Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile
Paraguay 🇵🇾
Country profile & diagnostic reading
Data updatedDataset rebuilt during live integrationHow the headline score is calculated
Evidence before Gate = Σ (published category score × category weight × research coverage) ÷ Σ (category weight × research coverage). The five-part Money Gate sets a proportional ceiling, with Friction already in the category evidence score.
Current evidence: +33.0 · Money Gate: 2.52/20 · Cash-register lock: +87.4 · Graded pressure: +87.4 · Headline: -62.6.
The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.
TBF Rank TBF Rank Rank compares only published profiles. It follows the TBF Abundance Score, not GDP size, and can move when a country score changes or when another country enters the published table. Read Small Island Abundance Theory
Global standing based on life reachability
ParaguayLast recorded move: up from #119 to #118.Recent recorded movements
- #119 → #11811 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500
- #116 → #11811 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500
- #118 → #11711 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500
- #119 → #11611 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500
Rank journey · newest first
Latest rank shown first · scroll left for earlier records · tap any dot to see its rank
National Abundance Gate Money Gate Food, Housing / Land, Healthcare, Transportation and Water / Energy are four points each. All five must reach 4/4 before the country can cross zero. Money may still exist as an exchange tool; it cannot remain the permission slip for these five basics. Read Money Is a Weak Civilization Engine
Graded status · five basics not fully cleared
Research Coverage Research coverage Coverage tells you how much of the weighted domestic framework has publishable evidence. Missing research stays missing; it is not silently converted into a zero score. Explore Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
Coverage calculation
Sum of each published category weight × its verified research coverage ÷ 100. For the current country:
9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% = 88.00% weighted coverage
Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.
14 / 14 domestic categories scored; 2 / 2 international categories with documented research (scores require full audit)
GDP Rank GDP Rank GDP rank is context only. It can show how much money and production move through an economy, but it contributes zero points to the TBF Abundance Score. Read Make the World Truly Productive Again
Shown for context, not as the abundance ranking
Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0
Five basics stand between this country and zero
The five-part direct reading is still pending. Missing gate readings remain pending rather than being converted into invented free-access points.
Food Food · 4 points Full credit means nutritious food is ordinary civilization provision without a checkout or poverty test. School meals and other narrow institutional routes can earn limited partial credit without being mistaken for free food abundance. Read A Civilization Laid Out in Orchards
Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned
Housing / Land Housing / Land · 4 points Full credit means families can secure a home or suitable productive ground without rent, purchase price or mortgage debt deciding whether they may remain sheltered and grounded. Read the Distributed Founding Nuclei Strategy
Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned
Healthcare Healthcare · 4 points Full credit requires dependable no-payment care across prevention, primary care, maternity, dentistry, medicine, emergency treatment and necessary specialist care. Read Money Zombie Outbreaks
Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned
Transportation Transportation · 4 points Full credit means ordinary movement is free across the routes people actually need. A free Sunday, one route or a temporary promotion earns only limited credit. Read The Caterport: Free Human Movement
Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned
Water / Energy Water / Energy · 4 points Full credit requires both safe water and essential household energy to stay available without payment deciding whether cooking, cooling, washing, pumping or food preservation stops. Read Nucleus Formation Stewards
Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned
- FoodPending
- Housing / LandPending
- HealthcarePending
- TransportationPending
- Water / EnergyPending
- Money still neededNot measured
The existing transitional gate estimate is not split into invented category scores. Five direct category audits are still needed.
Why this reading is pending
The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.
Actual calculation
No category-level 0–4 point calculation is available until a direct Money Gate audit is completed.
A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.
Why 87.4 / 100?
The five direct Money Gate readings total 0–20. Every point removes five of the 100 payment-lock units; a 7/20 reading produces a 65/100 lock.
Actual calculation
100 - (2.52 × 5) = 87.40
Why 77.1 / 100?
Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.
Actual calculation
(100 - -54.26) ÷ 2 = 77.13 / 100
The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.
Why -43.7?
Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.
Actual calculation
87.40 = 87.40 (Friction already counted in category scores)
-50 + 2.5 × 2.52 = -43.7
The transitional value is derived from published domestic Reach and Friction rails only to preserve historical ordering. It is not a substitute for the five direct 0–4 gate findings above and can never clear the Money Gate.
