Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Lesotho 🇱🇸

Lesotho currently ranks #173 of 241 on the TBF Abundance Scorecard, scoring -68.54. This country is with a pending direct Money Gate review, strongest in Land and weakest in Repair among 14 scored of 16 evidence categories.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Data updatedEvidence through 26 May 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-68.5
Evidence before Abundance Gate +16.7
How the headline score is calculated

Evidence before Gate = Σ (published category score × category weight × research coverage) ÷ Σ (category weight × research coverage). The five-part Money Gate sets a proportional ceiling, with Friction already in the category evidence score.

Current evidence: +16.7 · Money Gate: 1.56/20 · Cash-register lock: +92.2 · Graded pressure: +92.2 · Headline: -68.5.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#173of 241

Global standing based on life reachability

LesothoLast recorded move: down from #171 to #173.Recent recorded movements
  1. #171 → #17312 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500
  2. #170 → #17312 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500
  3. #169 → #17312 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500
  4. #168 → #17112 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

National Abundance Gate

Money-gated

Graded status · five basics not fully cleared

Research Coverage

88%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% = 88.00% weighted coverage

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored; 2 / 2 international categories with documented research (scores require full audit)

GDP Rank

#168

Shown for context, not as the abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

The five-part direct reading is still pending. Missing gate readings remain pending rather than being converted into invented free-access points.

Reach-to-Money-Gate Clearance 2.0: These five gates measure effective no-payment access, not installed capacity alone. Under new source-backed reviews, 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 points track verified free access to 0%, some but less than 30%, 30%+, 50%+, 75%+ and 100% of the population respectively. The higher levels require reliable real use; 4/4 requires universally accessible, reliable service without ordinary charges or exclusions. Missing population figures remain pending. Older gate points remain archived until re-audited.

— Pending

Food

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Housing / Land

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Healthcare

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Transportation

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

— Pending

Water / Energy

Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned

Money Gate · Direct audit pending
  • FoodPending
  • Housing / LandPending
  • HealthcarePending
  • TransportationPending
  • Water / EnergyPending
  • Money still neededNot measured

The existing transitional gate estimate is not split into invented category scores. Five direct category audits are still needed.

Why this reading is pending

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

No category-level 0–4 point calculation is available until a direct Money Gate audit is completed.

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Cash-Register Lock
92.2 / 100
Why 92.2 / 100?

The five direct Money Gate readings total 0–20. Every point removes five of the 100 payment-lock units; a 7/20 reading produces a 65/100 lock.

Actual calculation

100 - (1.56 × 5) = 92.20

Friction Economy Pressure
83.9 / 100
Why 83.9 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -67.83) ÷ 2 = 83.92 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-46.1
Why -46.1?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

92.20 = 92.20 (Friction already counted in category scores)

-50 + 2.5 × 1.56 = -46.1

The transitional value is derived from published domestic Reach and Friction rails only to preserve historical ordering. It is not a substitute for the five direct 0–4 gate findings above and can never clear the Money Gate.

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale once verified. International Welcome and External Footprint remain pending until their rail scores are properly researched. Select a category for sourced findings and transparent calculations.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
+13.8↓

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

+13.8
Capacity 25%
+55.0× 25%= +13.8 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

No sufficiently reliable current primary national average-hours measure was secured. High rural poverty, unemployment/underemployment and livelihood vulnerability mean time abundance cannot be inferred from GDP or employment alone.

Reach 35%
+35.0× 35%= +12.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

No sufficiently reliable current primary national average-hours measure was secured. High rural poverty, unemployment/underemployment and livelihood vulnerability mean time abundance cannot be inferred from GDP or employment alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-70.0× 25%= -17.5 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

No sufficiently reliable current primary national average-hours measure was secured. High rural poverty, unemployment/underemployment and livelihood vulnerability mean time abundance cannot be inferred from GDP or employment alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Regeneration 15%
+35.0× 15%= +5.3 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

No sufficiently reliable current primary national average-hours measure was secured. High rural poverty, unemployment/underemployment and livelihood vulnerability mean time abundance cannot be inferred from GDP or employment alone.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+13.8 Published category score+13.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 12.25 + -17.50 + 5.25 = 13.75

Base: 13.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +13.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 13.75 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.41 points

This category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Lesotho: Human Time & Burden Return research finding

No sufficiently reliable current primary national average-hours measure was secured. High rural poverty, unemployment/underemployment and livelihood vulnerability mean time abundance cannot be inferred from GDP or employment alone.

