Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Indonesia 🇮🇩

Indonesia currently ranks #142 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -65.30. This country is money-gated (1.50/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Energy and weakest in Welcome across 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Tracking baselineEvidence through 10 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-65.3
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: +29.1 · Money Gate: 1.50/20 · Headline: -65.3.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#142of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

IndonesiaLast recorded move: down from #141 to #142.Recent recorded movements
  1. #141 → #14221 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500
  2. #140 → #14121 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500
  3. #130 → #14020 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #130 → #13320 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 60: rank 128. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 60: rank 130. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 60: rank 131. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 60: rank 131. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 9 Oct 2026 · 07:51 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 60: rank 130. 9 Oct 2026 · 12:04 GMT-0500 – 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 60: rank 131. 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 60: rank 132. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 60: rank 146. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 60: rank 146. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 60: rank 147. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 60: rank 146. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 60: rank 145. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 60: rank 144. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 60: rank 145. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 60: rank 144. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 60: rank 145. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 60: rank 144. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 60: rank 143. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 60: rank 142. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 60: rank 144. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 60: rank 143. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 60: rank 142. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 60: rank 141. 17 Oct 2026 · 03:54 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 60: rank 140. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 60: rank 139. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 60: rank 138. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 60: rank 137. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 60: rank 136. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 60: rank 135. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 60: rank 134. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 60: rank 133. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 60: rank 132. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 60: rank 131. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 60: rank 130. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 60: rank 129. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 60: rank 128. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 60: rank 127. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 60: rank 126. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 60: rank 125. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 60: rank 124. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 60: rank 123. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 60: rank 122. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 60: rank 121. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 60: rank 120. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 45 of 60: rank 119. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 46 of 60: rank 118. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 47 of 60: rank 117. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 48 of 60: rank 116. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 49 of 60: rank 115. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 50 of 60: rank 114. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 51 of 60: rank 113. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 52 of 60: rank 112. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 53 of 60: rank 110. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 54 of 60: rank 109. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 55 of 60: rank 108. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 56 of 60: rank 120. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 57 of 60: rank 130. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 58 of 60: rank 133. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 59 of 60: rank 141. 21 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500Recorded period 60 of 60: rank 142. 21 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500NOW #142Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

97%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 76.0% + 6.0 × 76.0% = 97.12% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#17

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

0.5 / 4

Food

Why 0.5 / 4?

The Free Nutritious Meals (MBG) school feeding programme is concrete, but household food outside the target population remains payable.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
0.3 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 0.3 / 4?

BPS reports only 68.4% of households in adequate housing in 2025; an overall no-charge permanent-housing entitlement has not been verified.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
0.8 / 4

Healthcare

Why 0.8 / 4?

Indonesia has a national health insurance scheme with public subsidy for some members; direct free care for everyone is not documented in the source set.

Point calculation

0.75 ÷ 4 × 100 = 18.75% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
0.0 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.0 / 4?

Travel networks and fare payment cannot be converted to an unsupported nationwide free transport score.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
0.0 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 0.0 / 4?

High electrification describes connection, not payment-free electricity and water; nationwide free tariffs are not confirmed.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
Money Gate score
  • Food0.5 / 4
  • Housing / Land0.3 / 4
  • Healthcare0.8 / 4
  • Transportation0.0 / 4
  • Water / Energy0.0 / 4
  • Money still needed18.5 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 1.5 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 0.50 + Housing / Land 0.25 + Healthcare 0.75 + Transportation 0.00 + Water / Energy 0.00 = 1.50 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
76.2 / 100
Why 76.2 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -52.44) ÷ 2 = 76.22 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-46.3
Why -46.3?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 1.50 = -46.3

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-67.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +22.3

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-67.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.0× 25%= -14.3 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -57.0 × 25% = -14.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Indonesia, bPS counted a 154.0 million labour force in August 2025 with 4.85% open unemployment and an average employee wage of IDR 3.33 million. SUPAS 2025 separately counted about 11 million commuters. These figures show large productive capacity, but ordinary family life still depends heavily on paid work and repeated travel rather than abundance being reachable without cash.

For Indonesia, bPS counted a 154.0 million labour force in August 2025 with 4.85% open unemployment and an average employee wage of IDR 3.33 million. SUPAS 2025 separately counted about 11 million commuters. These figures show large productive capacity, but ordinary family life still depends heavily on paid work and repeated travel rather than abundance being reachable without cash.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-61.0× 35%= -21.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -61.0 × 35% = -21.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, bPS counted a 154.0 million labour force in August 2025 with 4.85% open unemployment and an average employee wage of IDR 3.33 million. SUPAS 2025 separately counted about 11 million commuters. These figures show large productive capacity, but ordinary family life still depends heavily on paid work and repeated travel rather than abundance being reachable without cash.

For Indonesia, bPS counted a 154.0 million labour force in August 2025 with 4.85% open unemployment and an average employee wage of IDR 3.33 million. SUPAS 2025 separately counted about 11 million commuters. These figures show large productive capacity, but ordinary family life still depends heavily on paid work and repeated travel rather than abundance being reachable without cash.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-87.9× 25%= -22.0 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.9 × 25% = -22.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, bPS counted a 154.0 million labour force in August 2025 with 4.85% open unemployment and an average employee wage of IDR 3.33 million. SUPAS 2025 separately counted about 11 million commuters. These figures show large productive capacity, but ordinary family life still depends heavily on paid work and repeated travel rather than abundance being reachable without cash.

For Indonesia, bPS counted a 154.0 million labour force in August 2025 with 4.85% open unemployment and an average employee wage of IDR 3.33 million. SUPAS 2025 separately counted about 11 million commuters. These figures show large productive capacity, but ordinary family life still depends heavily on paid work and repeated travel rather than abundance being reachable without cash.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-63.7× 15%= -9.6 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.7 × 15% = -9.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, bPS counted a 154.0 million labour force in August 2025 with 4.85% open unemployment and an average employee wage of IDR 3.33 million. SUPAS 2025 separately counted about 11 million commuters. These figures show large productive capacity, but ordinary family life still depends heavily on paid work and repeated travel rather than abundance being reachable without cash.

For Indonesia, bPS counted a 154.0 million labour force in August 2025 with 4.85% open unemployment and an average employee wage of IDR 3.33 million. SUPAS 2025 separately counted about 11 million commuters. These figures show large productive capacity, but ordinary family life still depends heavily on paid work and repeated travel rather than abundance being reachable without cash.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.25 + -21.36 + -21.98 + -9.56 = -67.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +22.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +22.3. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -67.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+22.3 Original evidence category score+22.3 Contribution to national evidence score+2.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 15.00 + 15.75 + -13.75 + 5.25 = 22.25

Base: 22.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +22.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 22.25 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.06 points

For Indonesia, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — human-time-burden domestic evidence retained

For Indonesia, bPS counted a 154.0 million labour force in August 2025 with 4.85% open unemployment and an average employee wage of IDR 3.33 million. SUPAS 2025 separately counted about 11 million commuters. These figures show large productive capacity, but ordinary family life still depends heavily on paid work and repeated travel rather than abundance being reachable without cash.

2026-10-11 BPS — Labor Force Situation in Indonesia August 2025 · BPS — SUPAS 2025
Indonesia: large labour capacity still leaves families carrying cash and travel burdens

For Indonesia, bPS counted a 154.0 million labour force in August 2025 with 4.85% open unemployment and an average employee wage of IDR 3.33 million. SUPAS 2025 separately counted about 11 million commuters. These figures show large productive capacity, but ordinary family life still depends heavily on paid work and repeated travel rather than abundance being reachable without cash.

