Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Egypt 🇪🇬

Egypt currently ranks #206 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -73.57. This country is money-gated (2.00/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Welcome and weakest in Land across 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Tracking baselineEvidence through 10 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-73.6
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: -3.9 · Money Gate: 2.00/20 · Headline: -73.6.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#206of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

EgyptLast recorded move: down from #205 to #206.Recent recorded movements
  1. #205 → #20621 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500
  2. #204 → #20521 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500
  3. #193 → #20420 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #193 → #19620 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 77: rank 201. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 77: rank 207. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 77: rank 207. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 77: rank 208. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 77: rank 206. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 77: rank 205. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 77: rank 204. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 77: rank 205. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 77: rank 204. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 77: rank 203. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 77: rank 204. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 77: rank 205. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 77: rank 204. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 77: rank 203. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 77: rank 201. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 77: rank 200. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 77: rank 199. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 77: rank 198. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 77: rank 204. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 77: rank 205. 14 Oct 2026 · 17:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 77: rank 206. 18 Oct 2026 · 11:57 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 11:57 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 77: rank 205. 18 Oct 2026 · 11:57 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 77: rank 204. 18 Oct 2026 · 11:57 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 77: rank 203. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 77: rank 202. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 77: rank 201. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 77: rank 200. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 77: rank 199. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 77: rank 198. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 77: rank 197. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 77: rank 196. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 77: rank 195. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 77: rank 194. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 77: rank 193. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 77: rank 192. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 77: rank 191. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 77: rank 190. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 77: rank 189. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 77: rank 188. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 77: rank 187. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 77: rank 186. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 77: rank 185. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 77: rank 184. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 77: rank 183. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 45 of 77: rank 182. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 46 of 77: rank 181. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 47 of 77: rank 180. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 48 of 77: rank 179. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 49 of 77: rank 178. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 50 of 77: rank 177. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 51 of 77: rank 176. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 52 of 77: rank 175. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 53 of 77: rank 174. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 54 of 77: rank 173. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 55 of 77: rank 172. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 56 of 77: rank 171. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 57 of 77: rank 170. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 58 of 77: rank 169. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 59 of 77: rank 168. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 60 of 77: rank 167. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 61 of 77: rank 166. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 62 of 77: rank 165. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 63 of 77: rank 164. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 64 of 77: rank 163. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 65 of 77: rank 162. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 66 of 77: rank 161. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 67 of 77: rank 160. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 68 of 77: rank 159. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 69 of 77: rank 157. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 70 of 77: rank 156. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 71 of 77: rank 154. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 72 of 77: rank 152. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 73 of 77: rank 176. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 74 of 77: rank 193. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 75 of 77: rank 196. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 76 of 77: rank 205. 21 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500Recorded period 77 of 77: rank 206. 21 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500NOW #206Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

97%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 76.0% + 6.0 × 76.0% = 97.12% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#43

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

0.5 / 4

Food

Why 0.5 / 4?

The national school-meals programme creates a direct no-payment food route for students, earning the user-defined 0.5 institutional credit.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
0.0 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 0.0 / 4?

Large social-housing and land programmes are subsidized or allocation/finance based; no broad ordinary free housing or land route was verified.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
1.5 / 4

Healthcare

Why 1.5 / 4?

Universal Health Insurance provides major financial protection and capped copayments, but contributions, enrollment and copayments mean care is not a full no-payment baseline.

Point calculation

1.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 37.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
0.0 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.0 / 4?

Cairo Metro and other ordinary public transport remain fare-based in 2026.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
0.0 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 0.0 / 4?

Electricity is heavily subsidized and infrastructure is broad, but household energy and water remain billed services.

Point calculation

0.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 0.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Sources for this gate
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-05
Money Gate score
  • Food0.5 / 4
  • Housing / Land0.0 / 4
  • Healthcare1.5 / 4
  • Transportation0.0 / 4
  • Water / Energy0.0 / 4
  • Money still needed18.0 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 2.0 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 0.50 + Housing / Land 0.00 + Healthcare 1.50 + Transportation 0.00 + Water / Energy 0.00 = 2.00 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
59.0 / 100
Why 59.0 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -17.96) ÷ 2 = 58.98 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-45.0
Why -45.0?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 2.00 = -45.0

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-79.4↓

Money-gated · Evidence -25.0

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-79.4Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-77.4× 25%= -19.4 points
Exact point calculation

-17.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -4.25 weighted points

Original evidence -17.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -17.8; Money-gated reading -77.4 × 25% = -19.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Egypt, world Bank reporting shows high recent inflation and substantial national poverty, so families still need repeated cash income to retain ordinary food, housing, transport and care.

