Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Türkiye 🇹🇷

Türkiye currently ranks #107 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -62.08. This country is money-gated (1.75/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Healthcare and weakest in Justice across 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Tracking baselineEvidence through 10 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-62.1
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: +39.5 · Money Gate: 1.75/20 · Headline: -62.1.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#107of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

TürkiyeLast recorded move: down from #97 to #107.Recent recorded movements
  1. #97 → #10720 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  2. #97 → #10020 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  3. #88 → #9720 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #81 → #8820 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 53: rank 103. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 53: rank 104. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 53: rank 104. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 9 Oct 2026 · 07:51 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 53: rank 102. 9 Oct 2026 · 12:04 GMT-0500 – 10 Oct 2026 · 15:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 53: rank 101. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 53: rank 102. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 53: rank 117. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 53: rank 117. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 53: rank 116. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 53: rank 115. 11 Oct 2026 · 02:50 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 53: rank 114. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 53: rank 113. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 53: rank 113. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 53: rank 112. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 53: rank 111. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 53: rank 112. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 53: rank 113. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 53: rank 112. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 53: rank 113. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 53: rank 112. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 53: rank 111. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 53: rank 110. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 53: rank 109. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 53: rank 108. 16 Oct 2026 · 15:38 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 53: rank 107. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 53: rank 106. 18 Oct 2026 · 17:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 53: rank 105. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 53: rank 104. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 53: rank 103. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 53: rank 102. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 53: rank 101. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 53: rank 100. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 53: rank 99. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 53: rank 98. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 53: rank 97. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 53: rank 96. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 53: rank 95. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 53: rank 94. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 53: rank 93. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 53: rank 92. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 53: rank 91. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 53: rank 90. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 53: rank 89. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 53: rank 88. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 45 of 53: rank 87. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 46 of 53: rank 86. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 47 of 53: rank 85. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 48 of 53: rank 84. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 49 of 53: rank 83. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 50 of 53: rank 82. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 51 of 53: rank 88. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 52 of 53: rank 97. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 53 of 53: rank 100. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500SAVED #100CALC #107Oct 2026Oct 2026

Last archived rank #100 · Current calculated rank #107 The dated graph ends at the saved position. The current calculation has not yet been captured as a dated history point; it is not proof of a new score change.

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

97%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 76.0% + 6.0 × 76.0% = 97.12% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#16

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

0.3 / 4

Food

Why 0.3 / 4?

WFP describes targeted food support for vulnerable groups, with no confirmed general household right to free daily food.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
0.3 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 0.3 / 4?

Housing quality and household consumption statistics document access strain; neither demonstrates a nationwide no-charge home or land guarantee.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
1.0 / 4

Healthcare

Why 1.0 / 4?

Public universal health coverage is financed through contribution-based insurance; SGK published 2026 individual premium obligations, while some households receive means-tested relief.

Point calculation

1.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 25.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
0.3 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.3 / 4?

Transport support may be targeted, but published traffic and consumption data do not document ordinary nationwide free trips.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
0.0 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 0.0 / 4?

The electricity and water systems deliver physical services while routine tariff-funded household access remains; no national no-payment continuity is evidenced.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-11
Money Gate score
  • Food0.3 / 4
  • Housing / Land0.3 / 4
  • Healthcare1.0 / 4
  • Transportation0.3 / 4
  • Water / Energy0.0 / 4
  • Money still needed18.3 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 1.8 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 0.25 + Housing / Land 0.25 + Healthcare 1.00 + Transportation 0.25 + Water / Energy 0.00 = 1.75 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
76.9 / 100
Why 76.9 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -53.81) ÷ 2 = 76.91 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-45.6
Why -45.6?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 1.75 = -45.6

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-65.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +25.8

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-65.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-52.4× 25%= -13.1 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -52.4 × 25% = -13.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Türkiye, in 2025, housing and rent absorbed 29.3% of household consumption, transport 20.5%, and food and non-alcoholic beverages 17.3%. OECD also reports Turkish women spend about 5.2 times as much time as men on unpaid care and domestic work, while labour underutilization remained high. The combination shows substantial household time and cash are still required before ordinary life is secure.

For Türkiye, in 2025, housing and rent absorbed 29.3% of household consumption, transport 20.5%, and food and non-alcoholic beverages 17.3%. OECD also reports Turkish women spend about 5.2 times as much time as men on unpaid care and domestic work, while labour underutilization remained high. The combination shows substantial household time and cash are still required before ordinary life is secure.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.9× 35%= -20.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -57.9 × 35% = -20.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Türkiye, in 2025, housing and rent absorbed 29.3% of household consumption, transport 20.5%, and food and non-alcoholic beverages 17.3%. OECD also reports Turkish women spend about 5.2 times as much time as men on unpaid care and domestic work, while labour underutilization remained high. The combination shows substantial household time and cash are still required before ordinary life is secure.

For Türkiye, in 2025, housing and rent absorbed 29.3% of household consumption, transport 20.5%, and food and non-alcoholic beverages 17.3%. OECD also reports Turkish women spend about 5.2 times as much time as men on unpaid care and domestic work, while labour underutilization remained high. The combination shows substantial household time and cash are still required before ordinary life is secure.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-91.8× 25%= -23.0 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Original evidence -70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -91.8 × 25% = -23.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Türkiye, the 2025 Time Use Survey reports that women not in paid employment spent an average 4 hours 33 minutes per day on household and family care versus 1 hour 17 minutes for men not in paid employment. These figures describe non-employed respondents, not the whole population.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-63.3× 15%= -9.5 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.3 × 15% = -9.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Türkiye, in 2025, housing and rent absorbed 29.3% of household consumption, transport 20.5%, and food and non-alcoholic beverages 17.3%. OECD also reports Turkish women spend about 5.2 times as much time as men on unpaid care and domestic work, while labour underutilization remained high. The combination shows substantial household time and cash are still required before ordinary life is secure.

For Türkiye, in 2025, housing and rent absorbed 29.3% of household consumption, transport 20.5%, and food and non-alcoholic beverages 17.3%. OECD also reports Turkish women spend about 5.2 times as much time as men on unpaid care and domestic work, while labour underutilization remained high. The combination shows substantial household time and cash are still required before ordinary life is secure.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.11 + -20.25 + -22.96 + -9.49 = -65.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +25.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +25.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -65.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+25.8 Original evidence category score+25.8 Contribution to national evidence score+2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 19.25 + -17.50 + 5.25 = 25.75

Base: 25.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +25.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 25.75 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.39 points

For Türkiye, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — human-time-burden domestic evidence retained

For Türkiye, in 2025, housing and rent absorbed 29.3% of household consumption, transport 20.5%, and food and non-alcoholic beverages 17.3%. OECD also reports Turkish women spend about 5.2 times as much time as men on unpaid care and domestic work, while labour underutilization remained high. The combination shows substantial household time and cash are still required before ordinary life is secure.

2026-10-11 TÜİK — Household Consumption Expenditures 2025
Türkiye: household spending and unpaid-care burdens keep ordinary life cash-intensive

For Türkiye, in 2025, housing and rent absorbed 29.3% of household consumption, transport 20.5%, and food and non-alcoholic beverages 17.3%. OECD also reports Turkish women spend about 5.2 times as much time as men on unpaid care and domestic work, while labour underutilization remained high. The combination shows substantial household time and cash are still required before ordinary life is secure.

2026-10-05 TÜİK — Household Consumption Expenditures 2025
2026-10-21 second-batch source check - TUR - 2025 Time Use Survey: household and family care time

For Türkiye, the 2025 Time Use Survey reports that women not in paid employment spent an average 4 hours 33 minutes per day on household and family care versus 1 hour 17 minutes for men not in paid employment. These figures describe non-employed respondents, not the whole population.

Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK)
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-64.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence +30.5

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-64.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-51.1× 25%= -12.8 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -51.1 × 25% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

TÜİK reported that 31.3% of individuals experienced dwelling problems such as leaking roofs, damp or rot and 30.2% had heating problems linked to insulation. Housing and rent then rose to 29.3% of household consumption in 2025. Türkiye is simultaneously undertaking large earthquake-reconstruction and resilient-housing programmes, showing high capacity but incomplete shelter reach and durability.

