Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Burkina Faso 🇧🇫

Burkina Faso currently ranks #202 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -73.07. This country is money-gated (2.00/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Land and weakest in Justice across 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Data updatedEvidence through 13 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-73.1
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: -2.1 · Money Gate: 2.00/20 · Headline: -73.1.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#202of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

Burkina FasoLast recorded move: down from #201 to #202.Recent recorded movements
  1. #201 → #20221 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500
  2. #200 → #20121 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500
  3. #189 → #20020 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #189 → #19220 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 78: rank 201. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 78: rank 204. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 78: rank 210. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 78: rank 210. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 9 Oct 2026 · 07:51 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 78: rank 209. 9 Oct 2026 · 12:04 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 78: rank 209. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 78: rank 208. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 78: rank 207. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 78: rank 208. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 78: rank 207. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 78: rank 206. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 78: rank 207. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 78: rank 208. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 78: rank 207. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 78: rank 206. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 78: rank 204. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 78: rank 203. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 78: rank 202. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 78: rank 201. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 78: rank 207. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 78: rank 203. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 78: rank 204. 18 Oct 2026 · 11:57 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 11:57 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 78: rank 203. 18 Oct 2026 · 11:57 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 78: rank 202. 18 Oct 2026 · 11:57 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 78: rank 201. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 78: rank 200. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 78: rank 199. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 78: rank 198. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 78: rank 197. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 78: rank 196. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 78: rank 195. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 78: rank 194. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 78: rank 193. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 78: rank 192. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 78: rank 191. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 78: rank 190. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 78: rank 189. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 78: rank 188. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 78: rank 187. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 78: rank 186. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 78: rank 185. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 78: rank 184. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 78: rank 183. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 78: rank 182. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 45 of 78: rank 181. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 46 of 78: rank 180. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 47 of 78: rank 179. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 48 of 78: rank 178. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 49 of 78: rank 177. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 50 of 78: rank 176. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 51 of 78: rank 175. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 52 of 78: rank 174. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 53 of 78: rank 173. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 54 of 78: rank 172. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 55 of 78: rank 171. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 56 of 78: rank 170. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 57 of 78: rank 169. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 58 of 78: rank 168. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 59 of 78: rank 167. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 60 of 78: rank 166. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 61 of 78: rank 165. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 62 of 78: rank 164. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 63 of 78: rank 163. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 64 of 78: rank 162. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 65 of 78: rank 161. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 66 of 78: rank 160. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 67 of 78: rank 159. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 68 of 78: rank 158. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 69 of 78: rank 157. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 70 of 78: rank 155. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 71 of 78: rank 154. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 72 of 78: rank 152. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 73 of 78: rank 150. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 74 of 78: rank 172. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 75 of 78: rank 189. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 76 of 78: rank 192. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 77 of 78: rank 201. 21 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500Recorded period 78 of 78: rank 202. 21 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500NOW #202Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

100%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% = 100.00% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#116

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

0.5 / 4

Food

Why 0.5 / 4?

School meals and relief support children and displaced people, but conflict disrupts supply and universal household food access.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-14
0.0 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 0.0 / 4?

Mass displacement and housing destruction mean no dependable universal free family housing baseline.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-14
1.5 / 4

Healthcare

Why 1.5 / 4?

Free care for pregnant women and children under five is established in law and reviewed by parliament in 2025, but not universal to all people.

Point calculation

1.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 37.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-14
0.0 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.0 / 4?

Conflict and fares block consistent nationwide no-payment mobility.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-14
0.0 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 0.0 / 4?

Conflict and water/energy access gaps remain; national household no-payment service not shown.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-14
Money Gate score
  • Food0.5 / 4
  • Housing / Land0.0 / 4
  • Healthcare1.5 / 4
  • Transportation0.0 / 4
  • Water / Energy0.0 / 4
  • Money still needed18.0 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 2.0 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 0.50 + Housing / Land 0.00 + Healthcare 1.50 + Transportation 0.00 + Water / Energy 0.00 = 2.00 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
91.4 / 100
Why 91.4 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -82.84) ÷ 2 = 91.42 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-45.0
Why -45.0?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 2.00 = -45.0

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-75.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -10.5

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-75.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-65.6× 25%= -16.4 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -65.6 × 25% = -16.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The live review treats labour-market access as only one part of time abundance: paid employment and income remain the main route to essentials, so employment is not counted as returned family time by itself. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The live review treats labour-market access as only one part of time abundance: paid employment and income remain the main route to essentials, so employment is not counted as returned family time by itself.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-69.8× 35%= -24.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

10.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 3.50 weighted points

Original evidence +10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +10.0; Money-gated reading -69.8 × 35% = -24.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The live review treats labour-market access as only one part of time abundance: paid employment and income remain the main route to essentials, so employment is not counted as returned family time by itself. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-97.3× 25%= -24.3 points
Exact point calculation

-90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -22.50 weighted points

Original evidence -90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -90.0; Money-gated reading -97.3 × 25% = -24.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Burkina Faso, employment-to-population ratio is a labour-market indicator. It does not reveal domestic care work, multiple-job overlap, commuting or daily disposable time for a family of five. Retain the earlier authored Human Time judgment until a specific time-use series is verified.

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The live review treats labour-market access as only one part of time abundance: paid employment and income remain the main route to essentials, so employment is not counted as returned family time by itself. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-68.4× 15%= -10.3 points
Exact point calculation

15.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.25 weighted points

Original evidence +15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +15.0; Money-gated reading -68.4 × 15% = -10.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The live review treats labour-market access as only one part of time abundance: paid employment and income remain the main route to essentials, so employment is not counted as returned family time by itself. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.41 + -24.41 + -24.31 + -10.26 = -75.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -10.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -10.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -75.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-10.5 Original evidence category score-10.5 Contribution to national evidence score-0.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 6.25 + 3.50 + -22.50 + 2.25 = -10.50

Base: -10.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -10.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -10.50 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.95 points

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: employment ratio is context, not family time

For Burkina Faso, employment-to-population ratio is a labour-market indicator. It does not reveal domestic care work, multiple-job overlap, commuting or daily disposable time for a family of five. Retain the earlier authored Human Time judgment until a specific time-use series is verified.

