Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Iraq 🇮🇶

Iraq currently ranks #219 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -80.27. This country is money-gated (2.50/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Family and weakest in Water among 14 scored of 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Tracking baselineEvidence through 4 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-80.3
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: -29.8 · Money Gate: 2.50/20 · Headline: -80.3.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#219of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

IraqLast recorded move: down from #218 to #219.Recent recorded movements
  1. #218 → #21921 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500
  2. #217 → #21821 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500
  3. #205 → #21720 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #205 → #20920 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 70: rank 211. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 70: rank 218. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 70: rank 218. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 70: rank 219. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 70: rank 218. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 70: rank 217. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 70: rank 216. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 70: rank 217. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 70: rank 216. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 70: rank 215. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 70: rank 216. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 70: rank 215. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 70: rank 216. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 70: rank 215. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 70: rank 214. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 70: rank 213. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 70: rank 212. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 70: rank 211. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 70: rank 210. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 70: rank 209. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 70: rank 208. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 70: rank 207. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 70: rank 206. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 70: rank 205. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 70: rank 204. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 70: rank 203. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 70: rank 202. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 70: rank 201. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 70: rank 200. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 70: rank 199. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 70: rank 198. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 70: rank 197. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 70: rank 196. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 70: rank 195. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 70: rank 194. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 70: rank 193. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 70: rank 192. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 70: rank 191. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 70: rank 190. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 70: rank 189. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 70: rank 188. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 70: rank 187. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 70: rank 186. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 70: rank 185. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 45 of 70: rank 184. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 46 of 70: rank 183. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 47 of 70: rank 182. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 48 of 70: rank 181. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 49 of 70: rank 180. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 50 of 70: rank 179. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 51 of 70: rank 178. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 52 of 70: rank 177. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 53 of 70: rank 176. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 54 of 70: rank 175. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 55 of 70: rank 174. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 56 of 70: rank 173. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 57 of 70: rank 172. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 58 of 70: rank 171. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 59 of 70: rank 170. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 60 of 70: rank 169. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 61 of 70: rank 168. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 62 of 70: rank 166. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 63 of 70: rank 165. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 64 of 70: rank 163. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 65 of 70: rank 161. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 66 of 70: rank 185. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 67 of 70: rank 205. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 68 of 70: rank 209. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 69 of 70: rank 218. 21 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500Recorded period 70 of 70: rank 219. 21 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500NOW #219Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

88%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% = 88.00% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 0 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#55

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

0.5 / 4

Food

Why 0.5 / 4?

The nationally owned School Feeding Programme provides free meals to large numbers of schoolchildren, earning the user-defined 0.5 institutional food credit.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
1.0 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 1.0 / 4?

Government programmes distribute residential plots and a 2026 initiative is preparing 4,000 free houses for poor and vulnerable families, earning one limited-route point.

Point calculation

1.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 25.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
1.0 / 4

Healthcare

Why 1.0 / 4?

Public facilities provide broad services and Iraq is expanding health insurance, but payment, uneven service availability and private workarounds prevent a stronger no-payment score.

Point calculation

1.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 25.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
0.0 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.0 / 4?

Baghdad public transport and taxis remain fare-based; temporary or event-specific free transport does not establish a national baseline.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
0.0 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 0.0 / 4?

Water scarcity, grid weakness and paid generator/electricity arrangements mean no dependable national no-payment utility baseline was verified.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
Money Gate score
  • Food0.5 / 4
  • Housing / Land1.0 / 4
  • Healthcare1.0 / 4
  • Transportation0.0 / 4
  • Water / Energy0.0 / 4
  • Money still needed17.5 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 2.5 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 0.50 + Housing / Land 1.00 + Healthcare 1.00 + Transportation 0.00 + Water / Energy 0.00 = 2.50 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
69.9 / 100
Why 69.9 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -39.84) ÷ 2 = 69.92 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-43.8
Why -43.8?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 2.50 = -43.8

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-83.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -40.0

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-83.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.1× 25%= -20.3 points
Exact point calculation

