Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile
Kyrgyzstan 🇰🇬
Country profile & diagnostic reading
Data updatedResearch package completedHow the headline score is calculated
Evidence before Gate = Σ (published category score × category weight × research coverage) ÷ Σ (category weight × research coverage). The five-part Money Gate sets a proportional ceiling, with Friction already in the category evidence score.
Current evidence: +27.0 · Money Gate: 2.17/20 · Cash-register lock: +89.2 · Graded pressure: +89.2 · Headline: -64.8.
The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.
TBF Rank TBF Rank Rank compares only published profiles. It follows the TBF Abundance Score, not GDP size, and can move when a country score changes or when another country enters the published table. Read Small Island Abundance Theory
Global standing based on life reachability
KyrgyzstanLast recorded move: up from #146 to #144.Recent recorded movements
- #146 → #14411 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500
- #145 → #14311 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500
- #146 → #14411 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500
- #145 → #14611 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500
Rank journey · newest first
Latest rank shown first · scroll left for earlier records · tap any dot to see its rank
National Abundance Gate Money Gate Food, Housing / Land, Healthcare, Transportation and Water / Energy are four points each. All five must reach 4/4 before the country can cross zero. Money may still exist as an exchange tool; it cannot remain the permission slip for these five basics. Read Money Is a Weak Civilization Engine
Graded status · five basics not fully cleared
Research Coverage Research coverage Coverage tells you how much of the weighted domestic framework has publishable evidence. Missing research stays missing; it is not silently converted into a zero score. Explore Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
Coverage calculation
Sum of each published category weight × its verified research coverage ÷ 100. For the current country:
9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% = 88.00% weighted coverage
Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.
14 / 14 domestic categories scored; 2 / 2 international categories with documented research (scores require full audit)
GDP Rank GDP Rank GDP rank is context only. It can show how much money and production move through an economy, but it contributes zero points to the TBF Abundance Score. Read Make the World Truly Productive Again
Shown for context, not as the abundance ranking
Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0
Five basics stand between this country and zero
The five-part direct reading is still pending. Missing gate readings remain pending rather than being converted into invented free-access points.
Food Food · 4 points Full credit means nutritious food is ordinary civilization provision without a checkout or poverty test. School meals and other narrow institutional routes can earn limited partial credit without being mistaken for free food abundance. Read A Civilization Laid Out in Orchards
Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned
Housing / Land Housing / Land · 4 points Full credit means families can secure a home or suitable productive ground without rent, purchase price or mortgage debt deciding whether they may remain sheltered and grounded. Read the Distributed Founding Nuclei Strategy
Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned
Healthcare Healthcare · 4 points Full credit requires dependable no-payment care across prevention, primary care, maternity, dentistry, medicine, emergency treatment and necessary specialist care. Read Money Zombie Outbreaks
Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned
Transportation Transportation · 4 points Full credit means ordinary movement is free across the routes people actually need. A free Sunday, one route or a temporary promotion earns only limited credit. Read The Caterport: Free Human Movement
Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned
Water / Energy Water / Energy · 4 points Full credit requires both safe water and essential household energy to stay available without payment deciding whether cooking, cooling, washing, pumping or food preservation stops. Read Nucleus Formation Stewards
Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned
- FoodPending
- Housing / LandPending
- HealthcarePending
- TransportationPending
- Water / EnergyPending
- Money still neededNot measured
The existing transitional gate estimate is not split into invented category scores. Five direct category audits are still needed.
Why this reading is pending
The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.
Actual calculation
No category-level 0–4 point calculation is available until a direct Money Gate audit is completed.
A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.
Why 89.2 / 100?
The five direct Money Gate readings total 0–20. Every point removes five of the 100 payment-lock units; a 7/20 reading produces a 65/100 lock.
Actual calculation
100 - (2.17 × 5) = 89.15
Why 79.4 / 100?
Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.
Actual calculation
(100 - -58.69) ÷ 2 = 79.35 / 100
The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.
Why -44.6?
Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.
Actual calculation
89.15 = 89.15 (Friction already counted in category scores)
-50 + 2.5 × 2.17 = -44.6
The transitional value is derived from published domestic Reach and Friction rails only to preserve historical ordering. It is not a substitute for the five direct 0–4 gate findings above and can never clear the Money Gate.
