Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Botswana 🇧🇼

Botswana currently ranks #117 of 241 on the TBF Abundance Scorecard, scoring -62.99. This country is with a pending direct Money Gate review, strongest in Living Ground and weakest in Human Time among 14 scored of 16 evidence categories.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Data updatedDataset rebuilt during live integration
TBF Abundance Score
-63.0
Evidence before Abundance Gate +31.2
How the headline score is calculated

Evidence before Gate = Σ (published category score × category weight × research coverage) ÷ Σ (category weight × research coverage). The five-part Money Gate sets a proportional ceiling, with Friction already in the category evidence score.

Current evidence: +31.2 · Money Gate: 2.57/20 · Cash-register lock: +87.2 · Graded pressure: +87.2 · Headline: -63.0.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#117of 241

Global standing based on life reachability

BotswanaLast recorded move: up from #118 to #117.Recent recorded movements
  1. #118 → #11714 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500
  2. #119 → #11814 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500
  3. #120 → #11914 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500
  4. #121 → #12013 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 30: rank 126. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 30: rank 128. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 30: rank 129. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 30: rank 129. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 9 Oct 2026 · 07:51 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 30: rank 128. 9 Oct 2026 · 12:04 GMT-0500 – 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 30: rank 129. 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500 – 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 30: rank 128. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 30: rank 129. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 30: rank 128. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 30: rank 129. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 30: rank 130. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 30: rank 129. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 30: rank 128. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 30: rank 127. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 30: rank 126. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 30: rank 125. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 30: rank 124. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 30: rank 123. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 30: rank 122. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 30: rank 123. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 30: rank 124. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 30: rank 123. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 30: rank 122. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 30: rank 123. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 30: rank 122. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 30: rank 121. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 30: rank 120. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 30: rank 119. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 30: rank 118. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 30: rank 117. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500NOW #117Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

National Abundance Gate

Money-gated

Graded status · five basics not fully cleared

Research Coverage

88%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% = 88.00% weighted coverage

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored; 2 / 2 international categories with documented research (scores require full audit)

GDP Rank

#130

Shown for context, not as the abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

The five-part direct reading is still pending. Missing gate readings remain pending rather than being converted into invented free-access points.

— Pending

Food

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Housing / Land

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Healthcare

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Transportation

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Water / Energy

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

Money Gate · Direct audit pending
  • FoodPending
  • Housing / LandPending
  • HealthcarePending
  • TransportationPending
  • Water / EnergyPending
  • Money still neededNot measured

The existing transitional gate estimate is not split into invented category scores. Five direct category audits are still needed.

Why this reading is pending

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

No category-level 0–4 point calculation is available until a direct Money Gate audit is completed.

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Cash-Register Lock
87.2 / 100
Why 87.2 / 100?

The five direct Money Gate readings total 0–20. Every point removes five of the 100 payment-lock units; a 7/20 reading produces a 65/100 lock.

Actual calculation

100 - (2.57 × 5) = 87.15

Friction Economy Pressure
76.5 / 100
Why 76.5 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -52.90) ÷ 2 = 76.45 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-43.6
Why -43.6?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

87.15 = 87.15 (Friction already counted in category scores)

-50 + 2.5 × 2.57 = -43.6

The transitional value is derived from published domestic Reach and Friction rails only to preserve historical ordering. It is not a substitute for the five direct 0–4 gate findings above and can never clear the Money Gate.

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale once verified. International Welcome and External Footprint remain pending until their rail scores are properly researched. Select a category for sourced findings and transparent calculations.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
+14.3↓

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

+14.3
Capacity 25%
+55.0× 25%= +13.8 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Statistics Botswana released a 2024/25 labour-force brief in March 2026, following a Q1 2024 unemployment rate of 27.6%. The current labour programme confirms that employment access remains a major national burden despite substantial state and private productive capacity.

