Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Tokelau 🇹🇰

Tokelau currently ranks #2 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -45.50. This territory is money-gated (7.75/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Land and weakest in Transport across 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Tracking baselineHistorical tracking baseline
TBF Abundance Score
-45.5
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: +57.1 · Money Gate: 7.75/20 · Headline: -45.5.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#2of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

TokelauLast recorded move: up from #3 to #2.Recent recorded movements
  1. #241 → #24020 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500
  2. #2 → #24120 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500
  3. #2 → #24120 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500
  4. #1 → #111 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500
View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

100%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% = 100.00% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

—

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

1.0 / 4

Food

Why 1.0 / 4?

Evidence supports 1.0/4: real public/community or productive-food capacity is credited, but ordinary nutritious food is not nationally reachable without payment.

Point calculation

1.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 25.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
2.0 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 2.0 / 4?

Evidence supports 2.0/4: public/non-market or tenure routes receive partial credit where real, but ordinary family shelter or productive land is not universally zero-payment.

Point calculation

2.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 50.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
2.5 / 4

Healthcare

Why 2.5 / 4?

Evidence supports 2.5/4: public or zero-payment health reach is credited where verified; eligibility, dental/medicine/specialist costs, distance or insurance prevent a full 4/4 unless the standard is truly universal.

Point calculation

2.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 62.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
0.3 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.3 / 4?

Evidence supports 0.25/4: free/subsidized routes receive credit, but ordinary mobility is not universally zero-fare and frictionless.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
2.0 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 2.0 / 4?

Evidence supports 2.0/4: public capacity/subsidy is credited, while household water and essential energy remain payment-, geography- or reliability-gated.

Point calculation

2.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 50.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
Money Gate score
  • Food1.0 / 4
  • Housing / Land2.0 / 4
  • Healthcare2.5 / 4
  • Transportation0.3 / 4
  • Water / Energy2.0 / 4
  • Money still needed12.3 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 7.8 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 1.00 + Housing / Land 2.00 + Healthcare 2.50 + Transportation 0.25 + Water / Energy 2.00 = 7.75 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
31.7 / 100
Why 31.7 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - 36.67) ÷ 2 = 31.67 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-30.6
Why -30.6?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 7.75 = -30.6

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-47.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +52.6

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-47.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-43.1× 25%= -10.8 points
Exact point calculation

64.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.00 weighted points

Original evidence +64.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +64.0; Money-gated reading -43.1 × 25% = -10.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Tokelau, village councils administer local services; this is organizational capacity, not a measured time saving.

For Tokelau, village/community systems, customary sharing and New Zealand-supported public services reduce several household paywalls, but imported food/materials and rare sea transport still require money and create strong logistical friction.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-45.2× 35%= -15.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

58.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 20.30 weighted points

Original evidence +58.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +58.0; Money-gated reading -45.2 × 35% = -15.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

New Zealand supports essential Tokelau services in health, education, transport and communications; household participation is not quantified.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-55.6× 25%= -13.9 points
Exact point calculation

28.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 7.00 weighted points

Original evidence +28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +28.0; Money-gated reading -55.6 × 25% = -13.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, income and employment are reported in the older 2016 household survey; no modern time-use diary is supplied.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-43.8× 15%= -6.6 points
Exact point calculation

62.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.30 weighted points

Original evidence +62.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +62.0; Money-gated reading -43.8 × 15% = -6.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

UN Women reports major gaps in unpaid domestic work and gender data for Tokelau.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.78 + -15.82 + -13.90 + -6.57 = -47.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +52.6. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +52.6. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -47.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+52.6 Original evidence category score+52.6 Contribution to national evidence score+4.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 16.00 + 20.30 + 7.00 + 9.30 = 52.60

Base: 52.60 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +52.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 52.60 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 4.73 points

For Tokelau, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — human-time-burden — beleshky 4

UN Women reports major gaps in unpaid domestic work and gender data for Tokelau.

UN Women Tokelau gender data profile
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — human-time-burden — beleshky 3

For Tokelau, income and employment are reported in the older 2016 household survey; no modern time-use diary is supplied.

United Nations 2025 Tokelau working paper
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — human-time-burden — beleshky 2

New Zealand supports essential Tokelau services in health, education, transport and communications; household participation is not quantified.

New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade
Human Time & Burden Return

For Tokelau, village/community systems, customary sharing and New Zealand-supported public services reduce several household paywalls, but imported food/materials and rare sea transport still require money and create strong logistical friction.

Tokelau Government / National Statistics Office
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-42.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +66.7

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-42.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-38.3× 25%= -9.6 points
Exact point calculation

78.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 19.50 weighted points

Original evidence +78.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +78.0; Money-gated reading -38.3 × 25% = -9.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Tokelau, customary land is held across generations by families, and some land is held in common.

