Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Haiti 🇭🇹

Haiti currently ranks #240 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -90.52. This country is money-gated (1.00/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in External Footprint and weakest in Justice across 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Tracking baselineEvidence through 13 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-90.5
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: -63.9 · Money Gate: 1.00/20 · Headline: -90.5.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#240of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

HaitiLast recorded move: down from #239 to #240.Recent recorded movements
  1. #239 → #24021 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500
  2. #238 → #23921 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500
  3. #225 → #23820 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #225 → #23020 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 80: rank 230. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 80: rank 241. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 80: rank 241. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 80: rank 241. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 80: rank 240. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 80: rank 239. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 80: rank 240. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 80: rank 239. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 80: rank 238. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 80: rank 239. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 80: rank 238. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 80: rank 235. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 80: rank 233. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 80: rank 232. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 80: rank 231. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 80: rank 230. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 80: rank 239. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 80: rank 237. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 80: rank 236. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 80: rank 235. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 80: rank 234. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 80: rank 233. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 80: rank 232. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 80: rank 231. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 80: rank 230. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 80: rank 229. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 80: rank 228. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 80: rank 227. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 80: rank 226. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 80: rank 225. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 80: rank 224. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 80: rank 223. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 80: rank 222. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 80: rank 221. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 80: rank 220. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 80: rank 219. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 80: rank 218. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 80: rank 217. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 80: rank 216. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 80: rank 215. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 80: rank 214. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 80: rank 213. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 80: rank 212. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 80: rank 211. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 45 of 80: rank 210. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 46 of 80: rank 209. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 47 of 80: rank 208. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 48 of 80: rank 207. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 49 of 80: rank 206. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 50 of 80: rank 205. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 51 of 80: rank 204. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 52 of 80: rank 203. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 53 of 80: rank 202. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 54 of 80: rank 201. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 55 of 80: rank 200. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 56 of 80: rank 199. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 57 of 80: rank 198. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 58 of 80: rank 197. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 59 of 80: rank 196. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 60 of 80: rank 195. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 61 of 80: rank 194. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 62 of 80: rank 193. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 63 of 80: rank 192. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 64 of 80: rank 191. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 65 of 80: rank 190. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 66 of 80: rank 189. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 67 of 80: rank 188. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 68 of 80: rank 187. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 69 of 80: rank 186. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 70 of 80: rank 185. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 71 of 80: rank 184. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 72 of 80: rank 182. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 73 of 80: rank 181. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 74 of 80: rank 179. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 75 of 80: rank 177. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 76 of 80: rank 201. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 77 of 80: rank 225. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 78 of 80: rank 230. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 79 of 80: rank 239. 21 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500Recorded period 80 of 80: rank 240. 21 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500NOW #240Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

100%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% = 100.00% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#110

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

0.5 / 4

Food

Why 0.5 / 4?

WFP-supported national school meals are a real no-payment food route, but severe national food insecurity means this is narrow institutional credit rather than ordinary free nourishment.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
0.0 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 0.0 / 4?

No dependable ordinary no-payment housing or land baseline was verified.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
0.5 / 4

Healthcare

Why 0.5 / 4?

Public and humanitarian care provides some no-payment access, but facility closures and severe reach failures keep credit very low.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
0.0 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.0 / 4?

No broad zero-fare ordinary transportation baseline was verified.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
0.0 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 0.0 / 4?

Water and electricity access are incomplete and unreliable; no dependable national no-payment baseline was verified.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
Money Gate score
  • Food0.5 / 4
  • Housing / Land0.0 / 4
  • Healthcare0.5 / 4
  • Transportation0.0 / 4
  • Water / Energy0.0 / 4
  • Money still needed19.0 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 1.0 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 0.50 + Housing / Land 0.00 + Healthcare 0.50 + Transportation 0.00 + Water / Energy 0.00 = 1.00 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
95.5 / 100
Why 95.5 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -90.90) ÷ 2 = 95.45 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-47.5
Why -47.5?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 1.00 = -47.5

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-93.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -75.0

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-93.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-89.5× 25%= -22.4 points
Exact point calculation

-57.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -14.25 weighted points

Original evidence -57.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.1; Money-gated reading -89.5 × 25% = -22.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and WFP reporting show a large share of Haitians facing severe poverty, insecurity and repeated household burden while basic services remain fragile. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

World Bank and WFP reporting show a large share of Haitians facing severe poverty, insecurity and repeated household burden while basic services remain fragile.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-92.2× 35%= -32.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-67.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -23.45 weighted points

Original evidence -67.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.1; Money-gated reading -92.2 × 35% = -32.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and WFP reporting show a large share of Haitians facing severe poverty, insecurity and repeated household burden while basic services remain fragile. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-99.0× 25%= -24.7 points
Exact point calculation

-93.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -23.25 weighted points

Original evidence -93.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -96.1; Money-gated reading -99.0 × 25% = -24.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, employment-to-population ratio is a labour-market indicator. It does not reveal domestic care work, multiple-job overlap, commuting or daily disposable time for a family of five. Retain the earlier authored Human Time judgment until a specific time-use series is verified.

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and WFP reporting show a large share of Haitians facing severe poverty, insecurity and repeated household burden while basic services remain fragile. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-93.7× 15%= -14.1 points
Exact point calculation

-73.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -10.95 weighted points

Original evidence -73.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -76.1; Money-gated reading -93.7 × 15% = -14.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and WFP reporting show a large share of Haitians facing severe poverty, insecurity and repeated household burden while basic services remain fragile. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -22.38 + -32.25 + -24.74 + -14.07 = -93.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -71.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -3.1. Effective evidence: -75.0. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -93.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-71.9 Published research adjustment-3.1 Original evidence category score-75.0 Contribution to national evidence score-6.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -14.25 + -23.45 + -23.25 + -10.95 = -71.90

Base: -75.00 · reviewed adjustment: -3.10 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -75.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -75.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -6.75 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

For Haiti, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -6.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Haiti: employment ratio is context, not family time

For Haiti, employment-to-population ratio is a labour-market indicator. It does not reveal domestic care work, multiple-job overlap, commuting or daily disposable time for a family of five. Retain the earlier authored Human Time judgment until a specific time-use series is verified.

