Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Gabon 🇬🇦

Gabon currently ranks #210 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -75.32. This country is money-gated (1.50/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Living Ground and weakest in Land across 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Tracking baselineEvidence through 4 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-75.3
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: -8.2 · Money Gate: 1.50/20 · Headline: -75.3.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#210of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

GabonLast recorded move: down from #209 to #210.Recent recorded movements
  1. #209 → #21021 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500
  2. #208 → #20921 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500
  3. #197 → #20820 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #197 → #20020 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 66: rank 205. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 66: rank 211. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 66: rank 211. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 9 Oct 2026 · 07:51 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 66: rank 210. 9 Oct 2026 · 12:04 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 66: rank 211. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 66: rank 210. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 66: rank 209. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 66: rank 210. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 66: rank 209. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 66: rank 208. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 66: rank 209. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 66: rank 210. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 66: rank 209. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 66: rank 208. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 66: rank 206. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 66: rank 205. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 66: rank 204. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 66: rank 203. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 66: rank 209. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 66: rank 208. 18 Oct 2026 · 11:57 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 11:57 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 66: rank 207. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 66: rank 206. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 66: rank 205. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 66: rank 204. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 66: rank 203. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 66: rank 202. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 66: rank 201. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 66: rank 200. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 66: rank 234. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 66: rank 233. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 66: rank 232. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 66: rank 231. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 66: rank 230. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 66: rank 229. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 66: rank 228. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 66: rank 227. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 66: rank 226. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 66: rank 225. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 66: rank 224. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 66: rank 223. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 66: rank 222. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 66: rank 221. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 66: rank 220. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 66: rank 219. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 45 of 66: rank 218. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 46 of 66: rank 217. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 47 of 66: rank 216. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 48 of 66: rank 215. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 49 of 66: rank 214. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 50 of 66: rank 213. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 51 of 66: rank 212. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 52 of 66: rank 211. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 53 of 66: rank 210. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 54 of 66: rank 209. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 55 of 66: rank 208. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 56 of 66: rank 207. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 57 of 66: rank 206. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 58 of 66: rank 205. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 59 of 66: rank 204. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 60 of 66: rank 202. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 61 of 66: rank 201. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 62 of 66: rank 199. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 16:49 GMT-0500Recorded period 63 of 66: rank 197. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 64 of 66: rank 200. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 65 of 66: rank 209. 21 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500Recorded period 66 of 66: rank 210. 21 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500NOW #210Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

100%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% = 100.00% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#127

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

0.0 / 4

Food

Why 0.0 / 4?

UNESCO reported no national school-meal programme in the reviewed baseline; a programme was still being prepared in 2025, so no direct food credit is assigned.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
0.0 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 0.0 / 4?

Large social-housing construction is underway, but no broad ordinary no-payment shelter or land route was verified.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
1.5 / 4

Healthcare

Why 1.5 / 4?

CNAMGS provides broad insurance and subsidized coverage including economically weak Gabonese, but contributions, reimbursements and copayments preserve material financial friction.

Point calculation

1.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 37.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
0.0 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.0 / 4?

The rebuilt public transport network is intended to be accessible but remains a paid service; no zero-fare baseline was verified.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
0.0 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 0.0 / 4?

Water and electricity are being expanded through major infrastructure projects but remain tariffed services rather than free household entitlements.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
Money Gate score
  • Food0.0 / 4
  • Housing / Land0.0 / 4
  • Healthcare1.5 / 4
  • Transportation0.0 / 4
  • Water / Energy0.0 / 4
  • Money still needed18.5 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 1.5 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 0.00 + Housing / Land 0.00 + Healthcare 1.50 + Transportation 0.00 + Water / Energy 0.00 = 1.50 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
60.1 / 100
Why 60.1 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -20.15) ÷ 2 = 60.08 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-46.3
Why -46.3?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 1.50 = -46.3

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-79.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence -22.0

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-79.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-77.1× 25%= -19.3 points
Exact point calculation

-14.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -3.50 weighted points

Original evidence -14.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -14.8; Money-gated reading -77.1 × 25% = -19.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Gabon, world Bank estimates show rising poverty despite national resource wealth, leaving many households dependent on cash without broad abundance reach.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-78.7× 35%= -27.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-20.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -7.00 weighted points