-32.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.00 weighted points

Original evidence -32.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -32.8; Money-gated reading -81.1 × 25% = -20.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Iraq’s household survey shows persistent poverty despite improvement, while WFP reports major subnational disparities; families remain exposed to repeated cash needs and uneven services.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.8× 35%= -29.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-38.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -13.30 weighted points

Original evidence -38.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -38.8; Money-gated reading -82.8 × 35% = -29.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Iraq’s household survey shows persistent poverty despite improvement, while WFP reports major subnational disparities; families remain exposed to repeated cash needs and uneven services.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-86.2× 25%= -21.5 points
Exact point calculation

-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points

Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.8; Money-gated reading -86.2 × 25% = -21.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Iraq’s household survey shows persistent poverty despite improvement, while WFP reports major subnational disparities; families remain exposed to repeated cash needs and uneven services.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.2× 15%= -12.3 points
Exact point calculation

-36.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -5.40 weighted points

Original evidence -36.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -36.8; Money-gated reading -82.2 × 15% = -12.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Iraq’s household survey shows persistent poverty despite improvement, while WFP reports major subnational disparities; families remain exposed to repeated cash needs and uneven services.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.28 + -28.98 + -21.54 + -12.33 = -83.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -39.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -40.0. Money Gate ceiling: -43.8. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -83.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-39.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-40.0 Contribution to national evidence score-4.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -8.00 + -13.30 + -12.50 + -5.40 = -39.20

Base: -40.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -40.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -40.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -4.09 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

For Iraq, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Iraq’s researched categories, this category contributes -4.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Poverty and employment pressure keep basic life dependent on cash

Iraq’s household survey shows persistent poverty despite improvement, while WFP reports major subnational disparities; families remain exposed to repeated cash needs and uneven services.

2026-10-05 Iraq Ministry of Planning — household survey results
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-84.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence -45.0

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-84.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.5× 25%= -20.6 points
Exact point calculation

-37.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -9.25 weighted points

Original evidence -37.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -37.8; Money-gated reading -82.5 × 25% = -20.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, iOM reports protracted displacement, uneven services and housing deficits, with many returnees still requiring shelter rehabilitation and durable solutions.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-84.2× 35%= -29.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 1.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-43.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -15.05 weighted points

Original evidence -43.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -43.8; Money-gated reading -84.2 × 35% = -29.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Iraq, iOM reports protracted displacement, uneven services and housing deficits, with many returnees still requiring shelter rehabilitation and durable solutions.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-87.6× 25%= -21.9 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.8; Money-gated reading -87.6 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, iOM reports protracted displacement, uneven services and housing deficits, with many returnees still requiring shelter rehabilitation and durable solutions.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.6× 15%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

-41.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.15 weighted points

Original evidence -41.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -41.8; Money-gated reading -83.6 × 15% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, iOM reports protracted displacement, uneven services and housing deficits, with many returnees still requiring shelter rehabilitation and durable solutions.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.63 + -29.47 + -21.89 + -12.54 = -84.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -44.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -45.0. Money Gate ceiling: -43.8. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -84.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-44.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-45.0 Contribution to national evidence score-4.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -9.25 + -15.05 + -13.75 + -6.15 = -44.20

Base: -45.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -45.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -45.00 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -4.09 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Iraq, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Iraq’s researched categories, this category contributes -4.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Housing deficits remain significant after years of displacement

For Iraq, iOM reports protracted displacement, uneven services and housing deficits, with many returnees still requiring shelter rehabilitation and durable solutions.