2026-10-14 World Bank WDI — employment-to-population ratio
Haiti: human time burden — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and WFP reporting show a large share of Haitians facing severe poverty, insecurity and repeated household burden while basic services remain fragile. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: human time burden — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and WFP reporting show a large share of Haitians facing severe poverty, insecurity and repeated household burden while basic services remain fragile. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: human time burden — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and WFP reporting show a large share of Haitians facing severe poverty, insecurity and repeated household burden while basic services remain fragile. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: human time burden — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: World Bank and WFP reporting show a large share of Haitians facing severe poverty, insecurity and repeated household burden while basic services remain fragile. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Households face extreme livelihood and food-security pressure

World Bank and WFP reporting show a large share of Haitians facing severe poverty, insecurity and repeated household burden while basic services remain fragile.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Haiti
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-94.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence -80.0

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-94.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-90.9× 25%= -22.7 points
Exact point calculation

-62.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.50 weighted points

Original evidence -62.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.5; Money-gated reading -90.9 × 25% = -22.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale internal displacement and insecurity leave many families without stable ordinary shelter; no dependable national no-payment housing route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-93.6× 35%= -32.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-72.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -25.20 weighted points

Original evidence -72.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -75.5; Money-gated reading -93.6 × 35% = -32.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale internal displacement and insecurity leave many families without stable ordinary shelter; no dependable national no-payment housing route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Haiti, large-scale internal displacement and insecurity leave many families without stable ordinary shelter; no dependable national no-payment housing route was verified.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-100.0× 25%= -25.0 points
Exact point calculation

-98.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -24.50 weighted points

Original evidence -98.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -100.0; Money-gated reading -100.0 × 25% = -25.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale internal displacement and insecurity leave many families without stable ordinary shelter; no dependable national no-payment housing route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-95.1× 15%= -14.3 points
Exact point calculation

-78.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -11.70 weighted points

Original evidence -78.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -81.5; Money-gated reading -95.1 × 15% = -14.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale internal displacement and insecurity leave many families without stable ordinary shelter; no dependable national no-payment housing route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -22.73 + -32.75 + -25.00 + -14.27 = -94.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -76.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -3.1. Effective evidence: -80.0. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -94.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-76.9 Published research adjustment-3.1 Original evidence category score-80.0 Contribution to national evidence score-6.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -15.50 + -25.20 + -24.50 + -11.70 = -76.90

Base: -80.00 · reviewed adjustment: -3.10 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -80.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -80.00 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -6.40 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Haiti, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -6.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Haiti: housing shelter reach — rail 4 review

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale internal displacement and insecurity leave many families without stable ordinary shelter; no dependable national no-payment housing route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Haiti
Haiti: housing shelter reach — rail 3 review

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale internal displacement and insecurity leave many families without stable ordinary shelter; no dependable national no-payment housing route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Haiti
Haiti: housing shelter reach — rail 2 review

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale internal displacement and insecurity leave many families without stable ordinary shelter; no dependable national no-payment housing route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Haiti
Haiti: housing shelter reach — rail 1 review

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale internal displacement and insecurity leave many families without stable ordinary shelter; no dependable national no-payment housing route was verified. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Haiti
Displacement sharply weakens secure family shelter

For Haiti, large-scale internal displacement and insecurity leave many families without stable ordinary shelter; no dependable national no-payment housing route was verified.

2026-10-05 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Haiti
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-96.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -85.0

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-96.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-92.7× 25%= -23.2 points
Exact point calculation

-67.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.75 weighted points

Original evidence -67.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -72.1; Money-gated reading -92.7 × 25% = -23.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: WFP supports Haiti’s national school-meals system while more than half the population remains food insecure; the free route earns limited gate credit but cannot substitute for household food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-95.3× 35%= -33.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-77.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -26.95 weighted points

Original evidence -77.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -82.1; Money-gated reading -95.3 × 35% = -33.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: WFP supports Haiti’s national school-meals system while more than half the population remains food insecure; the free route earns limited gate credit but cannot substitute for household food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-100.0× 25%= -25.0 points
Exact point calculation

-100.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -25.00 weighted points

Original evidence -100.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -100.0; Money-gated reading -100.0 × 25% = -25.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: WFP supports Haiti’s national school-meals system while more than half the population remains food insecure; the free route earns limited gate credit but cannot substitute for household food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

WFP supports Haiti’s national school-meals system while more than half the population remains food insecure; the free route earns limited gate credit but cannot substitute for household food abundance.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-96.9× 15%= -14.5 points
Exact point calculation

-83.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -12.45 weighted points

Original evidence -83.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -88.1; Money-gated reading -96.9 × 15% = -14.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: WFP supports Haiti’s national school-meals system while more than half the population remains food insecure; the free route earns limited gate credit but cannot substitute for household food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -23.17 + -33.36 + -25.00 + -14.53 = -96.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -81.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -3.8. Effective evidence: -85.0. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -96.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-81.2 Published research adjustment-3.8 Original evidence category score-85.0 Contribution to national evidence score-7.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -16.75 + -26.95 + -25.00 + -12.45 = -81.15

Base: -85.00 · reviewed adjustment: -3.85 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -85.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -85.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -7.65 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Haiti, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -7.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Haiti: food nourishment free food — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: WFP supports Haiti’s national school-meals system while more than half the population remains food insecure; the free route earns limited gate credit but cannot substitute for household food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Haiti
Haiti: food nourishment free food — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: WFP supports Haiti’s national school-meals system while more than half the population remains food insecure; the free route earns limited gate credit but cannot substitute for household food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Haiti
Haiti: food nourishment free food — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: WFP supports Haiti’s national school-meals system while more than half the population remains food insecure; the free route earns limited gate credit but cannot substitute for household food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Haiti
Haiti: food nourishment free food — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: WFP supports Haiti’s national school-meals system while more than half the population remains food insecure; the free route earns limited gate credit but cannot substitute for household food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Haiti
School meals create a real free-food route amid severe hunger

WFP supports Haiti’s national school-meals system while more than half the population remains food insecure; the free route earns limited gate credit but cannot substitute for household food abundance.

