Skip to Abundance content

World Wealthiest Country · Abundance history

China 🇨🇳 · Country History

Movement in the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, measured through access to life rather than GDP or money. Every archived point adjustment and source remains available; unchanged observations are condensed by date, not deleted.

World Wealthiest Country · Recorded rank history

83 meaningful rank/score point(s)
Recorded period 1 of 83: rank 93. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 83: rank 95. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 83: rank 96. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 83: rank 96. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 9 Oct 2026 · 07:51 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 83: rank 93. 9 Oct 2026 · 12:04 GMT-0500 – 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 83: rank 129. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 83: rank 130. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 83: rank 129. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 83: rank 130. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 83: rank 131. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 83: rank 130. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 83: rank 129. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 83: rank 128. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 83: rank 127. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 83: rank 126. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 83: rank 131. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 83: rank 130. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 83: rank 129. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 83: rank 130. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 83: rank 129. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 83: rank 130. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 83: rank 129. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 83: rank 128. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 83: rank 127. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 83: rank 128. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 83: rank 127. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 83: rank 126. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 83: rank 125. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 83: rank 124. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 83: rank 123. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 83: rank 122. 17 Oct 2026 · 03:54 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 83: rank 172. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 83: rank 240. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 83: rank 239. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 83: rank 238. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 83: rank 237. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 83: rank 236. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 83: rank 235. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 83: rank 234. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 83: rank 233. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 83: rank 232. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 83: rank 231. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 83: rank 230. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 83: rank 229. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 45 of 83: rank 228. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 46 of 83: rank 227. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 47 of 83: rank 226. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 48 of 83: rank 225. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 49 of 83: rank 224. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 50 of 83: rank 223. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 51 of 83: rank 222. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 52 of 83: rank 221. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 53 of 83: rank 220. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 54 of 83: rank 219. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 55 of 83: rank 218. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 56 of 83: rank 217. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 57 of 83: rank 216. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 58 of 83: rank 215. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 59 of 83: rank 214. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 60 of 83: rank 213. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 61 of 83: rank 212. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 62 of 83: rank 211. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 63 of 83: rank 210. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 64 of 83: rank 209. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 65 of 83: rank 208. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 66 of 83: rank 207. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 67 of 83: rank 206. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 68 of 83: rank 205. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 69 of 83: rank 204. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 70 of 83: rank 203. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 71 of 83: rank 202. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 72 of 83: rank 201. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 73 of 83: rank 200. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 74 of 83: rank 199. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 75 of 83: rank 198. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 76 of 83: rank 196. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 77 of 83: rank 195. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 78 of 83: rank 193. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 16:49 GMT-0500Recorded period 79 of 83: rank 143. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 80 of 83: rank 155. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 81 of 83: rank 158. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 82 of 83: rank 166. 21 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500Recorded period 83 of 83: rank 167. 21 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500NOW #167Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

National score over the same dates

The rank can hold while points move. This chart shows only actually recorded score readings; its vertical scale follows the visible minimum and maximum.

-59.17 · 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 9 Oct 2026 · 07:51 GMT-0500-59.17 · 9 Oct 2026 · 12:04 GMT-0500 – 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500-62.31 · 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500-62.31 · 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500-62.31 · 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500-62.31 · 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500-62.31 · 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500-62.31 · 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500-62.31 · 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500-62.31 · 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500-62.31 · 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500-62.31 · 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500-63.75 · 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500-63.75 · 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500-63.75 · 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500-63.75 · 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500-63.75 · 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500-63.75 · 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500-63.75 · 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500-63.75 · 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500-63.75 · 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500-63.75 · 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500-63.75 · 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500-63.75 · 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500-63.75 · 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500-63.75 · 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500-63.75 · 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500-63.75 · 17 Oct 2026 · 03:54 GMT-0500-68.85 · 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500-68.85 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-68.85 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-68.85 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-68.85 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-68.85 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-68.85 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-68.85 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-68.85 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-68.85 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-68.85 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-68.85 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-68.85 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-68.85 · 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500-68.85 · 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500-68.85 · 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500-68.85 · 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500-68.85 · 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500-68.85 · 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500-68.85 · 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500-68.85 · 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500-68.85 · 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500-68.85 · 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500-68.85 · 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 16:49 GMT-0500-68.02 · 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500-68.02 · 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500-68.02 · 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500-68.02 · 21 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500-68.02 · 21 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500-59.17-68.85Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dots mark initial readings and rank or score changes; unchanged readings extend a dated interval. Select a dot for the score and related archived events.

Selected rank observation

Ranking changed

Recorded rank movement.

Rank#166 → #167National score-68.02 → -68.02

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Peer identities were not stored for this older rank event; missing before/after rankings cannot be reconstructed.

Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved down from #166 to #167 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#166 → #167National score-68.02 → -68.02

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

No peer crossing can be confirmed from the two archived ranking snapshots.

Every recorded change

Each archived event is preserved. Category details and sources begin from the first detailed country snapshot; older records remain visible without invented comparisons.

