Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Serbia 🇷🇸

Serbia currently ranks #84 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -59.73. This country is under the national Money Gate, strongest in Food and weakest in Living Ground among 15 scored of 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Data updatedResearch handoff completed
TBF Abundance Score
-59.7
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: +37.6 · Money Gate: 3.42/20 · Headline: -59.7.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#84of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

SerbiaLast recorded move: down from #83 to #84.Recent recorded movements
  1. #83 → #8423 Oct 2026 · 19:04 GMT-0500
  2. #73 → #8320 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  3. #73 → #7620 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #231 → #23020 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 35: rank 81. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 35: rank 81. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 9 Oct 2026 · 07:51 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 35: rank 78. 9 Oct 2026 · 12:04 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 35: rank 77. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 35: rank 76. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 35: rank 75. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 35: rank 74. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 35: rank 65. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 35: rank 65. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 35: rank 64. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 35: rank 63. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 35: rank 64. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 35: rank 65. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 35: rank 64. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 35: rank 65. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 35: rank 66. 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 35: rank 65. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500 – 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 35: rank 64. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500 – 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 35: rank 63. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 35: rank 62. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 35: rank 61. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 35: rank 60. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 35: rank 59. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 35: rank 58. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 35: rank 57. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 35: rank 56. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 35: rank 55. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 35: rank 54. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 35: rank 53. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 35: rank 52. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 35: rank 231. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 35: rank 230. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 16:49 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 35: rank 73. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 35: rank 76. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 35: rank 84. 23 Oct 2026 · 19:04 GMT-0500NOW #84Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

91%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 78.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 76.0% = 90.58% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 1 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#75

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

— Pending

Food

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Housing / Land

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Healthcare

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Transportation

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Water / Energy

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

Money Gate · Five essentials
  • FoodPending
  • Housing / LandPending
  • HealthcarePending
  • TransportationPending
  • Water / EnergyPending
  • Money still neededNot measured

The existing transitional gate estimate is not split into invented category scores. Five direct category audits are still needed.

Why this reading is pending

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Five separate Money Gate components inform this reading.

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
69.2 / 100
Why 69.2 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -38.48) ÷ 2 = 69.24 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-41.5
Why -41.5?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 3.42 = -41.5

The transitional value is derived from published domestic Reach and Friction rails only to preserve historical ordering. It is not a substitute for the five direct 0–4 gate findings above and can never clear the Money Gate.

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-58.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence +42.1

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-58.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-47.3× 25%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -47.3 × 25% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Time abundance is assessed through paid work, informal work, unpaid care, commuting and administrative burden rather than output or employment alone.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-50.8× 35%= -17.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Original evidence +68.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +68.0; Money-gated reading -50.8 × 35% = -17.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Time abundance is assessed through paid work, informal work, unpaid care, commuting and administrative burden rather than output or employment alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-69.3× 25%= -17.3 points
Exact point calculation

5.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 1.25 weighted points

Original evidence +5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +5.0; Money-gated reading -69.3 × 25% = -17.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Time abundance is assessed through paid work, informal work, unpaid care, commuting and administrative burden rather than output or employment alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-76.6× 15%= -11.5 points
Exact point calculation

-20.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.00 weighted points

Original evidence -20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -20.0; Money-gated reading -76.6 × 15% = -11.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Time abundance is assessed through paid work, informal work, unpaid care, commuting and administrative burden rather than output or employment alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.83 + -17.79 + -17.32 + -11.47 = -58.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +42.1. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +42.1. Money Gate ceiling: -41.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+42.1 Original evidence category score+42.1 Contribution to national evidence score+3.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + 1.25 + -3.00 = 42.05

Base: 42.05 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +42.1 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 42.05 × (9.00 × 78.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 3.26 points

For Serbia, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 78% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.02%. After normalization across Serbia’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Serbia: Human Time & Burden Return research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Time abundance is assessed through paid work, informal work, unpaid care, commuting and administrative burden rather than output or employment alone.