For Egypt, world Bank reporting shows high recent inflation and substantial national poverty, so families still need repeated cash income to retain ordinary food, housing, transport and care.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-79.0× 35%= -27.7 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-23.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -8.05 weighted points

Original evidence -23.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -23.8; Money-gated reading -79.0 × 35% = -27.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, world Bank reporting shows high recent inflation and substantial national poverty, so families still need repeated cash income to retain ordinary food, housing, transport and care.

For Egypt, world Bank reporting shows high recent inflation and substantial national poverty, so families still need repeated cash income to retain ordinary food, housing, transport and care.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.3× 25%= -20.6 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.8; Money-gated reading -82.3 × 25% = -20.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, world Bank reporting shows high recent inflation and substantial national poverty, so families still need repeated cash income to retain ordinary food, housing, transport and care.

For Egypt, world Bank reporting shows high recent inflation and substantial national poverty, so families still need repeated cash income to retain ordinary food, housing, transport and care.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-78.5× 15%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

-21.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.15 weighted points

Original evidence -21.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -21.8; Money-gated reading -78.5 × 15% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, world Bank reporting shows high recent inflation and substantial national poverty, so families still need repeated cash income to retain ordinary food, housing, transport and care.

For Egypt, world Bank reporting shows high recent inflation and substantial national poverty, so families still need repeated cash income to retain ordinary food, housing, transport and care.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.35 + -27.67 + -20.59 + -11.77 = -79.4

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -24.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -25.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -79.4.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-24.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-25.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -4.25 + -8.05 + -8.75 + -3.15 = -24.20

Base: -25.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -25.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -25.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = -2.32 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Egypt, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — human-time-burden domestic evidence retained

For Egypt, world Bank reporting shows high recent inflation and substantial national poverty, so families still need repeated cash income to retain ordinary food, housing, transport and care.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Egypt
Inflation and poverty keep household cash pressure high

For Egypt, world Bank reporting shows high recent inflation and substantial national poverty, so families still need repeated cash income to retain ordinary food, housing, transport and care.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Egypt
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-82.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -35.0

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-82.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.1× 25%= -20.0 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -27.8; Money-gated reading -80.1 × 25% = -20.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Housing for All Egyptians has delivered large volumes of housing for low- and middle-income households, but access is still application, reservation and finance mediated rather than an ordinary no-payment shelter baseline.

Housing for All Egyptians has delivered large volumes of housing for low- and middle-income households, but access is still application, reservation and finance mediated rather than an ordinary no-payment shelter baseline.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.8× 35%= -28.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -33.8; Money-gated reading -81.8 × 35% = -28.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Housing for All Egyptians has delivered large volumes of housing for low- and middle-income households, but access is still application, reservation and finance mediated rather than an ordinary no-payment shelter baseline.

Housing for All Egyptians has delivered large volumes of housing for low- and middle-income households, but access is still application, reservation and finance mediated rather than an ordinary no-payment shelter baseline.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.1× 25%= -21.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.8; Money-gated reading -85.1 × 25% = -21.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Housing for All Egyptians has delivered large volumes of housing for low- and middle-income households, but access is still application, reservation and finance mediated rather than an ordinary no-payment shelter baseline.

Housing for All Egyptians has delivered large volumes of housing for low- and middle-income households, but access is still application, reservation and finance mediated rather than an ordinary no-payment shelter baseline.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.2× 15%= -12.2 points
Exact point calculation

-31.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -4.65 weighted points

Original evidence -31.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -31.8; Money-gated reading -81.2 × 15% = -12.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Housing for All Egyptians has delivered large volumes of housing for low- and middle-income households, but access is still application, reservation and finance mediated rather than an ordinary no-payment shelter baseline.

Housing for All Egyptians has delivered large volumes of housing for low- and middle-income households, but access is still application, reservation and finance mediated rather than an ordinary no-payment shelter baseline.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.04 + -28.63 + -21.27 + -12.19 = -82.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -34.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -82.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-34.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-35.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -4.65 = -34.20

Base: -35.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -35.00 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = -2.88 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

For Egypt, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — housing-shelter-reach domestic evidence retained

Housing for All Egyptians has delivered large volumes of housing for low- and middle-income households, but access is still application, reservation and finance mediated rather than an ordinary no-payment shelter baseline.

