Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Togo 🇹🇬

Togo currently ranks #168 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -68.15. This country is under the national Money Gate, strongest in Welcome and weakest in Repair across 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Data updatedResearch package completed
TBF Abundance Score
-68.2
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: +18.1 · Money Gate: 1.58/20 · Headline: -68.2.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#168of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

TogoLast recorded move: down from #167 to #168.Recent recorded movements
  1. #167 → #16821 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500
  2. #166 → #16721 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500
  3. #156 → #16620 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #156 → #15920 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 50: rank 172. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 50: rank 176. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 50: rank 176. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 9 Oct 2026 · 07:51 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 50: rank 174. 9 Oct 2026 · 12:04 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 50: rank 175. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 50: rank 173. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 50: rank 173. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 50: rank 172. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 50: rank 171. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 50: rank 172. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 50: rank 171. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 50: rank 170. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 50: rank 171. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 50: rank 172. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 50: rank 171. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 50: rank 170. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 50: rank 169. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 50: rank 168. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 50: rank 167. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 50: rank 166. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 50: rank 171. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 50: rank 170. 18 Oct 2026 · 06:33 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 06:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 50: rank 169. 18 Oct 2026 · 11:57 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 50: rank 168. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 50: rank 167. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 50: rank 166. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 50: rank 165. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 50: rank 164. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 50: rank 163. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 50: rank 162. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 50: rank 161. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 50: rank 160. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 50: rank 159. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 50: rank 158. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 50: rank 157. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 50: rank 156. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 50: rank 155. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 50: rank 154. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 50: rank 153. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 50: rank 152. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 50: rank 151. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 50: rank 150. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 50: rank 149. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 50: rank 148. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 45 of 50: rank 240. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 46 of 50: rank 239. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 16:49 GMT-0500Recorded period 47 of 50: rank 156. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 48 of 50: rank 159. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 49 of 50: rank 167. 21 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500Recorded period 50 of 50: rank 168. 21 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500NOW #168Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

100%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% = 100.00% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#147

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

— Pending

Food

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Housing / Land

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Healthcare

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Transportation

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Water / Energy

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

Money Gate · Five essentials
  • FoodPending
  • Housing / LandPending
  • HealthcarePending
  • TransportationPending
  • Water / EnergyPending
  • Money still neededNot measured

The existing transitional gate estimate is not split into invented category scores. Five direct category audits are still needed.

Why this reading is pending

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Five separate Money Gate components inform this reading.

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
83.8 / 100
Why 83.8 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -67.49) ÷ 2 = 83.75 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-46.1
Why -46.1?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 1.58 = -46.1

The transitional value is derived from published domestic Reach and Friction rails only to preserve historical ordering. It is not a substitute for the five direct 0–4 gate findings above and can never clear the Money Gate.

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-69.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +13.8

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-69.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 25%= -14.6 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 25% = -14.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Togo, no reliable current national average-hours measure was secured. Agriculture employs about 60% of the labour force and household service burdens remain substantial, so time abundance cannot be inferred from employment or GDP.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-63.6× 35%= -22.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.6 × 35% = -22.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, no reliable current national average-hours measure was secured. Agriculture employs about 60% of the labour force and household service burdens remain substantial, so time abundance cannot be inferred from employment or GDP.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-91.9× 25%= -23.0 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Original evidence -70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -91.9 × 25% = -23.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, no reliable current national average-hours measure was secured. Agriculture employs about 60% of the labour force and household service burdens remain substantial, so time abundance cannot be inferred from employment or GDP.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-63.6× 15%= -9.5 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.6 × 15% = -9.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, no reliable current national average-hours measure was secured. Agriculture employs about 60% of the labour force and household service burdens remain substantial, so time abundance cannot be inferred from employment or GDP.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.55 + -22.25 + -22.98 + -9.54 = -69.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +13.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +13.8. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -69.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+13.8 Original evidence category score+13.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 12.25 + -17.50 + 5.25 = 13.75

Base: 13.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +13.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 13.75 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.24 points

For Togo, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Togo: Human Time & Burden Return research finding

For Togo, no reliable current national average-hours measure was secured. Agriculture employs about 60% of the labour force and household service burdens remain substantial, so time abundance cannot be inferred from employment or GDP.