World Bank — Lesotho country overview
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
+13.8↓

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

+13.8
Capacity 25%
+55.0× 25%= +13.8 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

No sufficiently current national housing-adequacy, overcrowding, tenure and affordability dataset was secured. Mountain geography and rural poverty materially affect serviceable housing, so live review should treat this as an evidence gap.

Reach 35%
+35.0× 35%= +12.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land direct audit pending. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

No sufficiently current national housing-adequacy, overcrowding, tenure and affordability dataset was secured. Mountain geography and rural poverty materially affect serviceable housing, so live review should treat this as an evidence gap.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-70.0× 25%= -17.5 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

No sufficiently current national housing-adequacy, overcrowding, tenure and affordability dataset was secured. Mountain geography and rural poverty materially affect serviceable housing, so live review should treat this as an evidence gap.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Durability 15%
+35.0× 15%= +5.3 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

No sufficiently current national housing-adequacy, overcrowding, tenure and affordability dataset was secured. Mountain geography and rural poverty materially affect serviceable housing, so live review should treat this as an evidence gap.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+13.8 Published category score+13.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 12.25 + -17.50 + 5.25 = 13.75

Base: 13.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +13.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 13.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.25 points

This category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Lesotho: Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach research finding

No sufficiently current national housing-adequacy, overcrowding, tenure and affordability dataset was secured. Mountain geography and rural poverty materially affect serviceable housing, so live review should treat this as an evidence gap.

World Bank — Lesotho country overview
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
+5.0↓

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

+5.0
Capacity 25%
+45.0× 25%= +11.3 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

WFP reports 631,000 food-insecure people, 56% of households unable to afford a nutritious diet, and 36% stunting among children under five. National school feeding and climate-smart smallholder support are established programmes, but high prices and climate shocks keep food access fragile.

Reach 35%
+25.0× 35%= +8.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Recorded value matches a new ladder step. Full new-method status requires a source-led audit of the coverage and access conditions; the number alone is not proof.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food direct audit pending. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

25.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WFP reports 631,000 food-insecure people, 56% of households unable to afford a nutritious diet, and 36% stunting among children under five. National school feeding and climate-smart smallholder support are established programmes, but high prices and climate shocks keep food access fragile.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction / Waste 25%
-78.0× 25%= -19.5 points
Exact point calculation

-78.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -19.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WFP reports 631,000 food-insecure people, 56% of households unable to afford a nutritious diet, and 36% stunting among children under five. National school feeding and climate-smart smallholder support are established programmes, but high prices and climate shocks keep food access fragile.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Multiplication 15%
+30.0× 15%= +4.5 points
Exact point calculation

30.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WFP reports 631,000 food-insecure people, 56% of households unable to afford a nutritious diet, and 36% stunting among children under five. National school feeding and climate-smart smallholder support are established programmes, but high prices and climate shocks keep food access fragile.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+5.0 Published category score+5.0 Contribution to national evidence score+0.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 11.25 + 8.75 + -19.50 + 4.50 = 5.00

Base: 5.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +5.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 5.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 0.51 points

This category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
+19.5↓

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

+19.5
Capacity 25%
+60.0× 25%= +15.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Only 72% use basic drinking-water services, 50% basic sanitation and 6% basic hygiene facilities. Rural programmes are actively restoring/constructing systems in 250 communities; specific mountain villages only recently moved away from unprotected sources shared with livestock.

Reach 35%
+42.0× 35%= +14.7 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy direct audit pending. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

42.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.70 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Only 72% use basic drinking-water services, 50% basic sanitation and 6% basic hygiene facilities. Rural programmes are actively restoring/constructing systems in 250 communities; specific mountain villages only recently moved away from unprotected sources shared with livestock.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction / Loss 25%
-65.0× 25%= -16.3 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Only 72% use basic drinking-water services, 50% basic sanitation and 6% basic hygiene facilities. Rural programmes are actively restoring/constructing systems in 250 communities; specific mountain villages only recently moved away from unprotected sources shared with livestock.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Regeneration 15%
+40.0× 15%= +6.0 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Only 72% use basic drinking-water services, 50% basic sanitation and 6% basic hygiene facilities. Rural programmes are actively restoring/constructing systems in 250 communities; specific mountain villages only recently moved away from unprotected sources shared with livestock.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+19.5 Published category score+19.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 15.00 + 14.70 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 19.45

Base: 19.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 19.45 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.33 points

This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +18.0

What the evidence found

5% weight Energy & Household Capability
+19.5↓

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

+19.5
Capacity 25%
+60.0× 25%= +15.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Household electricity access reached 59% in 2024, but only 43% in rural areas versus 84% urban. Lesotho has abundant solar, wind and hydropower potential; a 2026 $50m project targets nearly 147,000 people. This is funded implementation, not universal access.