For Tokelau, customary communal land and family/village tenure provide unusually strong non-market housing and land continuity, although modern construction materials remain imported and paid.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-41.0× 35%= -14.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 2.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -41.0 × 35% = -14.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Tokelau, customary land is held under village custom and overseen by Taupulega.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-48.0× 25%= -12.0 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 12.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -48.0 × 25% = -12.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, the 2016 household survey included imputed rent in incomes; it is not a current rent affordability survey.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-41.7× 15%= -6.3 points
Exact point calculation

68.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.20 weighted points

Original evidence +68.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +68.0; Money-gated reading -41.7 × 15% = -6.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, narrow low-lying atolls face cyclone damage and climate threats to housing.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -9.57 + -14.36 + -11.99 + -6.26 = -42.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +66.7. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +66.7. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -42.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+66.7 Original evidence category score+66.7 Contribution to national evidence score+5.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 19.50 + 24.50 + 12.50 + 10.20 = 66.70

Base: 66.70 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +66.7 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 66.70 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 5.34 points

For Tokelau, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes +5.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +8.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — housing-shelter-reach — beleshky 4

For Tokelau, narrow low-lying atolls face cyclone damage and climate threats to housing.

Tokelau Government: Land and geography
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — housing-shelter-reach — beleshky 3

For Tokelau, the 2016 household survey included imputed rent in incomes; it is not a current rent affordability survey.

United Nations 2025 Tokelau working paper
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — housing-shelter-reach — beleshky 2

For Tokelau, customary land is held under village custom and overseen by Taupulega.

Government of Tokelau: Constitution
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — housing-shelter-reach — beleshky 1

For Tokelau, customary land is held across generations by families, and some land is held in common.

Tokelau Government: Land and geography
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

For Tokelau, customary communal land and family/village tenure provide unusually strong non-market housing and land continuity, although modern construction materials remain imported and paid.

Tokelau Government / National Statistics Office
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-53.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +34.9

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-53.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-46.6× 25%= -11.7 points
Exact point calculation

54.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.50 weighted points

Original evidence +54.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +54.0; Money-gated reading -46.6 × 25% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Tokelau, traditional fishing provides marine food; large or designated catches can be shared through inati.

Tokelau has functioning food retail and public/social support routes, but ordinary nutritious food remains predominantly purchased; imports or transport logistics add price exposure and no universal zero-money food system was verified.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-50.1× 35%= -17.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 1.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

44.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.40 weighted points

Original evidence +44.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +44.0; Money-gated reading -50.1 × 35% = -17.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Tokelau, pacific Community documents community fish distribution, but the inati system applies to particular catches and circumstances.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-67.0× 25%= -16.8 points
Exact point calculation

-5.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -1.25 weighted points

Original evidence -5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -5.0; Money-gated reading -67.0 × 25% = -16.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, limited agricultural capacity means local production covers only basic needs and imports remain important.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-48.7× 15%= -7.3 points
Exact point calculation

48.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.20 weighted points

Original evidence +48.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +48.0; Money-gated reading -48.7 × 15% = -7.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, coral bleaching and changing conditions affect fish supply near the shore.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.65 + -17.52 + -16.76 + -7.30 = -53.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +34.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +34.9. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -53.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+34.9 Original evidence category score+34.9 Contribution to national evidence score+3.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.50 + 15.40 + -1.25 + 7.20 = 34.85

Base: 34.85 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +34.9 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 34.85 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 3.14 points

For Tokelau, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — food-nourishment-free-food — beleshky 3

For Tokelau, limited agricultural capacity means local production covers only basic needs and imports remain important.

New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — food-nourishment-free-food — beleshky 2

For Tokelau, pacific Community documents community fish distribution, but the inati system applies to particular catches and circumstances.

Pacific Community: traditional marine management
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — food-nourishment-free-food — beleshky 1

For Tokelau, traditional fishing provides marine food; large or designated catches can be shared through inati.

Atafu Tokelau Community Group: fishing and inati
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

Tokelau has functioning food retail and public/social support routes, but ordinary nutritious food remains predominantly purchased; imports or transport logistics add price exposure and no universal zero-money food system was verified.

Tokelau Government / National Statistics Office
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-45.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence +57.4

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-45.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-40.3× 25%= -10.1 points
Exact point calculation

72.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.00 weighted points

Original evidence +72.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +72.0; Money-gated reading -40.3 × 25% = -10.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Tokelau, water and sanitation are identified as national infrastructure priorities.

