Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Guinea 🇬🇳

Guinea currently ranks #226 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -81.75. This country is money-gated (1.25/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Family and weakest in Housing across 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Tracking baselineEvidence through 13 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-81.8
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: -31.3 · Money Gate: 1.25/20 · Headline: -81.8.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#226of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

GuineaLast recorded move: down from #225 to #226.Recent recorded movements
  1. #225 → #22621 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500
  2. #224 → #22521 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500
  3. #212 → #22420 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #212 → #21620 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 78: rank 217. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 78: rank 226. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 78: rank 226. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 78: rank 227. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 78: rank 227. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 78: rank 226. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 78: rank 225. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 78: rank 226. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 78: rank 225. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 78: rank 224. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 78: rank 225. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 78: rank 224. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 78: rank 221. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 78: rank 219. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 78: rank 218. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 78: rank 217. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 78: rank 216. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 78: rank 224. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 78: rank 225. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 78: rank 224. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 78: rank 223. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 78: rank 222. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 78: rank 221. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 78: rank 220. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 78: rank 219. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 78: rank 218. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 78: rank 217. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 78: rank 216. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 78: rank 215. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 78: rank 214. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 78: rank 213. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 78: rank 212. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 78: rank 211. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 78: rank 210. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 78: rank 209. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 78: rank 208. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 78: rank 207. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 78: rank 206. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 78: rank 205. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 78: rank 204. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 78: rank 203. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 78: rank 202. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 78: rank 201. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 78: rank 200. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 45 of 78: rank 199. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 46 of 78: rank 198. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 47 of 78: rank 197. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 48 of 78: rank 196. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 49 of 78: rank 195. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 50 of 78: rank 194. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 51 of 78: rank 193. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 52 of 78: rank 192. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 53 of 78: rank 191. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 54 of 78: rank 190. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 55 of 78: rank 189. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 56 of 78: rank 188. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 57 of 78: rank 187. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 58 of 78: rank 186. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 59 of 78: rank 185. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 60 of 78: rank 184. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 61 of 78: rank 183. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 62 of 78: rank 182. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 63 of 78: rank 181. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 64 of 78: rank 180. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 65 of 78: rank 179. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 66 of 78: rank 178. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 67 of 78: rank 177. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 68 of 78: rank 176. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 69 of 78: rank 175. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 70 of 78: rank 173. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 71 of 78: rank 172. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 72 of 78: rank 170. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 73 of 78: rank 168. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 74 of 78: rank 192. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 75 of 78: rank 212. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 76 of 78: rank 216. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 77 of 78: rank 225. 21 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500Recorded period 78 of 78: rank 226. 21 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500NOW #226Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

100%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% = 100.00% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#119

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

0.5 / 4

Food

Why 0.5 / 4?

WFP school meals and take-home rations are genuine no-payment institutional food routes, but household-wide food access remains strongly money-gated and food insecurity is high.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
0.0 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 0.0 / 4?

No broad dependable national route to free family shelter or productive land was verified; insecure tenure and costly titling remain material frictions.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
0.5 / 4

Healthcare

Why 0.5 / 4?

Public and donor-backed health services provide meaningful no-payment care, but universal comprehensive point-of-use reach was not verified.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
0.0 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.0 / 4?

No broad zero-fare ordinary passenger transport route was verified.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
0.3 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 0.3 / 4?

Donor/public water points and electrification projects create limited zero-payment access or subsidized infrastructure, but ordinary household water and energy are not established as free national entitlements.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
Money Gate score
  • Food0.5 / 4
  • Housing / Land0.0 / 4
  • Healthcare0.5 / 4
  • Transportation0.0 / 4
  • Water / Energy0.3 / 4
  • Money still needed18.8 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 1.3 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 0.50 + Housing / Land 0.00 + Healthcare 0.50 + Transportation 0.00 + Water / Energy 0.25 = 1.25 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
72.2 / 100
Why 72.2 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -44.33) ÷ 2 = 72.17 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-46.9
Why -46.9?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 1.25 = -46.9

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-82.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence -35.0

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-82.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.8× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -27.8; Money-gated reading -80.8 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: World Bank estimates put poverty at 22.3% in 2025 even after improvement, while public revenue constraints limit infrastructure and services. For a family of five, essentials still depend heavily on cash income and unpaid household effort. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Guinea, world Bank estimates put poverty at 22.3% in 2025 even after improvement, while public revenue constraints limit infrastructure and services. For a family of five, essentials still depend heavily on cash income and unpaid household effort.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.4× 35%= -28.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -33.8; Money-gated reading -82.4 × 35% = -28.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: World Bank estimates put poverty at 22.3% in 2025 even after improvement, while public revenue constraints limit infrastructure and services. For a family of five, essentials still depend heavily on cash income and unpaid household effort. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.6× 25%= -21.4 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.8; Money-gated reading -85.6 × 25% = -21.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, employment-to-population ratio is a labour-market indicator. It does not reveal domestic care work, multiple-job overlap, commuting or daily disposable time for a family of five. Retain the earlier authored Human Time judgment until a specific time-use series is verified.

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: World Bank estimates put poverty at 22.3% in 2025 even after improvement, while public revenue constraints limit infrastructure and services. For a family of five, essentials still depend heavily on cash income and unpaid household effort. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.9× 15%= -12.3 points
Exact point calculation

-31.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -4.65 weighted points

Original evidence -31.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -31.8; Money-gated reading -81.9 × 15% = -12.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: World Bank estimates put poverty at 22.3% in 2025 even after improvement, while public revenue constraints limit infrastructure and services. For a family of five, essentials still depend heavily on cash income and unpaid household effort. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.21 + -28.85 + -21.40 + -12.28 = -82.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -34.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -82.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-34.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-35.0 Contribution to national evidence score-3.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -4.65 = -34.20

Base: -35.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -35.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -3.15 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

For Guinea, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes -3.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Guinea: employment ratio is context, not family time

For Guinea, employment-to-population ratio is a labour-market indicator. It does not reveal domestic care work, multiple-job overlap, commuting or daily disposable time for a family of five. Retain the earlier authored Human Time judgment until a specific time-use series is verified.

2026-10-14 World Bank WDI — employment-to-population ratio
Guinea: human time burden — rail 4 review

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: World Bank estimates put poverty at 22.3% in 2025 even after improvement, while public revenue constraints limit infrastructure and services. For a family of five, essentials still depend heavily on cash income and unpaid household effort. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea overview
Guinea: human time burden — rail 3 review

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: World Bank estimates put poverty at 22.3% in 2025 even after improvement, while public revenue constraints limit infrastructure and services. For a family of five, essentials still depend heavily on cash income and unpaid household effort. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea overview
Guinea: human time burden — rail 2 review

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: World Bank estimates put poverty at 22.3% in 2025 even after improvement, while public revenue constraints limit infrastructure and services. For a family of five, essentials still depend heavily on cash income and unpaid household effort. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea overview
Guinea: human time burden — rail 1 review

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: World Bank estimates put poverty at 22.3% in 2025 even after improvement, while public revenue constraints limit infrastructure and services. For a family of five, essentials still depend heavily on cash income and unpaid household effort. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea overview
Growth has not removed heavy household poverty and work pressure

