Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

South Korea 🇰🇷

South Korea currently ranks #58 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -57.70. This country is money-gated (3.00/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Water and weakest in Welcome across 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Tracking baselineEvidence through 10 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-57.7
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: +47.1 · Money Gate: 3.00/20 · Headline: -57.7.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#58of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

South KoreaLast recorded move: down from #57 to #58.Recent recorded movements
  1. #57 → #5823 Oct 2026 · 19:04 GMT-0500
  2. #48 → #5720 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  3. #48 → #5120 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #235 → #23420 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 31: rank 60. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 9 Oct 2026 · 07:51 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 31: rank 62. 9 Oct 2026 · 07:51 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 31: rank 54. 9 Oct 2026 · 12:04 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 31: rank 69. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 31: rank 68. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 31: rank 67. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 31: rank 59. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 31: rank 59. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 31: rank 58. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 31: rank 57. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 31: rank 58. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 31: rank 59. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 31: rank 58. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 31: rank 59. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 31: rank 58. 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 31: rank 57. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 31: rank 56. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500 – 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 31: rank 55. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 31: rank 117. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 31: rank 117. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 31: rank 116. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 31: rank 240. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 31: rank 239. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 31: rank 238. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 31: rank 237. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 31: rank 236. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 31: rank 235. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 31: rank 234. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 16:49 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 31: rank 48. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 31: rank 51. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 31: rank 58. 23 Oct 2026 · 19:04 GMT-0500NOW #58Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

97%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 76.0% + 6.0 × 76.0% = 97.12% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#15

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

0.8 / 4

Food

Why 0.8 / 4?

Government education-finance reporting documents regional free-school-meal funding, and local education offices administer 2026 programmes. This does not independently establish identical nationwide entitlements. Meals are confined to school settings rather than household food access.

Point calculation

0.75 ÷ 4 × 100 = 18.75% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-09
0.5 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 0.5 / 4?

The Korea Land and Housing Corporation offers public and subsidised rental programmes, but applicants still face deposit, rent, eligibility and waiting constraints. No universal no-pay household access is established.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-09
1.3 / 4

Healthcare

Why 1.3 / 4?

National Health Insurance delivers broad care access but premiums and patient copayments remain required. Partial exemptions do not amount to comprehensive pay-free care.

Point calculation

1.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 31.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-09
0.3 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.3 / 4?

Ordinary Seoul public transport charges fares; concession or targeted passes do not remove regular payment nationally.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-09
0.3 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 0.3 / 4?

KEPCO publishes household electricity tariffs and payment obligations. Targeted utility assistance is narrower than unconditional national water-and-energy access.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-09
Money Gate score
  • Food0.8 / 4
  • Housing / Land0.5 / 4
  • Healthcare1.3 / 4
  • Transportation0.3 / 4
  • Water / Energy0.3 / 4
  • Money still needed17.0 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 3.0 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 0.75 + Housing / Land 0.50 + Healthcare 1.25 + Transportation 0.25 + Water / Energy 0.25 = 3.00 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
71.2 / 100
Why 71.2 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -42.44) ÷ 2 = 71.22 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-42.5
Why -42.5?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 3.00 = -42.5

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-59.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence +42.8

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-59.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-46.8× 25%= -11.7 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -46.8 × 25% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For South Korea, ministry of Employment and Labor statistics show average monthly hours worked fell to 153.8 in 2025, while the statutory framework still permits up to 52 hours in a week. Korea has materially reduced work time, but long-hours culture, labour-market dualism and work-family pressure remain meaningful frictions.

For South Korea, ministry of Employment and Labor statistics show average monthly hours worked fell to 153.8 in 2025, while the statutory framework still permits up to 52 hours in a week. Korea has materially reduced work time, but long-hours culture, labour-market dualism and work-family pressure remain meaningful frictions.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-51.1× 35%= -17.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -51.1 × 35% = -17.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, ministry of Employment and Labor statistics show average monthly hours worked fell to 153.8 in 2025, while the statutory framework still permits up to 52 hours in a week. Korea has materially reduced work time, but long-hours culture, labour-market dualism and work-family pressure remain meaningful frictions.

For South Korea, ministry of Employment and Labor statistics show average monthly hours worked fell to 153.8 in 2025, while the statutory framework still permits up to 52 hours in a week. Korea has materially reduced work time, but long-hours culture, labour-market dualism and work-family pressure remain meaningful frictions.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-84.2× 25%= -21.1 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -84.2 × 25% = -21.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For South Korea, the 2024 Time Use Survey reports that in dual-income households with children younger than 18, husbands averaged 1 hour 24 minutes daily on housework and wives 3 hours 32 minutes. It reports the comparison with 2019 as +13 and -17 minutes, respectively.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-55.4× 15%= -8.3 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -55.4 × 15% = -8.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, ministry of Employment and Labor statistics show average monthly hours worked fell to 153.8 in 2025, while the statutory framework still permits up to 52 hours in a week. Korea has materially reduced work time, but long-hours culture, labour-market dualism and work-family pressure remain meaningful frictions.

For South Korea, ministry of Employment and Labor statistics show average monthly hours worked fell to 153.8 in 2025, while the statutory framework still permits up to 52 hours in a week. Korea has materially reduced work time, but long-hours culture, labour-market dualism and work-family pressure remain meaningful frictions.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.70 + -17.89 + -21.05 + -8.32 = -59.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +42.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +42.8. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -59.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+42.8 Original evidence category score+42.8 Contribution to national evidence score+4.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 24.50 + -11.25 + 8.25 = 42.75

Base: 42.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +42.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 42.75 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 3.96 points

For South Korea, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — human-time-burden domestic evidence retained

For South Korea, ministry of Employment and Labor statistics show average monthly hours worked fell to 153.8 in 2025, while the statutory framework still permits up to 52 hours in a week. Korea has materially reduced work time, but long-hours culture, labour-market dualism and work-family pressure remain meaningful frictions.

2026-10-11 Ministry of Employment and Labor — Labor Statistics / Hours Worked · OECD Economic Surveys: Korea 2026
2026-10-21 second-batch source check - KOR - 2024 Time Use Survey: household work in two-earner families

For South Korea, the 2024 Time Use Survey reports that in dual-income households with children younger than 18, husbands averaged 1 hour 24 minutes daily on housework and wives 3 hours 32 minutes. It reports the comparison with 2019 as +13 and -17 minutes, respectively.

2025-07-28 Korea Ministry of Data and Statistics
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-58.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +43.5

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-58.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-45.4× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -45.4 × 25% = -11.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For South Korea, the 2024 Korea Housing Survey reports 61.4% homeownership, 58.4% owner occupation, a national median price-to-income ratio of 6.3, rent-to-income ratio of 15.8%, and 3.8% of households below the minimum housing standard. Capacity is high, but capital-region affordability and concentration remain substantial barriers.

For South Korea, the 2024 Korea Housing Survey reports 61.4% homeownership, 58.4% owner occupation, a national median price-to-income ratio of 6.3, rent-to-income ratio of 15.8%, and 3.8% of households below the minimum housing standard. Capacity is high, but capital-region affordability and concentration remain substantial barriers.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-51.1× 35%= -17.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -51.1 × 35% = -17.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, the 2024 Korea Housing Survey reports 61.4% homeownership, 58.4% owner occupation, a national median price-to-income ratio of 6.3, rent-to-income ratio of 15.8%, and 3.8% of households below the minimum housing standard. Capacity is high, but capital-region affordability and concentration remain substantial barriers.

For South Korea, the 2024 Korea Housing Survey reports 61.4% homeownership, 58.4% owner occupation, a national median price-to-income ratio of 6.3, rent-to-income ratio of 15.8%, and 3.8% of households below the minimum housing standard. Capacity is high, but capital-region affordability and concentration remain substantial barriers.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.6× 25%= -21.4 points
Exact point calculation

-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points

Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.0; Money-gated reading -85.6 × 25% = -21.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, the 2024 Korea Housing Survey reports 61.4% homeownership, 58.4% owner occupation, a national median price-to-income ratio of 6.3, rent-to-income ratio of 15.8%, and 3.8% of households below the minimum housing standard. Capacity is high, but capital-region affordability and concentration remain substantial barriers.