For Tokelau, rainwater harvesting and public/community systems serve small atoll populations; drought and climate vulnerability remain major risks despite low direct market dependence.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-42.4× 35%= -14.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 2.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

66.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.10 weighted points

Original evidence +66.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +66.0; Money-gated reading -42.4 × 35% = -14.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Long dry periods put pressure on Tokelau water storage; household safe-water coverage is not established here.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-55.6× 25%= -13.9 points
Exact point calculation

28.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 7.00 weighted points

Original evidence +28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +28.0; Money-gated reading -55.6 × 25% = -13.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, pollution of the freshwater lens and coastal waters is a documented environmental concern.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-43.8× 15%= -6.6 points
Exact point calculation

62.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.30 weighted points

Original evidence +62.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +62.0; Money-gated reading -43.8 × 15% = -6.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, village waste and water actions are discussed, but measured water reuse or regeneration is not supplied.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.09 + -14.85 + -13.90 + -6.57 = -45.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +57.4. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +57.4. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -45.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+57.4 Original evidence category score+57.4 Contribution to national evidence score+3.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.00 + 23.10 + 7.00 + 9.30 = 57.40

Base: 57.40 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +57.4 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 57.40 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 3.44 points

For Tokelau, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — water-sanitation — beleshky 1

For Tokelau, water and sanitation are identified as national infrastructure priorities.

Government of Tokelau: Strategic Plan
Water & Sanitation Abundance

For Tokelau, rainwater harvesting and public/community systems serve small atoll populations; drought and climate vulnerability remain major risks despite low direct market dependence.

Tokelau Government / National Statistics Office
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-39.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence +75.8

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-39.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-36.2× 25%= -9.0 points
Exact point calculation

84.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points

Original evidence +84.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +84.0; Money-gated reading -36.2 × 25% = -9.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Tokelau, solar photovoltaic systems were commissioned on all three atolls from 2012, creating a large renewable supply base.

Essential electricity and household energy capacity is broadly available in Tokelau, but recurring bills, imported fuel or generation costs keep energy behind a cash gate despite public support and renewable investment.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-37.6× 35%= -13.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 2.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

80.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 28.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -37.6 × 35% = -13.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Tokelau, solar supplies electricity to villages; the UN notes electricity demand subsequently rose beyond previous generation capacity.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-45.2× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

58.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 14.50 weighted points

Original evidence +58.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +58.0; Money-gated reading -45.2 × 25% = -11.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, renewable upgrades were aimed at 90% generation for at least ten years, but 2025 completion was forecast, not proven in the 2025 report.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-36.9× 15%= -5.5 points
Exact point calculation

82.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 12.30 weighted points

Original evidence +82.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +82.0; Money-gated reading -36.9 × 15% = -5.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, new Zealand supports the territory’s service infrastructure; actual family hours and expenses removed were not measured.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -9.04 + -13.15 + -11.30 + -5.53 = -39.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +75.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +75.8. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -39.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+75.8 Original evidence category score+75.8 Contribution to national evidence score+3.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.00 + 28.00 + 14.50 + 12.30 = 75.80

Base: 75.80 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +75.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 75.80 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 3.79 points

For Tokelau, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +4.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — energy-household-capability — beleshky 4

For Tokelau, new Zealand supports the territory’s service infrastructure; actual family hours and expenses removed were not measured.

New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — energy-household-capability — beleshky 3

For Tokelau, renewable upgrades were aimed at 90% generation for at least ten years, but 2025 completion was forecast, not proven in the 2025 report.

United Nations 2025 Tokelau working paper
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — energy-household-capability — beleshky 2

For Tokelau, solar supplies electricity to villages; the UN notes electricity demand subsequently rose beyond previous generation capacity.

United Nations 2025 Tokelau working paper
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — energy-household-capability — beleshky 1

For Tokelau, solar photovoltaic systems were commissioned on all three atolls from 2012, creating a large renewable supply base.

United Nations 2025 Tokelau working paper
Energy & Household Capability

Essential electricity and household energy capacity is broadly available in Tokelau, but recurring bills, imported fuel or generation costs keep energy behind a cash gate despite public support and renewable investment.

Tokelau Government / National Statistics Office
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-41.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence +70.1

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-41.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-36.9× 25%= -9.2 points
Exact point calculation

82.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.50 weighted points

Original evidence +82.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +82.0; Money-gated reading -36.9 × 25% = -9.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Tokelau has supported local clinical services and external patient-referral arrangements.