2026-10-14 World Bank WDI — employment-to-population ratio
Burkina Faso: human time burden — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The live review treats labour-market access as only one part of time abundance: paid employment and income remain the main route to essentials, so employment is not counted as returned family time by itself. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: human time burden — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The live review treats labour-market access as only one part of time abundance: paid employment and income remain the main route to essentials, so employment is not counted as returned family time by itself. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: human time burden — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The live review treats labour-market access as only one part of time abundance: paid employment and income remain the main route to essentials, so employment is not counted as returned family time by itself. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: human time burden — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The live review treats labour-market access as only one part of time abundance: paid employment and income remain the main route to essentials, so employment is not counted as returned family time by itself. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: Human Time & Burden Return research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The live review treats labour-market access as only one part of time abundance: paid employment and income remain the main route to essentials, so employment is not counted as returned family time by itself.

World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-72.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +0.8

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-72.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-61.5× 25%= -15.4 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 10.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -61.5 × 25% = -15.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Housing capacity exists, but adequacy, affordability, resilience and geographic reach remain uneven; shelter remains substantially money- and location-gated. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Housing capacity exists, but adequacy, affordability, resilience and geographic reach remain uneven; shelter remains substantially money- and location-gated.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-67.0× 35%= -23.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

20.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 7.00 weighted points

Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -67.0 × 35% = -23.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Housing capacity exists, but adequacy, affordability, resilience and geographic reach remain uneven; shelter remains substantially money- and location-gated. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-94.5× 25%= -23.6 points
Exact point calculation

-80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -20.00 weighted points

Original evidence -80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -80.0; Money-gated reading -94.5 × 25% = -23.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Housing capacity exists, but adequacy, affordability, resilience and geographic reach remain uneven; shelter remains substantially money- and location-gated. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-65.6× 15%= -9.8 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -65.6 × 15% = -9.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Housing capacity exists, but adequacy, affordability, resilience and geographic reach remain uneven; shelter remains substantially money- and location-gated. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -15.38 + -23.45 + -23.63 + -9.83 = -72.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +0.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +0.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -72.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+0.8 Original evidence category score+0.8 Contribution to national evidence score+0.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 10.00 + 7.00 + -20.00 + 3.75 = 0.75

Base: 0.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +0.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 0.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.06 points

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: housing shelter reach — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Housing capacity exists, but adequacy, affordability, resilience and geographic reach remain uneven; shelter remains substantially money- and location-gated. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: housing shelter reach — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Housing capacity exists, but adequacy, affordability, resilience and geographic reach remain uneven; shelter remains substantially money- and location-gated. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: housing shelter reach — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Housing capacity exists, but adequacy, affordability, resilience and geographic reach remain uneven; shelter remains substantially money- and location-gated. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: housing shelter reach — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Housing capacity exists, but adequacy, affordability, resilience and geographic reach remain uneven; shelter remains substantially money- and location-gated. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Housing capacity exists, but adequacy, affordability, resilience and geographic reach remain uneven; shelter remains substantially money- and location-gated.

World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-75.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -10.5

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-75.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-65.6× 25%= -16.4 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -65.6 × 25% = -16.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The food audit distinguishes physical production from nourishment reach. The cited food-security source shows that market access, shocks, nutrition or import exposure still matter, so domestic capacity is not treated as universal food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The food audit distinguishes physical production from nourishment reach. The cited food-security source shows that market access, shocks, nutrition or import exposure still matter, so domestic capacity is not treated as universal food abundance.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-69.8× 35%= -24.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

10.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 3.50 weighted points

Original evidence +10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +10.0; Money-gated reading -69.8 × 35% = -24.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The food audit distinguishes physical production from nourishment reach. The cited food-security source shows that market access, shocks, nutrition or import exposure still matter, so domestic capacity is not treated as universal food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-97.3× 25%= -24.3 points
Exact point calculation

-90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -22.50 weighted points

Original evidence -90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -90.0; Money-gated reading -97.3 × 25% = -24.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The food audit distinguishes physical production from nourishment reach. The cited food-security source shows that market access, shocks, nutrition or import exposure still matter, so domestic capacity is not treated as universal food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-68.4× 15%= -10.3 points
Exact point calculation

15.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.25 weighted points

Original evidence +15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +15.0; Money-gated reading -68.4 × 15% = -10.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The food audit distinguishes physical production from nourishment reach. The cited food-security source shows that market access, shocks, nutrition or import exposure still matter, so domestic capacity is not treated as universal food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.41 + -24.41 + -24.31 + -10.26 = -75.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -10.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -10.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -75.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-10.5 Original evidence category score-10.5 Contribution to national evidence score-0.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 6.25 + 3.50 + -22.50 + 2.25 = -10.50

Base: -10.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -10.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -10.50 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.95 points

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: food nourishment free food — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The food audit distinguishes physical production from nourishment reach. The cited food-security source shows that market access, shocks, nutrition or import exposure still matter, so domestic capacity is not treated as universal food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Burkina Faso country strategic plan
Burkina Faso: food nourishment free food — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The food audit distinguishes physical production from nourishment reach. The cited food-security source shows that market access, shocks, nutrition or import exposure still matter, so domestic capacity is not treated as universal food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Burkina Faso country strategic plan
Burkina Faso: food nourishment free food — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The food audit distinguishes physical production from nourishment reach. The cited food-security source shows that market access, shocks, nutrition or import exposure still matter, so domestic capacity is not treated as universal food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Burkina Faso country strategic plan
Burkina Faso: food nourishment free food — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The food audit distinguishes physical production from nourishment reach. The cited food-security source shows that market access, shocks, nutrition or import exposure still matter, so domestic capacity is not treated as universal food abundance. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Food Programme — Burkina Faso country strategic plan
Burkina Faso: Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The food audit distinguishes physical production from nourishment reach. The cited food-security source shows that market access, shocks, nutrition or import exposure still matter, so domestic capacity is not treated as universal food abundance.