TÜİK reported that 31.3% of individuals experienced dwelling problems such as leaking roofs, damp or rot and 30.2% had heating problems linked to insulation. Housing and rent then rose to 29.3% of household consumption in 2025. Türkiye is simultaneously undertaking large earthquake-reconstruction and resilient-housing programmes, showing high capacity but incomplete shelter reach and durability.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.9× 35%= -20.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -57.9 × 35% = -20.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

TÜİK reported that 31.3% of individuals experienced dwelling problems such as leaking roofs, damp or rot and 30.2% had heating problems linked to insulation. Housing and rent then rose to 29.3% of household consumption in 2025. Türkiye is simultaneously undertaking large earthquake-reconstruction and resilient-housing programmes, showing high capacity but incomplete shelter reach and durability.

TÜİK reported that 31.3% of individuals experienced dwelling problems such as leaking roofs, damp or rot and 30.2% had heating problems linked to insulation. Housing and rent then rose to 29.3% of household consumption in 2025. Türkiye is simultaneously undertaking large earthquake-reconstruction and resilient-housing programmes, showing high capacity but incomplete shelter reach and durability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-90.5× 25%= -22.6 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -90.5 × 25% = -22.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

TÜİK reported that 31.3% of individuals experienced dwelling problems such as leaking roofs, damp or rot and 30.2% had heating problems linked to insulation. Housing and rent then rose to 29.3% of household consumption in 2025. Türkiye is simultaneously undertaking large earthquake-reconstruction and resilient-housing programmes, showing high capacity but incomplete shelter reach and durability.

TÜİK reported that 31.3% of individuals experienced dwelling problems such as leaking roofs, damp or rot and 30.2% had heating problems linked to insulation. Housing and rent then rose to 29.3% of household consumption in 2025. Türkiye is simultaneously undertaking large earthquake-reconstruction and resilient-housing programmes, showing high capacity but incomplete shelter reach and durability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-59.2× 15%= -8.9 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.2 × 15% = -8.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

TÜİK reported that 31.3% of individuals experienced dwelling problems such as leaking roofs, damp or rot and 30.2% had heating problems linked to insulation. Housing and rent then rose to 29.3% of household consumption in 2025. Türkiye is simultaneously undertaking large earthquake-reconstruction and resilient-housing programmes, showing high capacity but incomplete shelter reach and durability.

TÜİK reported that 31.3% of individuals experienced dwelling problems such as leaking roofs, damp or rot and 30.2% had heating problems linked to insulation. Housing and rent then rose to 29.3% of household consumption in 2025. Türkiye is simultaneously undertaking large earthquake-reconstruction and resilient-housing programmes, showing high capacity but incomplete shelter reach and durability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.77 + -20.25 + -22.62 + -8.88 = -64.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +30.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +30.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+30.5 Original evidence category score+30.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 19.25 + -16.25 + 7.50 = 30.50

Base: 30.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +30.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 30.50 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.51 points

For Türkiye, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — housing-shelter-reach domestic evidence retained

TÜİK reported that 31.3% of individuals experienced dwelling problems such as leaking roofs, damp or rot and 30.2% had heating problems linked to insulation. Housing and rent then rose to 29.3% of household consumption in 2025. Türkiye is simultaneously undertaking large earthquake-reconstruction and resilient-housing programmes, showing high capacity but incomplete shelter reach and durability.

2026-10-11 TÜİK — Statistics on Family 2024 / housing conditions
Türkiye: large housing capacity coexists with quality problems, cost pressure and earthquake recovery

TÜİK reported that 31.3% of individuals experienced dwelling problems such as leaking roofs, damp or rot and 30.2% had heating problems linked to insulation. Housing and rent then rose to 29.3% of household consumption in 2025. Türkiye is simultaneously undertaking large earthquake-reconstruction and resilient-housing programmes, showing high capacity but incomplete shelter reach and durability.

2026-10-05 TÜİK — Statistics on Family 2024 / housing conditions
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-61.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +40.5

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-61.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-48.3× 25%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -48.3 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

WFP describes Türkiye as a country where population-wide hunger is not the dominant condition, but where access to nutritious diets is uneven and malnutrition and obesity affect some groups. WFP has supported government work around a national school-meals programme, indicating meaningful public food capacity without evidence of universal free daily nourishment outside the money gate.

WFP describes Türkiye as a country where population-wide hunger is not the dominant condition, but where access to nutritious diets is uneven and malnutrition and obesity affect some groups. WFP has supported government work around a national school-meals programme, indicating meaningful public food capacity without evidence of universal free daily nourishment outside the money gate.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-55.1× 35%= -19.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.1 × 35% = -19.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WFP describes Türkiye as a country where population-wide hunger is not the dominant condition, but where access to nutritious diets is uneven and malnutrition and obesity affect some groups. WFP has supported government work around a national school-meals programme, indicating meaningful public food capacity without evidence of universal free daily nourishment outside the money gate.

WFP describes Türkiye as a country where population-wide hunger is not the dominant condition, but where access to nutritious diets is uneven and malnutrition and obesity affect some groups. WFP has supported government work around a national school-meals programme, indicating meaningful public food capacity without evidence of universal free daily nourishment outside the money gate.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-87.8× 25%= -21.9 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.8 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WFP describes Türkiye as a country where population-wide hunger is not the dominant condition, but where access to nutritious diets is uneven and malnutrition and obesity affect some groups. WFP has supported government work around a national school-meals programme, indicating meaningful public food capacity without evidence of universal free daily nourishment outside the money gate.

WFP describes Türkiye as a country where population-wide hunger is not the dominant condition, but where access to nutritious diets is uneven and malnutrition and obesity affect some groups. WFP has supported government work around a national school-meals programme, indicating meaningful public food capacity without evidence of universal free daily nourishment outside the money gate.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-56.5× 15%= -8.5 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -56.5 × 15% = -8.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WFP describes Türkiye as a country where population-wide hunger is not the dominant condition, but where access to nutritious diets is uneven and malnutrition and obesity affect some groups. WFP has supported government work around a national school-meals programme, indicating meaningful public food capacity without evidence of universal free daily nourishment outside the money gate.

WFP describes Türkiye as a country where population-wide hunger is not the dominant condition, but where access to nutritious diets is uneven and malnutrition and obesity affect some groups. WFP has supported government work around a national school-meals programme, indicating meaningful public food capacity without evidence of universal free daily nourishment outside the money gate.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.09 + -19.30 + -21.94 + -8.48 = -61.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +40.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +40.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -61.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+40.5 Original evidence category score+40.5 Contribution to national evidence score+3.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 22.75 + -13.75 + 9.00 = 40.50

Base: 40.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +40.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 40.50 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 3.75 points

For Türkiye, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — food-nourishment-free-food domestic evidence retained

WFP describes Türkiye as a country where population-wide hunger is not the dominant condition, but where access to nutritious diets is uneven and malnutrition and obesity affect some groups. WFP has supported government work around a national school-meals programme, indicating meaningful public food capacity without evidence of universal free daily nourishment outside the money gate.

2026-10-11 WFP — Republic of Türkiye country strategic plan 2023–2026
Türkiye: strong food capacity does not yet create universal free nourishment

WFP describes Türkiye as a country where population-wide hunger is not the dominant condition, but where access to nutritious diets is uneven and malnutrition and obesity affect some groups. WFP has supported government work around a national school-meals programme, indicating meaningful public food capacity without evidence of universal free daily nourishment outside the money gate.

2026-10-05 WFP — Republic of Türkiye country strategic plan 2023–2026
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-58.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +53.3

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-58.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-48.3× 25%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -48.3 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

The 2025 WHO/UNICEF JMP report records very high basic water and sanitation coverage for Türkiye and 79% safely managed sanitation in 2024. National systems therefore provide broad physical reach, while the remaining safely managed gap, wastewater treatment, water losses and drought exposure keep the system below universal abundance.