For South Korea, the 2024 Korea Housing Survey reports 61.4% homeownership, 58.4% owner occupation, a national median price-to-income ratio of 6.3, rent-to-income ratio of 15.8%, and 3.8% of households below the minimum housing standard. Capacity is high, but capital-region affordability and concentration remain substantial barriers.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-54.0× 15%= -8.1 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -54.0 × 15% = -8.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, the 2024 Korea Housing Survey reports 61.4% homeownership, 58.4% owner occupation, a national median price-to-income ratio of 6.3, rent-to-income ratio of 15.8%, and 3.8% of households below the minimum housing standard. Capacity is high, but capital-region affordability and concentration remain substantial barriers.

For South Korea, the 2024 Korea Housing Survey reports 61.4% homeownership, 58.4% owner occupation, a national median price-to-income ratio of 6.3, rent-to-income ratio of 15.8%, and 3.8% of households below the minimum housing standard. Capacity is high, but capital-region affordability and concentration remain substantial barriers.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.34 + -17.89 + -21.41 + -8.10 = -58.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +43.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +43.5. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+43.5 Original evidence category score+43.5 Contribution to national evidence score+3.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 24.50 + -12.50 + 9.00 = 43.50

Base: 43.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +43.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 43.50 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 3.58 points

For South Korea, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — housing-shelter-reach domestic evidence retained

For South Korea, the 2024 Korea Housing Survey reports 61.4% homeownership, 58.4% owner occupation, a national median price-to-income ratio of 6.3, rent-to-income ratio of 15.8%, and 3.8% of households below the minimum housing standard. Capacity is high, but capital-region affordability and concentration remain substantial barriers.

2026-10-11 MOLIT — 2024 Korea Housing Survey · OECD Economic Surveys: Korea 2026
South Korea — Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

For South Korea, the 2024 Korea Housing Survey reports 61.4% homeownership, 58.4% owner occupation, a national median price-to-income ratio of 6.3, rent-to-income ratio of 15.8%, and 3.8% of households below the minimum housing standard. Capacity is high, but capital-region affordability and concentration remain substantial barriers.

2025-11-16 MOLIT — 2024 Korea Housing Survey · OECD Economic Surveys: Korea 2026
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-56.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +52.3

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-56.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-45.4× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -45.4 × 25% = -11.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For South Korea, korea has dense national food distribution and high household food availability, but the Ministry of Agriculture reported national food self-sufficiency at 47.9% in 2024. The score therefore credits physical and distribution capacity while applying friction for dependence on imported food and feed chains and the absence of national-scale free-food access.

For South Korea, korea has dense national food distribution and high household food availability, but the Ministry of Agriculture reported national food self-sufficiency at 47.9% in 2024. The score therefore credits physical and distribution capacity while applying friction for dependence on imported food and feed chains and the absence of national-scale free-food access.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-46.0× 35%= -16.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.75/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

88.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 30.80 weighted points

Original evidence +88.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +88.0; Money-gated reading -46.0 × 35% = -16.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea has dense national food distribution and high household food availability, but the Ministry of Agriculture reported national food self-sufficiency at 47.9% in 2024. The score therefore credits physical and distribution capacity while applying friction for dependence on imported food and feed chains and the absence of national-scale free-food access.

For South Korea, korea has dense national food distribution and high household food availability, but the Ministry of Agriculture reported national food self-sufficiency at 47.9% in 2024. The score therefore credits physical and distribution capacity while applying friction for dependence on imported food and feed chains and the absence of national-scale free-food access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.8× 25%= -20.7 points
Exact point calculation

-40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.00 weighted points

Original evidence -40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -40.0; Money-gated reading -82.8 × 25% = -20.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea has dense national food distribution and high household food availability, but the Ministry of Agriculture reported national food self-sufficiency at 47.9% in 2024. The score therefore credits physical and distribution capacity while applying friction for dependence on imported food and feed chains and the absence of national-scale free-food access.

For South Korea, korea has dense national food distribution and high household food availability, but the Ministry of Agriculture reported national food self-sufficiency at 47.9% in 2024. The score therefore credits physical and distribution capacity while applying friction for dependence on imported food and feed chains and the absence of national-scale free-food access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-54.0× 15%= -8.1 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -54.0 × 15% = -8.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea has dense national food distribution and high household food availability, but the Ministry of Agriculture reported national food self-sufficiency at 47.9% in 2024. The score therefore credits physical and distribution capacity while applying friction for dependence on imported food and feed chains and the absence of national-scale free-food access.

For South Korea, korea has dense national food distribution and high household food availability, but the Ministry of Agriculture reported national food self-sufficiency at 47.9% in 2024. The score therefore credits physical and distribution capacity while applying friction for dependence on imported food and feed chains and the absence of national-scale free-food access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.34 + -16.08 + -20.69 + -8.10 = -56.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +52.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +52.3. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -56.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+52.3 Original evidence category score+52.3 Contribution to national evidence score+4.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 30.80 + -10.00 + 9.00 = 52.30

Base: 52.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +52.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 52.30 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 4.85 points

For South Korea, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +2.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — food-nourishment-free-food domestic evidence retained

For South Korea, korea has dense national food distribution and high household food availability, but the Ministry of Agriculture reported national food self-sufficiency at 47.9% in 2024. The score therefore credits physical and distribution capacity while applying friction for dependence on imported food and feed chains and the absence of national-scale free-food access.

2026-10-11 MAFRA — Food Security Task Force / 2024 Food Self-Sufficiency · OECD Economic Surveys: Korea 2026
South Korea — Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

For South Korea, korea has dense national food distribution and high household food availability, but the Ministry of Agriculture reported national food self-sufficiency at 47.9% in 2024. The score therefore credits physical and distribution capacity while applying friction for dependence on imported food and feed chains and the absence of national-scale free-food access.

2026-07-20 MAFRA — Food Security Task Force / 2024 Food Self-Sufficiency · OECD Economic Surveys: Korea 2026
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-52.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +66.0

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-52.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-43.1× 25%= -10.8 points
Exact point calculation

98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points

Original evidence +98.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +98.0; Money-gated reading -43.1 × 25% = -10.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For South Korea, national sewerage coverage reached 95.6% in 2024. Of 7.48 billion tonnes of treated sewage water, 1.17 billion tonnes were reused, while the Ministry of Environment is expanding reclaimed-water, drought and alternative-water infrastructure. Reach is near-universal and reuse capacity is real, though not yet dominant.

For South Korea, national sewerage coverage reached 95.6% in 2024. Of 7.48 billion tonnes of treated sewage water, 1.17 billion tonnes were reused, while the Ministry of Environment is expanding reclaimed-water, drought and alternative-water infrastructure. Reach is near-universal and reuse capacity is real, though not yet dominant.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-43.4× 35%= -15.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

97.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.95 weighted points

Original evidence +97.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +97.0; Money-gated reading -43.4 × 35% = -15.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, national sewerage coverage reached 95.6% in 2024. Of 7.48 billion tonnes of treated sewage water, 1.17 billion tonnes were reused, while the Ministry of Environment is expanding reclaimed-water, drought and alternative-water infrastructure. Reach is near-universal and reuse capacity is real, though not yet dominant.

For South Korea, national sewerage coverage reached 95.6% in 2024. Of 7.48 billion tonnes of treated sewage water, 1.17 billion tonnes were reused, while the Ministry of Environment is expanding reclaimed-water, drought and alternative-water infrastructure. Reach is near-universal and reuse capacity is real, though not yet dominant.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-75.6× 25%= -18.9 points
Exact point calculation

-15.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -3.75 weighted points

Original evidence -15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -15.0; Money-gated reading -75.6 × 25% = -18.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, national sewerage coverage reached 95.6% in 2024. Of 7.48 billion tonnes of treated sewage water, 1.17 billion tonnes were reused, while the Ministry of Environment is expanding reclaimed-water, drought and alternative-water infrastructure. Reach is near-universal and reuse capacity is real, though not yet dominant.