2026-10-05 World Food Programme — Haiti
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-92.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -70.0

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-92.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-88.2× 25%= -22.1 points
Exact point calculation

-52.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.00 weighted points

Original evidence -52.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.1; Money-gated reading -88.2 × 25% = -22.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Basic water access and sanitation remain incomplete and vulnerable to crisis, so physical capacity and dependable reach are both weak. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-90.8× 35%= -31.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-62.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -21.70 weighted points

Original evidence -62.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.1; Money-gated reading -90.8 × 35% = -31.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Basic water access and sanitation remain incomplete and vulnerable to crisis, so physical capacity and dependable reach are both weak. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-97.7× 25%= -24.4 points
Exact point calculation

-88.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -22.00 weighted points

Original evidence -88.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -91.1; Money-gated reading -97.7 × 25% = -24.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Basic water access and sanitation remain incomplete and vulnerable to crisis, so physical capacity and dependable reach are both weak. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-92.4× 15%= -13.9 points
Exact point calculation

-68.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -10.20 weighted points

Original evidence -68.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -71.1; Money-gated reading -92.4 × 15% = -13.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Basic water access and sanitation remain incomplete and vulnerable to crisis, so physical capacity and dependable reach are both weak. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Haiti, basic water access and sanitation remain incomplete and vulnerable to crisis, so physical capacity and dependable reach are both weak.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -22.05 + -31.79 + -24.42 + -13.87 = -92.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -66.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -3.1. Effective evidence: -70.0. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -92.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-66.9 Published research adjustment-3.1 Original evidence category score-70.0 Contribution to national evidence score-4.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -13.00 + -21.70 + -22.00 + -10.20 = -66.90

Base: -70.00 · reviewed adjustment: -3.10 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -70.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -70.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -4.20 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Haiti, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -4.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Haiti: water sanitation — rail 4 review

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Basic water access and sanitation remain incomplete and vulnerable to crisis, so physical capacity and dependable reach are both weak. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Haiti
Haiti: water sanitation — rail 3 review

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Basic water access and sanitation remain incomplete and vulnerable to crisis, so physical capacity and dependable reach are both weak. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Haiti
Haiti: water sanitation — rail 2 review

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Basic water access and sanitation remain incomplete and vulnerable to crisis, so physical capacity and dependable reach are both weak. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Haiti
Haiti: water sanitation — rail 1 review

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Basic water access and sanitation remain incomplete and vulnerable to crisis, so physical capacity and dependable reach are both weak. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Haiti
Safe water and sanitation remain materially incomplete

For Haiti, basic water access and sanitation remain incomplete and vulnerable to crisis, so physical capacity and dependable reach are both weak.

2026-10-05 World Bank Data — Haiti
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-93.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -75.0

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-93.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-89.5× 25%= -22.4 points
Exact point calculation

-57.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -14.25 weighted points

Original evidence -57.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.1; Money-gated reading -89.5 × 25% = -22.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: World Bank data report electricity access at roughly half the population, with reliability and affordability adding further household friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-92.2× 35%= -32.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-67.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -23.45 weighted points

Original evidence -67.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.1; Money-gated reading -92.2 × 35% = -32.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: World Bank data report electricity access at roughly half the population, with reliability and affordability adding further household friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-99.0× 25%= -24.7 points
Exact point calculation

-93.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -23.25 weighted points

Original evidence -93.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -96.1; Money-gated reading -99.0 × 25% = -24.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: World Bank data report electricity access at roughly half the population, with reliability and affordability adding further household friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-93.7× 15%= -14.1 points
Exact point calculation

-73.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -10.95 weighted points

Original evidence -73.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -76.1; Money-gated reading -93.7 × 15% = -14.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: World Bank data report electricity access at roughly half the population, with reliability and affordability adding further household friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Haiti, world Bank data report electricity access at roughly half the population, with reliability and affordability adding further household friction.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -22.38 + -32.25 + -24.74 + -14.07 = -93.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -71.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -3.1. Effective evidence: -75.0. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -93.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-71.9 Published research adjustment-3.1 Original evidence category score-75.0 Contribution to national evidence score-3.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -14.25 + -23.45 + -23.25 + -10.95 = -71.90

Base: -75.00 · reviewed adjustment: -3.10 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -75.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -75.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -3.75 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Haiti, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -3.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Haiti: energy household capability — rail 4 review

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: World Bank data report electricity access at roughly half the population, with reliability and affordability adding further household friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Haiti
Haiti: energy household capability — rail 3 review

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: World Bank data report electricity access at roughly half the population, with reliability and affordability adding further household friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Haiti
Haiti: energy household capability — rail 2 review

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: World Bank data report electricity access at roughly half the population, with reliability and affordability adding further household friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Haiti
Haiti: energy household capability — rail 1 review

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: World Bank data report electricity access at roughly half the population, with reliability and affordability adding further household friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Haiti
Electricity reaches only part of the population

For Haiti, world Bank data report electricity access at roughly half the population, with reliability and affordability adding further household friction.

