Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Lithuania 🇱🇹

Lithuania currently ranks #60 of 241 on the TBF Abundance Scorecard, scoring -58.05. This country is money-gated, strongest in Energy and weakest in External Footprint among 15 scored of 16 evidence categories.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Data updatedEvidence through 8 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-58.1
Evidence before Abundance Gate +42.8
How the headline score is calculated

Evidence before Gate = Σ (published category score × category weight × research coverage) ÷ Σ (category weight × research coverage). The five-part Money Gate sets a proportional ceiling, with Friction already in the category evidence score.

Current evidence: +42.8 · Money Gate: 3.50/20 · Cash-register lock: +82.5 · Graded pressure: +82.5 · Headline: -58.1.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#60of 241

Global standing based on life reachability

LithuaniaLast recorded move: up from #61 to #60.Recent recorded movements
  1. #61 → #6014 Oct 2026 · 17:32 GMT-0500
  2. #62 → #6113 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500
  3. #62 → #6113 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500
  4. #63 → #6213 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 20: rank 66. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 20: rank 67. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 20: rank 67. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 20: rank 68. 9 Oct 2026 · 07:51 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 20: rank 70. 9 Oct 2026 · 07:51 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 20: rank 66. 9 Oct 2026 · 12:04 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 20: rank 65. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 20: rank 64. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 20: rank 57. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 20: rank 56. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 20: rank 55. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 20: rank 56. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 20: rank 57. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 20: rank 56. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 20: rank 57. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 20: rank 64. 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 20: rank 63. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500 – 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 20: rank 62. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 20: rank 61. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500 – 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 20: rank 60. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:32 GMT-0500NOW #60Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

National Abundance Gate

Money-gated

Graded status · five basics not fully cleared

Research Coverage

91%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 78.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 76.0% = 90.58% weighted coverage

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored; 2 / 2 international categories with documented research (scores require full audit)

GDP Rank

#79

Shown for context, not as the abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

All five basics must reach 4/4 before a country can cross zero. Open any gate reading to see exactly why its points were assigned and review the source record.

Reach-to-Money-Gate Clearance 2.0: These five gates measure effective no-payment access, not installed capacity alone. Under new source-backed reviews, 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 points track verified free access to 0%, some but less than 30%, 30%+, 50%+, 75%+ and 100% of the population respectively. The higher levels require reliable real use; 4/4 requires universally accessible, reliable service without ordinary charges or exclusions. Missing population figures remain pending. Older gate points remain archived until re-audited.

0.5 / 4

Food

Why 0.5 / 4?

Ministry of Social Security and Labour documents free lunches for pre-primary and first/second-grade pupils regardless of family income, and targeted free meals for poorer families. This reaches enrolled children rather than all household food needs.

Earlier-method Money Gate finding. A measured, source-linked free-access population share is still required to score this gate using Reach-to-Clearance 2.0; this historical reading has not been silently changed.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-09
0.8 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 0.8 / 4?

The ministry operates means-tested municipal social housing and partial compensation for rent and acquisition; the housing and rental obligation remains payment mediated, not universal free land/housing.

Earlier-method Money Gate finding. A measured, source-linked free-access population share is still required to score this gate using Reach-to-Clearance 2.0; this historical reading has not been silently changed.

Point calculation

0.75 ÷ 4 × 100 = 18.75% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-09
2.0 / 4

Healthcare

Why 2.0 / 4?

Compulsory health insurance pays most contracted care for covered people without point-of-care fees, but contributions/insurance status, dental care, medications and other co-pays create continuing payment gates.

Earlier-method Money Gate finding. A measured, source-linked free-access population share is still required to score this gate using Reach-to-Clearance 2.0; this historical reading has not been silently changed.

Point calculation

2.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 50.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-09
0.3 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.3 / 4?

Vilnius JUDU lists ordinary 30- and 60-minute priced tickets, with concessionary rates. No national ordinary zero-fare mobility baseline is verified.

Earlier-method Money Gate finding. A measured, source-linked free-access population share is still required to score this gate using Reach-to-Clearance 2.0; this historical reading has not been silently changed.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-09
0.0 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 0.0 / 4?

