Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Pakistan 🇵🇰

Pakistan currently ranks #220 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -80.46. This territory is money-gated (3.00/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Family and weakest in Education among 14 scored of 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Tracking baselineEvidence through 5 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-80.5
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: -32.0 · Money Gate: 3.00/20 · Headline: -80.5.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#220of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

PakistanLast recorded move: down from #219 to #220.Recent recorded movements
  1. #219 → #22021 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500
  2. #218 → #21921 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500
  3. #206 → #21820 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #206 → #21020 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 75: rank 212. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 75: rank 219. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 75: rank 219. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 75: rank 218. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 75: rank 219. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 75: rank 218. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 75: rank 217. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 75: rank 218. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 75: rank 217. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 75: rank 216. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 75: rank 217. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 75: rank 216. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 75: rank 214. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 75: rank 212. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 75: rank 211. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 75: rank 210. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 75: rank 209. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 75: rank 217. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 75: rank 216. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 75: rank 215. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 75: rank 214. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 75: rank 213. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 75: rank 212. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 75: rank 211. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 75: rank 210. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 75: rank 209. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 75: rank 208. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 75: rank 207. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 75: rank 206. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 75: rank 205. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 75: rank 204. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 75: rank 203. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 75: rank 202. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 75: rank 201. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 75: rank 200. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 75: rank 199. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 75: rank 198. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 75: rank 197. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 75: rank 196. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 75: rank 195. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 75: rank 194. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 75: rank 193. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 75: rank 192. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 75: rank 191. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 45 of 75: rank 190. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 46 of 75: rank 189. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 47 of 75: rank 188. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 48 of 75: rank 187. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 49 of 75: rank 186. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 50 of 75: rank 185. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 51 of 75: rank 184. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 52 of 75: rank 183. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 53 of 75: rank 182. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 54 of 75: rank 181. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 55 of 75: rank 180. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 56 of 75: rank 179. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 57 of 75: rank 178. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 58 of 75: rank 177. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 59 of 75: rank 176. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 60 of 75: rank 175. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 61 of 75: rank 174. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 62 of 75: rank 173. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 63 of 75: rank 172. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 64 of 75: rank 171. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 65 of 75: rank 170. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 66 of 75: rank 169. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 67 of 75: rank 167. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 68 of 75: rank 166. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 69 of 75: rank 164. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 70 of 75: rank 162. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 71 of 75: rank 186. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 72 of 75: rank 206. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 73 of 75: rank 210. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 74 of 75: rank 219. 21 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500Recorded period 75 of 75: rank 220. 21 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500NOW #220Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

88%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% = 88.00% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 0 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

—

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

0.5 / 4

Food

Why 0.5 / 4?

Provincial school-meal programmes provide real free meals and take-home rations, but ordinary household food remains purchased and acute food insecurity is widespread.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
0.5 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 0.5 / 4?

Large flood-reconstruction grants and joint land ownership create a meaningful targeted no-payment route, but not universal free housing or land.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
1.3 / 4

Healthcare

Why 1.3 / 4?

Free hospitalization under Sehat Sahulat is universal in ICT, AJK and Gilgit-Baltistan and other free public programmes exist, but coverage is not uniform nationwide.

Point calculation

1.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 31.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
0.5 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.5 / 4?

Some Punjab services provide free public transport for students, women, seniors and persons with disabilities, but ordinary national transport remains fare/fuel dependent.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
0.3 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 0.3 / 4?

Emergency and development WASH/energy programmes reduce costs for targeted communities, but no national free utility baseline was verified.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
Money Gate score
  • Food0.5 / 4
  • Housing / Land0.5 / 4
  • Healthcare1.3 / 4
  • Transportation0.5 / 4
  • Water / Energy0.3 / 4
  • Money still needed17.0 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 3.0 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 0.50 + Housing / Land 0.50 + Healthcare 1.25 + Transportation 0.50 + Water / Energy 0.25 = 3.00 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
71.0 / 100
Why 71.0 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -42.04) ÷ 2 = 71.02 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-42.5
Why -42.5?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 3.00 = -42.5

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-82.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence -40.0