2026-10-05 IOM — Iraq Crisis Response Plan 2026
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-77.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence -20.0

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-77.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-75.5× 25%= -18.9 points
Exact point calculation

-12.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -3.00 weighted points

Original evidence -12.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -12.8; Money-gated reading -75.5 × 25% = -18.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, wFP and the Ministry of Education run the National School Feeding Programme; WFP reports national ownership and substantial school coverage, though household food is still ordinarily purchased.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-77.2× 35%= -27.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-18.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -6.30 weighted points

Original evidence -18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -18.8; Money-gated reading -77.2 × 35% = -27.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, wFP and the Ministry of Education run the National School Feeding Programme; WFP reports national ownership and substantial school coverage, though household food is still ordinarily purchased.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.5× 25%= -20.1 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.8; Money-gated reading -80.5 × 25% = -20.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Iraq, wFP and the Ministry of Education run the National School Feeding Programme; WFP reports national ownership and substantial school coverage, though household food is still ordinarily purchased.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-76.6× 15%= -11.5 points
Exact point calculation

-16.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -2.40 weighted points

Original evidence -16.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -16.8; Money-gated reading -76.6 × 15% = -11.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, wFP and the Ministry of Education run the National School Feeding Programme; WFP reports national ownership and substantial school coverage, though household food is still ordinarily purchased.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -18.87 + -27.01 + -20.13 + -11.49 = -77.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -19.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -20.0. Money Gate ceiling: -43.8. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -77.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-19.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-20.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -3.00 + -6.30 + -7.50 + -2.40 = -19.20

Base: -20.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -20.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -20.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -2.05 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Iraq, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Iraq’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

National school meals create a real free-food route

For Iraq, wFP and the Ministry of Education run the National School Feeding Programme; WFP reports national ownership and substantial school coverage, though household food is still ordinarily purchased.

2026-10-05 World Food Programme — Iraq
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-85.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence -50.0

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-85.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.9× 25%= -21.0 points
Exact point calculation

-42.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.50 weighted points

Original evidence -42.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -42.8; Money-gated reading -83.9 × 25% = -21.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The World Bank identifies the water-agriculture-poverty nexus as one of Iraq’s deepest climate-development vulnerabilities, limiting dependable household and productive water abundance.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.6× 35%= -30.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-48.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -16.80 weighted points

Original evidence -48.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -48.8; Money-gated reading -85.6 × 35% = -30.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The World Bank identifies the water-agriculture-poverty nexus as one of Iraq’s deepest climate-development vulnerabilities, limiting dependable household and productive water abundance.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-89.0× 25%= -22.2 points
Exact point calculation

-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points

Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.8; Money-gated reading -89.0 × 25% = -22.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

The World Bank identifies the water-agriculture-poverty nexus as one of Iraq’s deepest climate-development vulnerabilities, limiting dependable household and productive water abundance.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.0× 15%= -12.8 points
Exact point calculation

-46.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.90 weighted points

Original evidence -46.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -46.8; Money-gated reading -85.0 × 15% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

The World Bank identifies the water-agriculture-poverty nexus as one of Iraq’s deepest climate-development vulnerabilities, limiting dependable household and productive water abundance.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.98 + -29.96 + -22.24 + -12.76 = -85.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -49.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -50.0. Money Gate ceiling: -43.8. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -85.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-49.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-50.0 Contribution to national evidence score-3.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -10.50 + -16.80 + -15.00 + -6.90 = -49.20

Base: -50.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -50.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -50.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -3.41 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

For Iraq, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Iraq’s researched categories, this category contributes -3.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Water scarcity is a central national constraint

The World Bank identifies the water-agriculture-poverty nexus as one of Iraq’s deepest climate-development vulnerabilities, limiting dependable household and productive water abundance.

2026-10-05 World Bank — Iraq Country Climate and Development Report
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-81.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence -35.0

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-81.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-79.7× 25%= -19.9 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -27.8; Money-gated reading -79.7 × 25% = -19.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, the World Bank describes deep energy-sector inefficiencies; households often rely on paid private generation and supplemental arrangements when public supply is inadequate.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.4× 35%= -28.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -33.8; Money-gated reading -81.4 × 35% = -28.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, the World Bank describes deep energy-sector inefficiencies; households often rely on paid private generation and supplemental arrangements when public supply is inadequate.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-84.8× 25%= -21.2 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.8; Money-gated reading -84.8 × 25% = -21.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, the World Bank describes deep energy-sector inefficiencies; households often rely on paid private generation and supplemental arrangements when public supply is inadequate.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.8× 15%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

