Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Philippines 🇵🇭

Philippines currently ranks #101 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -61.47. This country is money-gated (3.75/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Education and weakest in Housing across 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Tracking baselineEvidence through 10 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-61.5
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: +29.8 · Money Gate: 3.75/20 · Headline: -61.5.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#101of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

PhilippinesLast recorded move: down from #91 to #101.Recent recorded movements
  1. #91 → #10120 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  2. #91 → #9420 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  3. #82 → #9120 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #77 → #8220 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 49: rank 141. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 49: rank 142. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 49: rank 142. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 9 Oct 2026 · 07:51 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 49: rank 137. 9 Oct 2026 · 12:04 GMT-0500 – 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 49: rank 138. 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 49: rank 139. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 49: rank 138. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 49: rank 117. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 49: rank 117. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 49: rank 116. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 49: rank 115. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 49: rank 106. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 49: rank 105. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 49: rank 104. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 49: rank 105. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 49: rank 106. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 49: rank 105. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 49: rank 106. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 49: rank 105. 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 49: rank 104. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 49: rank 103. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 49: rank 102. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 49: rank 101. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 49: rank 100. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 49: rank 99. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 49: rank 98. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 49: rank 97. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 49: rank 96. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 49: rank 95. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 49: rank 94. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 49: rank 93. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 49: rank 92. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 49: rank 91. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 49: rank 90. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 49: rank 89. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 49: rank 88. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 49: rank 87. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 49: rank 86. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 49: rank 85. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 49: rank 84. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 49: rank 83. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 49: rank 82. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 49: rank 81. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 49: rank 80. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 45 of 49: rank 79. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 46 of 49: rank 78. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 47 of 49: rank 82. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 48 of 49: rank 91. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 49 of 49: rank 94. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500SAVED #94CALC #101Oct 2026Oct 2026

Last archived rank #94 · Current calculated rank #101 The dated graph ends at the saved position. The current calculation has not yet been captured as a dated history point; it is not proof of a new score change.

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

97%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 76.0% + 6.0 × 76.0% = 97.12% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#36

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

0.5 / 4

Food

Why 0.5 / 4?

DepEd funds free meals for all public-school kindergarten learners, with targeted help for further age groups.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
0.8 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 0.8 / 4?

The New Agrarian Emancipation Act cancelled listed beneficiary agrarian loans on awarded land; targeted debt release is significant, not universal land access.

Point calculation

0.75 ÷ 4 × 100 = 18.75% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
2.5 / 4

Healthcare

Why 2.5 / 4?

The government expanded zero-balance billing to PhilHealth members admitted in basic or ward accommodation at DOH-retained hospitals; limitations apply.

Point calculation

2.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 62.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
0.0 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.0 / 4?

Even an officially announced 20% commuter fare discount leaves a fare for ordinary trips; universal free mobility not verified.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
0.0 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 0.0 / 4?

Water and electricity infrastructure reach remains incomplete in places and no countrywide no-payment tariff guarantee is documented.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
Money Gate score
  • Food0.5 / 4
  • Housing / Land0.8 / 4
  • Healthcare2.5 / 4
  • Transportation0.0 / 4
  • Water / Energy0.0 / 4
  • Money still needed16.3 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 3.8 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 0.50 + Housing / Land 0.75 + Healthcare 2.50 + Transportation 0.00 + Water / Energy 0.00 = 3.75 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
77.2 / 100
Why 77.2 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -54.32) ÷ 2 = 77.16 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-40.6
Why -40.6?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 3.75 = -40.6

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-66.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +14.0

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-66.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-52.5× 25%= -13.1 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -52.5 × 25% = -13.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Philippines, pSA reports 51.16 million people in the labor force in 2025, 4.2% unemployment and 11.9% underemployment. The 2025 FIES also shows food taking 33.3% of family expenditure, housing/utilities 21.6% and transport 6.9%, so household access still requires sustained cash production across several essentials.

For Philippines, pSA reports 51.16 million people in the labor force in 2025, 4.2% unemployment and 11.9% underemployment. The 2025 FIES also shows food taking 33.3% of family expenditure, housing/utilities 21.6% and transport 6.9%, so household access still requires sustained cash production across several essentials.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-59.9× 35%= -21.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -59.9 × 35% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, pSA reports 51.16 million people in the labor force in 2025, 4.2% unemployment and 11.9% underemployment. The 2025 FIES also shows food taking 33.3% of family expenditure, housing/utilities 21.6% and transport 6.9%, so household access still requires sustained cash production across several essentials.

For Philippines, pSA reports 51.16 million people in the labor force in 2025, 4.2% unemployment and 11.9% underemployment. The 2025 FIES also shows food taking 33.3% of family expenditure, housing/utilities 21.6% and transport 6.9%, so household access still requires sustained cash production across several essentials.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-89.6× 25%= -22.4 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -89.6 × 25% = -22.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, pSA reports 51.16 million people in the labor force in 2025, 4.2% unemployment and 11.9% underemployment. The 2025 FIES also shows food taking 33.3% of family expenditure, housing/utilities 21.6% and transport 6.9%, so household access still requires sustained cash production across several essentials.

For Philippines, pSA reports 51.16 million people in the labor force in 2025, 4.2% unemployment and 11.9% underemployment. The 2025 FIES also shows food taking 33.3% of family expenditure, housing/utilities 21.6% and transport 6.9%, so household access still requires sustained cash production across several essentials.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-64.4× 15%= -9.7 points
Exact point calculation

20.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.00 weighted points

Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -64.4 × 15% = -9.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, pSA reports 51.16 million people in the labor force in 2025, 4.2% unemployment and 11.9% underemployment. The 2025 FIES also shows food taking 33.3% of family expenditure, housing/utilities 21.6% and transport 6.9%, so household access still requires sustained cash production across several essentials.

For Philippines, pSA reports 51.16 million people in the labor force in 2025, 4.2% unemployment and 11.9% underemployment. The 2025 FIES also shows food taking 33.3% of family expenditure, housing/utilities 21.6% and transport 6.9%, so household access still requires sustained cash production across several essentials.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.13 + -20.97 + -22.40 + -9.66 = -66.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +14.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +14.0. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -66.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+14.0 Original evidence category score+14.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 15.00 + 12.25 + -16.25 + 3.00 = 14.00

Base: 14.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +14.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 14.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.30 points

For Philippines, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — human-time-burden domestic evidence retained

For Philippines, pSA reports 51.16 million people in the labor force in 2025, 4.2% unemployment and 11.9% underemployment. The 2025 FIES also shows food taking 33.3% of family expenditure, housing/utilities 21.6% and transport 6.9%, so household access still requires sustained cash production across several essentials.

2026-10-11 Philippine Statistics Authority — 2025 Annual Provincial Labor Market Statistics · Philippine Statistics Authority — 2025 Family Income and Expenditure Survey
Paid-work insecurity and household spending keep family time under pressure

For Philippines, pSA reports 51.16 million people in the labor force in 2025, 4.2% unemployment and 11.9% underemployment. The 2025 FIES also shows food taking 33.3% of family expenditure, housing/utilities 21.6% and transport 6.9%, so household access still requires sustained cash production across several essentials.

2026-10-05 Philippine Statistics Authority — 2025 Annual Provincial Labor Market Statistics · Philippine Statistics Authority — 2025 Family Income and Expenditure Survey
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-66.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence +13.0

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-66.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-52.5× 25%= -13.1 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -52.5 × 25% = -13.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, philippine housing research continues to document a large national housing shortage and an affordability mismatch, especially for low- and middle-income families. PIDS reports that affordable housing is pushed toward peripheral locations and that rising residential costs influence young adults to remain in extended and multifamily households.

For Philippines, philippine housing research continues to document a large national housing shortage and an affordability mismatch, especially for low- and middle-income families. PIDS reports that affordable housing is pushed toward peripheral locations and that rising residential costs influence young adults to remain in extended and multifamily households.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-59.9× 35%= -21.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.75/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -59.9 × 35% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Philippines, philippine housing research continues to document a large national housing shortage and an affordability mismatch, especially for low- and middle-income families. PIDS reports that affordable housing is pushed toward peripheral locations and that rising residential costs influence young adults to remain in extended and multifamily households.