For South Korea, national sewerage coverage reached 95.6% in 2024. Of 7.48 billion tonnes of treated sewage water, 1.17 billion tonnes were reused, while the Ministry of Environment is expanding reclaimed-water, drought and alternative-water infrastructure. Reach is near-universal and reuse capacity is real, though not yet dominant.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.7× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, national sewerage coverage reached 95.6% in 2024. Of 7.48 billion tonnes of treated sewage water, 1.17 billion tonnes were reused, while the Ministry of Environment is expanding reclaimed-water, drought and alternative-water infrastructure. Reach is near-universal and reuse capacity is real, though not yet dominant.

For South Korea, national sewerage coverage reached 95.6% in 2024. Of 7.48 billion tonnes of treated sewage water, 1.17 billion tonnes were reused, while the Ministry of Environment is expanding reclaimed-water, drought and alternative-water infrastructure. Reach is near-universal and reuse capacity is real, though not yet dominant.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.77 + -15.18 + -18.89 + -7.45 = -52.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +66.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +66.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -52.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+66.0 Original evidence category score+66.0 Contribution to national evidence score+4.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.95 + -3.75 + 11.25 = 65.95

Base: 65.95 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +66.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 65.95 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 4.07 points

For South Korea, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +1.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — water-sanitation domestic evidence retained

For South Korea, national sewerage coverage reached 95.6% in 2024. Of 7.48 billion tonnes of treated sewage water, 1.17 billion tonnes were reused, while the Ministry of Environment is expanding reclaimed-water, drought and alternative-water infrastructure. Reach is near-universal and reuse capacity is real, though not yet dominant.

2026-10-11 Ministry of Environment — 2024 Sewerage Statistics · Ministry of Environment — 2025 Water Reuse and Alternative Water Plan
South Korea — Water & Sanitation Abundance

For South Korea, national sewerage coverage reached 95.6% in 2024. Of 7.48 billion tonnes of treated sewage water, 1.17 billion tonnes were reused, while the Ministry of Environment is expanding reclaimed-water, drought and alternative-water infrastructure. Reach is near-universal and reuse capacity is real, though not yet dominant.

2025-09-01 Ministry of Environment — 2024 Sewerage Statistics · Ministry of Environment — 2025 Water Reuse and Alternative Water Plan
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-54.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +57.6

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-54.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-43.1× 25%= -10.8 points
Exact point calculation

98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points

Original evidence +98.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +98.0; Money-gated reading -43.1 × 25% = -10.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For South Korea, electricity access and system capability are effectively universal and technically strong, including large nuclear capacity. Yet the IEA reports that Korea remains heavily dependent on imported energy and has the lowest renewable share in electricity supply among IEA countries, leaving household capability exposed to global fuel and price chains.

For South Korea, electricity access and system capability are effectively universal and technically strong, including large nuclear capacity. Yet the IEA reports that Korea remains heavily dependent on imported energy and has the lowest renewable share in electricity supply among IEA countries, leaving household capability exposed to global fuel and price chains.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-43.1× 35%= -15.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

98.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 34.30 weighted points

Original evidence +98.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +98.0; Money-gated reading -43.1 × 35% = -15.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, electricity access and system capability are effectively universal and technically strong, including large nuclear capacity. Yet the IEA reports that Korea remains heavily dependent on imported energy and has the lowest renewable share in electricity supply among IEA countries, leaving household capability exposed to global fuel and price chains.

For South Korea, electricity access and system capability are effectively universal and technically strong, including large nuclear capacity. Yet the IEA reports that Korea remains heavily dependent on imported energy and has the lowest renewable share in electricity supply among IEA countries, leaving household capability exposed to global fuel and price chains.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.3× 25%= -20.3 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -81.3 × 25% = -20.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, electricity access and system capability are effectively universal and technically strong, including large nuclear capacity. Yet the IEA reports that Korea remains heavily dependent on imported energy and has the lowest renewable share in electricity supply among IEA countries, leaving household capability exposed to global fuel and price chains.

For South Korea, electricity access and system capability are effectively universal and technically strong, including large nuclear capacity. Yet the IEA reports that Korea remains heavily dependent on imported energy and has the lowest renewable share in electricity supply among IEA countries, leaving household capability exposed to global fuel and price chains.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-56.9× 15%= -8.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -56.9 × 15% = -8.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, electricity access and system capability are effectively universal and technically strong, including large nuclear capacity. Yet the IEA reports that Korea remains heavily dependent on imported energy and has the lowest renewable share in electricity supply among IEA countries, leaving household capability exposed to global fuel and price chains.

For South Korea, electricity access and system capability are effectively universal and technically strong, including large nuclear capacity. Yet the IEA reports that Korea remains heavily dependent on imported energy and has the lowest renewable share in electricity supply among IEA countries, leaving household capability exposed to global fuel and price chains.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.77 + -15.08 + -20.33 + -8.52 = -54.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +57.6. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +57.6. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -54.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+57.6 Original evidence category score+57.6 Contribution to national evidence score+3.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 24.50 + 34.30 + -8.75 + 7.50 = 57.55

Base: 57.55 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +57.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 57.55 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.96 points

For South Korea, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: 0.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — energy-household-capability domestic evidence retained

For South Korea, electricity access and system capability are effectively universal and technically strong, including large nuclear capacity. Yet the IEA reports that Korea remains heavily dependent on imported energy and has the lowest renewable share in electricity supply among IEA countries, leaving household capability exposed to global fuel and price chains.

2026-10-11 IEA — Korea 2025 Executive Summary · Korea Energy Economics Institute — Korea Energy Statistical Information System
South Korea — Energy & Household Capability

For South Korea, electricity access and system capability are effectively universal and technically strong, including large nuclear capacity. Yet the IEA reports that Korea remains heavily dependent on imported energy and has the lowest renewable share in electricity supply among IEA countries, leaving household capability exposed to global fuel and price chains.

2025-12-01 IEA — Korea 2025 Executive Summary · Korea Energy Economics Institute — Korea Energy Statistical Information System
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-53.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +60.3

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-53.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-43.1× 25%= -10.8 points
Exact point calculation

98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points

Original evidence +98.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +98.0; Money-gated reading -43.1 × 25% = -10.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For South Korea, national Health Insurance covers the population for a core set of services, with Medical Aid serving roughly 3% of residents. OECD Health at a Glance 2025 reports universal core coverage and strong outcomes, but only 60% of spending is covered by mandatory prepayment and Korea has 2.7 practising doctors per 1,000 people versus 3.9 across the OECD.

For South Korea, national Health Insurance covers the population for a core set of services, with Medical Aid serving roughly 3% of residents. OECD Health at a Glance 2025 reports universal core coverage and strong outcomes, but only 60% of spending is covered by mandatory prepayment and Korea has 2.7 practising doctors per 1,000 people versus 3.9 across the OECD.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-43.9× 35%= -15.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 1.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

95.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.25 weighted points

Original evidence +95.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +95.0; Money-gated reading -43.9 × 35% = -15.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, national Health Insurance covers the population for a core set of services, with Medical Aid serving roughly 3% of residents. OECD Health at a Glance 2025 reports universal core coverage and strong outcomes, but only 60% of spending is covered by mandatory prepayment and Korea has 2.7 practising doctors per 1,000 people versus 3.9 across the OECD.

For South Korea, national Health Insurance covers the population for a core set of services, with Medical Aid serving roughly 3% of residents. OECD Health at a Glance 2025 reports universal core coverage and strong outcomes, but only 60% of spending is covered by mandatory prepayment and Korea has 2.7 practising doctors per 1,000 people versus 3.9 across the OECD.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.3× 25%= -20.3 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -81.3 × 25% = -20.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, national Health Insurance covers the population for a core set of services, with Medical Aid serving roughly 3% of residents. OECD Health at a Glance 2025 reports universal core coverage and strong outcomes, but only 60% of spending is covered by mandatory prepayment and Korea has 2.7 practising doctors per 1,000 people versus 3.9 across the OECD.