2026-10-05 World Bank Data — Haiti
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-96.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -85.0

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-96.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-92.7× 25%= -23.2 points
Exact point calculation

-67.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.75 weighted points

Original evidence -67.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -72.1; Money-gated reading -92.7 × 25% = -23.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Many facilities are closed or only partly operational and large numbers of people lack essential care; humanitarian and public services provide some no-payment access but not dependable national coverage. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-95.3× 35%= -33.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 0.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-77.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -26.95 weighted points

Original evidence -77.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -82.1; Money-gated reading -95.3 × 35% = -33.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Many facilities are closed or only partly operational and large numbers of people lack essential care; humanitarian and public services provide some no-payment access but not dependable national coverage. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-100.0× 25%= -25.0 points
Exact point calculation

-100.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -25.00 weighted points

Original evidence -100.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -100.0; Money-gated reading -100.0 × 25% = -25.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Many facilities are closed or only partly operational and large numbers of people lack essential care; humanitarian and public services provide some no-payment access but not dependable national coverage. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-96.9× 15%= -14.5 points
Exact point calculation

-83.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -12.45 weighted points

Original evidence -83.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -88.1; Money-gated reading -96.9 × 15% = -14.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Many facilities are closed or only partly operational and large numbers of people lack essential care; humanitarian and public services provide some no-payment access but not dependable national coverage. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Haiti, many facilities are closed or only partly operational and large numbers of people lack essential care; humanitarian and public services provide some no-payment access but not dependable national coverage.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -23.17 + -33.36 + -25.00 + -14.53 = -96.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -81.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -3.8. Effective evidence: -85.0. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -96.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-81.2 Published research adjustment-3.8 Original evidence category score-85.0 Contribution to national evidence score-6.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -16.75 + -26.95 + -25.00 + -12.45 = -81.15

Base: -85.00 · reviewed adjustment: -3.85 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -85.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -85.00 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -5.95 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Haiti, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -6.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Haiti: health care reach — rail 4 review

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Many facilities are closed or only partly operational and large numbers of people lack essential care; humanitarian and public services provide some no-payment access but not dependable national coverage. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — Haiti health summary
Haiti: health care reach — rail 3 review

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Many facilities are closed or only partly operational and large numbers of people lack essential care; humanitarian and public services provide some no-payment access but not dependable national coverage. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — Haiti health summary
Haiti: health care reach — rail 2 review

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Many facilities are closed or only partly operational and large numbers of people lack essential care; humanitarian and public services provide some no-payment access but not dependable national coverage. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — Haiti health summary
Haiti: health care reach — rail 1 review

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Many facilities are closed or only partly operational and large numbers of people lack essential care; humanitarian and public services provide some no-payment access but not dependable national coverage. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — Haiti health summary
Health-system reach is severely constrained by crisis

For Haiti, many facilities are closed or only partly operational and large numbers of people lack essential care; humanitarian and public services provide some no-payment access but not dependable national coverage.

2026-10-05 Human Rights Watch — Haiti health summary
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-90.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence -65.0

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-90.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-86.9× 25%= -21.7 points
Exact point calculation

-47.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.75 weighted points

Original evidence -47.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.1; Money-gated reading -86.9 × 25% = -21.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Public and partner-supported education capacity remains important but insecurity, displacement and poverty disrupt stable learning reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-89.5× 35%= -31.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-57.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -19.95 weighted points

Original evidence -57.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.1; Money-gated reading -89.5 × 35% = -31.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Public and partner-supported education capacity remains important but insecurity, displacement and poverty disrupt stable learning reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-96.4× 25%= -24.1 points
Exact point calculation

-83.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -20.75 weighted points

Original evidence -83.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -86.1; Money-gated reading -96.4 × 25% = -24.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Public and partner-supported education capacity remains important but insecurity, displacement and poverty disrupt stable learning reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-91.1× 15%= -13.7 points
Exact point calculation

-63.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -9.45 weighted points

Original evidence -63.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -66.1; Money-gated reading -91.1 × 15% = -13.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Public and partner-supported education capacity remains important but insecurity, displacement and poverty disrupt stable learning reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Haiti, public and partner-supported education capacity remains important but insecurity, displacement and poverty disrupt stable learning reach.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -21.73 + -31.33 + -24.09 + -13.66 = -90.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -61.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -3.1. Effective evidence: -65.0. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -90.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-61.9 Published research adjustment-3.1 Original evidence category score-65.0 Contribution to national evidence score-3.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -11.75 + -19.95 + -20.75 + -9.45 = -61.90

Base: -65.00 · reviewed adjustment: -3.10 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -65.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -65.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -3.90 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Haiti, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -3.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Haiti: education human capability — rail 4 review

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Public and partner-supported education capacity remains important but insecurity, displacement and poverty disrupt stable learning reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: education human capability — rail 3 review

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Public and partner-supported education capacity remains important but insecurity, displacement and poverty disrupt stable learning reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: education human capability — rail 2 review

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Public and partner-supported education capacity remains important but insecurity, displacement and poverty disrupt stable learning reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: education human capability — rail 1 review

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Public and partner-supported education capacity remains important but insecurity, displacement and poverty disrupt stable learning reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Schooling continues under major access and disruption pressure

For Haiti, public and partner-supported education capacity remains important but insecurity, displacement and poverty disrupt stable learning reach.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Haiti
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-93.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -75.0

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-93.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-89.5× 25%= -22.4 points
Exact point calculation

-57.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -14.25 weighted points

Original evidence -57.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.1; Money-gated reading -89.5 × 25% = -22.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: All-weather road access and safe mobility remain active development priorities, showing persistent reachability barriers. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-92.2× 35%= -32.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

-67.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -23.45 weighted points

Original evidence -67.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.1; Money-gated reading -92.2 × 35% = -32.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: All-weather road access and safe mobility remain active development priorities, showing persistent reachability barriers. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-99.0× 25%= -24.7 points
Exact point calculation

-93.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -23.25 weighted points

Original evidence -93.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -96.1; Money-gated reading -99.0 × 25% = -24.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: All-weather road access and safe mobility remain active development priorities, showing persistent reachability barriers. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-93.7× 15%= -14.1 points
Exact point calculation

-73.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -10.95 weighted points

Original evidence -73.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -76.1; Money-gated reading -93.7 × 15% = -14.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: All-weather road access and safe mobility remain active development priorities, showing persistent reachability barriers. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Haiti, all-weather road access and safe mobility remain active development priorities, showing persistent reachability barriers.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -22.38 + -32.25 + -24.74 + -14.07 = -93.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -71.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -3.1. Effective evidence: -75.0. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -93.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-71.9 Published research adjustment-3.1 Original evidence category score-75.0 Contribution to national evidence score-3.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -14.25 + -23.45 + -23.25 + -10.95 = -71.90