World Food Programme — Togo country profile
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-69.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +13.8

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-69.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 25%= -14.6 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 25% = -14.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Togo, no sufficiently current national housing-adequacy, overcrowding, tenure and affordability dataset was secured. Rapid urban growth and northern displacement make a national abundance claim unsafe without stronger evidence.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-63.6× 35%= -22.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.6 × 35% = -22.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, no sufficiently current national housing-adequacy, overcrowding, tenure and affordability dataset was secured. Rapid urban growth and northern displacement make a national abundance claim unsafe without stronger evidence.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-91.9× 25%= -23.0 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Original evidence -70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -91.9 × 25% = -23.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, no sufficiently current national housing-adequacy, overcrowding, tenure and affordability dataset was secured. Rapid urban growth and northern displacement make a national abundance claim unsafe without stronger evidence.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-63.6× 15%= -9.5 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.6 × 15% = -9.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, no sufficiently current national housing-adequacy, overcrowding, tenure and affordability dataset was secured. Rapid urban growth and northern displacement make a national abundance claim unsafe without stronger evidence.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.55 + -22.25 + -22.98 + -9.54 = -69.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +13.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +13.8. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -69.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+13.8 Original evidence category score+13.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 12.25 + -17.50 + 5.25 = 13.75

Base: 13.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +13.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 13.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.10 points

For Togo, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-71.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +5.0

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-71.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-60.9× 25%= -15.2 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -60.9 × 25% = -15.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Togo, agriculture employs about 60% of the labour force, yet roughly 350,000 people face severe acute food insecurity. A November 2025 Cadre Harmonisé analysis projected about 332,000 people could reach crisis food insecurity in June-August 2026 absent improvement. Large agribusiness and school-meal programmes are active implementation, not proof of universal food access.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-66.3× 35%= -23.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

25.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -66.3 × 35% = -23.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, agriculture employs about 60% of the labour force, yet roughly 350,000 people face severe acute food insecurity. A November 2025 Cadre Harmonisé analysis projected about 332,000 people could reach crisis food insecurity in June-August 2026 absent improvement. Large agribusiness and school-meal programmes are active implementation, not proof of universal food access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-94.1× 25%= -23.5 points
Exact point calculation

-78.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -19.50 weighted points

Original evidence -78.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -78.0; Money-gated reading -94.1 × 25% = -23.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, agriculture employs about 60% of the labour force, yet roughly 350,000 people face severe acute food insecurity. A November 2025 Cadre Harmonisé analysis projected about 332,000 people could reach crisis food insecurity in June-August 2026 absent improvement. Large agribusiness and school-meal programmes are active implementation, not proof of universal food access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-64.9× 15%= -9.7 points
Exact point calculation

30.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points

Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -64.9 × 15% = -9.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, agriculture employs about 60% of the labour force, yet roughly 350,000 people face severe acute food insecurity. A November 2025 Cadre Harmonisé analysis projected about 332,000 people could reach crisis food insecurity in June-August 2026 absent improvement. Large agribusiness and school-meal programmes are active implementation, not proof of universal food access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -15.22 + -23.20 + -23.52 + -9.74 = -71.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +5.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +5.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -71.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+5.0 Original evidence category score+5.0 Contribution to national evidence score+0.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 11.25 + 8.75 + -19.50 + 4.50 = 5.00

Base: 5.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +5.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 5.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.45 points

For Togo, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Togo: Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance research finding

For Togo, agriculture employs about 60% of the labour force, yet roughly 350,000 people face severe acute food insecurity. A November 2025 Cadre Harmonisé analysis projected about 332,000 people could reach crisis food insecurity in June-August 2026 absent improvement. Large agribusiness and school-meal programmes are active implementation, not proof of universal food access.

World Food Programme — Togo country profile · World Food Programme — Food security projection for northern Togo
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-69.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +13.8

