Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Mexico 🇲🇽

Mexico currently ranks #110 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -62.21. This country is money-gated (3.50/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Energy and weakest in Family across 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Data updatedEvidence through 10 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-62.2
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: +28.7 · Money Gate: 3.50/20 · Headline: -62.2.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#110of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

MexicoLast recorded move: down from #100 to #110.Recent recorded movements
  1. #100 → #11020 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  2. #100 → #10320 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  3. #91 → #10020 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #83 → #9120 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 57: rank 132. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 57: rank 132. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 9 Oct 2026 · 07:51 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 57: rank 140. 9 Oct 2026 · 12:04 GMT-0500 – 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 57: rank 141. 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 57: rank 126. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 57: rank 125. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 57: rank 124. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 57: rank 125. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 57: rank 126. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 57: rank 125. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 57: rank 124. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 57: rank 123. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 57: rank 122. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 57: rank 116. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 57: rank 115. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 57: rank 114. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 57: rank 115. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 57: rank 116. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 57: rank 115. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 57: rank 116. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 57: rank 115. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 57: rank 114. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 57: rank 113. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 57: rank 114. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 57: rank 113. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 57: rank 112. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 57: rank 111. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 57: rank 110. 16 Oct 2026 · 15:38 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 57: rank 109. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 57: rank 108. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 57: rank 107. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 57: rank 106. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 57: rank 105. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 57: rank 104. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 57: rank 103. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 57: rank 102. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 57: rank 101. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 57: rank 100. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 57: rank 99. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 57: rank 98. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 57: rank 97. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 57: rank 96. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 57: rank 95. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 57: rank 94. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 45 of 57: rank 93. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 46 of 57: rank 92. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 47 of 57: rank 91. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 48 of 57: rank 90. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 49 of 57: rank 89. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 50 of 57: rank 88. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 51 of 57: rank 87. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 52 of 57: rank 86. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 53 of 57: rank 85. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 54 of 57: rank 84. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 55 of 57: rank 91. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 56 of 57: rank 100. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 57 of 57: rank 103. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500SAVED #103CALC #110Oct 2026Oct 2026

Last archived rank #103 · Current calculated rank #110 The dated graph ends at the saved position. The current calculation has not yet been captured as a dated history point; it is not proof of a new score change.

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

97%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 76.0% + 6.0 × 76.0% = 97.12% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#13

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

0.3 / 4

Food

Why 0.3 / 4?

National food insecurity evidence confirms unmet need; small targeted feeding actions do not amount to free universal household food.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
0.3 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 0.3 / 4?

Housing deprivation remains in national poverty figures; no national permanent no-payment housing or land entitlement is demonstrated by the cited housing measure.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
2.8 / 4

Healthcare

Why 2.8 / 4?

IMSS-Bienestar offers no-charge clinical care and medicines to people without social security, with coverage through participating public facilities.

Point calculation

2.75 ÷ 4 × 100 = 68.75% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
0.0 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.0 / 4?

National time-use data count commuting and travel burden but do not establish a broad no-fare travel right.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
0.3 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 0.3 / 4?

National electricity extension is an infrastructure commitment, not no-cost energy; no countrywide free water and power entitlement is substantiated.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
Money Gate score
  • Food0.3 / 4
  • Housing / Land0.3 / 4
  • Healthcare2.8 / 4
  • Transportation0.0 / 4
  • Water / Energy0.3 / 4
  • Money still needed16.5 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 3.5 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 0.25 + Housing / Land 0.25 + Healthcare 2.75 + Transportation 0.00 + Water / Energy 0.25 = 3.50 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
78.9 / 100
Why 78.9 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -57.73) ÷ 2 = 78.87 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-41.3
Why -41.3?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 3.50 = -41.3

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-64.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence +22.5

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-64.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-48.6× 25%= -12.2 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -48.6 × 25% = -12.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

ENUT 2024 shows a heavy and unequal total work burden. Women averaged 39.7 weekly hours of unpaid domestic, care and volunteer work versus 18.2 for men, a 21.5-hour gap. The survey also measures paid work and commuting, so Mexico has strong time-use evidence but substantial care burden remains concentrated inside households.

ENUT 2024 shows a heavy and unequal total work burden. Women averaged 39.7 weekly hours of unpaid domestic, care and volunteer work versus 18.2 for men, a 21.5-hour gap. The survey also measures paid work and commuting, so Mexico has strong time-use evidence but substantial care burden remains concentrated inside households.

ENUT 2024 shows a heavy and unequal total work burden. Women averaged 39.7 weekly hours of unpaid domestic, care and volunteer work versus 18.2 for men, a 21.5-hour gap. The survey also measures paid work and commuting, so Mexico has strong time-use evidence but substantial care burden remains concentrated inside households.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.4× 35%= -20.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -57.4 × 35% = -20.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

ENUT 2024 shows a heavy and unequal total work burden. Women averaged 39.7 weekly hours of unpaid domestic, care and volunteer work versus 18.2 for men, a 21.5-hour gap. The survey also measures paid work and commuting, so Mexico has strong time-use evidence but substantial care burden remains concentrated inside households.

ENUT 2024 shows a heavy and unequal total work burden. Women averaged 39.7 weekly hours of unpaid domestic, care and volunteer work versus 18.2 for men, a 21.5-hour gap. The survey also measures paid work and commuting, so Mexico has strong time-use evidence but substantial care burden remains concentrated inside households.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-88.3× 25%= -22.1 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -88.3 × 25% = -22.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Mexico ENUT 2024 records weekly unpaid domestic, care, community and voluntary work averaging 39.7 hours for women and 18.2 for men, a difference of 21.5 hours. Figures are for that specific broad unpaid-work grouping.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-64.8× 15%= -9.7 points
Exact point calculation

20.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.00 weighted points

Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -64.8 × 15% = -9.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

ENUT 2024 shows a heavy and unequal total work burden. Women averaged 39.7 weekly hours of unpaid domestic, care and volunteer work versus 18.2 for men, a 21.5-hour gap. The survey also measures paid work and commuting, so Mexico has strong time-use evidence but substantial care burden remains concentrated inside households.

ENUT 2024 shows a heavy and unequal total work burden. Women averaged 39.7 weekly hours of unpaid domestic, care and volunteer work versus 18.2 for men, a 21.5-hour gap. The survey also measures paid work and commuting, so Mexico has strong time-use evidence but substantial care burden remains concentrated inside households.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.15 + -20.09 + -22.06 + -9.72 = -64.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +22.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +22.5. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+22.5 Original evidence category score+22.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 15.75 + -15.00 + 3.00 = 22.50

Base: 22.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +22.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 22.50 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.09 points

For Mexico, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +30.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — human-time-burden domestic evidence retained

ENUT 2024 shows a heavy and unequal total work burden. Women averaged 39.7 weekly hours of unpaid domestic, care and volunteer work versus 18.2 for men, a 21.5-hour gap. The survey also measures paid work and commuting, so Mexico has strong time-use evidence but substantial care burden remains concentrated inside households.

2026-10-11 INEGI — Encuesta Nacional sobre Uso del Tiempo 2024 · SNIEG/INEGI — Resultados ENUT 2024
2026 full review — Mexico — human-time-burden domestic evidence retained

ENUT 2024 shows a heavy and unequal total work burden. Women averaged 39.7 weekly hours of unpaid domestic, care and volunteer work versus 18.2 for men, a 21.5-hour gap. The survey also measures paid work and commuting, so Mexico has strong time-use evidence but substantial care burden remains concentrated inside households.

2026-10-11 INEGI — Encuesta Nacional sobre Uso del Tiempo 2024 · SNIEG/INEGI — Resultados ENUT 2024
Mexico: Human Time Burden research finding

ENUT 2024 shows a heavy and unequal total work burden. Women averaged 39.7 weekly hours of unpaid domestic, care and volunteer work versus 18.2 for men, a 21.5-hour gap. The survey also measures paid work and commuting, so Mexico has strong time-use evidence but substantial care burden remains concentrated inside households.

2025-08-28 INEGI — Encuesta Nacional sobre Uso del Tiempo 2024 · SNIEG/INEGI — Resultados ENUT 2024
2026-10-21 independent source check — MEX — household time and care

Mexico ENUT 2024 records weekly unpaid domestic, care, community and voluntary work averaging 39.7 hours for women and 18.2 for men, a difference of 21.5 hours. Figures are for that specific broad unpaid-work grouping.

INEGI
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-60.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +33.5

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-60.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-45.7× 25%= -11.4 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -45.7 × 25% = -11.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, housing stock and construction capacity are large, but ordinary reach is uneven. INEGI reports 7.9% of the population lacked adequate housing quality/space in 2024 and 14.1% lacked basic housing services. The federal housing programme reported hundreds of thousands of lower-income homes under construction, which is capacity in progress rather than completed universal access.