Reach 35%
+35.0× 35%= +12.3 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Statistics Botswana released a 2024/25 labour-force brief in March 2026, following a Q1 2024 unemployment rate of 27.6%. The current labour programme confirms that employment access remains a major national burden despite substantial state and private productive capacity.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-65.0× 25%= -16.3 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Statistics Botswana released a 2024/25 labour-force brief in March 2026, following a Q1 2024 unemployment rate of 27.6%. The current labour programme confirms that employment access remains a major national burden despite substantial state and private productive capacity.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Regeneration 15%
+30.0× 15%= +4.5 points
Exact point calculation

30.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Statistics Botswana released a 2024/25 labour-force brief in March 2026, following a Q1 2024 unemployment rate of 27.6%. The current labour programme confirms that employment access remains a major national burden despite substantial state and private productive capacity.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+14.3 Published category score+14.3 Contribution to national evidence score+1.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 12.25 + -16.25 + 4.50 = 14.25

Base: 14.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +14.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 14.25 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.46 points

This category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Botswana: Human Time & Burden Return research finding

Statistics Botswana released a 2024/25 labour-force brief in March 2026, following a Q1 2024 unemployment rate of 27.6%. The current labour programme confirms that employment access remains a major national burden despite substantial state and private productive capacity.

Statistics Botswana
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
+34.8↓

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

+34.8
Capacity 25%
+75.0× 25%= +18.8 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

The 2022 census shows widespread use of durable wall, floor and roof materials, but service quality and deprivation vary strongly by district. Housing structure capacity is substantial while universal household service reach is incomplete.

Reach 35%
+60.0× 35%= +21.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2022 census shows widespread use of durable wall, floor and roof materials, but service quality and deprivation vary strongly by district. Housing structure capacity is substantial while universal household service reach is incomplete.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-50.0× 25%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2022 census shows widespread use of durable wall, floor and roof materials, but service quality and deprivation vary strongly by district. Housing structure capacity is substantial while universal household service reach is incomplete.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Durability 15%
+50.0× 15%= +7.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2022 census shows widespread use of durable wall, floor and roof materials, but service quality and deprivation vary strongly by district. Housing structure capacity is substantial while universal household service reach is incomplete.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+34.8 Published category score+34.8 Contribution to national evidence score+3.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 21.00 + -12.50 + 7.50 = 34.75

Base: 34.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +34.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 34.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 3.16 points

This category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

Botswana: Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach research finding

The 2022 census shows widespread use of durable wall, floor and roof materials, but service quality and deprivation vary strongly by district. Housing structure capacity is substantial while universal household service reach is incomplete.

Statistics Botswana
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
+22.5↓

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

+22.5
Capacity 25%
+60.0× 25%= +15.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Botswana continues to import substantial food and beverages: in August 2025 these imports were P1.207 billion, 18.3% of total imports, with cereals prominent. Domestic land and livestock capacity therefore coexist with material import dependence.

Reach 35%
+45.0× 35%= +15.8 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Botswana continues to import substantial food and beverages: in August 2025 these imports were P1.207 billion, 18.3% of total imports, with cereals prominent. Domestic land and livestock capacity therefore coexist with material import dependence.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction / Waste 25%
-60.0× 25%= -15.0 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Botswana continues to import substantial food and beverages: in August 2025 these imports were P1.207 billion, 18.3% of total imports, with cereals prominent. Domestic land and livestock capacity therefore coexist with material import dependence.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Multiplication 15%
+45.0× 15%= +6.8 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Botswana continues to import substantial food and beverages: in August 2025 these imports were P1.207 billion, 18.3% of total imports, with cereals prominent. Domestic land and livestock capacity therefore coexist with material import dependence.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+22.5 Published category score+22.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 15.00 + 15.75 + -15.00 + 6.75 = 22.50

Base: 22.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +22.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 22.50 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.30 points

This category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

Botswana: Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance research finding

Botswana continues to import substantial food and beverages: in August 2025 these imports were P1.207 billion, 18.3% of total imports, with cereals prominent. Domestic land and livestock capacity therefore coexist with material import dependence.

Statistics Botswana
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
+21.0↓

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

+21.0
Capacity 25%
+55.0× 25%= +13.8 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

The 2022 census found 49.4% of households had flush toilets connected to sewer or septic systems, 40% used other toilet types, and 10.9% had no toilet. World Bank water investments have improved supply in drought-vulnerable areas, but aridity and territorial gaps remain fundamental constraints.

