not the aspiration, while housing, care, food and time should not be withheld behind financial thresholds. Access-gate research questionHow strongly do housing, childcare, health, food and work-income requirements delay or destabilize family formation and continuity, and is total fertility moving above replacement toward the 5.0-children-per-woman civilization target? Fertility methodNew and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Courtship, Marriage & Married Life
+97.3↓
Score breakdown
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Marriage and family continuity are deliberately supported. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.95 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Marriage and family continuity are deliberately supported. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Marriage and family continuity are deliberately supported. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 14.85 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Marriage and family continuity are deliberately supported. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.95 + 24.00 + 14.85 = 97.30
Base: 97.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.30 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 7.78 points
This category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +7.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion
First half — the established family and fertility assessment
The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.
Pre-policy score: +97.3
Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion
This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.
Country legal status: Pending verification
Deduction calculation: Pending; 0 points deducted provisionally, not a verified zero
Final category calculation: +97.3 − 0 = +97.3 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)
Legal status not independently reviewed for this jurisdiction; no deduction is assigned. Pending is not a confirmed absence of recognition.
Fertility and family policy: research and source notes
Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.
How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.
How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.
Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).
Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.
Abundance Gap: +1.0
What the evidence found
Marriage and family continuity are deliberately supported. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Courtship, Marriage & Married Life
5% weight
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
What this category measures
Whether land and settlement choice reach ordinary people rather than opportunity being functionally trapped inside expensive commercial centres.
TBFC targetSuitable productive land and settlement opportunity should not be functionally reserved for those able to outbid everyone else. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary families gain secure use of suitable productive ground without first accumulating enough money to purchase, finance or outbid others? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Compounds Are Civilization Circulation Systems
+97.3↓
Score breakdown
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Distributed nuclei begin with productive land and room to grow. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.95 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Distributed nuclei begin with productive land and room to grow. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Distributed nuclei begin with productive land and room to grow. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 14.85 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Distributed nuclei begin with productive land and room to grow. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.95 + 24.00 + 14.85 = 97.30
Base: 97.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.30 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 4.87 points
This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +1.0
What the evidence found
Distributed nuclei begin with productive land and room to grow. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Distributed Founding Nuclei Strategy
6% weight
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
What this category measures
Peace of mind, social support, everyday safety, public beauty, recreation, nature, culture and delight reachable without constant payment.
TBFC targetBeauty, nature, recreation, rest and public delight should belong to ordinary life rather than appearing mainly after payment. Access-gate research questionHow much everyday rest, nature, recreation, culture and public beauty is freely reachable, rather than principally accessed through paid venues, travel or private property? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
+97.3↓
Score breakdown
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Beauty, public delight and family comfort are infrastructure. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.95 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Beauty, public delight and family comfort are infrastructure. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Beauty, public delight and family comfort are infrastructure. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 14.85 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Beauty, public delight and family comfort are infrastructure. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.95 + 24.00 + 14.85 = 97.30
Base: 97.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.30 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 5.84 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +5.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +1.0
What the evidence found
Beauty, public delight and family comfort are infrastructure. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Balushu: Public Life Without Chaos
6% weight
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
What this category measures
Whether soil, forests, wetlands, habitat, pollinators, species and water-holding landscapes are strengthening rather than being consumed.
TBFC targetRegenerating soil, water, habitat and food-bearing landscapes should be maintained as shared life-supporting capacity rather than only where a transaction makes them profitable. Access-gate research questionAre regenerative land, water and habitat functions maintained as life-supporting infrastructure even when no direct commercial return is available? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
+97.3↓
Score breakdown
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Living ground is strengthened through Life upon Life field practice. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.95 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Living ground is strengthened through Life upon Life field practice. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Living ground is strengthened through Life upon Life field practice. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 14.85 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Living ground is strengthened through Life upon Life field practice. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.95 + 24.00 + 14.85 = 97.30
Base: 97.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.30 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 5.84 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +5.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +1.0
What the evidence found
Living ground is strengthened through Life upon Life field practice. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Prado Bahia Lesson about Planting on Sandy Soil
5% weight
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
What this category measures
Physical safety, usable justice, legal identity, reliable public administration and low needless institutional burden.
TBFC targetUsable justice, legal identity, safety and ordinary administration should remain accessible regardless of wealth. Access-gate research questionDo fees, legal costs, bail, fines, documentation costs or ability to hire expertise materially change access to justice, safety or public administration? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Pacorips Constitutional Foundations
+97.3↓
Score breakdown
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
The civilization authors explicit family, governance and public-life operating principles. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.95 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
The civilization authors explicit family, governance and public-life operating principles. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
The civilization authors explicit family, governance and public-life operating principles. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 14.85 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
The civilization authors explicit family, governance and public-life operating principles. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.95 + 24.00 + 14.85 = 97.30
Base: 97.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.30 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 4.87 points
This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +1.0
What the evidence found
The civilization authors explicit family, governance and public-life operating principles. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Official Trott Bailey Family Core Worldview
4% weight
Durability, Repair & Material Return
What this category measures
Whether useful materials, infrastructure and goods are maintained, repairable, recovered and cycled instead of repeatedly becoming waste.
TBFC targetRepair, maintenance and useful material circulation should protect capability instead of forcing repeated repurchase as the default route to continued use. Access-gate research questionDo repair and maintenance remain practically accessible, or do pricing, proprietary restrictions and replacement incentives turn continued use into repeated purchasing? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Repair Is Sovereignty
+97.3↓
Score breakdown
Durability, Repair & Material Return
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Repair, clean return and maintained capability are civilization functions. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.95 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Repair, clean return and maintained capability are civilization functions. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Repair, clean return and maintained capability are civilization functions. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 14.85 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Repair, clean return and maintained capability are civilization functions. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.95 + 24.00 + 14.85 = 97.30
Base: 97.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.30 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 3.89 points
Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions
A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.