For Mexico, housing stock and construction capacity are large, but ordinary reach is uneven. INEGI reports 7.9% of the population lacked adequate housing quality/space in 2024 and 14.1% lacked basic housing services. The federal housing programme reported hundreds of thousands of lower-income homes under construction, which is capacity in progress rather than completed universal access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-54.5× 35%= -19.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -54.5 × 35% = -19.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Mexico, housing stock and construction capacity are large, but ordinary reach is uneven. INEGI reports 7.9% of the population lacked adequate housing quality/space in 2024 and 14.1% lacked basic housing services. The federal housing programme reported hundreds of thousands of lower-income homes under construction, which is capacity in progress rather than completed universal access.

For Mexico, housing stock and construction capacity are large, but ordinary reach is uneven. INEGI reports 7.9% of the population lacked adequate housing quality/space in 2024 and 14.1% lacked basic housing services. The federal housing programme reported hundreds of thousands of lower-income homes under construction, which is capacity in progress rather than completed universal access.

For Mexico, housing stock and construction capacity are large, but ordinary reach is uneven. INEGI reports 7.9% of the population lacked adequate housing quality/space in 2024 and 14.1% lacked basic housing services. The federal housing programme reported hundreds of thousands of lower-income homes under construction, which is capacity in progress rather than completed universal access.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-86.8× 25%= -21.7 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -86.8 × 25% = -21.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, housing stock and construction capacity are large, but ordinary reach is uneven. INEGI reports 7.9% of the population lacked adequate housing quality/space in 2024 and 14.1% lacked basic housing services. The federal housing programme reported hundreds of thousands of lower-income homes under construction, which is capacity in progress rather than completed universal access.

For Mexico, housing stock and construction capacity are large, but ordinary reach is uneven. INEGI reports 7.9% of the population lacked adequate housing quality/space in 2024 and 14.1% lacked basic housing services. The federal housing programme reported hundreds of thousands of lower-income homes under construction, which is capacity in progress rather than completed universal access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.4× 15%= -8.6 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -57.4 × 15% = -8.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, housing stock and construction capacity are large, but ordinary reach is uneven. INEGI reports 7.9% of the population lacked adequate housing quality/space in 2024 and 14.1% lacked basic housing services. The federal housing programme reported hundreds of thousands of lower-income homes under construction, which is capacity in progress rather than completed universal access.

For Mexico, housing stock and construction capacity are large, but ordinary reach is uneven. INEGI reports 7.9% of the population lacked adequate housing quality/space in 2024 and 14.1% lacked basic housing services. The federal housing programme reported hundreds of thousands of lower-income homes under construction, which is capacity in progress rather than completed universal access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.41 + -19.06 + -21.70 + -8.61 = -60.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +33.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +33.5. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -60.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+33.5 Original evidence category score+33.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 19.25 + -13.75 + 6.75 = 33.50

Base: 33.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +33.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 33.50 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.76 points

For Mexico, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +30.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — housing-shelter-reach domestic evidence retained

For Mexico, housing stock and construction capacity are large, but ordinary reach is uneven. INEGI reports 7.9% of the population lacked adequate housing quality/space in 2024 and 14.1% lacked basic housing services. The federal housing programme reported hundreds of thousands of lower-income homes under construction, which is capacity in progress rather than completed universal access.

2026-10-11 INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024 · SEDATU — Vivienda para el Bienestar
2026 full review — Mexico — housing-shelter-reach domestic evidence retained

For Mexico, housing stock and construction capacity are large, but ordinary reach is uneven. INEGI reports 7.9% of the population lacked adequate housing quality/space in 2024 and 14.1% lacked basic housing services. The federal housing programme reported hundreds of thousands of lower-income homes under construction, which is capacity in progress rather than completed universal access.

2026-10-11 INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024 · SEDATU — Vivienda para el Bienestar
Mexico: Housing Shelter Reach research finding

For Mexico, housing stock and construction capacity are large, but ordinary reach is uneven. INEGI reports 7.9% of the population lacked adequate housing quality/space in 2024 and 14.1% lacked basic housing services. The federal housing programme reported hundreds of thousands of lower-income homes under construction, which is capacity in progress rather than completed universal access.

2025-08-13 INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024 · SEDATU — Vivienda para el Bienestar
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-59.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +39.3

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-59.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-42.7× 25%= -10.7 points
Exact point calculation

95.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 23.75 weighted points

Original evidence +95.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +95.0; Money-gated reading -42.7 × 25% = -10.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico has major agricultural, livestock, fisheries and food-system capacity, with 2025 production datasets covering crops and livestock nationwide. Yet INEGI found 14.4% of the population lacked access to nutritious, quality food in 2024, and 9.3% had income below the extreme-poverty food-basket line. Physical food capacity therefore coexists with a strong purchasing-power gate.

Mexico has major agricultural, livestock, fisheries and food-system capacity, with 2025 production datasets covering crops and livestock nationwide. Yet INEGI found 14.4% of the population lacked access to nutritious, quality food in 2024, and 9.3% had income below the extreme-poverty food-basket line. Physical food capacity therefore coexists with a strong purchasing-power gate.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-53.0× 35%= -18.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -53.0 × 35% = -18.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico has major agricultural, livestock, fisheries and food-system capacity, with 2025 production datasets covering crops and livestock nationwide. Yet INEGI found 14.4% of the population lacked access to nutritious, quality food in 2024, and 9.3% had income below the extreme-poverty food-basket line. Physical food capacity therefore coexists with a strong purchasing-power gate.

Mexico has major agricultural, livestock, fisheries and food-system capacity, with 2025 production datasets covering crops and livestock nationwide. Yet INEGI found 14.4% of the population lacked access to nutritious, quality food in 2024, and 9.3% had income below the extreme-poverty food-basket line. Physical food capacity therefore coexists with a strong purchasing-power gate.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-86.8× 25%= -21.7 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -86.8 × 25% = -21.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Mexico has major agricultural, livestock, fisheries and food-system capacity, with 2025 production datasets covering crops and livestock nationwide. Yet INEGI found 14.4% of the population lacked access to nutritious, quality food in 2024, and 9.3% had income below the extreme-poverty food-basket line. Physical food capacity therefore coexists with a strong purchasing-power gate.

Mexico has major agricultural, livestock, fisheries and food-system capacity, with 2025 production datasets covering crops and livestock nationwide. Yet INEGI found 14.4% of the population lacked access to nutritious, quality food in 2024, and 9.3% had income below the extreme-poverty food-basket line. Physical food capacity therefore coexists with a strong purchasing-power gate.

Mexico has major agricultural, livestock, fisheries and food-system capacity, with 2025 production datasets covering crops and livestock nationwide. Yet INEGI found 14.4% of the population lacked access to nutritious, quality food in 2024, and 9.3% had income below the extreme-poverty food-basket line. Physical food capacity therefore coexists with a strong purchasing-power gate.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-54.5× 15%= -8.2 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -54.5 × 15% = -8.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico has major agricultural, livestock, fisheries and food-system capacity, with 2025 production datasets covering crops and livestock nationwide. Yet INEGI found 14.4% of the population lacked access to nutritious, quality food in 2024, and 9.3% had income below the extreme-poverty food-basket line. Physical food capacity therefore coexists with a strong purchasing-power gate.

Mexico has major agricultural, livestock, fisheries and food-system capacity, with 2025 production datasets covering crops and livestock nationwide. Yet INEGI found 14.4% of the population lacked access to nutritious, quality food in 2024, and 9.3% had income below the extreme-poverty food-basket line. Physical food capacity therefore coexists with a strong purchasing-power gate.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.68 + -18.55 + -21.70 + -8.17 = -59.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +39.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +39.3. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -59.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+39.3 Original evidence category score+39.3 Contribution to national evidence score+3.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 23.75 + 21.00 + -13.75 + 8.25 = 39.25

Base: 39.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +39.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 39.25 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 3.64 points

For Mexico, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +35.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — food-nourishment-free-food domestic evidence retained

Mexico has major agricultural, livestock, fisheries and food-system capacity, with 2025 production datasets covering crops and livestock nationwide. Yet INEGI found 14.4% of the population lacked access to nutritious, quality food in 2024, and 9.3% had income below the extreme-poverty food-basket line. Physical food capacity therefore coexists with a strong purchasing-power gate.

2026-10-11 INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024 · Agricultura/DGSIAP — Producción Agrícola, cierre 2025
2026 full review — Mexico — food-nourishment-free-food domestic evidence retained

Mexico has major agricultural, livestock, fisheries and food-system capacity, with 2025 production datasets covering crops and livestock nationwide. Yet INEGI found 14.4% of the population lacked access to nutritious, quality food in 2024, and 9.3% had income below the extreme-poverty food-basket line. Physical food capacity therefore coexists with a strong purchasing-power gate.

2026-10-11 INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024 · Agricultura/DGSIAP — Producción Agrícola, cierre 2025
Mexico: Food Nourishment Free Food research finding

Mexico has major agricultural, livestock, fisheries and food-system capacity, with 2025 production datasets covering crops and livestock nationwide. Yet INEGI found 14.4% of the population lacked access to nutritious, quality food in 2024, and 9.3% had income below the extreme-poverty food-basket line. Physical food capacity therefore coexists with a strong purchasing-power gate.