16-category profile
All categories at a glance
All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale once verified. International Welcome and External Footprint remain pending until their rail scores are properly researched. Select a category for sourced findings and transparent calculations.
Category readings & evidence
Open any category for the full diagnostic reading
9% weight
Human Time & Burden Return
What this category measures
Whether productivity, infrastructure and institutions return usable lifetime to people and families.
TBFC targetNecessary contribution should not require people to sell most of their waking life merely to retain access to food, shelter, care and ordinary family life. Access-gate research questionHow much paid work or income-producing activity is required before an ordinary household can keep access to basic life, and what usable family time remains afterward? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Family Shubaka: protecting human and family time
+19.5↓
Score breakdown
Human Time & Burden Return
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Official 2024 poverty was 25.7% (1.871m people); 62% of poor people lived rurally. The 2025 Q3 subsistence minimum rose 11% year-on-year. Time abundance is assessed through paid work, informal work, unpaid care, commuting and administrative burden rather than output or employment alone.
Exact point calculation
42.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.70 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Official 2024 poverty was 25.7% (1.871m people); 62% of poor people lived rurally. The 2025 Q3 subsistence minimum rose 11% year-on-year. Time abundance is assessed through paid work, informal work, unpaid care, commuting and administrative burden rather than output or employment alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Official 2024 poverty was 25.7% (1.871m people); 62% of poor people lived rurally. The 2025 Q3 subsistence minimum rose 11% year-on-year. Time abundance is assessed through paid work, informal work, unpaid care, commuting and administrative burden rather than output or employment alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Official 2024 poverty was 25.7% (1.871m people); 62% of poor people lived rurally. The 2025 Q3 subsistence minimum rose 11% year-on-year. Time abundance is assessed through paid work, informal work, unpaid care, commuting and administrative burden rather than output or employment alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 15.00 + 14.70 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 19.45
Base: 19.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 19.45 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.99 points
This category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +18.0
What the evidence found
Official 2024 poverty was 25.7% (1.871m people); 62% of poor people lived rurally. The 2025 Q3 subsistence minimum rose 11% year-on-year. Time abundance is assessed through paid work, informal work, unpaid care, commuting and administrative burden rather than output or employment alone.
Poverty declined in 2024
8% weight
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
What this category measures
Whether adequate shelter physically exists and actually reaches people without excessive cost, exclusion or vacancy mismatch.
TBFC targetAdequate family shelter should remain reachable without lifetime dependence on rent, mortgage debt or ability to pay. Access-gate research questionWhat share of ordinary shelter access depends on rent, mortgage debt, purchase price or other recurring payment, and what dependable non-market routes exist at national scale? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Mother-Sight compound home
+27.5↓
Score breakdown
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
No reliable current national overcrowding, homelessness, tenure or housing-cost-burden measure was recovered in this run. Housing is judged on adequacy, affordability, resilience, security and ordinary household reach rather than construction volume alone.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
No reliable current national overcrowding, homelessness, tenure or housing-cost-burden measure was recovered in this run. Housing is judged on adequacy, affordability, resilience, security and ordinary household reach rather than construction volume alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
No reliable current national overcrowding, homelessness, tenure or housing-cost-burden measure was recovered in this run. Housing is judged on adequacy, affordability, resilience, security and ordinary household reach rather than construction volume alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
No reliable current national overcrowding, homelessness, tenure or housing-cost-burden measure was recovered in this run. Housing is judged on adequacy, affordability, resilience, security and ordinary household reach rather than construction volume alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 7.50 = 27.50
Base: 27.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 27.50 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.50 points
This category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
No reliable current national overcrowding, homelessness, tenure or housing-cost-burden measure was recovered in this run. Housing is judged on adequacy, affordability, resilience, security and ordinary household reach rather than construction volume alone.
Poverty declined in 2024
9% weight
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
What this category measures
Physical food and nutrient capacity, nourishment reach, waste/loss, public edible landscapes and free food access.
TBFC targetNutritious food should exist in multiplying abundance and remain reachable even when a household has no money to spend. Access-gate research questionCan people obtain adequate nutritious food when they cannot pay, and are free/public/productive-food routes large enough to be ordinary rather than exceptional? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Complete Reordering of Earth’s Food System
+19.5↓
Score breakdown
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
WFP reports 3.2m people cannot afford a nutritious diet and 1.8m live in poverty; 75% use negative coping strategies. 2025 nutrition analysis found stunting rose from 12% to 14%. Food production and market supply are separated from household affordability, diet quality, nutrition security and dependable public/free nourishment routes.