16-category profile
All categories at a glance
All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale once verified. International Welcome and External Footprint remain pending until their rail scores are properly researched. Select a category for sourced findings and transparent calculations.
Category readings & evidence
Open any category for the full diagnostic reading
9% weight
Human Time & Burden Return
What this category measures
Whether productivity, infrastructure and institutions return usable lifetime to people and families.
TBFC targetNecessary contribution should not require people to sell most of their waking life merely to retain access to food, shelter, care and ordinary family life. Access-gate research questionHow much paid work or income-producing activity is required before an ordinary household can keep access to basic life, and what usable family time remains afterward? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Family Shubaka: protecting human and family time
+22.3↓
Score breakdown
Human Time & Burden Return
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Non-agricultural informal occupation was 60.1% in 2025, about 1.663 million workers. Low headline unemployment therefore coexists with a very large employment-security burden, especially in rural areas and among women.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Non-agricultural informal occupation was 60.1% in 2025, about 1.663 million workers. Low headline unemployment therefore coexists with a very large employment-security burden, especially in rural areas and among women.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Non-agricultural informal occupation was 60.1% in 2025, about 1.663 million workers. Low headline unemployment therefore coexists with a very large employment-security burden, especially in rural areas and among women.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Non-agricultural informal occupation was 60.1% in 2025, about 1.663 million workers. Low headline unemployment therefore coexists with a very large employment-security burden, especially in rural areas and among women.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 15.75 + -17.50 + 5.25 = 22.25
Base: 22.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +22.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 22.25 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.28 points
This category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +30.0
What the evidence found
Non-agricultural informal occupation was 60.1% in 2025, about 1.663 million workers. Low headline unemployment therefore coexists with a very large employment-security burden, especially in rural areas and among women.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística Paraguay
8% weight
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
What this category measures
Whether adequate shelter physically exists and actually reaches people without excessive cost, exclusion or vacancy mismatch.
TBFC targetAdequate family shelter should remain reachable without lifetime dependence on rent, mortgage debt or ability to pay. Access-gate research questionWhat share of ordinary shelter access depends on rent, mortgage debt, purchase price or other recurring payment, and what dependable non-market routes exist at national scale? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Mother-Sight compound home
+31.5↓
Score breakdown
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
The 2022 census recorded large gains in household services, but 2025 multidimensional poverty still explicitly includes housing-and-services deprivation and is far higher in rural areas. Built capacity and practical household reach remain uneven.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
The 2022 census recorded large gains in household services, but 2025 multidimensional poverty still explicitly includes housing-and-services deprivation and is far higher in rural areas. Built capacity and practical household reach remain uneven.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
The 2022 census recorded large gains in household services, but 2025 multidimensional poverty still explicitly includes housing-and-services deprivation and is far higher in rural areas. Built capacity and practical household reach remain uneven.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
The 2022 census recorded large gains in household services, but 2025 multidimensional poverty still explicitly includes housing-and-services deprivation and is far higher in rural areas. Built capacity and practical household reach remain uneven.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 21.00 + -13.75 + 6.75 = 31.50
Base: 31.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +31.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 31.50 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.86 points
This category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +10.0
What the evidence found
The 2022 census recorded large gains in household services, but 2025 multidimensional poverty still explicitly includes housing-and-services deprivation and is far higher in rural areas. Built capacity and practical household reach remain uneven.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística Paraguay
9% weight
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
What this category measures
Physical food and nutrient capacity, nourishment reach, waste/loss, public edible landscapes and free food access.
TBFC targetNutritious food should exist in multiplying abundance and remain reachable even when a household has no money to spend. Access-gate research questionCan people obtain adequate nutritious food when they cannot pay, and are free/public/productive-food routes large enough to be ordinary rather than exceptional? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Complete Reordering of Earth’s Food System
+43.8↓
Score breakdown
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
Exact point calculation
90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Paraguay produced an above-average 2025 cereal crop: maize was about 5 million tonnes and paddy about 1.4 million tonnes. That physical abundance coexists with 16.0% monetary poverty and higher rural poverty, so food production is not treated as universal free nourishment.