2025-08-13 INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024 · Agricultura/DGSIAP — Producción Agrícola, cierre 2025
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-59.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence +39.5

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-59.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-45.7× 25%= -11.4 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -45.7 × 25% = -11.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, national water and sanitation infrastructure is extensive, but service quality and continuity are not uniform. INEGI reports 14.1% of the population lacked basic housing services in 2024; CONAGUA maintains national water, aquifer, drought, reservoir and quality systems, while official regional planning explicitly recognizes continuity and acceptable-quality gaps.

For Mexico, national water and sanitation infrastructure is extensive, but service quality and continuity are not uniform. INEGI reports 14.1% of the population lacked basic housing services in 2024; CONAGUA maintains national water, aquifer, drought, reservoir and quality systems, while official regional planning explicitly recognizes continuity and acceptable-quality gaps.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-51.5× 35%= -18.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -51.5 × 35% = -18.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, national water and sanitation infrastructure is extensive, but service quality and continuity are not uniform. INEGI reports 14.1% of the population lacked basic housing services in 2024; CONAGUA maintains national water, aquifer, drought, reservoir and quality systems, while official regional planning explicitly recognizes continuity and acceptable-quality gaps.

For Mexico, national water and sanitation infrastructure is extensive, but service quality and continuity are not uniform. INEGI reports 14.1% of the population lacked basic housing services in 2024; CONAGUA maintains national water, aquifer, drought, reservoir and quality systems, while official regional planning explicitly recognizes continuity and acceptable-quality gaps.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.8× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.8 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, national water and sanitation infrastructure is extensive, but service quality and continuity are not uniform. INEGI reports 14.1% of the population lacked basic housing services in 2024; CONAGUA maintains national water, aquifer, drought, reservoir and quality systems, while official regional planning explicitly recognizes continuity and acceptable-quality gaps.

For Mexico, national water and sanitation infrastructure is extensive, but service quality and continuity are not uniform. INEGI reports 14.1% of the population lacked basic housing services in 2024; CONAGUA maintains national water, aquifer, drought, reservoir and quality systems, while official regional planning explicitly recognizes continuity and acceptable-quality gaps.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.4× 15%= -8.6 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -57.4 × 15% = -8.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mexico, national water and sanitation infrastructure is extensive, but service quality and continuity are not uniform. INEGI reports 14.1% of the population lacked basic housing services in 2024; CONAGUA maintains national water, aquifer, drought, reservoir and quality systems, while official regional planning explicitly recognizes continuity and acceptable-quality gaps.

For Mexico, national water and sanitation infrastructure is extensive, but service quality and continuity are not uniform. INEGI reports 14.1% of the population lacked basic housing services in 2024; CONAGUA maintains national water, aquifer, drought, reservoir and quality systems, while official regional planning explicitly recognizes continuity and acceptable-quality gaps.

For Mexico, national water and sanitation infrastructure is extensive, but service quality and continuity are not uniform. INEGI reports 14.1% of the population lacked basic housing services in 2024; CONAGUA maintains national water, aquifer, drought, reservoir and quality systems, while official regional planning explicitly recognizes continuity and acceptable-quality gaps.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.41 + -18.04 + -20.96 + -8.61 = -59.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +39.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +39.5. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -59.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+39.5 Original evidence category score+39.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 22.75 + -11.25 + 6.75 = 39.50

Base: 39.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +39.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 39.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.44 points

For Mexico, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — water-sanitation domestic evidence retained

For Mexico, national water and sanitation infrastructure is extensive, but service quality and continuity are not uniform. INEGI reports 14.1% of the population lacked basic housing services in 2024; CONAGUA maintains national water, aquifer, drought, reservoir and quality systems, while official regional planning explicitly recognizes continuity and acceptable-quality gaps.

2026-10-11 INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024 · CONAGUA — Sistemas de Información del Agua
2026 full review — Mexico — water-sanitation domestic evidence retained

For Mexico, national water and sanitation infrastructure is extensive, but service quality and continuity are not uniform. INEGI reports 14.1% of the population lacked basic housing services in 2024; CONAGUA maintains national water, aquifer, drought, reservoir and quality systems, while official regional planning explicitly recognizes continuity and acceptable-quality gaps.

2026-10-11 INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024 · CONAGUA — Sistemas de Información del Agua
Mexico: Water Sanitation research finding

For Mexico, national water and sanitation infrastructure is extensive, but service quality and continuity are not uniform. INEGI reports 14.1% of the population lacked basic housing services in 2024; CONAGUA maintains national water, aquifer, drought, reservoir and quality systems, while official regional planning explicitly recognizes continuity and acceptable-quality gaps.

2025-08-13 INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024 · CONAGUA — Sistemas de Información del Agua
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-55.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +53.0

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-55.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-42.7× 25%= -10.7 points
Exact point calculation

95.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 23.75 weighted points

Original evidence +95.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +95.0; Money-gated reading -42.7 × 25% = -10.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, electricity reach is close to universal and the national strategy targets connection for more than 500,000 remaining households. Government infrastructure data report a 2025 generation mix of about 75% fossil and 25% clean. Strong grid capability therefore coexists with remaining household exclusion, tariff dependence and a carbon-heavy generation mix.

For Mexico, electricity reach is close to universal and the national strategy targets connection for more than 500,000 remaining households. Government infrastructure data report a 2025 generation mix of about 75% fossil and 25% clean. Strong grid capability therefore coexists with remaining household exclusion, tariff dependence and a carbon-heavy generation mix.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-45.7× 35%= -16.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

85.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 29.75 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -45.7 × 35% = -16.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, electricity reach is close to universal and the national strategy targets connection for more than 500,000 remaining households. Government infrastructure data report a 2025 generation mix of about 75% fossil and 25% clean. Strong grid capability therefore coexists with remaining household exclusion, tariff dependence and a carbon-heavy generation mix.

For Mexico, electricity reach is close to universal and the national strategy targets connection for more than 500,000 remaining households. Government infrastructure data report a 2025 generation mix of about 75% fossil and 25% clean. Strong grid capability therefore coexists with remaining household exclusion, tariff dependence and a carbon-heavy generation mix.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.9× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -80.9 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, electricity reach is close to universal and the national strategy targets connection for more than 500,000 remaining households. Government infrastructure data report a 2025 generation mix of about 75% fossil and 25% clean. Strong grid capability therefore coexists with remaining household exclusion, tariff dependence and a carbon-heavy generation mix.

For Mexico, electricity reach is close to universal and the national strategy targets connection for more than 500,000 remaining households. Government infrastructure data report a 2025 generation mix of about 75% fossil and 25% clean. Strong grid capability therefore coexists with remaining household exclusion, tariff dependence and a carbon-heavy generation mix.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-54.5× 15%= -8.2 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -54.5 × 15% = -8.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mexico, electricity reach is close to universal and the national strategy targets connection for more than 500,000 remaining households. Government infrastructure data report a 2025 generation mix of about 75% fossil and 25% clean. Strong grid capability therefore coexists with remaining household exclusion, tariff dependence and a carbon-heavy generation mix.

For Mexico, electricity reach is close to universal and the national strategy targets connection for more than 500,000 remaining households. Government infrastructure data report a 2025 generation mix of about 75% fossil and 25% clean. Strong grid capability therefore coexists with remaining household exclusion, tariff dependence and a carbon-heavy generation mix.

For Mexico, electricity reach is close to universal and the national strategy targets connection for more than 500,000 remaining households. Government infrastructure data report a 2025 generation mix of about 75% fossil and 25% clean. Strong grid capability therefore coexists with remaining household exclusion, tariff dependence and a carbon-heavy generation mix.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.68 + -15.98 + -20.23 + -8.17 = -55.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +53.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +53.0. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -55.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+53.0 Original evidence category score+53.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 23.75 + 29.75 + -8.75 + 8.25 = 53.00

Base: 53.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +53.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 53.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.73 points

For Mexico, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — energy-household-capability domestic evidence retained

For Mexico, electricity reach is close to universal and the national strategy targets connection for more than 500,000 remaining households. Government infrastructure data report a 2025 generation mix of about 75% fossil and 25% clean. Strong grid capability therefore coexists with remaining household exclusion, tariff dependence and a carbon-heavy generation mix.

2026-10-11 Presidencia de México — Estrategia Nacional del Sector Eléctrico · Proyectos México — Electricidad, generación 2025
2026 full review — Mexico — energy-household-capability domestic evidence retained

For Mexico, electricity reach is close to universal and the national strategy targets connection for more than 500,000 remaining households. Government infrastructure data report a 2025 generation mix of about 75% fossil and 25% clean. Strong grid capability therefore coexists with remaining household exclusion, tariff dependence and a carbon-heavy generation mix.