2026-10-05 BPS — Labor Force Situation in Indonesia August 2025 · BPS — SUPAS 2025
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-66.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +23.0

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-66.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-55.7× 25%= -13.9 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.7 × 25% = -13.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Indonesia, bPS reports 68.40% of households had access to adequate housing in 2025. Among the bottom 40% expenditure group the figure was only 61.11%, showing that a large national housing stock does not yet translate into secure adequate shelter for everyone and that reach remains linked to household resources.

For Indonesia, bPS reports 68.40% of households had access to adequate housing in 2025. Among the bottom 40% expenditure group the figure was only 61.11%, showing that a large national housing stock does not yet translate into secure adequate shelter for everyone and that reach remains linked to household resources.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-61.0× 35%= -21.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -61.0 × 35% = -21.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, bPS reports 68.40% of households had access to adequate housing in 2025. Among the bottom 40% expenditure group the figure was only 61.11%, showing that a large national housing stock does not yet translate into secure adequate shelter for everyone and that reach remains linked to household resources.

For Indonesia, bPS reports 68.40% of households had access to adequate housing in 2025. Among the bottom 40% expenditure group the figure was only 61.11%, showing that a large national housing stock does not yet translate into secure adequate shelter for everyone and that reach remains linked to household resources.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-89.3× 25%= -22.3 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -89.3 × 25% = -22.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, bPS reports 68.40% of households had access to adequate housing in 2025. Among the bottom 40% expenditure group the figure was only 61.11%, showing that a large national housing stock does not yet translate into secure adequate shelter for everyone and that reach remains linked to household resources.

For Indonesia, bPS reports 68.40% of households had access to adequate housing in 2025. Among the bottom 40% expenditure group the figure was only 61.11%, showing that a large national housing stock does not yet translate into secure adequate shelter for everyone and that reach remains linked to household resources.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-62.4× 15%= -9.4 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -62.4 × 15% = -9.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, bPS reports 68.40% of households had access to adequate housing in 2025. Among the bottom 40% expenditure group the figure was only 61.11%, showing that a large national housing stock does not yet translate into secure adequate shelter for everyone and that reach remains linked to household resources.

For Indonesia, bPS reports 68.40% of households had access to adequate housing in 2025. Among the bottom 40% expenditure group the figure was only 61.11%, showing that a large national housing stock does not yet translate into secure adequate shelter for everyone and that reach remains linked to household resources.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.91 + -21.36 + -22.31 + -9.36 = -66.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +23.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +23.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -66.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+23.0 Original evidence category score+23.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 16.25 + 15.75 + -15.00 + 6.00 = 23.00

Base: 23.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +23.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 23.00 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.89 points

For Indonesia, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — housing-shelter-reach domestic evidence retained

For Indonesia, bPS reports 68.40% of households had access to adequate housing in 2025. Among the bottom 40% expenditure group the figure was only 61.11%, showing that a large national housing stock does not yet translate into secure adequate shelter for everyone and that reach remains linked to household resources.

2026-10-11 BPS — Households with access to adequate housing, 2025 · BPS — Adequate housing by expenditure group
Indonesia: adequate-housing reach remains incomplete and unequal by household resources

For Indonesia, bPS reports 68.40% of households had access to adequate housing in 2025. Among the bottom 40% expenditure group the figure was only 61.11%, showing that a large national housing stock does not yet translate into secure adequate shelter for everyone and that reach remains linked to household resources.

2026-10-05 BPS — Households with access to adequate housing, 2025 · BPS — Adequate housing by expenditure group
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-62.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +40.8

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-62.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-50.3× 25%= -12.6 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -50.3 × 25% = -12.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meals programme is one of the clearest present-day movements toward food outside monetary gatekeeping. By 3 March 2026, BGN reported 61.24 million beneficiaries, including 49.06 million school students. That deserves substantial Reach credit. It still does not mean all meals for all people are free: BPS reported 24.06 million people below the national poverty line in September 2024 and food made up 74.50% of that minimum-needs line.

Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meals programme is one of the clearest present-day movements toward food outside monetary gatekeeping. By 3 March 2026, BGN reported 61.24 million beneficiaries, including 49.06 million school students. That deserves substantial Reach credit. It still does not mean all meals for all people are free: BPS reported 24.06 million people below the national poverty line in September 2024 and food made up 74.50% of that minimum-needs line.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.0× 35%= -20.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -57.0 × 35% = -20.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meals programme is one of the clearest present-day movements toward food outside monetary gatekeeping. By 3 March 2026, BGN reported 61.24 million beneficiaries, including 49.06 million school students. That deserves substantial Reach credit. It still does not mean all meals for all people are free: BPS reported 24.06 million people below the national poverty line in September 2024 and food made up 74.50% of that minimum-needs line.

Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meals programme is one of the clearest present-day movements toward food outside monetary gatekeeping. By 3 March 2026, BGN reported 61.24 million beneficiaries, including 49.06 million school students. That deserves substantial Reach credit. It still does not mean all meals for all people are free: BPS reported 24.06 million people below the national poverty line in September 2024 and food made up 74.50% of that minimum-needs line.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.2× 25%= -21.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -85.2 × 25% = -21.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meals programme is one of the clearest present-day movements toward food outside monetary gatekeeping. By 3 March 2026, BGN reported 61.24 million beneficiaries, including 49.06 million school students. That deserves substantial Reach credit. It still does not mean all meals for all people are free: BPS reported 24.06 million people below the national poverty line in September 2024 and food made up 74.50% of that minimum-needs line.

Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meals programme is one of the clearest present-day movements toward food outside monetary gatekeeping. By 3 March 2026, BGN reported 61.24 million beneficiaries, including 49.06 million school students. That deserves substantial Reach credit. It still does not mean all meals for all people are free: BPS reported 24.06 million people below the national poverty line in September 2024 and food made up 74.50% of that minimum-needs line.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-55.7× 15%= -8.4 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.7 × 15% = -8.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meals programme is one of the clearest present-day movements toward food outside monetary gatekeeping. By 3 March 2026, BGN reported 61.24 million beneficiaries, including 49.06 million school students. That deserves substantial Reach credit. It still does not mean all meals for all people are free: BPS reported 24.06 million people below the national poverty line in September 2024 and food made up 74.50% of that minimum-needs line.

Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meals programme is one of the clearest present-day movements toward food outside monetary gatekeeping. By 3 March 2026, BGN reported 61.24 million beneficiaries, including 49.06 million school students. That deserves substantial Reach credit. It still does not mean all meals for all people are free: BPS reported 24.06 million people below the national poverty line in September 2024 and food made up 74.50% of that minimum-needs line.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.57 + -19.95 + -21.30 + -8.35 = -62.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +40.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +40.8. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -62.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+40.8 Original evidence category score+40.8 Contribution to national evidence score+3.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 21.00 + -11.25 + 9.75 = 40.75

Base: 40.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +40.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 40.75 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 3.78 points

For Indonesia, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — food-nourishment-free-food domestic evidence retained

Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meals programme is one of the clearest present-day movements toward food outside monetary gatekeeping. By 3 March 2026, BGN reported 61.24 million beneficiaries, including 49.06 million school students. That deserves substantial Reach credit. It still does not mean all meals for all people are free: BPS reported 24.06 million people below the national poverty line in September 2024 and food made up 74.50% of that minimum-needs line.

2026-10-11 National Nutrition Agency (BGN) — MBG beneficiaries · BPS — Poverty profile September 2024
Indonesia: the MBG free-meal rollout is a major abundance gain, but it does not remove the wider food money gate

Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meals programme is one of the clearest present-day movements toward food outside monetary gatekeeping. By 3 March 2026, BGN reported 61.24 million beneficiaries, including 49.06 million school students. That deserves substantial Reach credit. It still does not mean all meals for all people are free: BPS reported 24.06 million people below the national poverty line in September 2024 and food made up 74.50% of that minimum-needs line.