For South Korea, national Health Insurance covers the population for a core set of services, with Medical Aid serving roughly 3% of residents. OECD Health at a Glance 2025 reports universal core coverage and strong outcomes, but only 60% of spending is covered by mandatory prepayment and Korea has 2.7 practising doctors per 1,000 people versus 3.9 across the OECD.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.7× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, national Health Insurance covers the population for a core set of services, with Medical Aid serving roughly 3% of residents. OECD Health at a Glance 2025 reports universal core coverage and strong outcomes, but only 60% of spending is covered by mandatory prepayment and Korea has 2.7 practising doctors per 1,000 people versus 3.9 across the OECD.

For South Korea, national Health Insurance covers the population for a core set of services, with Medical Aid serving roughly 3% of residents. OECD Health at a Glance 2025 reports universal core coverage and strong outcomes, but only 60% of spending is covered by mandatory prepayment and Korea has 2.7 practising doctors per 1,000 people versus 3.9 across the OECD.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.77 + -15.38 + -20.33 + -7.45 = -53.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +60.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +60.3. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -53.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+60.3 Original evidence category score+60.3 Contribution to national evidence score+4.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.25 + -8.75 + 11.25 = 60.25

Base: 60.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +60.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 60.25 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 4.34 points

For South Korea, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +3.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — health-care-reach domestic evidence retained

For South Korea, national Health Insurance covers the population for a core set of services, with Medical Aid serving roughly 3% of residents. OECD Health at a Glance 2025 reports universal core coverage and strong outcomes, but only 60% of spending is covered by mandatory prepayment and Korea has 2.7 practising doctors per 1,000 people versus 3.9 across the OECD.

2026-10-11 OECD Health at a Glance 2025 — Korea · National Health Insurance Service — Population Coverage
South Korea — Health & Care Reach

For South Korea, national Health Insurance covers the population for a core set of services, with Medical Aid serving roughly 3% of residents. OECD Health at a Glance 2025 reports universal core coverage and strong outcomes, but only 60% of spending is covered by mandatory prepayment and Korea has 2.7 practising doctors per 1,000 people versus 3.9 across the OECD.

2025-11-13 OECD Health at a Glance 2025 — Korea · National Health Insurance Service — Population Coverage
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-54.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +57.8

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-54.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-43.1× 25%= -10.8 points
Exact point calculation

98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points

Original evidence +98.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +98.0; Money-gated reading -43.1 × 25% = -10.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For South Korea, korea retains very high school and tertiary capacity, but private tutoring remains a major household burden: the Ministry of Education reports 27.5 trillion won in private education spending in 2025. OECD 2026 also finds adult skills below the OECD average despite heavy education investment, so formal reach is excellent while lifelong capability and household friction remain weaker.

For South Korea, korea retains very high school and tertiary capacity, but private tutoring remains a major household burden: the Ministry of Education reports 27.5 trillion won in private education spending in 2025. OECD 2026 also finds adult skills below the OECD average despite heavy education investment, so formal reach is excellent while lifelong capability and household friction remain weaker.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-43.9× 35%= -15.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

95.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 33.25 weighted points

Original evidence +95.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +95.0; Money-gated reading -43.9 × 35% = -15.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea retains very high school and tertiary capacity, but private tutoring remains a major household burden: the Ministry of Education reports 27.5 trillion won in private education spending in 2025. OECD 2026 also finds adult skills below the OECD average despite heavy education investment, so formal reach is excellent while lifelong capability and household friction remain weaker.

For South Korea, korea retains very high school and tertiary capacity, but private tutoring remains a major household burden: the Ministry of Education reports 27.5 trillion won in private education spending in 2025. OECD 2026 also finds adult skills below the OECD average despite heavy education investment, so formal reach is excellent while lifelong capability and household friction remain weaker.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-84.2× 25%= -21.1 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -84.2 × 25% = -21.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea retains very high school and tertiary capacity, but private tutoring remains a major household burden: the Ministry of Education reports 27.5 trillion won in private education spending in 2025. OECD 2026 also finds adult skills below the OECD average despite heavy education investment, so formal reach is excellent while lifelong capability and household friction remain weaker.

For South Korea, korea retains very high school and tertiary capacity, but private tutoring remains a major household burden: the Ministry of Education reports 27.5 trillion won in private education spending in 2025. OECD 2026 also finds adult skills below the OECD average despite heavy education investment, so formal reach is excellent while lifelong capability and household friction remain weaker.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-49.7× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea retains very high school and tertiary capacity, but private tutoring remains a major household burden: the Ministry of Education reports 27.5 trillion won in private education spending in 2025. OECD 2026 also finds adult skills below the OECD average despite heavy education investment, so formal reach is excellent while lifelong capability and household friction remain weaker.

For South Korea, korea retains very high school and tertiary capacity, but private tutoring remains a major household burden: the Ministry of Education reports 27.5 trillion won in private education spending in 2025. OECD 2026 also finds adult skills below the OECD average despite heavy education investment, so formal reach is excellent while lifelong capability and household friction remain weaker.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.77 + -15.38 + -21.05 + -7.45 = -54.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +57.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +57.8. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -54.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+57.8 Original evidence category score+57.8 Contribution to national evidence score+3.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 24.50 + 33.25 + -11.25 + 11.25 = 57.75

Base: 57.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +57.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 57.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 3.57 points

For South Korea, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +3.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — education-human-capability domestic evidence retained

For South Korea, korea retains very high school and tertiary capacity, but private tutoring remains a major household burden: the Ministry of Education reports 27.5 trillion won in private education spending in 2025. OECD 2026 also finds adult skills below the OECD average despite heavy education investment, so formal reach is excellent while lifelong capability and household friction remain weaker.

2026-10-11 Ministry of Education — 2025 Private Education Expenditure Survey · OECD Education at a Glance 2026 — Korea
South Korea — Education & Human Capability

For South Korea, korea retains very high school and tertiary capacity, but private tutoring remains a major household burden: the Ministry of Education reports 27.5 trillion won in private education spending in 2025. OECD 2026 also finds adult skills below the OECD average despite heavy education investment, so formal reach is excellent while lifelong capability and household friction remain weaker.

2026-03-12 Ministry of Education — 2025 Private Education Expenditure Survey · OECD Education at a Glance 2026 — Korea
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-54.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +59.1

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-54.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-43.1× 25%= -10.8 points
Exact point calculation

98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points

Original evidence +98.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +98.0; Money-gated reading -43.1 × 25% = -10.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For South Korea, korea has dense metropolitan transit and a mature national rail system. MOLIT reports 172.22 million arterial-rail passengers in 2025, including about 119 million high-speed-rail passengers. Reach is strong, but congestion, car dependence outside the strongest transit corridors and regional imbalance still consume time.

For South Korea, korea has dense metropolitan transit and a mature national rail system. MOLIT reports 172.22 million arterial-rail passengers in 2025, including about 119 million high-speed-rail passengers. Reach is strong, but congestion, car dependence outside the strongest transit corridors and regional imbalance still consume time.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-46.0× 35%= -16.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

88.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 30.80 weighted points

Original evidence +88.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +88.0; Money-gated reading -46.0 × 35% = -16.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea has dense metropolitan transit and a mature national rail system. MOLIT reports 172.22 million arterial-rail passengers in 2025, including about 119 million high-speed-rail passengers. Reach is strong, but congestion, car dependence outside the strongest transit corridors and regional imbalance still consume time.

For South Korea, korea has dense metropolitan transit and a mature national rail system. MOLIT reports 172.22 million arterial-rail passengers in 2025, including about 119 million high-speed-rail passengers. Reach is strong, but congestion, car dependence outside the strongest transit corridors and regional imbalance still consume time.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-79.9× 25%= -20.0 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.0; Money-gated reading -79.9 × 25% = -20.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea has dense metropolitan transit and a mature national rail system. MOLIT reports 172.22 million arterial-rail passengers in 2025, including about 119 million high-speed-rail passengers. Reach is strong, but congestion, car dependence outside the strongest transit corridors and regional imbalance still consume time.