Reach 35%
+50.0× 35%= +17.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2022 census found 49.4% of households had flush toilets connected to sewer or septic systems, 40% used other toilet types, and 10.9% had no toilet. World Bank water investments have improved supply in drought-vulnerable areas, but aridity and territorial gaps remain fundamental constraints.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction / Loss 25%
-65.0× 25%= -16.3 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2022 census found 49.4% of households had flush toilets connected to sewer or septic systems, 40% used other toilet types, and 10.9% had no toilet. World Bank water investments have improved supply in drought-vulnerable areas, but aridity and territorial gaps remain fundamental constraints.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Regeneration 15%
+40.0× 15%= +6.0 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2022 census found 49.4% of households had flush toilets connected to sewer or septic systems, 40% used other toilet types, and 10.9% had no toilet. World Bank water investments have improved supply in drought-vulnerable areas, but aridity and territorial gaps remain fundamental constraints.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+21.0 Published category score+21.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 17.50 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 21.00

Base: 21.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +21.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 21.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.43 points

This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +5.0

What the evidence found

Botswana: Water & Sanitation Abundance research finding

The 2022 census found 49.4% of households had flush toilets connected to sewer or septic systems, 40% used other toilet types, and 10.9% had no toilet. World Bank water investments have improved supply in drought-vulnerable areas, but aridity and territorial gaps remain fundamental constraints.

Statistics Botswana
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
+27.3↓

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

+27.3
Capacity 25%
+65.0× 25%= +16.3 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Botswana has major solar potential and new utility-scale solar capacity, but its 2026 National Energy Compact says regional imports represented about 30% of distribution in the referenced period and some households still cannot afford internal wiring and appliances.

Reach 35%
+55.0× 35%= +19.3 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Botswana has major solar potential and new utility-scale solar capacity, but its 2026 National Energy Compact says regional imports represented about 30% of distribution in the referenced period and some households still cannot afford internal wiring and appliances.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-60.0× 25%= -15.0 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Botswana has major solar potential and new utility-scale solar capacity, but its 2026 National Energy Compact says regional imports represented about 30% of distribution in the referenced period and some households still cannot afford internal wiring and appliances.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Burden Removed 15%
+45.0× 15%= +6.8 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Botswana has major solar potential and new utility-scale solar capacity, but its 2026 National Energy Compact says regional imports represented about 30% of distribution in the referenced period and some households still cannot afford internal wiring and appliances.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+27.3 Published category score+27.3 Contribution to national evidence score+1.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 16.25 + 19.25 + -15.00 + 6.75 = 27.25

Base: 27.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 27.25 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.55 points

This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Botswana: Energy & Household Capability research finding

Botswana has major solar potential and new utility-scale solar capacity, but its 2026 National Energy Compact says regional imports represented about 30% of distribution in the referenced period and some households still cannot afford internal wiring and appliances.

World Bank
7% weight Health & Care Reach
+28.5↓

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

+28.5
Capacity 25%
+65.0× 25%= +16.3 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

WHO reports a UHC service-coverage index of 54, low out-of-pocket spending because of removed user fees, but also frequent medicine stock-outs, equipment-maintenance problems and service-quality gaps. Capacity and financial protection therefore coexist with delivery friction.

Reach 35%
+55.0× 35%= +19.3 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WHO reports a UHC service-coverage index of 54, low out-of-pocket spending because of removed user fees, but also frequent medicine stock-outs, equipment-maintenance problems and service-quality gaps. Capacity and financial protection therefore coexist with delivery friction.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-55.0× 25%= -13.8 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WHO reports a UHC service-coverage index of 54, low out-of-pocket spending because of removed user fees, but also frequent medicine stock-outs, equipment-maintenance problems and service-quality gaps. Capacity and financial protection therefore coexist with delivery friction.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Prevention 15%
+45.0× 15%= +6.8 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WHO reports a UHC service-coverage index of 54, low out-of-pocket spending because of removed user fees, but also frequent medicine stock-outs, equipment-maintenance problems and service-quality gaps. Capacity and financial protection therefore coexist with delivery friction.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+28.5 Published category score+28.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 16.25 + 19.25 + -13.75 + 6.75 = 28.50

Base: 28.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +28.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 28.50 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.27 points

This category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Botswana: Health & Care Reach research finding

WHO reports a UHC service-coverage index of 54, low out-of-pocket spending because of removed user fees, but also frequent medicine stock-outs, equipment-maintenance problems and service-quality gaps. Capacity and financial protection therefore coexist with delivery friction.

World Health Organization
6% weight Education & Human Capability
+35.5↓

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

+35.5
Capacity 25%
+75.0× 25%= +18.8 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Primary enrollment is about 98%, but UNICEF reports that roughly one-third of primary pupils fail to acquire basic literacy after four to five years and nearly two-thirds do not pass the Junior Certificate Examination. Reach is strong while learning outcomes remain uneven.