2026-10-11 Presidencia de México — Estrategia Nacional del Sector Eléctrico · Proyectos México — Electricidad, generación 2025
Mexico: Energy Household Capability research finding

For Mexico, electricity reach is close to universal and the national strategy targets connection for more than 500,000 remaining households. Government infrastructure data report a 2025 generation mix of about 75% fossil and 25% clean. Strong grid capability therefore coexists with remaining household exclusion, tariff dependence and a carbon-heavy generation mix.

2025-12-31 Presidencia de México — Estrategia Nacional del Sector Eléctrico · Proyectos México — Electricidad, generación 2025
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-63.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +25.3

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-63.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-48.6× 25%= -12.2 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -48.6 × 25% = -12.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, health access remains a major constraint. INEGI found 34.2% of the population lacked access to health services in 2024. OECD 2025 reports only 78% coverage for a core set of services, 2.7 practising doctors and 3.0 nurses per 1,000 people, one hospital bed per 1,000, and households directly financing more than one-third of health spending.

For Mexico, health access remains a major constraint. INEGI found 34.2% of the population lacked access to health services in 2024. OECD 2025 reports only 78% coverage for a core set of services, 2.7 practising doctors and 3.0 nurses per 1,000 people, one hospital bed per 1,000, and households directly financing more than one-third of health spending.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-55.9× 35%= -19.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 2.75/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -55.9 × 35% = -19.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, health access remains a major constraint. INEGI found 34.2% of the population lacked access to health services in 2024. OECD 2025 reports only 78% coverage for a core set of services, 2.7 practising doctors and 3.0 nurses per 1,000 people, one hospital bed per 1,000, and households directly financing more than one-third of health spending.

For Mexico, health access remains a major constraint. INEGI found 34.2% of the population lacked access to health services in 2024. OECD 2025 reports only 78% coverage for a core set of services, 2.7 practising doctors and 3.0 nurses per 1,000 people, one hospital bed per 1,000, and households directly financing more than one-third of health spending.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-89.7× 25%= -22.4 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -89.7 × 25% = -22.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, health access remains a major constraint. INEGI found 34.2% of the population lacked access to health services in 2024. OECD 2025 reports only 78% coverage for a core set of services, 2.7 practising doctors and 3.0 nurses per 1,000 people, one hospital bed per 1,000, and households directly financing more than one-third of health spending.

For Mexico, health access remains a major constraint. INEGI found 34.2% of the population lacked access to health services in 2024. OECD 2025 reports only 78% coverage for a core set of services, 2.7 practising doctors and 3.0 nurses per 1,000 people, one hospital bed per 1,000, and households directly financing more than one-third of health spending.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-60.3× 15%= -9.1 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -60.3 × 15% = -9.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mexico, health access remains a major constraint. INEGI found 34.2% of the population lacked access to health services in 2024. OECD 2025 reports only 78% coverage for a core set of services, 2.7 practising doctors and 3.0 nurses per 1,000 people, one hospital bed per 1,000, and households directly financing more than one-third of health spending.

For Mexico, health access remains a major constraint. INEGI found 34.2% of the population lacked access to health services in 2024. OECD 2025 reports only 78% coverage for a core set of services, 2.7 practising doctors and 3.0 nurses per 1,000 people, one hospital bed per 1,000, and households directly financing more than one-third of health spending.

For Mexico, health access remains a major constraint. INEGI found 34.2% of the population lacked access to health services in 2024. OECD 2025 reports only 78% coverage for a core set of services, 2.7 practising doctors and 3.0 nurses per 1,000 people, one hospital bed per 1,000, and households directly financing more than one-third of health spending.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.15 + -19.58 + -22.43 + -9.05 = -63.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +25.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +25.3. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+25.3 Original evidence category score+25.3 Contribution to national evidence score+1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 17.50 + -16.25 + 5.25 = 25.25

Base: 25.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +25.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 25.25 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.82 points

For Mexico, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — health-care-reach domestic evidence retained

For Mexico, health access remains a major constraint. INEGI found 34.2% of the population lacked access to health services in 2024. OECD 2025 reports only 78% coverage for a core set of services, 2.7 practising doctors and 3.0 nurses per 1,000 people, one hospital bed per 1,000, and households directly financing more than one-third of health spending.

2026-10-11 INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024 · OECD — Health at a Glance 2025: Mexico
2026 full review — Mexico — health-care-reach domestic evidence retained

For Mexico, health access remains a major constraint. INEGI found 34.2% of the population lacked access to health services in 2024. OECD 2025 reports only 78% coverage for a core set of services, 2.7 practising doctors and 3.0 nurses per 1,000 people, one hospital bed per 1,000, and households directly financing more than one-third of health spending.

2026-10-11 INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024 · OECD — Health at a Glance 2025: Mexico
Mexico: Health Care Reach research finding

For Mexico, health access remains a major constraint. INEGI found 34.2% of the population lacked access to health services in 2024. OECD 2025 reports only 78% coverage for a core set of services, 2.7 practising doctors and 3.0 nurses per 1,000 people, one hospital bed per 1,000, and households directly financing more than one-third of health spending.

2025-11-01 INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024 · OECD — Health at a Glance 2025: Mexico
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-56.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence +48.3

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-56.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-44.2× 25%= -11.1 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -44.2 × 25% = -11.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, basic-school reach is high but capability is not universal. SEP reported 2024-25 coverage of 99.5% in primary, 93.1% in secondary and 80.6% in upper-secondary education, while upper-secondary abandonment was 11.3% in 2023-24. INEGI separately found 18.6% of the population in educational lag in 2024.

For Mexico, basic-school reach is high but capability is not universal. SEP reported 2024-25 coverage of 99.5% in primary, 93.1% in secondary and 80.6% in upper-secondary education, while upper-secondary abandonment was 11.3% in 2023-24. INEGI separately found 18.6% of the population in educational lag in 2024.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-48.6× 35%= -17.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -48.6 × 35% = -17.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, basic-school reach is high but capability is not universal. SEP reported 2024-25 coverage of 99.5% in primary, 93.1% in secondary and 80.6% in upper-secondary education, while upper-secondary abandonment was 11.3% in 2023-24. INEGI separately found 18.6% of the population in educational lag in 2024.

For Mexico, basic-school reach is high but capability is not universal. SEP reported 2024-25 coverage of 99.5% in primary, 93.1% in secondary and 80.6% in upper-secondary education, while upper-secondary abandonment was 11.3% in 2023-24. INEGI separately found 18.6% of the population in educational lag in 2024.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-80.9× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -80.9 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, basic-school reach is high but capability is not universal. SEP reported 2024-25 coverage of 99.5% in primary, 93.1% in secondary and 80.6% in upper-secondary education, while upper-secondary abandonment was 11.3% in 2023-24. INEGI separately found 18.6% of the population in educational lag in 2024.

For Mexico, basic-school reach is high but capability is not universal. SEP reported 2024-25 coverage of 99.5% in primary, 93.1% in secondary and 80.6% in upper-secondary education, while upper-secondary abandonment was 11.3% in 2023-24. INEGI separately found 18.6% of the population in educational lag in 2024.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-54.5× 15%= -8.2 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -54.5 × 15% = -8.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mexico, basic-school reach is high but capability is not universal. SEP reported 2024-25 coverage of 99.5% in primary, 93.1% in secondary and 80.6% in upper-secondary education, while upper-secondary abandonment was 11.3% in 2023-24. INEGI separately found 18.6% of the population in educational lag in 2024.

For Mexico, basic-school reach is high but capability is not universal. SEP reported 2024-25 coverage of 99.5% in primary, 93.1% in secondary and 80.6% in upper-secondary education, while upper-secondary abandonment was 11.3% in 2023-24. INEGI separately found 18.6% of the population in educational lag in 2024.

For Mexico, basic-school reach is high but capability is not universal. SEP reported 2024-25 coverage of 99.5% in primary, 93.1% in secondary and 80.6% in upper-secondary education, while upper-secondary abandonment was 11.3% in 2023-24. INEGI separately found 18.6% of the population in educational lag in 2024.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.05 + -17.01 + -20.23 + -8.16 = -56.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +48.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +48.3. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -56.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+48.3 Original evidence category score+48.3 Contribution to national evidence score+3.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 26.25 + -8.75 + 8.25 = 48.25

Base: 48.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +48.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 48.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.98 points

For Mexico, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — education-human-capability domestic evidence retained

For Mexico, basic-school reach is high but capability is not universal. SEP reported 2024-25 coverage of 99.5% in primary, 93.1% in secondary and 80.6% in upper-secondary education, while upper-secondary abandonment was 11.3% in 2023-24. INEGI separately found 18.6% of the population in educational lag in 2024.

2026-10-11 SEP — Principales Cifras 2024-2025 · INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024
2026 full review — Mexico — education-human-capability domestic evidence retained

For Mexico, basic-school reach is high but capability is not universal. SEP reported 2024-25 coverage of 99.5% in primary, 93.1% in secondary and 80.6% in upper-secondary education, while upper-secondary abandonment was 11.3% in 2023-24. INEGI separately found 18.6% of the population in educational lag in 2024.