Reach 35%
+42.0× 35%= +14.7 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy direct audit pending. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

42.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.70 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Household electricity access reached 59% in 2024, but only 43% in rural areas versus 84% urban. Lesotho has abundant solar, wind and hydropower potential; a 2026 $50m project targets nearly 147,000 people. This is funded implementation, not universal access.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-65.0× 25%= -16.3 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Household electricity access reached 59% in 2024, but only 43% in rural areas versus 84% urban. Lesotho has abundant solar, wind and hydropower potential; a 2026 $50m project targets nearly 147,000 people. This is funded implementation, not universal access.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Burden Removed 15%
+40.0× 15%= +6.0 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Household electricity access reached 59% in 2024, but only 43% in rural areas versus 84% urban. Lesotho has abundant solar, wind and hydropower potential; a 2026 $50m project targets nearly 147,000 people. This is funded implementation, not universal access.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+19.5 Published category score+19.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 15.00 + 14.70 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 19.45

Base: 19.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 19.45 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.11 points

This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +18.0

What the evidence found

Lesotho: Energy & Household Capability research finding

Household electricity access reached 59% in 2024, but only 43% in rural areas versus 84% urban. Lesotho has abundant solar, wind and hydropower potential; a 2026 $50m project targets nearly 147,000 people. This is funded implementation, not universal access.

2026-05-27 World Bank — World Bank Group Helps Lesotho Expand Energy Access
7% weight Health & Care Reach
+13.8↓

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

+13.8
Capacity 25%
+55.0× 25%= +13.8 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

WHO estimates maternal mortality at 478 per 100,000 live births in 2023, down from 529 in 2020. Emergency referral systems are being strengthened, while HIV/TB burden, rural access and service availability remain major constraints.

Reach 35%
+35.0× 35%= +12.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare direct audit pending. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WHO estimates maternal mortality at 478 per 100,000 live births in 2023, down from 529 in 2020. Emergency referral systems are being strengthened, while HIV/TB burden, rural access and service availability remain major constraints.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-70.0× 25%= -17.5 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WHO estimates maternal mortality at 478 per 100,000 live births in 2023, down from 529 in 2020. Emergency referral systems are being strengthened, while HIV/TB burden, rural access and service availability remain major constraints.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Prevention 15%
+35.0× 15%= +5.3 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WHO estimates maternal mortality at 478 per 100,000 live births in 2023, down from 529 in 2020. Emergency referral systems are being strengthened, while HIV/TB burden, rural access and service availability remain major constraints.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+13.8 Published category score+13.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 12.25 + -17.50 + 5.25 = 13.75

Base: 13.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +13.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 13.75 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.09 points

This category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

6% weight Education & Human Capability
+19.5↓

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

+19.5
Capacity 25%
+60.0× 25%= +15.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Primary enrolment is near universal at 98.7%, but only 82% transition to secondary, early learning reaches roughly 28-30%, disability inclusion is weak and foundational literacy/numeracy remain concerns. 2025 reforms are active implementation.

Reach 35%
+42.0× 35%= +14.7 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

42.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.70 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Primary enrolment is near universal at 98.7%, but only 82% transition to secondary, early learning reaches roughly 28-30%, disability inclusion is weak and foundational literacy/numeracy remain concerns. 2025 reforms are active implementation.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-65.0× 25%= -16.3 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Primary enrolment is near universal at 98.7%, but only 82% transition to secondary, early learning reaches roughly 28-30%, disability inclusion is weak and foundational literacy/numeracy remain concerns. 2025 reforms are active implementation.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Capability 15%
+40.0× 15%= +6.0 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Primary enrolment is near universal at 98.7%, but only 82% transition to secondary, early learning reaches roughly 28-30%, disability inclusion is weak and foundational literacy/numeracy remain concerns. 2025 reforms are active implementation.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+19.5 Published category score+19.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 15.00 + 14.70 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 19.45

Base: 19.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 19.45 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.33 points

This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +18.0

What the evidence found

4% weight Mobility & Reachability
+13.8↓

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

+13.8
Capacity 25%
+55.0× 25%= +13.8 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Mountainous terrain makes roads and transport physically costly and isolates rural/highland communities. Current World Bank operations include transport infrastructure, but a current national all-season road-access measure was not secured.