Reach 35%
+70.0× 35%= +24.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Primary enrollment is about 98%, but UNICEF reports that roughly one-third of primary pupils fail to acquire basic literacy after four to five years and nearly two-thirds do not pass the Junior Certificate Examination. Reach is strong while learning outcomes remain uneven.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-55.0× 25%= -13.8 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Primary enrollment is about 98%, but UNICEF reports that roughly one-third of primary pupils fail to acquire basic literacy after four to five years and nearly two-thirds do not pass the Junior Certificate Examination. Reach is strong while learning outcomes remain uneven.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Capability 15%
+40.0× 15%= +6.0 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Primary enrollment is about 98%, but UNICEF reports that roughly one-third of primary pupils fail to acquire basic literacy after four to five years and nearly two-thirds do not pass the Junior Certificate Examination. Reach is strong while learning outcomes remain uneven.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+35.5 Published category score+35.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 24.50 + -13.75 + 6.00 = 35.50

Base: 35.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 35.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.42 points

This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +5.0

What the evidence found

Botswana: Education & Human Capability research finding

Primary enrollment is about 98%, but UNICEF reports that roughly one-third of primary pupils fail to acquire basic literacy after four to five years and nearly two-thirds do not pass the Junior Certificate Examination. Reach is strong while learning outcomes remain uneven.

UNICEF Botswana
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
+27.8↓

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

+27.8
Capacity 25%
+65.0× 25%= +16.3 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Government information says major towns and villages are served by public transport and rail links connect Francistown, Gaborone and Lobatse; travel and car-hire services are explicitly paid. Large distances and rural settlement patterns continue to limit frictionless reach.

Reach 35%
+55.0× 35%= +19.3 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Government information says major towns and villages are served by public transport and rail links connect Francistown, Gaborone and Lobatse; travel and car-hire services are explicitly paid. Large distances and rural settlement patterns continue to limit frictionless reach.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-55.0× 25%= -13.8 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Government information says major towns and villages are served by public transport and rail links connect Francistown, Gaborone and Lobatse; travel and car-hire services are explicitly paid. Large distances and rural settlement patterns continue to limit frictionless reach.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Time 15%
+40.0× 15%= +6.0 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Government information says major towns and villages are served by public transport and rail links connect Francistown, Gaborone and Lobatse; travel and car-hire services are explicitly paid. Large distances and rural settlement patterns continue to limit frictionless reach.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+27.8 Published category score+27.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 16.25 + 19.25 + -13.75 + 6.00 = 27.75

Base: 27.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 27.75 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.26 points

This category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Botswana: Mobility & Reachability research finding

Government information says major towns and villages are served by public transport and rail links connect Francistown, Gaborone and Lobatse; travel and car-hire services are explicitly paid. Large distances and rural settlement patterns continue to limit frictionless reach.

Government of Botswana
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
+23.8↓

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

+23.8
Capacity 25%
+65.0× 25%= +16.3 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Botswana has extensive social and public-service capacity, yet UNICEF reports high multidimensional child poverty and the labour evidence records persistent employment barriers. The family score therefore recognizes public capacity without treating household security as universal.

Reach 35%
+45.0× 35%= +15.8 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Botswana has extensive social and public-service capacity, yet UNICEF reports high multidimensional child poverty and the labour evidence records persistent employment barriers. The family score therefore recognizes public capacity without treating household security as universal.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-60.0× 25%= -15.0 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Botswana has extensive social and public-service capacity, yet UNICEF reports high multidimensional child poverty and the labour evidence records persistent employment barriers. The family score therefore recognizes public capacity without treating household security as universal.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Continuity 15%
+45.0× 15%= +6.8 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Botswana has extensive social and public-service capacity, yet UNICEF reports high multidimensional child poverty and the labour evidence records persistent employment barriers. The family score therefore recognizes public capacity without treating household security as universal.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+23.8 Published category score+23.8 Contribution to national evidence score+2.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 16.25 + 15.75 + -15.00 + 6.75 = 23.75

Base: 23.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +23.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 23.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.16 points

This category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +23.8

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: +23.8 − 0 = +23.8 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Botswana: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded by the 2026-10-10 legal-status review. Government describes an active court challenge and an unchanged Marriage Act; future court outcome needs monitoring. This describes legal status, not a demonstrated effect on birth rates.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2026-10-10 (access date; verify publication date in linked source) · Reviewed: 2026-10-10

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Botswana: Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability research finding

Botswana has extensive social and public-service capacity, yet UNICEF reports high multidimensional child poverty and the labour evidence records persistent employment barriers. The family score therefore recognizes public capacity without treating household security as universal.