Exact point calculation
42.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.70 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
WFP reports 3.2m people cannot afford a nutritious diet and 1.8m live in poverty; 75% use negative coping strategies. 2025 nutrition analysis found stunting rose from 12% to 14%. Food production and market supply are separated from household affordability, diet quality, nutrition security and dependable public/free nourishment routes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
WFP reports 3.2m people cannot afford a nutritious diet and 1.8m live in poverty; 75% use negative coping strategies. 2025 nutrition analysis found stunting rose from 12% to 14%. Food production and market supply are separated from household affordability, diet quality, nutrition security and dependable public/free nourishment routes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
WFP reports 3.2m people cannot afford a nutritious diet and 1.8m live in poverty; 75% use negative coping strategies. 2025 nutrition analysis found stunting rose from 12% to 14%. Food production and market supply are separated from household affordability, diet quality, nutrition security and dependable public/free nourishment routes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 15.00 + 14.70 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 19.45
Base: 19.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 19.45 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.99 points
This category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +18.0
What the evidence found
WFP reports 3.2m people cannot afford a nutritious diet and 1.8m live in poverty; 75% use negative coping strategies. 2025 nutrition analysis found stunting rose from 12% to 14%. Food production and market supply are separated from household affordability, diet quality, nutrition security and dependable public/free nourishment routes.
Kyrgyz Republic country page
6% weight
Water & Sanitation Abundance
What this category measures
Safe water, sanitation, reliability, capture, reuse, storage and living-landscape water capacity.
TBFC targetSafe water and sanitation should be dependable life infrastructure, not conditional on household purchasing power. Access-gate research questionCan households retain safe water and sanitation when income falls, and which payment, disconnection or infrastructure barriers interrupt access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
+35.5↓
Score breakdown
Water & Sanitation Abundance
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
2023 MICS: about 4% lack safe drinking water; basic water access urban 100% vs rural 94%, Batken 82%. Only around 20% of households are connected to centralized sewerage. Water and sanitation are judged on safe household reach, continuity, quality, rural/urban distribution and affordability rather than infrastructure announcements alone.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
2023 MICS: about 4% lack safe drinking water; basic water access urban 100% vs rural 94%, Batken 82%. Only around 20% of households are connected to centralized sewerage. Water and sanitation are judged on safe household reach, continuity, quality, rural/urban distribution and affordability rather than infrastructure announcements alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
2023 MICS: about 4% lack safe drinking water; basic water access urban 100% vs rural 94%, Batken 82%. Only around 20% of households are connected to centralized sewerage. Water and sanitation are judged on safe household reach, continuity, quality, rural/urban distribution and affordability rather than infrastructure announcements alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
2023 MICS: about 4% lack safe drinking water; basic water access urban 100% vs rural 94%, Batken 82%. Only around 20% of households are connected to centralized sewerage. Water and sanitation are judged on safe household reach, continuity, quality, rural/urban distribution and affordability rather than infrastructure announcements alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 21.00 + -12.50 + 8.25 = 35.50
Base: 35.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 35.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.42 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +15.0
What the evidence found
2023 MICS: about 4% lack safe drinking water; basic water access urban 100% vs rural 94%, Batken 82%. Only around 20% of households are connected to centralized sewerage. Water and sanitation are judged on safe household reach, continuity, quality, rural/urban distribution and affordability rather than infrastructure announcements alone.
Water, sanitation and hygiene
5% weight
Energy & Household Capability
What this category measures
Whether usable, reliable energy reaches households and removes burdens across water, food, health, cooling, cooking and movement.