Category and evidence update

Mobility & Reachability changed from 37.5 to 48.5. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Mobility & Reachability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score37.5048.50
Base category score37.5048.50
Reach (35%)50.0075.00
Friction (25%)-50.00-35.00
Return / Time (15%)50.0040.00

Category point adjustment: +11.00 category points

Updated reasoning

China’s mobility capacity remains exceptional, with 17.12 billion passenger trips and 4.6 billion rail passenger trips in 2025. That infrastructure receives strong credit. Safety, time burden and genuine door-to-door family reach remain separate questions, so very large transport volume is not treated as complete mobility abundance.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (13)
Sources archived after the change (5)
Category and evidence update

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience changed from 31.25 to 36.25. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score31.2536.25
Base category score31.2536.25
Capacity (25%)75.0080.00
Reach / Ecological Function (35%)50.0055.00
Friction / Loss (25%)-50.00-45.00
Return / Regeneration (15%)50.0055.00

Category point adjustment: +5.00 category points

Updated reasoning

China shows major ecological-repair capacity: 3.56 million hectares of afforestation, 4.93 million hectares of grassland restoration, improving surface-water quality and a 2025 national PM2.5 average of 28 μg/m³. The score preserves those gains while still counting air-quality failures in a significant minority of cities and the ecological pressure associated with continued coal dependence.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (15)
Sources archived after the change (7)
Category and evidence update

Land Access & Spatial Freedom changed from -8.75 to -17. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score-8.75-17.00
Base category score-8.75-17.00
Capacity (25%)75.0090.00
Reach (35%)-25.00-45.00
Friction / Concentration (25%)-75.00-80.00
Return / Productive Ground (15%)0.00-25.00

Category point adjustment: -8.25 category points

Updated reasoning

China has immense physical territory and state capacity to allocate land, but the national indicators available here mainly measure state construction supply, urbanization and real-estate allocation rather than ordinary household access to productive living ground. Under the TBF spatial-freedom standard, state-scale land capacity therefore receives strong physical credit but little credit for family-authored settlement freedom.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (13)
Sources archived after the change (5)
Category and evidence update

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction changed from -15 to 26. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score-15.0026.00
Base category score-15.0026.00
Capacity (25%)50.0065.00
Reach (35%)-25.0045.00
Friction (25%)-75.00-45.00
Return / Reliability (15%)0.0035.00

Category point adjustment: +41.00 category points

Updated reasoning

Physical-safety indicators improved in 2025: serious violent prosecutions and work-accident deaths declined. Institutional-friction evidence is more mixed: the independent 2025 World Justice Project index scored China at 0.48 and ranked it 92 of 143. The score keeps those evidence types separate instead of treating either official safety data or an external institutional index as the whole category.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (16)
Sources archived after the change (8)
Category and evidence update

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome changed from -7.5 to 14.5. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score-7.5014.50
Base category score-7.5014.50
Research coverage (%)100.0080.00
Entry Accessibility (25%)50.0060.00
Migrant Practical Life (30%)-25.0020.00
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome (25%)-50.00-30.00
Flexibility / Continuity (20%)0.005.00

Category point adjustment: +22.00 category points

Updated reasoning

2026-10-10 TBF four-rail full review. International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome. Four source-linked rail findings are recorded separately (capacity/reach/protection/continuity or contribution/mutuality/harm/repair). Score +14.50 is an authored evaluation of verified findings, not an official government, OECD or UN rating. Gaps in causal attribution and lived outcomes are retained; no missing data were invented.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (20)
Sources archived after the change (12)
Category and evidence update

Human Time & Burden Return changed from 1.25 to -19.5. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Human Time & Burden Return

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score1.25-19.50
Base category score1.25-19.50
Capacity (25%)75.0070.00
Reach (35%)25.00-20.00
Friction (25%)-75.00-90.00

Category point adjustment: -20.75 category points

Updated reasoning

China retains enormous productive capacity, but the life-reach reading is heavily reduced by time burden. NBS reported a 48.6-hour average enterprise workweek in 2025, while China’s own court and labour authorities have treated 996-style 9-to-9, six-day schedules as exceeding legal overtime limits. Under the TBF standard, production that consumes family time does not count as returned abundance.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (14)
Sources archived after the change (6)
Category and evidence update

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach changed from 8.75 to -14. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score8.75-14.00
Base category score8.75-14.00
Capacity (25%)75.0085.00
Reach (35%)25.00-35.00
Friction (25%)-75.00-80.00
Return / Durability (15%)0.00-20.00

Category point adjustment: -22.75 category points

Updated reasoning

China has built housing at extraordinary physical scale, yet physical inventory is not the same as ordinary family reach. In 2025 residence absorbed 21.7% of household consumption, 402.36 million square metres of commercial residential floor space remained for sale, and peer-reviewed research links higher housing costs to delayed marriage. Capacity therefore receives strong credit while access, burden return and family use are scored much lower.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (15)
Sources archived after the change (7)
Category and evidence update

Health & Care Reach changed from 31.25 to 42.75. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Health & Care Reach

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score31.2542.75
Base category score31.2542.75
Capacity (25%)75.0090.00
Reach (35%)50.0065.00
Friction (25%)-50.00-40.00