-31.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -4.65 weighted points

Original evidence -31.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -31.8; Money-gated reading -80.8 × 15% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Iraq, the World Bank describes deep energy-sector inefficiencies; households often rely on paid private generation and supplemental arrangements when public supply is inadequate.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.92 + -28.48 + -21.19 + -12.13 = -81.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -34.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -43.8. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -81.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-34.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-35.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -4.65 = -34.20

Base: -35.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -35.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -1.99 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Iraq, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Iraq’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Energy capacity is large but household reliability remains weak

For Iraq, the World Bank describes deep energy-sector inefficiencies; households often rely on paid private generation and supplemental arrangements when public supply is inadequate.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Iraq
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-78.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence -25.0

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-78.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-76.9× 25%= -19.2 points
Exact point calculation

-17.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -4.25 weighted points

Original evidence -17.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -17.8; Money-gated reading -76.9 × 25% = -19.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WHO and Iraq’s Ministry of Health report new hospitals, primary-care centres and specialized clinics, while HeRAMS monitoring documents continuing variation in operational service availability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-78.6× 35%= -27.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 1.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-23.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -8.05 weighted points

Original evidence -23.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -23.8; Money-gated reading -78.6 × 35% = -27.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WHO and Iraq’s Ministry of Health report new hospitals, primary-care centres and specialized clinics, while HeRAMS monitoring documents continuing variation in operational service availability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.9× 25%= -20.5 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.8; Money-gated reading -81.9 × 25% = -20.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WHO and Iraq’s Ministry of Health report new hospitals, primary-care centres and specialized clinics, while HeRAMS monitoring documents continuing variation in operational service availability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-78.0× 15%= -11.7 points
Exact point calculation

-21.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.15 weighted points

Original evidence -21.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -21.8; Money-gated reading -78.0 × 15% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

WHO and Iraq’s Ministry of Health report new hospitals, primary-care centres and specialized clinics, while HeRAMS monitoring documents continuing variation in operational service availability.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.22 + -27.50 + -20.49 + -11.70 = -78.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -24.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -25.0. Money Gate ceiling: -43.8. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -78.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-24.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-25.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -4.25 + -8.05 + -8.75 + -3.15 = -24.20

Base: -25.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -25.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -25.00 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -1.99 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Iraq, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Iraq’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Health infrastructure is expanding but access remains uneven

WHO and Iraq’s Ministry of Health report new hospitals, primary-care centres and specialized clinics, while HeRAMS monitoring documents continuing variation in operational service availability.

2026-10-05 WHO EMRO — World Health Day Iraq 2025
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-80.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence -30.0

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-80.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-78.3× 25%= -19.6 points
Exact point calculation

-22.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -5.50 weighted points

Original evidence -22.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -22.8; Money-gated reading -78.3 × 25% = -19.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, uNICEF reports major school-system strengthening while noting uneven outcomes; early-childhood enrollment remains very low in many areas.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-80.0× 35%= -28.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-28.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -9.80 weighted points

Original evidence -28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -28.8; Money-gated reading -80.0 × 35% = -28.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, uNICEF reports major school-system strengthening while noting uneven outcomes; early-childhood enrollment remains very low in many areas.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-83.4× 25%= -20.8 points
Exact point calculation

-40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.00 weighted points

Original evidence -40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -40.8; Money-gated reading -83.4 × 25% = -20.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, uNICEF reports major school-system strengthening while noting uneven outcomes; early-childhood enrollment remains very low in many areas.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-79.4× 15%= -11.9 points
Exact point calculation

-26.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.90 weighted points

Original evidence -26.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -26.8; Money-gated reading -79.4 × 15% = -11.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Iraq, uNICEF reports major school-system strengthening while noting uneven outcomes; early-childhood enrollment remains very low in many areas.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.57 + -27.99 + -20.84 + -11.91 = -80.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -29.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -30.0. Money Gate ceiling: -43.8. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -80.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-29.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-30.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -5.50 + -9.80 + -10.00 + -3.90 = -29.20

Base: -30.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -30.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -30.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -2.05 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Iraq, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Iraq’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Education recovery is broad but learning and early-childhood gaps remain

For Iraq, uNICEF reports major school-system strengthening while noting uneven outcomes; early-childhood enrollment remains very low in many areas.

