Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile
China 🇨🇳
China currently ranks #167 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -68.02. This country is money-gated (1.75/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Transport and weakest in Human Time across 16 evidence categories.
Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.
Country profile & diagnostic reading
Tracking baselineEvidence through 9 Oct 2026How the headline score is calculated
Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.
Current evidence: +17.7 · Money Gate: 1.75/20 · Headline: -68.0.
The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.
TBF Rank TBF Rank Rank compares only published profiles. It follows the TBF Abundance Score, not GDP or money size, and can move when a country score changes or when another country enters the published table. Read Small Island Abundance Theory Challenge a score or supply new evidenceHeads of state, authorized representatives and evidence holders may submit documentation and request recalculation. A review never silently overwrites the previous rank or scoring record.Appeal China's score or request recalculation →
Global standing based on life reachability
243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries
ChinaLast recorded move: down from #166 to #167.Recent recorded movements
- #166 → #16721 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500
- #165 → #16621 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500
- #155 → #16520 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
- #155 → #15820 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
Rank journey · newest first
Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.
Research Coverage Research coverage Coverage reports the weighted share of categories with documented scoring and supporting source records. 100% means all category scoring slots have been assessed; it does not guarantee that every claim has been independently measured or that every family has no-payment access. Read the source and evidence limitations for each point. Explore Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
Coverage calculation
Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:
9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 80.0% + 6.0 × 78.0% = 97.48% weighted coverage
Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.
Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.
14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored
GDP and money rank GDP and money rank GDP and money rank are context only. They track monetized production, not how freely people access life, and contribute zero points to TBF Abundance. Read Make the World Truly Productive Again
GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking
Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0
Five basics stand between this country and zero The zero-line rule All five basics must reach 4/4 before a country can cross zero. Open any gate reading to see exactly why its points were assigned and review the source record. Reach-to-Money-Gate Clearance 2.0 These five gates measure effective no-payment access, not installed capacity alone. Under new source-backed reviews, 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 points track verified free access to 0%, some but less than 30%, 30%+, 50%+, 75%+ and 100% of the population respectively. The higher levels require reliable real use; 4/4 requires universally accessible, reliable service without ordinary charges or exclusions. Missing population figures remain pending. Older gate points remain archived until re-audited.
Food Food · 4 points Full credit means nutritious food is ordinary civilization provision without a checkout or poverty test. School meals and other narrow institutional routes can earn limited partial credit without being mistaken for free food abundance. Read A Civilization Laid Out in Orchards
Why 0.5 / 4?
The rural compulsory-education nutrition program provides subsidized or free institutional meals, not ordinary free food for all households.
Point calculation
0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Housing / Land Housing / Land · 4 points Full credit means families can secure a home or suitable productive ground without rent, purchase price or mortgage debt deciding whether they may remain sheltered and grounded. Read the Distributed Founding Nuclei Strategy
Why 0.0 / 4?
Housing is commercially purchased or rented; the national expenditure survey documents paid housing rather than a general free-land or free-home pathway.
Point calculation
0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Healthcare Healthcare · 4 points Full credit requires dependable no-payment care across prevention, primary care, maternity, dentistry, medicine, emergency treatment and necessary specialist care. Read Money Zombie Outbreaks
Why 1.0 / 4?
Basic medical insurance covers most residents but the governing health statute expressly includes insurance contributions and patient out-of-pocket expenditure.
Point calculation
1.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 25.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Transportation Transportation · 4 points Full credit means ordinary movement is free across the routes people actually need. A free Sunday, one route or a temporary promotion earns only limited credit. Read The Caterport: Free Human Movement
Why 0.0 / 4?
City transport remains fare-based and regulated; published 2026 municipal price schedules do not establish free ordinary transit nationwide.
Point calculation
0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Water / Energy Water / Energy · 4 points Full credit requires both safe water and essential household energy to stay available without payment deciding whether cooking, cooling, washing, pumping or food preservation stops. Read Nucleus Formation Stewards
Why 0.3 / 4?
Targeted water/electricity price waivers for hardship exist; utility bills and regulated tariffs remain ordinary household obligations.
Point calculation
0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
- Food0.5 / 4
- Housing / Land0.0 / 4
- Healthcare1.0 / 4
- Transportation0.0 / 4
- Water / Energy0.3 / 4
- Money still needed18.3 / 20
Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.
Why 1.8 / 20?
The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.
Actual calculation
Food 0.50 + Housing / Land 0.00 + Healthcare 1.00 + Transportation 0.00 + Water / Energy 0.25 = 1.75 / 20
A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.
Why 78.5 / 100?
Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.
Actual calculation
(100 - -56.93) ÷ 2 = 78.47 / 100
The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.
Why -45.6?
Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.
Actual calculation
-50 + 2.5 × 1.75 = -45.6
16-category profile
All categories at a glance
All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.
Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.
Category readings & evidence
Open any category for the full diagnostic reading
9% weight
Human Time & Burden Return
What this category measures
Whether productivity, infrastructure and institutions return usable lifetime to people and families.
TBFC targetNecessary contribution should not require people to sell most of their waking life merely to retain access to food, shelter, care and ordinary family life. Access-gate research questionHow much paid work or income-producing activity is required before an ordinary household can keep access to basic life, and what usable family time remains afterward? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Family Shubaka: protecting human and family time
-78.1↓Money-gated · Evidence -19.5
Money-gated · Evidence -19.5
Score breakdown
Human Time & Burden Return
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.8 × 25% = -13.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For China, annual 2025 average reported by NBS for employees of enterprises; this is an employed-enterprise measure, not a whole-population time-use measure.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
-20.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -7.00 weighted points
Original evidence -20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -20.0; Money-gated reading -78.3 × 35% = -27.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For China, average urban surveyed unemployment rate: 5.20 percent
Exact point calculation
-90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -22.50 weighted points
Original evidence -90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -90.0; Money-gated reading -97.3 × 25% = -24.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
China National Bureau of Statistics reports 48.6 hours weekly for employees of enterprises in 2025, excluding whole-population home labour and lacking a verified share above 55 hours.