ESO’s 2026 regulated residential electricity tariff and network charge schedules require payment; no nationwide household water-and-energy no-payment guarantee is demonstrated.

Earlier-method Money Gate finding. A measured, source-linked free-access population share is still required to score this gate using Reach-to-Clearance 2.0; this historical reading has not been silently changed.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-09
Money Gate score
  • Food0.5 / 4
  • Housing / Land0.8 / 4
  • Healthcare2.0 / 4
  • Transportation0.3 / 4
  • Water / Energy0.0 / 4
  • Money still needed16.5 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 3.5 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 0.50 + Housing / Land 0.75 + Healthcare 2.00 + Transportation 0.25 + Water / Energy 0.00 = 3.50 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Cash-Register Lock
82.5 / 100
Why 82.5 / 100?

The five direct Money Gate readings total 0–20. Every point removes five of the 100 payment-lock units; a 7/20 reading produces a 65/100 lock.

Actual calculation

100 - (3.50 × 5) = 82.50

Friction Economy Pressure
69.3 / 100
Why 69.3 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -38.60) ÷ 2 = 69.30 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-41.3
Why -41.3?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

82.50 = 82.50 (Friction already counted in category scores)

-50 + 2.5 × 3.50 = -41.3

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale once verified. International Welcome and External Footprint remain pending until their rail scores are properly researched. Select a category for sourced findings and transparent calculations.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
+35.8↓

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

+35.8
Capacity 25%
+80.0× 25%= +20.0 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

38.4 actual weekly working hours in the main job in 2025, among the longest in the EU. Time abundance is assessed through paid work, informal work, unpaid care, commuting and administrative burden rather than output or employment alone.

Reach 35%
+68.0× 35%= +23.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

38.4 actual weekly working hours in the main job in 2025, among the longest in the EU. Time abundance is assessed through paid work, informal work, unpaid care, commuting and administrative burden rather than output or employment alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-20.0× 25%= -5.0 points
Exact point calculation

-20.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -5.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

38.4 actual weekly working hours in the main job in 2025, among the longest in the EU. Time abundance is assessed through paid work, informal work, unpaid care, commuting and administrative burden rather than output or employment alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Regeneration 15%
-20.0× 15%= -3.0 points
Exact point calculation

-20.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

38.4 actual weekly working hours in the main job in 2025, among the longest in the EU. Time abundance is assessed through paid work, informal work, unpaid care, commuting and administrative burden rather than output or employment alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+35.8 Published category score+35.8 Contribution to national evidence score+2.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + -5.00 + -3.00 = 35.80

Base: 35.80 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 35.80 × (9.00 × 78.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 2.77 points

This category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 78% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.02%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Lithuania: Human Time & Burden Return research finding

38.4 actual weekly working hours in the main job in 2025, among the longest in the EU. Time abundance is assessed through paid work, informal work, unpaid care, commuting and administrative burden rather than output or employment alone.

Eurostat — Average work week 2025
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
+41.6↓

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

+41.6
Capacity 25%
+80.0× 25%= +20.0 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Housing-cost overburden in 2024 was about 4% in cities and 8% in rural areas; 18% could not keep homes adequately warm. Housing is judged on adequacy, affordability, resilience, security and ordinary household reach rather than construction volume alone.

Reach 35%
+68.0× 35%= +23.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.75/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Housing-cost overburden in 2024 was about 4% in cities and 8% in rural areas; 18% could not keep homes adequately warm. Housing is judged on adequacy, affordability, resilience, security and ordinary household reach rather than construction volume alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-45.0× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Housing-cost overburden in 2024 was about 4% in cities and 8% in rural areas; 18% could not keep homes adequately warm. Housing is judged on adequacy, affordability, resilience, security and ordinary household reach rather than construction volume alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Durability 15%
+60.0× 15%= +9.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Housing-cost overburden in 2024 was about 4% in cities and 8% in rural areas; 18% could not keep homes adequately warm. Housing is judged on adequacy, affordability, resilience, security and ordinary household reach rather than construction volume alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.6 Published category score+41.6 Contribution to national evidence score+3.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 41.55

Base: 41.55 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.55 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 3.67 points

This category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Lithuania: Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach research finding

Housing-cost overburden in 2024 was about 4% in cities and 8% in rural areas; 18% could not keep homes adequately warm. Housing is judged on adequacy, affordability, resilience, security and ordinary household reach rather than construction volume alone.