For Philippines, philippine housing research continues to document a large national housing shortage and an affordability mismatch, especially for low- and middle-income families. PIDS reports that affordable housing is pushed toward peripheral locations and that rising residential costs influence young adults to remain in extended and multifamily households.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-92.6× 25%= -23.1 points
Exact point calculation

-75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -18.75 weighted points

Original evidence -75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -75.0; Money-gated reading -92.6 × 25% = -23.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, philippine housing research continues to document a large national housing shortage and an affordability mismatch, especially for low- and middle-income families. PIDS reports that affordable housing is pushed toward peripheral locations and that rising residential costs influence young adults to remain in extended and multifamily households.

For Philippines, philippine housing research continues to document a large national housing shortage and an affordability mismatch, especially for low- and middle-income families. PIDS reports that affordable housing is pushed toward peripheral locations and that rising residential costs influence young adults to remain in extended and multifamily households.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-61.4× 15%= -9.2 points
Exact point calculation

30.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points

Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -61.4 × 15% = -9.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, philippine housing research continues to document a large national housing shortage and an affordability mismatch, especially for low- and middle-income families. PIDS reports that affordable housing is pushed toward peripheral locations and that rising residential costs influence young adults to remain in extended and multifamily households.

For Philippines, philippine housing research continues to document a large national housing shortage and an affordability mismatch, especially for low- and middle-income families. PIDS reports that affordable housing is pushed toward peripheral locations and that rising residential costs influence young adults to remain in extended and multifamily households.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.13 + -20.97 + -23.14 + -9.22 = -66.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +13.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +13.0. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -66.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+13.0 Original evidence category score+13.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 15.00 + 12.25 + -18.75 + 4.50 = 13.00

Base: 13.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +13.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 13.00 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.07 points

For Philippines, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — housing-shelter-reach domestic evidence retained

For Philippines, philippine housing research continues to document a large national housing shortage and an affordability mismatch, especially for low- and middle-income families. PIDS reports that affordable housing is pushed toward peripheral locations and that rising residential costs influence young adults to remain in extended and multifamily households.

2026-10-11 Philippine Institute for Development Studies — Metro Manila housing affordability gap · PIDS — What drives extended and multifamily households
Large housing need and affordability mismatch constrain shelter reach

For Philippines, philippine housing research continues to document a large national housing shortage and an affordability mismatch, especially for low- and middle-income families. PIDS reports that affordable housing is pushed toward peripheral locations and that rising residential costs influence young adults to remain in extended and multifamily households.

2026-10-05 Philippine Institute for Development Studies — Metro Manila housing affordability gap · PIDS — What drives extended and multifamily households
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-61.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +31.0

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-61.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-48.1× 25%= -12.0 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -48.1 × 25% = -12.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, depEd expanded the School-Based Feeding Program so all public-school kindergarten learners receive free daily food, with hot meals and fortified foods reaching about 3.4 million kindergarten and nutritionally vulnerable Grade 1–6 learners in 2025. DSWD separately served more than 1.5 million young children through supplementary feeding. Yet food and non-alcoholic beverages still consumed 33.3% of family expenditure in 2025.

For Philippines, depEd expanded the School-Based Feeding Program so all public-school kindergarten learners receive free daily food, with hot meals and fortified foods reaching about 3.4 million kindergarten and nutritionally vulnerable Grade 1–6 learners in 2025. DSWD separately served more than 1.5 million young children through supplementary feeding. Yet food and non-alcoholic beverages still consumed 33.3% of family expenditure in 2025.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-54.0× 35%= -18.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -54.0 × 35% = -18.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, depEd expanded the School-Based Feeding Program so all public-school kindergarten learners receive free daily food, with hot meals and fortified foods reaching about 3.4 million kindergarten and nutritionally vulnerable Grade 1–6 learners in 2025. DSWD separately served more than 1.5 million young children through supplementary feeding. Yet food and non-alcoholic beverages still consumed 33.3% of family expenditure in 2025.

For Philippines, depEd expanded the School-Based Feeding Program so all public-school kindergarten learners receive free daily food, with hot meals and fortified foods reaching about 3.4 million kindergarten and nutritionally vulnerable Grade 1–6 learners in 2025. DSWD separately served more than 1.5 million young children through supplementary feeding. Yet food and non-alcoholic beverages still consumed 33.3% of family expenditure in 2025.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-86.6× 25%= -21.7 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -86.6 × 25% = -21.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Philippines, depEd expanded the School-Based Feeding Program so all public-school kindergarten learners receive free daily food, with hot meals and fortified foods reaching about 3.4 million kindergarten and nutritionally vulnerable Grade 1–6 learners in 2025. DSWD separately served more than 1.5 million young children through supplementary feeding. Yet food and non-alcoholic beverages still consumed 33.3% of family expenditure in 2025.

For Philippines, depEd expanded the School-Based Feeding Program so all public-school kindergarten learners receive free daily food, with hot meals and fortified foods reaching about 3.4 million kindergarten and nutritionally vulnerable Grade 1–6 learners in 2025. DSWD separately served more than 1.5 million young children through supplementary feeding. Yet food and non-alcoholic beverages still consumed 33.3% of family expenditure in 2025.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.0× 15%= -8.5 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -57.0 × 15% = -8.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, depEd expanded the School-Based Feeding Program so all public-school kindergarten learners receive free daily food, with hot meals and fortified foods reaching about 3.4 million kindergarten and nutritionally vulnerable Grade 1–6 learners in 2025. DSWD separately served more than 1.5 million young children through supplementary feeding. Yet food and non-alcoholic beverages still consumed 33.3% of family expenditure in 2025.

For Philippines, depEd expanded the School-Based Feeding Program so all public-school kindergarten learners receive free daily food, with hot meals and fortified foods reaching about 3.4 million kindergarten and nutritionally vulnerable Grade 1–6 learners in 2025. DSWD separately served more than 1.5 million young children through supplementary feeding. Yet food and non-alcoholic beverages still consumed 33.3% of family expenditure in 2025.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.01 + -18.90 + -21.66 + -8.54 = -61.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +31.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +31.0. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -61.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+31.0 Original evidence category score+31.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 19.25 + -13.75 + 6.75 = 31.00

Base: 31.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +31.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 31.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.87 points

For Philippines, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — food-nourishment-free-food domestic evidence retained

For Philippines, depEd expanded the School-Based Feeding Program so all public-school kindergarten learners receive free daily food, with hot meals and fortified foods reaching about 3.4 million kindergarten and nutritionally vulnerable Grade 1–6 learners in 2025. DSWD separately served more than 1.5 million young children through supplementary feeding. Yet food and non-alcoholic beverages still consumed 33.3% of family expenditure in 2025.

2026-10-11 Department of Education — expanded School-Based Feeding Program · DSWD — Over 1.5M children benefit from feeding program in 2025
Millions of children receive free meals, while household food remains the largest spending burden

For Philippines, depEd expanded the School-Based Feeding Program so all public-school kindergarten learners receive free daily food, with hot meals and fortified foods reaching about 3.4 million kindergarten and nutritionally vulnerable Grade 1–6 learners in 2025. DSWD separately served more than 1.5 million young children through supplementary feeding. Yet food and non-alcoholic beverages still consumed 33.3% of family expenditure in 2025.

2026-10-05 Department of Education — expanded School-Based Feeding Program · DSWD — Over 1.5M children benefit from feeding program in 2025
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-58.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +39.5

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-58.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-48.1× 25%= -12.0 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -48.1 × 25% = -12.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, pSA reports 97.5% of families had at least basic drinking-water service in 2024, but only 53.1% had safely managed drinking water. Basic sanitation reached 84.7%, while 2.6% practiced open defecation; safely managed water ranged from 85.5% in NCR to 14.8% in BARMM.