Category point adjustment: +11.50 category points

Updated reasoning

Health reach is broad: more than 90% of residents can reach nearby care within 15 minutes, basic medical insurance covers about 1.33 billion people, and life expectancy reached 79.25 years. The deeper pass separates that reach from friction: average hospital-stay and outpatient costs remain meaningful household burdens, so medical capacity is not treated as effortless care abundance.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (16)
Sources archived after the change (8)
Category and evidence update

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance changed from 27.5 to 37.75. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score27.5037.75
Base category score27.5037.75
Capacity (25%)75.0095.00
Reach (35%)50.0055.00
Friction / Waste (25%)-50.00-30.00
Return / Multiplication (15%)25.0015.00

Category point adjustment: +10.25 category points

Updated reasoning

China’s food-production capacity remains very strong: grain output reached 714.88 million tonnes and undernourishment is low. The deeper pass separates that achievement from household reach and free-food abundance: food, tobacco and liquor still represented 29.3% of household consumption expenditure in 2025, so national production does not receive the same score as food that reaches families with little money friction.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (13)
Sources archived after the change (5)
Category and evidence update

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability changed from -13.75 to -19. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score-13.75-19.00
Base category score-13.75-19.00
Capacity (25%)50.0055.00
Reach (35%)0.005.00
Friction (25%)-75.00-90.00
Return / Continuity (15%)-50.00-80.00

Category point adjustment: -5.25 category points

Updated reasoning

China retains strong cultural and institutional signals around marriage, and marriage registrations rose to 6.76 million in 2025 after registration barriers were eased. The family outcome is nevertheless severe: 7.92 million births, a 5.63‰ birth rate, -2.41‰ natural population growth, household size around 2.52 and very low fertility. The historical one-child policy is retained as context, not treated as the sole cause; current housing and time pressures also matter.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (18)
Sources archived after the change (10)
Category and evidence update

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct changed from 8.75 to -6. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score8.75-6.00
Base category score8.75-6.00
Research coverage (%)100.0078.00
Positive Contribution (25%)50.0045.00
Mutuality / Local Benefit (25%)25.0020.00
Documented Harm / Extraction (35%)-50.00-55.00
Accountability / Repair (15%)0.00-20.00

Category point adjustment: -14.75 category points

Updated reasoning

2026-10-10 TBF four-rail full review. External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct. Four source-linked rail findings are recorded separately (capacity/reach/protection/continuity or contribution/mutuality/harm/repair). Score -6.00 is an authored evaluation of verified findings, not an official government, OECD or UN rating. Gaps in causal attribution and lived outcomes are retained; no missing data were invented.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. External Footprint 3.1: contribution 25%, mutuality 25%, other harm/repair 20%, exporter 15%, importer 15%. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (20)
Sources archived after the change (12)
Category and evidence update

Energy & Household Capability changed from 37.5 to 45.25. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Energy & Household Capability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score37.5045.25
Base category score37.5045.25
Reach (35%)50.0080.00
Friction (25%)-50.00-55.00
Return / Burden Removed (15%)50.0040.00

Category point adjustment: +7.75 category points

Updated reasoning

China has exceptional energy-system capability and renewable build-out: renewable installed capacity reached about 2.337 billion kW in 2025 and renewable generation supplied roughly 38.5% of electricity use. Coal nevertheless remained 51.4% of primary energy consumption. The score preserves the extraordinary physical capacity while reducing regeneration and burden-return credit for continued fossil dependence.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (15)
Sources archived after the change (7)
Category and evidence update

Education & Human Capability changed from 31.25 to 39.75. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Education & Human Capability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score31.2539.75
Base category score31.2539.75
Capacity (25%)75.0090.00
Reach (35%)50.0070.00
Return / Capability (15%)50.0035.00

Category point adjustment: +8.50 category points

Updated reasoning

China has broad formal education reach, including 96.1% nine-year compulsory retention and 61.3% gross higher-education enrollment. The deeper TBF capability reading gives less automatic credit to enrollment volume because attendance is not itself proof of practical mastery, youth time abundance or family-integrated capability. Physical and institutional reach remain strong; human-return rails are more cautious.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (14)
Sources archived after the change (6)
Category and evidence update

Durability, Repair & Material Return changed from 22.5 to 43.25. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Durability, Repair & Material Return

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score22.5043.25
Base category score22.5043.25
Capacity (25%)75.0085.00
Reach (35%)25.0060.00
Friction / Waste (25%)-50.00-35.00
Return / Circularity (15%)50.0065.00

Category point adjustment: +20.75 category points

Updated reasoning

China has very large circular-material capacity: more than 400 million tonnes of major renewable resources are reused annually, bulk-solid-waste utilization is around 60%, and a large national collection/sorting network supports recovery. The deeper pass preserves that strength but does not infer household repairability, product longevity or right-to-repair from industrial recycling volume alone.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (15)
Sources archived after the change (7)
Evidence / data update

Published evidence, observations or country data changed. The headline score did not materially change in this update.