World Food Programme — Burkina Faso country strategic plan
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-72.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +0.8

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-72.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-61.5× 25%= -15.4 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 10.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -61.5 × 25% = -15.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Water and sanitation systems are expanding, but the cited WASH evidence shows that safe, reliable service does not yet reach everyone equally; climate, distance or infrastructure gaps remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Water and sanitation systems are expanding, but the cited WASH evidence shows that safe, reliable service does not yet reach everyone equally; climate, distance or infrastructure gaps remain material.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-67.0× 35%= -23.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

20.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 7.00 weighted points

Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -67.0 × 35% = -23.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Water and sanitation systems are expanding, but the cited WASH evidence shows that safe, reliable service does not yet reach everyone equally; climate, distance or infrastructure gaps remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-94.5× 25%= -23.6 points
Exact point calculation

-80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -20.00 weighted points

Original evidence -80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -80.0; Money-gated reading -94.5 × 25% = -23.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Water and sanitation systems are expanding, but the cited WASH evidence shows that safe, reliable service does not yet reach everyone equally; climate, distance or infrastructure gaps remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-65.6× 15%= -9.8 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -65.6 × 15% = -9.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Water and sanitation systems are expanding, but the cited WASH evidence shows that safe, reliable service does not yet reach everyone equally; climate, distance or infrastructure gaps remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -15.38 + -23.45 + -23.63 + -9.83 = -72.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +0.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +0.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -72.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+0.8 Original evidence category score+0.8 Contribution to national evidence score0.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 10.00 + 7.00 + -20.00 + 3.75 = 0.75

Base: 0.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +0.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 0.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.05 points

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes 0.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: water sanitation — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Water and sanitation systems are expanding, but the cited WASH evidence shows that safe, reliable service does not yet reach everyone equally; climate, distance or infrastructure gaps remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF — Burkina Faso appeal
Burkina Faso: water sanitation — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Water and sanitation systems are expanding, but the cited WASH evidence shows that safe, reliable service does not yet reach everyone equally; climate, distance or infrastructure gaps remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF — Burkina Faso appeal
Burkina Faso: water sanitation — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Water and sanitation systems are expanding, but the cited WASH evidence shows that safe, reliable service does not yet reach everyone equally; climate, distance or infrastructure gaps remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF — Burkina Faso appeal
Burkina Faso: water sanitation — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Water and sanitation systems are expanding, but the cited WASH evidence shows that safe, reliable service does not yet reach everyone equally; climate, distance or infrastructure gaps remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF — Burkina Faso appeal
Burkina Faso: Water & Sanitation Abundance research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Water and sanitation systems are expanding, but the cited WASH evidence shows that safe, reliable service does not yet reach everyone equally; climate, distance or infrastructure gaps remain material.

UNICEF — Burkina Faso appeal
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-72.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +0.8

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-72.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-61.5× 25%= -15.4 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 10.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -61.5 × 25% = -15.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Energy capacity and access are real but reliability, affordability, import dependence, rural reach or climate exposure still limit household capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Energy capacity and access are real but reliability, affordability, import dependence, rural reach or climate exposure still limit household capability.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-67.0× 35%= -23.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

20.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 7.00 weighted points

Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -67.0 × 35% = -23.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Energy capacity and access are real but reliability, affordability, import dependence, rural reach or climate exposure still limit household capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-94.5× 25%= -23.6 points
Exact point calculation

-80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -20.00 weighted points

Original evidence -80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -80.0; Money-gated reading -94.5 × 25% = -23.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Energy capacity and access are real but reliability, affordability, import dependence, rural reach or climate exposure still limit household capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-65.6× 15%= -9.8 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -65.6 × 15% = -9.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Energy capacity and access are real but reliability, affordability, import dependence, rural reach or climate exposure still limit household capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -15.38 + -23.45 + -23.63 + -9.83 = -72.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +0.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +0.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -72.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+0.8 Original evidence category score+0.8 Contribution to national evidence score0.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 10.00 + 7.00 + -20.00 + 3.75 = 0.75

Base: 0.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +0.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 0.75 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.04 points

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes 0.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: energy household capability — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Energy capacity and access are real but reliability, affordability, import dependence, rural reach or climate exposure still limit household capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: energy household capability — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Energy capacity and access are real but reliability, affordability, import dependence, rural reach or climate exposure still limit household capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: energy household capability — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Energy capacity and access are real but reliability, affordability, import dependence, rural reach or climate exposure still limit household capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: energy household capability — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Energy capacity and access are real but reliability, affordability, import dependence, rural reach or climate exposure still limit household capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: Energy & Household Capability research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Energy capacity and access are real but reliability, affordability, import dependence, rural reach or climate exposure still limit household capability.