Eurostat — Housing in Europe 2025
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
+41.6↓

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

+41.6
Capacity 25%
+80.0× 25%= +20.0 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

25.8% were at risk of poverty or social exclusion in 2024; the worker audit kept current food affordability evidence separate from older protein-meal deprivation data. Food production and market supply are separated from household affordability, diet quality, nutrition security and dependable public/free nourishment routes.

Reach 35%
+68.0× 35%= +23.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

25.8% were at risk of poverty or social exclusion in 2024; the worker audit kept current food affordability evidence separate from older protein-meal deprivation data. Food production and market supply are separated from household affordability, diet quality, nutrition security and dependable public/free nourishment routes.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction / Waste 25%
-45.0× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

25.8% were at risk of poverty or social exclusion in 2024; the worker audit kept current food affordability evidence separate from older protein-meal deprivation data. Food production and market supply are separated from household affordability, diet quality, nutrition security and dependable public/free nourishment routes.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Multiplication 15%
+60.0× 15%= +9.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

25.8% were at risk of poverty or social exclusion in 2024; the worker audit kept current food affordability evidence separate from older protein-meal deprivation data. Food production and market supply are separated from household affordability, diet quality, nutrition security and dependable public/free nourishment routes.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.6 Published category score+41.6 Contribution to national evidence score+4.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 41.55

Base: 41.55 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.55 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 4.13 points

This category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Lithuania: Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance research finding

25.8% were at risk of poverty or social exclusion in 2024; the worker audit kept current food affordability evidence separate from older protein-meal deprivation data. Food production and market supply are separated from household affordability, diet quality, nutrition security and dependable public/free nourishment routes.

Eurostat — Poverty/social exclusion 2024
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
+41.6↓

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

+41.6
Capacity 25%
+80.0× 25%= +20.0 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

The worker audit found off-grid drinking-water and sanitation gaps alongside surface-water ecological pressure, despite broad network coverage. Water and sanitation are judged on safe household reach, continuity, quality, rural/urban distribution and affordability rather than infrastructure announcements alone.

Reach 35%
+68.0× 35%= +23.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The worker audit found off-grid drinking-water and sanitation gaps alongside surface-water ecological pressure, despite broad network coverage. Water and sanitation are judged on safe household reach, continuity, quality, rural/urban distribution and affordability rather than infrastructure announcements alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction / Loss 25%
-45.0× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The worker audit found off-grid drinking-water and sanitation gaps alongside surface-water ecological pressure, despite broad network coverage. Water and sanitation are judged on safe household reach, continuity, quality, rural/urban distribution and affordability rather than infrastructure announcements alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Regeneration 15%
+60.0× 15%= +9.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The worker audit found off-grid drinking-water and sanitation gaps alongside surface-water ecological pressure, despite broad network coverage. Water and sanitation are judged on safe household reach, continuity, quality, rural/urban distribution and affordability rather than infrastructure announcements alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.6 Published category score+41.6 Contribution to national evidence score+2.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 41.55

Base: 41.55 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.55 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 2.75 points

This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Lithuania: Water & Sanitation Abundance research finding

The worker audit found off-grid drinking-water and sanitation gaps alongside surface-water ecological pressure, despite broad network coverage. Water and sanitation are judged on safe household reach, continuity, quality, rural/urban distribution and affordability rather than infrastructure announcements alone.

European Commission — Water Wise EU: Lithuania
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
+54.3↓

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

+54.3
Capacity 25%
+90.0× 25%= +22.5 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Q2 2025 domestic electricity generation supplied more than 90% of demand and nearly three-quarters of local generation was renewable; continental synchronization completed in 2025. Energy is judged on connection, reliability, affordability and household capability rather than generation or export capacity alone.