Full country evidence and Money Gate rescan

Conditional reversal of unjustified reconstructed recovery values only where injected score and notes still match. Original country scores restored; derived source assertions returned to reviewed/unverified.

National points: -68.85 → —; Rank: #172 → #240

Durability, Repair & Material Return

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score22.5043.25
Base category score22.5043.25
Capacity (25%)75.0085.00
Reach (35%)25.0060.00
Friction / Waste (25%)-50.00-35.00
Return / Circularity (15%)50.0065.00

Category point adjustment: +20.75 category points

Updated reasoning

China has very large circular-material capacity: more than 400 million tonnes of major renewable resources are reused annually, bulk-solid-waste utilization is around 60%, and a large national collection/sorting network supports recovery. The deeper pass preserves that strength but does not infer household repairability, product longevity or right-to-repair from industrial recycling volume alone.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (15)
Sources archived after the change (7)

Education & Human Capability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score31.2539.75
Base category score31.2539.75
Capacity (25%)75.0090.00
Reach (35%)50.0070.00
Return / Capability (15%)50.0035.00

Category point adjustment: +8.50 category points

Updated reasoning

China has broad formal education reach, including 96.1% nine-year compulsory retention and 61.3% gross higher-education enrollment. The deeper TBF capability reading gives less automatic credit to enrollment volume because attendance is not itself proof of practical mastery, youth time abundance or family-integrated capability. Physical and institutional reach remain strong; human-return rails are more cautious.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (14)
Sources archived after the change (6)

Energy & Household Capability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score37.5045.25
Base category score37.5045.25
Reach (35%)50.0080.00
Friction (25%)-50.00-55.00
Return / Burden Removed (15%)50.0040.00

Category point adjustment: +7.75 category points

Updated reasoning

China has exceptional energy-system capability and renewable build-out: renewable installed capacity reached about 2.337 billion kW in 2025 and renewable generation supplied roughly 38.5% of electricity use. Coal nevertheless remained 51.4% of primary energy consumption. The score preserves the extraordinary physical capacity while reducing regeneration and burden-return credit for continued fossil dependence.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (15)
Sources archived after the change (7)

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score8.75-6.00
Base category score8.75-6.00
Research coverage (%)100.0078.00
Positive Contribution (25%)50.0045.00
Mutuality / Local Benefit (25%)25.0020.00
Documented Harm / Extraction (35%)-50.00-55.00
Accountability / Repair (15%)0.00-20.00

Category point adjustment: -14.75 category points

Updated reasoning

2026-10-10 TBF four-rail full review. External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct. Four source-linked rail findings are recorded separately (capacity/reach/protection/continuity or contribution/mutuality/harm/repair). Score -6.00 is an authored evaluation of verified findings, not an official government, OECD or UN rating. Gaps in causal attribution and lived outcomes are retained; no missing data were invented.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. External Footprint 3.1: contribution 25%, mutuality 25%, other harm/repair 20%, exporter 15%, importer 15%. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (20)
Sources archived after the change (12)

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score-13.75-19.00
Base category score-13.75-19.00
Capacity (25%)50.0055.00
Reach (35%)0.005.00
Friction (25%)-75.00-90.00
Return / Continuity (15%)-50.00-80.00

Category point adjustment: -5.25 category points

Updated reasoning

China retains strong cultural and institutional signals around marriage, and marriage registrations rose to 6.76 million in 2025 after registration barriers were eased. The family outcome is nevertheless severe: 7.92 million births, a 5.63‰ birth rate, -2.41‰ natural population growth, household size around 2.52 and very low fertility. The historical one-child policy is retained as context, not treated as the sole cause; current housing and time pressures also matter.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (18)
Sources archived after the change (10)

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score27.5037.75
Base category score27.5037.75
Capacity (25%)75.0095.00
Reach (35%)50.0055.00
Friction / Waste (25%)-50.00-30.00
Return / Multiplication (15%)25.0015.00

Category point adjustment: +10.25 category points

Updated reasoning

China’s food-production capacity remains very strong: grain output reached 714.88 million tonnes and undernourishment is low. The deeper pass separates that achievement from household reach and free-food abundance: food, tobacco and liquor still represented 29.3% of household consumption expenditure in 2025, so national production does not receive the same score as food that reaches families with little money friction.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (13)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Health & Care Reach

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score31.2542.75
Base category score31.2542.75
Capacity (25%)75.0090.00
Reach (35%)50.0065.00
Friction (25%)-50.00-40.00

Category point adjustment: +11.50 category points

Updated reasoning

Health reach is broad: more than 90% of residents can reach nearby care within 15 minutes, basic medical insurance covers about 1.33 billion people, and life expectancy reached 79.25 years. The deeper pass separates that reach from friction: average hospital-stay and outpatient costs remain meaningful household burdens, so medical capacity is not treated as effortless care abundance.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (16)
Sources archived after the change (8)

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score8.75-14.00
Base category score8.75-14.00
Capacity (25%)75.0085.00
Reach (35%)25.00-35.00
Friction (25%)-75.00-80.00
Return / Durability (15%)0.00-20.00