For Philippines, pSA reports 97.5% of families had at least basic drinking-water service in 2024, but only 53.1% had safely managed drinking water. Basic sanitation reached 84.7%, while 2.6% practiced open defecation; safely managed water ranged from 85.5% in NCR to 14.8% in BARMM.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-51.0× 35%= -17.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -51.0 × 35% = -17.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, pSA reports 97.5% of families had at least basic drinking-water service in 2024, but only 53.1% had safely managed drinking water. Basic sanitation reached 84.7%, while 2.6% practiced open defecation; safely managed water ranged from 85.5% in NCR to 14.8% in BARMM.

For Philippines, pSA reports 97.5% of families had at least basic drinking-water service in 2024, but only 53.1% had safely managed drinking water. Basic sanitation reached 84.7%, while 2.6% practiced open defecation; safely managed water ranged from 85.5% in NCR to 14.8% in BARMM.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.7× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -80.7 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, pSA reports 97.5% of families had at least basic drinking-water service in 2024, but only 53.1% had safely managed drinking water. Basic sanitation reached 84.7%, while 2.6% practiced open defecation; safely managed water ranged from 85.5% in NCR to 14.8% in BARMM.

For Philippines, pSA reports 97.5% of families had at least basic drinking-water service in 2024, but only 53.1% had safely managed drinking water. Basic sanitation reached 84.7%, while 2.6% practiced open defecation; safely managed water ranged from 85.5% in NCR to 14.8% in BARMM.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.0× 15%= -8.5 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -57.0 × 15% = -8.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Philippines, pSA reports 97.5% of families had at least basic drinking-water service in 2024, but only 53.1% had safely managed drinking water. Basic sanitation reached 84.7%, while 2.6% practiced open defecation; safely managed water ranged from 85.5% in NCR to 14.8% in BARMM.

For Philippines, pSA reports 97.5% of families had at least basic drinking-water service in 2024, but only 53.1% had safely managed drinking water. Basic sanitation reached 84.7%, while 2.6% practiced open defecation; safely managed water ranged from 85.5% in NCR to 14.8% in BARMM.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.01 + -17.86 + -20.18 + -8.54 = -58.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +39.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +39.5. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+39.5 Original evidence category score+39.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 22.75 + -8.75 + 6.75 = 39.50

Base: 39.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +39.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 39.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.44 points

For Philippines, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — water-sanitation domestic evidence retained

For Philippines, pSA reports 97.5% of families had at least basic drinking-water service in 2024, but only 53.1% had safely managed drinking water. Basic sanitation reached 84.7%, while 2.6% practiced open defecation; safely managed water ranged from 85.5% in NCR to 14.8% in BARMM.

2026-10-11 Philippine Statistics Authority — 2024 Annual Poverty Indicators Survey WASH
Basic water reach is high but safely managed service and sanitation remain uneven

For Philippines, pSA reports 97.5% of families had at least basic drinking-water service in 2024, but only 53.1% had safely managed drinking water. Basic sanitation reached 84.7%, while 2.6% practiced open defecation; safely managed water ranged from 85.5% in NCR to 14.8% in BARMM.

2026-10-05 Philippine Statistics Authority — 2024 Annual Poverty Indicators Survey WASH
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-58.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence +40.0

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-58.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-46.6× 25%= -11.6 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -46.6 × 25% = -11.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Philippines, pSA reports 94.8% of households used electricity in 2023. In 2026 the Energy Regulatory Commission created a uniform national lifeline program with a 100% discount for qualified marginalized consumers using 50 kWh or less per month. The benefit is important zero-money reach for eligible low-use households, but ordinary electricity access remains tariff-based.

For Philippines, pSA reports 94.8% of households used electricity in 2023. In 2026 the Energy Regulatory Commission created a uniform national lifeline program with a 100% discount for qualified marginalized consumers using 50 kWh or less per month. The benefit is important zero-money reach for eligible low-use households, but ordinary electricity access remains tariff-based.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.5× 35%= -17.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -49.5 × 35% = -17.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, pSA reports 94.8% of households used electricity in 2023. In 2026 the Energy Regulatory Commission created a uniform national lifeline program with a 100% discount for qualified marginalized consumers using 50 kWh or less per month. The benefit is important zero-money reach for eligible low-use households, but ordinary electricity access remains tariff-based.

For Philippines, pSA reports 94.8% of households used electricity in 2023. In 2026 the Energy Regulatory Commission created a uniform national lifeline program with a 100% discount for qualified marginalized consumers using 50 kWh or less per month. The benefit is important zero-money reach for eligible low-use households, but ordinary electricity access remains tariff-based.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.7× 25%= -20.9 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.7 × 25% = -20.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, pSA reports 94.8% of households used electricity in 2023. In 2026 the Energy Regulatory Commission created a uniform national lifeline program with a 100% discount for qualified marginalized consumers using 50 kWh or less per month. The benefit is important zero-money reach for eligible low-use households, but ordinary electricity access remains tariff-based.

For Philippines, pSA reports 94.8% of households used electricity in 2023. In 2026 the Energy Regulatory Commission created a uniform national lifeline program with a 100% discount for qualified marginalized consumers using 50 kWh or less per month. The benefit is important zero-money reach for eligible low-use households, but ordinary electricity access remains tariff-based.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.0× 15%= -8.5 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -57.0 × 15% = -8.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, pSA reports 94.8% of households used electricity in 2023. In 2026 the Energy Regulatory Commission created a uniform national lifeline program with a 100% discount for qualified marginalized consumers using 50 kWh or less per month. The benefit is important zero-money reach for eligible low-use households, but ordinary electricity access remains tariff-based.

For Philippines, pSA reports 94.8% of households used electricity in 2023. In 2026 the Energy Regulatory Commission created a uniform national lifeline program with a 100% discount for qualified marginalized consumers using 50 kWh or less per month. The benefit is important zero-money reach for eligible low-use households, but ordinary electricity access remains tariff-based.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.64 + -17.34 + -20.92 + -8.54 = -58.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +40.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +40.0. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+40.0 Original evidence category score+40.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 24.50 + -11.25 + 6.75 = 40.00

Base: 40.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +40.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 40.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.06 points

For Philippines, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — energy-household-capability domestic evidence retained

For Philippines, pSA reports 94.8% of households used electricity in 2023. In 2026 the Energy Regulatory Commission created a uniform national lifeline program with a 100% discount for qualified marginalized consumers using 50 kWh or less per month. The benefit is important zero-money reach for eligible low-use households, but ordinary electricity access remains tariff-based.

2026-10-11 Philippine Statistics Authority — 2023 Household Energy Consumption Survey · Energy Regulatory Commission — Uniform National Lifeline Subsidy
Electricity use is broad, with targeted zero-bill lifeline support rather than universal free energy

For Philippines, pSA reports 94.8% of households used electricity in 2023. In 2026 the Energy Regulatory Commission created a uniform national lifeline program with a 100% discount for qualified marginalized consumers using 50 kWh or less per month. The benefit is important zero-money reach for eligible low-use households, but ordinary electricity access remains tariff-based.

2026-10-05 Philippine Statistics Authority — 2023 Household Energy Consumption Survey · Energy Regulatory Commission — Uniform National Lifeline Subsidy
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-58.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +41.0

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-58.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-48.1× 25%= -12.0 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -48.1 × 25% = -12.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, the 2025 Zero Balance Billing policy covers all PhilHealth members admitted to basic or ward accommodation in DOH-retained hospitals, and PhilHealth expanded outpatient, emergency and major disease packages. This creates substantial point-of-use relief, while the need for insurance eligibility, facility limits and continuing private/out-of-pocket spending means health is not universally money-free.

For Philippines, the 2025 Zero Balance Billing policy covers all PhilHealth members admitted to basic or ward accommodation in DOH-retained hospitals, and PhilHealth expanded outpatient, emergency and major disease packages. This creates substantial point-of-use relief, while the need for insurance eligibility, facility limits and continuing private/out-of-pocket spending means health is not universally money-free.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.5× 35%= -17.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 2.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -49.5 × 35% = -17.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Philippines, the 2025 Zero Balance Billing policy covers all PhilHealth members admitted to basic or ward accommodation in DOH-retained hospitals, and PhilHealth expanded outpatient, emergency and major disease packages. This creates substantial point-of-use relief, while the need for insurance eligibility, facility limits and continuing private/out-of-pocket spending means health is not universally money-free.