The 2025 WHO/UNICEF JMP report records very high basic water and sanitation coverage for Türkiye and 79% safely managed sanitation in 2024. National systems therefore provide broad physical reach, while the remaining safely managed gap, wastewater treatment, water losses and drought exposure keep the system below universal abundance.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.7× 35%= -17.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

85.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 29.75 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 35% = -17.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2025 WHO/UNICEF JMP report records very high basic water and sanitation coverage for Türkiye and 79% safely managed sanitation in 2024. National systems therefore provide broad physical reach, while the remaining safely managed gap, wastewater treatment, water losses and drought exposure keep the system below universal abundance.

The 2025 WHO/UNICEF JMP report records very high basic water and sanitation coverage for Türkiye and 79% safely managed sanitation in 2024. National systems therefore provide broad physical reach, while the remaining safely managed gap, wastewater treatment, water losses and drought exposure keep the system below universal abundance.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.3× 25%= -20.6 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -82.3 × 25% = -20.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2025 WHO/UNICEF JMP report records very high basic water and sanitation coverage for Türkiye and 79% safely managed sanitation in 2024. National systems therefore provide broad physical reach, while the remaining safely managed gap, wastewater treatment, water losses and drought exposure keep the system below universal abundance.

The 2025 WHO/UNICEF JMP report records very high basic water and sanitation coverage for Türkiye and 79% safely managed sanitation in 2024. National systems therefore provide broad physical reach, while the remaining safely managed gap, wastewater treatment, water losses and drought exposure keep the system below universal abundance.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-55.1× 15%= -8.3 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.1 × 15% = -8.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The 2025 WHO/UNICEF JMP report records very high basic water and sanitation coverage for Türkiye and 79% safely managed sanitation in 2024. National systems therefore provide broad physical reach, while the remaining safely managed gap, wastewater treatment, water losses and drought exposure keep the system below universal abundance.

The 2025 WHO/UNICEF JMP report records very high basic water and sanitation coverage for Türkiye and 79% safely managed sanitation in 2024. National systems therefore provide broad physical reach, while the remaining safely managed gap, wastewater treatment, water losses and drought exposure keep the system below universal abundance.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.09 + -17.40 + -20.58 + -8.27 = -58.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +53.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +53.3. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+53.3 Original evidence category score+53.3 Contribution to national evidence score+3.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 29.75 + -8.75 + 9.75 = 53.25

Base: 53.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +53.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 53.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 3.29 points

For Türkiye, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +5.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — water-sanitation domestic evidence retained

The 2025 WHO/UNICEF JMP report records very high basic water and sanitation coverage for Türkiye and 79% safely managed sanitation in 2024. National systems therefore provide broad physical reach, while the remaining safely managed gap, wastewater treatment, water losses and drought exposure keep the system below universal abundance.

2026-10-11 WHO/UNICEF JMP — Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2024
Türkiye: broad water and sanitation reach still falls short of fully managed universal service

The 2025 WHO/UNICEF JMP report records very high basic water and sanitation coverage for Türkiye and 79% safely managed sanitation in 2024. National systems therefore provide broad physical reach, while the remaining safely managed gap, wastewater treatment, water losses and drought exposure keep the system below universal abundance.

2026-10-05 WHO/UNICEF JMP — Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2024
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-58.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence +52.8

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-58.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-47.0× 25%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

95.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 23.75 weighted points

Original evidence +95.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +95.0; Money-gated reading -47.0 × 25% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

The IEA reports that renewables supplied 43% of Türkiye’s electricity generation in 2025 and that the country has modernised energy infrastructure and expanded clean-energy capacity. At the same time, energy demand is rising, coal and imported fuels remain important, and affordability support is still needed, so abundant capacity does not remove the household money gate.

The IEA reports that renewables supplied 43% of Türkiye’s electricity generation in 2025 and that the country has modernised energy infrastructure and expanded clean-energy capacity. At the same time, energy demand is rising, coal and imported fuels remain important, and affordability support is still needed, so abundant capacity does not remove the household money gate.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.7× 35%= -17.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

85.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 29.75 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 35% = -17.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The IEA reports that renewables supplied 43% of Türkiye’s electricity generation in 2025 and that the country has modernised energy infrastructure and expanded clean-energy capacity. At the same time, energy demand is rising, coal and imported fuels remain important, and affordability support is still needed, so abundant capacity does not remove the household money gate.

The IEA reports that renewables supplied 43% of Türkiye’s electricity generation in 2025 and that the country has modernised energy infrastructure and expanded clean-energy capacity. At the same time, energy demand is rising, coal and imported fuels remain important, and affordability support is still needed, so abundant capacity does not remove the household money gate.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.0× 25%= -21.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -85.0 × 25% = -21.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The IEA reports that renewables supplied 43% of Türkiye’s electricity generation in 2025 and that the country has modernised energy infrastructure and expanded clean-energy capacity. At the same time, energy demand is rising, coal and imported fuels remain important, and affordability support is still needed, so abundant capacity does not remove the household money gate.

The IEA reports that renewables supplied 43% of Türkiye’s electricity generation in 2025 and that the country has modernised energy infrastructure and expanded clean-energy capacity. At the same time, energy demand is rising, coal and imported fuels remain important, and affordability support is still needed, so abundant capacity does not remove the household money gate.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-53.8× 15%= -8.1 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.8 × 15% = -8.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The IEA reports that renewables supplied 43% of Türkiye’s electricity generation in 2025 and that the country has modernised energy infrastructure and expanded clean-energy capacity. At the same time, energy demand is rising, coal and imported fuels remain important, and affordability support is still needed, so abundant capacity does not remove the household money gate.

The IEA reports that renewables supplied 43% of Türkiye’s electricity generation in 2025 and that the country has modernised energy infrastructure and expanded clean-energy capacity. At the same time, energy demand is rising, coal and imported fuels remain important, and affordability support is still needed, so abundant capacity does not remove the household money gate.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -11.75 + -17.40 + -21.26 + -8.06 = -58.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +52.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +52.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+52.8 Original evidence category score+52.8 Contribution to national evidence score+2.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 23.75 + 29.75 + -11.25 + 10.50 = 52.75

Base: 52.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +52.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 52.75 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.72 points

For Türkiye, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +10.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — energy-household-capability domestic evidence retained

The IEA reports that renewables supplied 43% of Türkiye’s electricity generation in 2025 and that the country has modernised energy infrastructure and expanded clean-energy capacity. At the same time, energy demand is rising, coal and imported fuels remain important, and affordability support is still needed, so abundant capacity does not remove the household money gate.

2026-10-11 IEA — Türkiye 2026 Energy Policy Review, executive summary
Türkiye: large and increasingly renewable electricity capacity still carries affordability and import friction

The IEA reports that renewables supplied 43% of Türkiye’s electricity generation in 2025 and that the country has modernised energy infrastructure and expanded clean-energy capacity. At the same time, energy demand is rising, coal and imported fuels remain important, and affordability support is still needed, so abundant capacity does not remove the household money gate.

2026-10-05 IEA — Türkiye 2026 Energy Policy Review, executive summary
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-57.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +55.3

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-57.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-48.3× 25%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -48.3 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Türkiye operates broad universal health coverage. OECD comparative data show population eligibility close to universal and relatively low out-of-pocket health spending as a share of household consumption. This gives health one of Türkiye’s strongest reach profiles, although specialist capacity, waiting time and regional differences mean care is not frictionless.

Türkiye operates broad universal health coverage. OECD comparative data show population eligibility close to universal and relatively low out-of-pocket health spending as a share of household consumption. This gives health one of Türkiye’s strongest reach profiles, although specialist capacity, waiting time and regional differences mean care is not frictionless.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.7× 35%= -17.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 1.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

85.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 29.75 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 35% = -17.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye operates broad universal health coverage. OECD comparative data show population eligibility close to universal and relatively low out-of-pocket health spending as a share of household consumption. This gives health one of Türkiye’s strongest reach profiles, although specialist capacity, waiting time and regional differences mean care is not frictionless.