Category point adjustment: -22.75 category points

Updated reasoning

China has built housing at extraordinary physical scale, yet physical inventory is not the same as ordinary family reach. In 2025 residence absorbed 21.7% of household consumption, 402.36 million square metres of commercial residential floor space remained for sale, and peer-reviewed research links higher housing costs to delayed marriage. Capacity therefore receives strong credit while access, burden return and family use are scored much lower.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (15)
Sources archived after the change (7)

Human Time & Burden Return

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score1.25-19.50
Base category score1.25-19.50
Capacity (25%)75.0070.00
Reach (35%)25.00-20.00
Friction (25%)-75.00-90.00

Category point adjustment: -20.75 category points

Updated reasoning

China retains enormous productive capacity, but the life-reach reading is heavily reduced by time burden. NBS reported a 48.6-hour average enterprise workweek in 2025, while China’s own court and labour authorities have treated 996-style 9-to-9, six-day schedules as exceeding legal overtime limits. Under the TBF standard, production that consumes family time does not count as returned abundance.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (14)
Sources archived after the change (6)

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score-7.5014.50
Base category score-7.5014.50
Research coverage (%)100.0080.00
Entry Accessibility (25%)50.0060.00
Migrant Practical Life (30%)-25.0020.00
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome (25%)-50.00-30.00
Flexibility / Continuity (20%)0.005.00

Category point adjustment: +22.00 category points

Updated reasoning

2026-10-10 TBF four-rail full review. International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome. Four source-linked rail findings are recorded separately (capacity/reach/protection/continuity or contribution/mutuality/harm/repair). Score +14.50 is an authored evaluation of verified findings, not an official government, OECD or UN rating. Gaps in causal attribution and lived outcomes are retained; no missing data were invented.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (20)
Sources archived after the change (12)

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score-15.0026.00
Base category score-15.0026.00
Capacity (25%)50.0065.00
Reach (35%)-25.0045.00
Friction (25%)-75.00-45.00
Return / Reliability (15%)0.0035.00

Category point adjustment: +41.00 category points

Updated reasoning

Physical-safety indicators improved in 2025: serious violent prosecutions and work-accident deaths declined. Institutional-friction evidence is more mixed: the independent 2025 World Justice Project index scored China at 0.48 and ranked it 92 of 143. The score keeps those evidence types separate instead of treating either official safety data or an external institutional index as the whole category.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (16)
Sources archived after the change (8)

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score-8.75-17.00
Base category score-8.75-17.00
Capacity (25%)75.0090.00
Reach (35%)-25.00-45.00
Friction / Concentration (25%)-75.00-80.00
Return / Productive Ground (15%)0.00-25.00

Category point adjustment: -8.25 category points

Updated reasoning

China has immense physical territory and state capacity to allocate land, but the national indicators available here mainly measure state construction supply, urbanization and real-estate allocation rather than ordinary household access to productive living ground. Under the TBF spatial-freedom standard, state-scale land capacity therefore receives strong physical credit but little credit for family-authored settlement freedom.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (13)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score31.2536.25
Base category score31.2536.25
Capacity (25%)75.0080.00
Reach / Ecological Function (35%)50.0055.00
Friction / Loss (25%)-50.00-45.00
Return / Regeneration (15%)50.0055.00

Category point adjustment: +5.00 category points

Updated reasoning

China shows major ecological-repair capacity: 3.56 million hectares of afforestation, 4.93 million hectares of grassland restoration, improving surface-water quality and a 2025 national PM2.5 average of 28 μg/m³. The score preserves those gains while still counting air-quality failures in a significant minority of cities and the ecological pressure associated with continued coal dependence.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (15)
Sources archived after the change (7)

Mobility & Reachability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score37.5048.50
Base category score37.5048.50
Reach (35%)50.0075.00
Friction (25%)-50.00-35.00
Return / Time (15%)50.0040.00

Category point adjustment: +11.00 category points

Updated reasoning

China’s mobility capacity remains exceptional, with 17.12 billion passenger trips and 4.6 billion rail passenger trips in 2025. That infrastructure receives strong credit. Safety, time burden and genuine door-to-door family reach remain separate questions, so very large transport volume is not treated as complete mobility abundance.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (13)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score27.5021.50
Base category score27.5021.50
Capacity (25%)75.0080.00
Reach (35%)50.0035.00
Friction (25%)-50.00-55.00
Return / Delight (15%)25.0020.00

Category point adjustment: -6.00 category points

Updated reasoning

China has enormous public-life capacity: thousands of libraries, billions of library visits, millions of sports venues, major domestic tourism and substantial urban green space. The deeper pass does not assume those counts equal free everyday peace, beauty or returned family time. Public assets remain a strong positive while the TBF delight standard asks how routinely those assets become ordinary lived life.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (15)
Sources archived after the change (7)

Water & Sanitation Abundance

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score27.5042.75
Base category score27.5042.75
Capacity (25%)75.0090.00
Reach (35%)50.0070.00
Friction / Loss (25%)-50.00-35.00
Return / Regeneration (15%)25.0030.00

Category point adjustment: +15.25 category points

Updated reasoning

Basic water reach is extremely high and rural tap-water coverage reached about 96% by the end of 2025. The deeper pass also counts the sanitation gap: national reporting places rural domestic-sewage treatment around 55%, while stricter safely-managed sanitation measures remain well below basic access. Strong infrastructure therefore earns substantial credit without treating basic connection as complete water intelligence.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (15)
Sources archived after the change (7)

No individual archived source links were captured for this observation.

Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved down from #172 to #240 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#172 → #240National score-68.85 → —

Countries that moved ahead of this country (68)

  1. El Salvador #173 → #172; points -68.95 → -68.95
  2. Timor-Leste #174 → #173; points -69.09 → -69.09
  3. Mauritania #175 → #174; points -69.16 → -69.16
  4. Nicaragua #176 → #175; points -69.27 → -69.27
  5. Venezuela #177 → #176; points -69.40 → -69.40
  6. Saint Lucia #178 → #177; points -69.67 → -69.67
  7. Comoros #179 → #178; points -69.77 → -69.77
  8. Tajikistan #180 → #179; points -69.98 → -69.98
  9. São Tomé and Príncipe #181 → #180; points -70.26 → -70.26
  10. Greece #182 → #181; points -70.36 → -70.36
  11. Vanuatu #183 → #182; points -70.36 → -70.36
  12. Hong Kong #184 → #183; points -70.62 → -70.62
  13. Sri Lanka #185 → #184; points -70.85 → -70.85
  14. Kosovo #186 → #185; points -70.90 → -70.90
  15. Uganda #187 → #186; points -71.17 → -71.17
  16. Nauru #188 → #187; points -71.28 → -71.28
  17. Romania #189 → #188; points -71.47 → -71.47
  18. Sierra Leone #190 → #189; points -71.47 → -71.47
  19. Burundi #191 → #190; points -71.64 → -71.64
  20. Solomon Islands #192 → #191; points -71.64 → -71.64
  21. Liberia #193 → #192; points -71.98 → -71.98
  22. Morocco #194 → #193; points -72.08 → -72.08
  23. Madagascar #195 → #194; points -72.13 → -72.13
  24. Malawi #196 → #195; points -72.43 → -72.43
  25. Guinea-Bissau #197 → #196; points -72.72 → -72.72
  26. United States of America #198 → #197; points -72.80 → -72.80
  27. Jamaica #199 → #198; points -72.81 → -72.81
  28. Mozambique #200 → #199; points -72.82 → -72.82
  29. Burkina Faso #201 → #200; points -73.07 → -73.07
  30. Western Sahara #202 → #201; points -73.29 → -73.29
  31. Egypt #203 → #202; points -73.57 → -73.57
  32. Marshall Islands #204 → #203; points -73.68 → -73.68
  33. Puerto Rico #205 → #204; points -74.42 → -74.42
  34. Zimbabwe #206 → #205; points -74.56 → -74.56
  35. Gabon #207 → #206; points -75.85 → -75.85
  36. Honduras #208 → #207; points -76.90 → -76.90
  37. Turkmenistan #209 → #208; points -76.99 → -76.99
  38. Libya #210 → #209; points -77.22 → -77.22
  39. Djibouti #211 → #210; points -78.04 → -78.04
  40. Iran #212 → #211; points -78.37 → -78.37
  41. Nigeria #213 → #212; points -78.63 → -78.63
  42. Equatorial Guinea #214 → #213; points -79.80 → -79.80
  43. Iraq #215 → #214; points -80.27 → -80.27
  44. Pakistan #216 → #215; points -80.46 → -80.46
  45. Tanzania #217 → #216; points -80.51 → -80.51
  46. Angola #218 → #217; points -80.62 → -80.62
  47. Mali #219 → #218; points -80.95 → -80.95
  48. Cameroon #220 → #219; points -81.23 → -81.23
  49. Republic of the Congo #221 → #220; points -81.30 → -81.30
  50. Ethiopia #222 → #221; points -81.64 → -81.64
  51. Guinea #223 → #222; points -81.75 → -81.75
  52. Papua New Guinea #224 → #223; points -82.18 → -82.18
  53. Chad #225 → #224; points -82.87 → -82.87
  54. DR Congo #226 → #225; points -83.57 → -83.57
  55. Eritrea #227 → #226; points -84.07 → -84.07
  56. Ukraine #228 → #227; points -84.24 → -84.24
  57. Niger #229 → #228; points -85.59 → -85.59
  58. Syria #230 → #229; points -87.91 → -87.91
  59. Democratic People's Republic of Korea #231 → #230; points -88.20 → -88.20
  60. Somalia #232 → #231; points -88.51 → -88.51
  61. Myanmar #233 → #232; points -88.69 → -88.69
  62. Central African Republic #234 → #233; points -90.25 → -90.25
  63. Yemen #235 → #234; points -90.39 → -90.39
  64. Haiti #236 → #235; points -90.52 → -90.52
  65. Afghanistan #237 → #236; points -90.75 → -90.75
  66. South Sudan #238 → #237; points -90.79 → -90.79
  67. Sudan #239 → #238; points -93.37 → -93.37
  68. Palestine #240 → #239; points -94.71 → -94.71