For Philippines, the 2025 Zero Balance Billing policy covers all PhilHealth members admitted to basic or ward accommodation in DOH-retained hospitals, and PhilHealth expanded outpatient, emergency and major disease packages. This creates substantial point-of-use relief, while the need for insurance eligibility, facility limits and continuing private/out-of-pocket spending means health is not universally money-free.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.7× 25%= -20.9 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.7 × 25% = -20.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, the 2025 Zero Balance Billing policy covers all PhilHealth members admitted to basic or ward accommodation in DOH-retained hospitals, and PhilHealth expanded outpatient, emergency and major disease packages. This creates substantial point-of-use relief, while the need for insurance eligibility, facility limits and continuing private/out-of-pocket spending means health is not universally money-free.

For Philippines, the 2025 Zero Balance Billing policy covers all PhilHealth members admitted to basic or ward accommodation in DOH-retained hospitals, and PhilHealth expanded outpatient, emergency and major disease packages. This creates substantial point-of-use relief, while the need for insurance eligibility, facility limits and continuing private/out-of-pocket spending means health is not universally money-free.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-52.5× 15%= -7.9 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -52.5 × 15% = -7.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, the 2025 Zero Balance Billing policy covers all PhilHealth members admitted to basic or ward accommodation in DOH-retained hospitals, and PhilHealth expanded outpatient, emergency and major disease packages. This creates substantial point-of-use relief, while the need for insurance eligibility, facility limits and continuing private/out-of-pocket spending means health is not universally money-free.

For Philippines, the 2025 Zero Balance Billing policy covers all PhilHealth members admitted to basic or ward accommodation in DOH-retained hospitals, and PhilHealth expanded outpatient, emergency and major disease packages. This creates substantial point-of-use relief, while the need for insurance eligibility, facility limits and continuing private/out-of-pocket spending means health is not universally money-free.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.01 + -17.34 + -20.92 + -7.87 = -58.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +41.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +41.0. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.0 Original evidence category score+41.0 Contribution to national evidence score+3.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 24.50 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 41.00

Base: 41.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.00 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.96 points

For Philippines, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +5.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — health-care-reach domestic evidence retained

For Philippines, the 2025 Zero Balance Billing policy covers all PhilHealth members admitted to basic or ward accommodation in DOH-retained hospitals, and PhilHealth expanded outpatient, emergency and major disease packages. This creates substantial point-of-use relief, while the need for insurance eligibility, facility limits and continuing private/out-of-pocket spending means health is not universally money-free.

2026-10-11 Department of Finance — Zero Balance Billing and PhilHealth expansion · WHO — 2025 global UHC monitoring report
Zero Balance Billing materially expands free hospital reach, but health costs have not disappeared

For Philippines, the 2025 Zero Balance Billing policy covers all PhilHealth members admitted to basic or ward accommodation in DOH-retained hospitals, and PhilHealth expanded outpatient, emergency and major disease packages. This creates substantial point-of-use relief, while the need for insurance eligibility, facility limits and continuing private/out-of-pocket spending means health is not universally money-free.

2026-10-05 Department of Finance — Zero Balance Billing and PhilHealth expansion · WHO — 2025 global UHC monitoring report
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-55.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +50.8

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-55.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-45.1× 25%= -11.3 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -45.1 × 25% = -11.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, philippine law guarantees free public secondary education, while the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education framework exempts eligible students in state universities and recognized local universities from tuition and other school fees. A 2025 CHED update continues Free Higher Education coverage and related assistance, although living costs, supplies, private education and access quality remain unequal.

For Philippines, philippine law guarantees free public secondary education, while the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education framework exempts eligible students in state universities and recognized local universities from tuition and other school fees. A 2025 CHED update continues Free Higher Education coverage and related assistance, although living costs, supplies, private education and access quality remain unequal.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-46.6× 35%= -16.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

80.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 28.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -46.6 × 35% = -16.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Philippines, philippine law guarantees free public secondary education, while the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education framework exempts eligible students in state universities and recognized local universities from tuition and other school fees. A 2025 CHED update continues Free Higher Education coverage and related assistance, although living costs, supplies, private education and access quality remain unequal.

For Philippines, philippine law guarantees free public secondary education, while the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education framework exempts eligible students in state universities and recognized local universities from tuition and other school fees. A 2025 CHED update continues Free Higher Education coverage and related assistance, although living costs, supplies, private education and access quality remain unequal.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-79.2× 25%= -19.8 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.0; Money-gated reading -79.2 × 25% = -19.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, philippine law guarantees free public secondary education, while the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education framework exempts eligible students in state universities and recognized local universities from tuition and other school fees. A 2025 CHED update continues Free Higher Education coverage and related assistance, although living costs, supplies, private education and access quality remain unequal.

For Philippines, philippine law guarantees free public secondary education, while the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education framework exempts eligible students in state universities and recognized local universities from tuition and other school fees. A 2025 CHED update continues Free Higher Education coverage and related assistance, although living costs, supplies, private education and access quality remain unequal.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-52.5× 15%= -7.9 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -52.5 × 15% = -7.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, philippine law guarantees free public secondary education, while the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education framework exempts eligible students in state universities and recognized local universities from tuition and other school fees. A 2025 CHED update continues Free Higher Education coverage and related assistance, although living costs, supplies, private education and access quality remain unequal.

For Philippines, philippine law guarantees free public secondary education, while the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education framework exempts eligible students in state universities and recognized local universities from tuition and other school fees. A 2025 CHED update continues Free Higher Education coverage and related assistance, although living costs, supplies, private education and access quality remain unequal.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.27 + -16.30 + -19.81 + -7.87 = -55.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +50.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +50.8. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -55.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+50.8 Original evidence category score+50.8 Contribution to national evidence score+3.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 28.00 + -7.50 + 9.00 = 50.75

Base: 50.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +50.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 50.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 3.14 points

For Philippines, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +5.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — education-human-capability domestic evidence retained

For Philippines, philippine law guarantees free public secondary education, while the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education framework exempts eligible students in state universities and recognized local universities from tuition and other school fees. A 2025 CHED update continues Free Higher Education coverage and related assistance, although living costs, supplies, private education and access quality remain unequal.

2026-10-11 LawPhil — Republic Act 6655 Free Public Secondary Education · Commission on Higher Education — Free Higher Education 2025
Free public basic education and free public tertiary tuition create unusually broad non-market learning routes

For Philippines, philippine law guarantees free public secondary education, while the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education framework exempts eligible students in state universities and recognized local universities from tuition and other school fees. A 2025 CHED update continues Free Higher Education coverage and related assistance, although living costs, supplies, private education and access quality remain unequal.

2026-10-05 LawPhil — Republic Act 6655 Free Public Secondary Education · Commission on Higher Education — Free Higher Education 2025
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-63.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence +24.8

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-63.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-51.0× 25%= -12.8 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -51.0 × 25% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, in April 2026 the government ordered a 20% fare discount through the service-contracting program, expected to benefit about 15 million commuters, while students, seniors and PWDs receive additional discounts and some temporary free-ride services have operated. Family expenditure data still assigns 6.9% of annual spending to transport, so mobility remains substantially cash-gated.

For Philippines, in April 2026 the government ordered a 20% fare discount through the service-contracting program, expected to benefit about 15 million commuters, while students, seniors and PWDs receive additional discounts and some temporary free-ride services have operated. Family expenditure data still assigns 6.9% of annual spending to transport, so mobility remains substantially cash-gated.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-55.5× 35%= -19.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -55.5 × 35% = -19.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Philippines, in April 2026 the government ordered a 20% fare discount through the service-contracting program, expected to benefit about 15 million commuters, while students, seniors and PWDs receive additional discounts and some temporary free-ride services have operated. Family expenditure data still assigns 6.9% of annual spending to transport, so mobility remains substantially cash-gated.