World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-72.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +0.8

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-72.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-61.5× 25%= -15.4 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 10.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -61.5 × 25% = -15.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The health system has functioning public capability, but WHO evidence supports a conservative reach score because service quality, distance, workforce, disease burden or financial/logistical barriers remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The health system has functioning public capability, but WHO evidence supports a conservative reach score because service quality, distance, workforce, disease burden or financial/logistical barriers remain material.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-67.0× 35%= -23.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 1.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

20.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 7.00 weighted points

Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -67.0 × 35% = -23.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The health system has functioning public capability, but WHO evidence supports a conservative reach score because service quality, distance, workforce, disease burden or financial/logistical barriers remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-94.5× 25%= -23.6 points
Exact point calculation

-80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -20.00 weighted points

Original evidence -80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -80.0; Money-gated reading -94.5 × 25% = -23.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The health system has functioning public capability, but WHO evidence supports a conservative reach score because service quality, distance, workforce, disease burden or financial/logistical barriers remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-65.6× 15%= -9.8 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -65.6 × 15% = -9.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The health system has functioning public capability, but WHO evidence supports a conservative reach score because service quality, distance, workforce, disease burden or financial/logistical barriers remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -15.38 + -23.45 + -23.63 + -9.83 = -72.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +0.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +0.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -72.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+0.8 Original evidence category score+0.8 Contribution to national evidence score+0.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 10.00 + 7.00 + -20.00 + 3.75 = 0.75

Base: 0.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +0.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 0.75 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.05 points

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: health care reach — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The health system has functioning public capability, but WHO evidence supports a conservative reach score because service quality, distance, workforce, disease burden or financial/logistical barriers remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 WHO — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: health care reach — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The health system has functioning public capability, but WHO evidence supports a conservative reach score because service quality, distance, workforce, disease burden or financial/logistical barriers remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 WHO — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: health care reach — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The health system has functioning public capability, but WHO evidence supports a conservative reach score because service quality, distance, workforce, disease burden or financial/logistical barriers remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 WHO — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: health care reach — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The health system has functioning public capability, but WHO evidence supports a conservative reach score because service quality, distance, workforce, disease burden or financial/logistical barriers remain material. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 WHO — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: Health & Care Reach research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The health system has functioning public capability, but WHO evidence supports a conservative reach score because service quality, distance, workforce, disease burden or financial/logistical barriers remain material.

WHO — Burkina Faso
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-75.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -10.5

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-75.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-65.6× 25%= -16.4 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -65.6 × 25% = -16.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Education institutions reach large parts of the population, but access, learning quality, retention and remote/disadvantaged-child gaps prevent school presence from being treated as full human capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Education institutions reach large parts of the population, but access, learning quality, retention and remote/disadvantaged-child gaps prevent school presence from being treated as full human capability.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-69.8× 35%= -24.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

10.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 3.50 weighted points

Original evidence +10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +10.0; Money-gated reading -69.8 × 35% = -24.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Education institutions reach large parts of the population, but access, learning quality, retention and remote/disadvantaged-child gaps prevent school presence from being treated as full human capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-97.3× 25%= -24.3 points
Exact point calculation

-90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -22.50 weighted points

Original evidence -90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -90.0; Money-gated reading -97.3 × 25% = -24.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Education institutions reach large parts of the population, but access, learning quality, retention and remote/disadvantaged-child gaps prevent school presence from being treated as full human capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-68.4× 15%= -10.3 points
Exact point calculation

15.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.25 weighted points

Original evidence +15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +15.0; Money-gated reading -68.4 × 15% = -10.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Education institutions reach large parts of the population, but access, learning quality, retention and remote/disadvantaged-child gaps prevent school presence from being treated as full human capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.41 + -24.41 + -24.31 + -10.26 = -75.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -10.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -10.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -75.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-10.5 Original evidence category score-10.5 Contribution to national evidence score-0.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 6.25 + 3.50 + -22.50 + 2.25 = -10.50

Base: -10.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -10.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -10.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.63 points

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: education human capability — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Education institutions reach large parts of the population, but access, learning quality, retention and remote/disadvantaged-child gaps prevent school presence from being treated as full human capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF — Burkina Faso appeal
Burkina Faso: education human capability — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Education institutions reach large parts of the population, but access, learning quality, retention and remote/disadvantaged-child gaps prevent school presence from being treated as full human capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF — Burkina Faso appeal
Burkina Faso: education human capability — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Education institutions reach large parts of the population, but access, learning quality, retention and remote/disadvantaged-child gaps prevent school presence from being treated as full human capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF — Burkina Faso appeal
Burkina Faso: education human capability — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Education institutions reach large parts of the population, but access, learning quality, retention and remote/disadvantaged-child gaps prevent school presence from being treated as full human capability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF — Burkina Faso appeal
Burkina Faso: Education & Human Capability research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Education institutions reach large parts of the population, but access, learning quality, retention and remote/disadvantaged-child gaps prevent school presence from being treated as full human capability.

UNICEF — Burkina Faso appeal
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-75.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -10.5

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-75.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-65.6× 25%= -16.4 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -65.6 × 25% = -16.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Transport infrastructure creates national and regional movement capacity, but distance, road quality, cost, reliability and last-mile access still consume household time and money. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Transport infrastructure creates national and regional movement capacity, but distance, road quality, cost, reliability and last-mile access still consume household time and money.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-69.8× 35%= -24.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

10.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 3.50 weighted points

Original evidence +10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +10.0; Money-gated reading -69.8 × 35% = -24.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Transport infrastructure creates national and regional movement capacity, but distance, road quality, cost, reliability and last-mile access still consume household time and money. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-97.3× 25%= -24.3 points
Exact point calculation

-90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -22.50 weighted points

Original evidence -90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -90.0; Money-gated reading -97.3 × 25% = -24.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Transport infrastructure creates national and regional movement capacity, but distance, road quality, cost, reliability and last-mile access still consume household time and money. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-68.4× 15%= -10.3 points
Exact point calculation

15.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.25 weighted points

Original evidence +15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +15.0; Money-gated reading -68.4 × 15% = -10.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Transport infrastructure creates national and regional movement capacity, but distance, road quality, cost, reliability and last-mile access still consume household time and money. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.41 + -24.41 + -24.31 + -10.26 = -75.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -10.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -10.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -75.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-10.5 Original evidence category score-10.5 Contribution to national evidence score-0.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 6.25 + 3.50 + -22.50 + 2.25 = -10.50

Base: -10.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -10.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -10.50 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.42 points

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: mobility reachability — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Transport infrastructure creates national and regional movement capacity, but distance, road quality, cost, reliability and last-mile access still consume household time and money. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: mobility reachability — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Transport infrastructure creates national and regional movement capacity, but distance, road quality, cost, reliability and last-mile access still consume household time and money. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: mobility reachability — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Transport infrastructure creates national and regional movement capacity, but distance, road quality, cost, reliability and last-mile access still consume household time and money. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: mobility reachability — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Transport infrastructure creates national and regional movement capacity, but distance, road quality, cost, reliability and last-mile access still consume household time and money. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: Mobility & Reachability research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Transport infrastructure creates national and regional movement capacity, but distance, road quality, cost, reliability and last-mile access still consume household time and money.