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-82.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.7× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-32.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.00 weighted points

Original evidence -32.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -32.8; Money-gated reading -80.7 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

The World Bank describes Pakistan as a country of about 251.3 million people where tepid growth and high population growth make poverty reduction difficult. Families remain highly dependent on income for ordinary essentials.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.4× 35%= -28.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-38.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -13.30 weighted points

Original evidence -38.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -38.8; Money-gated reading -82.4 × 35% = -28.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The World Bank describes Pakistan as a country of about 251.3 million people where tepid growth and high population growth make poverty reduction difficult. Families remain highly dependent on income for ordinary essentials.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.9× 25%= -21.5 points
Exact point calculation

-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points

Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.8; Money-gated reading -85.9 × 25% = -21.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The World Bank describes Pakistan as a country of about 251.3 million people where tepid growth and high population growth make poverty reduction difficult. Families remain highly dependent on income for ordinary essentials.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.8× 15%= -12.3 points
Exact point calculation

-36.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -5.40 weighted points

Original evidence -36.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -36.8; Money-gated reading -81.8 × 15% = -12.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The World Bank describes Pakistan as a country of about 251.3 million people where tepid growth and high population growth make poverty reduction difficult. Families remain highly dependent on income for ordinary essentials.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.17 + -28.84 + -21.46 + -12.28 = -82.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -39.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -40.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -82.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-39.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-40.0 Contribution to national evidence score-4.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -8.00 + -13.30 + -12.50 + -5.40 = -39.20

Base: -40.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -40.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -40.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -4.09 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Pakistan, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Pakistan’s researched categories, this category contributes -4.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Poverty reduction remains difficult amid high population growth

The World Bank describes Pakistan as a country of about 251.3 million people where tepid growth and high population growth make poverty reduction difficult. Families remain highly dependent on income for ordinary essentials.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Pakistan overview
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-84.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence -45.0

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-84.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.1× 25%= -20.5 points
Exact point calculation

-37.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -9.25 weighted points

Original evidence -37.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -37.8; Money-gated reading -82.1 × 25% = -20.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Pakistan, world Bank-supported Sindh reconstruction has rebuilt hundreds of thousands of flood-damaged homes and uses grants and joint land ownership, while the scale of disaster damage and ordinary housing finance show shelter is not nationally free or frictionless.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.8× 35%= -29.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-43.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -15.05 weighted points

Original evidence -43.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -43.8; Money-gated reading -83.8 × 35% = -29.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, world Bank-supported Sindh reconstruction has rebuilt hundreds of thousands of flood-damaged homes and uses grants and joint land ownership, while the scale of disaster damage and ordinary housing finance show shelter is not nationally free or frictionless.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-87.3× 25%= -21.8 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.8; Money-gated reading -87.3 × 25% = -21.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, world Bank-supported Sindh reconstruction has rebuilt hundreds of thousands of flood-damaged homes and uses grants and joint land ownership, while the scale of disaster damage and ordinary housing finance show shelter is not nationally free or frictionless.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.3× 15%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

-41.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.15 weighted points

Original evidence -41.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -41.8; Money-gated reading -83.3 × 15% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, world Bank-supported Sindh reconstruction has rebuilt hundreds of thousands of flood-damaged homes and uses grants and joint land ownership, while the scale of disaster damage and ordinary housing finance show shelter is not nationally free or frictionless.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.53 + -29.34 + -21.82 + -12.50 = -84.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -44.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -45.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -84.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-44.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-45.0 Contribution to national evidence score-4.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -9.25 + -15.05 + -13.75 + -6.15 = -44.20

Base: -45.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -45.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -45.00 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -4.09 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction.