For Philippines, in April 2026 the government ordered a 20% fare discount through the service-contracting program, expected to benefit about 15 million commuters, while students, seniors and PWDs receive additional discounts and some temporary free-ride services have operated. Family expenditure data still assigns 6.9% of annual spending to transport, so mobility remains substantially cash-gated.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-88.1× 25%= -22.0 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -88.1 × 25% = -22.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, in April 2026 the government ordered a 20% fare discount through the service-contracting program, expected to benefit about 15 million commuters, while students, seniors and PWDs receive additional discounts and some temporary free-ride services have operated. Family expenditure data still assigns 6.9% of annual spending to transport, so mobility remains substantially cash-gated.

For Philippines, in April 2026 the government ordered a 20% fare discount through the service-contracting program, expected to benefit about 15 million commuters, while students, seniors and PWDs receive additional discounts and some temporary free-ride services have operated. Family expenditure data still assigns 6.9% of annual spending to transport, so mobility remains substantially cash-gated.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-58.4× 15%= -8.8 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -58.4 × 15% = -8.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, in April 2026 the government ordered a 20% fare discount through the service-contracting program, expected to benefit about 15 million commuters, while students, seniors and PWDs receive additional discounts and some temporary free-ride services have operated. Family expenditure data still assigns 6.9% of annual spending to transport, so mobility remains substantially cash-gated.

For Philippines, in April 2026 the government ordered a 20% fare discount through the service-contracting program, expected to benefit about 15 million commuters, while students, seniors and PWDs receive additional discounts and some temporary free-ride services have operated. Family expenditure data still assigns 6.9% of annual spending to transport, so mobility remains substantially cash-gated.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.75 + -19.42 + -22.03 + -8.77 = -63.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +24.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +24.8. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+24.8 Original evidence category score+24.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 16.25 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 6.00 = 24.75

Base: 24.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +24.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 24.75 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.02 points

For Philippines, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — mobility-reachability domestic evidence retained

For Philippines, in April 2026 the government ordered a 20% fare discount through the service-contracting program, expected to benefit about 15 million commuters, while students, seniors and PWDs receive additional discounts and some temporary free-ride services have operated. Family expenditure data still assigns 6.9% of annual spending to transport, so mobility remains substantially cash-gated.

2026-10-11 Philippine Information Agency — 20% fare discount for commuters · Philippine Statistics Authority — 2025 Family Income and Expenditure Survey
Nationwide fare relief lowers transport pressure but everyday movement is still paid

For Philippines, in April 2026 the government ordered a 20% fare discount through the service-contracting program, expected to benefit about 15 million commuters, while students, seniors and PWDs receive additional discounts and some temporary free-ride services have operated. Family expenditure data still assigns 6.9% of annual spending to transport, so mobility remains substantially cash-gated.

2026-10-05 Philippine Information Agency — 20% fare discount for commuters · Philippine Statistics Authority — 2025 Family Income and Expenditure Survey
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-65.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +17.8

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-65.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-52.5× 25%= -13.1 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -52.5 × 25% = -13.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Philippines, the 2025 National Demographic and Health Survey places total fertility at 1.7 children per woman, down from 4.1 in 1993, with urban fertility at 1.5. PIDS separately links housing affordability to delayed independent household formation and increased extended or multifamily living among young adults.

For Philippines, the 2025 National Demographic and Health Survey places total fertility at 1.7 children per woman, down from 4.1 in 1993, with urban fertility at 1.5. PIDS separately links housing affordability to delayed independent household formation and increased extended or multifamily living among young adults.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-57.0× 35%= -19.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -57.0 × 35% = -19.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, the 2025 National Demographic and Health Survey places total fertility at 1.7 children per woman, down from 4.1 in 1993, with urban fertility at 1.5. PIDS separately links housing affordability to delayed independent household formation and increased extended or multifamily living among young adults.

For Philippines, the 2025 National Demographic and Health Survey places total fertility at 1.7 children per woman, down from 4.1 in 1993, with urban fertility at 1.5. PIDS separately links housing affordability to delayed independent household formation and increased extended or multifamily living among young adults.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-91.1× 25%= -22.8 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Original evidence -70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -91.1 × 25% = -22.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, the 2025 National Demographic and Health Survey places total fertility at 1.7 children per woman, down from 4.1 in 1993, with urban fertility at 1.5. PIDS separately links housing affordability to delayed independent household formation and increased extended or multifamily living among young adults.

For Philippines, the 2025 National Demographic and Health Survey places total fertility at 1.7 children per woman, down from 4.1 in 1993, with urban fertility at 1.5. PIDS separately links housing affordability to delayed independent household formation and increased extended or multifamily living among young adults.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-61.4× 15%= -9.2 points
Exact point calculation

30.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points

Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -61.4 × 15% = -9.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, the 2025 National Demographic and Health Survey places total fertility at 1.7 children per woman, down from 4.1 in 1993, with urban fertility at 1.5. PIDS separately links housing affordability to delayed independent household formation and increased extended or multifamily living among young adults.

For Philippines, the 2025 National Demographic and Health Survey places total fertility at 1.7 children per woman, down from 4.1 in 1993, with urban fertility at 1.5. PIDS separately links housing affordability to delayed independent household formation and increased extended or multifamily living among young adults.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.13 + -19.93 + -22.77 + -9.22 = -65.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +17.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +17.8. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -65.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+17.8 Original evidence category score+17.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 15.00 + 15.75 + -17.50 + 4.50 = 17.75

Base: 17.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +17.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 17.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.46 points

For Philippines, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +17.8

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: +17.8 − 0 = +17.8 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Family Code Executive Order 209 Art. 1 defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman. This is a legal-status finding, not a measured effect on fertility.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 1987-07-06 · Reviewed: 2026-10-09

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — family-formation-stability domestic evidence retained

For Philippines, the 2025 National Demographic and Health Survey places total fertility at 1.7 children per woman, down from 4.1 in 1993, with urban fertility at 1.5. PIDS separately links housing affordability to delayed independent household formation and increased extended or multifamily living among young adults.

2026-10-11 Philippine Statistics Authority — 2025 National Demographic and Health Survey · PIDS — extended and multifamily household formation
Fertility has fallen sharply as housing and household-cost pressure persists

For Philippines, the 2025 National Demographic and Health Survey places total fertility at 1.7 children per woman, down from 4.1 in 1993, with urban fertility at 1.5. PIDS separately links housing affordability to delayed independent household formation and increased extended or multifamily living among young adults.

2026-10-05 Philippine Statistics Authority — 2025 National Demographic and Health Survey · PIDS — extended and multifamily household formation
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-63.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +22.3

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-63.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-51.0× 25%= -12.8 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -51.0 × 25% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, the Department of Agrarian Reform accelerated e-title and CLOA distribution, with government reporting a record 199,838 land titles distributed in 2025. Agrarian reform creates a real non-market land-access route for qualified landless farmers, but it is targeted and does not make secure residential or productive land generally free from purchase, rent or financing.

For Philippines, the Department of Agrarian Reform accelerated e-title and CLOA distribution, with government reporting a record 199,838 land titles distributed in 2025. Agrarian reform creates a real non-market land-access route for qualified landless farmers, but it is targeted and does not make secure residential or productive land generally free from purchase, rent or financing.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-58.4× 35%= -20.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.75/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

40.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -58.4 × 35% = -20.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Philippines, the Department of Agrarian Reform accelerated e-title and CLOA distribution, with government reporting a record 199,838 land titles distributed in 2025. Agrarian reform creates a real non-market land-access route for qualified landless farmers, but it is targeted and does not make secure residential or productive land generally free from purchase, rent or financing.