For Guinea, world Bank estimates put poverty at 22.3% in 2025 even after improvement, while public revenue constraints limit infrastructure and services. For a family of five, essentials still depend heavily on cash income and unpaid household effort.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Guinea overview
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-86.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence -50.0

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-86.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-84.8× 25%= -21.2 points
Exact point calculation

-42.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.50 weighted points

Original evidence -42.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -42.8; Money-gated reading -84.8 × 25% = -21.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: World Bank urban analysis documents widespread informal and unplanned settlement in Conakry, weak basic services, limited land-registration capacity and expensive titling. No broad no-payment family shelter route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Guinea, world Bank urban analysis documents widespread informal and unplanned settlement in Conakry, weak basic services, limited land-registration capacity and expensive titling. No broad no-payment family shelter route was verified.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-86.4× 35%= -30.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-48.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -16.80 weighted points

Original evidence -48.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -48.8; Money-gated reading -86.4 × 35% = -30.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: World Bank urban analysis documents widespread informal and unplanned settlement in Conakry, weak basic services, limited land-registration capacity and expensive titling. No broad no-payment family shelter route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-89.6× 25%= -22.4 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.8; Money-gated reading -89.6 × 25% = -22.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: World Bank urban analysis documents widespread informal and unplanned settlement in Conakry, weak basic services, limited land-registration capacity and expensive titling. No broad no-payment family shelter route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.9× 15%= -12.9 points
Exact point calculation

-46.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.90 weighted points

Original evidence -46.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -46.8; Money-gated reading -85.9 × 15% = -12.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: World Bank urban analysis documents widespread informal and unplanned settlement in Conakry, weak basic services, limited land-registration capacity and expensive titling. No broad no-payment family shelter route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -21.20 + -30.24 + -22.40 + -12.88 = -86.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -49.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -50.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -86.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-49.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-50.0 Contribution to national evidence score-4.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -10.50 + -16.80 + -15.00 + -6.90 = -49.20

Base: -50.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -50.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -50.00 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -4.00 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Guinea, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes -4.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Guinea: housing shelter reach — rail 4 review

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: World Bank urban analysis documents widespread informal and unplanned settlement in Conakry, weak basic services, limited land-registration capacity and expensive titling. No broad no-payment family shelter route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Urban Sector Review
Guinea: housing shelter reach — rail 3 review

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: World Bank urban analysis documents widespread informal and unplanned settlement in Conakry, weak basic services, limited land-registration capacity and expensive titling. No broad no-payment family shelter route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Urban Sector Review
Guinea: housing shelter reach — rail 2 review

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: World Bank urban analysis documents widespread informal and unplanned settlement in Conakry, weak basic services, limited land-registration capacity and expensive titling. No broad no-payment family shelter route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Urban Sector Review
Guinea: housing shelter reach — rail 1 review

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: World Bank urban analysis documents widespread informal and unplanned settlement in Conakry, weak basic services, limited land-registration capacity and expensive titling. No broad no-payment family shelter route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Urban Sector Review
Informal settlement and costly land administration constrain secure shelter

For Guinea, world Bank urban analysis documents widespread informal and unplanned settlement in Conakry, weak basic services, limited land-registration capacity and expensive titling. No broad no-payment family shelter route was verified.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Guinea Urban Sector Review
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-84.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -40.0

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-84.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.2× 25%= -20.5 points
Exact point calculation

-32.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.00 weighted points

Original evidence -32.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -32.8; Money-gated reading -82.2 × 25% = -20.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports more than 21.8% of households struggle with food insecurity and provides nutritious school meals to over 175,000 children plus take-home rations to girls. This is genuine institutional reach, not household-wide food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Guinea, wFP reports more than 21.8% of households struggle with food insecurity and provides nutritious school meals to over 175,000 children plus take-home rations to girls. This is genuine institutional reach, not household-wide food abundance.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.7× 35%= -29.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-38.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -13.30 weighted points

Original evidence -38.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -38.8; Money-gated reading -83.7 × 35% = -29.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports more than 21.8% of households struggle with food insecurity and provides nutritious school meals to over 175,000 children plus take-home rations to girls. This is genuine institutional reach, not household-wide food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-86.9× 25%= -21.7 points
Exact point calculation

-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points

Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.8; Money-gated reading -86.9 × 25% = -21.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports more than 21.8% of households struggle with food insecurity and provides nutritious school meals to over 175,000 children plus take-home rations to girls. This is genuine institutional reach, not household-wide food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.2× 15%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

-36.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -5.40 weighted points

Original evidence -36.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -36.8; Money-gated reading -83.2 × 15% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports more than 21.8% of households struggle with food insecurity and provides nutritious school meals to over 175,000 children plus take-home rations to girls. This is genuine institutional reach, not household-wide food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.54 + -29.31 + -21.73 + -12.48 = -84.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -39.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -40.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -84.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-39.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-40.0 Contribution to national evidence score-3.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -8.00 + -13.30 + -12.50 + -5.40 = -39.20

Base: -40.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -40.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -40.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -3.60 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Guinea, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes -3.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Guinea: food nourishment free food — rail 4 review

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports more than 21.8% of households struggle with food insecurity and provides nutritious school meals to over 175,000 children plus take-home rations to girls. This is genuine institutional reach, not household-wide food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Guinea
Guinea: food nourishment free food — rail 3 review

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports more than 21.8% of households struggle with food insecurity and provides nutritious school meals to over 175,000 children plus take-home rations to girls. This is genuine institutional reach, not household-wide food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Guinea
Guinea: food nourishment free food — rail 2 review

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports more than 21.8% of households struggle with food insecurity and provides nutritious school meals to over 175,000 children plus take-home rations to girls. This is genuine institutional reach, not household-wide food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Guinea
Guinea: food nourishment free food — rail 1 review

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports more than 21.8% of households struggle with food insecurity and provides nutritious school meals to over 175,000 children plus take-home rations to girls. This is genuine institutional reach, not household-wide food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Guinea
School meals provide real free food while national food insecurity remains high

For Guinea, wFP reports more than 21.8% of households struggle with food insecurity and provides nutritious school meals to over 175,000 children plus take-home rations to girls. This is genuine institutional reach, not household-wide food abundance.