For Tokelau, public health services provide local primary care without a large insurance market, while serious cases require difficult evacuation to Samoa/New Zealand.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-39.0× 35%= -13.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 2.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

76.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.60 weighted points

Original evidence +76.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +76.0; Money-gated reading -39.0 × 35% = -13.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Tokelau, antenatal and child immunization coverage was reported as 100%; period and all-health reach are not equivalent.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-48.0× 25%= -12.0 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 12.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -48.0 × 25% = -12.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, a prior independent review reported dysfunction, strained coordination and delays in referrals.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-41.0× 15%= -6.2 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -41.0 × 15% = -6.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, early referral of pregnant women to Samoa or New Zealand is associated with reported low infant and maternal mortality.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -9.22 + -13.63 + -11.99 + -6.16 = -41.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +70.1. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +70.1. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -41.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+70.1 Original evidence category score+70.1 Contribution to national evidence score+4.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.50 + 26.60 + 12.50 + 10.50 = 70.10

Base: 70.10 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +70.1 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 70.10 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 4.91 points

For Tokelau, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — health-care-reach — beleshky 4

For Tokelau, early referral of pregnant women to Samoa or New Zealand is associated with reported low infant and maternal mortality.

United Nations 2025 Tokelau working paper
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — health-care-reach — beleshky 3

For Tokelau, a prior independent review reported dysfunction, strained coordination and delays in referrals.

United Nations 2025 Tokelau working paper
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — health-care-reach — beleshky 2

For Tokelau, antenatal and child immunization coverage was reported as 100%; period and all-health reach are not equivalent.

United Nations 2025 Tokelau working paper
Health & Care Reach

For Tokelau, public health services provide local primary care without a large insurance market, while serious cases require difficult evacuation to Samoa/New Zealand.

Tokelau Government / National Statistics Office
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-39.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +74.0

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-39.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-36.2× 25%= -9.0 points
Exact point calculation

84.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points

Original evidence +84.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +84.0; Money-gated reading -36.2 × 25% = -9.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Tokelau, early childhood and school education are free through Year 13, with a school on each atoll.

Publicly financed schooling gives Tokelau strong foundational education reach, while tertiary study, specialist training, supplies, travel or enrichment still create household costs.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-37.6× 35%= -13.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

80.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 28.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -37.6 × 35% = -13.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Tokelau, free schooling covers early childhood through Year 13, but tertiary pathways require different provision.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-45.2× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

58.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 14.50 weighted points

Original evidence +58.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +58.0; Money-gated reading -45.2 × 25% = -11.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, new Zealand-supported reviews reported improvements at early levels but continuing weaknesses in secondary education quality.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-41.0× 15%= -6.2 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -41.0 × 15% = -6.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Tokelauan students can apply for New Zealand scholarships and regional training.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -9.04 + -13.15 + -11.30 + -6.16 = -39.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +74.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +74.0. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -39.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+74.0 Original evidence category score+74.0 Contribution to national evidence score+4.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.00 + 28.00 + 14.50 + 10.50 = 74.00

Base: 74.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +74.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 74.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 4.44 points

For Tokelau, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +4.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — education-human-capability — beleshky 3

For Tokelau, new Zealand-supported reviews reported improvements at early levels but continuing weaknesses in secondary education quality.

United Nations 2025 Tokelau working paper
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — education-human-capability — beleshky 2

For Tokelau, free schooling covers early childhood through Year 13, but tertiary pathways require different provision.

United Nations 2025 Tokelau working paper
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — education-human-capability — beleshky 1

For Tokelau, early childhood and school education are free through Year 13, with a school on each atoll.

United Nations 2025 Tokelau working paper
Education & Human Capability

Publicly financed schooling gives Tokelau strong foundational education reach, while tertiary study, specialist training, supplies, travel or enrichment still create household costs.

Tokelau Government / National Statistics Office
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-69.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence -12.3

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-69.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-59.1× 25%= -14.8 points
Exact point calculation

18.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points

Original evidence +18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +18.0; Money-gated reading -59.1 × 25% = -14.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Tokelau, government-owned Mataliki serves inter-atoll and international transport with capacity limits.

For Tokelau, no airport and infrequent sea transport make external mobility extremely constrained even where public subsidy exists.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-63.6× 35%= -22.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.25/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

5.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 1.75 weighted points

Original evidence +5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +5.0; Money-gated reading -63.6 × 35% = -22.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Tokelau, a scheduled boat from Samoa travels about fortnightly, with no direct airport service.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-94.8× 25%= -23.7 points
Exact point calculation

-85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -21.25 weighted points

Original evidence -85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -85.0; Money-gated reading -94.8 × 25% = -23.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, medical evacuations and disruptions can delay scheduled journeys; sea trips are long.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-59.1× 15%= -8.9 points
Exact point calculation

18.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.70 weighted points

Original evidence +18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +18.0; Money-gated reading -59.1 × 15% = -8.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

No airport exists; reaching Tokelau requires 24–30-hour sailings from Samoa.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.77 + -22.25 + -23.70 + -8.86 = -69.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -12.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -12.3. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -69.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-12.3 Original evidence category score-12.3 Contribution to national evidence score-0.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 4.50 + 1.75 + -21.25 + 2.70 = -12.30

Base: -12.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -12.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -12.30 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.49 points

For Tokelau, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +13.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — mobility-reachability — beleshky 2

For Tokelau, a scheduled boat from Samoa travels about fortnightly, with no direct airport service.