UNICEF Botswana
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
+41.5↓

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

+41.5
Capacity 25%
+95.0× 25%= +23.8 points
Exact point calculation

95.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 23.75 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Botswana has a vast land base and the 2022 census directly analyzes agricultural land ownership. Physical spatial capacity is unusually large, but access, use rights and productive water availability vary sharply by household and location.

Reach 35%
+55.0× 35%= +19.3 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Botswana has a vast land base and the 2022 census directly analyzes agricultural land ownership. Physical spatial capacity is unusually large, but access, use rights and productive water availability vary sharply by household and location.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction / Concentration 25%
-45.0× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Botswana has a vast land base and the 2022 census directly analyzes agricultural land ownership. Physical spatial capacity is unusually large, but access, use rights and productive water availability vary sharply by household and location.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Productive Ground 15%
+65.0× 15%= +9.8 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.75 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Botswana has a vast land base and the 2022 census directly analyzes agricultural land ownership. Physical spatial capacity is unusually large, but access, use rights and productive water availability vary sharply by household and location.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.5 Published category score+41.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 23.75 + 19.25 + -11.25 + 9.75 = 41.50

Base: 41.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.36 points

This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +40.0

What the evidence found

Botswana: Land Access & Spatial Freedom research finding

Botswana has a vast land base and the 2022 census directly analyzes agricultural land ownership. Physical spatial capacity is unusually large, but access, use rights and productive water availability vary sharply by household and location.

Statistics Botswana
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
+49.5↓

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

+49.5
Capacity 25%
+90.0× 25%= +22.5 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

About 40-42% of Botswana’s land is under conservation or wildlife-management status, including globally significant landscapes such as the Okavango Delta and Chobe. This is extraordinary beauty and open-land capacity, while access still depends on distance, infrastructure and paid tourism systems.

Reach 35%
+70.0× 35%= +24.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

About 40-42% of Botswana’s land is under conservation or wildlife-management status, including globally significant landscapes such as the Okavango Delta and Chobe. This is extraordinary beauty and open-land capacity, while access still depends on distance, infrastructure and paid tourism systems.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-35.0× 25%= -8.8 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

About 40-42% of Botswana’s land is under conservation or wildlife-management status, including globally significant landscapes such as the Okavango Delta and Chobe. This is extraordinary beauty and open-land capacity, while access still depends on distance, infrastructure and paid tourism systems.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Delight 15%
+75.0× 15%= +11.3 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

About 40-42% of Botswana’s land is under conservation or wildlife-management status, including globally significant landscapes such as the Okavango Delta and Chobe. This is extraordinary beauty and open-land capacity, while access still depends on distance, infrastructure and paid tourism systems.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+49.5 Published category score+49.5 Contribution to national evidence score+3.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 24.50 + -8.75 + 11.25 = 49.50

Base: 49.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +49.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 49.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 3.38 points

This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Botswana: Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight research finding

About 40-42% of Botswana’s land is under conservation or wildlife-management status, including globally significant landscapes such as the Okavango Delta and Chobe. This is extraordinary beauty and open-land capacity, while access still depends on distance, infrastructure and paid tourism systems.

Government of Botswana
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
+58.8↓

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

+58.8
Capacity 25%
+95.0× 25%= +23.8 points
Exact point calculation

95.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 23.75 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

More than 40% of Botswana’s land is reported under conservation management through parks, reserves, wildlife-management areas and community-managed zones. This is one of the strongest physical conservation bases in the batch, while aridity and human-wildlife pressures remain.