TBFC targetEssential household energy should support cooking, cooling, water, food preservation and care without money becoming the switch that turns basic capability on or off. Access-gate research questionCan households retain essential energy for cooking, cooling, water and food preservation when they cannot pay, and how often does price or disconnection reduce capability? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Solar Moon Panel
+35.5↓
Score breakdown
Energy & Household Capability
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Kyrgyzstan has vast hydropower potential; Kambarata-1 is expected to generate 5,600 GWh/year, almost half current output, but this is future capacity. 2025 reforms revise electricity/heating tariffs while safeguarding vulnerable households. Energy is judged on connection, reliability, affordability and household capability rather than generation or export capacity alone.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Kyrgyzstan has vast hydropower potential; Kambarata-1 is expected to generate 5,600 GWh/year, almost half current output, but this is future capacity. 2025 reforms revise electricity/heating tariffs while safeguarding vulnerable households. Energy is judged on connection, reliability, affordability and household capability rather than generation or export capacity alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Kyrgyzstan has vast hydropower potential; Kambarata-1 is expected to generate 5,600 GWh/year, almost half current output, but this is future capacity. 2025 reforms revise electricity/heating tariffs while safeguarding vulnerable households. Energy is judged on connection, reliability, affordability and household capability rather than generation or export capacity alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Kyrgyzstan has vast hydropower potential; Kambarata-1 is expected to generate 5,600 GWh/year, almost half current output, but this is future capacity. 2025 reforms revise electricity/heating tariffs while safeguarding vulnerable households. Energy is judged on connection, reliability, affordability and household capability rather than generation or export capacity alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 21.00 + -12.50 + 8.25 = 35.50
Base: 35.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 35.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.02 points
This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +15.0
What the evidence found
Kyrgyzstan has vast hydropower potential; Kambarata-1 is expected to generate 5,600 GWh/year, almost half current output, but this is future capacity. 2025 reforms revise electricity/heating tariffs while safeguarding vulnerable households. Energy is judged on connection, reliability, affordability and household capability rather than generation or export capacity alone.
Sustainable and Inclusive Growth Development Policy Operation
7% weight
Health & Care Reach
What this category measures
Whether prevention, primary care, medicine, maternity care, dentistry and specialist capability reach people when needed.
TBFC targetPrevention, maternity, dentistry, medicine and necessary treatment should be reachable because care is needed, not because payment can be produced. Access-gate research questionCan necessary care be obtained because it is needed, or do price, insurance, employment, debt or other financial tests materially delay or prevent access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: No Shrugging Our Shoulders at Family Suffering
+19.5↓
Score breakdown
Health & Care Reach
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
WHO reports 40.7% of health spending was out-of-pocket in 2021; most patients make inpatient and outpatient medicine co-payments, with urban-rural/mountain disparities. Health abundance is judged on actual care reach, financial protection, geographic access and service reliability rather than legal entitlement alone.
Exact point calculation
42.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.70 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
WHO reports 40.7% of health spending was out-of-pocket in 2021; most patients make inpatient and outpatient medicine co-payments, with urban-rural/mountain disparities. Health abundance is judged on actual care reach, financial protection, geographic access and service reliability rather than legal entitlement alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
WHO reports 40.7% of health spending was out-of-pocket in 2021; most patients make inpatient and outpatient medicine co-payments, with urban-rural/mountain disparities. Health abundance is judged on actual care reach, financial protection, geographic access and service reliability rather than legal entitlement alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
WHO reports 40.7% of health spending was out-of-pocket in 2021; most patients make inpatient and outpatient medicine co-payments, with urban-rural/mountain disparities. Health abundance is judged on actual care reach, financial protection, geographic access and service reliability rather than legal entitlement alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 15.00 + 14.70 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 19.45
Base: 19.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 19.45 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.55 points
This category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +18.0
What the evidence found
WHO reports 40.7% of health spending was out-of-pocket in 2021; most patients make inpatient and outpatient medicine co-payments, with urban-rural/mountain disparities. Health abundance is judged on actual care reach, financial protection, geographic access and service reliability rather than legal entitlement alone.
Health Systems in Action: Kyrgyzstan 2024
6% weight
Education & Human Capability
What this category measures
Foundational learning plus practical, technical and enduring civilization capability retained by people.
TBFC targetFoundational learning and useful capability should be reachable as part of civilization life rather than purchased according to family income. Access-gate research questionWhich essential learning and capability routes are genuinely reachable regardless of family income, and where do fees, debt or paid enrichment create decisive access gaps? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: What Is NoDumbDumbs?