Original evidence -20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -20.8; Money-gated reading -78.7 × 35% = -27.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, world Bank estimates show rising poverty despite national resource wealth, leaving many households dependent on cash without broad abundance reach.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.9× 25%= -20.5 points
Exact point calculation

-32.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.00 weighted points

Original evidence -32.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -32.8; Money-gated reading -81.9 × 25% = -20.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, world Bank estimates show rising poverty despite national resource wealth, leaving many households dependent on cash without broad abundance reach.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-78.2× 15%= -11.7 points
Exact point calculation

-18.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -2.70 weighted points

Original evidence -18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -18.8; Money-gated reading -78.2 × 15% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, world Bank estimates show rising poverty despite national resource wealth, leaving many households dependent on cash without broad abundance reach.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.28 + -27.55 + -20.49 + -11.72 = -79.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -21.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -22.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -79.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-21.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-22.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -3.50 + -7.00 + -8.00 + -2.70 = -21.20

Base: -22.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -22.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -22.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.98 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Gabon, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Oil wealth coexists with high poverty and weak job creation

For Gabon, world Bank estimates show rising poverty despite national resource wealth, leaving many households dependent on cash without broad abundance reach.

2026-10-05 World Bank — Gabon overview
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-81.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence -30.0

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-81.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-79.3× 25%= -19.8 points
Exact point calculation

-22.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -5.50 weighted points

Original evidence -22.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -22.8; Money-gated reading -79.3 × 25% = -19.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, the Bikélé-Nzong programme plans thousands of social homes, yet it is not a universal no-payment housing route.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.9× 35%= -28.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-28.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -9.80 weighted points

Original evidence -28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -28.8; Money-gated reading -80.9 × 35% = -28.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Gabon, the Bikélé-Nzong programme plans thousands of social homes, yet it is not a universal no-payment housing route.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-84.1× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

-40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.00 weighted points

Original evidence -40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -40.8; Money-gated reading -84.1 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, the Bikélé-Nzong programme plans thousands of social homes, yet it is not a universal no-payment housing route.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.3× 15%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

-26.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.90 weighted points

Original evidence -26.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -26.8; Money-gated reading -80.3 × 15% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, the Bikélé-Nzong programme plans thousands of social homes, yet it is not a universal no-payment housing route.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.81 + -28.30 + -21.02 + -12.06 = -81.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -29.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -30.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -81.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-29.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-30.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -5.50 + -9.80 + -10.00 + -3.90 = -29.20

Base: -30.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -30.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -30.00 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -2.40 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

For Gabon, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

A large social-housing programme is beginning but shelter remains market-gated

For Gabon, the Bikélé-Nzong programme plans thousands of social homes, yet it is not a universal no-payment housing route.

2026-10-05 Presidency — Bikélé-Nzong social housing programme
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-78.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence -20.0

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-78.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-76.6× 25%= -19.1 points
Exact point calculation

-12.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -3.00 weighted points

Original evidence -12.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -12.8; Money-gated reading -76.6 × 25% = -19.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

UNESCO reported Gabon was preparing a national school-feeding programme in 2025, so planned food support is not counted as existing free food access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-78.2× 35%= -27.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-18.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -6.30 weighted points

Original evidence -18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -18.8; Money-gated reading -78.2 × 35% = -27.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

UNESCO reported Gabon was preparing a national school-feeding programme in 2025, so planned food support is not counted as existing free food access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.4× 25%= -20.4 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.8; Money-gated reading -81.4 × 25% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

UNESCO reported Gabon was preparing a national school-feeding programme in 2025, so planned food support is not counted as existing free food access.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-77.6× 15%= -11.7 points
Exact point calculation

-16.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -2.40 weighted points

Original evidence -16.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -16.8; Money-gated reading -77.6 × 15% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

UNESCO reported Gabon was preparing a national school-feeding programme in 2025, so planned food support is not counted as existing free food access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.14 + -27.36 + -20.35 + -11.65 = -78.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -19.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -20.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -78.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-19.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-20.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -3.00 + -6.30 + -7.50 + -2.40 = -19.20

Base: -20.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -20.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -20.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.80 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Gabon, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

No national school-meal programme was operating in the reviewed baseline

UNESCO reported Gabon was preparing a national school-feeding programme in 2025, so planned food support is not counted as existing free food access.