Reach 35%
+80.0× 35%= +28.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

80.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 28.00 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Q2 2025 domestic electricity generation supplied more than 90% of demand and nearly three-quarters of local generation was renewable; continental synchronization completed in 2025. Energy is judged on connection, reliability, affordability and household capability rather than generation or export capacity alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-30.0× 25%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Q2 2025 domestic electricity generation supplied more than 90% of demand and nearly three-quarters of local generation was renewable; continental synchronization completed in 2025. Energy is judged on connection, reliability, affordability and household capability rather than generation or export capacity alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Burden Removed 15%
+75.0× 15%= +11.3 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Q2 2025 domestic electricity generation supplied more than 90% of demand and nearly three-quarters of local generation was renewable; continental synchronization completed in 2025. Energy is judged on connection, reliability, affordability and household capability rather than generation or export capacity alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+54.3 Published category score+54.3 Contribution to national evidence score+3.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 28.00 + -7.50 + 11.25 = 54.25

Base: 54.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +54.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 54.25 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 2.99 points

This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Lithuania: Energy & Household Capability research finding

Q2 2025 domestic electricity generation supplied more than 90% of demand and nearly three-quarters of local generation was renewable; continental synchronization completed in 2025. Energy is judged on connection, reliability, affordability and household capability rather than generation or export capacity alone.

Lithuania Ministry of Energy — Q2 2025 electricity review
7% weight Health & Care Reach
+41.6↓

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

+41.6
Capacity 25%
+80.0× 25%= +20.0 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

The 2026 country review records high life expectancy alongside elevated out-of-pocket spending and geographic workforce shortages that still constrain access. Health abundance is judged on actual care reach, financial protection, geographic access and service reliability rather than legal entitlement alone.

Reach 35%
+68.0× 35%= +23.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 2.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2026 country review records high life expectancy alongside elevated out-of-pocket spending and geographic workforce shortages that still constrain access. Health abundance is judged on actual care reach, financial protection, geographic access and service reliability rather than legal entitlement alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-45.0× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2026 country review records high life expectancy alongside elevated out-of-pocket spending and geographic workforce shortages that still constrain access. Health abundance is judged on actual care reach, financial protection, geographic access and service reliability rather than legal entitlement alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Prevention 15%
+60.0× 15%= +9.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2026 country review records high life expectancy alongside elevated out-of-pocket spending and geographic workforce shortages that still constrain access. Health abundance is judged on actual care reach, financial protection, geographic access and service reliability rather than legal entitlement alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.6 Published category score+41.6 Contribution to national evidence score+3.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 41.55

Base: 41.55 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.55 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 3.21 points

This category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Lithuania: Health & Care Reach research finding

The 2026 country review records high life expectancy alongside elevated out-of-pocket spending and geographic workforce shortages that still constrain access. Health abundance is judged on actual care reach, financial protection, geographic access and service reliability rather than legal entitlement alone.

European Commission — 2026 Country Report: Lithuania
6% weight Education & Human Capability
+54.3↓

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

+54.3
Capacity 25%
+90.0× 25%= +22.5 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Pre-primary participation reached 97.9% in 2024; the worker audit kept broader learning-outcome questions open rather than inferring them from participation. Education is judged on real learning, access, completion, inclusion and human capability rather than enrolment alone.

Reach 35%
+80.0× 35%= +28.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

80.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 28.00 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Pre-primary participation reached 97.9% in 2024; the worker audit kept broader learning-outcome questions open rather than inferring them from participation. Education is judged on real learning, access, completion, inclusion and human capability rather than enrolment alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-30.0× 25%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Pre-primary participation reached 97.9% in 2024; the worker audit kept broader learning-outcome questions open rather than inferring them from participation. Education is judged on real learning, access, completion, inclusion and human capability rather than enrolment alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Capability 15%
+75.0× 15%= +11.3 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Pre-primary participation reached 97.9% in 2024; the worker audit kept broader learning-outcome questions open rather than inferring them from participation. Education is judged on real learning, access, completion, inclusion and human capability rather than enrolment alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+54.3 Published category score+54.3 Contribution to national evidence score+3.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 28.00 + -7.50 + 11.25 = 54.25

Base: 54.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +54.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 54.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 3.59 points

This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Lithuania: Education & Human Capability research finding

Pre-primary participation reached 97.9% in 2024; the worker audit kept broader learning-outcome questions open rather than inferring them from participation. Education is judged on real learning, access, completion, inclusion and human capability rather than enrolment alone.