Tokelau Government: Tourist information
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-47.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +51.9

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-47.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-42.8× 25%= -10.7 points
Exact point calculation

74.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.50 weighted points

Original evidence +74.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +64.9; Money-gated reading -42.8 × 25% = -10.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Tokelau, village councils and extended family leaders remain central to governance; this evidences institutions, not all household outcomes.

For Tokelau, village/community systems, customary sharing and New Zealand-supported public services reduce several household paywalls, but imported food/materials and rare sea transport still require money and create strong logistical friction. The 2023 TFR is 2.610, above replacement but below the TBF target of 5.0.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-45.6× 35%= -16.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

66.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.10 weighted points

Original evidence +66.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +56.9; Money-gated reading -45.6 × 35% = -16.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Tokelau, the 2016 household survey reported about 4.6 people per household; this is an older average.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-55.3× 25%= -13.8 points
Exact point calculation

38.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 9.50 weighted points

Original evidence +38.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +28.9; Money-gated reading -55.3 × 25% = -13.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, there are major missing comparable measures for unpaid care, family welfare and violence.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-45.6× 15%= -6.8 points
Exact point calculation

66.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.90 weighted points

Original evidence +66.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +56.9; Money-gated reading -45.6 × 15% = -6.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, official censuses support population context; the archived fertility estimate (~2.61 in 2023) is UN-modelled rather than a local measured 2026 rate.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.70 + -15.96 + -13.82 + -6.84 = -47.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +61.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -9.1. Effective evidence: +51.9. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -47.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+61.0 Published family-method adjustment-9.1 Original evidence category score+51.9 Contribution to national evidence score+4.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.50 + 23.10 + 9.50 + 9.90 = 61.00

Base: 51.88 · reviewed adjustment: -9.12 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +51.9 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 51.88 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 4.15 points

Why the family-method adjustment is applied

New and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. Family Fertility Method 1.0.0: 60% lived-family rails + 40% fertility performance (38.19/100 from TFR 2.610, 2023, estimated).

For Tokelau, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +51.9

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Pending verification

Deduction calculation: Pending; 0 points deducted provisionally, not a verified zero

Final category calculation: +51.9 − 0 = +51.9 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Legal status not independently reviewed for this jurisdiction; no deduction is assigned. Pending is not a confirmed absence of recognition.

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +8.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — family-formation-stability — beleshky 4

For Tokelau, official censuses support population context; the archived fertility estimate (~2.61 in 2023) is UN-modelled rather than a local measured 2026 rate.

Tokelau National Statistics Office
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — family-formation-stability — beleshky 3

For Tokelau, there are major missing comparable measures for unpaid care, family welfare and violence.

UN Women Tokelau gender data profile
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — family-formation-stability — beleshky 2

For Tokelau, the 2016 household survey reported about 4.6 people per household; this is an older average.

United Nations 2025 Tokelau working paper
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — family-formation-stability — beleshky 1

For Tokelau, village councils and extended family leaders remain central to governance; this evidences institutions, not all household outcomes.

Government of Tokelau: Government and village councils
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

For Tokelau, village/community systems, customary sharing and New Zealand-supported public services reduce several household paywalls, but imported food/materials and rare sea transport still require money and create strong logistical friction. The 2023 TFR is 2.610, above replacement but below the TBF target of 5.0.

UN World Population Prospects 2024 via Our World in Data — Tokelau

Published indicators

Total fertility rate2.61 births per woman

UN World Population Prospects 2024 via Our World in Data — Tokelau · 2023

Source
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-34.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +87.6

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-34.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-33.4× 25%= -8.4 points
Exact point calculation

92.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 23.00 weighted points

Original evidence +92.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +92.0; Money-gated reading -33.4 × 25% = -8.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Tokelau comprises only about 12 km² of land in three low-lying coral atolls.

For Tokelau, customary communal tenure gives families comparatively strong non-market land access, but absolute atoll land area is tiny and climate-exposed.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-34.1× 35%= -11.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 2.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

90.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 31.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -34.1 × 35% = -11.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Tokelau, customary rights and Taupulega control protect family tenure; no universal new-couple minimum allocation is documented.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-36.9× 25%= -9.2 points
Exact point calculation

82.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.50 weighted points

Original evidence +82.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +82.0; Money-gated reading -36.9 × 25% = -9.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Land cannot be transferred to non-Tokelauans and customary transfers require local oversight.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-36.2× 15%= -5.4 points
Exact point calculation

84.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 12.60 weighted points

Original evidence +84.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +84.0; Money-gated reading -36.2 × 15% = -5.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, coconut, pandanus and traditional food crops are grown, while poor soils limit productivity.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -8.35 + -11.93 + -9.22 + -5.43 = -34.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +87.6. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +87.6. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -34.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+87.6 Original evidence category score+87.6 Contribution to national evidence score+4.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 23.00 + 31.50 + 20.50 + 12.60 = 87.60

Base: 87.60 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +87.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 87.60 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 4.38 points

For Tokelau, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +2.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — land-spatial-freedom — beleshky 4

For Tokelau, coconut, pandanus and traditional food crops are grown, while poor soils limit productivity.