2026-10-05 UNESCO Education Profiles — Gabon school meals
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-78.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence -18.0

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-78.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-76.0× 25%= -19.0 points
Exact point calculation

-10.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -2.50 weighted points

Original evidence -10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -10.8; Money-gated reading -76.0 × 25% = -19.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, a new World Bank-backed programme targets water and sanitation gaps, showing current reach is incomplete.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-77.6× 35%= -27.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-16.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -5.60 weighted points

Original evidence -16.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -16.8; Money-gated reading -77.6 × 35% = -27.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, a new World Bank-backed programme targets water and sanitation gaps, showing current reach is incomplete.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.9× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-28.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.00 weighted points

Original evidence -28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -28.8; Money-gated reading -80.9 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, a new World Bank-backed programme targets water and sanitation gaps, showing current reach is incomplete.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-77.1× 15%= -11.6 points
Exact point calculation

-14.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -2.10 weighted points

Original evidence -14.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -14.8; Money-gated reading -77.1 × 15% = -11.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Gabon, a new World Bank-backed programme targets water and sanitation gaps, showing current reach is incomplete.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.01 + -27.17 + -20.22 + -11.56 = -78.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -17.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -18.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -78.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-17.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-18.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -2.50 + -5.60 + -7.00 + -2.10 = -17.20

Base: -18.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -18.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -18.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.08 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

For Gabon, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-75.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence -10.0

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-75.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-73.9× 25%= -18.5 points
Exact point calculation

-2.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -0.50 weighted points

Original evidence -2.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -2.8; Money-gated reading -73.9 × 25% = -18.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Gabon is investing in electricity services and grid reliability; household service remains tariffed.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-75.5× 35%= -26.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-8.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -2.80 weighted points

Original evidence -8.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -8.8; Money-gated reading -75.5 × 35% = -26.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Gabon is investing in electricity services and grid reliability; household service remains tariffed.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-78.7× 25%= -19.7 points
Exact point calculation

-20.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -5.00 weighted points

Original evidence -20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -20.8; Money-gated reading -78.7 × 25% = -19.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Gabon is investing in electricity services and grid reliability; household service remains tariffed.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-75.0× 15%= -11.2 points
Exact point calculation

-6.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -0.90 weighted points

Original evidence -6.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -6.8; Money-gated reading -75.0 × 15% = -11.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Gabon is investing in electricity services and grid reliability; household service remains tariffed.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -18.47 + -26.42 + -19.68 + -11.24 = -75.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -9.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -10.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -75.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-9.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-10.0 Contribution to national evidence score-0.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -0.50 + -2.80 + -5.00 + -0.90 = -9.20

Base: -10.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -10.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -10.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.50 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

For Gabon, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

7% weight Health & Care Reach
-71.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +5.0

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-71.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-69.8× 25%= -17.5 points
Exact point calculation

13.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 3.25 weighted points

Original evidence +13.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +12.2; Money-gated reading -69.8 × 25% = -17.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

National insurance covers broad groups including economically weak Gabonese, but reimbursement rules, contributions and copayments preserve financial friction.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-71.5× 35%= -25.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 1.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

7.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 2.45 weighted points

Original evidence +7.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +6.2; Money-gated reading -71.5 × 35% = -25.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

National insurance covers broad groups including economically weak Gabonese, but reimbursement rules, contributions and copayments preserve financial friction.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-74.7× 25%= -18.7 points
Exact point calculation

-5.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -1.25 weighted points

Original evidence -5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -5.8; Money-gated reading -74.7 × 25% = -18.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

National insurance covers broad groups including economically weak Gabonese, but reimbursement rules, contributions and copayments preserve financial friction.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-70.9× 15%= -10.6 points
Exact point calculation