2026-10-05 National Nutrition Agency (BGN) — MBG beneficiaries · BPS — Poverty profile September 2024
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-62.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +38.3

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-62.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-51.6× 25%= -12.9 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -51.6 × 25% = -12.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Indonesia, bPS reports 93.22% of households had access to an improved drinking-water source in 2025, but only 44.24% used safely managed drinking-water services. Adequate sanitation reached 85.37%. The gap between basic/improved access and reliably safe managed water is therefore still large.

For Indonesia, bPS reports 93.22% of households had access to an improved drinking-water source in 2025, but only 44.24% used safely managed drinking-water services. Adequate sanitation reached 85.37%. The gap between basic/improved access and reliably safe managed water is therefore still large.

Indonesia BPS housing indicator series records 92.64% of households with improved drinking-water access in 2024, a service-access measure; it does not show whether drinking water is free of charge or reliably safe at point of use.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-55.7× 35%= -19.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.7 × 35% = -19.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, bPS reports 93.22% of households had access to an improved drinking-water source in 2025, but only 44.24% used safely managed drinking-water services. Adequate sanitation reached 85.37%. The gap between basic/improved access and reliably safe managed water is therefore still large.

For Indonesia, bPS reports 93.22% of households had access to an improved drinking-water source in 2025, but only 44.24% used safely managed drinking-water services. Adequate sanitation reached 85.37%. The gap between basic/improved access and reliably safe managed water is therefore still large.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.2× 25%= -21.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -85.2 × 25% = -21.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, bPS reports 93.22% of households had access to an improved drinking-water source in 2025, but only 44.24% used safely managed drinking-water services. Adequate sanitation reached 85.37%. The gap between basic/improved access and reliably safe managed water is therefore still large.

For Indonesia, bPS reports 93.22% of households had access to an improved drinking-water source in 2025, but only 44.24% used safely managed drinking-water services. Adequate sanitation reached 85.37%. The gap between basic/improved access and reliably safe managed water is therefore still large.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-61.0× 15%= -9.2 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -61.0 × 15% = -9.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, bPS reports 93.22% of households had access to an improved drinking-water source in 2025, but only 44.24% used safely managed drinking-water services. Adequate sanitation reached 85.37%. The gap between basic/improved access and reliably safe managed water is therefore still large.

For Indonesia, bPS reports 93.22% of households had access to an improved drinking-water source in 2025, but only 44.24% used safely managed drinking-water services. Adequate sanitation reached 85.37%. The gap between basic/improved access and reliably safe managed water is therefore still large.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.91 + -19.48 + -21.30 + -9.16 = -62.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +38.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +38.3. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -62.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+38.3 Original evidence category score+38.3 Contribution to national evidence score+2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 22.75 + -11.25 + 6.75 = 38.25

Base: 38.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +38.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 38.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.36 points

For Indonesia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — water-sanitation domestic evidence retained

For Indonesia, bPS reports 93.22% of households had access to an improved drinking-water source in 2025, but only 44.24% used safely managed drinking-water services. Adequate sanitation reached 85.37%. The gap between basic/improved access and reliably safe managed water is therefore still large.

2026-10-11 BPS — Safely managed drinking water services, 2025 · BPS — Adequate sanitation, 2025
Indonesia: improved-water reach is high, but safely managed water remains far from universal

For Indonesia, bPS reports 93.22% of households had access to an improved drinking-water source in 2025, but only 44.24% used safely managed drinking-water services. Adequate sanitation reached 85.37%. The gap between basic/improved access and reliably safe managed water is therefore still large.

2026-10-05 BPS — Safely managed drinking water services, 2025 · BPS — Adequate sanitation, 2025
2026-10-21 second-batch source check - IDN - BPS Housing Indicators: improved drinking water access in 2024

Indonesia BPS housing indicator series records 92.64% of households with improved drinking-water access in 2024, a service-access measure; it does not show whether drinking water is free of charge or reliably safe at point of use.

BPS-Statistics Indonesia
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-59.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +50.0

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-59.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-50.3× 25%= -12.6 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -50.3 × 25% = -12.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Indonesia’s Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources reported an electrification ratio of 99.83% in 2026. That is a very strong physical-reach achievement. Connection alone does not prove uninterrupted, affordable household energy or remove the continuing fuel and appliance costs families carry, so the score preserves a substantial gap between connection and money-free capability.

Indonesia’s Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources reported an electrification ratio of 99.83% in 2026. That is a very strong physical-reach achievement. Connection alone does not prove uninterrupted, affordable household energy or remove the continuing fuel and appliance costs families carry, so the score preserves a substantial gap between connection and money-free capability.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-51.6× 35%= -18.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

80.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 28.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -51.6 × 35% = -18.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Indonesia’s Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources reported an electrification ratio of 99.83% in 2026. That is a very strong physical-reach achievement. Connection alone does not prove uninterrupted, affordable household energy or remove the continuing fuel and appliance costs families carry, so the score preserves a substantial gap between connection and money-free capability.

Indonesia’s Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources reported an electrification ratio of 99.83% in 2026. That is a very strong physical-reach achievement. Connection alone does not prove uninterrupted, affordable household energy or remove the continuing fuel and appliance costs families carry, so the score preserves a substantial gap between connection and money-free capability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.2× 25%= -20.3 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.0; Money-gated reading -81.2 × 25% = -20.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Indonesia’s Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources reported an electrification ratio of 99.83% in 2026. That is a very strong physical-reach achievement. Connection alone does not prove uninterrupted, affordable household energy or remove the continuing fuel and appliance costs families carry, so the score preserves a substantial gap between connection and money-free capability.

Indonesia’s Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources reported an electrification ratio of 99.83% in 2026. That is a very strong physical-reach achievement. Connection alone does not prove uninterrupted, affordable household energy or remove the continuing fuel and appliance costs families carry, so the score preserves a substantial gap between connection and money-free capability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.3× 15%= -8.8 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 15% = -8.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Indonesia’s Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources reported an electrification ratio of 99.83% in 2026. That is a very strong physical-reach achievement. Connection alone does not prove uninterrupted, affordable household energy or remove the continuing fuel and appliance costs families carry, so the score preserves a substantial gap between connection and money-free capability.

Indonesia’s Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources reported an electrification ratio of 99.83% in 2026. That is a very strong physical-reach achievement. Connection alone does not prove uninterrupted, affordable household energy or remove the continuing fuel and appliance costs families carry, so the score preserves a substantial gap between connection and money-free capability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.57 + -18.07 + -20.30 + -8.75 = -59.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +50.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +50.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -59.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+50.0 Original evidence category score+50.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 28.00 + -7.50 + 8.25 = 50.00

Base: 50.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +50.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 50.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.57 points

For Indonesia, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +5.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — energy-household-capability domestic evidence retained

Indonesia’s Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources reported an electrification ratio of 99.83% in 2026. That is a very strong physical-reach achievement. Connection alone does not prove uninterrupted, affordable household energy or remove the continuing fuel and appliance costs families carry, so the score preserves a substantial gap between connection and money-free capability.

2026-10-11 Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources — national electrification ratio
Indonesia: near-universal electricity connection creates strong capacity, while reliability and household energy burdens still matter

Indonesia’s Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources reported an electrification ratio of 99.83% in 2026. That is a very strong physical-reach achievement. Connection alone does not prove uninterrupted, affordable household energy or remove the continuing fuel and appliance costs families carry, so the score preserves a substantial gap between connection and money-free capability.

2026-10-05 Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources — national electrification ratio
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-65.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence +28.5

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-65.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-55.7× 25%= -13.9 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.7 × 25% = -13.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

WHO reports Indonesia’s UHC Service Coverage Index at 67 and says roughly 26.6% of the population still experiences financial hardship related to health spending. The system therefore has large public reach and institutional capacity, but care is not yet frictionless or financially safe for all households.