Countries previously above that are no longer ranked (2)

  1. Kazakhstan Previously #120; no longer ranked in this snapshot
  2. Algeria Previously #125; no longer ranked in this snapshot
Category and evidence update

Water & Sanitation Abundance changed from 27.5 to 42.75. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Water & Sanitation Abundance

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score27.5042.75
Base category score27.5042.75
Capacity (25%)75.0090.00
Reach (35%)50.0070.00
Friction / Loss (25%)-50.00-35.00
Return / Regeneration (15%)25.0030.00

Category point adjustment: +15.25 category points

Updated reasoning

Basic water reach is extremely high and rural tap-water coverage reached about 96% by the end of 2025. The deeper pass also counts the sanitation gap: national reporting places rural domestic-sewage treatment around 55%, while stricter safely-managed sanitation measures remain well below basic access. Strong infrastructure therefore earns substantial credit without treating basic connection as complete water intelligence.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (15)
Sources archived after the change (7)
Category and evidence update

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight changed from 27.5 to 21.5. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score27.5021.50
Base category score27.5021.50
Capacity (25%)75.0080.00
Reach (35%)50.0035.00
Friction (25%)-50.00-55.00
Return / Delight (15%)25.0020.00

Category point adjustment: -6.00 category points

Updated reasoning

China has enormous public-life capacity: thousands of libraries, billions of library visits, millions of sports venues, major domestic tourism and substantial urban green space. The deeper pass does not assume those counts equal free everyday peace, beauty or returned family time. Public assets remain a strong positive while the TBF delight standard asks how routinely those assets become ordinary lived life.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (15)
Sources archived after the change (7)
Category and evidence update

Mobility & Reachability changed from 37.5 to 48.5. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Mobility & Reachability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score37.5048.50
Base category score37.5048.50
Reach (35%)50.0075.00
Friction (25%)-50.00-35.00
Return / Time (15%)50.0040.00

Category point adjustment: +11.00 category points

Updated reasoning

China’s mobility capacity remains exceptional, with 17.12 billion passenger trips and 4.6 billion rail passenger trips in 2025. That infrastructure receives strong credit. Safety, time burden and genuine door-to-door family reach remain separate questions, so very large transport volume is not treated as complete mobility abundance.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (13)
Sources archived after the change (5)
Category and evidence update

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience changed from 31.25 to 36.25. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score31.2536.25
Base category score31.2536.25
Capacity (25%)75.0080.00
Reach / Ecological Function (35%)50.0055.00
Friction / Loss (25%)-50.00-45.00
Return / Regeneration (15%)50.0055.00

Category point adjustment: +5.00 category points

Updated reasoning

China shows major ecological-repair capacity: 3.56 million hectares of afforestation, 4.93 million hectares of grassland restoration, improving surface-water quality and a 2025 national PM2.5 average of 28 μg/m³. The score preserves those gains while still counting air-quality failures in a significant minority of cities and the ecological pressure associated with continued coal dependence.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (15)
Sources archived after the change (7)
Category and evidence update

Land Access & Spatial Freedom changed from -8.75 to -17. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score-8.75-17.00
Base category score-8.75-17.00
Capacity (25%)75.0090.00
Reach (35%)-25.00-45.00
Friction / Concentration (25%)-75.00-80.00
Return / Productive Ground (15%)0.00-25.00

Category point adjustment: -8.25 category points

Updated reasoning

China has immense physical territory and state capacity to allocate land, but the national indicators available here mainly measure state construction supply, urbanization and real-estate allocation rather than ordinary household access to productive living ground. Under the TBF spatial-freedom standard, state-scale land capacity therefore receives strong physical credit but little credit for family-authored settlement freedom.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (13)
Sources archived after the change (5)
Category and evidence update

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction changed from -15 to 26. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score-15.0026.00
Base category score-15.0026.00
Capacity (25%)50.0065.00
Reach (35%)-25.0045.00
Friction (25%)-75.00-45.00
Return / Reliability (15%)0.0035.00

Category point adjustment: +41.00 category points

Updated reasoning

Physical-safety indicators improved in 2025: serious violent prosecutions and work-accident deaths declined. Institutional-friction evidence is more mixed: the independent 2025 World Justice Project index scored China at 0.48 and ranked it 92 of 143. The score keeps those evidence types separate instead of treating either official safety data or an external institutional index as the whole category.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (16)
Sources archived after the change (8)
Category and evidence update

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome changed from -7.5 to 14.5. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score-7.5014.50
Base category score-7.5014.50
Research coverage (%)100.0080.00
Entry Accessibility (25%)50.0060.00
Migrant Practical Life (30%)-25.0020.00
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome (25%)-50.00-30.00
Flexibility / Continuity (20%)0.005.00