For South Korea, korea has dense metropolitan transit and a mature national rail system. MOLIT reports 172.22 million arterial-rail passengers in 2025, including about 119 million high-speed-rail passengers. Reach is strong, but congestion, car dependence outside the strongest transit corridors and regional imbalance still consume time.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-49.7× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea has dense metropolitan transit and a mature national rail system. MOLIT reports 172.22 million arterial-rail passengers in 2025, including about 119 million high-speed-rail passengers. Reach is strong, but congestion, car dependence outside the strongest transit corridors and regional imbalance still consume time.

For South Korea, korea has dense metropolitan transit and a mature national rail system. MOLIT reports 172.22 million arterial-rail passengers in 2025, including about 119 million high-speed-rail passengers. Reach is strong, but congestion, car dependence outside the strongest transit corridors and regional imbalance still consume time.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.77 + -16.08 + -19.97 + -7.45 = -54.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +59.1. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +59.1. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -54.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+59.1 Original evidence category score+59.1 Contribution to national evidence score+2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 24.50 + 30.80 + -7.50 + 11.25 = 59.05

Base: 59.05 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +59.1 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 59.05 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.43 points

For South Korea, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — mobility-reachability domestic evidence retained

For South Korea, korea has dense metropolitan transit and a mature national rail system. MOLIT reports 172.22 million arterial-rail passengers in 2025, including about 119 million high-speed-rail passengers. Reach is strong, but congestion, car dependence outside the strongest transit corridors and regional imbalance still consume time.

2026-10-11 MOLIT — 2025 Railway Passenger Record · OECD Economic Surveys: Korea 2026
South Korea — Mobility & Reachability

For South Korea, korea has dense metropolitan transit and a mature national rail system. MOLIT reports 172.22 million arterial-rail passengers in 2025, including about 119 million high-speed-rail passengers. Reach is strong, but congestion, car dependence outside the strongest transit corridors and regional imbalance still consume time.

2026-01-14 MOLIT — 2025 Railway Passenger Record · OECD Economic Surveys: Korea 2026
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-61.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +34.5

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-61.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-45.4× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -45.4 × 25% = -11.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For South Korea, final 2025 birth statistics show the total fertility rate rose to 0.80 and births increased to about 254,300, a welcome second-year rebound. The level remains exceptionally low, and OECD analysis continues to identify housing costs, private education expense, long work hours and motherhood career penalties as barriers to forming and sustaining families.

For South Korea, final 2025 birth statistics show the total fertility rate rose to 0.80 and births increased to about 254,300, a welcome second-year rebound. The level remains exceptionally low, and OECD analysis continues to identify housing costs, private education expense, long work hours and motherhood career penalties as barriers to forming and sustaining families.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-52.6× 35%= -18.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -52.6 × 35% = -18.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, final 2025 birth statistics show the total fertility rate rose to 0.80 and births increased to about 254,300, a welcome second-year rebound. The level remains exceptionally low, and OECD analysis continues to identify housing costs, private education expense, long work hours and motherhood career penalties as barriers to forming and sustaining families.

For South Korea, final 2025 birth statistics show the total fertility rate rose to 0.80 and births increased to about 254,300, a welcome second-year rebound. The level remains exceptionally low, and OECD analysis continues to identify housing costs, private education expense, long work hours and motherhood career penalties as barriers to forming and sustaining families.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-91.4× 25%= -22.8 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Original evidence -70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -91.4 × 25% = -22.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, final 2025 birth statistics show the total fertility rate rose to 0.80 and births increased to about 254,300, a welcome second-year rebound. The level remains exceptionally low, and OECD analysis continues to identify housing costs, private education expense, long work hours and motherhood career penalties as barriers to forming and sustaining families.

For South Korea, final 2025 birth statistics show the total fertility rate rose to 0.80 and births increased to about 254,300, a welcome second-year rebound. The level remains exceptionally low, and OECD analysis continues to identify housing costs, private education expense, long work hours and motherhood career penalties as barriers to forming and sustaining families.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-58.3× 15%= -8.8 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 15% = -8.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, final 2025 birth statistics show the total fertility rate rose to 0.80 and births increased to about 254,300, a welcome second-year rebound. The level remains exceptionally low, and OECD analysis continues to identify housing costs, private education expense, long work hours and motherhood career penalties as barriers to forming and sustaining families.

For South Korea, final 2025 birth statistics show the total fertility rate rose to 0.80 and births increased to about 254,300, a welcome second-year rebound. The level remains exceptionally low, and OECD analysis continues to identify housing costs, private education expense, long work hours and motherhood career penalties as barriers to forming and sustaining families.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.34 + -18.40 + -22.84 + -8.75 = -61.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +34.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +34.5. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -61.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+34.5 Original evidence category score+34.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 22.75 + -17.50 + 6.75 = 34.50

Base: 34.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +34.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 34.50 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.84 points

For South Korea, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +34.5

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: +34.5 − 0 = +34.5 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

South Korea: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded in the cited legal-status review as of 2026-10-09. Health-insurance dependent coverage has been recognised for a same-sex partner, but that does not establish nationwide civil marriage. This is a legal-classification reading only; it does not prove demographic causation.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2026-10-09 (access date) · Reviewed: 2026-10-09

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — family-formation-stability domestic evidence retained

For South Korea, final 2025 birth statistics show the total fertility rate rose to 0.80 and births increased to about 254,300, a welcome second-year rebound. The level remains exceptionally low, and OECD analysis continues to identify housing costs, private education expense, long work hours and motherhood career penalties as barriers to forming and sustaining families.

2026-10-11 Ministry of Data and Statistics — 2025 Birth Statistics · OECD — Korea's Unborn Future
South Korea — Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

For South Korea, final 2025 birth statistics show the total fertility rate rose to 0.80 and births increased to about 254,300, a welcome second-year rebound. The level remains exceptionally low, and OECD analysis continues to identify housing costs, private education expense, long work hours and motherhood career penalties as barriers to forming and sustaining families.

2026-08-26 Ministry of Data and Statistics — 2025 Birth Statistics · OECD — Korea's Unborn Future
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-64.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +25.0

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-64.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-49.7× 25%= -12.4 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 25% = -12.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For South Korea, korea has strong infrastructure across a compact national territory, but opportunity and young population remain concentrated around Seoul and major urban centres. OECD 2026 identifies regional decline, housing constraints and weakening local economies as mutually reinforcing, limiting ordinary spatial choice despite large national productive capacity.

For South Korea, korea has strong infrastructure across a compact national territory, but opportunity and young population remain concentrated around Seoul and major urban centres. OECD 2026 identifies regional decline, housing constraints and weakening local economies as mutually reinforcing, limiting ordinary spatial choice despite large national productive capacity.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-58.3× 35%= -20.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea has strong infrastructure across a compact national territory, but opportunity and young population remain concentrated around Seoul and major urban centres. OECD 2026 identifies regional decline, housing constraints and weakening local economies as mutually reinforcing, limiting ordinary spatial choice despite large national productive capacity.

For South Korea, korea has strong infrastructure across a compact national territory, but opportunity and young population remain concentrated around Seoul and major urban centres. OECD 2026 identifies regional decline, housing constraints and weakening local economies as mutually reinforcing, limiting ordinary spatial choice despite large national productive capacity.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-89.9× 25%= -22.5 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -89.9 × 25% = -22.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea has strong infrastructure across a compact national territory, but opportunity and young population remain concentrated around Seoul and major urban centres. OECD 2026 identifies regional decline, housing constraints and weakening local economies as mutually reinforcing, limiting ordinary spatial choice despite large national productive capacity.

For South Korea, korea has strong infrastructure across a compact national territory, but opportunity and young population remain concentrated around Seoul and major urban centres. OECD 2026 identifies regional decline, housing constraints and weakening local economies as mutually reinforcing, limiting ordinary spatial choice despite large national productive capacity.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-58.3× 15%= -8.8 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 15% = -8.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea has strong infrastructure across a compact national territory, but opportunity and young population remain concentrated around Seoul and major urban centres. OECD 2026 identifies regional decline, housing constraints and weakening local economies as mutually reinforcing, limiting ordinary spatial choice despite large national productive capacity.