For Philippines, the Department of Agrarian Reform accelerated e-title and CLOA distribution, with government reporting a record 199,838 land titles distributed in 2025. Agrarian reform creates a real non-market land-access route for qualified landless farmers, but it is targeted and does not make secure residential or productive land generally free from purchase, rent or financing.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-89.6× 25%= -22.4 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -89.6 × 25% = -22.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, the Department of Agrarian Reform accelerated e-title and CLOA distribution, with government reporting a record 199,838 land titles distributed in 2025. Agrarian reform creates a real non-market land-access route for qualified landless farmers, but it is targeted and does not make secure residential or productive land generally free from purchase, rent or financing.

For Philippines, the Department of Agrarian Reform accelerated e-title and CLOA distribution, with government reporting a record 199,838 land titles distributed in 2025. Agrarian reform creates a real non-market land-access route for qualified landless farmers, but it is targeted and does not make secure residential or productive land generally free from purchase, rent or financing.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-54.0× 15%= -8.1 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -54.0 × 15% = -8.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, the Department of Agrarian Reform accelerated e-title and CLOA distribution, with government reporting a record 199,838 land titles distributed in 2025. Agrarian reform creates a real non-market land-access route for qualified landless farmers, but it is targeted and does not make secure residential or productive land generally free from purchase, rent or financing.

For Philippines, the Department of Agrarian Reform accelerated e-title and CLOA distribution, with government reporting a record 199,838 land titles distributed in 2025. Agrarian reform creates a real non-market land-access route for qualified landless farmers, but it is targeted and does not make secure residential or productive land generally free from purchase, rent or financing.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.75 + -20.45 + -22.40 + -8.11 = -63.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +22.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +22.3. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+22.3 Original evidence category score+22.3 Contribution to national evidence score+1.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 16.25 + 14.00 + -16.25 + 8.25 = 22.25

Base: 22.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +22.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 22.25 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.15 points

For Philippines, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — land-spatial-freedom domestic evidence retained

For Philippines, the Department of Agrarian Reform accelerated e-title and CLOA distribution, with government reporting a record 199,838 land titles distributed in 2025. Agrarian reform creates a real non-market land-access route for qualified landless farmers, but it is targeted and does not make secure residential or productive land generally free from purchase, rent or financing.

2026-10-11 Department of Agrarian Reform — agrarian reform mandate and services · House of Representatives — 2025 land title distribution record
Agrarian reform transfers land and removes debt for beneficiaries, but broad spatial access remains constrained

For Philippines, the Department of Agrarian Reform accelerated e-title and CLOA distribution, with government reporting a record 199,838 land titles distributed in 2025. Agrarian reform creates a real non-market land-access route for qualified landless farmers, but it is targeted and does not make secure residential or productive land generally free from purchase, rent or financing.

2026-10-05 Department of Agrarian Reform — agrarian reform mandate and services · House of Representatives — 2025 land title distribution record
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-57.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +41.8

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-57.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-48.1× 25%= -12.0 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -48.1 × 25% = -12.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, philippine law grants the general public free admission to public museums, national historical shrines and landmarks subject to capacity, and National Museum visitor guidance continues free admission. National Arts Month also includes free tours, screenings, workshops and public cultural activity. These are meaningful free-life routes, though much commercial entertainment remains subscription or ticket based.

For Philippines, philippine law grants the general public free admission to public museums, national historical shrines and landmarks subject to capacity, and National Museum visitor guidance continues free admission. National Arts Month also includes free tours, screenings, workshops and public cultural activity. These are meaningful free-life routes, though much commercial entertainment remains subscription or ticket based.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-51.0× 35%= -17.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -51.0 × 35% = -17.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Philippines, philippine law grants the general public free admission to public museums, national historical shrines and landmarks subject to capacity, and National Museum visitor guidance continues free admission. National Arts Month also includes free tours, screenings, workshops and public cultural activity. These are meaningful free-life routes, though much commercial entertainment remains subscription or ticket based.

For Philippines, philippine law grants the general public free admission to public museums, national historical shrines and landmarks subject to capacity, and National Museum visitor guidance continues free admission. National Arts Month also includes free tours, screenings, workshops and public cultural activity. These are meaningful free-life routes, though much commercial entertainment remains subscription or ticket based.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-80.7× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -80.7 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, philippine law grants the general public free admission to public museums, national historical shrines and landmarks subject to capacity, and National Museum visitor guidance continues free admission. National Arts Month also includes free tours, screenings, workshops and public cultural activity. These are meaningful free-life routes, though much commercial entertainment remains subscription or ticket based.

For Philippines, philippine law grants the general public free admission to public museums, national historical shrines and landmarks subject to capacity, and National Museum visitor guidance continues free admission. National Arts Month also includes free tours, screenings, workshops and public cultural activity. These are meaningful free-life routes, though much commercial entertainment remains subscription or ticket based.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-52.5× 15%= -7.9 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -52.5 × 15% = -7.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, philippine law grants the general public free admission to public museums, national historical shrines and landmarks subject to capacity, and National Museum visitor guidance continues free admission. National Arts Month also includes free tours, screenings, workshops and public cultural activity. These are meaningful free-life routes, though much commercial entertainment remains subscription or ticket based.

For Philippines, philippine law grants the general public free admission to public museums, national historical shrines and landmarks subject to capacity, and National Museum visitor guidance continues free admission. National Arts Month also includes free tours, screenings, workshops and public cultural activity. These are meaningful free-life routes, though much commercial entertainment remains subscription or ticket based.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.01 + -17.86 + -20.18 + -7.87 = -57.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +41.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +41.8. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -57.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+41.8 Original evidence category score+41.8 Contribution to national evidence score+2.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 22.75 + -8.75 + 9.00 = 41.75

Base: 41.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +41.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 41.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.58 points

For Philippines, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — peace-beauty-delight domestic evidence retained

For Philippines, philippine law grants the general public free admission to public museums, national historical shrines and landmarks subject to capacity, and National Museum visitor guidance continues free admission. National Arts Month also includes free tours, screenings, workshops and public cultural activity. These are meaningful free-life routes, though much commercial entertainment remains subscription or ticket based.

2026-10-11 National Museum of the Philippines — Free Admission for the General Public · National Commission for Culture and the Arts — National Arts Month 2025
National museums and public cultural programs provide genuine free cultural access

For Philippines, philippine law grants the general public free admission to public museums, national historical shrines and landmarks subject to capacity, and National Museum visitor guidance continues free admission. National Arts Month also includes free tours, screenings, workshops and public cultural activity. These are meaningful free-life routes, though much commercial entertainment remains subscription or ticket based.

2026-10-05 National Museum of the Philippines — Free Admission for the General Public · National Commission for Culture and the Arts — National Arts Month 2025
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-59.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +35.8

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-59.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-48.1× 25%= -12.0 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -48.1 × 25% = -12.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, pSA environmental accounts report 4.73 million hectares of ecosystems inside protected areas in 2025. The national biodiversity strategy targets expansion and effective management toward 24% terrestrial and 16% coastal/marine protection by 2040, while the archipelago remains highly exposed to storms, sea-level rise and habitat pressure.

For Philippines, pSA environmental accounts report 4.73 million hectares of ecosystems inside protected areas in 2025. The national biodiversity strategy targets expansion and effective management toward 24% terrestrial and 16% coastal/marine protection by 2040, while the archipelago remains highly exposed to storms, sea-level rise and habitat pressure.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-54.0× 35%= -18.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -54.0 × 35% = -18.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Philippines, pSA environmental accounts report 4.73 million hectares of ecosystems inside protected areas in 2025. The national biodiversity strategy targets expansion and effective management toward 24% terrestrial and 16% coastal/marine protection by 2040, while the archipelago remains highly exposed to storms, sea-level rise and habitat pressure.

For Philippines, pSA environmental accounts report 4.73 million hectares of ecosystems inside protected areas in 2025. The national biodiversity strategy targets expansion and effective management toward 24% terrestrial and 16% coastal/marine protection by 2040, while the archipelago remains highly exposed to storms, sea-level rise and habitat pressure.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-83.7× 25%= -20.9 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.7 × 25% = -20.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, pSA environmental accounts report 4.73 million hectares of ecosystems inside protected areas in 2025. The national biodiversity strategy targets expansion and effective management toward 24% terrestrial and 16% coastal/marine protection by 2040, while the archipelago remains highly exposed to storms, sea-level rise and habitat pressure.