Category point adjustment: +22.00 category points

Updated reasoning

2026-10-10 TBF four-rail full review. International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome. Four source-linked rail findings are recorded separately (capacity/reach/protection/continuity or contribution/mutuality/harm/repair). Score +14.50 is an authored evaluation of verified findings, not an official government, OECD or UN rating. Gaps in causal attribution and lived outcomes are retained; no missing data were invented.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (20)
Sources archived after the change (12)
Category and evidence update

Human Time & Burden Return changed from 1.25 to -19.5. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Human Time & Burden Return

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score1.25-19.50
Base category score1.25-19.50
Capacity (25%)75.0070.00
Reach (35%)25.00-20.00
Friction (25%)-75.00-90.00

Category point adjustment: -20.75 category points

Updated reasoning

China retains enormous productive capacity, but the life-reach reading is heavily reduced by time burden. NBS reported a 48.6-hour average enterprise workweek in 2025, while China’s own court and labour authorities have treated 996-style 9-to-9, six-day schedules as exceeding legal overtime limits. Under the TBF standard, production that consumes family time does not count as returned abundance.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (14)
Sources archived after the change (6)
Category and evidence update

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach changed from 8.75 to -14. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score8.75-14.00
Base category score8.75-14.00
Capacity (25%)75.0085.00
Reach (35%)25.00-35.00
Friction (25%)-75.00-80.00
Return / Durability (15%)0.00-20.00

Category point adjustment: -22.75 category points

Updated reasoning

China has built housing at extraordinary physical scale, yet physical inventory is not the same as ordinary family reach. In 2025 residence absorbed 21.7% of household consumption, 402.36 million square metres of commercial residential floor space remained for sale, and peer-reviewed research links higher housing costs to delayed marriage. Capacity therefore receives strong credit while access, burden return and family use are scored much lower.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (15)
Sources archived after the change (7)
Category and evidence update

Health & Care Reach changed from 31.25 to 42.75. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Health & Care Reach

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score31.2542.75
Base category score31.2542.75
Capacity (25%)75.0090.00
Reach (35%)50.0065.00
Friction (25%)-50.00-40.00

Category point adjustment: +11.50 category points

Updated reasoning

Health reach is broad: more than 90% of residents can reach nearby care within 15 minutes, basic medical insurance covers about 1.33 billion people, and life expectancy reached 79.25 years. The deeper pass separates that reach from friction: average hospital-stay and outpatient costs remain meaningful household burdens, so medical capacity is not treated as effortless care abundance.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (16)
Sources archived after the change (8)
Category and evidence update

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance changed from 27.5 to 37.75. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score27.5037.75
Base category score27.5037.75
Capacity (25%)75.0095.00
Reach (35%)50.0055.00
Friction / Waste (25%)-50.00-30.00
Return / Multiplication (15%)25.0015.00

Category point adjustment: +10.25 category points

Updated reasoning

China’s food-production capacity remains very strong: grain output reached 714.88 million tonnes and undernourishment is low. The deeper pass separates that achievement from household reach and free-food abundance: food, tobacco and liquor still represented 29.3% of household consumption expenditure in 2025, so national production does not receive the same score as food that reaches families with little money friction.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (13)
Sources archived after the change (5)
Category and evidence update

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability changed from -13.75 to -19. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score-13.75-19.00
Base category score-13.75-19.00
Capacity (25%)50.0055.00
Reach (35%)0.005.00
Friction (25%)-75.00-90.00
Return / Continuity (15%)-50.00-80.00

Category point adjustment: -5.25 category points

Updated reasoning

China retains strong cultural and institutional signals around marriage, and marriage registrations rose to 6.76 million in 2025 after registration barriers were eased. The family outcome is nevertheless severe: 7.92 million births, a 5.63‰ birth rate, -2.41‰ natural population growth, household size around 2.52 and very low fertility. The historical one-child policy is retained as context, not treated as the sole cause; current housing and time pressures also matter.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. TBF category judgment under the published 25-point anchored scoring method. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (18)
Sources archived after the change (10)
Category and evidence update

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct changed from 8.75 to -6. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score8.75-6.00
Base category score8.75-6.00
Research coverage (%)100.0078.00
Positive Contribution (25%)50.0045.00
Mutuality / Local Benefit (25%)25.0020.00
Documented Harm / Extraction (35%)-50.00-55.00
Accountability / Repair (15%)0.00-20.00

Category point adjustment: -14.75 category points

Updated reasoning

2026-10-10 TBF four-rail full review. External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct. Four source-linked rail findings are recorded separately (capacity/reach/protection/continuity or contribution/mutuality/harm/repair). Score -6.00 is an authored evaluation of verified findings, not an official government, OECD or UN rating. Gaps in causal attribution and lived outcomes are retained; no missing data were invented.

Earlier reasoning

China: documented October 18 2026 64-beleshky reassessment restored from archived audit table. External Footprint 3.1: contribution 25%, mutuality 25%, other harm/repair 20%, exporter 15%, importer 15%. 100% means 64 scoring decisions, not complete or verified national measurement. Previous historical values are retained in the WordPress event archive.

Sources archived before (20)
Sources archived after the change (12)

Load at the Speed of Light

Add App 🚀
×
Princess Keilah Studio