Base: -75.00 · reviewed adjustment: -3.10 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -75.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -75.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -3.00 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Haiti, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -3.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Haiti: mobility reachability — rail 4 review

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: All-weather road access and safe mobility remain active development priorities, showing persistent reachability barriers. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: mobility reachability — rail 3 review

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: All-weather road access and safe mobility remain active development priorities, showing persistent reachability barriers. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: mobility reachability — rail 2 review

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: All-weather road access and safe mobility remain active development priorities, showing persistent reachability barriers. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: mobility reachability — rail 1 review

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: All-weather road access and safe mobility remain active development priorities, showing persistent reachability barriers. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Road and security conditions obstruct ordinary movement

For Haiti, all-weather road access and safe mobility remain active development priorities, showing persistent reachability barriers.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Haiti
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-79.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence -23.6

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-79.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-78.4× 25%= -19.6 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -17.6; Money-gated reading -78.4 × 25% = -19.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Haiti’s 2024 TFR is 2.625, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal, but displacement, insecurity, hunger and service failure sharply reduce the lived family-environment component. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-79.7× 35%= -27.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -22.75 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -22.6; Money-gated reading -79.7 × 35% = -27.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Haiti’s 2024 TFR is 2.625, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal, but displacement, insecurity, hunger and service failure sharply reduce the lived family-environment component. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-83.6× 25%= -20.9 points
Exact point calculation

-80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -20.00 weighted points

Original evidence -80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -37.6; Money-gated reading -83.6 × 25% = -20.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Haiti’s 2024 TFR is 2.625, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal, but displacement, insecurity, hunger and service failure sharply reduce the lived family-environment component. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-77.0× 15%= -11.6 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -8.25 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -12.6; Money-gated reading -77.0 × 15% = -11.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Haiti’s 2024 TFR is 2.625, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal, but displacement, insecurity, hunger and service failure sharply reduce the lived family-environment component. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Haiti’s 2024 TFR is 2.625, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal, but displacement, insecurity, hunger and service failure sharply reduce the lived family-environment component.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.59 + -27.89 + -20.90 + -11.56 = -79.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -66.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): +42.4. Effective evidence: -23.6. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -79.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-66.0 Published family-method adjustment+42.4 Original evidence category score-23.6 Contribution to national evidence score-1.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -15.00 + -22.75 + -20.00 + -8.25 = -66.00

Base: -23.57 · reviewed adjustment: 42.43 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -23.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -23.57 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.89 points

Why the family-method adjustment is applied

New and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. Family Fertility Method 1.0.0: lived family environment -65.0 (60%) + 2024 TFR 2.625, fertility performance +38.58 (40%) = -23.57. The TFR source is World Bank WDI via FRED. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Haiti, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: -23.6

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: -23.6 − 0 = -23.6 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Haiti: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded by the 2026-10-10 legal-status review. Country is included in the 2026 legal-status survey under a status other than generally available domestic civil marriage. This describes legal status, not a demonstrated effect on birth rates.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2026-10-10 (access date; verify publication date in linked source) · Reviewed: 2026-10-10

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +5.0

What the evidence found

Haiti: family formation stability — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Haiti’s 2024 TFR is 2.625, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal, but displacement, insecurity, hunger and service failure sharply reduce the lived family-environment component. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank WDI / FRED
Haiti: family formation stability — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Haiti’s 2024 TFR is 2.625, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal, but displacement, insecurity, hunger and service failure sharply reduce the lived family-environment component. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank WDI / FRED
Haiti: family formation stability — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Haiti’s 2024 TFR is 2.625, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal, but displacement, insecurity, hunger and service failure sharply reduce the lived family-environment component. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank WDI / FRED
Haiti: family formation stability — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Haiti’s 2024 TFR is 2.625, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal, but displacement, insecurity, hunger and service failure sharply reduce the lived family-environment component. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank WDI / FRED
Fertility remains above replacement while family conditions are under acute strain

Haiti’s 2024 TFR is 2.625, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal, but displacement, insecurity, hunger and service failure sharply reduce the lived family-environment component.

2026-10-05 World Bank WDI / FRED

Published indicators

Total fertility rate2.63 births per woman

World Bank World Development Indicators via FRED · 2024

Source
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-88.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence -55.0

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-88.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-84.3× 25%= -21.1 points
Exact point calculation

-37.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -9.25 weighted points

Original evidence -37.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -40.1; Money-gated reading -84.3 × 25% = -21.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Rural livelihoods depend heavily on land while insecurity, degradation and limited infrastructure constrain secure productive use. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-86.9× 35%= -30.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-47.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -16.45 weighted points

Original evidence -47.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.1; Money-gated reading -86.9 × 35% = -30.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Rural livelihoods depend heavily on land while insecurity, degradation and limited infrastructure constrain secure productive use. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-93.7× 25%= -23.4 points
Exact point calculation

-73.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -18.25 weighted points

Original evidence -73.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -76.1; Money-gated reading -93.7 × 25% = -23.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Rural livelihoods depend heavily on land while insecurity, degradation and limited infrastructure constrain secure productive use. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-88.5× 15%= -13.3 points
Exact point calculation

-53.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -7.95 weighted points

Original evidence -53.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -56.1; Money-gated reading -88.5 × 15% = -13.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Rural livelihoods depend heavily on land while insecurity, degradation and limited infrastructure constrain secure productive use. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Haiti, rural livelihoods depend heavily on land while insecurity, degradation and limited infrastructure constrain secure productive use.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -21.07 + -30.42 + -23.43 + -13.27 = -88.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -51.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -3.1. Effective evidence: -55.0. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -88.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-51.9 Published research adjustment-3.1 Original evidence category score-55.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -9.25 + -16.45 + -18.25 + -7.95 = -51.90

Base: -55.00 · reviewed adjustment: -3.10 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -55.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -55.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -2.75 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Haiti, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Haiti: land spatial freedom — rail 4 review