Eurostat — Pre-primary education 2024
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
+41.6↓

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

+41.6
Capacity 25%
+80.0× 25%= +20.0 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Remote-area public transport remains weaker and the worker audit retained road-injury evidence as a material reach/safety friction. Mobility is judged on safe, affordable reach to daily life, public transport, roads and geographic inclusion rather than infrastructure length alone.

Reach 35%
+68.0× 35%= +23.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Remote-area public transport remains weaker and the worker audit retained road-injury evidence as a material reach/safety friction. Mobility is judged on safe, affordable reach to daily life, public transport, roads and geographic inclusion rather than infrastructure length alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-45.0× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Remote-area public transport remains weaker and the worker audit retained road-injury evidence as a material reach/safety friction. Mobility is judged on safe, affordable reach to daily life, public transport, roads and geographic inclusion rather than infrastructure length alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Time 15%
+60.0× 15%= +9.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Remote-area public transport remains weaker and the worker audit retained road-injury evidence as a material reach/safety friction. Mobility is judged on safe, affordable reach to daily life, public transport, roads and geographic inclusion rather than infrastructure length alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.6 Published category score+41.6 Contribution to national evidence score+1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 41.55

Base: 41.55 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.55 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 1.83 points

This category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Lithuania: Mobility & Reachability research finding

Remote-area public transport remains weaker and the worker audit retained road-injury evidence as a material reach/safety friction. Mobility is judged on safe, affordable reach to daily life, public transport, roads and geographic inclusion rather than infrastructure length alone.

European Commission — 2026 Country Report: Lithuania
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
+41.6↓

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

+41.6
Capacity 25%
+80.0× 25%= +20.0 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

A childcare compensatory benefit was implemented in 2025, but early take-up evidence shows targeted rather than universal reach. Family stability is judged on whether housing, care, income, childcare and public systems reduce burdens on family formation and child continuity.

Reach 35%
+68.0× 35%= +23.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

A childcare compensatory benefit was implemented in 2025, but early take-up evidence shows targeted rather than universal reach. Family stability is judged on whether housing, care, income, childcare and public systems reduce burdens on family formation and child continuity.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-45.0× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

A childcare compensatory benefit was implemented in 2025, but early take-up evidence shows targeted rather than universal reach. Family stability is judged on whether housing, care, income, childcare and public systems reduce burdens on family formation and child continuity.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Continuity 15%
+60.0× 15%= +9.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

A childcare compensatory benefit was implemented in 2025, but early take-up evidence shows targeted rather than universal reach. Family stability is judged on whether housing, care, income, childcare and public systems reduce burdens on family formation and child continuity.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.6 Published category score+41.6 Contribution to national evidence score+3.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 41.55

Base: 41.55 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.55 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 3.67 points

This category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +41.6

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: +41.6 − 0 = +41.6 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Lithuania: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded in the cited legal-status review as of 2026-10-09. Constitution Article 38 refers to the free consent of a man and a woman. Partnership developments do not by themselves change the marriage law. This is a legal-classification reading only; it does not prove demographic causation.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 1992-10-25 · Reviewed: 2026-10-09

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Lithuania: Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability research finding

A childcare compensatory benefit was implemented in 2025, but early take-up evidence shows targeted rather than universal reach. Family stability is judged on whether housing, care, income, childcare and public systems reduce burdens on family formation and child continuity.

Lithuania Ministry of Social Security and Labour — Childcare compensatory benefit
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
+49.3↓

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

+49.3
Capacity 25%
+85.0× 25%= +21.3 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Extensive agricultural, rural and forest land exists, but the worker audit did not infer household land access or tenure freedom without a fresh nationwide measure. Land abundance is judged on practical access, tenure, productive/open space and the ability of ordinary households to use space without prohibitive financial barriers.