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-69.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 25%= -14.6 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 25% = -14.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Togo has groundwater and surface-water capacity, but household access and quality remain sharply unequal. UNICEF reports only 44% of poor households have basic improved water within 30 minutes versus 97% of rich households, and reports widespread faecal contamination of drinking water. Water policy targets universal affordable access; the target is not counted as achieved.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-63.6× 35%= -22.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.6 × 35% = -22.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Togo has groundwater and surface-water capacity, but household access and quality remain sharply unequal. UNICEF reports only 44% of poor households have basic improved water within 30 minutes versus 97% of rich households, and reports widespread faecal contamination of drinking water. Water policy targets universal affordable access; the target is not counted as achieved.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-91.9× 25%= -23.0 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Original evidence -70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -91.9 × 25% = -23.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Togo has groundwater and surface-water capacity, but household access and quality remain sharply unequal. UNICEF reports only 44% of poor households have basic improved water within 30 minutes versus 97% of rich households, and reports widespread faecal contamination of drinking water. Water policy targets universal affordable access; the target is not counted as achieved.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-63.6× 15%= -9.5 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.6 × 15% = -9.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Togo has groundwater and surface-water capacity, but household access and quality remain sharply unequal. UNICEF reports only 44% of poor households have basic improved water within 30 minutes versus 97% of rich households, and reports widespread faecal contamination of drinking water. Water policy targets universal affordable access; the target is not counted as achieved.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.55 + -22.25 + -22.98 + -9.54 = -69.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +13.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +13.8. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -69.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+13.8 Original evidence category score+13.8 Contribution to national evidence score+0.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 12.25 + -17.50 + 5.25 = 13.75

Base: 13.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +13.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 13.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.83 points

For Togo, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Togo: Water & Sanitation Abundance research finding

Togo has groundwater and surface-water capacity, but household access and quality remain sharply unequal. UNICEF reports only 44% of poor households have basic improved water within 30 minutes versus 97% of rich households, and reports widespread faecal contamination of drinking water. Water policy targets universal affordable access; the target is not counted as achieved.

UNICEF Togo — WASH in Togo · Government of Togo / UNICEF — National Water and Sanitation Policy
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-67.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +19.5

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-67.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-56.8× 25%= -14.2 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -56.8 × 25% = -14.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Togo, reliable electricity for all remains an explicit development objective in the 2025-2029 partnership framework. Major energy financing is active, but a current primary national household-access and outage series was not secured in this pass.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-61.7× 35%= -21.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

42.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.70 weighted points

Original evidence +42.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +42.0; Money-gated reading -61.7 × 35% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, reliable electricity for all remains an explicit development objective in the 2025-2029 partnership framework. Major energy financing is active, but a current primary national household-access and outage series was not secured in this pass.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-90.6× 25%= -22.6 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -90.6 × 25% = -22.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, reliable electricity for all remains an explicit development objective in the 2025-2029 partnership framework. Major energy financing is active, but a current primary national household-access and outage series was not secured in this pass.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-62.2× 15%= -9.3 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -62.2 × 15% = -9.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, reliable electricity for all remains an explicit development objective in the 2025-2029 partnership framework. Major energy financing is active, but a current primary national household-access and outage series was not secured in this pass.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.21 + -21.59 + -22.64 + -9.34 = -67.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +19.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +19.5. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -67.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+19.5 Original evidence category score+19.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 15.00 + 14.70 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 19.45

Base: 19.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 19.45 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.97 points

For Togo, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +18.0

What the evidence found

7% weight Health & Care Reach
-65.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +27.5

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-65.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-54.1× 25%= -13.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -54.1 × 25% = -13.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Togo, wHO reports geographical healthcare accessibility reached 90.6% by 2024 while universal health-insurance coverage reached 35%. Malaria prevention expanded, but financing, infrastructure, data quality and household financial protection remain constraints.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-59.5× 35%= -20.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.5 × 35% = -20.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, wHO reports geographical healthcare accessibility reached 90.6% by 2024 while universal health-insurance coverage reached 35%. Malaria prevention expanded, but financing, infrastructure, data quality and household financial protection remain constraints.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-89.2× 25%= -22.3 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -89.2 × 25% = -22.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, wHO reports geographical healthcare accessibility reached 90.6% by 2024 while universal health-insurance coverage reached 35%. Malaria prevention expanded, but financing, infrastructure, data quality and household financial protection remain constraints.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-59.5× 15%= -8.9 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.5 × 15% = -8.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, wHO reports geographical healthcare accessibility reached 90.6% by 2024 while universal health-insurance coverage reached 35%. Malaria prevention expanded, but financing, infrastructure, data quality and household financial protection remain constraints.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.54 + -20.84 + -22.30 + -8.93 = -65.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +27.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +27.5. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -65.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+27.5 Original evidence category score+27.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 7.50 = 27.50

Base: 27.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 27.50 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.93 points

For Togo, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Togo: Health & Care Reach research finding

For Togo, wHO reports geographical healthcare accessibility reached 90.6% by 2024 while universal health-insurance coverage reached 35%. Malaria prevention expanded, but financing, infrastructure, data quality and household financial protection remain constraints.