2026-10-11 SEP — Principales Cifras 2024-2025 · INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024
Mexico: Education Human Capability research finding

For Mexico, basic-school reach is high but capability is not universal. SEP reported 2024-25 coverage of 99.5% in primary, 93.1% in secondary and 80.6% in upper-secondary education, while upper-secondary abandonment was 11.3% in 2023-24. INEGI separately found 18.6% of the population in educational lag in 2024.

2025-08-13 SEP — Principales Cifras 2024-2025 · INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-60.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +34.0

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-60.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-45.7× 25%= -11.4 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -45.7 × 25% = -11.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico has extensive road, air, rail, bus and urban-transit capacity, but national door-to-door reach and time burden are uneven. ENUT 2024 explicitly measures commuting time as part of work-related time, and official transport systems show substantial capacity; the live review did not find one current national metric that can stand in for affordability, reliability and travel time across all settlement types.

Mexico has extensive road, air, rail, bus and urban-transit capacity, but national door-to-door reach and time burden are uneven. ENUT 2024 explicitly measures commuting time as part of work-related time, and official transport systems show substantial capacity; the live review did not find one current national metric that can stand in for affordability, reliability and travel time across all settlement types.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-54.5× 35%= -19.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -54.5 × 35% = -19.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico has extensive road, air, rail, bus and urban-transit capacity, but national door-to-door reach and time burden are uneven. ENUT 2024 explicitly measures commuting time as part of work-related time, and official transport systems show substantial capacity; the live review did not find one current national metric that can stand in for affordability, reliability and travel time across all settlement types.

Mexico has extensive road, air, rail, bus and urban-transit capacity, but national door-to-door reach and time burden are uneven. ENUT 2024 explicitly measures commuting time as part of work-related time, and official transport systems show substantial capacity; the live review did not find one current national metric that can stand in for affordability, reliability and travel time across all settlement types.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-85.3× 25%= -21.3 points
Exact point calculation

-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points

Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.0; Money-gated reading -85.3 × 25% = -21.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico has extensive road, air, rail, bus and urban-transit capacity, but national door-to-door reach and time burden are uneven. ENUT 2024 explicitly measures commuting time as part of work-related time, and official transport systems show substantial capacity; the live review did not find one current national metric that can stand in for affordability, reliability and travel time across all settlement types.

Mexico has extensive road, air, rail, bus and urban-transit capacity, but national door-to-door reach and time burden are uneven. ENUT 2024 explicitly measures commuting time as part of work-related time, and official transport systems show substantial capacity; the live review did not find one current national metric that can stand in for affordability, reliability and travel time across all settlement types.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-58.9× 15%= -8.8 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -58.9 × 15% = -8.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Mexico has extensive road, air, rail, bus and urban-transit capacity, but national door-to-door reach and time burden are uneven. ENUT 2024 explicitly measures commuting time as part of work-related time, and official transport systems show substantial capacity; the live review did not find one current national metric that can stand in for affordability, reliability and travel time across all settlement types.

Mexico has extensive road, air, rail, bus and urban-transit capacity, but national door-to-door reach and time burden are uneven. ENUT 2024 explicitly measures commuting time as part of work-related time, and official transport systems show substantial capacity; the live review did not find one current national metric that can stand in for affordability, reliability and travel time across all settlement types.

Mexico has extensive road, air, rail, bus and urban-transit capacity, but national door-to-door reach and time burden are uneven. ENUT 2024 explicitly measures commuting time as part of work-related time, and official transport systems show substantial capacity; the live review did not find one current national metric that can stand in for affordability, reliability and travel time across all settlement types.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.41 + -19.06 + -21.33 + -8.84 = -60.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +34.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +34.0. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -60.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+34.0 Original evidence category score+34.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 19.25 + -12.50 + 6.00 = 34.00

Base: 34.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +34.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 34.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.40 points

For Mexico, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +30.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — mobility-reachability domestic evidence retained

Mexico has extensive road, air, rail, bus and urban-transit capacity, but national door-to-door reach and time burden are uneven. ENUT 2024 explicitly measures commuting time as part of work-related time, and official transport systems show substantial capacity; the live review did not find one current national metric that can stand in for affordability, reliability and travel time across all settlement types.

2026-10-11 INEGI — Encuesta Nacional sobre Uso del Tiempo 2024 · INEGI — Parque vehicular
2026 full review — Mexico — mobility-reachability domestic evidence retained

Mexico has extensive road, air, rail, bus and urban-transit capacity, but national door-to-door reach and time burden are uneven. ENUT 2024 explicitly measures commuting time as part of work-related time, and official transport systems show substantial capacity; the live review did not find one current national metric that can stand in for affordability, reliability and travel time across all settlement types.

2026-10-11 INEGI — Encuesta Nacional sobre Uso del Tiempo 2024 · INEGI — Parque vehicular
Mexico: Mobility Reachability research finding

Mexico has extensive road, air, rail, bus and urban-transit capacity, but national door-to-door reach and time burden are uneven. ENUT 2024 explicitly measures commuting time as part of work-related time, and official transport systems show substantial capacity; the live review did not find one current national metric that can stand in for affordability, reliability and travel time across all settlement types.

2025-08-28 INEGI — Encuesta Nacional sobre Uso del Tiempo 2024 · INEGI — Parque vehicular
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-92.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence -72.8

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-92.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-83.8× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -83.8 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, family support is substantial but still highly conditional on income, programme eligibility and unpaid household labour. In 2024, 48.2% of the population lacked social-security access and 35.4% had income below the poverty line for food plus non-food needs. ENUT also records a 21.5-hour weekly gender gap in unpaid domestic and care work.

For Mexico, family support is substantial but still highly conditional on income, programme eligibility and unpaid household labour. In 2024, 48.2% of the population lacked social-security access and 35.4% had income below the poverty line for food plus non-food needs. ENUT also records a 21.5-hour weekly gender gap in unpaid domestic and care work.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-91.2× 35%= -31.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -91.2 × 35% = -31.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, family support is substantial but still highly conditional on income, programme eligibility and unpaid household labour. In 2024, 48.2% of the population lacked social-security access and 35.4% had income below the poverty line for food plus non-food needs. ENUT also records a 21.5-hour weekly gender gap in unpaid domestic and care work.

For Mexico, family support is substantial but still highly conditional on income, programme eligibility and unpaid household labour. In 2024, 48.2% of the population lacked social-security access and 35.4% had income below the poverty line for food plus non-food needs. ENUT also records a 21.5-hour weekly gender gap in unpaid domestic and care work.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-100.0× 25%= -25.0 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -100.0; Money-gated reading -100.0 × 25% = -25.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, family support is substantial but still highly conditional on income, programme eligibility and unpaid household labour. In 2024, 48.2% of the population lacked social-security access and 35.4% had income below the poverty line for food plus non-food needs. ENUT also records a 21.5-hour weekly gender gap in unpaid domestic and care work.

For Mexico, family support is substantial but still highly conditional on income, programme eligibility and unpaid household labour. In 2024, 48.2% of the population lacked social-security access and 35.4% had income below the poverty line for food plus non-food needs. ENUT also records a 21.5-hour weekly gender gap in unpaid domestic and care work.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-94.1× 15%= -14.1 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -80.0; Money-gated reading -94.1 × 15% = -14.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mexico, family support is substantial but still highly conditional on income, programme eligibility and unpaid household labour. In 2024, 48.2% of the population lacked social-security access and 35.4% had income below the poverty line for food plus non-food needs. ENUT also records a 21.5-hour weekly gender gap in unpaid domestic and care work.

For Mexico, family support is substantial but still highly conditional on income, programme eligibility and unpaid household labour. In 2024, 48.2% of the population lacked social-security access and 35.4% had income below the poverty line for food plus non-food needs. ENUT also records a 21.5-hour weekly gender gap in unpaid domestic and care work.

For Mexico, family support is substantial but still highly conditional on income, programme eligibility and unpaid household labour. In 2024, 48.2% of the population lacked social-security access and 35.4% had income below the poverty line for food plus non-food needs. ENUT also records a 21.5-hour weekly gender gap in unpaid domestic and care work.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.96 + -31.92 + -25.00 + -14.12 = -92.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +27.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -100.0. Effective evidence: -72.8. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -92.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+27.3 TBF marriage-law policy deduction−50 Original evidence category score-22.8 Contribution to national evidence score-1.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 6.00 = 27.25

Base: 27.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −50.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -22.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -22.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = -1.87 points

For Mexico, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +27.3

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Same-sex marriage legally recognized

Reported effective year: 2022

Deduction calculation: 50 × 1 = −50 points

Final category calculation: +27.3 − 50 = -22.8 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Nationwide same-sex marriage recognition recorded by Pew Research Center; this is a legal-status observation, not a measured fertility effect.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2025-06-02 · Reviewed: 2026-10-09

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — family-formation-stability domestic evidence retained

For Mexico, family support is substantial but still highly conditional on income, programme eligibility and unpaid household labour. In 2024, 48.2% of the population lacked social-security access and 35.4% had income below the poverty line for food plus non-food needs. ENUT also records a 21.5-hour weekly gender gap in unpaid domestic and care work.