For China, among participants in unpaid work in the 2024 national time-use survey, men averaged 1 hour 52 minutes per day and women 3 hours 29 minutes; participation rates differ. These are participant-only times, not the population-wide averages.
Trott Bailey Family writing on China examines 996-style work, long hours and the mismatch between economic production and time available for marriage, children and ordinary family life. It is retained as an explicitly authored interpretation layer beside official work-hour data.
Exact point calculation
-50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points
Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.0; Money-gated reading -86.4 × 15% = -13.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, participants in maternity insurance: 259.66 million people
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: -19.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -19.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -78.1.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + -7.00 + -22.50 + -7.50 = -19.50
Base: -19.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: -19.50 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = -1.80 points
For China, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +90.0
What the evidence found
For China, annual 2025 average reported by NBS for employees of enterprises; this is an employed-enterprise measure, not a whole-population time-use measure.
2026-10-10 National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaChina National Bureau of Statistics reports 48.6 hours weekly for employees of enterprises in 2025, excluding whole-population home labour and lacking a verified share above 55 hours.
2025-12-31 National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaFor China, among participants in unpaid work in the 2024 national time-use survey, men averaged 1 hour 52 minutes per day and women 3 hours 29 minutes; participation rates differ. These are participant-only times, not the population-wide averages.
2024-11-01 National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaTrott Bailey Family writing on China examines 996-style work, long hours and the mismatch between economic production and time available for marriage, children and ordinary family life. It is retained as an explicitly authored interpretation layer beside official work-hour data.
Trott Bailey FamilyPublished indicators
National Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
Source
8% weight
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
What this category measures
Whether adequate shelter physically exists and actually reaches people without excessive cost, exclusion or vacancy mismatch.
TBFC targetAdequate family shelter should remain reachable without lifetime dependence on rent, mortgage debt or ability to pay. Access-gate research questionWhat share of ordinary shelter access depends on rent, mortgage debt, purchase price or other recurring payment, and what dependable non-market routes exist at national scale? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Mother-Sight compound home
-76.6↓Money-gated · Evidence -14.0
Money-gated · Evidence -14.0
Score breakdown
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
Exact point calculation
85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points
Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 25% = -12.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For China, national household survey estimate; residence expenditure was 6,397 yuan per person and 21.7% of per-capita consumption expenditure.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
-35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -12.25 weighted points
Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -82.3 × 35% = -28.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For China, government-subsidized housing units started or made available: 1.21 million units
Exact point calculation
-80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -20.00 weighted points
Original evidence -80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -80.0; Money-gated reading -94.6 × 25% = -23.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, peer-reviewed research on Chinese cities finds that rising housing prices can delay marriage, while later research on migrants also finds higher rents associated with delayed marriage. The evidence supports treating housing as family infrastructure rather than only construction output.
Exact point calculation
-20.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.00 weighted points
Original evidence -20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -20.0; Money-gated reading -78.3 × 15% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, national household survey estimate; residence expenditure was 6,397 yuan per person and 21.7% of per-capita consumption expenditure.
For China, peer-reviewed research on Chinese cities finds that rising housing prices can delay marriage, while later research on migrants also finds higher rents associated with delayed marriage. The evidence supports treating housing as family infrastructure rather than only construction output.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: -14.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -14.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -76.6.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 21.25 + -12.25 + -20.00 + -3.00 = -14.00
Base: -14.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -14.0 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: -14.00 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = -1.15 points
For China, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +120.0
What the evidence found
For China, national household survey estimate; residence expenditure was 6,397 yuan per person and 21.7% of per-capita consumption expenditure.
2026-10-10 National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaFor China, peer-reviewed research on Chinese cities finds that rising housing prices can delay marriage, while later research on migrants also finds higher rents associated with delayed marriage. The evidence supports treating housing as family infrastructure rather than only construction output.
Cities / peer-reviewed researchPublished indicators
National Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
Source
9% weight
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
What this category measures
Physical food and nutrient capacity, nourishment reach, waste/loss, public edible landscapes and free food access.
TBFC targetNutritious food should exist in multiplying abundance and remain reachable even when a household has no money to spend. Access-gate research questionCan people obtain adequate nutritious food when they cannot pay, and are free/public/productive-food routes large enough to be ordinary rather than exceptional? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Complete Reordering of Earth’s Food System
-62.6↓Money-gated · Evidence +37.8
Money-gated · Evidence +37.8
Score breakdown
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
Exact point calculation
95.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 23.75 weighted points
Original evidence +95.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +95.0; Money-gated reading -47.0 × 25% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For China, nationwide output from survey across all 31 provincial-level regions; up 1.2% from 2024.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -57.9 × 35% = -20.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For China, prevalence of undernourishment: 2.50 percent
For China, children under five moderately or severely stunted: 4.50 percent
Exact point calculation
-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points
Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.0; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, food, tobacco and liquor share of per-capita consumption expenditure: 29.30 percent
Exact point calculation
15.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.25 weighted points
Original evidence +15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +15.0; Money-gated reading -68.7 × 15% = -10.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, nationwide output from survey across all 31 provincial-level regions; up 1.2% from 2024.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +37.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +37.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -62.6.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 23.75 + 19.25 + -7.50 + 2.25 = 37.75
Base: 37.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +37.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 37.75 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 3.49 points
For China, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +40.0
What the evidence found
For China, nationwide output from survey across all 31 provincial-level regions; up 1.2% from 2024.
2026-10-10 National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaPublished indicators
National Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceUnited Nations Statistics Division · 2023
SourceUnited Nations Statistics Division · 2024
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
Source
6% weight
Water & Sanitation Abundance
What this category measures
Safe water, sanitation, reliability, capture, reuse, storage and living-landscape water capacity.