World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-75.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -10.5

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-75.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-65.6× 25%= -16.4 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -65.6 × 25% = -16.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Family stability is constrained where poverty, food, housing, employment, care and public-service gaps fall directly on children and caregivers; the score therefore reflects continuity of family life, not income alone. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Family stability is constrained where poverty, food, housing, employment, care and public-service gaps fall directly on children and caregivers; the score therefore reflects continuity of family life, not income alone.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-69.8× 35%= -24.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

10.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 3.50 weighted points

Original evidence +10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +10.0; Money-gated reading -69.8 × 35% = -24.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Family stability is constrained where poverty, food, housing, employment, care and public-service gaps fall directly on children and caregivers; the score therefore reflects continuity of family life, not income alone. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-97.3× 25%= -24.3 points
Exact point calculation

-90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -22.50 weighted points

Original evidence -90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -90.0; Money-gated reading -97.3 × 25% = -24.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Family stability is constrained where poverty, food, housing, employment, care and public-service gaps fall directly on children and caregivers; the score therefore reflects continuity of family life, not income alone. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-68.4× 15%= -10.3 points
Exact point calculation

15.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.25 weighted points

Original evidence +15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +15.0; Money-gated reading -68.4 × 15% = -10.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Family stability is constrained where poverty, food, housing, employment, care and public-service gaps fall directly on children and caregivers; the score therefore reflects continuity of family life, not income alone. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.41 + -24.41 + -24.31 + -10.26 = -75.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -10.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -10.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -75.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-10.5 Original evidence category score-10.5 Contribution to national evidence score-0.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 6.25 + 3.50 + -22.50 + 2.25 = -10.50

Base: -10.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -10.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -10.50 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.84 points

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: -10.5

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: -10.5 − 0 = -10.5 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Burkina Faso: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded by the 2026-10-10 legal-status review. Country is included in the 2026 legal-status survey under a status other than generally available domestic civil marriage. This describes legal status, not a demonstrated effect on birth rates.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2026-10-10 (access date; verify publication date in linked source) · Reviewed: 2026-10-10

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: family formation stability — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Family stability is constrained where poverty, food, housing, employment, care and public-service gaps fall directly on children and caregivers; the score therefore reflects continuity of family life, not income alone. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF — Burkina Faso appeal
Burkina Faso: family formation stability — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Family stability is constrained where poverty, food, housing, employment, care and public-service gaps fall directly on children and caregivers; the score therefore reflects continuity of family life, not income alone. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF — Burkina Faso appeal
Burkina Faso: family formation stability — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Family stability is constrained where poverty, food, housing, employment, care and public-service gaps fall directly on children and caregivers; the score therefore reflects continuity of family life, not income alone. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF — Burkina Faso appeal
Burkina Faso: family formation stability — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Family stability is constrained where poverty, food, housing, employment, care and public-service gaps fall directly on children and caregivers; the score therefore reflects continuity of family life, not income alone. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNICEF — Burkina Faso appeal
Burkina Faso: Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Family stability is constrained where poverty, food, housing, employment, care and public-service gaps fall directly on children and caregivers; the score therefore reflects continuity of family life, not income alone.

UNICEF — Burkina Faso appeal
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-64.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +27.5

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-64.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-53.3× 25%= -13.3 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.3 × 25% = -13.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Physical land and productive-ground capacity can be large even where ordinary families face tenure, purchase, lease, regulatory or location barriers. The score separates land existence from secure usable access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Physical land and productive-ground capacity can be large even where ordinary families face tenure, purchase, lease, regulatory or location barriers. The score separates land existence from secure usable access.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-58.8× 35%= -20.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -58.8 × 35% = -20.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Physical land and productive-ground capacity can be large even where ordinary families face tenure, purchase, lease, regulatory or location barriers. The score separates land existence from secure usable access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-89.0× 25%= -22.3 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -89.0 × 25% = -22.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Physical land and productive-ground capacity can be large even where ordinary families face tenure, purchase, lease, regulatory or location barriers. The score separates land existence from secure usable access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-58.8× 15%= -8.8 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -58.8 × 15% = -8.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Physical land and productive-ground capacity can be large even where ordinary families face tenure, purchase, lease, regulatory or location barriers. The score separates land existence from secure usable access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.31 + -20.56 + -22.25 + -8.82 = -64.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +27.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +27.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+27.5 Original evidence category score+27.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 7.50 = 27.50

Base: 27.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 27.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.38 points

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: land spatial freedom — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Physical land and productive-ground capacity can be large even where ordinary families face tenure, purchase, lease, regulatory or location barriers. The score separates land existence from secure usable access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: land spatial freedom — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Physical land and productive-ground capacity can be large even where ordinary families face tenure, purchase, lease, regulatory or location barriers. The score separates land existence from secure usable access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: land spatial freedom — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Physical land and productive-ground capacity can be large even where ordinary families face tenure, purchase, lease, regulatory or location barriers. The score separates land existence from secure usable access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: land spatial freedom — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Physical land and productive-ground capacity can be large even where ordinary families face tenure, purchase, lease, regulatory or location barriers. The score separates land existence from secure usable access. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: Land Access & Spatial Freedom research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Physical land and productive-ground capacity can be large even where ordinary families face tenure, purchase, lease, regulatory or location barriers. The score separates land existence from secure usable access.