Reach 35%
+75.0× 35%= +26.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Recorded value matches a new ladder step. Full new-method status requires a source-led audit of the coverage and access conditions; the number alone is not proof.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.75/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Extensive agricultural, rural and forest land exists, but the worker audit did not infer household land access or tenure freedom without a fresh nationwide measure. Land abundance is judged on practical access, tenure, productive/open space and the ability of ordinary households to use space without prohibitive financial barriers.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction / Concentration 25%
-35.0× 25%= -8.8 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Extensive agricultural, rural and forest land exists, but the worker audit did not infer household land access or tenure freedom without a fresh nationwide measure. Land abundance is judged on practical access, tenure, productive/open space and the ability of ordinary households to use space without prohibitive financial barriers.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Productive Ground 15%
+70.0× 15%= +10.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Extensive agricultural, rural and forest land exists, but the worker audit did not infer household land access or tenure freedom without a fresh nationwide measure. Land abundance is judged on practical access, tenure, productive/open space and the ability of ordinary households to use space without prohibitive financial barriers.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+49.3 Published category score+49.3 Contribution to national evidence score+2.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 26.25 + -8.75 + 10.50 = 49.25

Base: 49.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +49.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 49.25 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 2.72 points

This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Lithuania: Land Access & Spatial Freedom research finding

Extensive agricultural, rural and forest land exists, but the worker audit did not infer household land access or tenure freedom without a fresh nationwide measure. Land abundance is judged on practical access, tenure, productive/open space and the ability of ordinary households to use space without prohibitive financial barriers.

Lithuania Ministry of Environment — Biodiversity goals
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
+49.3↓

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

+49.3
Capacity 25%
+85.0× 25%= +21.3 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Forests, lakes, rivers and the Baltic coast create strong physical capacity for restoration and public life while winter and regional-security pressures remain contradictory context. This category considers safety, environmental quality, public space, cultural/natural beauty and whether daily life leaves room for restoration and delight.

Reach 35%
+75.0× 35%= +26.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Forests, lakes, rivers and the Baltic coast create strong physical capacity for restoration and public life while winter and regional-security pressures remain contradictory context. This category considers safety, environmental quality, public space, cultural/natural beauty and whether daily life leaves room for restoration and delight.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-35.0× 25%= -8.8 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Forests, lakes, rivers and the Baltic coast create strong physical capacity for restoration and public life while winter and regional-security pressures remain contradictory context. This category considers safety, environmental quality, public space, cultural/natural beauty and whether daily life leaves room for restoration and delight.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Delight 15%
+70.0× 15%= +10.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Forests, lakes, rivers and the Baltic coast create strong physical capacity for restoration and public life while winter and regional-security pressures remain contradictory context. This category considers safety, environmental quality, public space, cultural/natural beauty and whether daily life leaves room for restoration and delight.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+49.3 Published category score+49.3 Contribution to national evidence score+3.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 26.25 + -8.75 + 10.50 = 49.25

Base: 49.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +49.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 49.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 3.26 points

This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Lithuania: Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight research finding

Forests, lakes, rivers and the Baltic coast create strong physical capacity for restoration and public life while winter and regional-security pressures remain contradictory context. This category considers safety, environmental quality, public space, cultural/natural beauty and whether daily life leaves room for restoration and delight.

Lithuania Ministry of Environment — Biodiversity goals
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
+49.3↓

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

+49.3
Capacity 25%
+85.0× 25%= +21.3 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

A national nature-restoration plan is being prepared and biodiversity commitments are substantial, but policy targets are not treated as completed restoration. Living ground is judged on biodiversity, ecological condition, climate resilience, water/soil systems and demonstrated restoration rather than plans alone.