Tokelau Government: Land and geography
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — land-spatial-freedom — beleshky 3

Land cannot be transferred to non-Tokelauans and customary transfers require local oversight.

Tokelau General Fono decisions
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — land-spatial-freedom — beleshky 2

For Tokelau, customary rights and Taupulega control protect family tenure; no universal new-couple minimum allocation is documented.

Government of Tokelau: Constitution
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — land-spatial-freedom — beleshky 1

Tokelau comprises only about 12 km² of land in three low-lying coral atolls.

Tokelau Government: Land and geography
Land Access & Spatial Freedom

For Tokelau, customary communal tenure gives families comparatively strong non-market land access, but absolute atoll land area is tiny and climate-exposed.

Tokelau Government / National Statistics Office
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-36.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +82.3

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-36.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-34.1× 25%= -8.5 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -34.1 × 25% = -8.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Tokelau, atolls contain lagoons, reefs and communal settlement landscapes; natural beauty is observable.

For Tokelau, lagoon, ocean and village public life provide high free everyday beauty.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-35.5× 35%= -12.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

86.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 30.10 weighted points

Original evidence +86.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +86.0; Money-gated reading -35.5 × 35% = -12.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Tokelau, local village organizations can sustain communal activities, but uniform access to enjoyable public places is not quantified.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-40.3× 25%= -10.1 points
Exact point calculation

72.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.00 weighted points

Original evidence +72.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +72.0; Money-gated reading -40.3 × 25% = -10.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, storms, heat and coastal erosion place pressures on outdoor living and safety.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-38.3× 15%= -5.7 points
Exact point calculation

78.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 11.70 weighted points

Original evidence +78.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +78.0; Money-gated reading -38.3 × 15% = -5.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, fishing remains a cultural practice and some catches are shared at village scale.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -8.52 + -12.42 + -10.09 + -5.74 = -36.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +82.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +82.3. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -36.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+82.3 Original evidence category score+82.3 Contribution to national evidence score+4.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 30.10 + 18.00 + 11.70 = 82.30

Base: 82.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +82.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 82.30 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 4.94 points

For Tokelau, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +4.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — peace-beauty-delight — beleshky 2

For Tokelau, local village organizations can sustain communal activities, but uniform access to enjoyable public places is not quantified.

Government of Tokelau
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — peace-beauty-delight — beleshky 1

For Tokelau, atolls contain lagoons, reefs and communal settlement landscapes; natural beauty is observable.

Government of Tokelau: About Us
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-37.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +81.1

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-37.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-34.8× 25%= -8.7 points
Exact point calculation

88.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.00 weighted points

Original evidence +88.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +88.0; Money-gated reading -34.8 × 25% = -8.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Tokelau, atoll landscapes support coconut and pandanus, plus limited staple crops.

For Tokelau, high renewable-electricity penetration, customary stewardship and tight communities are positives; sea-level rise, drought and cyclone exposure are existential risks.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-36.2× 35%= -12.7 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

84.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 29.40 weighted points

Original evidence +84.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +84.0; Money-gated reading -36.2 × 35% = -12.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Tokelau, marine resources and terrestrial land systems are climate exposed.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-42.4× 25%= -10.6 points
Exact point calculation

66.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.50 weighted points

Original evidence +66.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +66.0; Money-gated reading -42.4 × 25% = -10.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, drought, saltwater intrusion, coral bleaching and coastal changes threaten living systems.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-34.8× 15%= -5.2 points
Exact point calculation

88.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 13.20 weighted points

Original evidence +88.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +88.0; Money-gated reading -34.8 × 15% = -5.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, national resilience projects and environment plans are underway, but progress metrics are incomplete.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -8.70 + -12.66 + -10.61 + -5.22 = -37.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +81.1. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +81.1. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -37.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+81.1 Original evidence category score+81.1 Contribution to national evidence score+4.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.00 + 29.40 + 16.50 + 13.20 = 81.10

Base: 81.10 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +81.1 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 81.10 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 4.87 points

For Tokelau, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +4.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — living-ground-resilience — beleshky 4

For Tokelau, national resilience projects and environment plans are underway, but progress metrics are incomplete.