World Health Organization — WHO Results Report 2024-2025: Togo
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-67.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +19.5

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-67.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-56.8× 25%= -14.2 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -56.8 × 25% = -14.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Togo, primary-education access has improved and integrated child-service and school-feeding models are expanding. Rural WASH remains a school constraint: UNICEF reports only about one-third of primary schools have basic water service in its programme evidence.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-61.7× 35%= -21.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

42.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.70 weighted points

Original evidence +42.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +42.0; Money-gated reading -61.7 × 35% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, primary-education access has improved and integrated child-service and school-feeding models are expanding. Rural WASH remains a school constraint: UNICEF reports only about one-third of primary schools have basic water service in its programme evidence.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-90.6× 25%= -22.6 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -90.6 × 25% = -22.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, primary-education access has improved and integrated child-service and school-feeding models are expanding. Rural WASH remains a school constraint: UNICEF reports only about one-third of primary schools have basic water service in its programme evidence.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-62.2× 15%= -9.3 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -62.2 × 15% = -9.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, primary-education access has improved and integrated child-service and school-feeding models are expanding. Rural WASH remains a school constraint: UNICEF reports only about one-third of primary schools have basic water service in its programme evidence.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.21 + -21.59 + -22.64 + -9.34 = -67.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +19.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +19.5. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -67.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+19.5 Original evidence category score+19.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 15.00 + 14.70 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 19.45

Base: 19.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 19.45 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.17 points

For Togo, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +18.0

What the evidence found

4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-67.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +19.5

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-67.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-56.8× 25%= -14.2 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -56.8 × 25% = -14.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Togo's port and corridor position creates strong regional logistics capacity, but no current national all-season household road-access/reliability measure was secured. Infrastructure investment is active rather than evidence of universal mobility.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-61.7× 35%= -21.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

42.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.70 weighted points

Original evidence +42.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +42.0; Money-gated reading -61.7 × 35% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Togo's port and corridor position creates strong regional logistics capacity, but no current national all-season household road-access/reliability measure was secured. Infrastructure investment is active rather than evidence of universal mobility.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-90.6× 25%= -22.6 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -90.6 × 25% = -22.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Togo's port and corridor position creates strong regional logistics capacity, but no current national all-season household road-access/reliability measure was secured. Infrastructure investment is active rather than evidence of universal mobility.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-62.2× 15%= -9.3 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -62.2 × 15% = -9.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Togo's port and corridor position creates strong regional logistics capacity, but no current national all-season household road-access/reliability measure was secured. Infrastructure investment is active rather than evidence of universal mobility.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.21 + -21.59 + -22.64 + -9.34 = -67.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +19.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +19.5. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -67.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+19.5 Original evidence category score+19.5 Contribution to national evidence score+0.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 15.00 + 14.70 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 19.45

Base: 19.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 19.45 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.78 points

For Togo, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +18.0

What the evidence found

8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-67.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +19.5

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-67.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-56.8× 25%= -14.2 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -56.8 × 25% = -14.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Togo, dagbéKéva coordinates health, nutrition, preschool, protection, civil registration and WASH around children and families in Vo prefecture, while northern humanitarian programmes support displaced and host families. These are subnational/targeted systems, not universal family support.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-61.7× 35%= -21.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

42.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.70 weighted points

Original evidence +42.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +42.0; Money-gated reading -61.7 × 35% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, dagbéKéva coordinates health, nutrition, preschool, protection, civil registration and WASH around children and families in Vo prefecture, while northern humanitarian programmes support displaced and host families. These are subnational/targeted systems, not universal family support.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-90.6× 25%= -22.6 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -90.6 × 25% = -22.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, dagbéKéva coordinates health, nutrition, preschool, protection, civil registration and WASH around children and families in Vo prefecture, while northern humanitarian programmes support displaced and host families. These are subnational/targeted systems, not universal family support.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-62.2× 15%= -9.3 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -62.2 × 15% = -9.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, dagbéKéva coordinates health, nutrition, preschool, protection, civil registration and WASH around children and families in Vo prefecture, while northern humanitarian programmes support displaced and host families. These are subnational/targeted systems, not universal family support.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.21 + -21.59 + -22.64 + -9.34 = -67.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +19.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +19.5. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -67.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+19.5 Original evidence category score+19.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 15.00 + 14.70 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 19.45