Türkiye operates broad universal health coverage. OECD comparative data show population eligibility close to universal and relatively low out-of-pocket health spending as a share of household consumption. This gives health one of Türkiye’s strongest reach profiles, although specialist capacity, waiting time and regional differences mean care is not frictionless.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.0× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.0; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye operates broad universal health coverage. OECD comparative data show population eligibility close to universal and relatively low out-of-pocket health spending as a share of household consumption. This gives health one of Türkiye’s strongest reach profiles, although specialist capacity, waiting time and regional differences mean care is not frictionless.

Türkiye operates broad universal health coverage. OECD comparative data show population eligibility close to universal and relatively low out-of-pocket health spending as a share of household consumption. This gives health one of Türkiye’s strongest reach profiles, although specialist capacity, waiting time and regional differences mean care is not frictionless.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-53.8× 15%= -8.1 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.8 × 15% = -8.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye operates broad universal health coverage. OECD comparative data show population eligibility close to universal and relatively low out-of-pocket health spending as a share of household consumption. This gives health one of Türkiye’s strongest reach profiles, although specialist capacity, waiting time and regional differences mean care is not frictionless.

Türkiye operates broad universal health coverage. OECD comparative data show population eligibility close to universal and relatively low out-of-pocket health spending as a share of household consumption. This gives health one of Türkiye’s strongest reach profiles, although specialist capacity, waiting time and regional differences mean care is not frictionless.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.09 + -17.40 + -20.24 + -8.07 = -57.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +55.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +55.3. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -57.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+55.3 Original evidence category score+55.3 Contribution to national evidence score+4.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 29.75 + -7.50 + 10.50 = 55.25

Base: 55.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +55.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 55.25 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 3.98 points

For Türkiye, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +5.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — health-care-reach domestic evidence retained

Türkiye operates broad universal health coverage. OECD comparative data show population eligibility close to universal and relatively low out-of-pocket health spending as a share of household consumption. This gives health one of Türkiye’s strongest reach profiles, although specialist capacity, waiting time and regional differences mean care is not frictionless.

2026-10-11 OECD — Health at a Glance 2025: Türkiye
Türkiye: near-universal health coverage gives strong reach, with remaining service frictions

Türkiye operates broad universal health coverage. OECD comparative data show population eligibility close to universal and relatively low out-of-pocket health spending as a share of household consumption. This gives health one of Türkiye’s strongest reach profiles, although specialist capacity, waiting time and regional differences mean care is not frictionless.

2026-10-05 OECD — Health at a Glance 2025: Türkiye
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-60.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +46.8

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-60.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-48.3× 25%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -48.3 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Türkiye has broad education infrastructure and PISA 2025 science performance above the OECD average, but OECD reports that 31% of 18–24 year-olds were neither employed nor in education or training in 2025, more than twice the OECD average. Education therefore reaches widely while the conversion into stable human capability remains uneven.

Türkiye has broad education infrastructure and PISA 2025 science performance above the OECD average, but OECD reports that 31% of 18–24 year-olds were neither employed nor in education or training in 2025, more than twice the OECD average. Education therefore reaches widely while the conversion into stable human capability remains uneven.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-52.4× 35%= -18.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -52.4 × 35% = -18.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye has broad education infrastructure and PISA 2025 science performance above the OECD average, but OECD reports that 31% of 18–24 year-olds were neither employed nor in education or training in 2025, more than twice the OECD average. Education therefore reaches widely while the conversion into stable human capability remains uneven.

Türkiye has broad education infrastructure and PISA 2025 science performance above the OECD average, but OECD reports that 31% of 18–24 year-olds were neither employed nor in education or training in 2025, more than twice the OECD average. Education therefore reaches widely while the conversion into stable human capability remains uneven.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-86.4× 25%= -21.6 points
Exact point calculation

-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points

Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.0; Money-gated reading -86.4 × 25% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye has broad education infrastructure and PISA 2025 science performance above the OECD average, but OECD reports that 31% of 18–24 year-olds were neither employed nor in education or training in 2025, more than twice the OECD average. Education therefore reaches widely while the conversion into stable human capability remains uneven.

Türkiye has broad education infrastructure and PISA 2025 science performance above the OECD average, but OECD reports that 31% of 18–24 year-olds were neither employed nor in education or training in 2025, more than twice the OECD average. Education therefore reaches widely while the conversion into stable human capability remains uneven.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-53.8× 15%= -8.1 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.8 × 15% = -8.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye has broad education infrastructure and PISA 2025 science performance above the OECD average, but OECD reports that 31% of 18–24 year-olds were neither employed nor in education or training in 2025, more than twice the OECD average. Education therefore reaches widely while the conversion into stable human capability remains uneven.

Türkiye has broad education infrastructure and PISA 2025 science performance above the OECD average, but OECD reports that 31% of 18–24 year-olds were neither employed nor in education or training in 2025, more than twice the OECD average. Education therefore reaches widely while the conversion into stable human capability remains uneven.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.09 + -18.35 + -21.60 + -8.07 = -60.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +46.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +46.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -60.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+46.8 Original evidence category score+46.8 Contribution to national evidence score+2.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 26.25 + -12.50 + 10.50 = 46.75

Base: 46.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +46.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 46.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.89 points

For Türkiye, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — education-human-capability domestic evidence retained

Türkiye has broad education infrastructure and PISA 2025 science performance above the OECD average, but OECD reports that 31% of 18–24 year-olds were neither employed nor in education or training in 2025, more than twice the OECD average. Education therefore reaches widely while the conversion into stable human capability remains uneven.

2026-10-11 OECD — Education at a Glance 2026: Türkiye
Türkiye: broad education reach is weakened by a very high youth NEET rate

Türkiye has broad education infrastructure and PISA 2025 science performance above the OECD average, but OECD reports that 31% of 18–24 year-olds were neither employed nor in education or training in 2025, more than twice the OECD average. Education therefore reaches widely while the conversion into stable human capability remains uneven.

2026-10-05 OECD — Education at a Glance 2026: Türkiye
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-62.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +37.8

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-62.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-49.7× 25%= -12.4 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 25% = -12.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Türkiye has extensive national roads, railways, airports and major-city transit systems, yet mobility carries substantial cost and safety friction. TÜİK recorded 6,035 road deaths in 2025 when deaths at the scene and within 30 days are combined, while transport took 20.5% of household consumption expenditure in 2025.

Türkiye has extensive national roads, railways, airports and major-city transit systems, yet mobility carries substantial cost and safety friction. TÜİK recorded 6,035 road deaths in 2025 when deaths at the scene and within 30 days are combined, while transport took 20.5% of household consumption expenditure in 2025.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-55.1× 35%= -19.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.1 × 35% = -19.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye has extensive national roads, railways, airports and major-city transit systems, yet mobility carries substantial cost and safety friction. TÜİK recorded 6,035 road deaths in 2025 when deaths at the scene and within 30 days are combined, while transport took 20.5% of household consumption expenditure in 2025.

Türkiye has extensive national roads, railways, airports and major-city transit systems, yet mobility carries substantial cost and safety friction. TÜİK recorded 6,035 road deaths in 2025 when deaths at the scene and within 30 days are combined, while transport took 20.5% of household consumption expenditure in 2025.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-87.8× 25%= -21.9 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.8 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye has extensive national roads, railways, airports and major-city transit systems, yet mobility carries substantial cost and safety friction. TÜİK recorded 6,035 road deaths in 2025 when deaths at the scene and within 30 days are combined, while transport took 20.5% of household consumption expenditure in 2025.

Türkiye has extensive national roads, railways, airports and major-city transit systems, yet mobility carries substantial cost and safety friction. TÜİK recorded 6,035 road deaths in 2025 when deaths at the scene and within 30 days are combined, while transport took 20.5% of household consumption expenditure in 2025.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-59.2× 15%= -8.9 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.2 × 15% = -8.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye has extensive national roads, railways, airports and major-city transit systems, yet mobility carries substantial cost and safety friction. TÜİK recorded 6,035 road deaths in 2025 when deaths at the scene and within 30 days are combined, while transport took 20.5% of household consumption expenditure in 2025.