2026-10-11 INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024 · INEGI — Encuesta Nacional sobre Uso del Tiempo 2024
2026 full review — Mexico — family-formation-stability domestic evidence retained

For Mexico, family support is substantial but still highly conditional on income, programme eligibility and unpaid household labour. In 2024, 48.2% of the population lacked social-security access and 35.4% had income below the poverty line for food plus non-food needs. ENUT also records a 21.5-hour weekly gender gap in unpaid domestic and care work.

2026-10-11 INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024 · INEGI — Encuesta Nacional sobre Uso del Tiempo 2024
Mexico: Family Formation Stability research finding

For Mexico, family support is substantial but still highly conditional on income, programme eligibility and unpaid household labour. In 2024, 48.2% of the population lacked social-security access and 35.4% had income below the poverty line for food plus non-food needs. ENUT also records a 21.5-hour weekly gender gap in unpaid domestic and care work.

2025-08-28 INEGI — Pobreza Multidimensional 2024 · INEGI — Encuesta Nacional sobre Uso del Tiempo 2024
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-64.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +20.3

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-64.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-45.7× 25%= -11.4 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -45.7 × 25% = -11.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico has enormous territorial and rural-production capacity, but territory is not the same as ordinary serviced land access. ENIGH 2024 tracks tenure and housing expenditure, while the latest detailed national tenure release shows a mix of owned, still-being-paid, rented and other tenure. Price, title, location and infrastructure remain substantial gates, so this category is scored conservatively.

Mexico has enormous territorial and rural-production capacity, but territory is not the same as ordinary serviced land access. ENIGH 2024 tracks tenure and housing expenditure, while the latest detailed national tenure release shows a mix of owned, still-being-paid, rented and other tenure. Price, title, location and infrastructure remain substantial gates, so this category is scored conservatively.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-61.8× 35%= -21.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

30.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -61.8 × 35% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico has enormous territorial and rural-production capacity, but territory is not the same as ordinary serviced land access. ENIGH 2024 tracks tenure and housing expenditure, while the latest detailed national tenure release shows a mix of owned, still-being-paid, rented and other tenure. Price, title, location and infrastructure remain substantial gates, so this category is scored conservatively.

Mexico has enormous territorial and rural-production capacity, but territory is not the same as ordinary serviced land access. ENIGH 2024 tracks tenure and housing expenditure, while the latest detailed national tenure release shows a mix of owned, still-being-paid, rented and other tenure. Price, title, location and infrastructure remain substantial gates, so this category is scored conservatively.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-91.2× 25%= -22.8 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Original evidence -70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -91.2 × 25% = -22.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico has enormous territorial and rural-production capacity, but territory is not the same as ordinary serviced land access. ENIGH 2024 tracks tenure and housing expenditure, while the latest detailed national tenure release shows a mix of owned, still-being-paid, rented and other tenure. Price, title, location and infrastructure remain substantial gates, so this category is scored conservatively.

Mexico has enormous territorial and rural-production capacity, but territory is not the same as ordinary serviced land access. ENIGH 2024 tracks tenure and housing expenditure, while the latest detailed national tenure release shows a mix of owned, still-being-paid, rented and other tenure. Price, title, location and infrastructure remain substantial gates, so this category is scored conservatively.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-58.9× 15%= -8.8 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -58.9 × 15% = -8.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Mexico has enormous territorial and rural-production capacity, but territory is not the same as ordinary serviced land access. ENIGH 2024 tracks tenure and housing expenditure, while the latest detailed national tenure release shows a mix of owned, still-being-paid, rented and other tenure. Price, title, location and infrastructure remain substantial gates, so this category is scored conservatively.

Mexico has enormous territorial and rural-production capacity, but territory is not the same as ordinary serviced land access. ENIGH 2024 tracks tenure and housing expenditure, while the latest detailed national tenure release shows a mix of owned, still-being-paid, rented and other tenure. Price, title, location and infrastructure remain substantial gates, so this category is scored conservatively.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.41 + -21.63 + -22.80 + -8.84 = -64.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +20.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +20.3. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+20.3 Original evidence category score+20.3 Contribution to national evidence score+1.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 10.50 + -17.50 + 6.00 = 20.25

Base: 20.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +20.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 20.25 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.04 points

For Mexico, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +55.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — land-spatial-freedom domestic evidence retained

Mexico has enormous territorial and rural-production capacity, but territory is not the same as ordinary serviced land access. ENIGH 2024 tracks tenure and housing expenditure, while the latest detailed national tenure release shows a mix of owned, still-being-paid, rented and other tenure. Price, title, location and infrastructure remain substantial gates, so this category is scored conservatively.

2026-10-11 INEGI — ENIGH 2024 · INEGI — Vivienda y tenencia
Mexico: Land Spatial Freedom research finding

Mexico has enormous territorial and rural-production capacity, but territory is not the same as ordinary serviced land access. ENIGH 2024 tracks tenure and housing expenditure, while the latest detailed national tenure release shows a mix of owned, still-being-paid, rented and other tenure. Price, title, location and infrastructure remain substantial gates, so this category is scored conservatively.

2025-07-30 INEGI — ENIGH 2024 · INEGI — Vivienda y tenencia
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-60.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +36.0

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-60.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-42.7× 25%= -10.7 points
Exact point calculation

95.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 23.75 weighted points

Original evidence +95.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +95.0; Money-gated reading -42.7 × 25% = -10.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico has exceptional coastlines, forests, mountains, parks and cultural landscapes, but everyday peace of mind is heavily constrained by insecurity. In June 2026, 59.8% of adults in 91 surveyed urban areas considered their city unsafe. At the same time, CONANP reports roughly 98 million hectares in 232 federal protected areas.

Mexico has exceptional coastlines, forests, mountains, parks and cultural landscapes, but everyday peace of mind is heavily constrained by insecurity. In June 2026, 59.8% of adults in 91 surveyed urban areas considered their city unsafe. At the same time, CONANP reports roughly 98 million hectares in 232 federal protected areas.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-54.5× 35%= -19.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -54.5 × 35% = -19.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico has exceptional coastlines, forests, mountains, parks and cultural landscapes, but everyday peace of mind is heavily constrained by insecurity. In June 2026, 59.8% of adults in 91 surveyed urban areas considered their city unsafe. At the same time, CONANP reports roughly 98 million hectares in 232 federal protected areas.

Mexico has exceptional coastlines, forests, mountains, parks and cultural landscapes, but everyday peace of mind is heavily constrained by insecurity. In June 2026, 59.8% of adults in 91 surveyed urban areas considered their city unsafe. At the same time, CONANP reports roughly 98 million hectares in 232 federal protected areas.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-91.2× 25%= -22.8 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Original evidence -70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -91.2 × 25% = -22.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico has exceptional coastlines, forests, mountains, parks and cultural landscapes, but everyday peace of mind is heavily constrained by insecurity. In June 2026, 59.8% of adults in 91 surveyed urban areas considered their city unsafe. At the same time, CONANP reports roughly 98 million hectares in 232 federal protected areas.

Mexico has exceptional coastlines, forests, mountains, parks and cultural landscapes, but everyday peace of mind is heavily constrained by insecurity. In June 2026, 59.8% of adults in 91 surveyed urban areas considered their city unsafe. At the same time, CONANP reports roughly 98 million hectares in 232 federal protected areas.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-50.1× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -50.1 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Mexico has exceptional coastlines, forests, mountains, parks and cultural landscapes, but everyday peace of mind is heavily constrained by insecurity. In June 2026, 59.8% of adults in 91 surveyed urban areas considered their city unsafe. At the same time, CONANP reports roughly 98 million hectares in 232 federal protected areas.

Mexico has exceptional coastlines, forests, mountains, parks and cultural landscapes, but everyday peace of mind is heavily constrained by insecurity. In June 2026, 59.8% of adults in 91 surveyed urban areas considered their city unsafe. At the same time, CONANP reports roughly 98 million hectares in 232 federal protected areas.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.68 + -19.06 + -22.80 + -7.51 = -60.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +36.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +36.0. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -60.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+36.0 Original evidence category score+36.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 23.75 + 19.25 + -17.50 + 10.50 = 36.00

Base: 36.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +36.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 36.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.22 points

For Mexico, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +40.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — peace-beauty-delight domestic evidence retained

Mexico has exceptional coastlines, forests, mountains, parks and cultural landscapes, but everyday peace of mind is heavily constrained by insecurity. In June 2026, 59.8% of adults in 91 surveyed urban areas considered their city unsafe. At the same time, CONANP reports roughly 98 million hectares in 232 federal protected areas.

2026-10-11 INEGI — ENSU, second quarter 2026 · CONANP — Áreas Naturales Protegidas
Mexico: Peace Beauty Delight research finding

Mexico has exceptional coastlines, forests, mountains, parks and cultural landscapes, but everyday peace of mind is heavily constrained by insecurity. In June 2026, 59.8% of adults in 91 surveyed urban areas considered their city unsafe. At the same time, CONANP reports roughly 98 million hectares in 232 federal protected areas.