Base: 19.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 19.45 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.56 points

For Togo, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +19.5

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: +19.5 − 0 = +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Togo: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded by the 2026-10-10 legal-status review. Country is included in the 2026 legal-status survey under a status other than generally available domestic civil marriage. This describes legal status, not a demonstrated effect on birth rates.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2026-10-10 (access date; verify publication date in linked source) · Reviewed: 2026-10-10

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +18.0

What the evidence found

Togo: Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability research finding

For Togo, dagbéKéva coordinates health, nutrition, preschool, protection, civil registration and WASH around children and families in Vo prefecture, while northern humanitarian programmes support displaced and host families. These are subnational/targeted systems, not universal family support.

UNICEF Togo — DagbéKéva integrated territorial child-services model · UNICEF Togo — Child-friendly spaces for refugees in northern Togo
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-65.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +27.5

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-65.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-54.1× 25%= -13.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -54.1 × 25% = -13.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Togo, agricultural programmes are expanding irrigation, mechanization and sustainable land management, but no current nationwide household land-tenure/security dataset was secured. Production-land investment cannot substitute for household spatial freedom.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-59.5× 35%= -20.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.5 × 35% = -20.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, agricultural programmes are expanding irrigation, mechanization and sustainable land management, but no current nationwide household land-tenure/security dataset was secured. Production-land investment cannot substitute for household spatial freedom.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-89.2× 25%= -22.3 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -89.2 × 25% = -22.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, agricultural programmes are expanding irrigation, mechanization and sustainable land management, but no current nationwide household land-tenure/security dataset was secured. Production-land investment cannot substitute for household spatial freedom.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-59.5× 15%= -8.9 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.5 × 15% = -8.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, agricultural programmes are expanding irrigation, mechanization and sustainable land management, but no current nationwide household land-tenure/security dataset was secured. Production-land investment cannot substitute for household spatial freedom.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.54 + -20.84 + -22.30 + -8.93 = -65.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +27.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +27.5. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -65.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+27.5 Original evidence category score+27.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 7.50 = 27.50

Base: 27.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 27.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.38 points

For Togo, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Togo: Land Access & Spatial Freedom research finding

For Togo, agricultural programmes are expanding irrigation, mechanization and sustainable land management, but no current nationwide household land-tenure/security dataset was secured. Production-land investment cannot substitute for household spatial freedom.

World Bank — Agribusiness and animal nutrition program
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-67.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +19.5

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-67.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-56.8× 25%= -14.2 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -56.8 × 25% = -14.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Togo has Atlantic coastline, forests, wetlands and varied landscapes. Northern insecurity linked to Sahel spillover limits safe everyday access in affected areas, so physical beauty is kept separate from lived peace and leisure.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-61.7× 35%= -21.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

42.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.70 weighted points

Original evidence +42.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +42.0; Money-gated reading -61.7 × 35% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Togo has Atlantic coastline, forests, wetlands and varied landscapes. Northern insecurity linked to Sahel spillover limits safe everyday access in affected areas, so physical beauty is kept separate from lived peace and leisure.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-90.6× 25%= -22.6 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -90.6 × 25% = -22.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Togo has Atlantic coastline, forests, wetlands and varied landscapes. Northern insecurity linked to Sahel spillover limits safe everyday access in affected areas, so physical beauty is kept separate from lived peace and leisure.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-62.2× 15%= -9.3 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -62.2 × 15% = -9.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Togo has Atlantic coastline, forests, wetlands and varied landscapes. Northern insecurity linked to Sahel spillover limits safe everyday access in affected areas, so physical beauty is kept separate from lived peace and leisure.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.21 + -21.59 + -22.64 + -9.34 = -67.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +19.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +19.5. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -67.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+19.5 Original evidence category score+19.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 15.00 + 14.70 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 19.45

Base: 19.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 19.45 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.17 points

For Togo, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +18.0

What the evidence found

6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-65.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +27.5