Türkiye has extensive national roads, railways, airports and major-city transit systems, yet mobility carries substantial cost and safety friction. TÜİK recorded 6,035 road deaths in 2025 when deaths at the scene and within 30 days are combined, while transport took 20.5% of household consumption expenditure in 2025.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.43 + -19.30 + -21.94 + -8.88 = -62.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +37.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +37.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -62.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+37.8 Original evidence category score+37.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 22.75 + -13.75 + 7.50 = 37.75

Base: 37.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +37.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 37.75 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.55 points

For Türkiye, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — mobility-reachability domestic evidence retained

Türkiye has extensive national roads, railways, airports and major-city transit systems, yet mobility carries substantial cost and safety friction. TÜİK recorded 6,035 road deaths in 2025 when deaths at the scene and within 30 days are combined, while transport took 20.5% of household consumption expenditure in 2025.

2026-10-11 TÜİK — Road Traffic Accident Statistics 2025
Türkiye: extensive transport capacity carries major household cost and road-safety friction

Türkiye has extensive national roads, railways, airports and major-city transit systems, yet mobility carries substantial cost and safety friction. TÜİK recorded 6,035 road deaths in 2025 when deaths at the scene and within 30 days are combined, while transport took 20.5% of household consumption expenditure in 2025.

2026-10-05 TÜİK — Road Traffic Accident Statistics 2025
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-63.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence +34.5

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-63.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-51.1× 25%= -12.8 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -51.1 × 25% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Türkiye remains strongly family-oriented, but the total fertility rate was 1.48 children per woman in 2025, far below replacement. Household size fell to 3.08 and one-person households reached 20.5%, while 193,793 couples divorced in 2025. The evidence suggests family attachment remains strong but material and social continuity is under pressure.

Türkiye remains strongly family-oriented, but the total fertility rate was 1.48 children per woman in 2025, far below replacement. Household size fell to 3.08 and one-person households reached 20.5%, while 193,793 couples divorced in 2025. The evidence suggests family attachment remains strong but material and social continuity is under pressure.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-55.1× 35%= -19.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.1 × 35% = -19.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye remains strongly family-oriented, but the total fertility rate was 1.48 children per woman in 2025, far below replacement. Household size fell to 3.08 and one-person households reached 20.5%, while 193,793 couples divorced in 2025. The evidence suggests family attachment remains strong but material and social continuity is under pressure.

Türkiye remains strongly family-oriented, but the total fertility rate was 1.48 children per woman in 2025, far below replacement. Household size fell to 3.08 and one-person households reached 20.5%, while 193,793 couples divorced in 2025. The evidence suggests family attachment remains strong but material and social continuity is under pressure.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-89.1× 25%= -22.3 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -89.1 × 25% = -22.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye remains strongly family-oriented, but the total fertility rate was 1.48 children per woman in 2025, far below replacement. Household size fell to 3.08 and one-person households reached 20.5%, while 193,793 couples divorced in 2025. The evidence suggests family attachment remains strong but material and social continuity is under pressure.

Türkiye remains strongly family-oriented, but the total fertility rate was 1.48 children per woman in 2025, far below replacement. Household size fell to 3.08 and one-person households reached 20.5%, while 193,793 couples divorced in 2025. The evidence suggests family attachment remains strong but material and social continuity is under pressure.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-60.6× 15%= -9.1 points
Exact point calculation

45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points

Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -60.6 × 15% = -9.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye remains strongly family-oriented, but the total fertility rate was 1.48 children per woman in 2025, far below replacement. Household size fell to 3.08 and one-person households reached 20.5%, while 193,793 couples divorced in 2025. The evidence suggests family attachment remains strong but material and social continuity is under pressure.

Türkiye remains strongly family-oriented, but the total fertility rate was 1.48 children per woman in 2025, far below replacement. Household size fell to 3.08 and one-person households reached 20.5%, while 193,793 couples divorced in 2025. The evidence suggests family attachment remains strong but material and social continuity is under pressure.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.77 + -19.30 + -22.28 + -9.09 = -63.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +34.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +34.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+34.5 Original evidence category score+34.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 22.75 + -15.00 + 6.75 = 34.50

Base: 34.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +34.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 34.50 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.84 points

For Türkiye, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +34.5

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: +34.5 − 0 = +34.5 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Turkey: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded in the cited legal-status review as of 2026-10-09. This is a legal-classification reading only; it does not prove demographic causation.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2026-10-09 (access date) · Reviewed: 2026-10-09

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — family-formation-stability domestic evidence retained

Türkiye remains strongly family-oriented, but the total fertility rate was 1.48 children per woman in 2025, far below replacement. Household size fell to 3.08 and one-person households reached 20.5%, while 193,793 couples divorced in 2025. The evidence suggests family attachment remains strong but material and social continuity is under pressure.

2026-10-11 TÜİK — Women in Türkiye: A Statistical Overview 2025
Türkiye: family remains central while fertility and household continuity weaken

Türkiye remains strongly family-oriented, but the total fertility rate was 1.48 children per woman in 2025, far below replacement. Household size fell to 3.08 and one-person households reached 20.5%, while 193,793 couples divorced in 2025. The evidence suggests family attachment remains strong but material and social continuity is under pressure.

2026-10-05 TÜİK — Women in Türkiye: A Statistical Overview 2025
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-62.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +38.8

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-62.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-48.3× 25%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -48.3 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Türkiye has substantial physical land capacity: about half of land is agricultural and 29% forest, while 89% of the population lived in urban areas in 2024. The country therefore has extensive productive ground, but ordinary access to well-located housing, farmland and urban opportunity is still largely mediated through ownership, rent, finance and market price.

Türkiye has substantial physical land capacity: about half of land is agricultural and 29% forest, while 89% of the population lived in urban areas in 2024. The country therefore has extensive productive ground, but ordinary access to well-located housing, farmland and urban opportunity is still largely mediated through ownership, rent, finance and market price.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-56.5× 35%= -19.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.25/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -56.5 × 35% = -19.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye has substantial physical land capacity: about half of land is agricultural and 29% forest, while 89% of the population lived in urban areas in 2024. The country therefore has extensive productive ground, but ordinary access to well-located housing, farmland and urban opportunity is still largely mediated through ownership, rent, finance and market price.

Türkiye has substantial physical land capacity: about half of land is agricultural and 29% forest, while 89% of the population lived in urban areas in 2024. The country therefore has extensive productive ground, but ordinary access to well-located housing, farmland and urban opportunity is still largely mediated through ownership, rent, finance and market price.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-87.8× 25%= -21.9 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.8 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye has substantial physical land capacity: about half of land is agricultural and 29% forest, while 89% of the population lived in urban areas in 2024. The country therefore has extensive productive ground, but ordinary access to well-located housing, farmland and urban opportunity is still largely mediated through ownership, rent, finance and market price.

Türkiye has substantial physical land capacity: about half of land is agricultural and 29% forest, while 89% of the population lived in urban areas in 2024. The country therefore has extensive productive ground, but ordinary access to well-located housing, farmland and urban opportunity is still largely mediated through ownership, rent, finance and market price.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-56.5× 15%= -8.5 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -56.5 × 15% = -8.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye has substantial physical land capacity: about half of land is agricultural and 29% forest, while 89% of the population lived in urban areas in 2024. The country therefore has extensive productive ground, but ordinary access to well-located housing, farmland and urban opportunity is still largely mediated through ownership, rent, finance and market price.