2026-10-06 World Food Programme — Guinea
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-85.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -45.0

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-85.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.5× 25%= -20.9 points
Exact point calculation

-37.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -9.25 weighted points

Original evidence -37.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -37.8; Money-gated reading -83.5 × 25% = -20.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: UNICEF reports new water and sanitation infrastructure in Labé reduced the burden of water collection for women and children and improved schools and health centres, while describing WASH access as a major continuing concern. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Guinea, uNICEF reports new water and sanitation infrastructure in Labé reduced the burden of water collection for women and children and improved schools and health centres, while describing WASH access as a major continuing concern.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.1× 35%= -29.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.25/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-43.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -15.05 weighted points

Original evidence -43.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -43.8; Money-gated reading -85.1 × 35% = -29.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: UNICEF reports new water and sanitation infrastructure in Labé reduced the burden of water collection for women and children and improved schools and health centres, while describing WASH access as a major continuing concern. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-88.3× 25%= -22.1 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.8; Money-gated reading -88.3 × 25% = -22.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: UNICEF reports new water and sanitation infrastructure in Labé reduced the burden of water collection for women and children and improved schools and health centres, while describing WASH access as a major continuing concern. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-84.5× 15%= -12.7 points
Exact point calculation

-41.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.15 weighted points

Original evidence -41.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -41.8; Money-gated reading -84.5 × 15% = -12.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: UNICEF reports new water and sanitation infrastructure in Labé reduced the burden of water collection for women and children and improved schools and health centres, while describing WASH access as a major continuing concern. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.87 + -29.78 + -22.07 + -12.67 = -85.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -44.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -45.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -85.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-44.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-45.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -9.25 + -15.05 + -13.75 + -6.15 = -44.20

Base: -45.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -45.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -45.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -2.70 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

For Guinea, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Guinea: water sanitation — rail 4 review

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: UNICEF reports new water and sanitation infrastructure in Labé reduced the burden of water collection for women and children and improved schools and health centres, while describing WASH access as a major continuing concern. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF Guinea — improving access to water, hygiene and nutrition
Guinea: water sanitation — rail 3 review

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: UNICEF reports new water and sanitation infrastructure in Labé reduced the burden of water collection for women and children and improved schools and health centres, while describing WASH access as a major continuing concern. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF Guinea — improving access to water, hygiene and nutrition
Guinea: water sanitation — rail 2 review

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: UNICEF reports new water and sanitation infrastructure in Labé reduced the burden of water collection for women and children and improved schools and health centres, while describing WASH access as a major continuing concern. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF Guinea — improving access to water, hygiene and nutrition
Guinea: water sanitation — rail 1 review

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: UNICEF reports new water and sanitation infrastructure in Labé reduced the burden of water collection for women and children and improved schools and health centres, while describing WASH access as a major continuing concern. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF Guinea — improving access to water, hygiene and nutrition
New water points return time, but safe WASH access remains uneven

For Guinea, uNICEF reports new water and sanitation infrastructure in Labé reduced the burden of water collection for women and children and improved schools and health centres, while describing WASH access as a major continuing concern.

2026-10-06 UNICEF Guinea — improving access to water, hygiene and nutrition
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-82.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence -35.0

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-82.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.8× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -27.8; Money-gated reading -80.8 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: World Bank-backed transmission and last-mile projects have expanded connections, while Guinea's 2025 Energy Compact still targets universal reliable and affordable electricity by 2030, showing the access gap is not yet closed. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

World Bank-backed transmission and last-mile projects have expanded connections, while Guinea's 2025 Energy Compact still targets universal reliable and affordable electricity by 2030, showing the access gap is not yet closed.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.4× 35%= -28.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.25/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -33.8; Money-gated reading -82.4 × 35% = -28.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: World Bank-backed transmission and last-mile projects have expanded connections, while Guinea's 2025 Energy Compact still targets universal reliable and affordable electricity by 2030, showing the access gap is not yet closed. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.6× 25%= -21.4 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.8; Money-gated reading -85.6 × 25% = -21.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: World Bank-backed transmission and last-mile projects have expanded connections, while Guinea's 2025 Energy Compact still targets universal reliable and affordable electricity by 2030, showing the access gap is not yet closed. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.9× 15%= -12.3 points
Exact point calculation

-31.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -4.65 weighted points

Original evidence -31.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -31.8; Money-gated reading -81.9 × 15% = -12.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: World Bank-backed transmission and last-mile projects have expanded connections, while Guinea's 2025 Energy Compact still targets universal reliable and affordable electricity by 2030, showing the access gap is not yet closed. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.21 + -28.85 + -21.40 + -12.28 = -82.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -34.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -82.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-34.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-35.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -4.65 = -34.20

Base: -35.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -35.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.75 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Guinea, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Guinea: energy household capability — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: World Bank-backed transmission and last-mile projects have expanded connections, while Guinea's 2025 Energy Compact still targets universal reliable and affordable electricity by 2030, showing the access gap is not yet closed. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea electricity access scale-up
Guinea: energy household capability — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: World Bank-backed transmission and last-mile projects have expanded connections, while Guinea's 2025 Energy Compact still targets universal reliable and affordable electricity by 2030, showing the access gap is not yet closed. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea electricity access scale-up
Guinea: energy household capability — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: World Bank-backed transmission and last-mile projects have expanded connections, while Guinea's 2025 Energy Compact still targets universal reliable and affordable electricity by 2030, showing the access gap is not yet closed. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea electricity access scale-up
Guinea: energy household capability — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: World Bank-backed transmission and last-mile projects have expanded connections, while Guinea's 2025 Energy Compact still targets universal reliable and affordable electricity by 2030, showing the access gap is not yet closed. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea electricity access scale-up
Electricity access is expanding from a low and unreliable base

World Bank-backed transmission and last-mile projects have expanded connections, while Guinea's 2025 Energy Compact still targets universal reliable and affordable electricity by 2030, showing the access gap is not yet closed.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Guinea electricity access scale-up
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-85.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -45.0

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-85.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.5× 25%= -20.9 points
Exact point calculation

-37.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -9.25 weighted points

Original evidence -37.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -37.8; Money-gated reading -83.5 × 25% = -20.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: WHO reports workforce, financing and facility-strengthening work toward universal health coverage. Public-health capacity has improved, but the country is still strengthening equitable financing and service reach rather than operating a universal no-friction care system. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Guinea, wHO reports workforce, financing and facility-strengthening work toward universal health coverage. Public-health capacity has improved, but the country is still strengthening equitable financing and service reach rather than operating a universal no-friction care system.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.1× 35%= -29.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 0.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-43.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -15.05 weighted points

Original evidence -43.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -43.8; Money-gated reading -85.1 × 35% = -29.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: WHO reports workforce, financing and facility-strengthening work toward universal health coverage. Public-health capacity has improved, but the country is still strengthening equitable financing and service reach rather than operating a universal no-friction care system. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-88.3× 25%= -22.1 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.8; Money-gated reading -88.3 × 25% = -22.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: WHO reports workforce, financing and facility-strengthening work toward universal health coverage. Public-health capacity has improved, but the country is still strengthening equitable financing and service reach rather than operating a universal no-friction care system. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-84.5× 15%= -12.7 points
Exact point calculation

-41.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.15 weighted points

Original evidence -41.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -41.8; Money-gated reading -84.5 × 15% = -12.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: WHO reports workforce, financing and facility-strengthening work toward universal health coverage. Public-health capacity has improved, but the country is still strengthening equitable financing and service reach rather than operating a universal no-friction care system. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.87 + -29.78 + -22.07 + -12.67 = -85.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -44.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -45.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -85.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-44.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-45.0 Contribution to national evidence score-3.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -9.25 + -15.05 + -13.75 + -6.15 = -44.20

Base: -45.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -45.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -45.00 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -3.15 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Guinea, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes -3.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Guinea: health care reach — rail 4 review

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: WHO reports workforce, financing and facility-strengthening work toward universal health coverage. Public-health capacity has improved, but the country is still strengthening equitable financing and service reach rather than operating a universal no-friction care system. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 WHO Results Report 2024–2025 — Guinea
Guinea: health care reach — rail 3 review

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: WHO reports workforce, financing and facility-strengthening work toward universal health coverage. Public-health capacity has improved, but the country is still strengthening equitable financing and service reach rather than operating a universal no-friction care system. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 WHO Results Report 2024–2025 — Guinea
Guinea: health care reach — rail 2 review

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: WHO reports workforce, financing and facility-strengthening work toward universal health coverage. Public-health capacity has improved, but the country is still strengthening equitable financing and service reach rather than operating a universal no-friction care system. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 WHO Results Report 2024–2025 — Guinea
Guinea: health care reach — rail 1 review

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: WHO reports workforce, financing and facility-strengthening work toward universal health coverage. Public-health capacity has improved, but the country is still strengthening equitable financing and service reach rather than operating a universal no-friction care system. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 WHO Results Report 2024–2025 — Guinea
Health-system capacity is improving but universal reach remains unfinished

For Guinea, wHO reports workforce, financing and facility-strengthening work toward universal health coverage. Public-health capacity has improved, but the country is still strengthening equitable financing and service reach rather than operating a universal no-friction care system.