Reach / Ecological Function 35%
+85.0× 35%= +29.8 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 29.75 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

More than 40% of Botswana’s land is reported under conservation management through parks, reserves, wildlife-management areas and community-managed zones. This is one of the strongest physical conservation bases in the batch, while aridity and human-wildlife pressures remain.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction / Loss 25%
-30.0× 25%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

More than 40% of Botswana’s land is reported under conservation management through parks, reserves, wildlife-management areas and community-managed zones. This is one of the strongest physical conservation bases in the batch, while aridity and human-wildlife pressures remain.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Regeneration 15%
+85.0× 15%= +12.8 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 12.75 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

More than 40% of Botswana’s land is reported under conservation management through parks, reserves, wildlife-management areas and community-managed zones. This is one of the strongest physical conservation bases in the batch, while aridity and human-wildlife pressures remain.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+58.8 Published category score+58.8 Contribution to national evidence score+4.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 23.75 + 29.75 + -7.50 + 12.75 = 58.75

Base: 58.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +58.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 58.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 4.01 points

This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Botswana: Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience research finding

More than 40% of Botswana’s land is reported under conservation management through parks, reserves, wildlife-management areas and community-managed zones. This is one of the strongest physical conservation bases in the batch, while aridity and human-wildlife pressures remain.

Botswana DailyNews / Government of Botswana
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
+48.5↓

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

+48.5
Capacity 25%
+80.0× 25%= +20.0 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

The 2025 World Justice Project index places Botswana 50th of 143 and records a 1% improvement. The evidence supports meaningful institutional capacity while still documenting non-zero justice and rights frictions.

Reach 35%
+75.0× 35%= +26.3 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2025 World Justice Project index places Botswana 50th of 143 and records a 1% improvement. The evidence supports meaningful institutional capacity while still documenting non-zero justice and rights frictions.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-30.0× 25%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2025 World Justice Project index places Botswana 50th of 143 and records a 1% improvement. The evidence supports meaningful institutional capacity while still documenting non-zero justice and rights frictions.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Reliability 15%
+65.0× 15%= +9.8 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.75 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2025 World Justice Project index places Botswana 50th of 143 and records a 1% improvement. The evidence supports meaningful institutional capacity while still documenting non-zero justice and rights frictions.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+48.5 Published category score+48.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 26.25 + -7.50 + 9.75 = 48.50

Base: 48.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +48.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 48.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.76 points

This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +5.0

What the evidence found

Botswana: Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction research finding

The 2025 World Justice Project index places Botswana 50th of 143 and records a 1% improvement. The evidence supports meaningful institutional capacity while still documenting non-zero justice and rights frictions.

World Justice Project
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
+15.5↓

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

+15.5
Capacity 25%
+50.0× 25%= +12.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 12.50 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

The 2022 census found only about half of households had refuse collected regularly; burning, burying and dumping remained common. This is strong direct evidence that material-return infrastructure has not yet reached universal circularity.

Reach 35%
+40.0× 35%= +14.0 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.00 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2022 census found only about half of households had refuse collected regularly; burning, burying and dumping remained common. This is strong direct evidence that material-return infrastructure has not yet reached universal circularity.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction / Waste 25%
-65.0× 25%= -16.3 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2022 census found only about half of households had refuse collected regularly; burning, burying and dumping remained common. This is strong direct evidence that material-return infrastructure has not yet reached universal circularity.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Circularity 15%
+35.0× 15%= +5.3 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2022 census found only about half of households had refuse collected regularly; burning, burying and dumping remained common. This is strong direct evidence that material-return infrastructure has not yet reached universal circularity.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+15.5 Published category score+15.5 Contribution to national evidence score+0.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 12.50 + 14.00 + -16.25 + 5.25 = 15.50

Base: 15.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +15.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 15.50 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 0.70 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

This category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Botswana: Durability, Repair & Material Return research finding

The 2022 census found only about half of households had refuse collected regularly; burning, burying and dumping remained common. This is strong direct evidence that material-return infrastructure has not yet reached universal circularity.

Statistics Botswana
6% weight · research presentInternational Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending

The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.

Country findings and sources

Botswana: International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome research finding

Non-citizens seeking long-term residence must apply, provide documents and pay fees; employment also requires work/residence authorization. Botswana hosts refugees, including about 760 people in Dukwi camp, but international welcome remains formal and administratively gated.

Government of Botswana
6% weight · research presentExternal Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending

The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Exported waste / garbageAudit pending
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

Country findings and sources

Botswana: External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct research finding

Botswana’s economy and external trade are strongly connected to mineral exports and regional electricity/food flows. These material relationships are recorded factually here and remain unscored rather than being converted into a political or moral verdict.

Statistics Botswana

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.