For South Korea, korea has strong infrastructure across a compact national territory, but opportunity and young population remain concentrated around Seoul and major urban centres. OECD 2026 identifies regional decline, housing constraints and weakening local economies as mutually reinforcing, limiting ordinary spatial choice despite large national productive capacity.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.42 + -20.41 + -22.48 + -8.75 = -64.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +25.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +25.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+25.0 Original evidence category score+25.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 15.75 + -16.25 + 6.75 = 25.00

Base: 25.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +25.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 25.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.29 points

For South Korea, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +30.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — land-spatial-freedom domestic evidence retained

For South Korea, korea has strong infrastructure across a compact national territory, but opportunity and young population remain concentrated around Seoul and major urban centres. OECD 2026 identifies regional decline, housing constraints and weakening local economies as mutually reinforcing, limiting ordinary spatial choice despite large national productive capacity.

2026-10-11 OECD Economic Surveys: Korea 2026 · MOLIT — 2024 Korea Housing Survey
South Korea — Land Access & Spatial Freedom

For South Korea, korea has strong infrastructure across a compact national territory, but opportunity and young population remain concentrated around Seoul and major urban centres. OECD 2026 identifies regional decline, housing constraints and weakening local economies as mutually reinforcing, limiting ordinary spatial choice despite large national productive capacity.

2026-07-02 OECD Economic Surveys: Korea 2026 · MOLIT — 2024 Korea Housing Survey
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-57.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence +49.5

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-57.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-44.8× 25%= -11.2 points
Exact point calculation

92.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 23.00 weighted points

Original evidence +92.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +92.0; Money-gated reading -44.8 × 25% = -11.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For South Korea, korea combines very low homicide, broad public safety, parks, culture and strong everyday public infrastructure with weaker mental and emotional well-being. OECD 2026 reports life satisfaction at 6.4 in 2023 versus 7.3 across the OECD, while official 2025 cause-of-death data still show 14,144 suicides despite a year-on-year decline.

For South Korea, korea combines very low homicide, broad public safety, parks, culture and strong everyday public infrastructure with weaker mental and emotional well-being. OECD 2026 reports life satisfaction at 6.4 in 2023 versus 7.3 across the OECD, while official 2025 cause-of-death data still show 14,144 suicides despite a year-on-year decline.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-48.3× 35%= -16.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

80.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 28.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -48.3 × 35% = -16.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea combines very low homicide, broad public safety, parks, culture and strong everyday public infrastructure with weaker mental and emotional well-being. OECD 2026 reports life satisfaction at 6.4 in 2023 versus 7.3 across the OECD, while official 2025 cause-of-death data still show 14,144 suicides despite a year-on-year decline.

For South Korea, korea combines very low homicide, broad public safety, parks, culture and strong everyday public infrastructure with weaker mental and emotional well-being. OECD 2026 reports life satisfaction at 6.4 in 2023 versus 7.3 across the OECD, while official 2025 cause-of-death data still show 14,144 suicides despite a year-on-year decline.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-84.2× 25%= -21.1 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -84.2 × 25% = -21.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea combines very low homicide, broad public safety, parks, culture and strong everyday public infrastructure with weaker mental and emotional well-being. OECD 2026 reports life satisfaction at 6.4 in 2023 versus 7.3 across the OECD, while official 2025 cause-of-death data still show 14,144 suicides despite a year-on-year decline.

For South Korea, korea combines very low homicide, broad public safety, parks, culture and strong everyday public infrastructure with weaker mental and emotional well-being. OECD 2026 reports life satisfaction at 6.4 in 2023 versus 7.3 across the OECD, while official 2025 cause-of-death data still show 14,144 suicides despite a year-on-year decline.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-52.6× 15%= -7.9 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -52.6 × 15% = -7.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea combines very low homicide, broad public safety, parks, culture and strong everyday public infrastructure with weaker mental and emotional well-being. OECD 2026 reports life satisfaction at 6.4 in 2023 versus 7.3 across the OECD, while official 2025 cause-of-death data still show 14,144 suicides despite a year-on-year decline.

For South Korea, korea combines very low homicide, broad public safety, parks, culture and strong everyday public infrastructure with weaker mental and emotional well-being. OECD 2026 reports life satisfaction at 6.4 in 2023 versus 7.3 across the OECD, while official 2025 cause-of-death data still show 14,144 suicides despite a year-on-year decline.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.20 + -16.89 + -21.05 + -7.88 = -57.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +49.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +49.5. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -57.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+49.5 Original evidence category score+49.5 Contribution to national evidence score+3.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 23.00 + 28.00 + -11.25 + 9.75 = 49.50

Base: 49.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +49.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 49.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 3.06 points

For South Korea, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — peace-beauty-delight domestic evidence retained

For South Korea, korea combines very low homicide, broad public safety, parks, culture and strong everyday public infrastructure with weaker mental and emotional well-being. OECD 2026 reports life satisfaction at 6.4 in 2023 versus 7.3 across the OECD, while official 2025 cause-of-death data still show 14,144 suicides despite a year-on-year decline.

2026-10-11 OECD — Inclusive and Sustainable Well-being in Korea 2026 · Republic of Korea — 2025 Causes of Death Statistics
South Korea — Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

For South Korea, korea combines very low homicide, broad public safety, parks, culture and strong everyday public infrastructure with weaker mental and emotional well-being. OECD 2026 reports life satisfaction at 6.4 in 2023 versus 7.3 across the OECD, while official 2025 cause-of-death data still show 14,144 suicides despite a year-on-year decline.

2026-09-25 OECD — Inclusive and Sustainable Well-being in Korea 2026 · Republic of Korea — 2025 Causes of Death Statistics
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-59.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +42.0

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-59.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-48.3× 25%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -48.3 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For South Korea, the 5th National Biodiversity Strategy (2024-2028) targets protection or effective conservation of 30% of national territory and restoration of 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030. Korea retains substantial forest and ecological capacity, but high urban-industrial intensity, carbon pressure and biodiversity loss mean regeneration remains an active task rather than an achieved condition.

For South Korea, the 5th National Biodiversity Strategy (2024-2028) targets protection or effective conservation of 30% of national territory and restoration of 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030. Korea retains substantial forest and ecological capacity, but high urban-industrial intensity, carbon pressure and biodiversity loss mean regeneration remains an active task rather than an achieved condition.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-52.6× 35%= -18.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -52.6 × 35% = -18.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, the 5th National Biodiversity Strategy (2024-2028) targets protection or effective conservation of 30% of national territory and restoration of 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030. Korea retains substantial forest and ecological capacity, but high urban-industrial intensity, carbon pressure and biodiversity loss mean regeneration remains an active task rather than an achieved condition.

For South Korea, the 5th National Biodiversity Strategy (2024-2028) targets protection or effective conservation of 30% of national territory and restoration of 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030. Korea retains substantial forest and ecological capacity, but high urban-industrial intensity, carbon pressure and biodiversity loss mean regeneration remains an active task rather than an achieved condition.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-84.2× 25%= -21.1 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -84.2 × 25% = -21.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, the 5th National Biodiversity Strategy (2024-2028) targets protection or effective conservation of 30% of national territory and restoration of 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030. Korea retains substantial forest and ecological capacity, but high urban-industrial intensity, carbon pressure and biodiversity loss mean regeneration remains an active task rather than an achieved condition.

For South Korea, the 5th National Biodiversity Strategy (2024-2028) targets protection or effective conservation of 30% of national territory and restoration of 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030. Korea retains substantial forest and ecological capacity, but high urban-industrial intensity, carbon pressure and biodiversity loss mean regeneration remains an active task rather than an achieved condition.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-51.1× 15%= -7.7 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -51.1 × 15% = -7.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, the 5th National Biodiversity Strategy (2024-2028) targets protection or effective conservation of 30% of national territory and restoration of 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030. Korea retains substantial forest and ecological capacity, but high urban-industrial intensity, carbon pressure and biodiversity loss mean regeneration remains an active task rather than an achieved condition.