9.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 1.35 weighted points

Original evidence +9.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +8.2; Money-gated reading -70.9 × 15% = -10.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

National insurance covers broad groups including economically weak Gabonese, but reimbursement rules, contributions and copayments preserve financial friction.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -17.46 + -25.01 + -18.67 + -10.64 = -71.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +5.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: +5.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -71.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+5.8 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score+5.0 Contribution to national evidence score+0.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 3.25 + 2.45 + -1.25 + 1.35 = 5.80

Base: 5.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +5.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 5.00 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.35 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Gabon, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

CNAMGS gives substantial health protection but care is not fully no-payment

National insurance covers broad groups including economically weak Gabonese, but reimbursement rules, contributions and copayments preserve financial friction.

2026-10-05 CNAMGS — health coverage
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-78.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence -20.0

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-78.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-76.6× 25%= -19.1 points
Exact point calculation

-12.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -3.00 weighted points

Original evidence -12.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -12.8; Money-gated reading -76.6 × 25% = -19.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, public education capacity is significant, yet poverty, infrastructure and learning-quality gaps constrain capability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-78.2× 35%= -27.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-18.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -6.30 weighted points

Original evidence -18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -18.8; Money-gated reading -78.2 × 35% = -27.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, public education capacity is significant, yet poverty, infrastructure and learning-quality gaps constrain capability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-81.4× 25%= -20.4 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.8; Money-gated reading -81.4 × 25% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, public education capacity is significant, yet poverty, infrastructure and learning-quality gaps constrain capability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-77.6× 15%= -11.7 points
Exact point calculation

-16.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -2.40 weighted points

Original evidence -16.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -16.8; Money-gated reading -77.6 × 15% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Gabon, public education capacity is significant, yet poverty, infrastructure and learning-quality gaps constrain capability.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.14 + -27.36 + -20.35 + -11.65 = -78.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -19.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -20.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -78.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-19.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-20.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -3.00 + -6.30 + -7.50 + -2.40 = -19.20

Base: -20.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -20.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -20.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.20 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Gabon, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Education access exists but outcomes and financing remain uneven

For Gabon, public education capacity is significant, yet poverty, infrastructure and learning-quality gaps constrain capability.

2026-10-05 World Bank — Gabon overview
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-78.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence -18.0

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-78.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-76.0× 25%= -19.0 points
Exact point calculation

-10.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -2.50 weighted points

Original evidence -10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -10.8; Money-gated reading -76.0 × 25% = -19.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, the new national transport company is expanding accessible mobility, but no universal zero-fare route was verified.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-77.6× 35%= -27.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

-16.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -5.60 weighted points

Original evidence -16.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -16.8; Money-gated reading -77.6 × 35% = -27.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, the new national transport company is expanding accessible mobility, but no universal zero-fare route was verified.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-80.9× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-28.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.00 weighted points

Original evidence -28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -28.8; Money-gated reading -80.9 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, the new national transport company is expanding accessible mobility, but no universal zero-fare route was verified.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-77.1× 15%= -11.6 points
Exact point calculation

-14.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -2.10 weighted points

Original evidence -14.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -14.8; Money-gated reading -77.1 × 15% = -11.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Gabon, the new national transport company is expanding accessible mobility, but no universal zero-fare route was verified.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.01 + -27.17 + -20.22 + -11.56 = -78.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -17.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -18.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -78.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-17.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-18.0 Contribution to national evidence score-0.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -2.50 + -5.60 + -7.00 + -2.10 = -17.20

Base: -18.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -18.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -18.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.72 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Gabon, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Public transport is being rebuilt but remains a paid service

For Gabon, the new national transport company is expanding accessible mobility, but no universal zero-fare route was verified.