World Bank — Serbia overview
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-58.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +41.6

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-58.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-47.3× 25%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -47.3 × 25% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Housing is judged on adequacy, affordability, resilience, security and ordinary household reach rather than construction volume alone.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-50.8× 35%= -17.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Original evidence +68.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +68.0; Money-gated reading -50.8 × 35% = -17.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Housing is judged on adequacy, affordability, resilience, security and ordinary household reach rather than construction volume alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.9× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.9 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Housing is judged on adequacy, affordability, resilience, security and ordinary household reach rather than construction volume alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-53.2× 15%= -8.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -53.2 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Housing is judged on adequacy, affordability, resilience, security and ordinary household reach rather than construction volume alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.83 + -17.79 + -20.97 + -7.97 = -58.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +41.6. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +41.6. Money Gate ceiling: -41.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.6 Original evidence category score+41.6 Contribution to national evidence score+3.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 41.55

Base: 41.55 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.55 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 3.67 points

For Serbia, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Serbia’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Serbia: Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Housing is judged on adequacy, affordability, resilience, security and ordinary household reach rather than construction volume alone.

World Bank — Serbia overview
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-54.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +54.9

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-54.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-45.8× 25%= -11.5 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -45.8 × 25% = -11.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Food production and market supply are separated from household affordability, diet quality, nutrition security and dependable public/free nourishment routes.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-44.1× 35%= -15.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

91.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 31.85 weighted points

Original evidence +91.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +91.0; Money-gated reading -44.1 × 35% = -15.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Food production and market supply are separated from household affordability, diet quality, nutrition security and dependable public/free nourishment routes.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.0× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Food production and market supply are separated from household affordability, diet quality, nutrition security and dependable public/free nourishment routes.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-50.2× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -50.2 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Food production and market supply are separated from household affordability, diet quality, nutrition security and dependable public/free nourishment routes.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.46 + -15.43 + -20.24 + -7.54 = -54.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +54.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +54.9. Money Gate ceiling: -41.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -54.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+54.9 Original evidence category score+54.9 Contribution to national evidence score+5.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 31.85 + -8.75 + 10.50 = 54.85

Base: 54.85 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +54.9 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 54.85 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 5.45 points

For Serbia, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Serbia’s researched categories, this category contributes +5.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Serbia: Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Food production and market supply are separated from household affordability, diet quality, nutrition security and dependable public/free nourishment routes.

UNICEF Data — Serbia
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-59.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence +38.8

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-59.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-45.8× 25%= -11.5 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -45.8 × 25% = -11.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Water and sanitation are judged on safe household reach, continuity, quality, rural/urban distribution and affordability rather than infrastructure announcements alone.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.6× 35%= -20.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -57.6 × 35% = -20.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Water and sanitation are judged on safe household reach, continuity, quality, rural/urban distribution and affordability rather than infrastructure announcements alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.0× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Water and sanitation are judged on safe household reach, continuity, quality, rural/urban distribution and affordability rather than infrastructure announcements alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-50.2× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -50.2 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Water and sanitation are judged on safe household reach, continuity, quality, rural/urban distribution and affordability rather than infrastructure announcements alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.46 + -20.14 + -20.24 + -7.54 = -59.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +38.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +38.8. Money Gate ceiling: -41.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -59.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+38.8 Original evidence category score+38.8 Contribution to national evidence score+2.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 15.75 + -8.75 + 10.50 = 38.75

Base: 38.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +38.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 38.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 2.57 points

For Serbia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Serbia’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Serbia: Water & Sanitation Abundance research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Water and sanitation are judged on safe household reach, continuity, quality, rural/urban distribution and affordability rather than infrastructure announcements alone.

UNICEF Data — Serbia
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-57.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +45.8

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-57.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-47.3× 25%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -47.3 × 25% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Energy is judged on connection, reliability, affordability and household capability rather than generation or export capacity alone.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-47.3× 35%= -16.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

80.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 28.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -47.3 × 35% = -16.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Energy is judged on connection, reliability, affordability and household capability rather than generation or export capacity alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.9× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.9 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Energy is judged on connection, reliability, affordability and household capability rather than generation or export capacity alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-53.2× 15%= -8.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -53.2 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Energy is judged on connection, reliability, affordability and household capability rather than generation or export capacity alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.83 + -16.56 + -20.97 + -7.97 = -57.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +45.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +45.8. Money Gate ceiling: -41.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -57.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+45.8 Original evidence category score+45.8 Contribution to national evidence score+2.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 28.00 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 45.75

Base: 45.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +45.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 45.75 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 2.53 points

For Serbia, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Serbia’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Serbia: Energy & Household Capability research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Energy is judged on connection, reliability, affordability and household capability rather than generation or export capacity alone.