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Rural livelihoods depend heavily on land while insecurity, degradation and limited infrastructure constrain secure productive use. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: land spatial freedom — rail 3 review

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Rural livelihoods depend heavily on land while insecurity, degradation and limited infrastructure constrain secure productive use. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: land spatial freedom — rail 2 review

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Rural livelihoods depend heavily on land while insecurity, degradation and limited infrastructure constrain secure productive use. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: land spatial freedom — rail 1 review

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Rural livelihoods depend heavily on land while insecurity, degradation and limited infrastructure constrain secure productive use. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Productive land is pressured by poverty and environmental degradation

For Haiti, rural livelihoods depend heavily on land while insecurity, degradation and limited infrastructure constrain secure productive use.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Haiti
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-97.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -90.0

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-97.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-94.4× 25%= -23.6 points
Exact point calculation

-72.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -18.00 weighted points

Original evidence -72.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -78.8; Money-gated reading -94.4 × 25% = -23.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Severe insecurity and displacement sharply reduce safe everyday recreation, rest and public delight. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-97.1× 35%= -34.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-82.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -28.70 weighted points

Original evidence -82.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -88.8; Money-gated reading -97.1 × 35% = -34.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Severe insecurity and displacement sharply reduce safe everyday recreation, rest and public delight. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-100.0× 25%= -25.0 points
Exact point calculation

-100.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -25.00 weighted points

Original evidence -100.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -100.0; Money-gated reading -100.0 × 25% = -25.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Severe insecurity and displacement sharply reduce safe everyday recreation, rest and public delight. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-98.6× 15%= -14.8 points
Exact point calculation

-88.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -13.20 weighted points

Original evidence -88.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -94.8; Money-gated reading -98.6 × 15% = -14.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Severe insecurity and displacement sharply reduce safe everyday recreation, rest and public delight. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Haiti, severe insecurity and displacement sharply reduce safe everyday recreation, rest and public delight.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -23.61 + -33.97 + -25.00 + -14.80 = -97.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -84.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -5.1. Effective evidence: -90.0. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -97.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-84.9 Published research adjustment-5.1 Original evidence category score-90.0 Contribution to national evidence score-5.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -18.00 + -28.70 + -25.00 + -13.20 = -84.90

Base: -90.00 · reviewed adjustment: -5.10 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -90.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -90.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -5.40 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Haiti, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -5.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Haiti: peace beauty delight — rail 4 review

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Severe insecurity and displacement sharply reduce safe everyday recreation, rest and public delight. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Haiti
Haiti: peace beauty delight — rail 3 review

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Severe insecurity and displacement sharply reduce safe everyday recreation, rest and public delight. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Haiti
Haiti: peace beauty delight — rail 2 review

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Severe insecurity and displacement sharply reduce safe everyday recreation, rest and public delight. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Haiti
Haiti: peace beauty delight — rail 1 review

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Severe insecurity and displacement sharply reduce safe everyday recreation, rest and public delight. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Haiti
Violence and insecurity overwhelm ordinary public-life access

For Haiti, severe insecurity and displacement sharply reduce safe everyday recreation, rest and public delight.

2026-10-05 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Haiti
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-90.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence -65.0

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-90.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-86.9× 25%= -21.7 points
Exact point calculation

-47.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.75 weighted points

Original evidence -47.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.1; Money-gated reading -86.9 × 25% = -21.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: World Bank programmes emphasize watershed, rural road and climate resilience because land and communities remain highly exposed to shocks. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-89.5× 35%= -31.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-57.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -19.95 weighted points

Original evidence -57.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.1; Money-gated reading -89.5 × 35% = -31.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: World Bank programmes emphasize watershed, rural road and climate resilience because land and communities remain highly exposed to shocks. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-96.4× 25%= -24.1 points
Exact point calculation

-83.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -20.75 weighted points

Original evidence -83.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -86.1; Money-gated reading -96.4 × 25% = -24.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: World Bank programmes emphasize watershed, rural road and climate resilience because land and communities remain highly exposed to shocks. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-91.1× 15%= -13.7 points
Exact point calculation

-63.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -9.45 weighted points

Original evidence -63.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -66.1; Money-gated reading -91.1 × 15% = -13.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: World Bank programmes emphasize watershed, rural road and climate resilience because land and communities remain highly exposed to shocks. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Haiti, world Bank programmes emphasize watershed, rural road and climate resilience because land and communities remain highly exposed to shocks.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -21.73 + -31.33 + -24.09 + -13.66 = -90.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -61.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -3.1. Effective evidence: -65.0. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -90.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-61.9 Published research adjustment-3.1 Original evidence category score-65.0 Contribution to national evidence score-3.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -11.75 + -19.95 + -20.75 + -9.45 = -61.90

Base: -65.00 · reviewed adjustment: -3.10 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -65.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -65.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -3.90 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Haiti, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -3.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Haiti: living ground resilience — rail 4 review

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: World Bank programmes emphasize watershed, rural road and climate resilience because land and communities remain highly exposed to shocks. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: living ground resilience — rail 3 review

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: World Bank programmes emphasize watershed, rural road and climate resilience because land and communities remain highly exposed to shocks. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: living ground resilience — rail 2 review

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: World Bank programmes emphasize watershed, rural road and climate resilience because land and communities remain highly exposed to shocks. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: living ground resilience — rail 1 review

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: World Bank programmes emphasize watershed, rural road and climate resilience because land and communities remain highly exposed to shocks. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Climate and landscape resilience require major investment

For Haiti, world Bank programmes emphasize watershed, rural road and climate resilience because land and communities remain highly exposed to shocks.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Haiti
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-98.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence -95.0

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-98.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-96.3× 25%= -24.1 points
Exact point calculation

-77.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -19.25 weighted points

Original evidence -77.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -85.8; Money-gated reading -96.3 × 25% = -24.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Armed violence, displacement and weak institutional reach create severe barriers to ordinary safety and administration. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-98.9× 35%= -34.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-87.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -30.45 weighted points