TBFC targetSafe water and sanitation should be dependable life infrastructure, not conditional on household purchasing power. Access-gate research questionCan households retain safe water and sanitation when income falls, and which payment, disconnection or infrastructure barriers interrupt access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
-61.2↓Money-gated · Evidence +42.8
Money-gated · Evidence +42.8
Score breakdown
Water & Sanitation Abundance
Exact point calculation
90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points
Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -48.3 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For China, uN SDG profile measure of at least basic drinking-water services; it is not the stricter safely-managed service indicator.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.8 × 35% = -18.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For China, population using basic drinking water services: 96.10 percent
For China, population using basic sanitation services: 97.30 percent
For China, rural tap-water coverage: 96.00 percent
Exact point calculation
-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points
Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -82.3 × 25% = -20.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, population using safely managed sanitation services: 68.90 percent
For China, rural domestic sewage treatment rate: 55.00 percent
Exact point calculation
30.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points
Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -64.7 × 15% = -9.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, safely treated domestic wastewater flows: 64.00 percent
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +42.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +42.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -61.2.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 22.50 + 24.50 + -8.75 + 4.50 = 42.75
Base: 42.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +42.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 42.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.63 points
For China, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
For China, uN SDG profile measure of at least basic drinking-water services; it is not the stricter safely-managed service indicator.
2026-10-10 United Nations Statistics DivisionPublished indicators
United Nations Statistics Division · 2024
SourceUnited Nations Statistics Division · 2024
SourceUnited Nations Statistics Division · 2024
SourceUnited Nations Statistics Division · 2024
SourceState Council / Ministry of Water Resources · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
Source
5% weight
Energy & Household Capability
What this category measures
Whether usable, reliable energy reaches households and removes burdens across water, food, health, cooling, cooking and movement.
TBFC targetEssential household energy should support cooking, cooling, water, food preservation and care without money becoming the switch that turns basic capability on or off. Access-gate research questionCan households retain essential energy for cooking, cooling, water and food preservation when they cannot pay, and how often does price or disconnection reduce capability? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Solar Moon Panel
-60.5↓Money-gated · Evidence +45.3
Money-gated · Evidence +45.3
Score breakdown
Energy & Household Capability
Exact point calculation
100.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 25.00 weighted points
Original evidence +100.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +100.0; Money-gated reading -45.6 × 25% = -11.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For China, preliminary 2025 estimate; up 3.6% from 2024.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
80.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 28.00 weighted points
Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -51.1 × 35% = -17.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For China, preliminary 2025 estimate; up 3.6% from 2024.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.8 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, coal share of total energy consumption: 51.40 percent
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points
Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -61.9 × 15% = -9.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, clean energy share of total energy consumption: 30.40 percent
For China, renewable generation share of electricity use: 38.50 percent
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +45.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +45.3. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -60.5.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 25.00 + 28.00 + -13.75 + 6.00 = 45.25
Base: 45.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +45.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 45.25 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.32 points
For China, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
For China, preliminary 2025 estimate; up 3.6% from 2024.
2026-10-10 National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaPublished indicators
National Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Energy Administration · 2025
SourceNational Energy Administration · 2025
Source
7% weight
Health & Care Reach
What this category measures
Whether prevention, primary care, medicine, maternity care, dentistry and specialist capability reach people when needed.
TBFC targetPrevention, maternity, dentistry, medicine and necessary treatment should be reachable because care is needed, not because payment can be produced. Access-gate research questionCan necessary care be obtained because it is needed, or do price, insurance, employment, debt or other financial tests materially delay or prevent access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: No Shrugging Our Shoulders at Family Suffering
-61.2↓Money-gated · Evidence +42.8
Money-gated · Evidence +42.8
Score breakdown
Health & Care Reach
Exact point calculation
90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points
Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -48.3 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For China, end-2025 total, including 38 thousand hospitals and more than one million grass-root institutions.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 1.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points
Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.1 × 35% = -19.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For China, participants in basic medical insurance: 1,330.68 million people
For China, residents able to reach nearby healthcare facility within 15 minutes: 90.00 percent
Exact point calculation
-40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.00 weighted points
Original evidence -40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -40.0; Money-gated reading -83.7 × 25% = -20.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, maternal mortality ratio: 13.40 deaths per 100,000 live births
For China, average hospital stay cost: 9,768.90 yuan
For China, average outpatient visit cost: 357.70 yuan
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points
Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.2 × 15% = -8.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, average life expectancy: 79.25 years
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +42.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +42.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -61.2.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 22.50 + 22.75 + -10.00 + 7.50 = 42.75
Base: 42.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +42.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 42.75 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 3.07 points
For China, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +25.0
What the evidence found
For China, end-2025 total, including 38 thousand hospitals and more than one million grass-root institutions.
2026-10-10 National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaPublished indicators
National Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Health Commission of China · 2025
SourceNational Health Commission of China · 2025
SourceNational Health Commission of China · 2025
SourceNational Health Commission of China · 2025
SourceNational Health Commission of China · 2025
Source
6% weight
Education & Human Capability
What this category measures
Foundational learning plus practical, technical and enduring civilization capability retained by people.
TBFC targetFoundational learning and useful capability should be reachable as part of civilization life rather than purchased according to family income. Access-gate research questionWhich essential learning and capability routes are genuinely reachable regardless of family income, and where do fees, debt or paid enrichment create decisive access gaps? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: What Is NoDumbDumbs?
-62.0↓Money-gated · Evidence +39.8
Money-gated · Evidence +39.8
Score breakdown
Education & Human Capability
Exact point calculation
90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points
Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -48.3 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For China, national 2025 retention rate.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.8 × 35% = -18.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For China, nine-year compulsory education retention rate: 96.10 percent
For China, senior secondary gross enrollment ratio: 92.00 percent
For China, higher education gross enrollment ratio: 61.30 percent
Exact point calculation
-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points
Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.0; Money-gated reading -86.4 × 25% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, national 2025 retention rate.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points
Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.3 × 15% = -9.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, average years of schooling, population aged 16–59: 11.30 years
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +39.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +39.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -62.0.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 22.50 + 24.50 + -12.50 + 5.25 = 39.75
Base: 39.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +39.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 39.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.45 points
For China, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
For China, national 2025 retention rate.