2026-10-06 WHO Results Report 2024–2025 — Guinea
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-84.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -40.0

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-84.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-82.2× 25%= -20.5 points
Exact point calculation

-32.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.00 weighted points

Original evidence -32.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -32.8; Money-gated reading -82.2 × 25% = -20.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports 22% of primary-school-age children are out of school and uses school meals and take-home rations to improve completion. Education has public capacity, but reach and continuity remain materially constrained. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Guinea, wFP reports 22% of primary-school-age children are out of school and uses school meals and take-home rations to improve completion. Education has public capacity, but reach and continuity remain materially constrained.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-83.7× 35%= -29.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-38.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -13.30 weighted points

Original evidence -38.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -38.8; Money-gated reading -83.7 × 35% = -29.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports 22% of primary-school-age children are out of school and uses school meals and take-home rations to improve completion. Education has public capacity, but reach and continuity remain materially constrained. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-86.9× 25%= -21.7 points
Exact point calculation

-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points

Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.8; Money-gated reading -86.9 × 25% = -21.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports 22% of primary-school-age children are out of school and uses school meals and take-home rations to improve completion. Education has public capacity, but reach and continuity remain materially constrained. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-83.2× 15%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

-36.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -5.40 weighted points

Original evidence -36.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -36.8; Money-gated reading -83.2 × 15% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports 22% of primary-school-age children are out of school and uses school meals and take-home rations to improve completion. Education has public capacity, but reach and continuity remain materially constrained. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.54 + -29.31 + -21.73 + -12.48 = -84.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -39.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -40.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -84.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-39.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-40.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -8.00 + -13.30 + -12.50 + -5.40 = -39.20

Base: -40.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -40.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -40.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -2.40 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Guinea, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Guinea: education human capability — rail 4 review

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports 22% of primary-school-age children are out of school and uses school meals and take-home rations to improve completion. Education has public capacity, but reach and continuity remain materially constrained. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Guinea
Guinea: education human capability — rail 3 review

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports 22% of primary-school-age children are out of school and uses school meals and take-home rations to improve completion. Education has public capacity, but reach and continuity remain materially constrained. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Guinea
Guinea: education human capability — rail 2 review

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports 22% of primary-school-age children are out of school and uses school meals and take-home rations to improve completion. Education has public capacity, but reach and continuity remain materially constrained. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Guinea
Guinea: education human capability — rail 1 review

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: WFP reports 22% of primary-school-age children are out of school and uses school meals and take-home rations to improve completion. Education has public capacity, but reach and continuity remain materially constrained. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Guinea
School meals support attendance while exclusion from schooling remains substantial

For Guinea, wFP reports 22% of primary-school-age children are out of school and uses school meals and take-home rations to improve completion. Education has public capacity, but reach and continuity remain materially constrained.

2026-10-06 World Food Programme — Guinea
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-85.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -45.0

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-85.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-83.5× 25%= -20.9 points
Exact point calculation

-37.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -9.25 weighted points

Original evidence -37.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -37.8; Money-gated reading -83.5 × 25% = -20.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank's FY27–33 partnership framework makes expanded access to transport infrastructure a core outcome, which is evidence of both investment and a material existing mobility gap. Ordinary travel remains fare, fuel and road-access dependent. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Guinea, the World Bank's FY27–33 partnership framework makes expanded access to transport infrastructure a core outcome, which is evidence of both investment and a material existing mobility gap. Ordinary travel remains fare, fuel and road-access dependent.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-85.1× 35%= -29.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

-43.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -15.05 weighted points

Original evidence -43.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -43.8; Money-gated reading -85.1 × 35% = -29.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank's FY27–33 partnership framework makes expanded access to transport infrastructure a core outcome, which is evidence of both investment and a material existing mobility gap. Ordinary travel remains fare, fuel and road-access dependent. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-88.3× 25%= -22.1 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.8; Money-gated reading -88.3 × 25% = -22.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank's FY27–33 partnership framework makes expanded access to transport infrastructure a core outcome, which is evidence of both investment and a material existing mobility gap. Ordinary travel remains fare, fuel and road-access dependent. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-84.5× 15%= -12.7 points
Exact point calculation

-41.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.15 weighted points

Original evidence -41.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -41.8; Money-gated reading -84.5 × 15% = -12.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank's FY27–33 partnership framework makes expanded access to transport infrastructure a core outcome, which is evidence of both investment and a material existing mobility gap. Ordinary travel remains fare, fuel and road-access dependent. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.87 + -29.78 + -22.07 + -12.67 = -85.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -44.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -45.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -85.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-44.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-45.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -9.25 + -15.05 + -13.75 + -6.15 = -44.20

Base: -45.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -45.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -45.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.80 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

For Guinea, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Guinea: mobility reachability — rail 4 review

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank's FY27–33 partnership framework makes expanded access to transport infrastructure a core outcome, which is evidence of both investment and a material existing mobility gap. Ordinary travel remains fare, fuel and road-access dependent. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Country Partnership Framework
Guinea: mobility reachability — rail 3 review

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank's FY27–33 partnership framework makes expanded access to transport infrastructure a core outcome, which is evidence of both investment and a material existing mobility gap. Ordinary travel remains fare, fuel and road-access dependent. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Country Partnership Framework
Guinea: mobility reachability — rail 2 review

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank's FY27–33 partnership framework makes expanded access to transport infrastructure a core outcome, which is evidence of both investment and a material existing mobility gap. Ordinary travel remains fare, fuel and road-access dependent. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Country Partnership Framework
Guinea: mobility reachability — rail 1 review

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank's FY27–33 partnership framework makes expanded access to transport infrastructure a core outcome, which is evidence of both investment and a material existing mobility gap. Ordinary travel remains fare, fuel and road-access dependent. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Country Partnership Framework
Transport expansion is a national priority because current reach remains limited

For Guinea, the World Bank's FY27–33 partnership framework makes expanded access to transport infrastructure a core outcome, which is evidence of both investment and a material existing mobility gap. Ordinary travel remains fare, fuel and road-access dependent.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Guinea Country Partnership Framework
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-70.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence +13.0

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-70.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-68.1× 25%= -17.0 points
Exact point calculation