Türkiye has substantial physical land capacity: about half of land is agricultural and 29% forest, while 89% of the population lived in urban areas in 2024. The country therefore has extensive productive ground, but ordinary access to well-located housing, farmland and urban opportunity is still largely mediated through ownership, rent, finance and market price.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.09 + -19.78 + -21.94 + -8.47 = -62.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +38.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +38.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -62.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+38.8 Original evidence category score+38.8 Contribution to national evidence score+2.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 21.00 + -13.75 + 9.00 = 38.75

Base: 38.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +38.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 38.75 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.99 points

For Türkiye, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +30.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — land-spatial-freedom domestic evidence retained

Türkiye has substantial physical land capacity: about half of land is agricultural and 29% forest, while 89% of the population lived in urban areas in 2024. The country therefore has extensive productive ground, but ordinary access to well-located housing, farmland and urban opportunity is still largely mediated through ownership, rent, finance and market price.

2026-10-11 UN-Water SDG 6 Data — Türkiye country profile
Türkiye: large productive land capacity is concentrated behind urban and market access

Türkiye has substantial physical land capacity: about half of land is agricultural and 29% forest, while 89% of the population lived in urban areas in 2024. The country therefore has extensive productive ground, but ordinary access to well-located housing, farmland and urban opportunity is still largely mediated through ownership, rent, finance and market price.

2026-10-05 UN-Water SDG 6 Data — Türkiye country profile
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-59.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +50.5

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-59.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-48.3× 25%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 22.50 weighted points

Original evidence +90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +90.0; Money-gated reading -48.3 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Türkiye had 664 museums in 2025 and museum and archaeological-site visits reached about 65.9 million. The Culture Ministry also maintains free public libraries, free internet/computer use in those libraries, and a list of museum and archaeological sites with free entry. These are genuine public-life abundance assets, though much cinema, music, tourism and leisure remains ticketed or subscription-based.

Türkiye had 664 museums in 2025 and museum and archaeological-site visits reached about 65.9 million. The Culture Ministry also maintains free public libraries, free internet/computer use in those libraries, and a list of museum and archaeological sites with free entry. These are genuine public-life abundance assets, though much cinema, music, tourism and leisure remains ticketed or subscription-based.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-52.4× 35%= -18.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -52.4 × 35% = -18.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye had 664 museums in 2025 and museum and archaeological-site visits reached about 65.9 million. The Culture Ministry also maintains free public libraries, free internet/computer use in those libraries, and a list of museum and archaeological sites with free entry. These are genuine public-life abundance assets, though much cinema, music, tourism and leisure remains ticketed or subscription-based.

Türkiye had 664 museums in 2025 and museum and archaeological-site visits reached about 65.9 million. The Culture Ministry also maintains free public libraries, free internet/computer use in those libraries, and a list of museum and archaeological sites with free entry. These are genuine public-life abundance assets, though much cinema, music, tourism and leisure remains ticketed or subscription-based.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-82.3× 25%= -20.6 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -82.3 × 25% = -20.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye had 664 museums in 2025 and museum and archaeological-site visits reached about 65.9 million. The Culture Ministry also maintains free public libraries, free internet/computer use in those libraries, and a list of museum and archaeological sites with free entry. These are genuine public-life abundance assets, though much cinema, music, tourism and leisure remains ticketed or subscription-based.

Türkiye had 664 museums in 2025 and museum and archaeological-site visits reached about 65.9 million. The Culture Ministry also maintains free public libraries, free internet/computer use in those libraries, and a list of museum and archaeological sites with free entry. These are genuine public-life abundance assets, though much cinema, music, tourism and leisure remains ticketed or subscription-based.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-53.8× 15%= -8.1 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.8 × 15% = -8.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye had 664 museums in 2025 and museum and archaeological-site visits reached about 65.9 million. The Culture Ministry also maintains free public libraries, free internet/computer use in those libraries, and a list of museum and archaeological sites with free entry. These are genuine public-life abundance assets, though much cinema, music, tourism and leisure remains ticketed or subscription-based.

Türkiye had 664 museums in 2025 and museum and archaeological-site visits reached about 65.9 million. The Culture Ministry also maintains free public libraries, free internet/computer use in those libraries, and a list of museum and archaeological sites with free entry. These are genuine public-life abundance assets, though much cinema, music, tourism and leisure remains ticketed or subscription-based.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.09 + -18.35 + -20.58 + -8.07 = -59.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +50.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +50.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -59.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+50.5 Original evidence category score+50.5 Contribution to national evidence score+3.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 22.50 + 26.25 + -8.75 + 10.50 = 50.50

Base: 50.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +50.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 50.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 3.12 points

For Türkiye, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — peace-beauty-delight domestic evidence retained

Türkiye had 664 museums in 2025 and museum and archaeological-site visits reached about 65.9 million. The Culture Ministry also maintains free public libraries, free internet/computer use in those libraries, and a list of museum and archaeological sites with free entry. These are genuine public-life abundance assets, though much cinema, music, tourism and leisure remains ticketed or subscription-based.

2026-10-11 TÜİK — Cultural Heritage Statistics 2025
Türkiye: museums, libraries and public culture provide real free-access islands inside a paid leisure economy

Türkiye had 664 museums in 2025 and museum and archaeological-site visits reached about 65.9 million. The Culture Ministry also maintains free public libraries, free internet/computer use in those libraries, and a list of museum and archaeological sites with free entry. These are genuine public-life abundance assets, though much cinema, music, tourism and leisure remains ticketed or subscription-based.

2026-10-05 TÜİK — Cultural Heritage Statistics 2025
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-61.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +40.0

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-61.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-49.7× 25%= -12.4 points
Exact point calculation

85.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.25 weighted points

Original evidence +85.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +85.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 25% = -12.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Türkiye retains large forest, agricultural and protected landscapes and continues afforestation and protected-area programmes. OECD nevertheless identifies major climate, air-quality, freshwater, waste and biodiversity pressures, while the 2023 earthquakes and recurring wildfires show the scale of resilience demands. Active reconstruction and ecosystem investment improve return but do not erase those risks.

Türkiye retains large forest, agricultural and protected landscapes and continues afforestation and protected-area programmes. OECD nevertheless identifies major climate, air-quality, freshwater, waste and biodiversity pressures, while the 2023 earthquakes and recurring wildfires show the scale of resilience demands. Active reconstruction and ecosystem investment improve return but do not erase those risks.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-55.1× 35%= -19.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

65.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.1 × 35% = -19.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye retains large forest, agricultural and protected landscapes and continues afforestation and protected-area programmes. OECD nevertheless identifies major climate, air-quality, freshwater, waste and biodiversity pressures, while the 2023 earthquakes and recurring wildfires show the scale of resilience demands. Active reconstruction and ecosystem investment improve return but do not erase those risks.

Türkiye retains large forest, agricultural and protected landscapes and continues afforestation and protected-area programmes. OECD nevertheless identifies major climate, air-quality, freshwater, waste and biodiversity pressures, while the 2023 earthquakes and recurring wildfires show the scale of resilience demands. Active reconstruction and ecosystem investment improve return but do not erase those risks.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-87.8× 25%= -21.9 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.8 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye retains large forest, agricultural and protected landscapes and continues afforestation and protected-area programmes. OECD nevertheless identifies major climate, air-quality, freshwater, waste and biodiversity pressures, while the 2023 earthquakes and recurring wildfires show the scale of resilience demands. Active reconstruction and ecosystem investment improve return but do not erase those risks.

Türkiye retains large forest, agricultural and protected landscapes and continues afforestation and protected-area programmes. OECD nevertheless identifies major climate, air-quality, freshwater, waste and biodiversity pressures, while the 2023 earthquakes and recurring wildfires show the scale of resilience demands. Active reconstruction and ecosystem investment improve return but do not erase those risks.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-55.1× 15%= -8.3 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.75 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -55.1 × 15% = -8.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye retains large forest, agricultural and protected landscapes and continues afforestation and protected-area programmes. OECD nevertheless identifies major climate, air-quality, freshwater, waste and biodiversity pressures, while the 2023 earthquakes and recurring wildfires show the scale of resilience demands. Active reconstruction and ecosystem investment improve return but do not erase those risks.