For Pakistan, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Pakistan’s researched categories, this category contributes -4.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Large reconstruction grants help disaster-affected families but do not remove the national housing gate

For Pakistan, world Bank-supported Sindh reconstruction has rebuilt hundreds of thousands of flood-damaged homes and uses grants and joint land ownership, while the scale of disaster damage and ordinary housing finance show shelter is not nationally free or frictionless.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Building Resilience, Uplifting Communities in South Asia
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-81.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence -35.0

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-81.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-79.2× 25%= -19.8 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -27.8; Money-gated reading -79.2 × 25% = -19.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Pakistan, wFP reports 7.5 million people in Crisis food insecurity or worse and reached more than 3.3 million people in 2025 through nutrition, school meals, resilience and emergency assistance. School food is real reach but not household-wide abundance.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.0× 35%= -28.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -33.8; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 35% = -28.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, wFP reports 7.5 million people in Crisis food insecurity or worse and reached more than 3.3 million people in 2025 through nutrition, school meals, resilience and emergency assistance. School food is real reach but not household-wide abundance.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-84.4× 25%= -21.1 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.8; Money-gated reading -84.4 × 25% = -21.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, wFP reports 7.5 million people in Crisis food insecurity or worse and reached more than 3.3 million people in 2025 through nutrition, school meals, resilience and emergency assistance. School food is real reach but not household-wide abundance.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.4× 15%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

-31.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -4.65 weighted points

Original evidence -31.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -31.8; Money-gated reading -80.4 × 15% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, wFP reports 7.5 million people in Crisis food insecurity or worse and reached more than 3.3 million people in 2025 through nutrition, school meals, resilience and emergency assistance. School food is real reach but not household-wide abundance.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.81 + -28.34 + -21.10 + -12.06 = -81.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -34.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -81.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-34.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-35.0 Contribution to national evidence score-3.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -4.65 = -34.20

Base: -35.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -35.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -3.58 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Pakistan, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Pakistan’s researched categories, this category contributes -3.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

School meals are expanding while acute food insecurity remains widespread

For Pakistan, wFP reports 7.5 million people in Crisis food insecurity or worse and reached more than 3.3 million people in 2025 through nutrition, school meals, resilience and emergency assistance. School food is real reach but not household-wide abundance.

2026-10-06 World Food Programme — Pakistan
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-82.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence -40.0

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-82.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.7× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-32.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.00 weighted points

Original evidence -32.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -32.8; Money-gated reading -80.7 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Pakistan, uNICEF reports major WASH expansion, including 1.2 million people reached in 2025, while also noting tens of thousands of under-five deaths associated with poor water and sanitation. Reach is substantial but uneven.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.4× 35%= -28.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.25/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-38.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -13.30 weighted points

Original evidence -38.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -38.8; Money-gated reading -82.4 × 35% = -28.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, uNICEF reports major WASH expansion, including 1.2 million people reached in 2025, while also noting tens of thousands of under-five deaths associated with poor water and sanitation. Reach is substantial but uneven.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.9× 25%= -21.5 points
Exact point calculation

-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points

Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.8; Money-gated reading -85.9 × 25% = -21.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, uNICEF reports major WASH expansion, including 1.2 million people reached in 2025, while also noting tens of thousands of under-five deaths associated with poor water and sanitation. Reach is substantial but uneven.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.8× 15%= -12.3 points
Exact point calculation

-36.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -5.40 weighted points

Original evidence -36.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -36.8; Money-gated reading -81.8 × 15% = -12.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, uNICEF reports major WASH expansion, including 1.2 million people reached in 2025, while also noting tens of thousands of under-five deaths associated with poor water and sanitation. Reach is substantial but uneven.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.17 + -28.84 + -21.46 + -12.28 = -82.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -39.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -40.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -82.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-39.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-40.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -8.00 + -13.30 + -12.50 + -5.40 = -39.20

Base: -40.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -40.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -40.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -2.73 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Pakistan, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Pakistan’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

WASH programmes reach millions but unsafe water and sanitation still cost lives

For Pakistan, uNICEF reports major WASH expansion, including 1.2 million people reached in 2025, while also noting tens of thousands of under-five deaths associated with poor water and sanitation. Reach is substantial but uneven.