21.01 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Original evidence +21.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.2; Money-gated reading -68.1 × 25% = -17.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Guinea's 2024 total fertility rate was 4.131 births per woman, well above replacement and moving toward the TBF target of 5.0. Food insecurity, WASH gaps, school exclusion, housing insecurity and health constraints prevent fertility alone from producing a high family-environment score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Guinea's 2024 total fertility rate was 4.131 births per woman, well above replacement and moving toward the TBF target of 5.0. Food insecurity, WASH gaps, school exclusion, housing insecurity and health constraints prevent fertility alone from producing a high family-environment score.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-69.7× 35%= -24.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

15.01 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Original evidence +15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +14.2; Money-gated reading -69.7 × 35% = -24.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Guinea's 2024 total fertility rate was 4.131 births per woman, well above replacement and moving toward the TBF target of 5.0. Food insecurity, WASH gaps, school exclusion, housing insecurity and health constraints prevent fertility alone from producing a high family-environment score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-72.9× 25%= -18.2 points
Exact point calculation

3.01 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.75 weighted points

Original evidence +3.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +2.2; Money-gated reading -72.9 × 25% = -18.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Guinea's 2024 total fertility rate was 4.131 births per woman, well above replacement and moving toward the TBF target of 5.0. Food insecurity, WASH gaps, school exclusion, housing insecurity and health constraints prevent fertility alone from producing a high family-environment score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-69.1× 15%= -10.4 points
Exact point calculation

17.01 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.55 weighted points

Original evidence +17.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +16.2; Money-gated reading -69.1 × 15% = -10.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Guinea's 2024 total fertility rate was 4.131 births per woman, well above replacement and moving toward the TBF target of 5.0. Food insecurity, WASH gaps, school exclusion, housing insecurity and health constraints prevent fertility alone from producing a high family-environment score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -17.02 + -24.38 + -18.21 + -10.37 = -70.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +13.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: +13.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -70.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+13.8 Published family-method adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score+13.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 5.25 + 5.25 + 0.75 + 2.55 = 13.81

Base: 13.01 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +13.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 13.01 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.04 points

Why the family-method adjustment is applied

New and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Guinea, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +13.0

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: +13.0 − 0 = +13.0 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Guinea: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded by the 2026-10-10 legal-status review. Country is included in the 2026 legal-status survey under a status other than generally available domestic civil marriage. This describes legal status, not a demonstrated effect on birth rates.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2026-10-10 (access date; verify publication date in linked source) · Reviewed: 2026-10-10

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Guinea: family formation stability — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Guinea's 2024 total fertility rate was 4.131 births per woman, well above replacement and moving toward the TBF target of 5.0. Food insecurity, WASH gaps, school exclusion, housing insecurity and health constraints prevent fertility alone from producing a high family-environment score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank WDI via FRED — Guinea fertility
Guinea: family formation stability — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Guinea's 2024 total fertility rate was 4.131 births per woman, well above replacement and moving toward the TBF target of 5.0. Food insecurity, WASH gaps, school exclusion, housing insecurity and health constraints prevent fertility alone from producing a high family-environment score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank WDI via FRED — Guinea fertility
Guinea: family formation stability — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Guinea's 2024 total fertility rate was 4.131 births per woman, well above replacement and moving toward the TBF target of 5.0. Food insecurity, WASH gaps, school exclusion, housing insecurity and health constraints prevent fertility alone from producing a high family-environment score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank WDI via FRED — Guinea fertility
Guinea: family formation stability — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Guinea's 2024 total fertility rate was 4.131 births per woman, well above replacement and moving toward the TBF target of 5.0. Food insecurity, WASH gaps, school exclusion, housing insecurity and health constraints prevent fertility alone from producing a high family-environment score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank WDI via FRED — Guinea fertility
High fertility supports continuity while family conditions remain pressured

Guinea's 2024 total fertility rate was 4.131 births per woman, well above replacement and moving toward the TBF target of 5.0. Food insecurity, WASH gaps, school exclusion, housing insecurity and health constraints prevent fertility alone from producing a high family-environment score.

2026-10-06 World Bank WDI via FRED — Guinea fertility

Published indicators

Total fertility rate4.13 births per woman

World Bank WDI via FRED — Guinea fertility · 2024

Source
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-82.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence -35.0

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-82.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-80.8× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -27.8; Money-gated reading -80.8 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and UN-Habitat work documents insecure tenure, informal arrangements, land-registration limits and costly titling. Physical land capacity therefore does not translate cleanly into low-friction household access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Guinea, world Bank and UN-Habitat work documents insecure tenure, informal arrangements, land-registration limits and costly titling. Physical land capacity therefore does not translate cleanly into low-friction household access.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-82.4× 35%= -28.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -33.8; Money-gated reading -82.4 × 35% = -28.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and UN-Habitat work documents insecure tenure, informal arrangements, land-registration limits and costly titling. Physical land capacity therefore does not translate cleanly into low-friction household access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-85.6× 25%= -21.4 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.8; Money-gated reading -85.6 × 25% = -21.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and UN-Habitat work documents insecure tenure, informal arrangements, land-registration limits and costly titling. Physical land capacity therefore does not translate cleanly into low-friction household access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-81.9× 15%= -12.3 points
Exact point calculation

-31.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -4.65 weighted points

Original evidence -31.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -31.8; Money-gated reading -81.9 × 15% = -12.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and UN-Habitat work documents insecure tenure, informal arrangements, land-registration limits and costly titling. Physical land capacity therefore does not translate cleanly into low-friction household access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.21 + -28.85 + -21.40 + -12.28 = -82.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -34.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -82.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-34.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-35.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -4.65 = -34.20

Base: -35.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -35.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.75 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Guinea, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Guinea: land spatial freedom — rail 4 review

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and UN-Habitat work documents insecure tenure, informal arrangements, land-registration limits and costly titling. Physical land capacity therefore does not translate cleanly into low-friction household access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Urban Sector Review
Guinea: land spatial freedom — rail 3 review

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and UN-Habitat work documents insecure tenure, informal arrangements, land-registration limits and costly titling. Physical land capacity therefore does not translate cleanly into low-friction household access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Urban Sector Review
Guinea: land spatial freedom — rail 2 review

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and UN-Habitat work documents insecure tenure, informal arrangements, land-registration limits and costly titling. Physical land capacity therefore does not translate cleanly into low-friction household access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Urban Sector Review
Guinea: land spatial freedom — rail 1 review

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and UN-Habitat work documents insecure tenure, informal arrangements, land-registration limits and costly titling. Physical land capacity therefore does not translate cleanly into low-friction household access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Urban Sector Review
Land exists in abundance but secure usable tenure carries serious friction

For Guinea, world Bank and UN-Habitat work documents insecure tenure, informal arrangements, land-registration limits and costly titling. Physical land capacity therefore does not translate cleanly into low-friction household access.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Guinea Urban Sector Review
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-80.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -25.0

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-80.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-78.2× 25%= -19.5 points
Exact point calculation

-17.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -4.25 weighted points

Original evidence -17.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -17.8; Money-gated reading -78.2 × 25% = -19.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Guinea has extensive natural assets and a large coastline, but the World Bank still identifies infrastructure, jobs and human-development gaps as core priorities. Ordinary delight and public life therefore remain unevenly reachable rather than broadly abundance-secured. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Guinea has extensive natural assets and a large coastline, but the World Bank still identifies infrastructure, jobs and human-development gaps as core priorities. Ordinary delight and public life therefore remain unevenly reachable rather than broadly abundance-secured.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-79.8× 35%= -27.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-23.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -8.05 weighted points