Original evidence -87.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -95.8; Money-gated reading -98.9 × 35% = -34.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Armed violence, displacement and weak institutional reach create severe barriers to ordinary safety and administration. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-100.0× 25%= -25.0 points
Exact point calculation

-100.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -25.00 weighted points

Original evidence -100.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -100.0; Money-gated reading -100.0 × 25% = -25.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Armed violence, displacement and weak institutional reach create severe barriers to ordinary safety and administration. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-100.0× 15%= -15.0 points
Exact point calculation

-93.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -13.95 weighted points

Original evidence -93.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -100.0; Money-gated reading -100.0 × 15% = -15.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Armed violence, displacement and weak institutional reach create severe barriers to ordinary safety and administration. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Haiti, armed violence, displacement and weak institutional reach create severe barriers to ordinary safety and administration.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -24.07 + -34.62 + -25.00 + -15.00 = -98.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -88.7. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -6.3. Effective evidence: -95.0. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -98.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-88.7 Published research adjustment-6.3 Original evidence category score-95.0 Contribution to national evidence score-4.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -19.25 + -30.45 + -25.00 + -13.95 = -88.65

Base: -95.00 · reviewed adjustment: -6.35 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -95.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -95.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -4.75 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Haiti, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -4.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Haiti: justice safety friction — rail 4 review

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Armed violence, displacement and weak institutional reach create severe barriers to ordinary safety and administration. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Haiti
Haiti: justice safety friction — rail 3 review

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Armed violence, displacement and weak institutional reach create severe barriers to ordinary safety and administration. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Haiti
Haiti: justice safety friction — rail 2 review

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Armed violence, displacement and weak institutional reach create severe barriers to ordinary safety and administration. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Haiti
Haiti: justice safety friction — rail 1 review

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Armed violence, displacement and weak institutional reach create severe barriers to ordinary safety and administration. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Haiti
Violence and institutional fragility impose extreme safety friction

For Haiti, armed violence, displacement and weak institutional reach create severe barriers to ordinary safety and administration.

2026-10-05 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Haiti
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-89.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence -60.0

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-89.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.6× 25%= -21.4 points
Exact point calculation

-42.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.50 weighted points

Original evidence -42.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.1; Money-gated reading -85.6 × 25% = -21.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Weak roads, electricity and water systems create repeated maintenance and replacement pressure rather than durable capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-88.2× 35%= -30.9 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-52.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -18.20 weighted points

Original evidence -52.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.1; Money-gated reading -88.2 × 35% = -30.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Weak roads, electricity and water systems create repeated maintenance and replacement pressure rather than durable capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-95.0× 25%= -23.8 points
Exact point calculation

-78.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -19.50 weighted points

Original evidence -78.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -81.1; Money-gated reading -95.0 × 25% = -23.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Weak roads, electricity and water systems create repeated maintenance and replacement pressure rather than durable capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-89.8× 15%= -13.5 points
Exact point calculation

-58.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -8.70 weighted points

Original evidence -58.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -61.1; Money-gated reading -89.8 × 15% = -13.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Weak roads, electricity and water systems create repeated maintenance and replacement pressure rather than durable capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Haiti, weak roads, electricity and water systems create repeated maintenance and replacement pressure rather than durable capability.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -21.40 + -30.87 + -23.76 + -13.47 = -89.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -56.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -3.1. Effective evidence: -60.0. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -89.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-56.9 Published research adjustment-3.1 Original evidence category score-60.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -10.50 + -18.20 + -19.50 + -8.70 = -56.90

Base: -60.00 · reviewed adjustment: -3.10 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -60.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -60.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -2.40 points

Material transfers: scored in International Footprint

Exporter responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint); importer responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint). Material movement is a real workload; these are TBF authored judgments, not certified illegal dumping estimates. Each role is included ONCE in the Footprint 3.1 published score.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

The material-transfer burden already affects the published score. Facility-specific downstream harm remains a separate research claim. No second penalty is added for the same trade.

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Haiti, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

Haiti: durability material return — rail 4 review

For Haiti, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Weak roads, electricity and water systems create repeated maintenance and replacement pressure rather than durable capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: durability material return — rail 3 review

For Haiti, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Weak roads, electricity and water systems create repeated maintenance and replacement pressure rather than durable capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: durability material return — rail 2 review

For Haiti, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Weak roads, electricity and water systems create repeated maintenance and replacement pressure rather than durable capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: durability material return — rail 1 review

For Haiti, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Weak roads, electricity and water systems create repeated maintenance and replacement pressure rather than durable capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Infrastructure failure increases repeated repair and replacement burden

For Haiti, weak roads, electricity and water systems create repeated maintenance and replacement pressure rather than durable capability.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Haiti
6% weight International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
-76.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence -11.5

International score breakdown

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

-76.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Entry Accessibility 25%
See all nine International Welcome Entry Accessibility scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-75.1× 25%= -18.8 points
Exact point calculation

-5.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -1.25 weighted points

Original evidence -5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -5.0; Money-gated reading -75.1 × 25% = -18.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, lawful entry and practical travel options, visa rules and reachable borders. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale displacement and outward migration show that many families cannot rely on stable local continuity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Migrant Practical Life 30%
See all nine International Welcome Migrant Practical Life scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-77.7× 30%= -23.3 points
Exact point calculation

-15.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = -4.50 weighted points

Original evidence -15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -15.0; Money-gated reading -77.7 × 30% = -23.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, migration, residency and actual ability to live safely with services. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale displacement and outward migration show that many families cannot rely on stable local continuity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome 25%
See all nine International Welcome Refugee / Neighbour Welcome scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-77.7× 25%= -19.4 points
Exact point calculation

-15.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -3.75 weighted points

Original evidence -15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -15.0; Money-gated reading -77.7 × 25% = -19.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, refugee reception, host communities and international protection. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale displacement and outward migration show that many families cannot rely on stable local continuity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Flexibility / Continuity 20%
See all nine International Welcome Flexibility / Continuity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-76.4× 20%= -15.3 points
Exact point calculation