2026-10-06 UNICEF Pakistan — WASH
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-79.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence -30.0

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-79.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-77.8× 25%= -19.5 points
Exact point calculation

-22.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -5.50 weighted points

Original evidence -22.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -22.8; Money-gated reading -77.8 × 25% = -19.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

In 2026 the World Bank approved major financing to strengthen Pakistan's national transmission network and grid stability. This expands capacity, while the need for large-scale reliability reform shows household energy remains a friction point.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-79.5× 35%= -27.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.25/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-28.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -9.80 weighted points

Original evidence -28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -28.8; Money-gated reading -79.5 × 35% = -27.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

In 2026 the World Bank approved major financing to strengthen Pakistan's national transmission network and grid stability. This expands capacity, while the need for large-scale reliability reform shows household energy remains a friction point.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.0× 25%= -20.8 points
Exact point calculation

-40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.00 weighted points

Original evidence -40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -40.8; Money-gated reading -83.0 × 25% = -20.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

In 2026 the World Bank approved major financing to strengthen Pakistan's national transmission network and grid stability. This expands capacity, while the need for large-scale reliability reform shows household energy remains a friction point.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-79.0× 15%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

-26.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.90 weighted points

Original evidence -26.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -26.8; Money-gated reading -79.0 × 15% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

In 2026 the World Bank approved major financing to strengthen Pakistan's national transmission network and grid stability. This expands capacity, while the need for large-scale reliability reform shows household energy remains a friction point.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.45 + -27.84 + -20.75 + -11.84 = -79.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -29.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -30.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -79.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-29.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-30.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -5.50 + -9.80 + -10.00 + -3.90 = -29.20

Base: -30.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -30.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -30.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -1.70 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction.

For Pakistan, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Pakistan’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Grid investment targets reliability and clean-energy constraints that remain material

In 2026 the World Bank approved major financing to strengthen Pakistan's national transmission network and grid stability. This expands capacity, while the need for large-scale reliability reform shows household energy remains a friction point.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Pakistan Grid Stability Enhancement Project
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-78.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -25.0

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-78.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-76.4× 25%= -19.1 points
Exact point calculation

-17.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -4.25 weighted points

Original evidence -17.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -17.8; Money-gated reading -76.4 × 25% = -19.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Pakistan, wHO reports 138 million people had UHC service coverage by 2023, up from 87 million in 2015. Federal Sehat Sahulat restored free hospitalization for all permanent resident families in ICT, AJK and Gilgit-Baltistan in 2026, but national reach remains mixed.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-78.1× 35%= -27.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 1.25/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-23.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -8.05 weighted points

Original evidence -23.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -23.8; Money-gated reading -78.1 × 35% = -27.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, wHO reports 138 million people had UHC service coverage by 2023, up from 87 million in 2015. Federal Sehat Sahulat restored free hospitalization for all permanent resident families in ICT, AJK and Gilgit-Baltistan in 2026, but national reach remains mixed.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.5× 25%= -20.4 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.8; Money-gated reading -81.5 × 25% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, wHO reports 138 million people had UHC service coverage by 2023, up from 87 million in 2015. Federal Sehat Sahulat restored free hospitalization for all permanent resident families in ICT, AJK and Gilgit-Baltistan in 2026, but national reach remains mixed.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-77.5× 15%= -11.6 points
Exact point calculation

-21.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.15 weighted points

Original evidence -21.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -21.8; Money-gated reading -77.5 × 15% = -11.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, wHO reports 138 million people had UHC service coverage by 2023, up from 87 million in 2015. Federal Sehat Sahulat restored free hospitalization for all permanent resident families in ICT, AJK and Gilgit-Baltistan in 2026, but national reach remains mixed.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.09 + -27.33 + -20.39 + -11.63 = -78.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -24.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -25.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -78.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-24.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-25.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -4.25 + -8.05 + -8.75 + -3.15 = -24.20

Base: -25.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -25.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -25.00 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -1.99 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Pakistan, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Pakistan’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

UHC has expanded sharply but remains incomplete and geographically uneven

For Pakistan, wHO reports 138 million people had UHC service coverage by 2023, up from 87 million in 2015. Federal Sehat Sahulat restored free hospitalization for all permanent resident families in ICT, AJK and Gilgit-Baltistan in 2026, but national reach remains mixed.