Original evidence -23.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -23.8; Money-gated reading -79.8 × 35% = -27.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Guinea has extensive natural assets and a large coastline, but the World Bank still identifies infrastructure, jobs and human-development gaps as core priorities. Ordinary delight and public life therefore remain unevenly reachable rather than broadly abundance-secured. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-82.9× 25%= -20.7 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.8; Money-gated reading -82.9 × 25% = -20.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Guinea has extensive natural assets and a large coastline, but the World Bank still identifies infrastructure, jobs and human-development gaps as core priorities. Ordinary delight and public life therefore remain unevenly reachable rather than broadly abundance-secured. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-79.2× 15%= -11.9 points
Exact point calculation

-21.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.15 weighted points

Original evidence -21.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -21.8; Money-gated reading -79.2 × 15% = -11.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Guinea has extensive natural assets and a large coastline, but the World Bank still identifies infrastructure, jobs and human-development gaps as core priorities. Ordinary delight and public life therefore remain unevenly reachable rather than broadly abundance-secured. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.54 + -27.92 + -20.74 + -11.88 = -80.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -24.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -25.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -80.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-24.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-25.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -4.25 + -8.05 + -8.75 + -3.15 = -24.20

Base: -25.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -25.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -25.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.50 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Guinea, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Guinea: peace beauty delight — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Guinea has extensive natural assets and a large coastline, but the World Bank still identifies infrastructure, jobs and human-development gaps as core priorities. Ordinary delight and public life therefore remain unevenly reachable rather than broadly abundance-secured. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea overview
Guinea: peace beauty delight — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Guinea has extensive natural assets and a large coastline, but the World Bank still identifies infrastructure, jobs and human-development gaps as core priorities. Ordinary delight and public life therefore remain unevenly reachable rather than broadly abundance-secured. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea overview
Guinea: peace beauty delight — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Guinea has extensive natural assets and a large coastline, but the World Bank still identifies infrastructure, jobs and human-development gaps as core priorities. Ordinary delight and public life therefore remain unevenly reachable rather than broadly abundance-secured. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea overview
Guinea: peace beauty delight — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Guinea has extensive natural assets and a large coastline, but the World Bank still identifies infrastructure, jobs and human-development gaps as core priorities. Ordinary delight and public life therefore remain unevenly reachable rather than broadly abundance-secured. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea overview
Natural and public-life assets coexist with poverty and infrastructure constraints

Guinea has extensive natural assets and a large coastline, but the World Bank still identifies infrastructure, jobs and human-development gaps as core priorities. Ordinary delight and public life therefore remain unevenly reachable rather than broadly abundance-secured.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Guinea overview
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-81.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -30.0

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-81.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-79.5× 25%= -19.9 points
Exact point calculation

-22.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -5.50 weighted points

Original evidence -22.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -22.8; Money-gated reading -79.5 × 25% = -19.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: UNDP reports Guinea increased its climate commitments across sectors including land use and forestry and launched a climate-resilience project in 2025. The need for resilience investment shows continued exposure to climate and ecosystem pressure. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

UNDP reports Guinea increased its climate commitments across sectors including land use and forestry and launched a climate-resilience project in 2025. The need for resilience investment shows continued exposure to climate and ecosystem pressure.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-81.1× 35%= -28.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-28.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -9.80 weighted points

Original evidence -28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -28.8; Money-gated reading -81.1 × 35% = -28.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: UNDP reports Guinea increased its climate commitments across sectors including land use and forestry and launched a climate-resilience project in 2025. The need for resilience investment shows continued exposure to climate and ecosystem pressure. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-84.3× 25%= -21.1 points
Exact point calculation

-40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.00 weighted points

Original evidence -40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -40.8; Money-gated reading -84.3 × 25% = -21.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: UNDP reports Guinea increased its climate commitments across sectors including land use and forestry and launched a climate-resilience project in 2025. The need for resilience investment shows continued exposure to climate and ecosystem pressure. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-80.6× 15%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

-26.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.90 weighted points

Original evidence -26.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -26.8; Money-gated reading -80.6 × 15% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: UNDP reports Guinea increased its climate commitments across sectors including land use and forestry and launched a climate-resilience project in 2025. The need for resilience investment shows continued exposure to climate and ecosystem pressure. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.87 + -28.38 + -21.07 + -12.09 = -81.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -29.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -30.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -81.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-29.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-30.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -5.50 + -9.80 + -10.00 + -3.90 = -29.20

Base: -30.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -30.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -30.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.80 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Guinea, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Guinea: living ground resilience — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: UNDP reports Guinea increased its climate commitments across sectors including land use and forestry and launched a climate-resilience project in 2025. The need for resilience investment shows continued exposure to climate and ecosystem pressure. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNDP Climate Promise — Guinea
Guinea: living ground resilience — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: UNDP reports Guinea increased its climate commitments across sectors including land use and forestry and launched a climate-resilience project in 2025. The need for resilience investment shows continued exposure to climate and ecosystem pressure. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNDP Climate Promise — Guinea
Guinea: living ground resilience — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: UNDP reports Guinea increased its climate commitments across sectors including land use and forestry and launched a climate-resilience project in 2025. The need for resilience investment shows continued exposure to climate and ecosystem pressure. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNDP Climate Promise — Guinea
Guinea: living ground resilience — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: UNDP reports Guinea increased its climate commitments across sectors including land use and forestry and launched a climate-resilience project in 2025. The need for resilience investment shows continued exposure to climate and ecosystem pressure. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNDP Climate Promise — Guinea
Climate-resilience commitments are rising as floods and land pressures remain real

UNDP reports Guinea increased its climate commitments across sectors including land use and forestry and launched a climate-resilience project in 2025. The need for resilience investment shows continued exposure to climate and ecosystem pressure.

2026-10-06 UNDP Climate Promise — Guinea
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-85.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -45.0

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-85.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-83.5× 25%= -20.9 points
Exact point calculation

-37.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -9.25 weighted points

Original evidence -37.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -37.8; Money-gated reading -83.5 × 25% = -20.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: UNDP's 2025 regional policy work including Guinea emphasizes people-centred governance and inclusive development as foundations for state resilience, reflecting continuing institutional and participation friction rather than a fully low-friction justice environment. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

UNDP's 2025 regional policy work including Guinea emphasizes people-centred governance and inclusive development as foundations for state resilience, reflecting continuing institutional and participation friction rather than a fully low-friction justice environment.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-85.1× 35%= -29.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-43.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -15.05 weighted points

Original evidence -43.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -43.8; Money-gated reading -85.1 × 35% = -29.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: UNDP's 2025 regional policy work including Guinea emphasizes people-centred governance and inclusive development as foundations for state resilience, reflecting continuing institutional and participation friction rather than a fully low-friction justice environment. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-88.3× 25%= -22.1 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.8; Money-gated reading -88.3 × 25% = -22.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: UNDP's 2025 regional policy work including Guinea emphasizes people-centred governance and inclusive development as foundations for state resilience, reflecting continuing institutional and participation friction rather than a fully low-friction justice environment. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-84.5× 15%= -12.7 points
Exact point calculation