Türkiye retains large forest, agricultural and protected landscapes and continues afforestation and protected-area programmes. OECD nevertheless identifies major climate, air-quality, freshwater, waste and biodiversity pressures, while the 2023 earthquakes and recurring wildfires show the scale of resilience demands. Active reconstruction and ecosystem investment improve return but do not erase those risks.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.43 + -19.30 + -21.94 + -8.27 = -61.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +40.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +40.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -61.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+40.0 Original evidence category score+40.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 21.25 + 22.75 + -13.75 + 9.75 = 40.00

Base: 40.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +40.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 40.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.47 points

For Türkiye, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — living-ground-resilience domestic evidence retained

Türkiye retains large forest, agricultural and protected landscapes and continues afforestation and protected-area programmes. OECD nevertheless identifies major climate, air-quality, freshwater, waste and biodiversity pressures, while the 2023 earthquakes and recurring wildfires show the scale of resilience demands. Active reconstruction and ecosystem investment improve return but do not erase those risks.

2026-10-11 OECD — Environment at a Glance: Türkiye
Türkiye: large living-ground capacity faces earthquake, wildfire, drought and ecological pressure

Türkiye retains large forest, agricultural and protected landscapes and continues afforestation and protected-area programmes. OECD nevertheless identifies major climate, air-quality, freshwater, waste and biodiversity pressures, while the 2023 earthquakes and recurring wildfires show the scale of resilience demands. Active reconstruction and ecosystem investment improve return but do not erase those risks.

2026-10-05 OECD — Environment at a Glance: Türkiye
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-66.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +22.8

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-66.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-53.8× 25%= -13.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.8 × 25% = -13.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

The World Justice Project gave Türkiye an overall rule-of-law score of 0.41 and ranked it 118th of 143 countries in 2025. Its Order and Security factor was stronger at 0.71 and rank 79, showing that physical order and institutional rule-of-law reach do not move together. The resulting institutional friction materially reduces usable justice and confidence.

The World Justice Project gave Türkiye an overall rule-of-law score of 0.41 and ranked it 118th of 143 countries in 2025. Its Order and Security factor was stronger at 0.71 and rank 79, showing that physical order and institutional rule-of-law reach do not move together. The resulting institutional friction materially reduces usable justice and confidence.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-59.2× 35%= -20.7 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.2 × 35% = -20.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The World Justice Project gave Türkiye an overall rule-of-law score of 0.41 and ranked it 118th of 143 countries in 2025. Its Order and Security factor was stronger at 0.71 and rank 79, showing that physical order and institutional rule-of-law reach do not move together. The resulting institutional friction materially reduces usable justice and confidence.

The World Justice Project gave Türkiye an overall rule-of-law score of 0.41 and ranked it 118th of 143 countries in 2025. Its Order and Security factor was stronger at 0.71 and rank 79, showing that physical order and institutional rule-of-law reach do not move together. The resulting institutional friction materially reduces usable justice and confidence.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-91.8× 25%= -23.0 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Original evidence -70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -91.8 × 25% = -23.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The World Justice Project gave Türkiye an overall rule-of-law score of 0.41 and ranked it 118th of 143 countries in 2025. Its Order and Security factor was stronger at 0.71 and rank 79, showing that physical order and institutional rule-of-law reach do not move together. The resulting institutional friction materially reduces usable justice and confidence.

The World Justice Project gave Türkiye an overall rule-of-law score of 0.41 and ranked it 118th of 143 countries in 2025. Its Order and Security factor was stronger at 0.71 and rank 79, showing that physical order and institutional rule-of-law reach do not move together. The resulting institutional friction materially reduces usable justice and confidence.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-63.3× 15%= -9.5 points
Exact point calculation

35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points

Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -63.3 × 15% = -9.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The World Justice Project gave Türkiye an overall rule-of-law score of 0.41 and ranked it 118th of 143 countries in 2025. Its Order and Security factor was stronger at 0.71 and rank 79, showing that physical order and institutional rule-of-law reach do not move together. The resulting institutional friction materially reduces usable justice and confidence.

The World Justice Project gave Türkiye an overall rule-of-law score of 0.41 and ranked it 118th of 143 countries in 2025. Its Order and Security factor was stronger at 0.71 and rank 79, showing that physical order and institutional rule-of-law reach do not move together. The resulting institutional friction materially reduces usable justice and confidence.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.45 + -20.73 + -22.96 + -9.49 = -66.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +22.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +22.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -66.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+22.8 Original evidence category score+22.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + -17.50 + 5.25 = 22.75

Base: 22.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +22.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 22.75 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.17 points

For Türkiye, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — justice-safety-friction domestic evidence retained

The World Justice Project gave Türkiye an overall rule-of-law score of 0.41 and ranked it 118th of 143 countries in 2025. Its Order and Security factor was stronger at 0.71 and rank 79, showing that physical order and institutional rule-of-law reach do not move together. The resulting institutional friction materially reduces usable justice and confidence.

2026-10-11 World Justice Project — Rule of Law Index 2025: Türkiye
Türkiye: physical order is stronger than overall rule-of-law reach

The World Justice Project gave Türkiye an overall rule-of-law score of 0.41 and ranked it 118th of 143 countries in 2025. Its Order and Security factor was stronger at 0.71 and rank 79, showing that physical order and institutional rule-of-law reach do not move together. The resulting institutional friction materially reduces usable justice and confidence.

2026-10-05 World Justice Project — Rule of Law Index 2025: Türkiye
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-64.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +29.3

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-64.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-51.1× 25%= -12.8 points
Exact point calculation

80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points

Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -51.1 × 25% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Türkiye has substantial waste collection and industrial processing capacity, but TÜİK reports that 85.1% of total waste covered by the statistics was disposed of in spoil areas, tailings dams or regular storage facilities in 2024, while only a small share was recovered through other routes. OECD likewise notes that most municipal waste still goes to landfill, leaving large room for repair, reuse and circular return.

Türkiye has substantial waste collection and industrial processing capacity, but TÜİK reports that 85.1% of total waste covered by the statistics was disposed of in spoil areas, tailings dams or regular storage facilities in 2024, while only a small share was recovered through other routes. OECD likewise notes that most municipal waste still goes to landfill, leaving large room for repair, reuse and circular return.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.9× 35%= -20.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points

Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -57.9 × 35% = -20.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye has substantial waste collection and industrial processing capacity, but TÜİK reports that 85.1% of total waste covered by the statistics was disposed of in spoil areas, tailings dams or regular storage facilities in 2024, while only a small share was recovered through other routes. OECD likewise notes that most municipal waste still goes to landfill, leaving large room for repair, reuse and circular return.

Türkiye has substantial waste collection and industrial processing capacity, but TÜİK reports that 85.1% of total waste covered by the statistics was disposed of in spoil areas, tailings dams or regular storage facilities in 2024, while only a small share was recovered through other routes. OECD likewise notes that most municipal waste still goes to landfill, leaving large room for repair, reuse and circular return.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-91.8× 25%= -23.0 points
Exact point calculation

-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points

Original evidence -70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -91.8 × 25% = -23.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye has substantial waste collection and industrial processing capacity, but TÜİK reports that 85.1% of total waste covered by the statistics was disposed of in spoil areas, tailings dams or regular storage facilities in 2024, while only a small share was recovered through other routes. OECD likewise notes that most municipal waste still goes to landfill, leaving large room for repair, reuse and circular return.

Türkiye has substantial waste collection and industrial processing capacity, but TÜİK reports that 85.1% of total waste covered by the statistics was disposed of in spoil areas, tailings dams or regular storage facilities in 2024, while only a small share was recovered through other routes. OECD likewise notes that most municipal waste still goes to landfill, leaving large room for repair, reuse and circular return.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-59.2× 15%= -8.9 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -59.2 × 15% = -8.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Türkiye has substantial waste collection and industrial processing capacity, but TÜİK reports that 85.1% of total waste covered by the statistics was disposed of in spoil areas, tailings dams or regular storage facilities in 2024, while only a small share was recovered through other routes. OECD likewise notes that most municipal waste still goes to landfill, leaving large room for repair, reuse and circular return.