+27.5↓
Score breakdown
Education & Human Capability
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Education reform is active through SmartEd and Learning for the Future, including inclusive education and full-day childcare; current national learning outcomes still require stronger direct measurement. Education is judged on real learning, access, completion, inclusion and human capability rather than enrolment alone.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Education reform is active through SmartEd and Learning for the Future, including inclusive education and full-day childcare; current national learning outcomes still require stronger direct measurement. Education is judged on real learning, access, completion, inclusion and human capability rather than enrolment alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Education reform is active through SmartEd and Learning for the Future, including inclusive education and full-day childcare; current national learning outcomes still require stronger direct measurement. Education is judged on real learning, access, completion, inclusion and human capability rather than enrolment alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Education reform is active through SmartEd and Learning for the Future, including inclusive education and full-day childcare; current national learning outcomes still require stronger direct measurement. Education is judged on real learning, access, completion, inclusion and human capability rather than enrolment alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 7.50 = 27.50
Base: 27.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 27.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.88 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
Education reform is active through SmartEd and Learning for the Future, including inclusive education and full-day childcare; current national learning outcomes still require stronger direct measurement. Education is judged on real learning, access, completion, inclusion and human capability rather than enrolment alone.
SmartEd partnership
4% weight
Mobility & Reachability
What this category measures
Local, regional and national movement that connects people to family, services, work, learning and public life without consuming excessive time.
TBFC targetOrdinary local and regional movement should be available for family, care, learning and civic life without travel becoming a paywall. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary people reach family, care, learning and public life without high recurring fares, vehicle costs, debt or fuel dependence? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Caterport: Free Human Movement
+19.5↓
Score breakdown
Mobility & Reachability
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
No sufficiently current authoritative nationwide road-condition, public-transport coverage, fare or travel-time dataset was recovered. Mobility is judged on safe, affordable reach to daily life, public transport, roads and geographic inclusion rather than infrastructure length alone.
Exact point calculation
42.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.70 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
No sufficiently current authoritative nationwide road-condition, public-transport coverage, fare or travel-time dataset was recovered. Mobility is judged on safe, affordable reach to daily life, public transport, roads and geographic inclusion rather than infrastructure length alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
No sufficiently current authoritative nationwide road-condition, public-transport coverage, fare or travel-time dataset was recovered. Mobility is judged on safe, affordable reach to daily life, public transport, roads and geographic inclusion rather than infrastructure length alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
No sufficiently current authoritative nationwide road-condition, public-transport coverage, fare or travel-time dataset was recovered. Mobility is judged on safe, affordable reach to daily life, public transport, roads and geographic inclusion rather than infrastructure length alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 15.00 + 14.70 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 19.45
Base: 19.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 19.45 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 0.88 points
This category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +18.0
What the evidence found
No sufficiently current authoritative nationwide road-condition, public-transport coverage, fare or travel-time dataset was recovered. Mobility is judged on safe, affordable reach to daily life, public transport, roads and geographic inclusion rather than infrastructure length alone.
Universal Water Supply and Sanitation Program
8% weight
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
What this category measures
Conditions that let people form stable families, raise children, multiply generations, share parental time and continue family life without punishing material barriers. New and re-reviewed profiles include total fertility as an explicit outcome signal.
TBFC targetPeople should be able to form, continue and multiply family life. Trott Bailey Family Civilization uses 5.0 children per woman as the fertility target; 2.1 is the replacement floor, not the aspiration, while housing, care, food and time should not be withheld behind financial thresholds. Access-gate research questionHow strongly do housing, childcare, health, food and work-income requirements delay or destabilize family formation and continuity, and is total fertility moving above replacement toward the 5.0-children-per-woman civilization target? Fertility methodNew and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Courtship, Marriage & Married Life
+27.5↓
Score breakdown
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Poverty, food affordability and childcare gaps materially burden families; 2025 education financing explicitly expands full-day childcare to help mothers and caregivers return to work. Family stability is judged on whether housing, care, income, childcare and public systems reduce burdens on family formation and child continuity.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Poverty, food affordability and childcare gaps materially burden families; 2025 education financing explicitly expands full-day childcare to help mothers and caregivers return to work. Family stability is judged on whether housing, care, income, childcare and public systems reduce burdens on family formation and child continuity.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Poverty, food affordability and childcare gaps materially burden families; 2025 education financing explicitly expands full-day childcare to help mothers and caregivers return to work. Family stability is judged on whether housing, care, income, childcare and public systems reduce burdens on family formation and child continuity.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Poverty, food affordability and childcare gaps materially burden families; 2025 education financing explicitly expands full-day childcare to help mothers and caregivers return to work. Family stability is judged on whether housing, care, income, childcare and public systems reduce burdens on family formation and child continuity.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 7.50 = 27.50
Base: 27.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 27.50 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.50 points
This category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion
First half — the established family and fertility assessment
The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.