WHO reports Indonesia’s UHC Service Coverage Index at 67 and says roughly 26.6% of the population still experiences financial hardship related to health spending. The system therefore has large public reach and institutional capacity, but care is not yet frictionless or financially safe for all households.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.3× 35%= -20.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 0.75/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WHO reports Indonesia’s UHC Service Coverage Index at 67 and says roughly 26.6% of the population still experiences financial hardship related to health spending. The system therefore has large public reach and institutional capacity, but care is not yet frictionless or financially safe for all households.

WHO reports Indonesia’s UHC Service Coverage Index at 67 and says roughly 26.6% of the population still experiences financial hardship related to health spending. The system therefore has large public reach and institutional capacity, but care is not yet frictionless or financially safe for all households.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-87.9× 25%= -22.0 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.9 × 25% = -22.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WHO reports Indonesia’s UHC Service Coverage Index at 67 and says roughly 26.6% of the population still experiences financial hardship related to health spending. The system therefore has large public reach and institutional capacity, but care is not yet frictionless or financially safe for all households.

WHO reports Indonesia’s UHC Service Coverage Index at 67 and says roughly 26.6% of the population still experiences financial hardship related to health spending. The system therefore has large public reach and institutional capacity, but care is not yet frictionless or financially safe for all households.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-61.0× 15%= -9.2 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -61.0 × 15% = -9.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WHO reports Indonesia’s UHC Service Coverage Index at 67 and says roughly 26.6% of the population still experiences financial hardship related to health spending. The system therefore has large public reach and institutional capacity, but care is not yet frictionless or financially safe for all households.

WHO reports Indonesia’s UHC Service Coverage Index at 67 and says roughly 26.6% of the population still experiences financial hardship related to health spending. The system therefore has large public reach and institutional capacity, but care is not yet frictionless or financially safe for all households.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.91 + -20.42 + -21.98 + -9.16 = -65.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +28.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +28.5. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -65.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+28.5 Original evidence category score+28.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 16.25 + 19.25 + -13.75 + 6.75 = 28.50

Base: 28.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +28.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 28.50 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.05 points

For Indonesia, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — health-care-reach domestic evidence retained

WHO reports Indonesia’s UHC Service Coverage Index at 67 and says roughly 26.6% of the population still experiences financial hardship related to health spending. The system therefore has large public reach and institutional capacity, but care is not yet frictionless or financially safe for all households.

2026-10-11 WHO — Indonesia moves forward on universal health coverage
Indonesia: broad health coverage is real, but financial hardship still blocks full care reach

WHO reports Indonesia’s UHC Service Coverage Index at 67 and says roughly 26.6% of the population still experiences financial hardship related to health spending. The system therefore has large public reach and institutional capacity, but care is not yet frictionless or financially safe for all households.

2026-10-05 WHO — Indonesia moves forward on universal health coverage
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-63.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +37.3

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-63.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-53.0× 25%= -13.2 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -53.0 × 25% = -13.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Indonesia, bPS Statistics of Education 2025 documents the national household education picture and school resources for the 2024/2025 academic year. Formal education reaches most children, but participation, progression, learning quality and household costs remain uneven enough that education cannot yet be treated as universally frictionless human capability.

For Indonesia, bPS Statistics of Education 2025 documents the national household education picture and school resources for the 2024/2025 academic year. Formal education reaches most children, but participation, progression, learning quality and household costs remain uneven enough that education cannot yet be treated as universally frictionless human capability.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-57.0× 35%= -20.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -57.0 × 35% = -20.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, bPS Statistics of Education 2025 documents the national household education picture and school resources for the 2024/2025 academic year. Formal education reaches most children, but participation, progression, learning quality and household costs remain uneven enough that education cannot yet be treated as universally frictionless human capability.

For Indonesia, bPS Statistics of Education 2025 documents the national household education picture and school resources for the 2024/2025 academic year. Formal education reaches most children, but participation, progression, learning quality and household costs remain uneven enough that education cannot yet be treated as universally frictionless human capability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-83.9× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

-40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.00 weighted points

Original evidence -40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -40.0; Money-gated reading -83.9 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, bPS Statistics of Education 2025 documents the national household education picture and school resources for the 2024/2025 academic year. Formal education reaches most children, but participation, progression, learning quality and household costs remain uneven enough that education cannot yet be treated as universally frictionless human capability.

For Indonesia, bPS Statistics of Education 2025 documents the national household education picture and school resources for the 2024/2025 academic year. Formal education reaches most children, but participation, progression, learning quality and household costs remain uneven enough that education cannot yet be treated as universally frictionless human capability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-59.7× 15%= -9.0 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.7 × 15% = -9.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, bPS Statistics of Education 2025 documents the national household education picture and school resources for the 2024/2025 academic year. Formal education reaches most children, but participation, progression, learning quality and household costs remain uneven enough that education cannot yet be treated as universally frictionless human capability.

For Indonesia, bPS Statistics of Education 2025 documents the national household education picture and school resources for the 2024/2025 academic year. Formal education reaches most children, but participation, progression, learning quality and household costs remain uneven enough that education cannot yet be treated as universally frictionless human capability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.24 + -19.95 + -20.97 + -8.95 = -63.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +37.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +37.3. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+37.3 Original evidence category score+37.3 Contribution to national evidence score+2.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 21.00 + -10.00 + 7.50 = 37.25

Base: 37.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +37.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 37.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.30 points

For Indonesia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — education-human-capability domestic evidence retained

For Indonesia, bPS Statistics of Education 2025 documents the national household education picture and school resources for the 2024/2025 academic year. Formal education reaches most children, but participation, progression, learning quality and household costs remain uneven enough that education cannot yet be treated as universally frictionless human capability.

2026-10-11 BPS — Statistics of Education 2025
Indonesia: national education reach is broad, but capability and cost gaps remain

For Indonesia, bPS Statistics of Education 2025 documents the national household education picture and school resources for the 2024/2025 academic year. Formal education reaches most children, but participation, progression, learning quality and household costs remain uneven enough that education cannot yet be treated as universally frictionless human capability.

2026-10-05 BPS — Statistics of Education 2025
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-65.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +27.3

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-65.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-53.0× 25%= -13.2 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -53.0 × 25% = -13.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 counted about 11 million commuters, while the national transport system moves hundreds of millions of rail, road, sea and air passengers across an archipelago. Government PSO and occasional free-mudik programmes reduce some friction, but everyday movement still generally requires fares, vehicles, fuel and substantial travel time.

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 counted about 11 million commuters, while the national transport system moves hundreds of millions of rail, road, sea and air passengers across an archipelago. Government PSO and occasional free-mudik programmes reduce some friction, but everyday movement still generally requires fares, vehicles, fuel and substantial travel time.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-59.7× 35%= -20.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.7 × 35% = -20.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 counted about 11 million commuters, while the national transport system moves hundreds of millions of rail, road, sea and air passengers across an archipelago. Government PSO and occasional free-mudik programmes reduce some friction, but everyday movement still generally requires fares, vehicles, fuel and substantial travel time.

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 counted about 11 million commuters, while the national transport system moves hundreds of millions of rail, road, sea and air passengers across an archipelago. Government PSO and occasional free-mudik programmes reduce some friction, but everyday movement still generally requires fares, vehicles, fuel and substantial travel time.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-89.3× 25%= -22.3 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -89.3 × 25% = -22.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 counted about 11 million commuters, while the national transport system moves hundreds of millions of rail, road, sea and air passengers across an archipelago. Government PSO and occasional free-mudik programmes reduce some friction, but everyday movement still generally requires fares, vehicles, fuel and substantial travel time.

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 counted about 11 million commuters, while the national transport system moves hundreds of millions of rail, road, sea and air passengers across an archipelago. Government PSO and occasional free-mudik programmes reduce some friction, but everyday movement still generally requires fares, vehicles, fuel and substantial travel time.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-62.4× 15%= -9.4 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -62.4 × 15% = -9.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 counted about 11 million commuters, while the national transport system moves hundreds of millions of rail, road, sea and air passengers across an archipelago. Government PSO and occasional free-mudik programmes reduce some friction, but everyday movement still generally requires fares, vehicles, fuel and substantial travel time.