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Paraguay produced an above-average 2025 cereal crop: maize was about 5 million tonnes and paddy about 1.4 million tonnes. That physical abundance coexists with 16.0% monetary poverty and higher rural poverty, so food production is not treated as universal free nourishment.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Paraguay produced an above-average 2025 cereal crop: maize was about 5 million tonnes and paddy about 1.4 million tonnes. That physical abundance coexists with 16.0% monetary poverty and higher rural poverty, so food production is not treated as universal free nourishment.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Paraguay produced an above-average 2025 cereal crop: maize was about 5 million tonnes and paddy about 1.4 million tonnes. That physical abundance coexists with 16.0% monetary poverty and higher rural poverty, so food production is not treated as universal free nourishment.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 22.50 + 22.75 + -11.25 + 9.75 = 43.75
Base: 43.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +43.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 43.75 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 4.47 points
This category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +25.0
What the evidence found
Paraguay produced an above-average 2025 cereal crop: maize was about 5 million tonnes and paddy about 1.4 million tonnes. That physical abundance coexists with 16.0% monetary poverty and higher rural poverty, so food production is not treated as universal free nourishment.
FAO GIEWS
6% weight
Water & Sanitation Abundance
What this category measures
Safe water, sanitation, reliability, capture, reuse, storage and living-landscape water capacity.
TBFC targetSafe water and sanitation should be dependable life infrastructure, not conditional on household purchasing power. Access-gate research questionCan households retain safe water and sanitation when income falls, and which payment, disconnection or infrastructure barriers interrupt access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
+41.5↓
Score breakdown
Water & Sanitation Abundance
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
The 2022 census reported current/piped water in 79.3% of occupied private dwellings and bathrooms with an appropriate sanitary-drain system in 85.7%. Access is substantial but incomplete, with territorial gaps.
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
The 2022 census reported current/piped water in 79.3% of occupied private dwellings and bathrooms with an appropriate sanitary-drain system in 85.7%. Access is substantial but incomplete, with territorial gaps.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
The 2022 census reported current/piped water in 79.3% of occupied private dwellings and bathrooms with an appropriate sanitary-drain system in 85.7%. Access is substantial but incomplete, with territorial gaps.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
The 2022 census reported current/piped water in 79.3% of occupied private dwellings and bathrooms with an appropriate sanitary-drain system in 85.7%. Access is substantial but incomplete, with territorial gaps.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 24.50 + -10.00 + 8.25 = 41.50
Base: 41.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 41.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.83 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +5.0
What the evidence found
The 2022 census reported current/piped water in 79.3% of occupied private dwellings and bathrooms with an appropriate sanitary-drain system in 85.7%. Access is substantial but incomplete, with territorial gaps.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística Paraguay
5% weight
Energy & Household Capability
What this category measures
Whether usable, reliable energy reaches households and removes burdens across water, food, health, cooling, cooking and movement.
TBFC targetEssential household energy should support cooking, cooling, water, food preservation and care without money becoming the switch that turns basic capability on or off. Access-gate research questionCan households retain essential energy for cooking, cooling, water and food preservation when they cannot pay, and how often does price or disconnection reduce capability? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Solar Moon Panel
+62.3↓
Score breakdown
Energy & Household Capability
Exact point calculation
100.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 25.00 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Paraguay consumed 29,419 GWh in 2025, supplied overwhelmingly by hydroelectric generation: Itaipú 87.6%, Yacyretá 10.5% and Acaray 1.9%. Physical electricity capacity is extraordinary, while household access and use still remain inside a tariffed grid system.
Exact point calculation
90.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 31.50 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Paraguay consumed 29,419 GWh in 2025, supplied overwhelmingly by hydroelectric generation: Itaipú 87.6%, Yacyretá 10.5% and Acaray 1.9%. Physical electricity capacity is extraordinary, while household access and use still remain inside a tariffed grid system.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Paraguay consumed 29,419 GWh in 2025, supplied overwhelmingly by hydroelectric generation: Itaipú 87.6%, Yacyretá 10.5% and Acaray 1.9%. Physical electricity capacity is extraordinary, while household access and use still remain inside a tariffed grid system.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
80.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 12.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Paraguay consumed 29,419 GWh in 2025, supplied overwhelmingly by hydroelectric generation: Itaipú 87.6%, Yacyretá 10.5% and Acaray 1.9%. Physical electricity capacity is extraordinary, while household access and use still remain inside a tariffed grid system.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 25.00 + 31.50 + -6.25 + 12.00 = 62.25
Base: 62.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +62.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 62.25 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 3.54 points
This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +10.0
What the evidence found
Paraguay consumed 29,419 GWh in 2025, supplied overwhelmingly by hydroelectric generation: Itaipú 87.6%, Yacyretá 10.5% and Acaray 1.9%. Physical electricity capacity is extraordinary, while household access and use still remain inside a tariffed grid system.