2026-07-24 INEGI — ENSU, second quarter 2026 · CONANP — Áreas Naturales Protegidas
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-60.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +33.0

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-60.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-45.7× 25%= -11.4 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -45.7 × 25% = -11.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico retains very large ecological assets: CONANP reports 232 federal protected areas covering roughly 98 million hectares, including major marine areas. Resilience pressure remains real, including drought and water stress tracked through CONAGUA national monitoring. Protected acreage is therefore a strong base, not proof that ecological function is secure everywhere.

Mexico retains very large ecological assets: CONANP reports 232 federal protected areas covering roughly 98 million hectares, including major marine areas. Resilience pressure remains real, including drought and water stress tracked through CONAGUA national monitoring. Protected acreage is therefore a strong base, not proof that ecological function is secure everywhere.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-54.5× 35%= -19.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -54.5 × 35% = -19.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico retains very large ecological assets: CONANP reports 232 federal protected areas covering roughly 98 million hectares, including major marine areas. Resilience pressure remains real, including drought and water stress tracked through CONAGUA national monitoring. Protected acreage is therefore a strong base, not proof that ecological function is secure everywhere.

Mexico retains very large ecological assets: CONANP reports 232 federal protected areas covering roughly 98 million hectares, including major marine areas. Resilience pressure remains real, including drought and water stress tracked through CONAGUA national monitoring. Protected acreage is therefore a strong base, not proof that ecological function is secure everywhere.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-88.3× 25%= -22.1 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -88.3 × 25% = -22.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico retains very large ecological assets: CONANP reports 232 federal protected areas covering roughly 98 million hectares, including major marine areas. Resilience pressure remains real, including drought and water stress tracked through CONAGUA national monitoring. Protected acreage is therefore a strong base, not proof that ecological function is secure everywhere.

Mexico retains very large ecological assets: CONANP reports 232 federal protected areas covering roughly 98 million hectares, including major marine areas. Resilience pressure remains real, including drought and water stress tracked through CONAGUA national monitoring. Protected acreage is therefore a strong base, not proof that ecological function is secure everywhere.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-55.9× 15%= -8.4 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -55.9 × 15% = -8.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Mexico retains very large ecological assets: CONANP reports 232 federal protected areas covering roughly 98 million hectares, including major marine areas. Resilience pressure remains real, including drought and water stress tracked through CONAGUA national monitoring. Protected acreage is therefore a strong base, not proof that ecological function is secure everywhere.

Mexico retains very large ecological assets: CONANP reports 232 federal protected areas covering roughly 98 million hectares, including major marine areas. Resilience pressure remains real, including drought and water stress tracked through CONAGUA national monitoring. Protected acreage is therefore a strong base, not proof that ecological function is secure everywhere.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.41 + -19.06 + -22.06 + -8.40 = -60.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +33.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +33.0. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -60.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+33.0 Original evidence category score+33.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 19.25 + -15.00 + 7.50 = 33.00

Base: 33.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +33.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 33.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.04 points

For Mexico, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +30.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — living-ground-resilience domestic evidence retained

Mexico retains very large ecological assets: CONANP reports 232 federal protected areas covering roughly 98 million hectares, including major marine areas. Resilience pressure remains real, including drought and water stress tracked through CONAGUA national monitoring. Protected acreage is therefore a strong base, not proof that ecological function is secure everywhere.

2026-10-11 CONANP — Información Espacial de Áreas Naturales Protegidas · CONAGUA/SMN — Monitor de Sequía en México
Mexico: Living Ground Resilience research finding

Mexico retains very large ecological assets: CONANP reports 232 federal protected areas covering roughly 98 million hectares, including major marine areas. Resilience pressure remains real, including drought and water stress tracked through CONAGUA national monitoring. Protected acreage is therefore a strong base, not proof that ecological function is secure everywhere.

2026-07-01 CONANP — Información Espacial de Áreas Naturales Protegidas · CONAGUA/SMN — Monitor de Sequía en México
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-66.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +13.5

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-66.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-48.6× 25%= -12.2 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -48.6 × 25% = -12.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, justice and safety are major abundance constraints. ENVIPE 2026 estimates 23.0 million adult crime victims in 2025 and 33.8 million crimes; 93.4% were not reported or did not lead to an investigation file. This indicates substantial victimization plus severe institutional friction between harm and usable justice.

For Mexico, justice and safety are major abundance constraints. ENVIPE 2026 estimates 23.0 million adult crime victims in 2025 and 33.8 million crimes; 93.4% were not reported or did not lead to an investigation file. This indicates substantial victimization plus severe institutional friction between harm and usable justice.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-60.3× 35%= -21.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -60.3 × 35% = -21.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, justice and safety are major abundance constraints. ENVIPE 2026 estimates 23.0 million adult crime victims in 2025 and 33.8 million crimes; 93.4% were not reported or did not lead to an investigation file. This indicates substantial victimization plus severe institutional friction between harm and usable justice.

For Mexico, justice and safety are major abundance constraints. ENVIPE 2026 estimates 23.0 million adult crime victims in 2025 and 33.8 million crimes; 93.4% were not reported or did not lead to an investigation file. This indicates substantial victimization plus severe institutional friction between harm and usable justice.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-95.6× 25%= -23.9 points
Exact point calculation

-85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -21.25 weighted points

Original evidence -85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -85.0; Money-gated reading -95.6 × 25% = -23.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Mexico, justice and safety are major abundance constraints. ENVIPE 2026 estimates 23.0 million adult crime victims in 2025 and 33.8 million crimes; 93.4% were not reported or did not lead to an investigation file. This indicates substantial victimization plus severe institutional friction between harm and usable justice.

For Mexico, justice and safety are major abundance constraints. ENVIPE 2026 estimates 23.0 million adult crime victims in 2025 and 33.8 million crimes; 93.4% were not reported or did not lead to an investigation file. This indicates substantial victimization plus severe institutional friction between harm and usable justice.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-63.3× 15%= -9.5 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -63.3 × 15% = -9.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mexico, justice and safety are major abundance constraints. ENVIPE 2026 estimates 23.0 million adult crime victims in 2025 and 33.8 million crimes; 93.4% were not reported or did not lead to an investigation file. This indicates substantial victimization plus severe institutional friction between harm and usable justice.

For Mexico, justice and safety are major abundance constraints. ENVIPE 2026 estimates 23.0 million adult crime victims in 2025 and 33.8 million crimes; 93.4% were not reported or did not lead to an investigation file. This indicates substantial victimization plus severe institutional friction between harm and usable justice.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.15 + -21.12 + -23.90 + -9.49 = -66.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +13.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +13.5. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -66.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+13.5 Original evidence category score+13.5 Contribution to national evidence score+0.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 12.25 + -21.25 + 3.75 = 13.50

Base: 13.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +13.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 13.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 0.70 points

For Mexico, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +40.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — justice-safety-friction domestic evidence retained

For Mexico, justice and safety are major abundance constraints. ENVIPE 2026 estimates 23.0 million adult crime victims in 2025 and 33.8 million crimes; 93.4% were not reported or did not lead to an investigation file. This indicates substantial victimization plus severe institutional friction between harm and usable justice.

2026-10-11 INEGI — ENVIPE 2026 · INEGI — ENSU 2026
Mexico: Justice Safety Friction research finding

For Mexico, justice and safety are major abundance constraints. ENVIPE 2026 estimates 23.0 million adult crime victims in 2025 and 33.8 million crimes; 93.4% were not reported or did not lead to an investigation file. This indicates substantial victimization plus severe institutional friction between harm and usable justice.

2026-09-01 INEGI — ENVIPE 2026 · INEGI — ENSU 2026
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-63.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence +24.3

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-63.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-48.6× 25%= -12.2 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -48.6 × 25% = -12.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico now has a current national waste diagnosis. SEMARNAT reports about 139,902 tonnes of municipal solid waste generated per day and identifies infrastructure, recovery, valuation, governance and financing gaps. The system has formal circular-economy and recovery programmes, but material return is far from closing the national waste loop.

Mexico now has a current national waste diagnosis. SEMARNAT reports about 139,902 tonnes of municipal solid waste generated per day and identifies infrastructure, recovery, valuation, governance and financing gaps. The system has formal circular-economy and recovery programmes, but material return is far from closing the national waste loop.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.4× 35%= -20.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -57.4 × 35% = -20.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico now has a current national waste diagnosis. SEMARNAT reports about 139,902 tonnes of municipal solid waste generated per day and identifies infrastructure, recovery, valuation, governance and financing gaps. The system has formal circular-economy and recovery programmes, but material return is far from closing the national waste loop.