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-65.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-54.1× 25%= -13.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -54.1 × 25% = -13.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Togo, climate law, biodiversity finance and sustainable land-management programmes are real policy/implementation steps. Drought, recurrent floods, coastal erosion, heat and land degradation remain material threats to children, food, water and settlements.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-59.5× 35%= -20.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.5 × 35% = -20.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, climate law, biodiversity finance and sustainable land-management programmes are real policy/implementation steps. Drought, recurrent floods, coastal erosion, heat and land degradation remain material threats to children, food, water and settlements.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-89.2× 25%= -22.3 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -89.2 × 25% = -22.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, climate law, biodiversity finance and sustainable land-management programmes are real policy/implementation steps. Drought, recurrent floods, coastal erosion, heat and land degradation remain material threats to children, food, water and settlements.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-59.5× 15%= -8.9 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.5 × 15% = -8.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, climate law, biodiversity finance and sustainable land-management programmes are real policy/implementation steps. Drought, recurrent floods, coastal erosion, heat and land degradation remain material threats to children, food, water and settlements.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.54 + -20.84 + -22.30 + -8.93 = -65.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +27.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +27.5. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -65.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+27.5 Original evidence category score+27.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 7.50 = 27.50

Base: 27.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 27.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.65 points

For Togo, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-69.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +13.8

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-69.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 25%= -14.6 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 25% = -14.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Togo, community cohesion and resilience work is active, especially in Savanes, but spillover insecurity and displacement remain material. A sufficiently current comprehensive official national crime dataset was not secured.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-63.6× 35%= -22.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.6 × 35% = -22.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, community cohesion and resilience work is active, especially in Savanes, but spillover insecurity and displacement remain material. A sufficiently current comprehensive official national crime dataset was not secured.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-91.9× 25%= -23.0 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Original evidence -70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -91.9 × 25% = -23.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, community cohesion and resilience work is active, especially in Savanes, but spillover insecurity and displacement remain material. A sufficiently current comprehensive official national crime dataset was not secured.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-63.6× 15%= -9.5 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.6 × 15% = -9.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, community cohesion and resilience work is active, especially in Savanes, but spillover insecurity and displacement remain material. A sufficiently current comprehensive official national crime dataset was not secured.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.55 + -22.25 + -22.98 + -9.54 = -69.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +13.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +13.8. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -69.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+13.8 Original evidence category score+13.8 Contribution to national evidence score+0.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 12.25 + -17.50 + 5.25 = 13.75

Base: 13.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +13.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 13.75 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.69 points

For Togo, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-71.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +5.0

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-71.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-60.9× 25%= -15.2 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -60.9 × 25% = -15.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Togo, no reliable current national waste-generation, collection and material-recovery dataset was secured. Sanitation programmes and environmental policy exist, but evidence of a nationwide circular material-return system was not found.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-66.3× 35%= -23.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

25.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -66.3 × 35% = -23.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, no reliable current national waste-generation, collection and material-recovery dataset was secured. Sanitation programmes and environmental policy exist, but evidence of a nationwide circular material-return system was not found.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-94.1× 25%= -23.5 points
Exact point calculation

-78.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -19.50 weighted points

Original evidence -78.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -78.0; Money-gated reading -94.1 × 25% = -23.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, no reliable current national waste-generation, collection and material-recovery dataset was secured. Sanitation programmes and environmental policy exist, but evidence of a nationwide circular material-return system was not found.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-64.9× 15%= -9.7 points
Exact point calculation

30.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points

Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -64.9 × 15% = -9.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, no reliable current national waste-generation, collection and material-recovery dataset was secured. Sanitation programmes and environmental policy exist, but evidence of a nationwide circular material-return system was not found.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -15.22 + -23.20 + -23.52 + -9.74 = -71.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +5.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +5.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -71.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+5.0 Original evidence category score+5.0 Contribution to national evidence score+0.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 11.25 + 8.75 + -19.50 + 4.50 = 5.00

Base: 5.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +5.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 5.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.20 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

For Togo, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

6% weight International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
-64.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +30.8

International score breakdown

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

-64.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Entry Accessibility 25%
See all nine International Welcome Entry Accessibility scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.3× 25%= -14.6 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +54.8; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 25% = -14.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Togo's Lomé port and regional corridor role support international movement of goods, but a complete current primary passport/visa-access dataset for people was not secured. Logistics capacity is not substituted for personal travel access.