United Nations 2025 Tokelau working paper
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — living-ground-resilience — beleshky 1

For Tokelau, atoll landscapes support coconut and pandanus, plus limited staple crops.

Tokelau Government: Land and geography
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

For Tokelau, high renewable-electricity penetration, customary stewardship and tight communities are positives; sea-level rise, drought and cyclone exposure are existential risks.

Tokelau Government / National Statistics Office
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-42.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +65.5

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-42.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-38.3× 25%= -9.6 points
Exact point calculation

78.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 19.50 weighted points

Original evidence +78.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +78.0; Money-gated reading -38.3 × 25% = -9.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Tokelau, village Taupulega and the elected General Fono comprise overlapping customary and representative governance.

Tokelau has functioning courts and public administration, but immigration, housing/land, permits, documentation and geographic or procedural complexity still create institutional friction.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-40.3× 35%= -14.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

72.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 25.20 weighted points

Original evidence +72.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +72.0; Money-gated reading -40.3 × 35% = -14.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Tokelau, councils represent family heads and elders differently between atolls.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-49.4× 25%= -12.3 points
Exact point calculation

46.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 11.50 weighted points

Original evidence +46.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +46.0; Money-gated reading -49.4 × 25% = -12.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

UN Women reports missing violence and gender justice indicators in Tokelau.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-43.8× 15%= -6.6 points
Exact point calculation

62.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.30 weighted points

Original evidence +62.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +62.0; Money-gated reading -43.8 × 15% = -6.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, constitutional documentation describes public-service and legal rules, but does not prove quick remedies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -9.57 + -14.12 + -12.34 + -6.57 = -42.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +65.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +65.5. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -42.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+65.5 Original evidence category score+65.5 Contribution to national evidence score+3.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 19.50 + 25.20 + 11.50 + 9.30 = 65.50

Base: 65.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +65.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 65.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 3.28 points

For Tokelau, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — justice-safety-friction — beleshky 4

For Tokelau, constitutional documentation describes public-service and legal rules, but does not prove quick remedies.

Government of Tokelau: Constitution
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — justice-safety-friction — beleshky 3

UN Women reports missing violence and gender justice indicators in Tokelau.

UN Women Tokelau gender data profile
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — justice-safety-friction — beleshky 1

For Tokelau, village Taupulega and the elected General Fono comprise overlapping customary and representative governance.

Government of Tokelau
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

Tokelau has functioning courts and public administration, but immigration, housing/land, permits, documentation and geographic or procedural complexity still create institutional friction.

Tokelau Government / National Statistics Office
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-51.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +40.4

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-51.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-45.2× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

58.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 14.50 weighted points

Original evidence +58.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +58.0; Money-gated reading -45.2 × 25% = -11.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Tokelau, imported goods and supply logistics support basic development and household material needs.

Repair and maintenance are normal parts of island/remote life in Tokelau, yet imported parts, specialist labour and replacement logistics keep material continuity substantially money-dependent.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.4× 35%= -17.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

46.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 16.10 weighted points

Original evidence +46.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +46.0; Money-gated reading -49.4 × 35% = -17.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Tokelau, village waste plans and a Samoa agreement for recyclable and solid-waste shipment are described.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-62.5× 25%= -15.6 points
Exact point calculation

8.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 2.00 weighted points

Original evidence +8.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +8.0; Money-gated reading -62.5 × 25% = -15.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, the government identifies accumulated solid waste, hazardous substances and water pollution as serious problems.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-47.3× 15%= -7.1 points
Exact point calculation

52.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.80 weighted points

Original evidence +52.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +52.0; Money-gated reading -47.3 × 15% = -7.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, strategies call for reduced packaging imports, improved waste management and recycling.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.30 + -17.28 + -15.64 + -7.08 = -51.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +40.4. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +40.4. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -51.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+40.4 Original evidence category score+40.4 Contribution to national evidence score+1.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 14.50 + 16.10 + 2.00 + 7.80 = 40.40

Base: 40.40 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +40.4 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 40.40 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.62 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

For Tokelau, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — durability-material-return — beleshky 4

For Tokelau, strategies call for reduced packaging imports, improved waste management and recycling.

Government of Tokelau: Strategic Plan
Durability, Repair & Material Return

Repair and maintenance are normal parts of island/remote life in Tokelau, yet imported parts, specialist labour and replacement logistics keep material continuity substantially money-dependent.

Tokelau Government / National Statistics Office
6% weight International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
-57.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +23.4

International score breakdown

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

-57.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Entry Accessibility 25%
See all nine International Welcome Entry Accessibility scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-52.1× 25%= -13.0 points
Exact point calculation

38.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 9.50 weighted points

Original evidence +38.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +38.0; Money-gated reading -52.1 × 25% = -13.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Foreign visitors need Taupulega permission before entering; Tokelauan citizenship is a separate domestic issue.