For South Korea, the 5th National Biodiversity Strategy (2024-2028) targets protection or effective conservation of 30% of national territory and restoration of 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030. Korea retains substantial forest and ecological capacity, but high urban-industrial intensity, carbon pressure and biodiversity loss mean regeneration remains an active task rather than an achieved condition.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.06 + -18.40 + -21.05 + -7.67 = -59.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +42.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +42.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -59.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+42.0 Original evidence category score+42.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 22.75 + -11.25 + 10.50 = 42.00

Base: 42.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +42.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 42.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.59 points

For South Korea, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — living-ground-resilience domestic evidence retained

For South Korea, the 5th National Biodiversity Strategy (2024-2028) targets protection or effective conservation of 30% of national territory and restoration of 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030. Korea retains substantial forest and ecological capacity, but high urban-industrial intensity, carbon pressure and biodiversity loss mean regeneration remains an active task rather than an achieved condition.

2026-10-11 Ministry of Environment — 5th National Biodiversity Strategy Implementation · OECD — Inclusive and Sustainable Well-being in Korea 2026
South Korea — Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

For South Korea, the 5th National Biodiversity Strategy (2024-2028) targets protection or effective conservation of 30% of national territory and restoration of 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030. Korea retains substantial forest and ecological capacity, but high urban-industrial intensity, carbon pressure and biodiversity loss mean regeneration remains an active task rather than an achieved condition.

2025-06-25 Ministry of Environment — 5th National Biodiversity Strategy Implementation · OECD — Inclusive and Sustainable Well-being in Korea 2026
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-54.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +57.8

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-54.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-44.8× 25%= -11.2 points
Exact point calculation

92.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 23.00 weighted points

Original evidence +92.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +92.0; Money-gated reading -44.8 × 25% = -11.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For South Korea, korea combines strong state capacity and exceptionally low homicide with relatively high rule-of-law performance. OECD reports fewer than one homicide per 100,000 and nearly 80% feeling safe walking alone at night in 2022-23; the 2025 World Justice Project index ranked Korea 19th of 143 jurisdictions. Institutional and gender-specific safety frictions remain.

For South Korea, korea combines strong state capacity and exceptionally low homicide with relatively high rule-of-law performance. OECD reports fewer than one homicide per 100,000 and nearly 80% feeling safe walking alone at night in 2022-23; the 2025 World Justice Project index ranked Korea 19th of 143 jurisdictions. Institutional and gender-specific safety frictions remain.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-46.8× 35%= -16.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

85.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 29.75 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -46.8 × 35% = -16.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea combines strong state capacity and exceptionally low homicide with relatively high rule-of-law performance. OECD reports fewer than one homicide per 100,000 and nearly 80% feeling safe walking alone at night in 2022-23; the 2025 World Justice Project index ranked Korea 19th of 143 jurisdictions. Institutional and gender-specific safety frictions remain.

For South Korea, korea combines strong state capacity and exceptionally low homicide with relatively high rule-of-law performance. OECD reports fewer than one homicide per 100,000 and nearly 80% feeling safe walking alone at night in 2022-23; the 2025 World Justice Project index ranked Korea 19th of 143 jurisdictions. Institutional and gender-specific safety frictions remain.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-78.4× 25%= -19.6 points
Exact point calculation

-25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.25 weighted points

Original evidence -25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -25.0; Money-gated reading -78.4 × 25% = -19.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea combines strong state capacity and exceptionally low homicide with relatively high rule-of-law performance. OECD reports fewer than one homicide per 100,000 and nearly 80% feeling safe walking alone at night in 2022-23; the 2025 World Justice Project index ranked Korea 19th of 143 jurisdictions. Institutional and gender-specific safety frictions remain.

For South Korea, korea combines strong state capacity and exceptionally low homicide with relatively high rule-of-law performance. OECD reports fewer than one homicide per 100,000 and nearly 80% feeling safe walking alone at night in 2022-23; the 2025 World Justice Project index ranked Korea 19th of 143 jurisdictions. Institutional and gender-specific safety frictions remain.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-49.7× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea combines strong state capacity and exceptionally low homicide with relatively high rule-of-law performance. OECD reports fewer than one homicide per 100,000 and nearly 80% feeling safe walking alone at night in 2022-23; the 2025 World Justice Project index ranked Korea 19th of 143 jurisdictions. Institutional and gender-specific safety frictions remain.

For South Korea, korea combines strong state capacity and exceptionally low homicide with relatively high rule-of-law performance. OECD reports fewer than one homicide per 100,000 and nearly 80% feeling safe walking alone at night in 2022-23; the 2025 World Justice Project index ranked Korea 19th of 143 jurisdictions. Institutional and gender-specific safety frictions remain.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.20 + -16.38 + -19.61 + -7.46 = -54.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +57.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +57.8. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -54.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+57.8 Original evidence category score+57.8 Contribution to national evidence score+3.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 23.00 + 29.75 + -6.25 + 11.25 = 57.75

Base: 57.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +57.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 57.75 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.97 points

For South Korea, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +7.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — justice-safety-friction domestic evidence retained

For South Korea, korea combines strong state capacity and exceptionally low homicide with relatively high rule-of-law performance. OECD reports fewer than one homicide per 100,000 and nearly 80% feeling safe walking alone at night in 2022-23; the 2025 World Justice Project index ranked Korea 19th of 143 jurisdictions. Institutional and gender-specific safety frictions remain.

2026-10-11 World Justice Project — Rule of Law Index 2025: Korea · OECD — Inclusive and Sustainable Well-being in Korea 2026
South Korea — Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

For South Korea, korea combines strong state capacity and exceptionally low homicide with relatively high rule-of-law performance. OECD reports fewer than one homicide per 100,000 and nearly 80% feeling safe walking alone at night in 2022-23; the 2025 World Justice Project index ranked Korea 19th of 143 jurisdictions. Institutional and gender-specific safety frictions remain.

2025-10-28 World Justice Project — Rule of Law Index 2025: Korea · OECD — Inclusive and Sustainable Well-being in Korea 2026
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-54.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +58.0

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-54.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-44.8× 25%= -11.2 points
Exact point calculation

92.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 23.00 weighted points

Original evidence +92.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +92.0; Money-gated reading -44.8 × 25% = -11.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For South Korea, korea has mature recycling infrastructure and extended resource-management policy. The Ministry of Environment reports a waste recycling rate reaching 86%, while the Circular Economy and Society framework added waste-generation-reduction indicators from 2025. High material throughput remains a friction, but recovery capacity is unusually strong.

For South Korea, korea has mature recycling infrastructure and extended resource-management policy. The Ministry of Environment reports a waste recycling rate reaching 86%, while the Circular Economy and Society framework added waste-generation-reduction indicators from 2025. High material throughput remains a friction, but recovery capacity is unusually strong.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-46.8× 35%= -16.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

85.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 29.75 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -46.8 × 35% = -16.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea has mature recycling infrastructure and extended resource-management policy. The Ministry of Environment reports a waste recycling rate reaching 86%, while the Circular Economy and Society framework added waste-generation-reduction indicators from 2025. High material throughput remains a friction, but recovery capacity is unusually strong.

For South Korea, korea has mature recycling infrastructure and extended resource-management policy. The Ministry of Environment reports a waste recycling rate reaching 86%, while the Circular Economy and Society framework added waste-generation-reduction indicators from 2025. High material throughput remains a friction, but recovery capacity is unusually strong.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-79.9× 25%= -20.0 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.0; Money-gated reading -79.9 × 25% = -20.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea has mature recycling infrastructure and extended resource-management policy. The Ministry of Environment reports a waste recycling rate reaching 86%, while the Circular Economy and Society framework added waste-generation-reduction indicators from 2025. High material throughput remains a friction, but recovery capacity is unusually strong.

For South Korea, korea has mature recycling infrastructure and extended resource-management policy. The Ministry of Environment reports a waste recycling rate reaching 86%, while the Circular Economy and Society framework added waste-generation-reduction indicators from 2025. High material throughput remains a friction, but recovery capacity is unusually strong.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-46.8× 15%= -7.0 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 12.75 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -46.8 × 15% = -7.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For South Korea, korea has mature recycling infrastructure and extended resource-management policy. The Ministry of Environment reports a waste recycling rate reaching 86%, while the Circular Economy and Society framework added waste-generation-reduction indicators from 2025. High material throughput remains a friction, but recovery capacity is unusually strong.