2026-10-05 UNICEF Iraq — Education
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-78.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence -25.0

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-78.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-76.9× 25%= -19.2 points
Exact point calculation

-17.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -4.25 weighted points

Original evidence -17.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -17.8; Money-gated reading -76.9 × 25% = -19.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, baghdad’s public transport remains priced even as the state expands routes and lower-cost buses; a permanent zero-fare national baseline was not verified.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-78.6× 35%= -27.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

-23.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -8.05 weighted points

Original evidence -23.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -23.8; Money-gated reading -78.6 × 35% = -27.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, baghdad’s public transport remains priced even as the state expands routes and lower-cost buses; a permanent zero-fare national baseline was not verified.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-81.9× 25%= -20.5 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.8; Money-gated reading -81.9 × 25% = -20.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, baghdad’s public transport remains priced even as the state expands routes and lower-cost buses; a permanent zero-fare national baseline was not verified.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-78.0× 15%= -11.7 points
Exact point calculation

-21.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.15 weighted points

Original evidence -21.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -21.8; Money-gated reading -78.0 × 15% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Iraq, baghdad’s public transport remains priced even as the state expands routes and lower-cost buses; a permanent zero-fare national baseline was not verified.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.22 + -27.50 + -20.49 + -11.70 = -78.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -24.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -25.0. Money Gate ceiling: -43.8. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -78.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-24.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-25.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -4.25 + -8.05 + -8.75 + -3.15 = -24.20

Base: -25.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -25.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -25.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -1.14 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

For Iraq, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Iraq’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Ordinary urban movement remains fare-based

For Iraq, baghdad’s public transport remains priced even as the state expands routes and lower-cost buses; a permanent zero-fare national baseline was not verified.

2026-10-05 Shafaq News — Baghdad red buses and transport costs
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-70.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +3.6

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-70.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-68.8× 25%= -17.2 points
Exact point calculation

11.60 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 2.90 weighted points

Original evidence +11.6; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +10.8; Money-gated reading -68.8 × 25% = -17.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Iraq’s 2024 total fertility rate was 3.221 births per woman, producing about +53.99 fertility performance. Conflict legacy, housing deficits and service gaps lower the lived-family component, leaving a modestly positive Family Formation result.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-70.5× 35%= -24.7 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

5.60 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 1.96 weighted points

Original evidence +5.6; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +4.8; Money-gated reading -70.5 × 35% = -24.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Iraq’s 2024 total fertility rate was 3.221 births per woman, producing about +53.99 fertility performance. Conflict legacy, housing deficits and service gaps lower the lived-family component, leaving a modestly positive Family Formation result.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-73.9× 25%= -18.5 points
Exact point calculation

-6.40 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -1.60 weighted points

Original evidence -6.4; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -7.2; Money-gated reading -73.9 × 25% = -18.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Iraq’s 2024 total fertility rate was 3.221 births per woman, producing about +53.99 fertility performance. Conflict legacy, housing deficits and service gaps lower the lived-family component, leaving a modestly positive Family Formation result.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-70.0× 15%= -10.5 points
Exact point calculation

7.60 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 1.14 weighted points

Original evidence +7.6; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +6.8; Money-gated reading -70.0 × 15% = -10.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Iraq’s 2024 total fertility rate was 3.221 births per woman, producing about +53.99 fertility performance. Conflict legacy, housing deficits and service gaps lower the lived-family component, leaving a modestly positive Family Formation result.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -17.21 + -24.68 + -18.48 + -10.49 = -70.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +4.4. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: +3.6. Money Gate ceiling: -43.8. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -70.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+4.4 Published family-method adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score+3.6 Contribution to national evidence score+0.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 2.90 + 1.96 + -1.60 + 1.14 = 4.40

Base: 3.60 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +3.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 3.60 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 0.33 points

Why the family-method adjustment is applied

New and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Iraq, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Iraq’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +3.6

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: +3.6 − 0 = +3.6 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Iraq: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded in the cited legal-status review as of 2026-10-09. This is a legal-classification reading only; it does not prove demographic causation.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2026-10-09 (access date) · Reviewed: 2026-10-09

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Fertility is well above replacement but family conditions remain pressured

Iraq’s 2024 total fertility rate was 3.221 births per woman, producing about +53.99 fertility performance. Conflict legacy, housing deficits and service gaps lower the lived-family component, leaving a modestly positive Family Formation result.