Reach / Ecological Function 35%
+75.0× 35%= +26.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

A national nature-restoration plan is being prepared and biodiversity commitments are substantial, but policy targets are not treated as completed restoration. Living ground is judged on biodiversity, ecological condition, climate resilience, water/soil systems and demonstrated restoration rather than plans alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction / Loss 25%
-35.0× 25%= -8.8 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

A national nature-restoration plan is being prepared and biodiversity commitments are substantial, but policy targets are not treated as completed restoration. Living ground is judged on biodiversity, ecological condition, climate resilience, water/soil systems and demonstrated restoration rather than plans alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Regeneration 15%
+70.0× 15%= +10.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

A national nature-restoration plan is being prepared and biodiversity commitments are substantial, but policy targets are not treated as completed restoration. Living ground is judged on biodiversity, ecological condition, climate resilience, water/soil systems and demonstrated restoration rather than plans alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+49.3 Published category score+49.3 Contribution to national evidence score+3.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 26.25 + -8.75 + 10.50 = 49.25

Base: 49.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +49.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 49.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 3.26 points

This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Lithuania: Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience research finding

A national nature-restoration plan is being prepared and biodiversity commitments are substantial, but policy targets are not treated as completed restoration. Living ground is judged on biodiversity, ecological condition, climate resilience, water/soil systems and demonstrated restoration rather than plans alone.

European Commission — Water Wise EU: Lithuania
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
+41.6↓

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

+41.6
Capacity 25%
+80.0× 25%= +20.0 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

The worker audit did not secure a complete fresh national crime table and therefore retained road safety and regional-risk evidence without making a blanket safety claim. Justice is judged on safety, legal access, administrative friction, accessibility and whether ordinary people can resolve problems without prohibitive cost or delay.

Reach 35%
+68.0× 35%= +23.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The worker audit did not secure a complete fresh national crime table and therefore retained road safety and regional-risk evidence without making a blanket safety claim. Justice is judged on safety, legal access, administrative friction, accessibility and whether ordinary people can resolve problems without prohibitive cost or delay.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-45.0× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The worker audit did not secure a complete fresh national crime table and therefore retained road safety and regional-risk evidence without making a blanket safety claim. Justice is judged on safety, legal access, administrative friction, accessibility and whether ordinary people can resolve problems without prohibitive cost or delay.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Reliability 15%
+60.0× 15%= +9.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The worker audit did not secure a complete fresh national crime table and therefore retained road safety and regional-risk evidence without making a blanket safety claim. Justice is judged on safety, legal access, administrative friction, accessibility and whether ordinary people can resolve problems without prohibitive cost or delay.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.6 Published category score+41.6 Contribution to national evidence score+2.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 41.55

Base: 41.55 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.55 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 2.29 points

This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Lithuania: Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction research finding

The worker audit did not secure a complete fresh national crime table and therefore retained road safety and regional-risk evidence without making a blanket safety claim. Justice is judged on safety, legal access, administrative friction, accessibility and whether ordinary people can resolve problems without prohibitive cost or delay.

Lithuanian Police — 2025 road safety
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
+49.3↓

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

+49.3
Capacity 25%
+85.0× 25%= +21.3 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Separate bio-waste requirements began in 2024 and recycling infrastructure funding is active; a complete current national material-recovery ledger remains open. Durability is judged on repair, reuse, waste collection, recycling/material return and whether circular systems actually reach daily life.

Reach 35%
+75.0× 35%= +26.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Separate bio-waste requirements began in 2024 and recycling infrastructure funding is active; a complete current national material-recovery ledger remains open. Durability is judged on repair, reuse, waste collection, recycling/material return and whether circular systems actually reach daily life.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction / Waste 25%
-35.0× 25%= -8.8 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Separate bio-waste requirements began in 2024 and recycling infrastructure funding is active; a complete current national material-recovery ledger remains open. Durability is judged on repair, reuse, waste collection, recycling/material return and whether circular systems actually reach daily life.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Circularity 15%
+70.0× 15%= +10.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Separate bio-waste requirements began in 2024 and recycling infrastructure funding is active; a complete current national material-recovery ledger remains open. Durability is judged on repair, reuse, waste collection, recycling/material return and whether circular systems actually reach daily life.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+49.3 Published category score+49.3 Contribution to national evidence score+2.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 26.25 + -8.75 + 10.50 = 49.25

Base: 49.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +49.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 49.25 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 2.17 points

This category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Lithuania: Durability, Repair & Material Return research finding

Separate bio-waste requirements began in 2024 and recycling infrastructure funding is active; a complete current national material-recovery ledger remains open. Durability is judged on repair, reuse, waste collection, recycling/material return and whether circular systems actually reach daily life.