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 counted about 11 million commuters, while the national transport system moves hundreds of millions of rail, road, sea and air passengers across an archipelago. Government PSO and occasional free-mudik programmes reduce some friction, but everyday movement still generally requires fares, vehicles, fuel and substantial travel time.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.24 + -20.89 + -22.31 + -9.36 = -65.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +27.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +27.3. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -65.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+27.3 Original evidence category score+27.3 Contribution to national evidence score+1.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 6.00 = 27.25

Base: 27.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 27.25 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.12 points

For Indonesia, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — mobility-reachability domestic evidence retained

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 counted about 11 million commuters, while the national transport system moves hundreds of millions of rail, road, sea and air passengers across an archipelago. Government PSO and occasional free-mudik programmes reduce some friction, but everyday movement still generally requires fares, vehicles, fuel and substantial travel time.

2026-10-11 BPS — SUPAS 2025 mobility indicators · Ministry of Transportation — connectivity and public-service transport
Indonesia: enormous multi-island transport capacity still consumes household time and money

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 counted about 11 million commuters, while the national transport system moves hundreds of millions of rail, road, sea and air passengers across an archipelago. Government PSO and occasional free-mudik programmes reduce some friction, but everyday movement still generally requires fares, vehicles, fuel and substantial travel time.

2026-10-05 BPS — SUPAS 2025 mobility indicators · Ministry of Transportation — connectivity and public-service transport
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-63.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence +36.3

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-63.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-54.3× 25%= -13.6 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -54.3 × 25% = -13.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 measured total fertility at 2.13 children per woman, infant mortality at 14.12 per 1,000 births and the age-60-plus population at 11.97%. Family continuity remains stronger than in many ageing economies, while the large MBG programme reduces one child-rearing burden. Housing, transport, care and most household needs nevertheless still require family cash income.

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 measured total fertility at 2.13 children per woman, infant mortality at 14.12 per 1,000 births and the age-60-plus population at 11.97%. Family continuity remains stronger than in many ageing economies, while the large MBG programme reduces one child-rearing burden. Housing, transport, care and most household needs nevertheless still require family cash income.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-57.0× 35%= -20.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -57.0 × 35% = -20.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 measured total fertility at 2.13 children per woman, infant mortality at 14.12 per 1,000 births and the age-60-plus population at 11.97%. Family continuity remains stronger than in many ageing economies, while the large MBG programme reduces one child-rearing burden. Housing, transport, care and most household needs nevertheless still require family cash income.

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 measured total fertility at 2.13 children per woman, infant mortality at 14.12 per 1,000 births and the age-60-plus population at 11.97%. Family continuity remains stronger than in many ageing economies, while the large MBG programme reduces one child-rearing burden. Housing, transport, care and most household needs nevertheless still require family cash income.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-85.2× 25%= -21.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -85.2 × 25% = -21.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 measured total fertility at 2.13 children per woman, infant mortality at 14.12 per 1,000 births and the age-60-plus population at 11.97%. Family continuity remains stronger than in many ageing economies, while the large MBG programme reduces one child-rearing burden. Housing, transport, care and most household needs nevertheless still require family cash income.

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 measured total fertility at 2.13 children per woman, infant mortality at 14.12 per 1,000 births and the age-60-plus population at 11.97%. Family continuity remains stronger than in many ageing economies, while the large MBG programme reduces one child-rearing burden. Housing, transport, care and most household needs nevertheless still require family cash income.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-57.0× 15%= -8.6 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -57.0 × 15% = -8.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 measured total fertility at 2.13 children per woman, infant mortality at 14.12 per 1,000 births and the age-60-plus population at 11.97%. Family continuity remains stronger than in many ageing economies, while the large MBG programme reduces one child-rearing burden. Housing, transport, care and most household needs nevertheless still require family cash income.

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 measured total fertility at 2.13 children per woman, infant mortality at 14.12 per 1,000 births and the age-60-plus population at 11.97%. Family continuity remains stronger than in many ageing economies, while the large MBG programme reduces one child-rearing burden. Housing, transport, care and most household needs nevertheless still require family cash income.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.58 + -19.95 + -21.30 + -8.55 = -63.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +36.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +36.3. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+36.3 Original evidence category score+36.3 Contribution to national evidence score+3.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 17.50 + 21.00 + -11.25 + 9.00 = 36.25

Base: 36.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +36.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 36.25 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.99 points

For Indonesia, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +36.3

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: +36.3 − 0 = +36.3 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974 Art. 1 defines marriage between a man and a woman. This is a legal-status finding, not a measured effect on fertility.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 1974-01-02 · Reviewed: 2026-10-09

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — family-formation-stability domestic evidence retained

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 measured total fertility at 2.13 children per woman, infant mortality at 14.12 per 1,000 births and the age-60-plus population at 11.97%. Family continuity remains stronger than in many ageing economies, while the large MBG programme reduces one child-rearing burden. Housing, transport, care and most household needs nevertheless still require family cash income.

2026-10-11 BPS — SUPAS 2025 fertility, mortality and ageing
Indonesia: replacement-level fertility and a still-young population preserve family continuity, but raising children remains economically gated

For Indonesia, sUPAS 2025 measured total fertility at 2.13 children per woman, infant mortality at 14.12 per 1,000 births and the age-60-plus population at 11.97%. Family continuity remains stronger than in many ageing economies, while the large MBG programme reduces one child-rearing burden. Housing, transport, care and most household needs nevertheless still require family cash income.

2026-10-05 BPS — SUPAS 2025 fertility, mortality and ageing
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-66.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +23.8

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-66.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-51.6× 25%= -12.9 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -51.6 × 25% = -12.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Indonesia has enormous physical land capacity, but 55.65% of the population is concentrated on Java and only 68.40% of households met the national adequate-housing measure in 2025. Physical land therefore coexists with concentrated opportunity, housing constraints and a large gap between national territory and ordinary household access to useful space.

Indonesia has enormous physical land capacity, but 55.65% of the population is concentrated on Java and only 68.40% of households met the national adequate-housing measure in 2025. Physical land therefore coexists with concentrated opportunity, housing constraints and a large gap between national territory and ordinary household access to useful space.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-62.4× 35%= -21.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

40.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -62.4 × 35% = -21.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Indonesia has enormous physical land capacity, but 55.65% of the population is concentrated on Java and only 68.40% of households met the national adequate-housing measure in 2025. Physical land therefore coexists with concentrated opportunity, housing constraints and a large gap between national territory and ordinary household access to useful space.

Indonesia has enormous physical land capacity, but 55.65% of the population is concentrated on Java and only 68.40% of households met the national adequate-housing measure in 2025. Physical land therefore coexists with concentrated opportunity, housing constraints and a large gap between national territory and ordinary household access to useful space.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-90.6× 25%= -22.7 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -90.6 × 25% = -22.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Indonesia has enormous physical land capacity, but 55.65% of the population is concentrated on Java and only 68.40% of households met the national adequate-housing measure in 2025. Physical land therefore coexists with concentrated opportunity, housing constraints and a large gap between national territory and ordinary household access to useful space.

Indonesia has enormous physical land capacity, but 55.65% of the population is concentrated on Java and only 68.40% of households met the national adequate-housing measure in 2025. Physical land therefore coexists with concentrated opportunity, housing constraints and a large gap between national territory and ordinary household access to useful space.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-62.4× 15%= -9.4 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -62.4 × 15% = -9.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Indonesia has enormous physical land capacity, but 55.65% of the population is concentrated on Java and only 68.40% of households met the national adequate-housing measure in 2025. Physical land therefore coexists with concentrated opportunity, housing constraints and a large gap between national territory and ordinary household access to useful space.