For Philippines, pSA environmental accounts report 4.73 million hectares of ecosystems inside protected areas in 2025. The national biodiversity strategy targets expansion and effective management toward 24% terrestrial and 16% coastal/marine protection by 2040, while the archipelago remains highly exposed to storms, sea-level rise and habitat pressure.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-52.5× 15%= -7.9 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -52.5 × 15% = -7.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, pSA environmental accounts report 4.73 million hectares of ecosystems inside protected areas in 2025. The national biodiversity strategy targets expansion and effective management toward 24% terrestrial and 16% coastal/marine protection by 2040, while the archipelago remains highly exposed to storms, sea-level rise and habitat pressure.

For Philippines, pSA environmental accounts report 4.73 million hectares of ecosystems inside protected areas in 2025. The national biodiversity strategy targets expansion and effective management toward 24% terrestrial and 16% coastal/marine protection by 2040, while the archipelago remains highly exposed to storms, sea-level rise and habitat pressure.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.01 + -18.90 + -20.92 + -7.87 = -59.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +35.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +35.8. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -59.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+35.8 Original evidence category score+35.8 Contribution to national evidence score+2.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 19.25 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 35.75

Base: 35.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 35.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.21 points

For Philippines, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — living-ground-resilience domestic evidence retained

For Philippines, pSA environmental accounts report 4.73 million hectares of ecosystems inside protected areas in 2025. The national biodiversity strategy targets expansion and effective management toward 24% terrestrial and 16% coastal/marine protection by 2040, while the archipelago remains highly exposed to storms, sea-level rise and habitat pressure.

2026-10-11 Philippine Statistics Authority — Environmental Conditions and Quality · Biodiversity Management Bureau — Philippine Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2024–2040
Large protected ecosystems coexist with severe climate and land-use pressure

For Philippines, pSA environmental accounts report 4.73 million hectares of ecosystems inside protected areas in 2025. The national biodiversity strategy targets expansion and effective management toward 24% terrestrial and 16% coastal/marine protection by 2040, while the archipelago remains highly exposed to storms, sea-level rise and habitat pressure.

2026-10-05 Philippine Statistics Authority — Environmental Conditions and Quality · Biodiversity Management Bureau — Philippine Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2024–2040
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-65.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +16.0

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-65.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-54.0× 25%= -13.5 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -54.0 × 25% = -13.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks the Philippines 97th of 143 countries overall, 106th in civil justice and 119th in criminal justice. The report says civil justice weakened and notes declining judicial independence from improper government influence, indicating substantial institutional friction even where formal legal systems exist.

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks the Philippines 97th of 143 countries overall, 106th in civil justice and 119th in criminal justice. The report says civil justice weakened and notes declining judicial independence from improper government influence, indicating substantial institutional friction even where formal legal systems exist.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-58.4× 35%= -20.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

40.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -58.4 × 35% = -20.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks the Philippines 97th of 143 countries overall, 106th in civil justice and 119th in criminal justice. The report says civil justice weakened and notes declining judicial independence from improper government influence, indicating substantial institutional friction even where formal legal systems exist.

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks the Philippines 97th of 143 countries overall, 106th in civil justice and 119th in criminal justice. The report says civil justice weakened and notes declining judicial independence from improper government influence, indicating substantial institutional friction even where formal legal systems exist.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-89.6× 25%= -22.4 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -89.6 × 25% = -22.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks the Philippines 97th of 143 countries overall, 106th in civil justice and 119th in criminal justice. The report says civil justice weakened and notes declining judicial independence from improper government influence, indicating substantial institutional friction even where formal legal systems exist.

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks the Philippines 97th of 143 countries overall, 106th in civil justice and 119th in criminal justice. The report says civil justice weakened and notes declining judicial independence from improper government influence, indicating substantial institutional friction even where formal legal systems exist.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-61.4× 15%= -9.2 points
Exact point calculation

30.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points

Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -61.4 × 15% = -9.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks the Philippines 97th of 143 countries overall, 106th in civil justice and 119th in criminal justice. The report says civil justice weakened and notes declining judicial independence from improper government influence, indicating substantial institutional friction even where formal legal systems exist.

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks the Philippines 97th of 143 countries overall, 106th in civil justice and 119th in criminal justice. The report says civil justice weakened and notes declining judicial independence from improper government influence, indicating substantial institutional friction even where formal legal systems exist.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.50 + -20.45 + -22.40 + -9.22 = -65.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +16.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +16.0. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -65.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+16.0 Original evidence category score+16.0 Contribution to national evidence score+0.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 14.00 + -16.25 + 4.50 = 16.00

Base: 16.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +16.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 16.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 0.82 points

For Philippines, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — justice-safety-friction domestic evidence retained

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks the Philippines 97th of 143 countries overall, 106th in civil justice and 119th in criminal justice. The report says civil justice weakened and notes declining judicial independence from improper government influence, indicating substantial institutional friction even where formal legal systems exist.

2026-10-11 World Justice Project — Philippines 2025 Rule of Law Index
Rule-of-law performance remains weak despite modest improvement

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks the Philippines 97th of 143 countries overall, 106th in civil justice and 119th in criminal justice. The report says civil justice weakened and notes declining judicial independence from improper government influence, indicating substantial institutional friction even where formal legal systems exist.

2026-10-05 World Justice Project — Philippines 2025 Rule of Law Index
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-64.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +18.5

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-64.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-54.0× 25%= -13.5 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -54.0 × 25% = -13.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, dENR reported roughly 61,000 metric tons of waste generated daily and highlighted persistent implementation gaps in ecological solid-waste management. The EPR framework requires large companies to recover increasing shares of plastic packaging, with a 50% target for 2025 and 60% for 2026, creating a material-return route that is still far from eliminating disposal dependence.

For Philippines, dENR reported roughly 61,000 metric tons of waste generated daily and highlighted persistent implementation gaps in ecological solid-waste management. The EPR framework requires large companies to recover increasing shares of plastic packaging, with a 50% target for 2025 and 60% for 2026, creating a material-return route that is still far from eliminating disposal dependence.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-59.9× 35%= -21.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -59.9 × 35% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, dENR reported roughly 61,000 metric tons of waste generated daily and highlighted persistent implementation gaps in ecological solid-waste management. The EPR framework requires large companies to recover increasing shares of plastic packaging, with a 50% target for 2025 and 60% for 2026, creating a material-return route that is still far from eliminating disposal dependence.

For Philippines, dENR reported roughly 61,000 metric tons of waste generated daily and highlighted persistent implementation gaps in ecological solid-waste management. The EPR framework requires large companies to recover increasing shares of plastic packaging, with a 50% target for 2025 and 60% for 2026, creating a material-return route that is still far from eliminating disposal dependence.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-88.1× 25%= -22.0 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -88.1 × 25% = -22.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Philippines, dENR reported roughly 61,000 metric tons of waste generated daily and highlighted persistent implementation gaps in ecological solid-waste management. The EPR framework requires large companies to recover increasing shares of plastic packaging, with a 50% target for 2025 and 60% for 2026, creating a material-return route that is still far from eliminating disposal dependence.

For Philippines, dENR reported roughly 61,000 metric tons of waste generated daily and highlighted persistent implementation gaps in ecological solid-waste management. The EPR framework requires large companies to recover increasing shares of plastic packaging, with a 50% target for 2025 and 60% for 2026, creating a material-return route that is still far from eliminating disposal dependence.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-55.5× 15%= -8.3 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -55.5 × 15% = -8.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Philippines, dENR reported roughly 61,000 metric tons of waste generated daily and highlighted persistent implementation gaps in ecological solid-waste management. The EPR framework requires large companies to recover increasing shares of plastic packaging, with a 50% target for 2025 and 60% for 2026, creating a material-return route that is still far from eliminating disposal dependence.