-41.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.15 weighted points

Original evidence -41.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -41.8; Money-gated reading -84.5 × 15% = -12.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: UNDP's 2025 regional policy work including Guinea emphasizes people-centred governance and inclusive development as foundations for state resilience, reflecting continuing institutional and participation friction rather than a fully low-friction justice environment. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.87 + -29.78 + -22.07 + -12.67 = -85.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -44.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -45.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -85.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-44.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-45.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -9.25 + -15.05 + -13.75 + -6.15 = -44.20

Base: -45.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -45.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -45.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -2.25 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Guinea, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Guinea: justice safety friction — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: UNDP's 2025 regional policy work including Guinea emphasizes people-centred governance and inclusive development as foundations for state resilience, reflecting continuing institutional and participation friction rather than a fully low-friction justice environment. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNDP — Advancing Inclusive Development
Guinea: justice safety friction — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: UNDP's 2025 regional policy work including Guinea emphasizes people-centred governance and inclusive development as foundations for state resilience, reflecting continuing institutional and participation friction rather than a fully low-friction justice environment. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNDP — Advancing Inclusive Development
Guinea: justice safety friction — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: UNDP's 2025 regional policy work including Guinea emphasizes people-centred governance and inclusive development as foundations for state resilience, reflecting continuing institutional and participation friction rather than a fully low-friction justice environment. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNDP — Advancing Inclusive Development
Guinea: justice safety friction — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: UNDP's 2025 regional policy work including Guinea emphasizes people-centred governance and inclusive development as foundations for state resilience, reflecting continuing institutional and participation friction rather than a fully low-friction justice environment. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNDP — Advancing Inclusive Development
Inclusive governance and institutional resilience remain active reform needs

UNDP's 2025 regional policy work including Guinea emphasizes people-centred governance and inclusive development as foundations for state resilience, reflecting continuing institutional and participation friction rather than a fully low-friction justice environment.

2026-10-06 UNDP — Advancing Inclusive Development
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-82.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence -35.0

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-82.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.8× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -27.8; Money-gated reading -80.8 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank notes grid modernization aims to cut commercial electricity losses from 40% in 2025 to 20% by 2030. This is meaningful repair and efficiency work, while current losses show substantial material-system friction remains. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Guinea, the World Bank notes grid modernization aims to cut commercial electricity losses from 40% in 2025 to 20% by 2030. This is meaningful repair and efficiency work, while current losses show substantial material-system friction remains.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.4× 35%= -28.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -33.8; Money-gated reading -82.4 × 35% = -28.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank notes grid modernization aims to cut commercial electricity losses from 40% in 2025 to 20% by 2030. This is meaningful repair and efficiency work, while current losses show substantial material-system friction remains. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.6× 25%= -21.4 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.8; Money-gated reading -85.6 × 25% = -21.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank notes grid modernization aims to cut commercial electricity losses from 40% in 2025 to 20% by 2030. This is meaningful repair and efficiency work, while current losses show substantial material-system friction remains. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.9× 15%= -12.3 points
Exact point calculation

-31.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -4.65 weighted points

Original evidence -31.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -31.8; Money-gated reading -81.9 × 15% = -12.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank notes grid modernization aims to cut commercial electricity losses from 40% in 2025 to 20% by 2030. This is meaningful repair and efficiency work, while current losses show substantial material-system friction remains. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.21 + -28.85 + -21.40 + -12.28 = -82.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -34.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -82.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-34.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-35.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -4.65 = -34.20

Base: -35.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -35.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.40 points

Material transfers: scored in International Footprint

Exporter responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint); importer responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint). Material movement is a real workload; these are TBF authored judgments, not certified illegal dumping estimates. Each role is included ONCE in the Footprint 3.1 published score.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

The material-transfer burden already affects the published score. Facility-specific downstream harm remains a separate research claim. No second penalty is added for the same trade.

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Guinea, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Guinea: durability material return — rail 4 review

For Guinea, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank notes grid modernization aims to cut commercial electricity losses from 40% in 2025 to 20% by 2030. This is meaningful repair and efficiency work, while current losses show substantial material-system friction remains. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea electricity surge
Guinea: durability material return — rail 3 review

For Guinea, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank notes grid modernization aims to cut commercial electricity losses from 40% in 2025 to 20% by 2030. This is meaningful repair and efficiency work, while current losses show substantial material-system friction remains. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea electricity surge
Guinea: durability material return — rail 2 review

For Guinea, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank notes grid modernization aims to cut commercial electricity losses from 40% in 2025 to 20% by 2030. This is meaningful repair and efficiency work, while current losses show substantial material-system friction remains. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea electricity surge
Guinea: durability material return — rail 1 review

For Guinea, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: The World Bank notes grid modernization aims to cut commercial electricity losses from 40% in 2025 to 20% by 2030. This is meaningful repair and efficiency work, while current losses show substantial material-system friction remains. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea electricity surge
Major infrastructure investment is expanding capability but maintenance and losses remain costly

For Guinea, the World Bank notes grid modernization aims to cut commercial electricity losses from 40% in 2025 to 20% by 2030. This is meaningful repair and efficiency work, while current losses show substantial material-system friction remains.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Guinea electricity surge
6% weight International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
-74.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -2.5

International score breakdown

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

-74.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Entry Accessibility 25%
See all nine International Welcome Entry Accessibility scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-73.4× 25%= -18.4 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -73.4 × 25% = -18.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, lawful entry and practical travel options, visa rules and reachable borders. Prior researched country observation: UNHCR reported 1,539 refugees in the Conakry region by June 2025 and works with the national refugee commission on protection and durable solutions. This is positive human-welcome evidence, retained as unscored policy evidence. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Guinea, uNHCR reported 1,539 refugees in the Conakry region by June 2025 and works with the national refugee commission on protection and durable solutions. This is positive human-welcome evidence, retained as unscored policy evidence.

🤔
Migrant Practical Life 30%
See all nine International Welcome Migrant Practical Life scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-76.1× 30%= -22.8 points
Exact point calculation

-10.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = -3.00 weighted points

Original evidence -10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -10.0; Money-gated reading -76.1 × 30% = -22.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, migration, residency and actual ability to live safely with services. Prior researched country observation: UNHCR reported 1,539 refugees in the Conakry region by June 2025 and works with the national refugee commission on protection and durable solutions. This is positive human-welcome evidence, retained as unscored policy evidence. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome 25%
See all nine International Welcome Refugee / Neighbour Welcome scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-70.8× 25%= -17.7 points
Exact point calculation

10.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 2.50 weighted points

Original evidence +10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +10.0; Money-gated reading -70.8 × 25% = -17.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, refugee reception, host communities and international protection. Prior researched country observation: UNHCR reported 1,539 refugees in the Conakry region by June 2025 and works with the national refugee commission on protection and durable solutions. This is positive human-welcome evidence, retained as unscored policy evidence. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Flexibility / Continuity 20%
See all nine International Welcome Flexibility / Continuity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-76.1× 20%= -15.2 points
Exact point calculation