2026-10-05 World Bank WDI via FRED — Iraq fertility

Published indicators

Total fertility rate3.22 births per woman

World Bank World Development Indicators via FRED · 2024

Source
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-74.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence -10.0

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-74.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-72.7× 25%= -18.2 points
Exact point calculation

-2.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -0.50 weighted points

Original evidence -2.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -2.8; Money-gated reading -72.7 × 25% = -18.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, provincial governments continue allocating residential plots, and 2026 coordination work advanced land for 4,000 free houses for poor and vulnerable families; reach remains small relative to national need.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-74.4× 35%= -26.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 1.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-8.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -2.80 weighted points

Original evidence -8.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -8.8; Money-gated reading -74.4 × 35% = -26.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, provincial governments continue allocating residential plots, and 2026 coordination work advanced land for 4,000 free houses for poor and vulnerable families; reach remains small relative to national need.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-77.7× 25%= -19.4 points
Exact point calculation

-20.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -5.00 weighted points

Original evidence -20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -20.8; Money-gated reading -77.7 × 25% = -19.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, provincial governments continue allocating residential plots, and 2026 coordination work advanced land for 4,000 free houses for poor and vulnerable families; reach remains small relative to national need.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-73.8× 15%= -11.1 points
Exact point calculation

-6.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -0.90 weighted points

Original evidence -6.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -6.8; Money-gated reading -73.8 × 15% = -11.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Iraq, provincial governments continue allocating residential plots, and 2026 coordination work advanced land for 4,000 free houses for poor and vulnerable families; reach remains small relative to national need.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -18.17 + -26.02 + -19.43 + -11.07 = -74.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -9.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -10.0. Money Gate ceiling: -43.8. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -74.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-9.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-10.0 Contribution to national evidence score-0.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -0.50 + -2.80 + -5.00 + -0.90 = -9.20

Base: -10.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -10.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -10.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -0.57 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

For Iraq, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Iraq’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Residential land distribution creates a limited non-market access route

For Iraq, provincial governments continue allocating residential plots, and 2026 coordination work advanced land for 4,000 free houses for poor and vulnerable families; reach remains small relative to national need.

2026-10-05 Iraq General Municipalities Directorate — free housing initiative
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-81.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence -35.0

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-81.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-79.7× 25%= -19.9 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -27.8; Money-gated reading -79.7 × 25% = -19.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, human Rights Watch reports continuing impunity, restrictions on expression and gaps in protection from gender-based violence despite greater overall stability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-81.4× 35%= -28.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -33.8; Money-gated reading -81.4 × 35% = -28.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, human Rights Watch reports continuing impunity, restrictions on expression and gaps in protection from gender-based violence despite greater overall stability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-84.8× 25%= -21.2 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.8; Money-gated reading -84.8 × 25% = -21.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, human Rights Watch reports continuing impunity, restrictions on expression and gaps in protection from gender-based violence despite greater overall stability.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-80.8× 15%= -12.1 points
Exact point calculation

-31.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -4.65 weighted points

Original evidence -31.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -31.8; Money-gated reading -80.8 × 15% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Iraq, human Rights Watch reports continuing impunity, restrictions on expression and gaps in protection from gender-based violence despite greater overall stability.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.92 + -28.48 + -21.19 + -12.13 = -81.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -34.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -43.8. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -81.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-34.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-35.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -4.65 = -34.20

Base: -35.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -35.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -2.39 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Iraq, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Iraq’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Security has improved but civic and family protections remain incomplete

For Iraq, human Rights Watch reports continuing impunity, restrictions on expression and gaps in protection from gender-based violence despite greater overall stability.