ANDE Paraguay
7% weight
Health & Care Reach
What this category measures
Whether prevention, primary care, medicine, maternity care, dentistry and specialist capability reach people when needed.
TBFC targetPrevention, maternity, dentistry, medicine and necessary treatment should be reachable because care is needed, not because payment can be produced. Access-gate research questionCan necessary care be obtained because it is needed, or do price, insurance, employment, debt or other financial tests materially delay or prevent access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: No Shrugging Our Shoulders at Family Suffering
+32.8↓
Score breakdown
Health & Care Reach
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
WHO/PAHO reporting for 2024-2025 documents active primary-care, maternal-health, surveillance and financial-protection work. The system has substantial capability, while territorial equity and financial hardship remain explicit areas of ongoing work.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
WHO/PAHO reporting for 2024-2025 documents active primary-care, maternal-health, surveillance and financial-protection work. The system has substantial capability, while territorial equity and financial hardship remain explicit areas of ongoing work.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
WHO/PAHO reporting for 2024-2025 documents active primary-care, maternal-health, surveillance and financial-protection work. The system has substantial capability, while territorial equity and financial hardship remain explicit areas of ongoing work.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
WHO/PAHO reporting for 2024-2025 documents active primary-care, maternal-health, surveillance and financial-protection work. The system has substantial capability, while territorial equity and financial hardship remain explicit areas of ongoing work.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 21.00 + -12.50 + 6.75 = 32.75
Base: 32.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +32.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 32.75 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.61 points
This category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +10.0
What the evidence found
WHO/PAHO reporting for 2024-2025 documents active primary-care, maternal-health, surveillance and financial-protection work. The system has substantial capability, while territorial equity and financial hardship remain explicit areas of ongoing work.
World Health Organization
6% weight
Education & Human Capability
What this category measures
Foundational learning plus practical, technical and enduring civilization capability retained by people.
TBFC targetFoundational learning and useful capability should be reachable as part of civilization life rather than purchased according to family income. Access-gate research questionWhich essential learning and capability routes are genuinely reachable regardless of family income, and where do fees, debt or paid enrichment create decisive access gaps? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: What Is NoDumbDumbs?
+32.3↓
Score breakdown
Education & Human Capability
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
A Ministry/UNICEF reintegration initiative returned more than 37,000 children to school and delivered targeted literacy and mathematics support, while UNICEF notes that exclusion remains material. The evidence shows real recovery capacity alongside continuing reach gaps.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
A Ministry/UNICEF reintegration initiative returned more than 37,000 children to school and delivered targeted literacy and mathematics support, while UNICEF notes that exclusion remains material. The evidence shows real recovery capacity alongside continuing reach gaps.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
A Ministry/UNICEF reintegration initiative returned more than 37,000 children to school and delivered targeted literacy and mathematics support, while UNICEF notes that exclusion remains material. The evidence shows real recovery capacity alongside continuing reach gaps.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
A Ministry/UNICEF reintegration initiative returned more than 37,000 children to school and delivered targeted literacy and mathematics support, while UNICEF notes that exclusion remains material. The evidence shows real recovery capacity alongside continuing reach gaps.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 21.00 + -13.75 + 7.50 = 32.25
Base: 32.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +32.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 32.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.20 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +10.0
What the evidence found
A Ministry/UNICEF reintegration initiative returned more than 37,000 children to school and delivered targeted literacy and mathematics support, while UNICEF notes that exclusion remains material. The evidence shows real recovery capacity alongside continuing reach gaps.
UNICEF Paraguay
4% weight
Mobility & Reachability
What this category measures
Local, regional and national movement that connects people to family, services, work, learning and public life without consuming excessive time.