World Bank — Serbia overview
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-61.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +30.0

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-61.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-47.3× 25%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -47.3 × 25% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. WHO documents a nationwide health system, while access, health outcomes and geographic/social differences still require attention. Health abundance is judged on actual care reach, financial protection, geographic access and service reliability rather than legal entitlement alone.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-60.5× 35%= -21.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -60.5 × 35% = -21.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. WHO documents a nationwide health system, while access, health outcomes and geographic/social differences still require attention. Health abundance is judged on actual care reach, financial protection, geographic access and service reliability rather than legal entitlement alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.9× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.9 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. WHO documents a nationwide health system, while access, health outcomes and geographic/social differences still require attention. Health abundance is judged on actual care reach, financial protection, geographic access and service reliability rather than legal entitlement alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-53.2× 15%= -8.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -53.2 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. WHO documents a nationwide health system, while access, health outcomes and geographic/social differences still require attention. Health abundance is judged on actual care reach, financial protection, geographic access and service reliability rather than legal entitlement alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.83 + -21.17 + -20.97 + -7.97 = -61.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +30.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +30.0. Money Gate ceiling: -41.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -61.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+30.0 Original evidence category score+30.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 12.25 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 30.00

Base: 30.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +30.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 30.00 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 2.32 points

For Serbia, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Serbia’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Serbia: Health & Care Reach research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. WHO documents a nationwide health system, while access, health outcomes and geographic/social differences still require attention. Health abundance is judged on actual care reach, financial protection, geographic access and service reliability rather than legal entitlement alone.

World Health Organization — Serbia
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-56.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +49.3

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-56.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-45.8× 25%= -11.5 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -45.8 × 25% = -11.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Broad education infrastructure and child-focused public systems provide substantial capability, but inclusion and outcome gaps remain relevant. Education is judged on real learning, access, completion, inclusion and human capability rather than enrolment alone.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-48.8× 35%= -17.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -48.8 × 35% = -17.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Broad education infrastructure and child-focused public systems provide substantial capability, but inclusion and outcome gaps remain relevant. Education is judged on real learning, access, completion, inclusion and human capability rather than enrolment alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-81.0× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Broad education infrastructure and child-focused public systems provide substantial capability, but inclusion and outcome gaps remain relevant. Education is judged on real learning, access, completion, inclusion and human capability rather than enrolment alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-50.2× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -50.2 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Broad education infrastructure and child-focused public systems provide substantial capability, but inclusion and outcome gaps remain relevant. Education is judged on real learning, access, completion, inclusion and human capability rather than enrolment alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.46 + -17.07 + -20.24 + -7.54 = -56.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +49.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +49.3. Money Gate ceiling: -41.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -56.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+49.3 Original evidence category score+49.3 Contribution to national evidence score+3.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 26.25 + -8.75 + 10.50 = 49.25

Base: 49.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +49.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 49.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 3.26 points

For Serbia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Serbia’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Serbia: Education & Human Capability research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Broad education infrastructure and child-focused public systems provide substantial capability, but inclusion and outcome gaps remain relevant. Education is judged on real learning, access, completion, inclusion and human capability rather than enrolment alone.