Indonesia has enormous physical land capacity, but 55.65% of the population is concentrated on Java and only 68.40% of households met the national adequate-housing measure in 2025. Physical land therefore coexists with concentrated opportunity, housing constraints and a large gap between national territory and ordinary household access to useful space.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.91 + -21.83 + -22.65 + -9.35 = -66.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +23.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +23.8. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -66.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+23.8 Original evidence category score+23.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 14.00 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 23.75

Base: 23.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +23.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 23.75 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.22 points

For Indonesia, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +40.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — land-spatial-freedom domestic evidence retained

Indonesia has enormous physical land capacity, but 55.65% of the population is concentrated on Java and only 68.40% of households met the national adequate-housing measure in 2025. Physical land therefore coexists with concentrated opportunity, housing constraints and a large gap between national territory and ordinary household access to useful space.

2026-10-11 BPS — SUPAS 2025 population distribution · BPS — Adequate housing, 2025
Indonesia: vast territory does not automatically become ordinary household spatial freedom

Indonesia has enormous physical land capacity, but 55.65% of the population is concentrated on Java and only 68.40% of households met the national adequate-housing measure in 2025. Physical land therefore coexists with concentrated opportunity, housing constraints and a large gap between national territory and ordinary household access to useful space.

2026-10-05 BPS — SUPAS 2025 population distribution · BPS — Adequate housing, 2025
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-65.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +29.5

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-65.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-53.0× 25%= -13.2 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -53.0 × 25% = -13.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

BPS measured a national Happiness Index of 71.49 in 2021, with households of five or more at 72.05. Indonesia also has exceptional natural, cultural and community-life capacity. The latest national happiness measure is older, however, and ordinary recreation, travel, entertainment and much cultural consumption still commonly require payment, so the score gives capacity credit without treating delight as freely reachable.

BPS measured a national Happiness Index of 71.49 in 2021, with households of five or more at 72.05. Indonesia also has exceptional natural, cultural and community-life capacity. The latest national happiness measure is older, however, and ordinary recreation, travel, entertainment and much cultural consumption still commonly require payment, so the score gives capacity credit without treating delight as freely reachable.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-61.0× 35%= -21.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -61.0 × 35% = -21.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

BPS measured a national Happiness Index of 71.49 in 2021, with households of five or more at 72.05. Indonesia also has exceptional natural, cultural and community-life capacity. The latest national happiness measure is older, however, and ordinary recreation, travel, entertainment and much cultural consumption still commonly require payment, so the score gives capacity credit without treating delight as freely reachable.

BPS measured a national Happiness Index of 71.49 in 2021, with households of five or more at 72.05. Indonesia also has exceptional natural, cultural and community-life capacity. The latest national happiness measure is older, however, and ordinary recreation, travel, entertainment and much cultural consumption still commonly require payment, so the score gives capacity credit without treating delight as freely reachable.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-86.6× 25%= -21.6 points
Exact point calculation

-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points

Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.0; Money-gated reading -86.6 × 25% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

BPS measured a national Happiness Index of 71.49 in 2021, with households of five or more at 72.05. Indonesia also has exceptional natural, cultural and community-life capacity. The latest national happiness measure is older, however, and ordinary recreation, travel, entertainment and much cultural consumption still commonly require payment, so the score gives capacity credit without treating delight as freely reachable.

BPS measured a national Happiness Index of 71.49 in 2021, with households of five or more at 72.05. Indonesia also has exceptional natural, cultural and community-life capacity. The latest national happiness measure is older, however, and ordinary recreation, travel, entertainment and much cultural consumption still commonly require payment, so the score gives capacity credit without treating delight as freely reachable.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-59.7× 15%= -9.0 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.7 × 15% = -9.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

BPS measured a national Happiness Index of 71.49 in 2021, with households of five or more at 72.05. Indonesia also has exceptional natural, cultural and community-life capacity. The latest national happiness measure is older, however, and ordinary recreation, travel, entertainment and much cultural consumption still commonly require payment, so the score gives capacity credit without treating delight as freely reachable.

BPS measured a national Happiness Index of 71.49 in 2021, with households of five or more at 72.05. Indonesia also has exceptional natural, cultural and community-life capacity. The latest national happiness measure is older, however, and ordinary recreation, travel, entertainment and much cultural consumption still commonly require payment, so the score gives capacity credit without treating delight as freely reachable.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.24 + -21.36 + -21.64 + -8.96 = -65.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +29.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +29.5. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -65.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+29.5 Original evidence category score+29.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 15.75 + -12.50 + 7.50 = 29.50

Base: 29.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +29.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 29.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.82 points

For Indonesia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +30.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — peace-beauty-delight domestic evidence retained

BPS measured a national Happiness Index of 71.49 in 2021, with households of five or more at 72.05. Indonesia also has exceptional natural, cultural and community-life capacity. The latest national happiness measure is older, however, and ordinary recreation, travel, entertainment and much cultural consumption still commonly require payment, so the score gives capacity credit without treating delight as freely reachable.

2026-10-11 BPS — Happiness Index 2021
Indonesia: immense cultural and natural delight exists, but everyday access is uneven and usually remains monetized

BPS measured a national Happiness Index of 71.49 in 2021, with households of five or more at 72.05. Indonesia also has exceptional natural, cultural and community-life capacity. The latest national happiness measure is older, however, and ordinary recreation, travel, entertainment and much cultural consumption still commonly require payment, so the score gives capacity credit without treating delight as freely reachable.

2026-10-05 BPS — Happiness Index 2021
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-64.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +33.8

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-64.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-48.9× 25%= -12.2 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -48.9 × 25% = -12.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

The Ministry of Forestry reports 95.5 million hectares of forest cover in 2024, equal to 51.1% of Indonesia’s land area. Net deforestation was 175,400 hectares, while forest and land rehabilitation covered 217,900 hectares. Indonesia therefore retains extraordinary ecological capacity while still losing living ground and carrying major restoration work.

The Ministry of Forestry reports 95.5 million hectares of forest cover in 2024, equal to 51.1% of Indonesia’s land area. Net deforestation was 175,400 hectares, while forest and land rehabilitation covered 217,900 hectares. Indonesia therefore retains extraordinary ecological capacity while still losing living ground and carrying major restoration work.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-58.3× 35%= -20.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The Ministry of Forestry reports 95.5 million hectares of forest cover in 2024, equal to 51.1% of Indonesia’s land area. Net deforestation was 175,400 hectares, while forest and land rehabilitation covered 217,900 hectares. Indonesia therefore retains extraordinary ecological capacity while still losing living ground and carrying major restoration work.

The Ministry of Forestry reports 95.5 million hectares of forest cover in 2024, equal to 51.1% of Indonesia’s land area. Net deforestation was 175,400 hectares, while forest and land rehabilitation covered 217,900 hectares. Indonesia therefore retains extraordinary ecological capacity while still losing living ground and carrying major restoration work.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-90.6× 25%= -22.7 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -90.6 × 25% = -22.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The Ministry of Forestry reports 95.5 million hectares of forest cover in 2024, equal to 51.1% of Indonesia’s land area. Net deforestation was 175,400 hectares, while forest and land rehabilitation covered 217,900 hectares. Indonesia therefore retains extraordinary ecological capacity while still losing living ground and carrying major restoration work.

The Ministry of Forestry reports 95.5 million hectares of forest cover in 2024, equal to 51.1% of Indonesia’s land area. Net deforestation was 175,400 hectares, while forest and land rehabilitation covered 217,900 hectares. Indonesia therefore retains extraordinary ecological capacity while still losing living ground and carrying major restoration work.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-58.3× 15%= -8.8 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 15% = -8.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The Ministry of Forestry reports 95.5 million hectares of forest cover in 2024, equal to 51.1% of Indonesia’s land area. Net deforestation was 175,400 hectares, while forest and land rehabilitation covered 217,900 hectares. Indonesia therefore retains extraordinary ecological capacity while still losing living ground and carrying major restoration work.