2026-10-10 National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaPublished indicators
National Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceMinistry of Education of China · 2025
Source
4% weight
Mobility & Reachability
What this category measures
Local, regional and national movement that connects people to family, services, work, learning and public life without consuming excessive time.
TBFC targetOrdinary local and regional movement should be available for family, care, learning and civic life without travel becoming a paywall. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary people reach family, care, learning and public life without high recurring fares, vehicle costs, debt or fuel dependence? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Caterport: Free Human Movement
-59.6↓Money-gated · Evidence +48.5
Money-gated · Evidence +48.5
Score breakdown
Mobility & Reachability
Exact point calculation
100.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 25.00 weighted points
Original evidence +100.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +100.0; Money-gated reading -45.6 × 25% = -11.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For China, all-mode passenger traffic; NBS table reports 171.2 hundred-million person-trips.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
- -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
- -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
- -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
- -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
- 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
- +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
- +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
- +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
- +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points
Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -52.4 × 35% = -18.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For China, railway passenger traffic: 4.60 billion person-trips
Exact point calculation
-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points
Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -82.3 × 25% = -20.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, road traffic deaths per 10,000 vehicles: 1.25 deaths per 10,000 vehicles
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points
Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -61.9 × 15% = -9.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, passenger transport turnover: 3,554.56 billion person-kilometres
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +48.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +48.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -59.6.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 25.00 + 26.25 + -8.75 + 6.00 = 48.50
Base: 48.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +48.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 48.50 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.99 points
For China, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +25.0
What the evidence found
For China, all-mode passenger traffic; NBS table reports 171.2 hundred-million person-trips.
2026-10-10 National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaPublished indicators
National Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
Source
8% weight
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
What this category measures
Conditions that let people form stable families, raise children, multiply generations, share parental time and continue family life without punishing material barriers. New and re-reviewed profiles include total fertility as an explicit outcome signal.
TBFC targetPeople should be able to form, continue and multiply family life. Trott Bailey Family Civilization uses 5.0 children per woman as the fertility target; 2.1 is the replacement floor, not the aspiration, while housing, care, food and time should not be withheld behind financial thresholds. Access-gate research questionHow strongly do housing, childcare, health, food and work-income requirements delay or destabilize family formation and continuity, and is total fertility moving above replacement toward the 5.0-children-per-woman civilization target? Fertility methodNew and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Courtship, Marriage & Married Life
-78.0↓Money-gated · Evidence -19.0
Money-gated · Evidence -19.0
Score breakdown
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -57.9 × 25% = -14.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
China’s universal two-child policy took effect in January 2016, ending the one-child-era national policy framework. The historical restriction is relevant to today’s age structure and family history, but the metric does not treat it as the sole cause of current low fertility; housing, work time, marriage timing and other factors are also documented.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
5.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 1.75 weighted points
Original evidence +5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +5.0; Money-gated reading -71.5 × 35% = -25.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For China, crude birth rate: 5.63 per 1,000 population
For China, average family household size: 2.52 persons
Exact point calculation
-90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -22.50 weighted points
Original evidence -90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -90.0; Money-gated reading -97.3 × 25% = -24.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
China’s universal two-child policy took effect in January 2016, ending the one-child-era national policy framework. The historical restriction is relevant to today’s age structure and family history, but the metric does not treat it as the sole cause of current low fertility; housing, work time, marriage timing and other factors are also documented.
Exact point calculation
-80.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -12.00 weighted points
Original evidence -80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -80.0; Money-gated reading -94.6 × 15% = -14.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Trott Bailey Family writing on China argues that industrial and economic capability should be judged partly by whether it returns usable time and practical conditions to marriage, parenting and family formation. This authored reading is shown separately from national statistics.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: -19.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -19.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -78.0.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 13.75 + 1.75 + -22.50 + -12.00 = -19.00
Base: -19.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -19.0 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: -19.00 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = -1.56 points
For China, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion
First half — the established family and fertility assessment
The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.
Pre-policy score: -19.0
Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion
This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.
Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence
Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points
Final category calculation: -19.0 − 0 = -19.0 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)
China: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded in the cited legal-status review as of 2026-10-09. The guardianship/partnership mechanism described by some trackers is not civil marriage under the national Marriage and Family Civil Code. This is a legal-classification reading only; it does not prove demographic causation.
Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2020-05-28 · Reviewed: 2026-10-09
Fertility and family policy: research and source notes
Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.
How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.
How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.
Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).
Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.
Abundance Gap: +50.0
What the evidence found
China’s universal two-child policy took effect in January 2016, ending the one-child-era national policy framework. The historical restriction is relevant to today’s age structure and family history, but the metric does not treat it as the sole cause of current low fertility; housing, work time, marriage timing and other factors are also documented.
2026-10-10 National Health Commission of ChinaTrott Bailey Family writing on China argues that industrial and economic capability should be judged partly by whether it returns usable time and practical conditions to marriage, parenting and family formation. This authored reading is shown separately from national statistics.
Trott Bailey FamilyChina’s universal two-child policy took effect in January 2016, ending the one-child-era national policy framework. The historical restriction is relevant to today’s age structure and family history, but the metric does not treat it as the sole cause of current low fertility; housing, work time, marriage timing and other factors are also documented.
National Health Commission of ChinaPublished indicators
National Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceUnited Nations Population Division · 2025
SourceMinistry of Civil Affairs data reported by South China Morning Post · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
Source
5% weight
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
What this category measures
Whether land and settlement choice reach ordinary people rather than opportunity being functionally trapped inside expensive commercial centres.