Pre-policy score: +27.5
Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion
This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.
Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence
Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points
Final category calculation: +27.5 − 0 = +27.5 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)
Kyrgyzstan: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded by the 2026-10-10 legal-status review. Country is included in the 2026 legal-status survey under a status other than generally available domestic civil marriage. This describes legal status, not a demonstrated effect on birth rates.
Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2026-10-10 (access date; verify publication date in linked source) · Reviewed: 2026-10-10
Fertility and family policy: research and source notes
Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.
How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.
How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.
Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).
Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
Poverty, food affordability and childcare gaps materially burden families; 2025 education financing explicitly expands full-day childcare to help mothers and caregivers return to work. Family stability is judged on whether housing, care, income, childcare and public systems reduce burdens on family formation and child continuity.
Poverty declined in 2024
5% weight
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
What this category measures
Whether land and settlement choice reach ordinary people rather than opportunity being functionally trapped inside expensive commercial centres.
TBFC targetSuitable productive land and settlement opportunity should not be functionally reserved for those able to outbid everyone else. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary families gain secure use of suitable productive ground without first accumulating enough money to purchase, finance or outbid others? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Compounds Are Civilization Circulation Systems
+35.5↓
Score breakdown
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
A 2026 irrigation program targets 82,000 ha and 450,000 beneficiaries, with water conveyance efficiency expected to rise from 35% to at least 70%; this is funded future/partial implementation, not present universal access. Land abundance is judged on practical access, tenure, productive/open space and the ability of ordinary households to use space without prohibitive financial barriers.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
A 2026 irrigation program targets 82,000 ha and 450,000 beneficiaries, with water conveyance efficiency expected to rise from 35% to at least 70%; this is funded future/partial implementation, not present universal access. Land abundance is judged on practical access, tenure, productive/open space and the ability of ordinary households to use space without prohibitive financial barriers.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
A 2026 irrigation program targets 82,000 ha and 450,000 beneficiaries, with water conveyance efficiency expected to rise from 35% to at least 70%; this is funded future/partial implementation, not present universal access. Land abundance is judged on practical access, tenure, productive/open space and the ability of ordinary households to use space without prohibitive financial barriers.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
A 2026 irrigation program targets 82,000 ha and 450,000 beneficiaries, with water conveyance efficiency expected to rise from 35% to at least 70%; this is funded future/partial implementation, not present universal access. Land abundance is judged on practical access, tenure, productive/open space and the ability of ordinary households to use space without prohibitive financial barriers.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 21.00 + -12.50 + 8.25 = 35.50
Base: 35.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 35.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.02 points
This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +15.0
What the evidence found
A 2026 irrigation program targets 82,000 ha and 450,000 beneficiaries, with water conveyance efficiency expected to rise from 35% to at least 70%; this is funded future/partial implementation, not present universal access. Land abundance is judged on practical access, tenure, productive/open space and the ability of ordinary households to use space without prohibitive financial barriers.
National Irrigation Investment Program
6% weight
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
What this category measures
Peace of mind, social support, everyday safety, public beauty, recreation, nature, culture and delight reachable without constant payment.
TBFC targetBeauty, nature, recreation, rest and public delight should belong to ordinary life rather than appearing mainly after payment. Access-gate research questionHow much everyday rest, nature, recreation, culture and public beauty is freely reachable, rather than principally accessed through paid venues, travel or private property? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
+35.5↓
Score breakdown
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Kyrgyzstan has exceptional mountain, lake and pasture landscapes, but no current national leisure/public-space or subjective-wellbeing dataset was recovered. This category considers safety, environmental quality, public space, cultural/natural beauty and whether daily life leaves room for restoration and delight.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Kyrgyzstan has exceptional mountain, lake and pasture landscapes, but no current national leisure/public-space or subjective-wellbeing dataset was recovered. This category considers safety, environmental quality, public space, cultural/natural beauty and whether daily life leaves room for restoration and delight.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Kyrgyzstan has exceptional mountain, lake and pasture landscapes, but no current national leisure/public-space or subjective-wellbeing dataset was recovered. This category considers safety, environmental quality, public space, cultural/natural beauty and whether daily life leaves room for restoration and delight.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Kyrgyzstan has exceptional mountain, lake and pasture landscapes, but no current national leisure/public-space or subjective-wellbeing dataset was recovered. This category considers safety, environmental quality, public space, cultural/natural beauty and whether daily life leaves room for restoration and delight.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 21.00 + -12.50 + 8.25 = 35.50
Base: 35.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 35.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.42 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +15.0
What the evidence found
Kyrgyzstan has exceptional mountain, lake and pasture landscapes, but no current national leisure/public-space or subjective-wellbeing dataset was recovered. This category considers safety, environmental quality, public space, cultural/natural beauty and whether daily life leaves room for restoration and delight.