2026-10-06 WHO Pakistan — UHC expansion
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-84.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence -45.0

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-84.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-82.1× 25%= -20.5 points
Exact point calculation

-37.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -9.25 weighted points

Original evidence -37.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -37.8; Money-gated reading -82.1 × 25% = -20.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Pakistan, wFP reports around 25 million out-of-school children. School meals and UNICEF learning interventions improve attendance and foundational learning, but the reach gap remains severe.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-83.8× 35%= -29.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-43.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -15.05 weighted points

Original evidence -43.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -43.8; Money-gated reading -83.8 × 35% = -29.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, wFP reports around 25 million out-of-school children. School meals and UNICEF learning interventions improve attendance and foundational learning, but the reach gap remains severe.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-87.3× 25%= -21.8 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.8; Money-gated reading -87.3 × 25% = -21.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, wFP reports around 25 million out-of-school children. School meals and UNICEF learning interventions improve attendance and foundational learning, but the reach gap remains severe.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-83.3× 15%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

-41.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.15 weighted points

Original evidence -41.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -41.8; Money-gated reading -83.3 × 15% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, wFP reports around 25 million out-of-school children. School meals and UNICEF learning interventions improve attendance and foundational learning, but the reach gap remains severe.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.53 + -29.34 + -21.82 + -12.50 = -84.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -44.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -45.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -84.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-44.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-45.0 Contribution to national evidence score-3.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -9.25 + -15.05 + -13.75 + -6.15 = -44.20

Base: -45.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -45.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -45.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -3.07 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Pakistan, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Pakistan’s researched categories, this category contributes -3.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Education capacity coexists with one of the world's largest out-of-school populations

For Pakistan, wFP reports around 25 million out-of-school children. School meals and UNICEF learning interventions improve attendance and foundational learning, but the reach gap remains severe.

2026-10-06 World Food Programme — Pakistan
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-81.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence -35.0

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-81.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-79.2× 25%= -19.8 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -27.8; Money-gated reading -79.2 × 25% = -19.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Pakistan, punjab expanded low-fare electric buses and free travel for students, women, senior citizens and persons with disabilities on participating services. These are meaningful subnational routes, not a national zero-fare transport baseline.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-81.0× 35%= -28.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -33.8; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 35% = -28.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, punjab expanded low-fare electric buses and free travel for students, women, senior citizens and persons with disabilities on participating services. These are meaningful subnational routes, not a national zero-fare transport baseline.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-84.4× 25%= -21.1 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.8; Money-gated reading -84.4 × 25% = -21.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, punjab expanded low-fare electric buses and free travel for students, women, senior citizens and persons with disabilities on participating services. These are meaningful subnational routes, not a national zero-fare transport baseline.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-80.4× 15%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

-31.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -4.65 weighted points

Original evidence -31.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -31.8; Money-gated reading -80.4 × 15% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, punjab expanded low-fare electric buses and free travel for students, women, senior citizens and persons with disabilities on participating services. These are meaningful subnational routes, not a national zero-fare transport baseline.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.81 + -28.34 + -21.10 + -12.06 = -81.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -34.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -81.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-34.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-35.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -4.65 = -34.20

Base: -35.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -35.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -1.59 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Pakistan, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Pakistan’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Targeted free fares exist while ordinary national movement remains payment-dependent

For Pakistan, punjab expanded low-fare electric buses and free travel for students, women, senior citizens and persons with disabilities on participating services. These are meaningful subnational routes, not a national zero-fare transport baseline.

2026-10-06 Punjab Portal — electric bus programme
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-69.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +7.0

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-69.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-67.2× 25%= -16.8 points
Exact point calculation

14.97 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 3.74 weighted points

Original evidence +15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +14.2; Money-gated reading -67.2 × 25% = -16.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Pakistan's 2024 TFR was 3.547 births per woman, positive under the TBF fertility agenda. Child marriage, school exclusion, food insecurity, housing shocks and uneven care reduce the lived family-environment side of the score.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-68.9× 35%= -24.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

8.97 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 3.14 weighted points

Original evidence +9.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +8.2; Money-gated reading -68.9 × 35% = -24.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Pakistan's 2024 TFR was 3.547 births per woman, positive under the TBF fertility agenda. Child marriage, school exclusion, food insecurity, housing shocks and uneven care reduce the lived family-environment side of the score.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-72.4× 25%= -18.1 points
Exact point calculation