TBFC targetSuitable productive land and settlement opportunity should not be functionally reserved for those able to outbid everyone else. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary families gain secure use of suitable productive ground without first accumulating enough money to purchase, finance or outbid others? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Compounds Are Civilization Circulation Systems
-77.4↓Money-gated · Evidence -17.0
Money-gated · Evidence -17.0
Score breakdown
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
Exact point calculation
90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points
Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -48.3 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For China, end-2025 permanent-resident urbanization rate; used as settlement concentration context, not as a direct measure of spatial freedom.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
-45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -15.75 weighted points
Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -85.0 × 35% = -29.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For China, the Distributed Founding Nuclei strategy treats land as living productive ground for homes, food, water, workshops and family capability. This authored standard is used to distinguish national territorial scale from ordinary family access to productive ground.
Exact point calculation
-80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -20.00 weighted points
Original evidence -80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -80.0; Money-gated reading -94.6 × 25% = -23.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, state-owned land supplied for real estate: 62.00 thousand hectares
Exact point calculation
-25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.75 weighted points
Original evidence -25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -25.0; Money-gated reading -79.6 × 15% = -11.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, end-2025 permanent-resident urbanization rate; used as settlement concentration context, not as a direct measure of spatial freedom.
For China, the Distributed Founding Nuclei strategy treats land as living productive ground for homes, food, water, workshops and family capability. This authored standard is used to distinguish national territorial scale from ordinary family access to productive ground.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: -17.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -17.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -77.4.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 22.50 + -15.75 + -20.00 + -3.75 = -17.00
Base: -17.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -17.0 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: -17.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = -0.87 points
For China, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +135.0
What the evidence found
For China, end-2025 permanent-resident urbanization rate; used as settlement concentration context, not as a direct measure of spatial freedom.
2026-10-10 National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaFor China, the Distributed Founding Nuclei strategy treats land as living productive ground for homes, food, water, workshops and family capability. This authored standard is used to distinguish national territorial scale from ordinary family access to productive ground.
Trott Bailey FamilyPublished indicators
National Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
Source
6% weight
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
What this category measures
Peace of mind, social support, everyday safety, public beauty, recreation, nature, culture and delight reachable without constant payment.
TBFC targetBeauty, nature, recreation, rest and public delight should belong to ordinary life rather than appearing mainly after payment. Access-gate research questionHow much everyday rest, nature, recreation, culture and public beauty is freely reachable, rather than principally accessed through paid venues, travel or private property? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
-67.0↓Money-gated · Evidence +21.5
Money-gated · Evidence +21.5
Score breakdown
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
Exact point calculation
80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points
Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -51.1 × 25% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For China, public libraries under national statistical reporting.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points
Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.3 × 35% = -22.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For China, public-library visits: 1,469.83 million person-visits
For China, sports venues: 5.00 million venues
For China, urban park green space per capita: 15.90 square metres/person
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.8 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, public libraries under national statistical reporting.
The Trott Bailey Family civilization standard treats beauty as public infrastructure for ordinary families rather than decoration reserved for commercial or prestige districts. China’s large library, park, tourism and sports asset base is therefore read through everyday access and use, not asset count alone.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
20.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.00 weighted points
Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -67.4 × 15% = -10.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
The Trott Bailey Family civilization standard treats beauty as public infrastructure for ordinary families rather than decoration reserved for commercial or prestige districts. China’s large library, park, tourism and sports asset base is therefore read through everyday access and use, not asset count alone.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +21.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +21.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -67.0.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 20.00 + 12.25 + -13.75 + 3.00 = 21.50
Base: 21.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +21.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 21.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.32 points
For China, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +45.0
What the evidence found
For China, public libraries under national statistical reporting.
2026-10-10 National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaThe Trott Bailey Family civilization standard treats beauty as public infrastructure for ordinary families rather than decoration reserved for commercial or prestige districts. China’s large library, park, tourism and sports asset base is therefore read through everyday access and use, not asset count alone.
Trott Bailey FamilyPublished indicators
National Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2024
Source
6% weight
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
What this category measures
Whether soil, forests, wetlands, habitat, pollinators, species and water-holding landscapes are strengthening rather than being consumed.
TBFC targetRegenerating soil, water, habitat and food-bearing landscapes should be maintained as shared life-supporting capacity rather than only where a transaction makes them profitable. Access-gate research questionAre regenerative land, water and habitat functions maintained as life-supporting infrastructure even when no direct commercial return is available? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
-63.0↓Money-gated · Evidence +36.3
Money-gated · Evidence +36.3
Score breakdown
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
Exact point calculation
80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points
Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -51.1 × 25% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For China, 2025 total afforestation area; 0.83 million hectares were afforested by manpower.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -57.9 × 35% = -20.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For China, national surface-water sections rated Grade I–III: 91.40 percent
Exact point calculation
-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points
Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -85.0 × 25% = -21.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, prefecture-level and above cities meeting air-quality standard: 72.60 percent
For China, national average PM2.5 concentration: 28.00 µg/m³
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -57.9 × 15% = -8.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, afforestation area: 3.56 million hectares
For China, grassland improved by planting/restoration measures: 4.93 million hectares
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +36.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +36.3. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.0.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 20.00 + 19.25 + -11.25 + 8.25 = 36.25
Base: 36.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +36.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 36.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 2.23 points
For China, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +25.0
What the evidence found
For China, 2025 total afforestation area; 0.83 million hectares were afforested by manpower.
2026-10-10 National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaPublished indicators
National Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceMinistry of Ecology and Environment of China · 2025
Source
5% weight
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
What this category measures
Physical safety, usable justice, legal identity, reliable public administration and low needless institutional burden.