2026-10-05 Human Rights Watch — World Report 2026 Iraq
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-83.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -40.0

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-83.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-81.1× 25%= -20.3 points
Exact point calculation

-32.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.00 weighted points

Original evidence -32.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -32.8; Money-gated reading -81.1 × 25% = -20.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Iraq’s Green Growth Framework and national environmental strategy emphasize circular economy, nature-based solutions and resilience, while drought and heat remain severe constraints.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-82.8× 35%= -29.0 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-38.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -13.30 weighted points

Original evidence -38.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -38.8; Money-gated reading -82.8 × 35% = -29.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Iraq’s Green Growth Framework and national environmental strategy emphasize circular economy, nature-based solutions and resilience, while drought and heat remain severe constraints.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-86.2× 25%= -21.5 points
Exact point calculation

-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points

Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.8; Money-gated reading -86.2 × 25% = -21.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Iraq’s Green Growth Framework and national environmental strategy emphasize circular economy, nature-based solutions and resilience, while drought and heat remain severe constraints.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-82.2× 15%= -12.3 points
Exact point calculation

-36.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -5.40 weighted points

Original evidence -36.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -36.8; Money-gated reading -82.2 × 15% = -12.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Iraq’s Green Growth Framework and national environmental strategy emphasize circular economy, nature-based solutions and resilience, while drought and heat remain severe constraints.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.28 + -28.98 + -21.54 + -12.33 = -83.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -39.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -40.0. Money Gate ceiling: -43.8. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -83.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-39.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-40.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -8.00 + -13.30 + -12.50 + -5.40 = -39.20

Base: -40.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -40.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -40.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -2.73 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Iraq, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Iraq’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Climate and ecosystem stress are severe but regeneration planning is expanding

Iraq’s Green Growth Framework and national environmental strategy emphasize circular economy, nature-based solutions and resilience, while drought and heat remain severe constraints.

2026-10-05 UNDP — Green Growth Framework of Iraq
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-84.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence -45.0

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-84.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-82.5× 25%= -20.6 points
Exact point calculation

-37.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -9.25 weighted points

Original evidence -37.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -37.8; Money-gated reading -82.5 × 25% = -20.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, the Supreme Judicial Council confirms court fees and litigation costs, while monitoring reports identify continuing reform needs and due-process concerns.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-84.2× 35%= -29.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-43.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -15.05 weighted points

Original evidence -43.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -43.8; Money-gated reading -84.2 × 35% = -29.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, the Supreme Judicial Council confirms court fees and litigation costs, while monitoring reports identify continuing reform needs and due-process concerns.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-87.6× 25%= -21.9 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.8; Money-gated reading -87.6 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Iraq, the Supreme Judicial Council confirms court fees and litigation costs, while monitoring reports identify continuing reform needs and due-process concerns.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-83.6× 15%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

-41.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.15 weighted points

Original evidence -41.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -41.8; Money-gated reading -83.6 × 15% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Iraq, the Supreme Judicial Council confirms court fees and litigation costs, while monitoring reports identify continuing reform needs and due-process concerns.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.63 + -29.47 + -21.89 + -12.54 = -84.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -44.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -45.0. Money Gate ceiling: -43.8. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -84.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-44.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-45.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -9.25 + -15.05 + -13.75 + -6.15 = -44.20

Base: -45.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -45.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -45.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -2.56 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Iraq, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Iraq’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Court access is formally guaranteed but fees and due-process concerns remain

For Iraq, the Supreme Judicial Council confirms court fees and litigation costs, while monitoring reports identify continuing reform needs and due-process concerns.