The Ministry of Forestry reports 95.5 million hectares of forest cover in 2024, equal to 51.1% of Indonesia’s land area. Net deforestation was 175,400 hectares, while forest and land rehabilitation covered 217,900 hectares. Indonesia therefore retains extraordinary ecological capacity while still losing living ground and carrying major restoration work.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.23 + -20.42 + -22.65 + -8.75 = -64.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +33.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +33.8. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+33.8 Original evidence category score+33.8 Contribution to national evidence score+2.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 19.25 + -16.25 + 8.25 = 33.75

Base: 33.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +33.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 33.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.09 points

For Indonesia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +35.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — living-ground-resilience domestic evidence retained

The Ministry of Forestry reports 95.5 million hectares of forest cover in 2024, equal to 51.1% of Indonesia’s land area. Net deforestation was 175,400 hectares, while forest and land rehabilitation covered 217,900 hectares. Indonesia therefore retains extraordinary ecological capacity while still losing living ground and carrying major restoration work.

2026-10-11 Ministry of Forestry — Indonesia deforestation 2024
Indonesia: vast forest capacity coexists with renewed deforestation pressure

The Ministry of Forestry reports 95.5 million hectares of forest cover in 2024, equal to 51.1% of Indonesia’s land area. Net deforestation was 175,400 hectares, while forest and land rehabilitation covered 217,900 hectares. Indonesia therefore retains extraordinary ecological capacity while still losing living ground and carrying major restoration work.

2026-10-05 Ministry of Forestry — Indonesia deforestation 2024
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-67.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence +21.0

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-67.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-58.3× 25%= -14.6 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 25% = -14.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks Indonesia 69th of 143 overall. Its Civil Justice rank was 93rd and Criminal Justice 94th, while Fundamental Rights ranked 93rd. The result indicates meaningful institutional capacity but substantial practical justice, rights and reliability friction.

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks Indonesia 69th of 143 overall. Its Civil Justice rank was 93rd and Criminal Justice 94th, while Fundamental Rights ranked 93rd. The result indicates meaningful institutional capacity but substantial practical justice, rights and reliability friction.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-61.0× 35%= -21.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -61.0 × 35% = -21.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks Indonesia 69th of 143 overall. Its Civil Justice rank was 93rd and Criminal Justice 94th, while Fundamental Rights ranked 93rd. The result indicates meaningful institutional capacity but substantial practical justice, rights and reliability friction.

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks Indonesia 69th of 143 overall. Its Civil Justice rank was 93rd and Criminal Justice 94th, while Fundamental Rights ranked 93rd. The result indicates meaningful institutional capacity but substantial practical justice, rights and reliability friction.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-87.9× 25%= -22.0 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.9 × 25% = -22.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks Indonesia 69th of 143 overall. Its Civil Justice rank was 93rd and Criminal Justice 94th, while Fundamental Rights ranked 93rd. The result indicates meaningful institutional capacity but substantial practical justice, rights and reliability friction.

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks Indonesia 69th of 143 overall. Its Civil Justice rank was 93rd and Criminal Justice 94th, while Fundamental Rights ranked 93rd. The result indicates meaningful institutional capacity but substantial practical justice, rights and reliability friction.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-63.7× 15%= -9.6 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.7 × 15% = -9.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks Indonesia 69th of 143 overall. Its Civil Justice rank was 93rd and Criminal Justice 94th, while Fundamental Rights ranked 93rd. The result indicates meaningful institutional capacity but substantial practical justice, rights and reliability friction.

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks Indonesia 69th of 143 overall. Its Civil Justice rank was 93rd and Criminal Justice 94th, while Fundamental Rights ranked 93rd. The result indicates meaningful institutional capacity but substantial practical justice, rights and reliability friction.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.59 + -21.36 + -21.98 + -9.55 = -67.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +21.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +21.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -67.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+21.0 Original evidence category score+21.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 15.75 + -13.75 + 5.25 = 21.00

Base: 21.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +21.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 21.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.08 points

For Indonesia, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — justice-safety-friction domestic evidence retained

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks Indonesia 69th of 143 overall. Its Civil Justice rank was 93rd and Criminal Justice 94th, while Fundamental Rights ranked 93rd. The result indicates meaningful institutional capacity but substantial practical justice, rights and reliability friction.

2026-10-11 World Justice Project — Indonesia 2025 Rule of Law Index
Indonesia: functioning institutions coexist with weak civil and criminal justice reach

The 2025 World Justice Project Rule of Law Index ranks Indonesia 69th of 143 overall. Its Civil Justice rank was 93rd and Criminal Justice 94th, while Fundamental Rights ranked 93rd. The result indicates meaningful institutional capacity but substantial practical justice, rights and reliability friction.

2026-10-05 World Justice Project — Indonesia 2025 Rule of Law Index
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-70.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +9.3

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-70.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.3× 25%= -14.6 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 25% = -14.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Indonesia’s Environment Ministry reported that by the end of 2025 only about 25% of national waste was managed, around 36,684 tonnes per day, while roughly 75% or 105,483 tonnes per day remained inadequately handled. That is a severe material-return failure despite growing national waste-management infrastructure and policy attention.

Indonesia’s Environment Ministry reported that by the end of 2025 only about 25% of national waste was managed, around 36,684 tonnes per day, while roughly 75% or 105,483 tonnes per day remained inadequately handled. That is a severe material-return failure despite growing national waste-management infrastructure and policy attention.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-65.1× 35%= -22.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

30.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -65.1 × 35% = -22.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Indonesia’s Environment Ministry reported that by the end of 2025 only about 25% of national waste was managed, around 36,684 tonnes per day, while roughly 75% or 105,483 tonnes per day remained inadequately handled. That is a severe material-return failure despite growing national waste-management infrastructure and policy attention.

Indonesia’s Environment Ministry reported that by the end of 2025 only about 25% of national waste was managed, around 36,684 tonnes per day, while roughly 75% or 105,483 tonnes per day remained inadequately handled. That is a severe material-return failure despite growing national waste-management infrastructure and policy attention.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-93.3× 25%= -23.3 points
Exact point calculation

-75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -18.75 weighted points

Original evidence -75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -75.0; Money-gated reading -93.3 × 25% = -23.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Indonesia’s Environment Ministry reported that by the end of 2025 only about 25% of national waste was managed, around 36,684 tonnes per day, while roughly 75% or 105,483 tonnes per day remained inadequately handled. That is a severe material-return failure despite growing national waste-management infrastructure and policy attention.

Indonesia’s Environment Ministry reported that by the end of 2025 only about 25% of national waste was managed, around 36,684 tonnes per day, while roughly 75% or 105,483 tonnes per day remained inadequately handled. That is a severe material-return failure despite growing national waste-management infrastructure and policy attention.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-66.4× 15%= -10.0 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -66.4 × 15% = -10.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Indonesia’s Environment Ministry reported that by the end of 2025 only about 25% of national waste was managed, around 36,684 tonnes per day, while roughly 75% or 105,483 tonnes per day remained inadequately handled. That is a severe material-return failure despite growing national waste-management infrastructure and policy attention.

Indonesia’s Environment Ministry reported that by the end of 2025 only about 25% of national waste was managed, around 36,684 tonnes per day, while roughly 75% or 105,483 tonnes per day remained inadequately handled. That is a severe material-return failure despite growing national waste-management infrastructure and policy attention.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.59 + -22.77 + -23.32 + -9.96 = -70.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +9.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +9.3. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -70.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+9.3 Original evidence category score+9.3 Contribution to national evidence score+0.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 10.50 + -18.75 + 3.75 = 9.25

Base: 9.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +9.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 9.25 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 0.38 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

For Indonesia, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — durability-material-return domestic evidence retained

Indonesia’s Environment Ministry reported that by the end of 2025 only about 25% of national waste was managed, around 36,684 tonnes per day, while roughly 75% or 105,483 tonnes per day remained inadequately handled. That is a severe material-return failure despite growing national waste-management infrastructure and policy attention.