TBFC targetUsable justice, legal identity, safety and ordinary administration should remain accessible regardless of wealth. Access-gate research questionDo fees, legal costs, bail, fines, documentation costs or ability to hire expertise materially change access to justice, safety or public administration? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Pacorips Constitutional Foundations
-65.8↓Money-gated · Evidence +26.0
Money-gated · Evidence +26.0
Score breakdown
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points
Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.1 × 25% = -13.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Official 2025 prosecution and work-safety data show falling serious-violent-crime prosecutions and accident deaths. The independent World Justice Project gives China a 2025 Rule of Law Index score around 0.48 and rank 92 of 143. These sources measure different things and are retained side by side rather than converted into a new political judgment score.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points
Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -60.6 × 35% = -21.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Official 2025 prosecution and work-safety data show falling serious-violent-crime prosecutions and accident deaths. The independent World Justice Project gives China a 2025 Rule of Law Index score around 0.48 and rank 92 of 143. These sources measure different things and are retained side by side rather than converted into a new political judgment score.
Exact point calculation
-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points
Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -85.0 × 25% = -21.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, people prosecuted for serious violent crimes including intentional homicide, robbery and kidnapping: 54.00 thousand people
For China, deaths due to work accidents: 18,261.00 deaths
For China, work-accident deaths in industrial, mining and commercial companies: 1.04 deaths per 100,000 employees
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points
Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.3 × 15% = -9.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Official 2025 prosecution and work-safety data show falling serious-violent-crime prosecutions and accident deaths. The independent World Justice Project gives China a 2025 Rule of Law Index score around 0.48 and rank 92 of 143. These sources measure different things and are retained side by side rather than converted into a new political judgment score.
Official 2025 prosecution and work-safety data show falling serious-violent-crime prosecutions and accident deaths. The independent World Justice Project gives China a 2025 Rule of Law Index score around 0.48 and rank 92 of 143. These sources measure different things and are retained side by side rather than converted into a new political judgment score.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +26.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +26.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -65.8.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 16.25 + 15.75 + -11.25 + 5.25 = 26.00
Base: 26.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +26.0 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 26.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.33 points
For China, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
Official 2025 prosecution and work-safety data show falling serious-violent-crime prosecutions and accident deaths. The independent World Justice Project gives China a 2025 Rule of Law Index score around 0.48 and rank 92 of 143. These sources measure different things and are retained side by side rather than converted into a new political judgment score.
2026-10-10 Supreme People’s Procuratorate / National Bureau of StatisticsOfficial 2025 prosecution and work-safety data show falling serious-violent-crime prosecutions and accident deaths. The independent World Justice Project gives China a 2025 Rule of Law Index score around 0.48 and rank 92 of 143. These sources measure different things and are retained side by side rather than converted into a new political judgment score.
Supreme People’s Procuratorate / National Bureau of Statistics · World Justice ProjectPublished indicators
Supreme People’s Procuratorate of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceWorld Justice Project · 2025
SourceSupreme People’s Procuratorate of China · 2025
Source
4% weight
Durability, Repair & Material Return
What this category measures
Whether useful materials, infrastructure and goods are maintained, repaired, recovered and cycled instead of becoming waste; documented harmful acceptance of imported garbage or disguised low-utility dumping is deducted.
TBFC targetRepair, maintenance and useful material circulation should protect capability instead of forcing repeated repurchase as the default route to continued use. Access-gate research questionDo repair and maintenance remain practically accessible, or do pricing, proprietary restrictions and replacement incentives turn continued use into repeated purchasing? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Repair Is Sovereignty
-61.1↓Money-gated · Evidence +43.3
Money-gated · Evidence +43.3
Score breakdown
Durability, Repair & Material Return
Exact point calculation
85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points
Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 25% = -12.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
NDRC relays the China Association of Circular Economy report: 417 million tonnes recovered in 2025, up 4.1%, with recovery value of 1.39 trillion yuan.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points
Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -56.5 × 35% = -19.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
NDRC relays the China Association of Circular Economy report: 417 million tonnes recovered in 2025, up 4.1%, with recovery value of 1.39 trillion yuan.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points
Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -82.3 × 25% = -20.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
NDRC relays the China Association of Circular Economy report: 417 million tonnes recovered in 2025, up 4.1%, with recovery value of 1.39 trillion yuan.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.75 weighted points
Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.1 × 15% = -8.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, comprehensive utilization rate of bulk solid waste: 60.00 percent
For China, scrap steel share of production raw material: 27.00 percent
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +43.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +43.3. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -61.1.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 21.25 + 21.00 + -8.75 + 9.75 = 43.25
Base: 43.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +43.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 43.25 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 1.77 points
For China, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +25.0
What the evidence found
NDRC relays the China Association of Circular Economy report: 417 million tonnes recovered in 2025, up 4.1%, with recovery value of 1.39 trillion yuan.
2026-10-10 National Development and Reform Commission of ChinaPublished indicators
National Development and Reform Commission of China · 2025
SourceNational Development and Reform Commission of China · 2025
SourceNational Development and Reform Commission of China · 2025
SourceNational Development and Reform Commission of China · 2025
SourceState Council Information Office of China · 2024
SourceState Council Information Office of China · 2024
Source
6% weight
International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
What this category measures
How easily visitors, migrants, refugees and neighbouring families can enter, remain, regularize status, prevent statelessness, build family continuity and participate in ordinary civic and economic life.
TBFC targetA country should have a humane vision for visitors, migrants, refugees and neighbouring families: practical entry, legal identity, family continuity, protection from statelessness, a route into ordinary life and a real place to contribute and grow with the society. Access-gate research questionWho can enter and stay, how wide is visa-free/eVisa/eTA reach, can newcomers regularize status and work, are refugees and children protected from statelessness, can families remain together, and does the country have a practical long-term vision for newcomers to join ordinary life and contribute? International scoring method
Welcome research checks practical entry breadth, visa-free/eVisa/eTA reach, lawful passport or citizenship pathways available to foreigners, birthright citizenship and statelessness prevention, parent/child family-status continuity, refugee recognition, migrant regularization, work/school/health access, family reunion and a credible national vision for newcomers to settle, contribute and grow with society.