Reach 35%
+35.0× 35%= +12.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation direct audit pending. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mountainous terrain makes roads and transport physically costly and isolates rural/highland communities. Current World Bank operations include transport infrastructure, but a current national all-season road-access measure was not secured.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-70.0× 25%= -17.5 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mountainous terrain makes roads and transport physically costly and isolates rural/highland communities. Current World Bank operations include transport infrastructure, but a current national all-season road-access measure was not secured.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Time 15%
+35.0× 15%= +5.3 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Mountainous terrain makes roads and transport physically costly and isolates rural/highland communities. Current World Bank operations include transport infrastructure, but a current national all-season road-access measure was not secured.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+13.8 Published category score+13.8 Contribution to national evidence score+0.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 12.25 + -17.50 + 5.25 = 13.75

Base: 13.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +13.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 13.75 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 0.63 points

This category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Lesotho: Mobility & Reachability research finding

Mountainous terrain makes roads and transport physically costly and isolates rural/highland communities. Current World Bank operations include transport infrastructure, but a current national all-season road-access measure was not secured.

World Bank — Lesotho country overview
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
+19.5↓

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

+19.5
Capacity 25%
+60.0× 25%= +15.0 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

The Child Grant Programme and Pathways to Sustainable Livelihoods are established targeted systems. Emergency top-ups reached 45,000 CGP households; broader livelihood programming covers vulnerable households across all districts. Support remains targeted rather than universal.

Reach 35%
+42.0× 35%= +14.7 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

42.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.70 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The Child Grant Programme and Pathways to Sustainable Livelihoods are established targeted systems. Emergency top-ups reached 45,000 CGP households; broader livelihood programming covers vulnerable households across all districts. Support remains targeted rather than universal.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-65.0× 25%= -16.3 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The Child Grant Programme and Pathways to Sustainable Livelihoods are established targeted systems. Emergency top-ups reached 45,000 CGP households; broader livelihood programming covers vulnerable households across all districts. Support remains targeted rather than universal.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Continuity 15%
+40.0× 15%= +6.0 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The Child Grant Programme and Pathways to Sustainable Livelihoods are established targeted systems. Emergency top-ups reached 45,000 CGP households; broader livelihood programming covers vulnerable households across all districts. Support remains targeted rather than universal.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+19.5 Published category score+19.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 15.00 + 14.70 + -16.25 + 6.00 = 19.45

Base: 19.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 19.45 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.77 points

This category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +19.5

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Pending verification

Deduction calculation: Pending; 0 points deducted provisionally, not a verified zero

Final category calculation: +19.5 − 0 = +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Legal status not independently reviewed for this jurisdiction; no deduction is assigned. Pending is not a confirmed absence of recognition.

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +18.0

What the evidence found

5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
+27.5↓

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

+27.5
Capacity 25%
+70.0× 25%= +17.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

No sufficiently current national household tenure/security dataset was secured. Large rural land/resource capacity and customary tenure cannot be converted into an abundance score without stronger household access evidence.

Reach 35%
+50.0× 35%= +17.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Recorded value matches a new ladder step. Full new-method status requires a source-led audit of the coverage and access conditions; the number alone is not proof.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land direct audit pending. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

No sufficiently current national household tenure/security dataset was secured. Large rural land/resource capacity and customary tenure cannot be converted into an abundance score without stronger household access evidence.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction / Concentration 25%
-60.0× 25%= -15.0 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

No sufficiently current national household tenure/security dataset was secured. Large rural land/resource capacity and customary tenure cannot be converted into an abundance score without stronger household access evidence.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Productive Ground 15%
+50.0× 15%= +7.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

No sufficiently current national household tenure/security dataset was secured. Large rural land/resource capacity and customary tenure cannot be converted into an abundance score without stronger household access evidence.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+27.5 Published category score+27.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 7.50 = 27.50

Base: 27.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 27.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.56 points

This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Lesotho: Land Access & Spatial Freedom research finding

No sufficiently current national household tenure/security dataset was secured. Large rural land/resource capacity and customary tenure cannot be converted into an abundance score without stronger household access evidence.

World Bank — Lesotho country overview
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
+27.5↓

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

+27.5
Capacity 25%
+70.0× 25%= +17.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Lesotho's mountains, valleys and rivers create exceptional physical beauty and outdoor-life capacity. Geographic beauty does not establish universal safe, affordable leisure access.

Reach 35%
+50.0× 35%= +17.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Lesotho's mountains, valleys and rivers create exceptional physical beauty and outdoor-life capacity. Geographic beauty does not establish universal safe, affordable leisure access.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-60.0× 25%= -15.0 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Lesotho's mountains, valleys and rivers create exceptional physical beauty and outdoor-life capacity. Geographic beauty does not establish universal safe, affordable leisure access.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Delight 15%
+50.0× 15%= +7.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Lesotho's mountains, valleys and rivers create exceptional physical beauty and outdoor-life capacity. Geographic beauty does not establish universal safe, affordable leisure access.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+27.5 Published category score+27.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 7.50 = 27.50

Base: 27.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 27.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.88 points

This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
+27.5↓

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

+27.5
Capacity 25%
+70.0× 25%= +17.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Highland water, rangelands and renewable resources are major strengths, while drought, floods, soil erosion and climate shocks materially threaten food, water and livelihoods. Climate-smart agriculture is scaling but does not remove those risks.