2026-10-05 World Bank — Gabon overview
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-69.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +14.6

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-69.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-67.3× 25%= -16.8 points
Exact point calculation

22.64 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 5.66 weighted points

Original evidence +22.6; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +21.8; Money-gated reading -67.3 × 25% = -16.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, the 2024 TFR is 3.592, giving strong positive fertility performance, while poverty and housing/employment pressures still weigh on family stability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-68.9× 35%= -24.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

16.64 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 5.82 weighted points

Original evidence +16.6; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +15.8; Money-gated reading -68.9 × 35% = -24.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, the 2024 TFR is 3.592, giving strong positive fertility performance, while poverty and housing/employment pressures still weigh on family stability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-72.1× 25%= -18.0 points
Exact point calculation

4.64 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 1.16 weighted points

Original evidence +4.6; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +3.8; Money-gated reading -72.1 × 25% = -18.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, the 2024 TFR is 3.592, giving strong positive fertility performance, while poverty and housing/employment pressures still weigh on family stability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-68.3× 15%= -10.3 points
Exact point calculation

18.64 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.80 weighted points

Original evidence +18.6; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +17.8; Money-gated reading -68.3 × 15% = -10.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Gabon, the 2024 TFR is 3.592, giving strong positive fertility performance, while poverty and housing/employment pressures still weigh on family stability.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.81 + -24.10 + -18.02 + -10.26 = -69.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +15.4. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: +14.6. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -69.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+15.4 Published family-method adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score+14.6 Contribution to national evidence score+1.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 5.66 + 5.82 + 1.16 + 2.80 = 15.44

Base: 14.64 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +14.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 14.64 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.17 points

Why the family-method adjustment is applied

New and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Gabon, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +14.6

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: +14.6 − 0 = +14.6 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Gabon: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded by the 2026-10-10 legal-status review. Country is included in the 2026 legal-status survey under a status other than generally available domestic civil marriage. This describes legal status, not a demonstrated effect on birth rates.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2026-10-10 (access date; verify publication date in linked source) · Reviewed: 2026-10-10

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Fertility is comfortably above replacement and supports continuity

For Gabon, the 2024 TFR is 3.592, giving strong positive fertility performance, while poverty and housing/employment pressures still weigh on family stability.

2026-10-05 World Bank WDI via FRED

Published indicators

Total fertility rate3.59 births per woman

World Bank World Development Indicators via FRED · 2024

Source
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-81.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence -30.0

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-81.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-79.3× 25%= -19.8 points
Exact point calculation

-22.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -5.50 weighted points

Original evidence -22.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -22.8; Money-gated reading -79.3 × 25% = -19.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, extensive territory and forests coexist with urban informality, land administration and affordability barriers.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-80.9× 35%= -28.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-28.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -9.80 weighted points

Original evidence -28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -28.8; Money-gated reading -80.9 × 35% = -28.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, extensive territory and forests coexist with urban informality, land administration and affordability barriers.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-84.1× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

-40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.00 weighted points

Original evidence -40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -40.8; Money-gated reading -84.1 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, extensive territory and forests coexist with urban informality, land administration and affordability barriers.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-80.3× 15%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

-26.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.90 weighted points

Original evidence -26.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -26.8; Money-gated reading -80.3 × 15% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Gabon, extensive territory and forests coexist with urban informality, land administration and affordability barriers.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.81 + -28.30 + -21.02 + -12.06 = -81.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -29.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -30.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -81.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-29.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-30.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -5.50 + -9.80 + -10.00 + -3.90 = -29.20

Base: -30.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -30.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -30.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.50 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Gabon, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Land is abundant nationally but secure urban and productive access is unequal

For Gabon, extensive territory and forests coexist with urban informality, land administration and affordability barriers.

2026-10-05 World Bank — Gabon overview
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-70.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence +10.0

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-70.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-68.5× 25%= -17.1 points
Exact point calculation

18.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points

Original evidence +18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +17.2; Money-gated reading -68.5 × 25% = -17.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Gabon has unusually rich living landscapes and ecotourism potential, though ordinary access varies by location and income.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-70.1× 35%= -24.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

12.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 4.20 weighted points

Original evidence +12.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +11.2; Money-gated reading -70.1 × 35% = -24.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Gabon has unusually rich living landscapes and ecotourism potential, though ordinary access varies by location and income.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-73.3× 25%= -18.3 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -0.8; Money-gated reading -73.3 × 25% = -18.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Gabon has unusually rich living landscapes and ecotourism potential, though ordinary access varies by location and income.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-69.6× 15%= -10.4 points
Exact point calculation