A verified eVisa program open to more than 100 nationalities is recorded as a positive factual Welcome finding (the historical +5 scoring rule is retired). Researchers must verify the eligible-nationality breadth, not merely the existence of an online visa form. A lawful international citizenship/passport route available to qualifying foreigners is recorded as a Welcome access finding. The score must distinguish a usable transparent route from an expensive, narrow or highly discretionary program. Broad birthright citizenship, conditional territorial citizenship and statelessness safeguards are recorded with their precise legal eligibility and practical results. A system that leaves children without effective nationality, identity or durable status is a serious negative. A practical route that lets parents secure residence or citizenship through a child born in the country is documented for family-continuity review; long limbo, family separation or rules that strand the child between statuses reduce the score.
Refugee and migrant welcome is judged by lived access as well as admission: recognition, non-refoulement, legal documents, work, education, health care, family continuity, regularization, permanence and citizenship pathways all matter. Forced removal, refoulement, arbitrary detention, family separation and especially deporting or transferring people to unrelated third countries without a genuine durable-protection connection are negative Welcome evidence. Welcome is stronger when the country has a coherent plan for land, housing, work, contribution, family life and civic integration so newcomers are absorbed as people who can help the country grow, rather than warehoused indefinitely in camps or temporary limbo.
Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Refugee Living Should Be Glamorous, Purposeful and Liberating
-68.9↓Money-gated · Evidence +14.5
Money-gated · Evidence +14.5
International score breakdown
International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points
Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -56.5 × 25% = -14.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, inbound visits and short-stay openings include visa-free entry; short visits alone do not establish settlement rights.
China recorded 154.50 million inbound visits in 2025, including 35.17 million foreign visits and 30.08 million foreign trips under visa-free policies. As of August 20, 2026, 57 countries were eligible for 240-hour visa-free transit through 65 ports. UNHCR end-2025 data record 230 refugees and 482 pending asylum-seekers in China. These measures describe different travel and protection pathways and are not mechanically combined into a single welcome score.
Exact point calculation
20.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points
Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -67.4 × 30% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, uNHCR carries refugee-status determination; basic rights and route to ordinary life differ from transit permissions.
UNHCR’s current China profile reports roughly 1,160 persons of concern, including around 340 refugees, and separately notes 303,106 Indo-Chinese refugees who are de facto integrated pending regularization. Mainland China does not have a domestic asylum law and UNHCR conducts refugee-status determination. These facts are retained without converting refugee protection and short-term visa access into one welcome score.
Exact point calculation
-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points
Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.0; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, the refugee-law framework has significant institutional gaps and limited verified asylum pathways.
Exact point calculation
5.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 1.00 weighted points
Original evidence +5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +5.0; Money-gated reading -71.5 × 20% = -14.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, visitor volume is documented; reliable family-reunification and lasting legal continuity are not established by these arrivals.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +14.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +14.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -68.9.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 15.00 + 6.00 + -7.50 + 1.00 = 14.50
Base: 14.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +14.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 14.50 × (6.00 × 80.00%) ÷ 97.48 = 0.71 points
For China, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 80% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.80%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
What the evidence found
For China, visitor volume is documented; reliable family-reunification and lasting legal continuity are not established by these arrivals.
2026-10-10 Chinese National Immigration Administration / NBSFor China, the refugee-law framework has significant institutional gaps and limited verified asylum pathways.
2026-10-10 UNHCR ChinaFor China, uNHCR carries refugee-status determination; basic rights and route to ordinary life differ from transit permissions.
2026-10-10 UNHCR ChinaFor China, inbound visits and short-stay openings include visa-free entry; short visits alone do not establish settlement rights.
2026-10-10 National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaUNHCR’s current China profile reports roughly 1,160 persons of concern, including around 340 refugees, and separately notes 303,106 Indo-Chinese refugees who are de facto integrated pending regularization. Mainland China does not have a domestic asylum law and UNHCR conducts refugee-status determination. These facts are retained without converting refugee protection and short-term visa access into one welcome score.
UNHCRChina recorded 154.50 million inbound visits in 2025, including 35.17 million foreign visits and 30.08 million foreign trips under visa-free policies. As of August 20, 2026, 57 countries were eligible for 240-hour visa-free transit through 65 ports. UNHCR end-2025 data record 230 refugees and 482 pending asylum-seekers in China. These measures describe different travel and protection pathways and are not mechanically combined into a single welcome score.
National Bureau of Statistics / National Immigration Administration / UNHCRPublished indicators
National Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Immigration Administration of China · 2026
SourceUnited Nations High Commissioner for Refugees · 2025
SourceUnited Nations High Commissioner for Refugees · 2025
Source
6% weight
External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
What this category measures
Documented effects of a country beyond its borders: beneficial contribution, mutuality, external harm, extraction, repair, and verified deductions for exported garbage, waste or disguised low-utility dumping.
TBFC targetA civilization should increase useful local capability beyond its borders through medicine, training, disaster help, technical cooperation, peace-building and other mutually useful contribution, while avoiding extraction, exported harm and displacement. Access-gate research questionDo the country’s actions abroad increase health, skill, safety, resilience and locally retained capability, or do they export extraction, coercion, environmental harm, displacement, debt or other burdens? International scoring method
Legacy method: External Footprint documents independently verified beneficial action beyond the border, including medical missions, public-health help, scholarships, training, technical cooperation, disaster relief, humanitarian logistics, peacekeeping and other programs that leave useful capability with the receiving society. It also documents extractive conduct, exported environmental or human harm, coercive external security practices, abusive displacement outsourcing and whether documented harm is repaired, with a separately scored 6% category once four evidence-backed rails have been reviewed. Verified waste exports and disguised low-utility dumping are penalized through the transboundary harm ledger, as are irresponsible import acceptance practices through Domestic Durability & Material Return.
International contribution is investigated relative to capacity and quality, not raw size alone; documented outward activity is distinguished from independent benefit and local mutuality.