UNICEF Data — Serbia
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-58.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +41.6

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-58.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-47.3× 25%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -47.3 × 25% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Mobility is judged on safe, affordable reach to daily life, public transport, roads and geographic inclusion rather than infrastructure length alone.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-50.8× 35%= -17.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Original evidence +68.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +68.0; Money-gated reading -50.8 × 35% = -17.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Mobility is judged on safe, affordable reach to daily life, public transport, roads and geographic inclusion rather than infrastructure length alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-83.9× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.9 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Mobility is judged on safe, affordable reach to daily life, public transport, roads and geographic inclusion rather than infrastructure length alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-53.2× 15%= -8.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -53.2 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Mobility is judged on safe, affordable reach to daily life, public transport, roads and geographic inclusion rather than infrastructure length alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.83 + -17.79 + -20.97 + -7.97 = -58.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +41.6. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +41.6. Money Gate ceiling: -41.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.6 Original evidence category score+41.6 Contribution to national evidence score+1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 41.55

Base: 41.55 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.55 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 1.83 points

For Serbia, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Serbia’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Serbia: Mobility & Reachability research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Mobility is judged on safe, affordable reach to daily life, public transport, roads and geographic inclusion rather than infrastructure length alone.

World Bank — Serbia overview
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-58.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +41.6

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-58.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-47.3× 25%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -47.3 × 25% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Family stability is judged on whether housing, care, income, childcare and public systems reduce burdens on family formation and child continuity.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-50.8× 35%= -17.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Original evidence +68.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +68.0; Money-gated reading -50.8 × 35% = -17.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Family stability is judged on whether housing, care, income, childcare and public systems reduce burdens on family formation and child continuity.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-83.9× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.9 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Family stability is judged on whether housing, care, income, childcare and public systems reduce burdens on family formation and child continuity.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-53.2× 15%= -8.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -53.2 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Family stability is judged on whether housing, care, income, childcare and public systems reduce burdens on family formation and child continuity.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.83 + -17.79 + -20.97 + -7.97 = -58.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +41.6. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +41.6. Money Gate ceiling: -41.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.6 Original evidence category score+41.6 Contribution to national evidence score+3.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 41.55

Base: 41.55 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.55 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 3.67 points

For Serbia, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Serbia’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +41.6

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: +41.6 − 0 = +41.6 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Serbia: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded in the cited legal-status review as of 2026-10-09. Constitution Article 62 specifies consent between a man and a woman for marriage. This is a legal-classification reading only; it does not prove demographic causation.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2006-11-08 · Reviewed: 2026-10-09

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Serbia: Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Family stability is judged on whether housing, care, income, childcare and public systems reduce burdens on family formation and child continuity.

UNICEF Data — Serbia
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-58.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +41.6

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-58.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-47.3× 25%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -47.3 × 25% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Land abundance is judged on practical access, tenure, productive/open space and the ability of ordinary households to use space without prohibitive financial barriers.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-50.8× 35%= -17.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Original evidence +68.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +68.0; Money-gated reading -50.8 × 35% = -17.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Land abundance is judged on practical access, tenure, productive/open space and the ability of ordinary households to use space without prohibitive financial barriers.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-83.9× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.9 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Land abundance is judged on practical access, tenure, productive/open space and the ability of ordinary households to use space without prohibitive financial barriers.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-53.2× 15%= -8.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -53.2 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Land abundance is judged on practical access, tenure, productive/open space and the ability of ordinary households to use space without prohibitive financial barriers.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.83 + -17.79 + -20.97 + -7.97 = -58.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +41.6. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +41.6. Money Gate ceiling: -41.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.6 Original evidence category score+41.6 Contribution to national evidence score+2.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 41.55

Base: 41.55 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.55 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 2.29 points

For Serbia, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Serbia’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Serbia: Land Access & Spatial Freedom research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Land abundance is judged on practical access, tenure, productive/open space and the ability of ordinary households to use space without prohibitive financial barriers.

World Bank — Serbia overview
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-58.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +41.6

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-58.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-47.3× 25%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -47.3 × 25% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. This category considers safety, environmental quality, public space, cultural/natural beauty and whether daily life leaves room for restoration and delight.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-50.8× 35%= -17.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Original evidence +68.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +68.0; Money-gated reading -50.8 × 35% = -17.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. This category considers safety, environmental quality, public space, cultural/natural beauty and whether daily life leaves room for restoration and delight.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-83.9× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.9 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. This category considers safety, environmental quality, public space, cultural/natural beauty and whether daily life leaves room for restoration and delight.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-53.2× 15%= -8.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -53.2 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. This category considers safety, environmental quality, public space, cultural/natural beauty and whether daily life leaves room for restoration and delight.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.83 + -17.79 + -20.97 + -7.97 = -58.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +41.6. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +41.6. Money Gate ceiling: -41.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.6 Original evidence category score+41.6 Contribution to national evidence score+2.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 41.55

Base: 41.55 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.55 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 2.75 points

For Serbia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Serbia’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Serbia: Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. This category considers safety, environmental quality, public space, cultural/natural beauty and whether daily life leaves room for restoration and delight.