World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-75.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -10.5

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-75.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-65.6× 25%= -16.4 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -65.6 × 25% = -16.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Nature, culture and public life create real potential for delight, but safety, poverty, climate stress, service burden or unequal access keep everyday peace of mind from being assumed nationally. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Nature, culture and public life create real potential for delight, but safety, poverty, climate stress, service burden or unequal access keep everyday peace of mind from being assumed nationally.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-69.8× 35%= -24.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

10.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 3.50 weighted points

Original evidence +10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +10.0; Money-gated reading -69.8 × 35% = -24.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Nature, culture and public life create real potential for delight, but safety, poverty, climate stress, service burden or unequal access keep everyday peace of mind from being assumed nationally. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-97.3× 25%= -24.3 points
Exact point calculation

-90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -22.50 weighted points

Original evidence -90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -90.0; Money-gated reading -97.3 × 25% = -24.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Nature, culture and public life create real potential for delight, but safety, poverty, climate stress, service burden or unequal access keep everyday peace of mind from being assumed nationally. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-68.4× 15%= -10.3 points
Exact point calculation

15.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.25 weighted points

Original evidence +15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +15.0; Money-gated reading -68.4 × 15% = -10.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Nature, culture and public life create real potential for delight, but safety, poverty, climate stress, service burden or unequal access keep everyday peace of mind from being assumed nationally. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.41 + -24.41 + -24.31 + -10.26 = -75.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -10.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -10.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -75.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-10.5 Original evidence category score-10.5 Contribution to national evidence score-0.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 6.25 + 3.50 + -22.50 + 2.25 = -10.50

Base: -10.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -10.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -10.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.63 points

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: peace beauty delight — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Nature, culture and public life create real potential for delight, but safety, poverty, climate stress, service burden or unequal access keep everyday peace of mind from being assumed nationally. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: peace beauty delight — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Nature, culture and public life create real potential for delight, but safety, poverty, climate stress, service burden or unequal access keep everyday peace of mind from being assumed nationally. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: peace beauty delight — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Nature, culture and public life create real potential for delight, but safety, poverty, climate stress, service burden or unequal access keep everyday peace of mind from being assumed nationally. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: peace beauty delight — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Nature, culture and public life create real potential for delight, but safety, poverty, climate stress, service burden or unequal access keep everyday peace of mind from being assumed nationally. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Nature, culture and public life create real potential for delight, but safety, poverty, climate stress, service burden or unequal access keep everyday peace of mind from being assumed nationally.

World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-64.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +27.5

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-64.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-53.3× 25%= -13.3 points
Exact point calculation

70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -53.3 × 25% = -13.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The country has important living-ground assets, but resilience is reduced where climate shocks, habitat loss, land degradation, pollution or infrastructure pressure weaken ecological function. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The country has important living-ground assets, but resilience is reduced where climate shocks, habitat loss, land degradation, pollution or infrastructure pressure weaken ecological function.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-58.8× 35%= -20.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -58.8 × 35% = -20.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The country has important living-ground assets, but resilience is reduced where climate shocks, habitat loss, land degradation, pollution or infrastructure pressure weaken ecological function. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-89.0× 25%= -22.3 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -89.0 × 25% = -22.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The country has important living-ground assets, but resilience is reduced where climate shocks, habitat loss, land degradation, pollution or infrastructure pressure weaken ecological function. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-58.8× 15%= -8.8 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -58.8 × 15% = -8.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The country has important living-ground assets, but resilience is reduced where climate shocks, habitat loss, land degradation, pollution or infrastructure pressure weaken ecological function. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -13.31 + -20.56 + -22.25 + -8.82 = -64.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +27.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +27.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+27.5 Original evidence category score+27.5 Contribution to national evidence score+1.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + -15.00 + 7.50 = 27.50

Base: 27.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +27.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 27.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.65 points

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: living ground resilience — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The country has important living-ground assets, but resilience is reduced where climate shocks, habitat loss, land degradation, pollution or infrastructure pressure weaken ecological function. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: living ground resilience — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The country has important living-ground assets, but resilience is reduced where climate shocks, habitat loss, land degradation, pollution or infrastructure pressure weaken ecological function. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: living ground resilience — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The country has important living-ground assets, but resilience is reduced where climate shocks, habitat loss, land degradation, pollution or infrastructure pressure weaken ecological function. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: living ground resilience — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The country has important living-ground assets, but resilience is reduced where climate shocks, habitat loss, land degradation, pollution or infrastructure pressure weaken ecological function. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. The country has important living-ground assets, but resilience is reduced where climate shocks, habitat loss, land degradation, pollution or infrastructure pressure weaken ecological function.

World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-75.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -10.5

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-75.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-65.6× 25%= -16.4 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -65.6 × 25% = -16.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Public institutions and legal systems provide real capacity, but access friction, security conditions, administrative burden and unequal ability to navigate institutions justify a conservative justice/safety score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Public institutions and legal systems provide real capacity, but access friction, security conditions, administrative burden and unequal ability to navigate institutions justify a conservative justice/safety score.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-69.8× 35%= -24.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

10.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 3.50 weighted points

Original evidence +10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +10.0; Money-gated reading -69.8 × 35% = -24.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Public institutions and legal systems provide real capacity, but access friction, security conditions, administrative burden and unequal ability to navigate institutions justify a conservative justice/safety score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-97.3× 25%= -24.3 points
Exact point calculation

-90.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -22.50 weighted points

Original evidence -90.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -90.0; Money-gated reading -97.3 × 25% = -24.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Public institutions and legal systems provide real capacity, but access friction, security conditions, administrative burden and unequal ability to navigate institutions justify a conservative justice/safety score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-68.4× 15%= -10.3 points
Exact point calculation