TBFC targetOrdinary local and regional movement should be available for family, care, learning and civic life without travel becoming a paywall. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary people reach family, care, learning and public life without high recurring fares, vehicle costs, debt or fuel dependence? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Caterport: Free Human Movement
+26.8↓
Score breakdown
Mobility & Reachability
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Current road-connectivity investment targets routes across five departments and about 385,000 residents, explicitly aiming to reduce travel time and cost and improve access to markets, jobs and services. The need for the project itself records existing reachability friction.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Current road-connectivity investment targets routes across five departments and about 385,000 residents, explicitly aiming to reduce travel time and cost and improve access to markets, jobs and services. The need for the project itself records existing reachability friction.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Current road-connectivity investment targets routes across five departments and about 385,000 residents, explicitly aiming to reduce travel time and cost and improve access to markets, jobs and services. The need for the project itself records existing reachability friction.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Current road-connectivity investment targets routes across five departments and about 385,000 residents, explicitly aiming to reduce travel time and cost and improve access to markets, jobs and services. The need for the project itself records existing reachability friction.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 6.75 = 26.75
Base: 26.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +26.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 26.75 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.22 points
This category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
Current road-connectivity investment targets routes across five departments and about 385,000 residents, explicitly aiming to reduce travel time and cost and improve access to markets, jobs and services. The need for the project itself records existing reachability friction.
Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Comunicaciones Paraguay
8% weight
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
What this category measures
Conditions that let people form stable families, raise children, multiply generations, share parental time and continue family life without punishing material barriers. New and re-reviewed profiles include total fertility as an explicit outcome signal.
TBFC targetPeople should be able to form, continue and multiply family life. Trott Bailey Family Civilization uses 5.0 children per woman as the fertility target; 2.1 is the replacement floor, not the aspiration, while housing, care, food and time should not be withheld behind financial thresholds. Access-gate research questionHow strongly do housing, childcare, health, food and work-income requirements delay or destabilize family formation and continuity, and is total fertility moving above replacement toward the 5.0-children-per-woman civilization target? Fertility methodNew and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Courtship, Marriage & Married Life
+26.8↓
Score breakdown
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Monetary poverty was 16.0% in 2025, rising to 22.1% in rural areas. Multidimensional poverty was 13.5% nationally and 30.3% rurally, directly constraining household and child stability despite growing national productive capacity.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Monetary poverty was 16.0% in 2025, rising to 22.1% in rural areas. Multidimensional poverty was 13.5% nationally and 30.3% rurally, directly constraining household and child stability despite growing national productive capacity.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Monetary poverty was 16.0% in 2025, rising to 22.1% in rural areas. Multidimensional poverty was 13.5% nationally and 30.3% rurally, directly constraining household and child stability despite growing national productive capacity.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Monetary poverty was 16.0% in 2025, rising to 22.1% in rural areas. Multidimensional poverty was 13.5% nationally and 30.3% rurally, directly constraining household and child stability despite growing national productive capacity.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 16.25 + 17.50 + -13.75 + 6.75 = 26.75
Base: 26.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +26.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 26.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.43 points
This category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion
First half — the established family and fertility assessment
The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.
Pre-policy score: +26.8
Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion
This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.
Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence
Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points
Final category calculation: +26.8 − 0 = +26.8 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)
Paraguay: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded in the cited legal-status review as of 2026-10-09. This is a legal-classification reading only; it does not prove demographic causation.
Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2026-10-09 (access date) · Reviewed: 2026-10-09
Fertility and family policy: research and source notes
Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.
How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.
How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.
Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).
Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.
Abundance Gap: +15.0
What the evidence found
Monetary poverty was 16.0% in 2025, rising to 22.1% in rural areas. Multidimensional poverty was 13.5% nationally and 30.3% rurally, directly constraining household and child stability despite growing national productive capacity.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística Paraguay
5% weight
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
What this category measures
Whether land and settlement choice reach ordinary people rather than opportunity being functionally trapped inside expensive commercial centres.
TBFC targetSuitable productive land and settlement opportunity should not be functionally reserved for those able to outbid everyone else. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary families gain secure use of suitable productive ground without first accumulating enough money to purchase, finance or outbid others? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Compounds Are Civilization Circulation Systems
+23.5↓
Score breakdown
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
Exact point calculation
90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Paraguay has very large agricultural and rural productive capacity, but the live audit did not find a sufficiently current national measure proving broad household access to productive land. Capacity is therefore scored high while reach and gate friction remain conservative.