World Bank — Serbia overview
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-70.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence -0.5

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-70.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-47.3× 25%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -47.3 × 25% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Living ground is judged on biodiversity, ecological condition, climate resilience, water/soil systems and demonstrated restoration rather than plans alone.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-85.9× 35%= -30.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-52.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -18.20 weighted points

Original evidence -52.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -52.0; Money-gated reading -85.9 × 35% = -30.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Living ground is judged on biodiversity, ecological condition, climate resilience, water/soil systems and demonstrated restoration rather than plans alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-83.9× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.9 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Living ground is judged on biodiversity, ecological condition, climate resilience, water/soil systems and demonstrated restoration rather than plans alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-53.2× 15%= -8.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -53.2 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Living ground is judged on biodiversity, ecological condition, climate resilience, water/soil systems and demonstrated restoration rather than plans alone.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.83 + -30.08 + -20.97 + -7.98 = -70.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -0.4. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -0.5. Money Gate ceiling: -41.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -70.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-0.4 Original evidence category score-0.5 Contribution to national evidence score0.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + -18.20 + -11.25 + 9.00 = -0.45

Base: -0.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -0.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -0.45 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = -0.03 points

For Serbia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Serbia’s researched categories, this category contributes 0.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Serbia: Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Living ground is judged on biodiversity, ecological condition, climate resilience, water/soil systems and demonstrated restoration rather than plans alone.

World Bank — Serbia overview
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-60.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence +35.3

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-60.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-54.6× 25%= -13.7 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -54.6 × 25% = -13.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Justice is judged on safety, legal access, administrative friction, accessibility and whether ordinary people can resolve problems without prohibitive cost or delay.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-50.8× 35%= -17.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Original evidence +68.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +68.0; Money-gated reading -50.8 × 35% = -17.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Justice is judged on safety, legal access, administrative friction, accessibility and whether ordinary people can resolve problems without prohibitive cost or delay.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-83.9× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.9 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Justice is judged on safety, legal access, administrative friction, accessibility and whether ordinary people can resolve problems without prohibitive cost or delay.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-53.2× 15%= -8.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -53.2 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Justice is judged on safety, legal access, administrative friction, accessibility and whether ordinary people can resolve problems without prohibitive cost or delay.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.66 + -17.79 + -20.97 + -7.97 = -60.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +35.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +35.3. Money Gate ceiling: -41.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -60.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+35.3 Original evidence category score+35.3 Contribution to national evidence score+1.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 23.80 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 35.30

Base: 35.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 35.30 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 1.95 points

For Serbia, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Serbia’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Serbia: Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Justice is judged on safety, legal access, administrative friction, accessibility and whether ordinary people can resolve problems without prohibitive cost or delay.

World Bank — Serbia overview
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-58.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +41.6

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-58.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-47.3× 25%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -47.3 × 25% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Durability is judged on repair, reuse, waste collection, recycling/material return and whether circular systems actually reach daily life.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-50.8× 35%= -17.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points

Original evidence +68.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +68.0; Money-gated reading -50.8 × 35% = -17.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Durability is judged on repair, reuse, waste collection, recycling/material return and whether circular systems actually reach daily life.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.9× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.9 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Durability is judged on repair, reuse, waste collection, recycling/material return and whether circular systems actually reach daily life.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-53.2× 15%= -8.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -53.2 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Durability is judged on repair, reuse, waste collection, recycling/material return and whether circular systems actually reach daily life.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.83 + -17.79 + -20.97 + -7.97 = -58.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +41.6. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +41.6. Money Gate ceiling: -41.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.6 Original evidence category score+41.6 Contribution to national evidence score+1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 41.55

Base: 41.55 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.55 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 1.83 points

For Serbia, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Serbia’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +12.0

What the evidence found

Serbia: Durability, Repair & Material Return research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. Durability is judged on repair, reuse, waste collection, recycling/material return and whether circular systems actually reach daily life.