-3.03 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -0.76 weighted points

Original evidence -3.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -3.8; Money-gated reading -72.4 × 25% = -18.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Pakistan's 2024 TFR was 3.547 births per woman, positive under the TBF fertility agenda. Child marriage, school exclusion, food insecurity, housing shocks and uneven care reduce the lived family-environment side of the score.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-68.3× 15%= -10.3 points
Exact point calculation

10.97 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 1.65 weighted points

Original evidence +11.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +10.2; Money-gated reading -68.3 × 15% = -10.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Pakistan, total fertility rate: 3.55 births per woman

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.79 + -24.12 + -18.09 + -10.25 = -69.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +7.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: +7.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -69.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+7.8 Published family-method adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score+7.0 Contribution to national evidence score+0.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 3.74 + 3.14 + -0.76 + 1.65 = 7.77

Base: 6.97 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +7.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 6.97 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 0.63 points

Why the family-method adjustment is applied

New and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Pakistan, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Pakistan’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +7.0

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Pending verification

Deduction calculation: Pending; 0 points deducted provisionally, not a verified zero

Final category calculation: +7.0 − 0 = +7.0 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Legal status not independently reviewed for this jurisdiction; no deduction is assigned. Pending is not a confirmed absence of recognition.

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Fertility remains above replacement but family pressures are substantial

Pakistan's 2024 TFR was 3.547 births per woman, positive under the TBF fertility agenda. Child marriage, school exclusion, food insecurity, housing shocks and uneven care reduce the lived family-environment side of the score.

2026-10-06 World Bank WDI via FRED — Pakistan fertility

Published indicators

Total fertility rate3.55 births per woman

World Bank WDI via FRED — Pakistan fertility · 2024

Source
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-78.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -25.0

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-78.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-76.4× 25%= -19.1 points
Exact point calculation

-17.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -4.25 weighted points

Original evidence -17.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -17.8; Money-gated reading -76.4 × 25% = -19.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Pakistan, sindh flood reconstruction promotes joint ownership of land attached to rebuilt houses, improving security for women. That positive route remains programme-specific and does not establish broad free productive-land access.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-78.1× 35%= -27.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-23.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -8.05 weighted points

Original evidence -23.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -23.8; Money-gated reading -78.1 × 35% = -27.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, sindh flood reconstruction promotes joint ownership of land attached to rebuilt houses, improving security for women. That positive route remains programme-specific and does not establish broad free productive-land access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-81.5× 25%= -20.4 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.8; Money-gated reading -81.5 × 25% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, sindh flood reconstruction promotes joint ownership of land attached to rebuilt houses, improving security for women. That positive route remains programme-specific and does not establish broad free productive-land access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-77.5× 15%= -11.6 points
Exact point calculation

-21.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.15 weighted points

Original evidence -21.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -21.8; Money-gated reading -77.5 × 15% = -11.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, sindh flood reconstruction promotes joint ownership of land attached to rebuilt houses, improving security for women. That positive route remains programme-specific and does not establish broad free productive-land access.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.09 + -27.33 + -20.39 + -11.63 = -78.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -24.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -25.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -78.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-24.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-25.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -4.25 + -8.05 + -8.75 + -3.15 = -24.20

Base: -25.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -25.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -25.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -1.42 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction.

For Pakistan, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Pakistan’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Reconstruction can strengthen household land rights, but secure access is not nationally abundant

For Pakistan, sindh flood reconstruction promotes joint ownership of land attached to rebuilt houses, improving security for women. That positive route remains programme-specific and does not establish broad free productive-land access.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Building Resilience, Uplifting Communities in South Asia
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-81.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence -35.0