For Tokelau, entry and residence are administratively narrow and practical absorption is constrained by tiny land/service capacity, even though New Zealand-realm links provide continuity for residents.

🤔
Migrant Practical Life 30%
See all nine International Welcome Migrant Practical Life scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-54.2× 30%= -16.3 points
Exact point calculation

32.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 9.60 weighted points

Original evidence +32.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +32.0; Money-gated reading -54.2 × 30% = -16.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, tourist infrastructure is very limited and visitors rely on local accommodation and boat services.

🤔
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome 25%
See all nine International Welcome Refugee / Neighbour Welcome scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-68.8× 25%= -17.2 points
Exact point calculation

-10.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -2.50 weighted points

Original evidence -10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -10.0; Money-gated reading -68.8 × 25% = -17.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Tokelauans have New Zealand citizenship and access to benefits there, but that is not evidence of foreign refugee admission into Tokelau.

🤔
Flexibility / Continuity 20%
See all nine International Welcome Flexibility / Continuity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-53.5× 20%= -10.7 points
Exact point calculation

34.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 6.80 weighted points

Original evidence +34.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +34.0; Money-gated reading -53.5 × 20% = -10.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, entry involves permission and maritime travel; regular service and continuity for outsiders are constrained.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.03 + -16.26 + -17.20 + -10.71 = -57.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +23.4. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +23.4. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -57.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+23.4 Original evidence category score+23.4 Contribution to national evidence score+1.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 9.50 + 9.60 + -2.50 + 6.80 = 23.40

Base: 23.40 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +23.4 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 23.40 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.40 points

For Tokelau, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — international-access-human-welcome — beleshky 4

For Tokelau, entry involves permission and maritime travel; regular service and continuity for outsiders are constrained.

Government of Canada travel advice for Tokelau
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — international-access-human-welcome — beleshky 3

Tokelauans have New Zealand citizenship and access to benefits there, but that is not evidence of foreign refugee admission into Tokelau.

New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — international-access-human-welcome — beleshky 2

For Tokelau, tourist infrastructure is very limited and visitors rely on local accommodation and boat services.

Tokelau Government: Tourist information
International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

For Tokelau, entry and residence are administratively narrow and practical absorption is constrained by tiny land/service capacity, even though New Zealand-realm links provide continuity for residents.

Tokelau Government / National Statistics Office
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-46.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +53.4

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-46.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Positive Contribution 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-45.2× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

58.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 14.50 weighted points

Original evidence +58.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +58.0; Money-gated reading -45.2 × 25% = -11.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Tokelau uses fisheries licences and New Zealand budget assistance; its overseas useful contributions are not quantified.

Tokelau’s small footprint and renewable-energy transition are positives, while shipping/import dependence and climate vulnerability make external support essential.

🤔
Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-43.8× 25%= -11.0 points
Exact point calculation

62.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.50 weighted points

Original evidence +62.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +62.0; Money-gated reading -43.8 × 25% = -11.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, fisheries licences are part of shared Pacific regional management, but local benefit and impacts differ by scheme.

🤔
Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-50.7× 35%= -17.8 points
Exact point calculation

42.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.70 weighted points

Original evidence +42.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +42.0; Money-gated reading -50.7 × 35% = -17.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, low-lying atolls face marine and waste harms; outward external ecological harm has not been quantified.

🤔
Accountability / Repair 15%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-45.2× 15%= -6.8 points
Exact point calculation

58.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.70 weighted points

Original evidence +58.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +58.0; Money-gated reading -45.2 × 15% = -6.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Tokelau, imported packaging and exported waste/recyclables illustrate material dependence and off-island waste burdens.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.30 + -10.95 + -17.76 + -6.78 = -46.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +53.4. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +53.4. Money Gate ceiling: -30.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -46.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+53.4 Original evidence category score+53.4 Contribution to national evidence score+3.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 14.50 + 15.50 + 14.70 + 8.70 = 53.40

Base: 53.40 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +53.4 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 53.40 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 3.20 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Exported waste / garbageAudit pending
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

For Tokelau, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Tokelau’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — external-footprint-non-extractive — beleshky 2

For Tokelau, fisheries licences are part of shared Pacific regional management, but local benefit and impacts differ by scheme.

United Nations 2025 Tokelau working paper
2026-10-22 TKL 64-source review — external-footprint-non-extractive — beleshky 1

Tokelau uses fisheries licences and New Zealand budget assistance; its overseas useful contributions are not quantified.

New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade
External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

Tokelau’s small footprint and renewable-energy transition are positives, while shipping/import dependence and climate vulnerability make external support essential.

Tokelau Government / National Statistics Office

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.