15.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.25 weighted points

Original evidence +15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +15.0; Money-gated reading -68.4 × 15% = -10.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Public institutions and legal systems provide real capacity, but access friction, security conditions, administrative burden and unequal ability to navigate institutions justify a conservative justice/safety score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.41 + -24.41 + -24.31 + -10.26 = -75.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -10.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -10.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -75.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-10.5 Original evidence category score-10.5 Contribution to national evidence score-0.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 6.25 + 3.50 + -22.50 + 2.25 = -10.50

Base: -10.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -10.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -10.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.53 points

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +15.0

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: justice safety friction — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Public institutions and legal systems provide real capacity, but access friction, security conditions, administrative burden and unequal ability to navigate institutions justify a conservative justice/safety score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: justice safety friction — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Public institutions and legal systems provide real capacity, but access friction, security conditions, administrative burden and unequal ability to navigate institutions justify a conservative justice/safety score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: justice safety friction — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Public institutions and legal systems provide real capacity, but access friction, security conditions, administrative burden and unequal ability to navigate institutions justify a conservative justice/safety score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: justice safety friction — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Public institutions and legal systems provide real capacity, but access friction, security conditions, administrative burden and unequal ability to navigate institutions justify a conservative justice/safety score. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Public institutions and legal systems provide real capacity, but access friction, security conditions, administrative burden and unequal ability to navigate institutions justify a conservative justice/safety score.

World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-72.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +0.8

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-72.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-61.5× 25%= -15.4 points
Exact point calculation

40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 10.00 weighted points

Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -61.5 × 25% = -15.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Infrastructure can be repaired and maintained, but the recovered automation package did not establish universal circular-material return. The production score therefore remains conservative rather than treating waste projects or maintenance plans as completed circularity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Infrastructure can be repaired and maintained, but the recovered automation package did not establish universal circular-material return. The production score therefore remains conservative rather than treating waste projects or maintenance plans as completed circularity.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-67.0× 35%= -23.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

20.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 7.00 weighted points

Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -67.0 × 35% = -23.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Infrastructure can be repaired and maintained, but the recovered automation package did not establish universal circular-material return. The production score therefore remains conservative rather than treating waste projects or maintenance plans as completed circularity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-94.5× 25%= -23.6 points
Exact point calculation

-80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -20.00 weighted points

Original evidence -80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -80.0; Money-gated reading -94.5 × 25% = -23.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Infrastructure can be repaired and maintained, but the recovered automation package did not establish universal circular-material return. The production score therefore remains conservative rather than treating waste projects or maintenance plans as completed circularity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-65.6× 15%= -9.8 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -65.6 × 15% = -9.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Infrastructure can be repaired and maintained, but the recovered automation package did not establish universal circular-material return. The production score therefore remains conservative rather than treating waste projects or maintenance plans as completed circularity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -15.38 + -23.45 + -23.63 + -9.83 = -72.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +0.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +0.8. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -72.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+0.8 Original evidence category score+0.8 Contribution to national evidence score0.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 10.00 + 7.00 + -20.00 + 3.75 = 0.75

Base: 0.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +0.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 0.75 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.03 points

Material transfers: scored in International Footprint

Exporter responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint); importer responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint). Material movement is a real workload; these are TBF authored judgments, not certified illegal dumping estimates. Each role is included ONCE in the Footprint 3.1 published score.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

The material-transfer burden already affects the published score. Facility-specific downstream harm remains a separate research claim. No second penalty is added for the same trade.

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes 0.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +20.0

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: durability material return — rail 4 review

Time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Infrastructure can be repaired and maintained, but the recovered automation package did not establish universal circular-material return. The production score therefore remains conservative rather than treating waste projects or maintenance plans as completed circularity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: durability material return — rail 3 review

Costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Infrastructure can be repaired and maintained, but the recovered automation package did not establish universal circular-material return. The production score therefore remains conservative rather than treating waste projects or maintenance plans as completed circularity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: durability material return — rail 2 review

Reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Infrastructure can be repaired and maintained, but the recovered automation package did not establish universal circular-material return. The production score therefore remains conservative rather than treating waste projects or maintenance plans as completed circularity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: durability material return — rail 1 review

Available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Infrastructure can be repaired and maintained, but the recovered automation package did not establish universal circular-material return. The production score therefore remains conservative rather than treating waste projects or maintenance plans as completed circularity. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: Durability, Repair & Material Return research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. Infrastructure can be repaired and maintained, but the recovered automation package did not establish universal circular-material return. The production score therefore remains conservative rather than treating waste projects or maintenance plans as completed circularity.

World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
6% weight International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
-74.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence -6.0

International score breakdown

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

-74.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Entry Accessibility 25%
See all nine International Welcome Entry Accessibility scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-72.5× 25%= -18.1 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -72.5 × 25% = -18.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Lawful entry and practical travel options, visa rules and reachable borders. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. International movement remains governed by passports, visas, residence rules, documentation and financial conditions. This is recorded factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. International movement remains governed by passports, visas, residence rules, documentation and financial conditions. This is recorded factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology.

🤔
Migrant Practical Life 30%
See all nine International Welcome Migrant Practical Life scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-76.6× 30%= -23.0 points
Exact point calculation

-15.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = -4.50 weighted points

Original evidence -15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -15.0; Money-gated reading -76.6 × 30% = -23.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Migration, residency and actual ability to live safely with services. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. International movement remains governed by passports, visas, residence rules, documentation and financial conditions. This is recorded factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome 25%
See all nine International Welcome Refugee / Neighbour Welcome scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-69.8× 25%= -17.4 points
Exact point calculation

10.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 2.50 weighted points

Original evidence +10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +10.0; Money-gated reading -69.8 × 25% = -17.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Refugee reception, host communities and international protection. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. International movement remains governed by passports, visas, residence rules, documentation and financial conditions. This is recorded factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Flexibility / Continuity 20%
See all nine International Welcome Flexibility / Continuity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-78.0× 20%= -15.6 points
Exact point calculation