National Biodiversity Conservation Programme to 2040
6% weight
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
What this category measures
Whether soil, forests, wetlands, habitat, pollinators, species and water-holding landscapes are strengthening rather than being consumed.
TBFC targetRegenerating soil, water, habitat and food-bearing landscapes should be maintained as shared life-supporting capacity rather than only where a transaction makes them profitable. Access-gate research questionAre regenerative land, water and habitat functions maintained as life-supporting infrastructure even when no direct commercial return is available? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
+35.5↓
Score breakdown
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
2023 emissions were 19.38m tCO2e while ecosystems absorbed 10.31m tCO2e; the 2040 biodiversity programme is a strategic framework, not proof of restored ecosystems. Living ground is judged on biodiversity, ecological condition, climate resilience, water/soil systems and demonstrated restoration rather than plans alone.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
2023 emissions were 19.38m tCO2e while ecosystems absorbed 10.31m tCO2e; the 2040 biodiversity programme is a strategic framework, not proof of restored ecosystems. Living ground is judged on biodiversity, ecological condition, climate resilience, water/soil systems and demonstrated restoration rather than plans alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
2023 emissions were 19.38m tCO2e while ecosystems absorbed 10.31m tCO2e; the 2040 biodiversity programme is a strategic framework, not proof of restored ecosystems. Living ground is judged on biodiversity, ecological condition, climate resilience, water/soil systems and demonstrated restoration rather than plans alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
2023 emissions were 19.38m tCO2e while ecosystems absorbed 10.31m tCO2e; the 2040 biodiversity programme is a strategic framework, not proof of restored ecosystems. Living ground is judged on biodiversity, ecological condition, climate resilience, water/soil systems and demonstrated restoration rather than plans alone.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 21.00 + -12.50 + 8.25 = 35.50
Base: 35.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 35.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.42 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +15.0
What the evidence found
2023 emissions were 19.38m tCO2e while ecosystems absorbed 10.31m tCO2e; the 2040 biodiversity programme is a strategic framework, not proof of restored ecosystems. Living ground is judged on biodiversity, ecological condition, climate resilience, water/soil systems and demonstrated restoration rather than plans alone.
First Biennial Transparency Report
5% weight
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
What this category measures
Physical safety, usable justice, legal identity, reliable public administration and low needless institutional burden.
TBFC targetUsable justice, legal identity, safety and ordinary administration should remain accessible regardless of wealth. Access-gate research questionDo fees, legal costs, bail, fines, documentation costs or ability to hire expertise materially change access to justice, safety or public administration? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Pacorips Constitutional Foundations
+27.5↓
Score breakdown
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
In 2024 free legal aid delivered about 84,000 consultations and 16,092 qualified legal-assistance cases; 24 offices operate nationwide. Ombudsman review found 95% of courts/law-enforcement buildings inaccessible to persons with disabilities. Justice is judged on safety, legal access, administrative friction, accessibility and whether ordinary people can resolve problems without prohibitive cost or delay.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
In 2024 free legal aid delivered about 84,000 consultations and 16,092 qualified legal-assistance cases; 24 offices operate nationwide. Ombudsman review found 95% of courts/law-enforcement buildings inaccessible to persons with disabilities. Justice is judged on safety, legal access, administrative friction, accessibility and whether ordinary people can resolve problems without prohibitive cost or delay.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
In 2024 free legal aid delivered about 84,000 consultations and 16,092 qualified legal-assistance cases; 24 offices operate nationwide. Ombudsman review found 95% of courts/law-enforcement buildings inaccessible to persons with disabilities. Justice is judged on safety, legal access, administrative friction, accessibility and whether ordinary people can resolve problems without prohibitive cost or delay.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
In 2024 free legal aid delivered about 84,000 consultations and 16,092 qualified legal-assistance cases; 24 offices operate nationwide. Ombudsman review found 95% of courts/law-enforcement buildings inaccessible to persons with disabilities. Justice is judged on safety, legal access, administrative friction, accessibility and whether ordinary people can resolve problems without prohibitive cost or delay.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 7.50 = 27.50
Base: 27.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 27.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.56 points
This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
In 2024 free legal aid delivered about 84,000 consultations and 16,092 qualified legal-assistance cases; 24 offices operate nationwide. Ombudsman review found 95% of courts/law-enforcement buildings inaccessible to persons with disabilities. Justice is judged on safety, legal access, administrative friction, accessibility and whether ordinary people can resolve problems without prohibitive cost or delay.