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-81.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-79.2× 25%= -19.8 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -27.8; Money-gated reading -79.2 × 25% = -19.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Pakistan, the World Bank's decade-long partnership focuses on human capital, resilience and durable growth because child stunting, learning poverty, climate exposure and energy sustainability remain acute. These burdens reduce ordinary low-friction enjoyment of public life.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-81.0× 35%= -28.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -33.8; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 35% = -28.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, the World Bank's decade-long partnership focuses on human capital, resilience and durable growth because child stunting, learning poverty, climate exposure and energy sustainability remain acute. These burdens reduce ordinary low-friction enjoyment of public life.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-84.4× 25%= -21.1 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.8; Money-gated reading -84.4 × 25% = -21.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, the World Bank's decade-long partnership focuses on human capital, resilience and durable growth because child stunting, learning poverty, climate exposure and energy sustainability remain acute. These burdens reduce ordinary low-friction enjoyment of public life.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-80.4× 15%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

-31.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -4.65 weighted points

Original evidence -31.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -31.8; Money-gated reading -80.4 × 15% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, the World Bank's decade-long partnership focuses on human capital, resilience and durable growth because child stunting, learning poverty, climate exposure and energy sustainability remain acute. These burdens reduce ordinary low-friction enjoyment of public life.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.81 + -28.34 + -21.10 + -12.06 = -81.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -34.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -81.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-34.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-35.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -4.65 = -34.20

Base: -35.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -35.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -2.39 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction.

For Pakistan, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Pakistan’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Rich public and cultural life is constrained by poverty, climate shocks and uneven service reach

For Pakistan, the World Bank's decade-long partnership focuses on human capital, resilience and durable growth because child stunting, learning poverty, climate exposure and energy sustainability remain acute. These burdens reduce ordinary low-friction enjoyment of public life.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Pakistan Country Partnership Framework
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-81.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence -35.0

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-81.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-79.2× 25%= -19.8 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -27.8; Money-gated reading -79.2 × 25% = -19.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Pakistan, world Bank programmes improved flood protection for 2.3 million people and rebuilt homes and infrastructure, yet 2025 floods again damaged urban areas and agricultural land. Regeneration is active but climate pressure remains high.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-81.0× 35%= -28.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -33.8; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 35% = -28.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, world Bank programmes improved flood protection for 2.3 million people and rebuilt homes and infrastructure, yet 2025 floods again damaged urban areas and agricultural land. Regeneration is active but climate pressure remains high.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-84.4× 25%= -21.1 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.8; Money-gated reading -84.4 × 25% = -21.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, world Bank programmes improved flood protection for 2.3 million people and rebuilt homes and infrastructure, yet 2025 floods again damaged urban areas and agricultural land. Regeneration is active but climate pressure remains high.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-80.4× 15%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

-31.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -4.65 weighted points

Original evidence -31.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -31.8; Money-gated reading -80.4 × 15% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, world Bank programmes improved flood protection for 2.3 million people and rebuilt homes and infrastructure, yet 2025 floods again damaged urban areas and agricultural land. Regeneration is active but climate pressure remains high.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.81 + -28.34 + -21.10 + -12.06 = -81.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -34.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -81.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-34.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-35.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -4.65 = -34.20

Base: -35.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -35.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -2.39 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction.

For Pakistan, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Pakistan’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Flood reconstruction improves resilience while extreme climate exposure remains exceptional

For Pakistan, world Bank programmes improved flood protection for 2.3 million people and rebuilt homes and infrastructure, yet 2025 floods again damaged urban areas and agricultural land. Regeneration is active but climate pressure remains high.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Building Resilience, Uplifting Communities in South Asia
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-82.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence -40.0

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-82.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-80.7× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-32.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.00 weighted points

Original evidence -32.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -32.8; Money-gated reading -80.7 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Pakistan, uNICEF reported 110,000 children registered through health-interoperable birth registration systems in 2025. This reduces identity friction, while the broader country partnership still identifies governance, human-capital and resilience reforms as necessary.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-82.4× 35%= -28.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-38.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -13.30 weighted points

Original evidence -38.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -38.8; Money-gated reading -82.4 × 35% = -28.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, uNICEF reported 110,000 children registered through health-interoperable birth registration systems in 2025. This reduces identity friction, while the broader country partnership still identifies governance, human-capital and resilience reforms as necessary.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-85.9× 25%= -21.5 points
Exact point calculation