2026-10-05 Iraq Supreme Judicial Council — Court Expenses
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-78.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence -25.0

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-78.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-76.9× 25%= -19.2 points
Exact point calculation

-17.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -4.25 weighted points

Original evidence -17.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -17.8; Money-gated reading -76.9 × 25% = -19.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Iraq’s climate investment and environmental plans call for recycling, waste-to-energy and circular-economy systems, but these remain developing rather than ordinary household repair infrastructure.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-78.6× 35%= -27.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-23.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -8.05 weighted points

Original evidence -23.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -23.8; Money-gated reading -78.6 × 35% = -27.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Iraq’s climate investment and environmental plans call for recycling, waste-to-energy and circular-economy systems, but these remain developing rather than ordinary household repair infrastructure.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.9× 25%= -20.5 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.8; Money-gated reading -81.9 × 25% = -20.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Iraq’s climate investment and environmental plans call for recycling, waste-to-energy and circular-economy systems, but these remain developing rather than ordinary household repair infrastructure.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-78.0× 15%= -11.7 points
Exact point calculation

-21.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.15 weighted points

Original evidence -21.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -21.8; Money-gated reading -78.0 × 15% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Iraq’s climate investment and environmental plans call for recycling, waste-to-energy and circular-economy systems, but these remain developing rather than ordinary household repair infrastructure.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.22 + -27.50 + -20.49 + -11.70 = -78.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -24.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -25.0. Money Gate ceiling: -43.8. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -78.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-24.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-25.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -4.25 + -8.05 + -8.75 + -3.15 = -24.20

Base: -25.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -25.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -25.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -1.14 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Iraq, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Iraq’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Circular-economy ambitions are growing from a low material-return base

Iraq’s climate investment and environmental plans call for recycling, waste-to-energy and circular-economy systems, but these remain developing rather than ordinary household repair infrastructure.

2026-10-05 UNDP — Iraq environmental strategy 2024–2030
6% weight · research presentInternational Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending

The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.

Country findings and sources

Large return and displacement flows keep human welcome a live challenge

For Iraq, iOM identified nearly five million returnees by the end of 2025 while substantial displacement and reintegration needs persisted.

2026-10-05 IOM Iraq DTM Master List R135
6% weight · research presentExternal Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending

The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.

Material transfers: scored in International Footprint

Exporter responsibility: -50.00/100 (15% of footprint); importer responsibility: 15.00/100 (15% of footprint). Material movement is a real workload; these are TBF authored judgments, not certified illegal dumping estimates. Each role is included ONCE in the Footprint 3.1 published score.

Exported waste / garbageRole: -50.00/100 · scored

Türkiye reported imports of 51,914,800 kg plastic waste/scrap from Iraq in 2024 (partner-reported data).

2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade (HS 3915 or 630900) · View source ↗

The cited HS trade flow establishes an import/export signal. It does not establish contamination, unusability, negligent treatment, illegal shipment, injury, receiving-facility performance, or country-attributable harm.

Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingRole: -50.00/100 · scored

Chile reported imports of 400,800 kg worn clothing/articles from Iraq in 2024 (partner-reported data).

2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade (HS 3915 or 630900) · View source ↗

The cited HS trade flow establishes an import/export signal. It does not establish contamination, unusability, negligent treatment, illegal shipment, injury, receiving-facility performance, or country-attributable harm.

Accepted imported garbageRole: 15.00/100 · scored

3,192,220 kg plastic waste/scrap imported in 2024; Saudi Arabia was the leading reported source.

2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade (HS 3915 or 630900) · View source ↗

The cited HS trade flow establishes an import/export signal. It does not establish contamination, unusability, negligent treatment, illegal shipment, injury, receiving-facility performance, or country-attributable harm.

Accepted low-utility dumpingRole: 15.00/100 · scored

29,894,100 kg worn clothing/articles imported in 2024, especially from China and UAE.

2024 trade data · checked 2026-10-11 · World Bank WITS / UN Comtrade (HS 3915 or 630900) · View source ↗

The cited HS trade flow establishes an import/export signal. It does not establish contamination, unusability, negligent treatment, illegal shipment, injury, receiving-facility performance, or country-attributable harm.

The material-transfer burden already affects the published score. Facility-specific downstream harm remains a separate research claim. No second penalty is added for the same trade.

Country findings and sources

External reconstruction and oil dependence create mixed global effects

Iraq is rebuilding through international partnerships while remaining highly oil-dependent; this evidence-only category is retained without a production score.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Iraq

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.