Access to legal aid
4% weight
Durability, Repair & Material Return
What this category measures
Whether useful materials, infrastructure and goods are maintained, repairable, recovered and cycled instead of repeatedly becoming waste.
TBFC targetRepair, maintenance and useful material circulation should protect capability instead of forcing repeated repurchase as the default route to continued use. Access-gate research questionDo repair and maintenance remain practically accessible, or do pricing, proprietary restrictions and replacement incentives turn continued use into repeated purchasing? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Repair Is Sovereignty
+19.5↓
Score breakdown
Durability, Repair & Material Return
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Kyrgyzstan generates over 180,000 tonnes of household solid waste annually, up to 15% plastic, with only a small fraction recycled. EPR/recycling fees have been mandatory since Jan 2025 for 24 product groups. Durability is judged on repair, reuse, waste collection, recycling/material return and whether circular systems actually reach daily life.
Exact point calculation
42.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.70 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Kyrgyzstan generates over 180,000 tonnes of household solid waste annually, up to 15% plastic, with only a small fraction recycled. EPR/recycling fees have been mandatory since Jan 2025 for 24 product groups. Durability is judged on repair, reuse, waste collection, recycling/material return and whether circular systems actually reach daily life.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Kyrgyzstan generates over 180,000 tonnes of household solid waste annually, up to 15% plastic, with only a small fraction recycled. EPR/recycling fees have been mandatory since Jan 2025 for 24 product groups. Durability is judged on repair, reuse, waste collection, recycling/material return and whether circular systems actually reach daily life.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Kyrgyzstan generates over 180,000 tonnes of household solid waste annually, up to 15% plastic, with only a small fraction recycled. EPR/recycling fees have been mandatory since Jan 2025 for 24 product groups. Durability is judged on repair, reuse, waste collection, recycling/material return and whether circular systems actually reach daily life.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 15.00 + 14.70 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 19.45
Base: 19.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 19.45 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 0.88 points
Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions
A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.
No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.
This category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +18.0
What the evidence found
Kyrgyzstan generates over 180,000 tonnes of household solid waste annually, up to 15% plastic, with only a small fraction recycled. EPR/recycling fees have been mandatory since Jan 2025 for 24 product groups. Durability is judged on repair, reuse, waste collection, recycling/material return and whether circular systems actually reach daily life.
Plastic Waste Becomes a Resource in Batken
6% weight · research presentInternational Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending
The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.
Country findings and sources
As of June 2024 Kyrgyzstan hosted 272 refugees, 2,482 asylum-seekers and 60 known stateless people. It has an asylum framework and has historically naturalized roughly half of Tajik refugees. This category remains evidence-only. Entry, residence and participation pathways are recorded without collapsing them into a policy score.
Kyrgyz Republic country profile
6% weight · research presentExternal Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending
The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.
Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions
A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.
No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.
Country findings and sources
2023 gross GHG emissions were 19.38m tCO2e and ecosystem removals 10.31m, leaving 9.07m net tCO2e. Full consumption/supply-chain footprint was not recovered. This category remains evidence-only. No complete net audit of trade, extraction, emissions, finance, security, accountability and repair is collapsed into a policy score.
First Biennial Transparency ReportTrott Bailey Family Civilization Target
The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping
Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.
This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.
and then 