-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points

Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.8; Money-gated reading -85.9 × 25% = -21.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, uNICEF reported 110,000 children registered through health-interoperable birth registration systems in 2025. This reduces identity friction, while the broader country partnership still identifies governance, human-capital and resilience reforms as necessary.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-81.8× 15%= -12.3 points
Exact point calculation

-36.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -5.40 weighted points

Original evidence -36.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -36.8; Money-gated reading -81.8 × 15% = -12.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, uNICEF reported 110,000 children registered through health-interoperable birth registration systems in 2025. This reduces identity friction, while the broader country partnership still identifies governance, human-capital and resilience reforms as necessary.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.17 + -28.84 + -21.46 + -12.28 = -82.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -39.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -40.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -82.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-39.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-40.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -8.00 + -13.30 + -12.50 + -5.40 = -39.20

Base: -40.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -40.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -40.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -2.27 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Pakistan, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Pakistan’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Birth registration and social systems are improving amid major institutional and access gaps

For Pakistan, uNICEF reported 110,000 children registered through health-interoperable birth registration systems in 2025. This reduces identity friction, while the broader country partnership still identifies governance, human-capital and resilience reforms as necessary.

2026-10-06 UNICEF Pakistan Annual Report 2025
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-79.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence -30.0

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-79.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-77.8× 25%= -19.5 points
Exact point calculation

-22.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -5.50 weighted points

Original evidence -22.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -22.8; Money-gated reading -77.8 × 25% = -19.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Pakistan, sindh reconstruction has repaired or built homes and infrastructure for millions while adding flood protection and resilient construction. This is strong material-return evidence, tempered by repeated climate destruction and maintenance needs.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-79.5× 35%= -27.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-28.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -9.80 weighted points

Original evidence -28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -28.8; Money-gated reading -79.5 × 35% = -27.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, sindh reconstruction has repaired or built homes and infrastructure for millions while adding flood protection and resilient construction. This is strong material-return evidence, tempered by repeated climate destruction and maintenance needs.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.0× 25%= -20.8 points
Exact point calculation

-40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.00 weighted points

Original evidence -40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -40.8; Money-gated reading -83.0 × 25% = -20.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, sindh reconstruction has repaired or built homes and infrastructure for millions while adding flood protection and resilient construction. This is strong material-return evidence, tempered by repeated climate destruction and maintenance needs.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-79.0× 15%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

-26.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.90 weighted points

Original evidence -26.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -26.8; Money-gated reading -79.0 × 15% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Pakistan, sindh reconstruction has repaired or built homes and infrastructure for millions while adding flood protection and resilient construction. This is strong material-return evidence, tempered by repeated climate destruction and maintenance needs.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.45 + -27.84 + -20.75 + -11.84 = -79.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -29.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -30.0. Money Gate ceiling: -42.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -79.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-29.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-30.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -5.50 + -9.80 + -10.00 + -3.90 = -29.20

Base: -30.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -30.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -30.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -1.36 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Four-rail live-review judgment under Category Method 0.0.1; strong capacity cannot erase weak reach or monetary friction.

For Pakistan, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Pakistan’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Resilient rebuilding returns damaged housing and infrastructure to use

For Pakistan, sindh reconstruction has repaired or built homes and infrastructure for millions while adding flood protection and resilient construction. This is strong material-return evidence, tempered by repeated climate destruction and maintenance needs.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Building Resilience, Uplifting Communities in South Asia
6% weight · research presentInternational Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending

The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.

Country findings and sources

Pakistan remains a major refugee-hosting country under significant pressure

UNHCR describes Pakistan, together with Iran, as hosting millions of Afghan refugees and people in refugee-like situations and continues work on documentation, rights and durable solutions. This is substantial welcome evidence with current policy tensions retained as context.

2026-10-06 UNHCR — Pakistan
6% weight · research presentExternal Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending

The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Exported waste / garbageAudit pending
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

Country findings and sources

External conduct evidence is mixed and retained without a score

Pakistan's development and trade relationships create regional effects, but this live pass did not verify a sufficiently precise national non-extractive/extractive external-footprint measure for scoring. The category remains evidence-only and unresolved rather than zero-filled.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Pakistan Country Partnership Framework FY2026–2035

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.