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Paraguay has very large agricultural and rural productive capacity, but the live audit did not find a sufficiently current national measure proving broad household access to productive land. Capacity is therefore scored high while reach and gate friction remain conservative.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -18.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Paraguay has very large agricultural and rural productive capacity, but the live audit did not find a sufficiently current national measure proving broad household access to productive land. Capacity is therefore scored high while reach and gate friction remain conservative.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Paraguay has very large agricultural and rural productive capacity, but the live audit did not find a sufficiently current national measure proving broad household access to productive land. Capacity is therefore scored high while reach and gate friction remain conservative.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 22.50 + 12.25 + -18.75 + 7.50 = 23.50
Base: 23.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +23.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 23.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.34 points
This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +55.0
What the evidence found
Paraguay has very large agricultural and rural productive capacity, but the live audit did not find a sufficiently current national measure proving broad household access to productive land. Capacity is therefore scored high while reach and gate friction remain conservative.
FAO Paraguay
6% weight
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
What this category measures
Peace of mind, social support, everyday safety, public beauty, recreation, nature, culture and delight reachable without constant payment.
TBFC targetBeauty, nature, recreation, rest and public delight should belong to ordinary life rather than appearing mainly after payment. Access-gate research questionHow much everyday rest, nature, recreation, culture and public beauty is freely reachable, rather than principally accessed through paid venues, travel or private property? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
+38.8↓
Score breakdown
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
Exact point calculation
80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Paraguay contains extensive river, forest and protected landscapes and maintains a national protected-area system. Public natural wealth is meaningful, but poverty, service gaps and uneven accessibility prevent treating landscape capacity as universal lived delight.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Paraguay contains extensive river, forest and protected landscapes and maintains a national protected-area system. Public natural wealth is meaningful, but poverty, service gaps and uneven accessibility prevent treating landscape capacity as universal lived delight.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Paraguay contains extensive river, forest and protected landscapes and maintains a national protected-area system. Public natural wealth is meaningful, but poverty, service gaps and uneven accessibility prevent treating landscape capacity as universal lived delight.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Paraguay contains extensive river, forest and protected landscapes and maintains a national protected-area system. Public natural wealth is meaningful, but poverty, service gaps and uneven accessibility prevent treating landscape capacity as universal lived delight.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 20.00 + 21.00 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 38.75
Base: 38.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +38.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 38.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.64 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
Paraguay contains extensive river, forest and protected landscapes and maintains a national protected-area system. Public natural wealth is meaningful, but poverty, service gaps and uneven accessibility prevent treating landscape capacity as universal lived delight.
Ministerio del Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible Paraguay
6% weight
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
What this category measures
Whether soil, forests, wetlands, habitat, pollinators, species and water-holding landscapes are strengthening rather than being consumed.
TBFC targetRegenerating soil, water, habitat and food-bearing landscapes should be maintained as shared life-supporting capacity rather than only where a transaction makes them profitable. Access-gate research questionAre regenerative land, water and habitat functions maintained as life-supporting infrastructure even when no direct commercial return is available? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
+31.3↓
Score breakdown
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
Exact point calculation
80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
The 2025-2030 SINASIP plan reports 128 protected areas covering about 15% of national territory and identifies management challenges. This is substantial conservation capacity, while biodiversity recovery and ecosystem condition remain incomplete outcomes.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
The 2025-2030 SINASIP plan reports 128 protected areas covering about 15% of national territory and identifies management challenges. This is substantial conservation capacity, while biodiversity recovery and ecosystem condition remain incomplete outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
The 2025-2030 SINASIP plan reports 128 protected areas covering about 15% of national territory and identifies management challenges. This is substantial conservation capacity, while biodiversity recovery and ecosystem condition remain incomplete outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
The 2025-2030 SINASIP plan reports 128 protected areas covering about 15% of national territory and identifies management challenges. This is substantial conservation capacity, while biodiversity recovery and ecosystem condition remain incomplete outcomes.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 20.00 + 19.25 + -16.25 + 8.25 = 31.25
Base: 31.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +31.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 31.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.13 points
This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +25.0
What the evidence found
The 2025-2030 SINASIP plan reports 128 protected areas covering about 15% of national territory and identifies management challenges. This is substantial conservation capacity, while biodiversity recovery and ecosystem condition remain incomplete outcomes.