2026-10-11 Ministry of Environment — National Waste Management Coordination 2026
Indonesia: most municipal waste still fails to return into a managed material cycle

Indonesia’s Environment Ministry reported that by the end of 2025 only about 25% of national waste was managed, around 36,684 tonnes per day, while roughly 75% or 105,483 tonnes per day remained inadequately handled. That is a severe material-return failure despite growing national waste-management infrastructure and policy attention.

2026-10-05 Ministry of Environment — National Waste Management Coordination 2026
6% weight International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
-72.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence +2.3

International score breakdown

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

-72.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Entry Accessibility 25%
See all nine International Welcome Entry Accessibility scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-60.2× 25%= -15.1 points
Exact point calculation

48.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 12.00 weighted points

Original evidence +48.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +48.0; Money-gated reading -60.2 × 25% = -15.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Indonesia provides visa on arrival and electronic visitor procedures to eligible nationalities; fees and conditions apply.

UNHCR reports about 11,900 registered refugees in Indonesia by September 2025. Indonesia is not party to the 1951 Refugee Convention or 1967 Protocol and does not operate a national refugee-status determination system, so UNHCR conducts RSD. This policy category is factual and unscored.

🤔
Migrant Practical Life 30%
See all nine International Welcome Migrant Practical Life scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-79.0× 30%= -23.7 points
Exact point calculation

-22.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = -6.60 weighted points

Original evidence -22.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -22.0; Money-gated reading -79.0 × 30% = -23.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

UNHCR records refugees and asylum seekers in Indonesia but indicates limited national settlement pathways and no national refugee-status determination system.

🤔
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome 25%
See all nine International Welcome Refugee / Neighbour Welcome scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-70.4× 25%= -17.6 points
Exact point calculation

10.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 2.50 weighted points

Original evidence +10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +10.0; Money-gated reading -70.4 × 25% = -17.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Regulation 125/2016 allows coordination with UNHCR for foreign refugees; Indonesia has not joined the 1951 Refugee Convention.

🤔
Flexibility / Continuity 20%
See all nine International Welcome Flexibility / Continuity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.7× 20%= -16.1 points
Exact point calculation

-28.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = -5.60 weighted points

Original evidence -28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -28.0; Money-gated reading -80.7 × 20% = -16.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

The long waiting period for third-country solutions and limited durable integration restrict refugee family continuity in Indonesia.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -15.06 + -23.71 + -17.61 + -16.13 = -72.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +2.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +2.3. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -72.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+2.3 Original evidence category score+2.3 Contribution to national evidence score+0.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 12.00 + -6.60 + 2.50 + -5.60 = 2.30

Base: 2.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +2.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 2.30 × (6.00 × 76.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 0.11 points

For Indonesia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 76% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.56%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — Flexibility / Continuity (international-access-human-welcome)

The long waiting period for third-country solutions and limited durable integration restrict refugee family continuity in Indonesia.

2026-10-11 UNHCR Indonesia country information
2026 full review — Indonesia — Refugee / Neighbour Welcome (international-access-human-welcome)

Regulation 125/2016 allows coordination with UNHCR for foreign refugees; Indonesia has not joined the 1951 Refugee Convention.

2026-10-11 UNHCR Indonesia registration and RSD
2026 full review — Indonesia — Migrant Practical Life (international-access-human-welcome)

UNHCR records refugees and asylum seekers in Indonesia but indicates limited national settlement pathways and no national refugee-status determination system.

2026-10-11 UNHCR Indonesia country operation
2026 full review — Indonesia — Entry Accessibility (international-access-human-welcome)

Indonesia provides visa on arrival and electronic visitor procedures to eligible nationalities; fees and conditions apply.

2026-10-11 Indonesian Directorate General of Immigration
Indonesia: refugees receive protection through UNHCR, but the international-access framework remains restrictive and incomplete

UNHCR reports about 11,900 registered refugees in Indonesia by September 2025. Indonesia is not party to the 1951 Refugee Convention or 1967 Protocol and does not operate a national refugee-status determination system, so UNHCR conducts RSD. This policy category is factual and unscored.

2026-10-05 UNHCR — UNHCR in Indonesia
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-65.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +27.0

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-65.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Positive Contribution 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-61.8× 25%= -15.5 points
Exact point calculation

42.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +42.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +42.0; Money-gated reading -61.8 × 25% = -15.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Indonesia and IFAD ran a 2025 South-South programme for youth agricultural enterprise with invited partner-country participants.

BPS reports Indonesia’s 2025 non-oil export surplus was strongly supported by vegetable oils, mineral fuels, iron and steel and nickel products. IEA identifies Indonesia as the world’s largest coal exporter. These exports provide major global energy, food and industrial inputs while also carrying climate, mining, forest and supply-chain impacts that require fuller external-footprint review. This policy category remains factual and unscored.

🤔
Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-58.3× 25%= -14.6 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 25% = -14.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Indonesia, the IFAD training included participants from India, Gambia, Kenya, Papua New Guinea and Rwanda; this demonstrates cooperation, not national outcomes.

🤔
Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-73.1× 35%= -25.6 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -73.1 × 35% = -25.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Indonesia, a training cohort establishes knowledge transfer but does not establish net environmental or financial effects of all overseas engagement.

🤔
Accountability / Repair 15%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-68.3× 15%= -10.2 points
Exact point calculation

18.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.70 weighted points

Original evidence +18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +18.0; Money-gated reading -68.3 × 15% = -10.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Indonesia, the government publishes event details, while independent tracking of post-training community benefit and redress is incomplete.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -15.46 + -14.59 + -25.59 + -10.24 = -65.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +27.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +27.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -65.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+27.0 Original evidence category score+27.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 10.50 + 13.75 + 0.00 + 2.70 = 26.95

Base: 26.95 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 26.95 × (6.00 × 76.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.27 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Exported waste / garbageAudit pending
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

For Indonesia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 76% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.56%. After normalization across Indonesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Indonesia — Accountability / Repair (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For Indonesia, the government publishes event details, while independent tracking of post-training community benefit and redress is incomplete.

2026-10-11 Indonesian State Secretariat
2026 full review — Indonesia — Documented Harm / Extraction (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For Indonesia, a training cohort establishes knowledge transfer but does not establish net environmental or financial effects of all overseas engagement.

2026-10-11 Indonesia / IFAD programme
2026 full review — Indonesia — Mutuality / Local Benefit (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For Indonesia, the IFAD training included participants from India, Gambia, Kenya, Papua New Guinea and Rwanda; this demonstrates cooperation, not national outcomes.

2026-10-11 Indonesian State Secretariat 2025
2026 full review — Indonesia — Positive Contribution (external-footprint-non-extractive)

Indonesia and IFAD ran a 2025 South-South programme for youth agricultural enterprise with invited partner-country participants.

2026-10-11 Indonesian State Secretariat / IFAD
Indonesia: global commodity contribution is large, with coal, palm oil and nickel carrying material external footprints

BPS reports Indonesia’s 2025 non-oil export surplus was strongly supported by vegetable oils, mineral fuels, iron and steel and nickel products. IEA identifies Indonesia as the world’s largest coal exporter. These exports provide major global energy, food and industrial inputs while also carrying climate, mining, forest and supply-chain impacts that require fuller external-footprint review. This policy category remains factual and unscored.

2026-10-05 BPS — Indonesia trade balance and major export commodities, 2025 · IEA — Coal 2025: trade

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.