World Bank — Serbia overview
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-69.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence +4.3

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-69.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Positive Contribution 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-63.5× 25%= -15.9 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +24.6; Money-gated reading -63.5 × 25% = -15.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. This category remains evidence-only. No complete net audit of trade, extraction, emissions, finance, security, accountability and repair is collapsed into a policy score.

🤔
Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-63.5× 25%= -15.9 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +24.6; Money-gated reading -63.5 × 25% = -15.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. This category remains evidence-only. No complete net audit of trade, extraction, emissions, finance, security, accountability and repair is collapsed into a policy score.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-75.2× 35%= -26.3 points
Exact point calculation

-15.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -5.25 weighted points

Original evidence -15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -15.4; Money-gated reading -75.2 × 35% = -26.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. This category remains evidence-only. No complete net audit of trade, extraction, emissions, finance, security, accountability and repair is collapsed into a policy score.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Accountability / Repair 15%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-76.0× 15%= -11.4 points
Exact point calculation

-17.50 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -2.63 weighted points

Original evidence -17.5; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -17.9; Money-gated reading -76.0 × 15% = -11.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. This category remains evidence-only. No complete net audit of trade, extraction, emissions, finance, security, accountability and repair is collapsed into a policy score.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -15.88 + -15.88 + -26.33 + -11.39 = -69.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +4.6. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.4. Effective evidence: +4.3. Money Gate ceiling: -41.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -69.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+4.6 Published research adjustment-0.4 Original evidence category score+4.3 Contribution to national evidence score+0.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 6.25 + 6.25 + -5.25 + -2.63 = 4.63

Base: 4.25 · reviewed adjustment: -0.38 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +4.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 4.25 × (6.00 × 76.00%) ÷ 90.58 = 0.21 points

Material transfers: scored in International Footprint

Exporter responsibility: -10.00/100 (15% of footprint); importer responsibility: -25.00/100 (15% of footprint). Material movement is a real workload; these are TBF authored judgments, not certified illegal dumping estimates. Each role is included ONCE in the Footprint 3.1 published score.

Exported waste / garbageRole: -10.00/100 · scored
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingRole: -10.00/100 · scored
Accepted imported garbageRole: -25.00/100 · scored
Accepted low-utility dumpingRole: -25.00/100 · scored

The material-transfer burden already affects the published score. Facility-specific downstream harm remains a separate research claim. No second penalty is added for the same trade.

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Method 3.1.6: weights 25/25/20/30, exporter/importer each 15%. New provisional authored rails 1-3 based on source https://www.worldbank.org/ext/en/country/serbia; Exporter: 1,787,550 kg of plastic scrap recorded as national total in 2024. Importer: 16,700,000 kg of plastic scrap recorded as national total in 2024. HS3915 sources: https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/SER/year/2024/tradeflow/Exports/partner/ALL/product/3915 | https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/SER/year/2024/tradeflow/Imports/partner/ALL/product/3915. These do not prove illegal dumping or total garbage volumes.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Serbia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 76% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.56%. After normalization across Serbia’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

Serbia: External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. This category remains evidence-only. No complete net audit of trade, extraction, emissions, finance, security, accountability and repair is collapsed into a policy score.

World Bank — Serbia overview
6% weight · research presentInternational Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending

The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.

Country findings and sources

Serbia: International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome research finding

Serbia is an upper-middle-income Southeastern European country with broad infrastructure, health and education networks and growing digital public-service capability. Regional inequality, household costs, demographic pressure, air/environmental burdens and incomplete circularity prevent those systems from being treated as frictionless universal abundance. This category remains evidence-only. Entry, residence and participation pathways are recorded without collapsing them into a policy score.

World Bank — Serbia overview

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.