For Philippines, dENR reported roughly 61,000 metric tons of waste generated daily and highlighted persistent implementation gaps in ecological solid-waste management. The EPR framework requires large companies to recover increasing shares of plastic packaging, with a 50% target for 2025 and 60% for 2026, creating a material-return route that is still far from eliminating disposal dependence.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.50 + -20.97 + -22.03 + -8.32 = -64.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +18.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +18.5. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+18.5 Original evidence category score+18.5 Contribution to national evidence score+0.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 12.25 + -15.00 + 7.50 = 18.50

Base: 18.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +18.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 18.50 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 0.76 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

For Philippines, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — durability-material-return domestic evidence retained

For Philippines, dENR reported roughly 61,000 metric tons of waste generated daily and highlighted persistent implementation gaps in ecological solid-waste management. The EPR framework requires large companies to recover increasing shares of plastic packaging, with a 50% target for 2025 and 60% for 2026, creating a material-return route that is still far from eliminating disposal dependence.

2026-10-11 DENR — Sustainable Waste Management 2025 LGIS Forum · Environmental Management Bureau — EPR program FAQ
Circular-economy laws are strengthening, but waste generation and diversion gaps remain large

For Philippines, dENR reported roughly 61,000 metric tons of waste generated daily and highlighted persistent implementation gaps in ecological solid-waste management. The EPR framework requires large companies to recover increasing shares of plastic packaging, with a 50% target for 2025 and 60% for 2026, creating a material-return route that is still far from eliminating disposal dependence.

2026-10-05 DENR — Sustainable Waste Management 2025 LGIS Forum · Environmental Management Bureau — EPR program FAQ
6% weight International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
-55.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence +50.0

International score breakdown

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

-55.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Entry Accessibility 25%
See all nine International Welcome Entry Accessibility scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-51.0× 25%= -12.8 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -51.0 × 25% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Philippines publishes nationality-specific visa-free short-stay rules, generally subject to duration and onward-ticket restrictions.

🤔
Migrant Practical Life 30%
See all nine International Welcome Migrant Practical Life scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-62.6× 30%= -18.8 points
Exact point calculation

26.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 7.80 weighted points

Original evidence +26.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +26.0; Money-gated reading -62.6 × 30% = -18.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Philippines, the Department of Justice maintains an organised protection process for refugees and stateless persons, distinct from tourist visas.

🤔
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome 25%
See all nine International Welcome Refugee / Neighbour Welcome scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.5× 25%= -12.4 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -49.5 × 25% = -12.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

The Philippines has a national refugee and stateless-person protection process; official services give specific entry and status pathways.

UNHCR describes the Philippines as maintaining a favorable protection environment for refugees, asylum seekers and stateless persons; in 2025 the government renewed free legal assistance for these groups and celebrated National Refugee Day. Ordinary temporary visitors, however, still move through nationality-based visa-waiver and paid extension rules.

🤔
Flexibility / Continuity 20%
See all nine International Welcome Flexibility / Continuity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.8× 20%= -11.6 points
Exact point calculation

42.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 8.40 weighted points

Original evidence +42.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +42.0; Money-gated reading -57.8 × 20% = -11.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Philippines, dOJ documents work with refugees and their continuing needs; programme availability does not demonstrate full family coverage.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.75 + -18.78 + -12.38 + -11.58 = -55.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +50.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +50.0. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -55.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+50.0 Original evidence category score+50.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 16.25 + 7.80 + 17.50 + 8.40 = 49.95

Base: 49.95 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +50.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 49.95 × (6.00 × 76.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.35 points

For Philippines, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 76% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.56%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — Flexibility / Continuity (international-access-human-welcome)

For Philippines, dOJ documents work with refugees and their continuing needs; programme availability does not demonstrate full family coverage.

2026-10-11 Philippine Department of Justice
2026 full review — Philippines — Refugee / Neighbour Welcome (international-access-human-welcome)

The Philippines has a national refugee and stateless-person protection process; official services give specific entry and status pathways.

2026-10-11 Philippine Department of Justice RSPPU
2026 full review — Philippines — Migrant Practical Life (international-access-human-welcome)

For Philippines, the Department of Justice maintains an organised protection process for refugees and stateless persons, distinct from tourist visas.

2026-10-11 Philippine Department of Justice
2026 full review — Philippines — Entry Accessibility (international-access-human-welcome)

Philippines publishes nationality-specific visa-free short-stay rules, generally subject to duration and onward-ticket restrictions.

2026-10-11 Philippine eVisa official policy
Refugee protection is unusually developed regionally, while ordinary entry still uses visa and extension rules

UNHCR describes the Philippines as maintaining a favorable protection environment for refugees, asylum seekers and stateless persons; in 2025 the government renewed free legal assistance for these groups and celebrated National Refugee Day. Ordinary temporary visitors, however, still move through nationality-based visa-waiver and paid extension rules.

2026-10-05 UNHCR Philippines — National Refugee Day 2025 · Bureau of Immigration — Temporary Visitor Visa Waiver
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-60.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence +34.8

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-60.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Positive Contribution 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-52.5× 25%= -13.1 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -52.5 × 25% = -13.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

The Philippines sent an inter-agency humanitarian response including medical teams after Myanmar's 2025 earthquake.

🤔
Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-53.1× 25%= -13.3 points
Exact point calculation

58.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 14.50 weighted points

Original evidence +58.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +58.0; Money-gated reading -53.1 × 25% = -13.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Philippines, the deployed Philippine team delivered direct healthcare in Myanmar; this is visible cross-border life support rather than an aid-spending claim alone.

🤔
Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-70.3× 35%= -24.6 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -70.3 × 35% = -24.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Philippines, one documented humanitarian mission cannot establish the harm, military impacts or net effects of the whole external footprint.

🤔
Accountability / Repair 15%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-59.9× 15%= -9.0 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -59.9 × 15% = -9.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

The Philippines publishes reporting on humanitarian missions, but an independent worldwide harm-repair ledger is not established.

At the 2025 ECOSOC Humanitarian Affairs Segment, the Philippines called for a people-centered humanitarian reset grounded in law, equity, anticipatory systems and local leadership. This is positive external-conduct evidence, but it does not by itself measure the country’s full trade, finance, labor-export, ecological or corporate footprint abroad, so this category remains factual and unscored.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.13 + -13.27 + -24.61 + -8.99 = -60.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +34.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +34.8. Money Gate ceiling: -40.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -60.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+34.8 Original evidence category score+34.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 15.00 + 14.50 + 0.00 + 5.25 = 34.75

Base: 34.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +34.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 34.75 × (6.00 × 76.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.63 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Exported waste / garbageAudit pending
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

For Philippines, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 76% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.56%. After normalization across Philippines’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Philippines — Accountability / Repair (external-footprint-non-extractive)

The Philippines publishes reporting on humanitarian missions, but an independent worldwide harm-repair ledger is not established.

2026-10-11 Philippine Information Agency
2026 full review — Philippines — Documented Harm / Extraction (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For Philippines, one documented humanitarian mission cannot establish the harm, military impacts or net effects of the whole external footprint.

2026-10-11 Philippine Government external cooperation statement
2026 full review — Philippines — Mutuality / Local Benefit (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For Philippines, the deployed Philippine team delivered direct healthcare in Myanmar; this is visible cross-border life support rather than an aid-spending claim alone.

2026-10-11 Philippine Information Agency Myanmar mission
2026 full review — Philippines — Positive Contribution (external-footprint-non-extractive)

The Philippines sent an inter-agency humanitarian response including medical teams after Myanmar's 2025 earthquake.

2026-10-11 Philippine Information Agency
International humanitarian posture emphasizes equity and local leadership, but full external-footprint accounting remains incomplete

At the 2025 ECOSOC Humanitarian Affairs Segment, the Philippines called for a people-centered humanitarian reset grounded in law, equity, anticipatory systems and local leadership. This is positive external-conduct evidence, but it does not by itself measure the country’s full trade, finance, labor-export, ecological or corporate footprint abroad, so this category remains factual and unscored.

2026-10-05 Department of Foreign Affairs — Philippines calls for global humanitarian reset · UNHCR Philippines — protection environment

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.