No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.
This category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +1.0
What the evidence found
Repair, clean return and maintained capability are civilization functions. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
6% weight
International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
What this category measures
How easily visitors, migrants, refugees and neighbouring families can enter, remain, regularize status, prevent statelessness, build family continuity and participate in ordinary civic and economic life.
TBFC targetA country should have a humane vision for visitors, migrants, refugees and neighbouring families: practical entry, legal identity, family continuity, protection from statelessness, a route into ordinary life and a real place to contribute and grow with the society. Access-gate research questionWho can enter and stay, how wide is visa-free/eVisa/eTA reach, can newcomers regularize status and work, are refugees and children protected from statelessness, can families remain together, and does the country have a practical long-term vision for newcomers to join ordinary life and contribute? International scoring method
Welcome research checks practical entry breadth, visa-free/eVisa/eTA reach, lawful passport or citizenship pathways available to foreigners, birthright citizenship and statelessness prevention, parent/child family-status continuity, refugee recognition, migrant regularization, work/school/health access, family reunion and a credible national vision for newcomers to settle, contribute and grow with society.
A verified eVisa program open to more than 100 nationalities is recorded as a positive factual Welcome finding (the historical +5 scoring rule is retired). Researchers must verify the eligible-nationality breadth, not merely the existence of an online visa form. A lawful international citizenship/passport route available to qualifying foreigners is recorded as a Welcome access finding. The score must distinguish a usable transparent route from an expensive, narrow or highly discretionary program. Broad birthright citizenship, conditional territorial citizenship and statelessness safeguards are recorded with their precise legal eligibility and practical results. A system that leaves children without effective nationality, identity or durable status is a serious negative. A practical route that lets parents secure residence or citizenship through a child born in the country is documented for family-continuity review; long limbo, family separation or rules that strand the child between statuses reduce the score.
Refugee and migrant welcome is judged by lived access as well as admission: recognition, non-refoulement, legal documents, work, education, health care, family continuity, regularization, permanence and citizenship pathways all matter. Forced removal, refoulement, arbitrary detention, family separation and especially deporting or transferring people to unrelated third countries without a genuine durable-protection connection are negative Welcome evidence. Welcome is stronger when the country has a coherent plan for land, housing, work, contribution, family life and civic integration so newcomers are absorbed as people who can help the country grow, rather than warehoused indefinitely in camps or temporary limbo.
Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Refugee Living Should Be Glamorous, Purposeful and Liberating
+97.4↓
International score breakdown
International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Human movement is designed around care rather than payment gates. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 29.10 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Human movement is designed around care rather than payment gates. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Human movement is designed around care rather than payment gates. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 19.80 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Human movement is designed around care rather than payment gates. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 29.10 + 24.00 + 19.80 = 97.40
Base: 97.40 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.4 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.40 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 5.84 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +5.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
What the evidence found
Human movement is designed around care rather than payment gates. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
LuvYou Care-Port System Record
6% weight
External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
What this category measures
Documented effects a country, its public institutions or materially supported programs have beyond its borders: beneficial contribution, medical and technical help, mutuality, external harm, extraction, accountability and repair.
TBFC targetA civilization should increase useful local capability beyond its borders through medicine, training, disaster help, technical cooperation, peace-building and other mutually useful contribution, while avoiding extraction, exported harm and displacement. Access-gate research questionDo the country’s actions abroad increase health, skill, safety, resilience and locally retained capability, or do they export extraction, coercion, environmental harm, displacement, debt or other burdens? International scoring method
Legacy method: External Footprint documents independently verified beneficial action beyond the border, including medical missions, public-health help, scholarships, training, technical cooperation, disaster relief, humanitarian logistics, peacekeeping and other programs that leave useful capability with the receiving society. It also documents extractive conduct, exported environmental or human harm, coercive external security practices, abusive displacement outsourcing and whether documented harm is repaired, with a separately scored 6% category once four evidence-backed rails have been reviewed. Verified waste exports and disguised low-utility dumping are penalized through the transboundary harm ledger, as are irresponsible import acceptance practices through Domestic Durability & Material Return.
International contribution is investigated relative to capacity and quality, not raw size alone; documented outward activity is distinguished from independent benefit and local mutuality.
Dumping and harmful material transfers
Waste or disguised low-utility exports reduce External Footprint. Real reuse must be distinguished from disguised disposal. The sender retains responsibility for harms shifted abroad. Method v3: harmful imported garbage and low-utility dumping belong in External Footprint, where inbound transfer responsibility is 15% of the category. Historical method v2 import deductions remain archived under Domestic Durability until that country receives a sourced v3 score. Do not double-count.
Read the Trott Bailey Family work: When Another Nation Cleans Up Your Garbage
+97.2↓
International score breakdown
External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
Exact point calculation
98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Expansion is designed as distributed capability-building rather than one copied center. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Exact point calculation
97.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Expansion is designed as distributed capability-building rather than one copied center. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
96.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.60 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Expansion is designed as distributed capability-building rather than one copied center. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
99.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 14.85 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Expansion is designed as distributed capability-building rather than one copied center. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 24.50 + 24.25 + 33.60 + 14.85 = 97.20
Base: 97.20 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +97.2 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 97.20 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 5.83 points
Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions
A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.
No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +5.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
What the evidence found
Expansion is designed as distributed capability-building rather than one copied center. This is a primary authored design source for the benchmark profile, not independent empirical evidence of nationwide outcomes.
Distributed Founding Nuclei StrategyTrott Bailey Family Civilization Target
The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping
Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.
This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.
and then 