Türkiye has substantial waste collection and industrial processing capacity, but TÜİK reports that 85.1% of total waste covered by the statistics was disposed of in spoil areas, tailings dams or regular storage facilities in 2024, while only a small share was recovered through other routes. OECD likewise notes that most municipal waste still goes to landfill, leaving large room for repair, reuse and circular return.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.77 + -20.25 + -22.96 + -8.88 = -64.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +29.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +29.3. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+29.3 Original evidence category score+29.3 Contribution to national evidence score+1.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 20.00 + 19.25 + -17.50 + 7.50 = 29.25

Base: 29.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +29.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 29.25 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.20 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

For Türkiye, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — durability-material-return domestic evidence retained

Türkiye has substantial waste collection and industrial processing capacity, but TÜİK reports that 85.1% of total waste covered by the statistics was disposed of in spoil areas, tailings dams or regular storage facilities in 2024, while only a small share was recovered through other routes. OECD likewise notes that most municipal waste still goes to landfill, leaving large room for repair, reuse and circular return.

2026-10-11 TÜİK — Waste Statistics 2024
Türkiye: waste systems collect at scale but disposal still dominates material return

Türkiye has substantial waste collection and industrial processing capacity, but TÜİK reports that 85.1% of total waste covered by the statistics was disposed of in spoil areas, tailings dams or regular storage facilities in 2024, while only a small share was recovered through other routes. OECD likewise notes that most municipal waste still goes to landfill, leaving large room for repair, reuse and circular return.

2026-10-05 TÜİK — Waste Statistics 2024
6% weight International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
-60.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +46.3

International score breakdown

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

-60.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Entry Accessibility 25%
See all nine International Welcome Entry Accessibility scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-57.6× 25%= -14.4 points
Exact point calculation

56.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 14.00 weighted points

Original evidence +56.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +56.0; Money-gated reading -57.6 × 25% = -14.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Türkiye's government publishes eligibility for an electronic visa, a paid conditional visitor procedure distinct from visa-free entry.

Türkiye continued to host one of the world’s largest refugee populations, with about 2.6 million refugees by mid-2025, including roughly 2.5 million Syrians under temporary protection, alongside international-protection applicants and status-holders. Refugees can access national education, health and social systems through regulated status, while entry, registration, work and residence remain document- and rule-governed. This policy category is factual and unscored.

🤔
Migrant Practical Life 30%
See all nine International Welcome Migrant Practical Life scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-65.7× 30%= -19.7 points
Exact point calculation

26.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 7.80 weighted points

Original evidence +26.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +26.0; Money-gated reading -65.7 × 30% = -19.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Türkiye, uNHCR documents protection programmes and extensive refugee populations; access to routine public life is unequal.

🤔
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome 25%
See all nine International Welcome Refugee / Neighbour Welcome scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-50.5× 25%= -12.6 points
Exact point calculation

82.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.50 weighted points

Original evidence +82.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +82.0; Money-gated reading -50.5 × 25% = -12.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Türkiye hosts millions of refugees and people under temporary protection, a large material reception burden recorded by UNHCR.

🤔
Flexibility / Continuity 20%
See all nine International Welcome Flexibility / Continuity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-67.4× 20%= -13.5 points
Exact point calculation

20.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 4.00 weighted points

Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -67.4 × 20% = -13.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Türkiye, uNHCR describes temporary-protection rules and adjustments, including healthcare contribution changes, which can affect long-term family stability.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -14.40 + -19.72 + -12.63 + -13.48 = -60.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +46.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +46.3. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -60.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+46.3 Original evidence category score+46.3 Contribution to national evidence score+2.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 14.00 + 7.80 + 20.50 + 4.00 = 46.30

Base: 46.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +46.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 46.30 × (6.00 × 76.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 2.17 points

For Türkiye, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 76% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.56%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — Flexibility / Continuity (international-access-human-welcome)

For Türkiye, uNHCR describes temporary-protection rules and adjustments, including healthcare contribution changes, which can affect long-term family stability.

2026-10-11 UNHCR Türkiye temporary protection information
2026 full review — Türkiye — Refugee / Neighbour Welcome (international-access-human-welcome)

Türkiye hosts millions of refugees and people under temporary protection, a large material reception burden recorded by UNHCR.

2026-10-11 UNHCR Türkiye 2025 operation
2026 full review — Türkiye — Migrant Practical Life (international-access-human-welcome)

For Türkiye, uNHCR documents protection programmes and extensive refugee populations; access to routine public life is unequal.

2026-10-11 UNHCR Türkiye country operation
2026 full review — Türkiye — Entry Accessibility (international-access-human-welcome)

Türkiye's government publishes eligibility for an electronic visa, a paid conditional visitor procedure distinct from visa-free entry.

2026-10-11 Republic of Türkiye eVisa authority
Türkiye: large refugee-hosting system combines real inclusion with regulated access

Türkiye continued to host one of the world’s largest refugee populations, with about 2.6 million refugees by mid-2025, including roughly 2.5 million Syrians under temporary protection, alongside international-protection applicants and status-holders. Refugees can access national education, health and social systems through regulated status, while entry, registration, work and residence remain document- and rule-governed. This policy category is factual and unscored.

2026-10-05 UNHCR — Republic of Türkiye
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-64.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence +30.5

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-64.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Positive Contribution 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-53.8× 25%= -13.5 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.8 × 25% = -13.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Türkiye's cooperation agency TİKA records international programmes and thousands of projects in multiple partner countries.

WFP describes Türkiye as an important humanitarian logistics and emergency-response partner and plans to use the country’s location and supply-chain capacity to support global food-security operations. At the same time, OECD and IEA evidence shows continuing fossil-fuel and emissions pressures. This external-footprint category records both contribution and burden factually and remains unscored.

🤔
Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-61.9× 25%= -15.5 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 10.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -61.9 × 25% = -15.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Türkiye, overseas education and infrastructure projects are documented, but recipient control and lasting household gain need project-specific confirmation.

🤔
Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-72.8× 35%= -25.5 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -72.8 × 35% = -25.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Türkiye, official project descriptions alone are not independent evidence of either zero overseas harm or quantified extraction.

🤔
Accountability / Repair 15%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-67.4× 15%= -10.1 points
Exact point calculation

20.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.00 weighted points

Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -67.4 × 15% = -10.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Türkiye, tİKA project information provides a partial public account; independently assessed remedies for project harms are not comprehensively documented.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.45 + -15.49 + -25.49 + -10.09 = -64.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +30.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +30.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+30.5 Original evidence category score+30.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 17.50 + 10.00 + 0.00 + 3.00 = 30.50

Base: 30.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +30.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 30.50 × (6.00 × 76.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.43 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Exported waste / garbageAudit pending
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

For Türkiye, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 76% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.56%. After normalization across Türkiye’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Türkiye — Accountability / Repair (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For Türkiye, tİKA project information provides a partial public account; independently assessed remedies for project harms are not comprehensively documented.

2026-10-11 TİKA official activities
2026 full review — Türkiye — Documented Harm / Extraction (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For Türkiye, official project descriptions alone are not independent evidence of either zero overseas harm or quantified extraction.

2026-10-11 TİKA official programmes
2026 full review — Türkiye — Mutuality / Local Benefit (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For Türkiye, overseas education and infrastructure projects are documented, but recipient control and lasting household gain need project-specific confirmation.

2026-10-11 TİKA project activity register
2026 full review — Türkiye — Positive Contribution (external-footprint-non-extractive)

Türkiye's cooperation agency TİKA records international programmes and thousands of projects in multiple partner countries.

2026-10-11 TİKA official activities
Türkiye: humanitarian logistics capacity creates external contribution alongside fossil and emissions burdens

WFP describes Türkiye as an important humanitarian logistics and emergency-response partner and plans to use the country’s location and supply-chain capacity to support global food-security operations. At the same time, OECD and IEA evidence shows continuing fossil-fuel and emissions pressures. This external-footprint category records both contribution and burden factually and remains unscored.

2026-10-05 WFP — Republic of Türkiye country strategic plan 2026–2028

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.