-20.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = -4.00 weighted points

Original evidence -20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -20.0; Money-gated reading -78.0 × 20% = -15.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Family unity, citizenship continuity and predictable renewal of stay. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. International movement remains governed by passports, visas, residence rules, documentation and financial conditions. This is recorded factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -18.13 + -22.99 + -17.44 + -15.59 = -74.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -6.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -6.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -74.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-6.0 Original evidence category score-6.0 Contribution to national evidence score-0.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 0.00 + -4.50 + 2.50 + -4.00 = -6.00

Base: -6.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -6.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -6.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.36 points

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: international access human welcome — rail 4 review

Family unity, citizenship continuity and predictable renewal of stay. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. International movement remains governed by passports, visas, residence rules, documentation and financial conditions. This is recorded factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: international access human welcome — rail 3 review

Refugee reception, host communities and international protection. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. International movement remains governed by passports, visas, residence rules, documentation and financial conditions. This is recorded factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: international access human welcome — rail 2 review

Migration, residency and actual ability to live safely with services. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. International movement remains governed by passports, visas, residence rules, documentation and financial conditions. This is recorded factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: international access human welcome — rail 1 review

Lawful entry and practical travel options, visa rules and reachable borders. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. International movement remains governed by passports, visas, residence rules, documentation and financial conditions. This is recorded factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. International movement remains governed by passports, visas, residence rules, documentation and financial conditions. This is recorded factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology.

World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-72.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence -0.5

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-72.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Positive Contribution 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-70.5× 25%= -17.6 points
Exact point calculation

5.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 1.25 weighted points

Original evidence +5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +7.3; Money-gated reading -70.5 × 25% = -17.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Helpful international contributions and transferable capacity. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. External trade, resource flows, aid, emissions and cross-border effects cannot be reduced to territorial conditions alone. This category records the external ledger factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. External trade, resource flows, aid, emissions and cross-border effects cannot be reduced to territorial conditions alone. This category records the external ledger factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology.

🤔
Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-70.5× 25%= -17.6 points
Exact point calculation

5.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 1.25 weighted points

Original evidence +5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +7.3; Money-gated reading -70.5 × 25% = -17.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Mutuality, dignity and shared benefit to residents and partner communities. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. External trade, resource flows, aid, emissions and cross-border effects cannot be reduced to territorial conditions alone. This category records the external ledger factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-76.0× 35%= -26.6 points
Exact point calculation

-15.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -5.25 weighted points

Original evidence -15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -12.8; Money-gated reading -76.0 × 35% = -26.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

External social/ecological harm and attempted repair. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. External trade, resource flows, aid, emissions and cross-border effects cannot be reduced to territorial conditions alone. This category records the external ledger factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Accountability / Repair 15%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-71.9× 15%= -10.8 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +2.3; Money-gated reading -71.9 × 15% = -10.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Trade-flow scrutiny: volume/handling unknown unless a dated customs record is present. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. External trade, resource flows, aid, emissions and cross-border effects cannot be reduced to territorial conditions alone. This category records the external ledger factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. HS3915 export/import weights and destination-processing pathways were not independently confirmed in this pass; no illegal dumping or zero trade is asserted. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -17.63 + -17.63 + -26.60 + -10.78 = -72.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -2.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): +2.3. Effective evidence: -0.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -72.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-2.8 Published research adjustment+2.3 Original evidence category score-0.5 Contribution to national evidence score0.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 1.25 + 1.25 + -5.25 + 0.00 = -2.75

Base: -0.50 · reviewed adjustment: 2.25 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -0.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -0.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.03 points

Material transfers: scored in International Footprint

Exporter responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint); importer responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint). Material movement is a real workload; these are TBF authored judgments, not certified illegal dumping estimates. Each role is included ONCE in the Footprint 3.1 published score.

Exported waste / garbageRole: 0.00/100 · scored
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingRole: 0.00/100 · scored

The material-transfer burden already affects the published score. Facility-specific downstream harm remains a separate research claim. No second penalty is added for the same trade.

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

TBF provisional footprint ordinal judgment: 25% useful contribution + 25% mutual benefit + 20% non-trade harm/repair + 15% exporter + 15% importer. HS3915 exporter/importer role unverified; two trade inputs remain unassessed (0 neutral placeholder, NOT proof zero waste or no harm). Trade inputs may change the category when substantiated. No second waste deduction.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Burkina Faso, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Burkina Faso’s researched categories, this category contributes 0.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

Burkina Faso: external footprint non extractive — rail 4 review

Trade-flow scrutiny: volume/handling unknown unless a dated customs record is present. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. External trade, resource flows, aid, emissions and cross-border effects cannot be reduced to territorial conditions alone. This category records the external ledger factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. HS3915 export/import weights and destination-processing pathways were not independently confirmed in this pass; no illegal dumping or zero trade is asserted. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: external footprint non extractive — rail 3 review

External social/ecological harm and attempted repair. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. External trade, resource flows, aid, emissions and cross-border effects cannot be reduced to territorial conditions alone. This category records the external ledger factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: external footprint non extractive — rail 2 review

Mutuality, dignity and shared benefit to residents and partner communities. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. External trade, resource flows, aid, emissions and cross-border effects cannot be reduced to territorial conditions alone. This category records the external ledger factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: external footprint non extractive — rail 1 review

Helpful international contributions and transferable capacity. Prior researched country observation: Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. External trade, resource flows, aid, emissions and cross-border effects cannot be reduced to territorial conditions alone. This category records the external ledger factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank Data — Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct research finding

Burkina Faso faces severe conflict, displacement, food insecurity and interruptions to schooling, health, WASH and mobility. Agricultural and solar potential remain real, but safety and access constraints dominate current reach. External trade, resource flows, aid, emissions and cross-border effects cannot be reduced to territorial conditions alone. This category records the external ledger factually and remains unscored under the frozen methodology.

World Bank Data — Burkina Faso

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.