Lithuania Ministry of Environment — Separate food-waste sorting
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
+9.3↓

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

+9.3
Positive Contribution 25%
+45.0× 25%= +11.3 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Lithuania’s CPVA reports 2026 development-cooperation financing and tangible Create Ukraine placements, with ten returning specialists completing a programme in Ukrainian ministries. These are documented transnational projects, not a complete independent assessment of recipient benefit, environmental cost or reparative practice.

Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
+40.0× 25%= +10.0 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 10.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Lithuania’s CPVA reports 2026 development-cooperation financing and tangible Create Ukraine placements, with ten returning specialists completing a programme in Ukrainian ministries. These are documented transnational projects, not a complete independent assessment of recipient benefit, environmental cost or reparative practice.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
0.0× 35%= 0.0 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Lithuania’s CPVA reports 2026 development-cooperation financing and tangible Create Ukraine placements, with ten returning specialists completing a programme in Ukrainian ministries. These are documented transnational projects, not a complete independent assessment of recipient benefit, environmental cost or reparative practice.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Accountability / Repair 15%
-40.0× 15%= -6.0 points
Exact point calculation

-40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Lithuania’s CPVA reports 2026 development-cooperation financing and tangible Create Ukraine placements, with ten returning specialists completing a programme in Ukrainian ministries. These are documented transnational projects, not a complete independent assessment of recipient benefit, environmental cost or reparative practice.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+15.3 Published research adjustment-6.0 Published category score+9.3 Contribution to national evidence score+0.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 11.25 + 10.00 + 0.00 + -6.00 = 15.25

Base: 9.25 · reviewed adjustment: -6.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +9.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 9.25 × (6.00 × 76.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 0.47 points

Material transfers: scored in International Footprint

Exporter responsibility: -25.00/100 (15% of footprint); importer responsibility: -55.00/100 (15% of footprint). Material movement is a real workload; these are TBF authored judgments, not certified illegal dumping estimates. Each role is included ONCE in the Footprint 3.1 published score.

Exported waste / garbageRole: -25.00/100 · scored
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingRole: -25.00/100 · scored
Accepted imported garbageRole: -55.00/100 · scored
Accepted low-utility dumpingRole: -55.00/100 · scored

The material-transfer burden already affects the published score. Facility-specific downstream harm remains a separate research claim. No second penalty is added for the same trade.

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Method 3.1.6: weights 25/25/20/30, exporter/importer each 15%. New provisional authored rails 1-3 based on source https://cpva.lt/en/news/create-ukraine-first-wave-of-the-lithuania-initiated-programme-completed; Exporter: 16,321,900 kg of plastic scrap recorded as national total in 2024. Importer: 103,271,000 kg of plastic scrap recorded as national total in 2024. HS3915 sources: https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/LTU/year/2024/tradeflow/Exports/partner/ALL/product/3915 | https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/LTU/year/2024/tradeflow/Imports/partner/ALL/product/3915. These do not prove illegal dumping or total garbage volumes.

This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 76% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.56%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

Lithuania — External Footprint: mutual outcomes and incomplete checks

Lithuania’s CPVA reports 2026 development-cooperation financing and tangible Create Ukraine placements, with ten returning specialists completing a programme in Ukrainian ministries. These are documented transnational projects, not a complete independent assessment of recipient benefit, environmental cost or reparative practice.

2026-10-09 CPVA Lithuania — Create Ukraine first cohort result, Dec 2025 · CPVA Lithuania — 2026 aid programme allocated funding
6% weight · research presentInternational Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending

The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.

Country findings and sources

Lithuania — International Welcome: entry, visas and residency

Lithuania follows EU/Schengen short-stay visa-exemption and visa-required passport lists; this entry route must not be confused with Lithuanian digital residence permits or an unrestricted eVisa. The current audit can document the common Schengen rules, while local residence, asylum and citizenship-by-birth pathways require individual source confirmation.

2026-10-09 European Union — visa exemption Regulation 2018/1806 · EU Home Affairs — EES short-stay border rules 2026

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.