14.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.10 weighted points

Original evidence +14.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +13.2; Money-gated reading -69.6 × 15% = -10.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Gabon has unusually rich living landscapes and ecotourism potential, though ordinary access varies by location and income.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -17.13 + -24.54 + -18.34 + -10.43 = -70.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +10.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: +10.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -70.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+10.8 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score+10.0 Contribution to national evidence score+0.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 4.50 + 4.20 + 0.00 + 2.10 = 10.80

Base: 10.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +10.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 10.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.60 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Gabon, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Exceptional forest and biodiversity assets support public-life potential

Gabon has unusually rich living landscapes and ecotourism potential, though ordinary access varies by location and income.

2026-10-05 World Bank — Gabon overview
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-63.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +35.0

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-63.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-61.8× 25%= -15.5 points
Exact point calculation

43.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 10.75 weighted points

Original evidence +43.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +42.2; Money-gated reading -61.8 × 25% = -15.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, the country is one of the world’s most forested nations, but infrastructure, extractive dependence and climate risks still require active stewardship.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-63.4× 35%= -22.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

37.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.95 weighted points

Original evidence +37.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +36.2; Money-gated reading -63.4 × 35% = -22.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, the country is one of the world’s most forested nations, but infrastructure, extractive dependence and climate risks still require active stewardship.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-66.6× 25%= -16.7 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +24.2; Money-gated reading -66.6 × 25% = -16.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, the country is one of the world’s most forested nations, but infrastructure, extractive dependence and climate risks still require active stewardship.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-62.9× 15%= -9.4 points
Exact point calculation

39.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.85 weighted points

Original evidence +39.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +38.2; Money-gated reading -62.9 × 15% = -9.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Gabon, the country is one of the world’s most forested nations, but infrastructure, extractive dependence and climate risks still require active stewardship.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -15.45 + -22.19 + -16.66 + -9.42 = -63.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +35.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: +35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+35.8 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score+35.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 10.75 + 12.95 + 6.25 + 5.85 = 35.80

Base: 35.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 35.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 2.10 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Gabon, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Forest wealth gives Gabon exceptional regenerative capacity

For Gabon, the country is one of the world’s most forested nations, but infrastructure, extractive dependence and climate risks still require active stewardship.

2026-10-05 World Bank — Gabon overview
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-79.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence -25.0

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-79.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-77.9× 25%= -19.5 points
Exact point calculation

-17.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -4.25 weighted points

Original evidence -17.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -17.8; Money-gated reading -77.9 × 25% = -19.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, world Bank and government reform agendas emphasize governance, social-protection and institutional effectiveness gaps.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-79.5× 35%= -27.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-23.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -8.05 weighted points

Original evidence -23.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -23.8; Money-gated reading -79.5 × 35% = -27.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, world Bank and government reform agendas emphasize governance, social-protection and institutional effectiveness gaps.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-82.7× 25%= -20.7 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.8; Money-gated reading -82.7 × 25% = -20.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, world Bank and government reform agendas emphasize governance, social-protection and institutional effectiveness gaps.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-79.0× 15%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

-21.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.15 weighted points

Original evidence -21.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -21.8; Money-gated reading -79.0 × 15% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Gabon, world Bank and government reform agendas emphasize governance, social-protection and institutional effectiveness gaps.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.48 + -27.83 + -20.69 + -11.84 = -79.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -24.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -25.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -79.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-24.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-25.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -4.25 + -8.05 + -8.75 + -3.15 = -24.20

Base: -25.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -25.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -25.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.25 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Gabon, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Governance and public-service performance remain major constraints

For Gabon, world Bank and government reform agendas emphasize governance, social-protection and institutional effectiveness gaps.