Ministerio del Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible Paraguay
5% weight
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
What this category measures
Physical safety, usable justice, legal identity, reliable public administration and low needless institutional burden.
TBFC targetUsable justice, legal identity, safety and ordinary administration should remain accessible regardless of wealth. Access-gate research questionDo fees, legal costs, bail, fines, documentation costs or ability to hire expertise materially change access to justice, safety or public administration? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Pacorips Constitutional Foundations
+23.5↓
Score breakdown
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
The 2025 World Justice Project index places Paraguay 100th of 143 jurisdictions and records a 1.0% annual decline. This is used as evidence of meaningful institutional friction, not as a judgment about any individual political actor.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
The 2025 World Justice Project index places Paraguay 100th of 143 jurisdictions and records a 1.0% annual decline. This is used as evidence of meaningful institutional friction, not as a judgment about any individual political actor.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
The 2025 World Justice Project index places Paraguay 100th of 143 jurisdictions and records a 1.0% annual decline. This is used as evidence of meaningful institutional friction, not as a judgment about any individual political actor.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
The 2025 World Justice Project index places Paraguay 100th of 143 jurisdictions and records a 1.0% annual decline. This is used as evidence of meaningful institutional friction, not as a judgment about any individual political actor.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 15.00 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 6.00 = 23.50
Base: 23.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +23.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 23.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.34 points
This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +10.0
What the evidence found
The 2025 World Justice Project index places Paraguay 100th of 143 jurisdictions and records a 1.0% annual decline. This is used as evidence of meaningful institutional friction, not as a judgment about any individual political actor.
World Justice Project
4% weight
Durability, Repair & Material Return
What this category measures
Whether useful materials, infrastructure and goods are maintained, repairable, recovered and cycled instead of repeatedly becoming waste.
TBFC targetRepair, maintenance and useful material circulation should protect capability instead of forcing repeated repurchase as the default route to continued use. Access-gate research questionDo repair and maintenance remain practically accessible, or do pricing, proprietary restrictions and replacement incentives turn continued use into repeated purchasing? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Repair Is Sovereignty
+24.3↓
Score breakdown
Durability, Repair & Material Return
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
Paraguay has a national integrated urban solid-waste management plan and municipal planning guides, but the 2022 census found regular/public-private garbage collection at only 55.2% of occupied private dwellings. Policy capacity therefore remains ahead of universal material-return reach.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
Paraguay has a national integrated urban solid-waste management plan and municipal planning guides, but the 2022 census found regular/public-private garbage collection at only 55.2% of occupied private dwellings. Policy capacity therefore remains ahead of universal material-return reach.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Paraguay has a national integrated urban solid-waste management plan and municipal planning guides, but the 2022 census found regular/public-private garbage collection at only 55.2% of occupied private dwellings. Policy capacity therefore remains ahead of universal material-return reach.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Paraguay has a national integrated urban solid-waste management plan and municipal planning guides, but the 2022 census found regular/public-private garbage collection at only 55.2% of occupied private dwellings. Policy capacity therefore remains ahead of universal material-return reach.
This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 15.00 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 6.75 = 24.25
Base: 24.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +24.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 24.25 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.10 points
Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions
A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.
No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.
This category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +10.0
What the evidence found
Paraguay has a national integrated urban solid-waste management plan and municipal planning guides, but the 2022 census found regular/public-private garbage collection at only 55.2% of occupied private dwellings. Policy capacity therefore remains ahead of universal material-return reach.
Ministerio del Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible Paraguay
6% weight · research presentInternational Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending
The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.
Country findings and sources
Migration authorities recorded 47,687 residence applications and 40,600 residence grants in 2025. This demonstrates active settlement pathways, but access remains governed through legal residence procedures rather than unrestricted entry.
Dirección Nacional de Migraciones Paraguay
6% weight · research presentExternal Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending
The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.
Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions
A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.
No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.
Country findings and sources
Paraguay is deeply connected to regional and global trade through agricultural and other exports. This category records those outward material flows and environmental responsibilities factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology.
Banco Central del ParaguayTrott Bailey Family Civilization Target
The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping
Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.
This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.
and then 