Mexico now has a current national waste diagnosis. SEMARNAT reports about 139,902 tonnes of municipal solid waste generated per day and identifies infrastructure, recovery, valuation, governance and financing gaps. The system has formal circular-economy and recovery programmes, but material return is far from closing the national waste loop.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-89.7× 25%= -22.4 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -89.7 × 25% = -22.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mexico now has a current national waste diagnosis. SEMARNAT reports about 139,902 tonnes of municipal solid waste generated per day and identifies infrastructure, recovery, valuation, governance and financing gaps. The system has formal circular-economy and recovery programmes, but material return is far from closing the national waste loop.

Mexico now has a current national waste diagnosis. SEMARNAT reports about 139,902 tonnes of municipal solid waste generated per day and identifies infrastructure, recovery, valuation, governance and financing gaps. The system has formal circular-economy and recovery programmes, but material return is far from closing the national waste loop.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.9× 15%= -8.8 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -58.9 × 15% = -8.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Mexico now has a current national waste diagnosis. SEMARNAT reports about 139,902 tonnes of municipal solid waste generated per day and identifies infrastructure, recovery, valuation, governance and financing gaps. The system has formal circular-economy and recovery programmes, but material return is far from closing the national waste loop.

Mexico now has a current national waste diagnosis. SEMARNAT reports about 139,902 tonnes of municipal solid waste generated per day and identifies infrastructure, recovery, valuation, governance and financing gaps. The system has formal circular-economy and recovery programmes, but material return is far from closing the national waste loop.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.15 + -20.09 + -22.43 + -8.83 = -63.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +24.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +24.3. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+24.3 Original evidence category score+24.3 Contribution to national evidence score+1.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 15.75 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 24.25

Base: 24.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +24.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 24.25 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.00 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

For Mexico, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +30.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — durability-material-return domestic evidence retained

Mexico now has a current national waste diagnosis. SEMARNAT reports about 139,902 tonnes of municipal solid waste generated per day and identifies infrastructure, recovery, valuation, governance and financing gaps. The system has formal circular-economy and recovery programmes, but material return is far from closing the national waste loop.

2026-10-11 SEMARNAT — Diagnóstico Básico para la Gestión Integral de los Residuos 2026 · SEMARNAT — Prevención y gestión integral de los residuos
Mexico: Durability Material Return research finding

Mexico now has a current national waste diagnosis. SEMARNAT reports about 139,902 tonnes of municipal solid waste generated per day and identifies infrastructure, recovery, valuation, governance and financing gaps. The system has formal circular-economy and recovery programmes, but material return is far from closing the national waste loop.

2026-06-01 SEMARNAT — Diagnóstico Básico para la Gestión Integral de los Residuos 2026 · SEMARNAT — Prevención y gestión integral de los residuos
6% weight International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
-57.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +43.3

International score breakdown

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

-57.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Entry Accessibility 25%
See all nine International Welcome Entry Accessibility scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-51.5× 25%= -12.9 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -51.5 × 25% = -12.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Mexico publishes country-specific visitor visa exemption lists; those entries do not create a settlement or work right.

🤔
Migrant Practical Life 30%
See all nine International Welcome Migrant Practical Life scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-60.3× 30%= -18.1 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -60.3 × 30% = -18.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mexico, uNHCR reports substantial refugee and asylum-seeker populations and formal efforts to assist integration; the reach is not yet universal.

🤔
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome 25%
See all nine International Welcome Refugee / Neighbour Welcome scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.3× 25%= -14.6 points
Exact point calculation

42.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +42.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +42.0; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 25% = -14.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Mexico receives refugees and asylum seekers including people from Latin America; UNHCR publishes the caseload and protection activities.

🤔
Flexibility / Continuity 20%
See all nine International Welcome Flexibility / Continuity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-61.8× 20%= -12.4 points
Exact point calculation

30.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -61.8 × 20% = -12.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mexico, humanitarian integration and continuing support exist, but the asylum caseload does not prove permanent family security for every arrival.

Factual and deliberately unscored. Mexico maintains visa-exemption, visitor-visa and electronic-visa pathways, including an electronic-visa route for eligible Brazilian air travellers in 2026. Entry remains conditional on nationality, documentation, eligibility and fees; the country pack does not convert that policy mix into a judgment-dependent score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.88 + -18.10 + -14.57 + -12.37 = -57.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +43.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +43.3. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -57.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+43.3 Original evidence category score+43.3 Contribution to national evidence score+2.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 16.25 + 10.50 + 10.50 + 6.00 = 43.25

Base: 43.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +43.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 43.25 × (6.00 × 76.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.03 points

For Mexico, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 76% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.56%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — Flexibility / Continuity (international-access-human-welcome)

For Mexico, humanitarian integration and continuing support exist, but the asylum caseload does not prove permanent family security for every arrival.

2026-10-11 UNHCR Mexico
2026 full review — Mexico — Refugee / Neighbour Welcome (international-access-human-welcome)

Mexico receives refugees and asylum seekers including people from Latin America; UNHCR publishes the caseload and protection activities.

2026-10-11 UNHCR Mexico
2026 full review — Mexico — Migrant Practical Life (international-access-human-welcome)

For Mexico, uNHCR reports substantial refugee and asylum-seeker populations and formal efforts to assist integration; the reach is not yet universal.

2026-10-11 UNHCR Mexico
2026 full review — Mexico — Entry Accessibility (international-access-human-welcome)

Mexico publishes country-specific visitor visa exemption lists; those entries do not create a settlement or work right.

2026-10-11 Instituto Nacional de Migración
Mexico: International Access Human Welcome research finding

Factual and deliberately unscored. Mexico maintains visa-exemption, visitor-visa and electronic-visa pathways, including an electronic-visa route for eligible Brazilian air travellers in 2026. Entry remains conditional on nationality, documentation, eligibility and fees; the country pack does not convert that policy mix into a judgment-dependent score.

2026-09-01 SRE — Portal Visas Mexicanas: Visitante · SRE — Motivo de viaje: turismo
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-60.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence +35.0

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-60.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Positive Contribution 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-53.6× 25%= -13.4 points
Exact point calculation

58.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 14.50 weighted points

Original evidence +58.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +58.0; Money-gated reading -53.6 × 25% = -13.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mexico, aMEXCID reports more than 150 cooperation projects spanning mobility, agriculture, climate, education and technology in 2025.

🤔
Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-51.5× 25%= -12.9 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -51.5 × 25% = -12.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

A Mexico-Chile joint fund approved thirteen bilateral projects with stated mutual benefit; funding awards are not verified finished outcomes.

🤔
Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-70.6× 35%= -24.7 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -70.6 × 35% = -24.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mexico, aMEXCID's project counts alone do not offer an independent country-wide audit of adverse effects or exploitation. No unsupported harm figure is assigned.

🤔
Accountability / Repair 15%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-62.4× 15%= -9.4 points
Exact point calculation

28.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 4.20 weighted points

Original evidence +28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +28.0; Money-gated reading -62.4 × 15% = -9.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mexico, aMEXCID describes project governance and partnerships, while a complete independent repair ledger remains unverified.

For Mexico, factual and deliberately unscored. Government infrastructure data report that roughly 75% of 2025 electricity generation was fossil and 25% clean, while expansion plans include additional clean capacity. A complete consumption-based emissions, imported-material and cross-border ecological footprint ledger was not established in this integration, so no overall external-conduct judgment is assigned.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.40 + -12.88 + -24.72 + -9.36 = -60.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +35.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -41.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -60.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+35.0 Original evidence category score+35.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 14.50 + 16.25 + 0.00 + 4.20 = 34.95

Base: 34.95 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 34.95 × (6.00 × 76.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.64 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Exported waste / garbageAudit pending
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

For Mexico, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 76% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.56%. After normalization across Mexico’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Mexico — Accountability / Repair (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For Mexico, aMEXCID describes project governance and partnerships, while a complete independent repair ledger remains unverified.

2026-10-11 Mexico-Chile cooperation fund
2026 full review — Mexico — Documented Harm / Extraction (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For Mexico, aMEXCID's project counts alone do not offer an independent country-wide audit of adverse effects or exploitation. No unsupported harm figure is assigned.

2026-10-11 AMEXCID annual cooperation update
2026 full review — Mexico — Mutuality / Local Benefit (external-footprint-non-extractive)

A Mexico-Chile joint fund approved thirteen bilateral projects with stated mutual benefit; funding awards are not verified finished outcomes.

2026-10-11 AMEXCID / AGCID joint fund
2026 full review — Mexico — Positive Contribution (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For Mexico, aMEXCID reports more than 150 cooperation projects spanning mobility, agriculture, climate, education and technology in 2025.

2026-10-11 AMEXCID official 2025 report
Mexico: External Footprint Non Extractive research finding

For Mexico, factual and deliberately unscored. Government infrastructure data report that roughly 75% of 2025 electricity generation was fossil and 25% clean, while expansion plans include additional clean capacity. A complete consumption-based emissions, imported-material and cross-border ecological footprint ledger was not established in this integration, so no overall external-conduct judgment is assigned.

2025-12-31 Proyectos México — Electricidad, generación 2025 · CONANP — Programa Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas 2026-2030

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.