2026-10-05 World Bank — Gabon overview
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-78.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence -18.0

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-78.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-76.0× 25%= -19.0 points
Exact point calculation

-10.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -2.50 weighted points

Original evidence -10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -10.8; Money-gated reading -76.0 × 25% = -19.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, formal repair, recycling and circular-economy reach are limited relative to the country’s resource base.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-77.6× 35%= -27.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-16.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -5.60 weighted points

Original evidence -16.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -16.8; Money-gated reading -77.6 × 35% = -27.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, formal repair, recycling and circular-economy reach are limited relative to the country’s resource base.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.9× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-28.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.00 weighted points

Original evidence -28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -28.8; Money-gated reading -80.9 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Gabon, formal repair, recycling and circular-economy reach are limited relative to the country’s resource base.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-77.1× 15%= -11.6 points
Exact point calculation

-14.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -2.10 weighted points

Original evidence -14.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -14.8; Money-gated reading -77.1 × 15% = -11.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Gabon, formal repair, recycling and circular-economy reach are limited relative to the country’s resource base.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.01 + -27.17 + -20.22 + -11.56 = -78.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -17.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -18.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -78.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-17.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-18.0 Contribution to national evidence score-0.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -2.50 + -5.60 + -7.00 + -2.10 = -17.20

Base: -18.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -18.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -18.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -0.72 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Gabon, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Material circulation remains underdeveloped

For Gabon, formal repair, recycling and circular-economy reach are limited relative to the country’s resource base.

2026-10-05 World Bank — Gabon overview
6% weight International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
-73.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence 0.0

International score breakdown

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

-73.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Entry Accessibility 25%
See all nine International Welcome Entry Accessibility scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-66.4× 25%= -16.6 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -66.4 × 25% = -16.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Gabon attracts regional migrants, yet residence, work and services remain governed by formal status and payment.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Migrant Practical Life 30%
See all nine International Welcome Migrant Practical Life scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-73.1× 30%= -21.9 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -73.1 × 30% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Gabon attracts regional migrants, yet residence, work and services remain governed by formal status and payment.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome 25%
See all nine International Welcome Refugee / Neighbour Welcome scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-79.8× 25%= -20.0 points
Exact point calculation

-25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.25 weighted points

Original evidence -25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -25.0; Money-gated reading -79.8 × 25% = -20.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Gabon attracts regional migrants, yet residence, work and services remain governed by formal status and payment.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Flexibility / Continuity 20%
See all nine International Welcome Flexibility / Continuity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-73.1× 20%= -14.6 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -73.1 × 20% = -14.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Gabon attracts regional migrants, yet residence, work and services remain governed by formal status and payment.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.60 + -21.94 + -19.96 + -14.63 = -73.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: 0.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: 0.0. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -73.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal0.0 Original evidence category score0.0 Contribution to national evidence score0.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 6.25 + 0.00 + -6.25 + 0.00 = 0.00

Base: 0.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published 0.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 0.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.00 points

For Gabon, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes 0.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

Regional migration is meaningful but practical access remains documentation- and income-dependent

Gabon attracts regional migrants, yet residence, work and services remain governed by formal status and payment.

2026-10-05 World Bank — Gabon overview
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-69.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +12.5

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-69.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Positive Contribution 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-66.4× 25%= -16.6 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -66.4 × 25% = -16.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Resource exports fund the state but expose Gabon to commodity volatility and environmental tradeoffs.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-66.4× 25%= -16.6 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -66.4 × 25% = -16.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Resource exports fund the state but expose Gabon to commodity volatility and environmental tradeoffs.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-73.1× 35%= -25.6 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -73.1 × 35% = -25.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Resource exports fund the state but expose Gabon to commodity volatility and environmental tradeoffs.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Accountability / Repair 15%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-73.1× 15%= -11.0 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -73.1 × 15% = -11.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Resource exports fund the state but expose Gabon to commodity volatility and environmental tradeoffs.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.60 + -16.60 + -25.59 + -10.98 = -69.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +12.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +12.5. Money Gate ceiling: -46.3. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -69.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+12.5 Original evidence category score+12.5 Contribution to national evidence score+0.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 6.25 + 6.25 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 12.50

Base: 12.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +12.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 12.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.75 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Exported waste / garbageAudit pending
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

For Gabon, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Gabon’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

Oil dependence creates a significant external extractive footprint

Resource exports fund the state but expose Gabon to commodity volatility and environmental tradeoffs.

2026-10-05 World Bank — Gabon overview

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.