Reach / Ecological Function 35%
+50.0× 35%= +17.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Highland water, rangelands and renewable resources are major strengths, while drought, floods, soil erosion and climate shocks materially threaten food, water and livelihoods. Climate-smart agriculture is scaling but does not remove those risks.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction / Loss 25%
-60.0× 25%= -15.0 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Highland water, rangelands and renewable resources are major strengths, while drought, floods, soil erosion and climate shocks materially threaten food, water and livelihoods. Climate-smart agriculture is scaling but does not remove those risks.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Regeneration 15%
+50.0× 15%= +7.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Highland water, rangelands and renewable resources are major strengths, while drought, floods, soil erosion and climate shocks materially threaten food, water and livelihoods. Climate-smart agriculture is scaling but does not remove those risks.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+27.5 Published category score+27.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 7.50 = 27.50

Base: 27.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 27.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.88 points

This category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
+13.8↓

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

+13.8
Capacity 25%
+55.0× 25%= +13.8 points
Exact point calculation

55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Police reported reductions in several serious crimes during 2025, while vehicle and stock theft remain explicit operational concerns. Available evidence is partial and district/agency reporting is not enough for a blanket national safety claim.

Reach 35%
+35.0× 35%= +12.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score uses an earlier continuous Reach assessment. It remains in the published historical record until this country receives a sourced Reach-ladder re-audit. It has not been rounded or silently re-ranked.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Police reported reductions in several serious crimes during 2025, while vehicle and stock theft remain explicit operational concerns. Available evidence is partial and district/agency reporting is not enough for a blanket national safety claim.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction 25%
-70.0× 25%= -17.5 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Police reported reductions in several serious crimes during 2025, while vehicle and stock theft remain explicit operational concerns. Available evidence is partial and district/agency reporting is not enough for a blanket national safety claim.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Reliability 15%
+35.0× 15%= +5.3 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Police reported reductions in several serious crimes during 2025, while vehicle and stock theft remain explicit operational concerns. Available evidence is partial and district/agency reporting is not enough for a blanket national safety claim.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+13.8 Published category score+13.8 Contribution to national evidence score+0.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 13.75 + 12.25 + -17.50 + 5.25 = 13.75

Base: 13.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +13.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 13.75 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 0.78 points

This category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
+5.0↓

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

+5.0
Capacity 25%
+45.0× 25%= +11.3 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

A national solid-waste strategy launched in 2026 promotes recycling, reuse and reduction; plastic-levy and e-waste measures are also active. Strategy and partial programmes are meaningful, but evidence of a nationwide closed material-return system was not found.

Reach 35%
+25.0× 35%= +8.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings stay unchanged until re-reviewed.

The transportation thresholds are defined first. This category follows the same 25-point scale, but needs its own domain-specific coverage and free-access evidence before a revised Reach value is published.

Exact point calculation

25.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

A national solid-waste strategy launched in 2026 promotes recycling, reuse and reduction; plastic-levy and e-waste measures are also active. Strategy and partial programmes are meaningful, but evidence of a nationwide closed material-return system was not found.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Friction / Waste 25%
-78.0× 25%= -19.5 points
Exact point calculation

-78.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -19.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

A national solid-waste strategy launched in 2026 promotes recycling, reuse and reduction; plastic-levy and e-waste measures are also active. Strategy and partial programmes are meaningful, but evidence of a nationwide closed material-return system was not found.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Return / Circularity 15%
+30.0× 15%= +4.5 points
Exact point calculation

30.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

A national solid-waste strategy launched in 2026 promotes recycling, reuse and reduction; plastic-levy and e-waste measures are also active. Strategy and partial programmes are meaningful, but evidence of a nationwide closed material-return system was not found.

This reviewed profile predates rail-by-rail provenance. The verified category evidence used for the judgement is shown here without pretending that one source was archived exclusively for this rail.

Weighted rail subtotal+5.0 Published category score+5.0 Contribution to national evidence score+0.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 11.25 + 8.75 + -19.50 + 4.50 = 5.00

Base: 5.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +5.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 5.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 0.23 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

This category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across the country’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

6% weight · research presentInternational Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending

The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.

Country findings and sources

6% weight · research presentExternal Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending

The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Exported waste / garbageAudit pending
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

Country findings and sources

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.