🤔
Migrant Practical Life 30%
See all nine International Welcome Migrant Practical Life scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-69.0× 30%= -20.7 points
Exact point calculation

15.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points

Original evidence +15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +14.8; Money-gated reading -69.0 × 30% = -20.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Togo's Lomé port and regional corridor role support international movement of goods, but a complete current primary passport/visa-access dataset for people was not secured. Logistics capacity is not substituted for personal travel access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome 25%
See all nine International Welcome Refugee / Neighbour Welcome scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-63.7× 25%= -15.9 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +34.8; Money-gated reading -63.7 × 25% = -15.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Togo's Lomé port and regional corridor role support international movement of goods, but a complete current primary passport/visa-access dataset for people was not secured. Logistics capacity is not substituted for personal travel access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Flexibility / Continuity 20%
See all nine International Welcome Flexibility / Continuity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-67.7× 20%= -13.6 points
Exact point calculation

20.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 4.00 weighted points

Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +19.8; Money-gated reading -67.7 × 20% = -13.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Togo's Lomé port and regional corridor role support international movement of goods, but a complete current primary passport/visa-access dataset for people was not secured. Logistics capacity is not substituted for personal travel access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.56 + -20.71 + -15.91 + -13.55 = -64.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +31.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.3. Effective evidence: +30.8. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+31.0 Published research adjustment-0.3 Original evidence category score+30.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 4.50 + 8.75 + 4.00 = 31.00

Base: 30.75 · reviewed adjustment: -0.25 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +30.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 30.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.85 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Source-supported Trott Bailey Family Civilization evaluative assignment, not an observed population no-payment rate. Togo receives Burkinabé refugees under an out-of-camp policy and supports group refugee recognition; visa application fees remain for other nationalities. Source: https://www.unhcr.org/where-we-work/countries/togo. Four distinct beleshkies weighted 25/35/25/15; no new Direct Money Gate points awarded.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Togo, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

Togo: International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome research finding

Togo's Lomé port and regional corridor role support international movement of goods, but a complete current primary passport/visa-access dataset for people was not secured. Logistics capacity is not substituted for personal travel access.

World Bank — Togo country overview
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-67.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +19.3

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-67.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Positive Contribution 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-58.3× 25%= -14.6 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 12.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +54.5; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 25% = -14.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Togo, climate governance strengthened with a 2025 climate law and biodiversity-finance work, but a complete current territorial plus consumption/import footprint ledger was not secured. Policy ambition is kept separate from achieved footprint.

🤔
Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-65.1× 25%= -16.3 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +29.5; Money-gated reading -65.1 × 25% = -16.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, climate governance strengthened with a 2025 climate law and biodiversity-finance work, but a complete current territorial plus consumption/import footprint ledger was not secured. Policy ambition is kept separate from achieved footprint.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-77.2× 35%= -27.0 points
Exact point calculation

-20.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -7.00 weighted points

Original evidence -20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -15.5; Money-gated reading -77.2 × 35% = -27.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, climate governance strengthened with a 2025 climate law and biodiversity-finance work, but a complete current territorial plus consumption/import footprint ledger was not secured. Policy ambition is kept separate from achieved footprint.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Accountability / Repair 15%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-66.4× 15%= -10.0 points
Exact point calculation

20.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.00 weighted points

Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +24.5; Money-gated reading -66.4 × 15% = -10.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Togo, climate governance strengthened with a 2025 climate law and biodiversity-finance work, but a complete current territorial plus consumption/import footprint ledger was not secured. Policy ambition is kept separate from achieved footprint.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.58 + -16.27 + -27.02 + -9.96 = -67.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +14.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): +4.5. Effective evidence: +19.3. Money Gate ceiling: -46.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -67.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+14.8 Published research adjustment+4.5 Original evidence category score+19.3 Contribution to national evidence score+1.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 12.50 + 6.25 + -7.00 + 3.00 = 14.75

Base: 19.25 · reviewed adjustment: 4.50 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 19.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.16 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Exported waste / garbageAudit pending
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Source-supported Trott Bailey Family Civilization evaluative assignment, not an observed population no-payment rate. Togo has contributed personnel to multiple UN peace operations; humanitarian benefits and external harm must be assessed separately. Source: https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/togo. Four distinct beleshkies weighted 25/35/25/15; no new Direct Money Gate points awarded.

For Togo, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Togo’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.