-10.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = -2.00 weighted points

Original evidence -10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -10.0; Money-gated reading -76.1 × 20% = -15.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, family unity, citizenship continuity and predictable renewal of stay. Prior researched country observation: UNHCR reported 1,539 refugees in the Conakry region by June 2025 and works with the national refugee commission on protection and durable solutions. This is positive human-welcome evidence, retained as unscored policy evidence. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -18.36 + -22.83 + -17.70 + -15.21 = -74.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -2.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -2.5. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -74.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-2.5 Original evidence category score-2.5 Contribution to national evidence score-0.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 0.00 + -3.00 + 2.50 + -2.00 = -2.50

Base: -2.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -2.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -2.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.15 points

For Guinea, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

Guinea: international access human welcome — rail 4 review

For Guinea, family unity, citizenship continuity and predictable renewal of stay. Prior researched country observation: UNHCR reported 1,539 refugees in the Conakry region by June 2025 and works with the national refugee commission on protection and durable solutions. This is positive human-welcome evidence, retained as unscored policy evidence. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNHCR — Guinea
Guinea: international access human welcome — rail 3 review

For Guinea, refugee reception, host communities and international protection. Prior researched country observation: UNHCR reported 1,539 refugees in the Conakry region by June 2025 and works with the national refugee commission on protection and durable solutions. This is positive human-welcome evidence, retained as unscored policy evidence. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNHCR — Guinea
Guinea: international access human welcome — rail 2 review

For Guinea, migration, residency and actual ability to live safely with services. Prior researched country observation: UNHCR reported 1,539 refugees in the Conakry region by June 2025 and works with the national refugee commission on protection and durable solutions. This is positive human-welcome evidence, retained as unscored policy evidence. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNHCR — Guinea
Guinea: international access human welcome — rail 1 review

For Guinea, lawful entry and practical travel options, visa rules and reachable borders. Prior researched country observation: UNHCR reported 1,539 refugees in the Conakry region by June 2025 and works with the national refugee commission on protection and durable solutions. This is positive human-welcome evidence, retained as unscored policy evidence. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNHCR — Guinea
Guinea hosts refugees with durable-solution support

For Guinea, uNHCR reported 1,539 refugees in the Conakry region by June 2025 and works with the national refugee commission on protection and durable solutions. This is positive human-welcome evidence, retained as unscored policy evidence.

2026-10-06 UNHCR — Guinea
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-77.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence -15.3

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-77.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Positive Contribution 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-73.0× 25%= -18.2 points
Exact point calculation

-5.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -1.25 weighted points

Original evidence -5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +1.8; Money-gated reading -73.0 × 25% = -18.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, helpful international contributions and transferable capacity. Prior researched country observation: World Bank analysis expects major mining expansion and stresses the need to transform resource revenues into diversified, job-rich growth and human development. This evidence is retained without a policy score or unsupported harm claim. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Guinea, world Bank analysis expects major mining expansion and stresses the need to transform resource revenues into diversified, job-rich growth and human development. This evidence is retained without a policy score or unsupported harm claim.

🤔
Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-77.0× 25%= -19.2 points
Exact point calculation

-20.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -5.00 weighted points

Original evidence -20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -13.3; Money-gated reading -77.0 × 25% = -19.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, mutuality, dignity and shared benefit to residents and partner communities. Prior researched country observation: World Bank analysis expects major mining expansion and stresses the need to transform resource revenues into diversified, job-rich growth and human development. This evidence is retained without a policy score or unsupported harm claim. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-83.6× 35%= -29.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -15.75 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -38.3; Money-gated reading -83.6 × 35% = -29.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, external social/ecological harm and attempted repair. Prior researched country observation: World Bank analysis expects major mining expansion and stresses the need to transform resource revenues into diversified, job-rich growth and human development. This evidence is retained without a policy score or unsupported harm claim. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Accountability / Repair 15%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-71.6× 15%= -10.8 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +6.8; Money-gated reading -71.6 × 15% = -10.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Guinea, trade-flow scrutiny: volume/handling unknown unless a dated customs record is present. Prior researched country observation: World Bank analysis expects major mining expansion and stresses the need to transform resource revenues into diversified, job-rich growth and human development. This evidence is retained without a policy score or unsupported harm claim. HS3915 export/import weights and destination-processing pathways were not independently confirmed in this pass; no illegal dumping or zero trade is asserted. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -18.24 + -19.24 + -29.26 + -10.75 = -77.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -22.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): +6.8. Effective evidence: -15.3. Money Gate ceiling: -46.9. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -77.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-22.0 Published research adjustment+6.8 Original evidence category score-15.3 Contribution to national evidence score-0.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -1.25 + -5.00 + -15.75 + 0.00 = -22.00

Base: -15.25 · reviewed adjustment: 6.75 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -15.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -15.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.92 points

Material transfers: scored in International Footprint

Exporter responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint); importer responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint). Material movement is a real workload; these are TBF authored judgments, not certified illegal dumping estimates. Each role is included ONCE in the Footprint 3.1 published score.

Exported waste / garbageRole: 0.00/100 · scored
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingRole: 0.00/100 · scored

The material-transfer burden already affects the published score. Facility-specific downstream harm remains a separate research claim. No second penalty is added for the same trade.

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

TBF provisional footprint ordinal judgment: 25% useful contribution + 25% mutual benefit + 20% non-trade harm/repair + 15% exporter + 15% importer. HS3915 exporter/importer role unverified; two trade inputs remain unassessed (0 neutral placeholder, NOT proof zero waste or no harm). Trade inputs may change the category when substantiated. No second waste deduction.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Guinea, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Guinea’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

Guinea: external footprint non extractive — rail 4 review

For Guinea, trade-flow scrutiny: volume/handling unknown unless a dated customs record is present. Prior researched country observation: World Bank analysis expects major mining expansion and stresses the need to transform resource revenues into diversified, job-rich growth and human development. This evidence is retained without a policy score or unsupported harm claim. HS3915 export/import weights and destination-processing pathways were not independently confirmed in this pass; no illegal dumping or zero trade is asserted. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Economic Update 2025
Guinea: external footprint non extractive — rail 3 review

For Guinea, external social/ecological harm and attempted repair. Prior researched country observation: World Bank analysis expects major mining expansion and stresses the need to transform resource revenues into diversified, job-rich growth and human development. This evidence is retained without a policy score or unsupported harm claim. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Economic Update 2025
Guinea: external footprint non extractive — rail 2 review

For Guinea, mutuality, dignity and shared benefit to residents and partner communities. Prior researched country observation: World Bank analysis expects major mining expansion and stresses the need to transform resource revenues into diversified, job-rich growth and human development. This evidence is retained without a policy score or unsupported harm claim. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Economic Update 2025
Guinea: external footprint non extractive — rail 1 review

For Guinea, helpful international contributions and transferable capacity. Prior researched country observation: World Bank analysis expects major mining expansion and stresses the need to transform resource revenues into diversified, job-rich growth and human development. This evidence is retained without a policy score or unsupported harm claim. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Guinea Economic Update 2025
Mining-led growth creates capacity alongside an unresolved extraction question

For Guinea, world Bank analysis expects major mining expansion and stresses the need to transform resource revenues into diversified, job-rich growth and human development. This evidence is retained without a policy score or unsupported harm claim.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Guinea Economic Update 2025

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.