For South Korea, korea has mature recycling infrastructure and extended resource-management policy. The Ministry of Environment reports a waste recycling rate reaching 86%, while the Circular Economy and Society framework added waste-generation-reduction indicators from 2025. High material throughput remains a friction, but recovery capacity is unusually strong.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.20 + -16.38 + -19.97 + -7.03 = -54.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +58.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +58.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -54.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+58.0 Original evidence category score+58.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 23.00 + 29.75 + -7.50 + 12.75 = 58.00

Base: 58.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +58.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 58.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.39 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

For South Korea, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +7.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — durability-material-return domestic evidence retained

For South Korea, korea has mature recycling infrastructure and extended resource-management policy. The Ministry of Environment reports a waste recycling rate reaching 86%, while the Circular Economy and Society framework added waste-generation-reduction indicators from 2025. High material throughput remains a friction, but recovery capacity is unusually strong.

2026-10-11 Ministry of Environment — Land & Waste / Circular Economy · Ministry of Environment — Circular Economy Act implementation
South Korea — Durability, Repair & Material Return

For South Korea, korea has mature recycling infrastructure and extended resource-management policy. The Ministry of Environment reports a waste recycling rate reaching 86%, while the Circular Economy and Society framework added waste-generation-reduction indicators from 2025. High material throughput remains a friction, but recovery capacity is unusually strong.

2025-01-01 Ministry of Environment — Land & Waste / Circular Economy · Ministry of Environment — Circular Economy Act implementation
6% weight International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
-66.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +17.2

International score breakdown

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

-66.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Entry Accessibility 25%
See all nine International Welcome Entry Accessibility scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-54.6× 25%= -13.6 points
Exact point calculation

58.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 14.50 weighted points

Original evidence +58.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +58.0; Money-gated reading -54.6 × 25% = -13.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For South Korea, the K-ETA exemption is temporarily extended for eligible nationalities in 2026; it is not a general passport-based settlement right.

For South Korea, the Ministry of Justice reports foreign-resident and asylum statistics and operates status-dependent routes; the National Health Insurance Service describes enrolment of foreign residents. Visa, family-reunification, refugee recognition and residence rules are distinct; the documents do not prove unrestricted entry, automatic citizenship by birth or permanent family continuity.

🤔
Migrant Practical Life 30%
See all nine International Welcome Migrant Practical Life scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-62.6× 30%= -18.8 points
Exact point calculation

30.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -62.6 × 30% = -18.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For South Korea, the Justice Ministry publishes refugee processing data; the scale of recognition is far smaller than the asylum applications.

🤔
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome 25%
See all nine International Welcome Refugee / Neighbour Welcome scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.3× 25%= -20.3 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -81.3 × 25% = -20.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For South Korea, the Ministry of Justice reports 14,626 asylum applicants and 135 recognitions in 2025; this is a narrow protection outcome.

🤔
Flexibility / Continuity 20%
See all nine International Welcome Flexibility / Continuity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-67.8× 20%= -13.6 points
Exact point calculation

12.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 2.40 weighted points

Original evidence +12.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +12.0; Money-gated reading -67.8 × 20% = -13.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For South Korea, k-ETA short-stay convenience does not itself create family residence and protection continuity; asylum recognition remains restricted.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.64 + -18.79 + -20.33 + -13.56 = -66.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +17.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +17.2. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -66.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+17.2 Original evidence category score+17.2 Contribution to national evidence score+0.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 14.50 + 9.00 + -8.75 + 2.40 = 17.15

Base: 17.15 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +17.2 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 17.15 × (6.00 × 76.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 0.81 points

For South Korea, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 76% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.56%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — Flexibility / Continuity (international-access-human-welcome)

For South Korea, k-ETA short-stay convenience does not itself create family residence and protection continuity; asylum recognition remains restricted.

2026-10-11 Korea K-ETA authority / Ministry of Justice
2026 full review — South Korea — Refugee / Neighbour Welcome (international-access-human-welcome)

For South Korea, the Ministry of Justice reports 14,626 asylum applicants and 135 recognitions in 2025; this is a narrow protection outcome.

2026-10-11 Korea Ministry of Justice 2025 data
2026 full review — South Korea — Migrant Practical Life (international-access-human-welcome)

For South Korea, the Justice Ministry publishes refugee processing data; the scale of recognition is far smaller than the asylum applications.

2026-10-11 Korea Ministry of Justice Refugee Statistics
2026 full review — South Korea — Entry Accessibility (international-access-human-welcome)

For South Korea, the K-ETA exemption is temporarily extended for eligible nationalities in 2026; it is not a general passport-based settlement right.

2026-10-11 Republic of Korea K-ETA official notice
South Korea — International Access & Human Welcome

For South Korea, the Ministry of Justice reports foreign-resident and asylum statistics and operates status-dependent routes; the National Health Insurance Service describes enrolment of foreign residents. Visa, family-reunification, refugee recognition and residence rules are distinct; the documents do not prove unrestricted entry, automatic citizenship by birth or permanent family continuity.

2025-12-31 Republic of Korea Ministry of Justice — immigration and foreigners statistics · National Health Insurance Service — guidance for foreigners
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-62.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +29.8

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-62.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Positive Contribution 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-52.9× 25%= -13.2 points
Exact point calculation

64.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.00 weighted points

Original evidence +64.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +64.0; Money-gated reading -52.9 × 25% = -13.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For South Korea, oECD reports Korea provided development assistance in 2025; grants and loans must remain separately interpreted.

For South Korea, oDA Korea documents development cooperation. That is a positive recorded international activity, but independent recipient benefit, local mutuality, imported resource demand and overseas supply-chain harm require separate verification; diplomacy and ODA totals alone cannot establish a net non-extractive footprint.

🤔
Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-59.2× 25%= -14.8 points
Exact point calculation

42.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +42.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +42.0; Money-gated reading -59.2 × 25% = -14.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For South Korea, oECD development-cooperation reporting identifies recipients and spending, while verified local mutuality varies project by project.

🤔
Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-71.3× 35%= -24.9 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -71.3 × 35% = -24.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For South Korea, development funding totals do not independently prove all Korean overseas economic activity is non-extractive or free of harm.

🤔
Accountability / Repair 15%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-64.9× 15%= -9.7 points
Exact point calculation

22.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.30 weighted points

Original evidence +22.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +22.0; Money-gated reading -64.9 × 15% = -9.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For South Korea, oECD publishes structured scrutiny of Korean development finance; no comprehensive independent personal harm-repair ledger has been verified.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.21 + -14.79 + -24.94 + -9.74 = -62.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +29.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +29.8. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -62.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+29.8 Original evidence category score+29.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 16.00 + 10.50 + 0.00 + 3.30 = 29.80

Base: 29.80 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +29.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 29.80 × (6.00 × 76.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.40 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Exported waste / garbageAudit pending
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

For South Korea, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 76% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.56%. After normalization across South Korea’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026 full review — South Korea — Accountability / Repair (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For South Korea, oECD publishes structured scrutiny of Korean development finance; no comprehensive independent personal harm-repair ledger has been verified.

2026-10-11 OECD Korea development profile
2026 full review — South Korea — Documented Harm / Extraction (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For South Korea, development funding totals do not independently prove all Korean overseas economic activity is non-extractive or free of harm.

2026-10-11 OECD Korea development profile
2026 full review — South Korea — Mutuality / Local Benefit (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For South Korea, oECD development-cooperation reporting identifies recipients and spending, while verified local mutuality varies project by project.

2026-10-11 OECD Korea development profile
2026 full review — South Korea — Positive Contribution (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For South Korea, oECD reports Korea provided development assistance in 2025; grants and loans must remain separately interpreted.

2026-10-11 OECD Development Co-operation Profile Korea
South Korea — External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

For South Korea, oDA Korea documents development cooperation. That is a positive recorded international activity, but independent recipient benefit, local mutuality, imported resource demand and overseas supply-chain harm require separate verification; diplomacy and ODA totals alone cannot establish a net non-extractive footprint.

2025-12-31 ODA Korea — official development cooperation · International Energy Agency — Korea 2025 executive summary

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.