-10.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = -2.00 weighted points

Original evidence -10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -10.0; Money-gated reading -76.4 × 20% = -15.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, family unity, citizenship continuity and predictable renewal of stay. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale displacement and outward migration show that many families cannot rely on stable local continuity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Haiti, large-scale displacement and outward migration show that many families cannot rely on stable local continuity.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -18.77 + -23.31 + -19.42 + -15.27 = -76.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -11.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -11.5. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -76.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-11.5 Original evidence category score-11.5 Contribution to national evidence score-0.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -1.25 + -4.50 + -3.75 + -2.00 = -11.50

Base: -11.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -11.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -11.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.69 points

For Haiti, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

Haiti: international access human welcome — rail 4 review

For Haiti, family unity, citizenship continuity and predictable renewal of stay. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale displacement and outward migration show that many families cannot rely on stable local continuity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: international access human welcome — rail 3 review

For Haiti, refugee reception, host communities and international protection. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale displacement and outward migration show that many families cannot rely on stable local continuity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: international access human welcome — rail 2 review

For Haiti, migration, residency and actual ability to live safely with services. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale displacement and outward migration show that many families cannot rely on stable local continuity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Haiti: international access human welcome — rail 1 review

For Haiti, lawful entry and practical travel options, visa rules and reachable borders. Prior researched country observation: Large-scale displacement and outward migration show that many families cannot rely on stable local continuity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Group — Haiti
Migration and displacement remain central continuity pressures

For Haiti, large-scale displacement and outward migration show that many families cannot rely on stable local continuity.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Haiti
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-76.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -8.8

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-76.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Positive Contribution 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-74.1× 25%= -18.5 points
Exact point calculation

-5.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -1.25 weighted points

Original evidence -5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -1.3; Money-gated reading -74.1 × 25% = -18.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, helpful international contributions and transferable capacity. Prior researched country observation: International programmes provide food, health, resilience and infrastructure support; this is recorded as factual external-context evidence, not a domestic score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-75.4× 25%= -18.9 points
Exact point calculation

-10.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -2.50 weighted points

Original evidence -10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -6.3; Money-gated reading -75.4 × 25% = -18.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, mutuality, dignity and shared benefit to residents and partner communities. Prior researched country observation: International programmes provide food, health, resilience and infrastructure support; this is recorded as factual external-context evidence, not a domestic score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-79.3× 35%= -27.8 points
Exact point calculation

-25.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -21.3; Money-gated reading -79.3 × 35% = -27.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, external social/ecological harm and attempted repair. Prior researched country observation: International programmes provide food, health, resilience and infrastructure support; this is recorded as factual external-context evidence, not a domestic score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Accountability / Repair 15%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-72.8× 15%= -10.9 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +3.8; Money-gated reading -72.8 × 15% = -10.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Haiti, trade-flow scrutiny: volume/handling unknown unless a dated customs record is present. Prior researched country observation: International programmes provide food, health, resilience and infrastructure support; this is recorded as factual external-context evidence, not a domestic score. HS3915 export/import weights and destination-processing pathways were not independently confirmed in this pass; no illegal dumping or zero trade is asserted. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Haiti, international programmes provide food, health, resilience and infrastructure support; this is recorded as factual external-context evidence, not a domestic score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -18.52 + -18.85 + -27.76 + -10.92 = -76.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -12.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): +3.8. Effective evidence: -8.8. Money Gate ceiling: -47.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -76.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-12.5 Published research adjustment+3.8 Original evidence category score-8.8 Contribution to national evidence score-0.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -1.25 + -2.50 + -8.75 + 0.00 = -12.50

Base: -8.75 · reviewed adjustment: 3.75 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -8.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -8.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.53 points

Material transfers: scored in International Footprint

Exporter responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint); importer responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint). Material movement is a real workload; these are TBF authored judgments, not certified illegal dumping estimates. Each role is included ONCE in the Footprint 3.1 published score.

Exported waste / garbageRole: 0.00/100 · scored
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingRole: 0.00/100 · scored

The material-transfer burden already affects the published score. Facility-specific downstream harm remains a separate research claim. No second penalty is added for the same trade.

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

TBF provisional footprint ordinal judgment: 25% useful contribution + 25% mutual benefit + 20% non-trade harm/repair + 15% exporter + 15% importer. HS3915 exporter/importer role unverified; two trade inputs remain unassessed (0 neutral placeholder, NOT proof zero waste or no harm). Trade inputs may change the category when substantiated. No second waste deduction.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Haiti, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Haiti’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

Haiti: external footprint non extractive — rail 4 review

For Haiti, trade-flow scrutiny: volume/handling unknown unless a dated customs record is present. Prior researched country observation: International programmes provide food, health, resilience and infrastructure support; this is recorded as factual external-context evidence, not a domestic score. HS3915 export/import weights and destination-processing pathways were not independently confirmed in this pass; no illegal dumping or zero trade is asserted. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Haiti
Haiti: external footprint non extractive — rail 3 review

For Haiti, external social/ecological harm and attempted repair. Prior researched country observation: International programmes provide food, health, resilience and infrastructure support; this is recorded as factual external-context evidence, not a domestic score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Haiti
Haiti: external footprint non extractive — rail 2 review

For Haiti, mutuality, dignity and shared benefit to residents and partner communities. Prior researched country observation: International programmes provide food, health, resilience and infrastructure support; this is recorded as factual external-context evidence, not a domestic score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Haiti
Haiti: external footprint non extractive — rail 1 review

For Haiti, helpful international contributions and transferable capacity. Prior researched country observation: International programmes provide food, health, resilience and infrastructure support; this is recorded as factual external-context evidence, not a domestic score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Haiti
External support is material but Haiti remains highly aid-dependent

For Haiti, international programmes provide food, health, resilience and infrastructure support; this is recorded as factual external-context evidence, not a domestic score.

2026-10-05 World Food Programme — Haiti

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.