Dumping and harmful material transfers
Waste or disguised low-utility exports reduce External Footprint. Real reuse must be distinguished from disguised disposal. The sender retains responsibility for harms shifted abroad. Method v3: harmful imported garbage and low-utility dumping belong in External Footprint, where inbound transfer responsibility is 15% of the category. Historical method v2 import deductions remain archived under Domestic Durability until that country receives a sourced v3 score. Do not double-count.
Read the Trott Bailey Family work: When Another Nation Cleans Up Your Garbage
-74.5↓Money-gated · Evidence -6.0
Money-gated · Evidence -6.0
International score breakdown
External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points
Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -60.6 × 25% = -15.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
China documents substantial cross-border investment and overseas employment.
Exact point calculation
20.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 5.00 weighted points
Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -67.4 × 25% = -16.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, local overseas employment is measured; independently verified recipient benefit across projects is not complete.
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -19.25 weighted points
Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.8 × 35% = -30.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, cross-border output and emissions footprint are substantial; financial volume alone cannot establish net non-extraction.
China’s full 2025 outbound-investment bulletin reports total outward direct investment flow of about US$213.58 billion, overseas investment stock around US$3.4 trillion, roughly 58,000 overseas enterprises across 189 countries and regions, and 2.965 million local/foreign employees in overseas enterprises. Consumption-based CO2 emissions were about 10.9 billion tonnes in 2023. These establish scale and employment footprint but do not by themselves establish whether individual relationships are extractive or reciprocal.
China reported 1,040.4 billion yuan in non-financial outbound direct investment and 1,277.3 billion yuan in overseas contracted engineering revenue in 2025. Global Carbon Budget data report 10.9 billion tonnes of consumption-based CO2 emissions for 2023. These values establish scale and footprint but do not by themselves establish whether individual overseas relationships are extractive, reciprocal, beneficial or harmful.
Exact point calculation
-20.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.00 weighted points
Original evidence -20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -20.0; Money-gated reading -78.3 × 15% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For China, published footprint statistics do not amount to a complete independent harm-remediation ledger.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: -6.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -6.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -74.5.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 11.25 + 5.00 + -19.25 + -3.00 = -6.00
Base: -6.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -6.0 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: -6.00 × (6.00 × 78.00%) ÷ 97.48 = -0.29 points
Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions
A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.
China — 2024 export of plastic waste and scrap. Chinese customs 2024 records include plastic scrap exports; China also has a major restriction on plastic waste imports. A small positive import line, if reported, must not be mistaken for broad authorization or verified harm. The customs heading identifies traded material; neither permitted recycling nor proven harmful dumping follows from the heading. Source-level trade measurement is verified, downstream disposition is not.
2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade · View source ↗
World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade, 2024 reporter imports/exports, HS 3915; not a downstream inspection
China — 2024 export of worn clothing and other worn articles. 2024 customs records identify China as a major exporter of worn clothing: 1,147,550,000 kg; no shipment-level usable percentage established. A worn garment can be useful or trash; this audit has no shipment sorting/usable-share or recipient-facility record proving either outcome.
2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade · View source ↗
World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade, 2024 reporter imports/exports, HS 630900; not a downstream inspection
China — 2024 import of plastic waste and scrap. Chinese customs 2024 records include plastic scrap exports; China also has a major restriction on plastic waste imports. A small positive import line, if reported, must not be mistaken for broad authorization or verified harm. The customs heading identifies traded material; neither permitted recycling nor proven harmful dumping follows from the heading. Source-level trade measurement is verified, downstream disposition is not.
2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade · View source ↗
World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade, 2024 reporter imports/exports, HS 3915; not a downstream inspection
China — 2024 import of worn clothing and other worn articles. 2024 customs records identify China as a major exporter of worn clothing: 1,147,550,000 kg; no shipment-level usable percentage established. A worn garment can be useful or trash; this audit has no shipment sorting/usable-share or recipient-facility record proving either outcome.
2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade · View source ↗
World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade, 2024 reporter imports/exports, HS 630900; not a downstream inspection
2024 trade flows have been checked and linked above. Their harmful impact has not yet been independently verified; therefore no new deduction is assigned. Additional recipient-site evidence is required to close a harm audit.
For China, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 78% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.68%. After normalization across China’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
What the evidence found
For China, published footprint statistics do not amount to a complete independent harm-remediation ledger.
2026-10-10 Ministry of Commerce, ChinaFor China, cross-border output and emissions footprint are substantial; financial volume alone cannot establish net non-extraction.
2026-10-10 National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaFor China, local overseas employment is measured; independently verified recipient benefit across projects is not complete.
2026-10-10 Ministry of Commerce, ChinaChina documents substantial cross-border investment and overseas employment.
2026-10-10 Ministry of Commerce, ChinaChina’s full 2025 outbound-investment bulletin reports total outward direct investment flow of about US$213.58 billion, overseas investment stock around US$3.4 trillion, roughly 58,000 overseas enterprises across 189 countries and regions, and 2.965 million local/foreign employees in overseas enterprises. Consumption-based CO2 emissions were about 10.9 billion tonnes in 2023. These establish scale and employment footprint but do not by themselves establish whether individual relationships are extractive or reciprocal.
Ministry of Commerce of China · Global Carbon Budget / Our World in DataChina reported 1,040.4 billion yuan in non-financial outbound direct investment and 1,277.3 billion yuan in overseas contracted engineering revenue in 2025. Global Carbon Budget data report 10.9 billion tonnes of consumption-based CO2 emissions for 2023. These values establish scale and footprint but do not by themselves establish whether individual overseas relationships are extractive, reciprocal, beneficial or harmful.
National Bureau of Statistics / Global Carbon BudgetPublished indicators
National Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceNational Bureau of Statistics of China · 2025
SourceOur World in Data / Global Carbon Budget 2025 · 2023
SourceTrott Bailey Family Civilization Target
The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping
Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.
This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.
and then 