2026-10-05 Egypt State Information Service — Housing for All Egyptians
Large social-housing supply expands capacity but remains reservation and ownership based

Housing for All Egyptians has delivered large volumes of housing for low- and middle-income households, but access is still application, reservation and finance mediated rather than an ordinary no-payment shelter baseline.

2026-10-05 Egypt State Information Service — Housing for All Egyptians
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-78.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence -20.0

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-78.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-76.0× 25%= -19.0 points
Exact point calculation

-12.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -3.00 weighted points

Original evidence -12.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -12.8; Money-gated reading -76.0 × 25% = -19.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WFP complements Egypt’s national school-meals programme with fortified in-school snacks and linked support. This earns institutional free-food credit but household food remains predominantly purchased.

WFP complements Egypt’s national school-meals programme with fortified in-school snacks and linked support. This earns institutional free-food credit but household food remains predominantly purchased.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-77.7× 35%= -27.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-18.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -6.30 weighted points

Original evidence -18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -18.8; Money-gated reading -77.7 × 35% = -27.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WFP complements Egypt’s national school-meals programme with fortified in-school snacks and linked support. This earns institutional free-food credit but household food remains predominantly purchased.

WFP complements Egypt’s national school-meals programme with fortified in-school snacks and linked support. This earns institutional free-food credit but household food remains predominantly purchased.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.0× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.8; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

WFP complements Egypt’s national school-meals programme with fortified in-school snacks and linked support. This earns institutional free-food credit but household food remains predominantly purchased.

WFP complements Egypt’s national school-meals programme with fortified in-school snacks and linked support. This earns institutional free-food credit but household food remains predominantly purchased.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-77.1× 15%= -11.6 points
Exact point calculation

-16.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -2.40 weighted points

Original evidence -16.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -16.8; Money-gated reading -77.1 × 15% = -11.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

WFP complements Egypt’s national school-meals programme with fortified in-school snacks and linked support. This earns institutional free-food credit but household food remains predominantly purchased.

WFP complements Egypt’s national school-meals programme with fortified in-school snacks and linked support. This earns institutional free-food credit but household food remains predominantly purchased.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.01 + -27.18 + -20.24 + -11.57 = -78.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -19.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -20.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -78.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-19.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-20.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -3.00 + -6.30 + -7.50 + -2.40 = -19.20

Base: -20.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -20.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -20.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = -1.85 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Egypt, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — food-nourishment-free-food domestic evidence retained

WFP complements Egypt’s national school-meals programme with fortified in-school snacks and linked support. This earns institutional free-food credit but household food remains predominantly purchased.

2026-10-05 World Food Programme — Egypt
National school meals provide a direct free-food route

WFP complements Egypt’s national school-meals programme with fortified in-school snacks and linked support. This earns institutional free-food credit but household food remains predominantly purchased.

2026-10-05 World Food Programme — Egypt
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-71.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +5.0

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-71.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-69.1× 25%= -17.3 points
Exact point calculation

13.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 3.25 weighted points

Original evidence +13.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +12.2; Money-gated reading -69.1 × 25% = -17.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Egypt has major water and sanitation infrastructure, while World Bank work still highlights water scarcity, climate adaptation and financial sustainability as active constraints.

Egypt has major water and sanitation infrastructure, while World Bank work still highlights water scarcity, climate adaptation and financial sustainability as active constraints.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-70.8× 35%= -24.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

7.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 2.45 weighted points

Original evidence +7.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +6.2; Money-gated reading -70.8 × 35% = -24.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Egypt has major water and sanitation infrastructure, while World Bank work still highlights water scarcity, climate adaptation and financial sustainability as active constraints.

Egypt has major water and sanitation infrastructure, while World Bank work still highlights water scarcity, climate adaptation and financial sustainability as active constraints.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-74.1× 25%= -18.5 points
Exact point calculation

-5.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -1.25 weighted points

Original evidence -5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -5.8; Money-gated reading -74.1 × 25% = -18.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Egypt has major water and sanitation infrastructure, while World Bank work still highlights water scarcity, climate adaptation and financial sustainability as active constraints.

Egypt has major water and sanitation infrastructure, while World Bank work still highlights water scarcity, climate adaptation and financial sustainability as active constraints.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-70.2× 15%= -10.5 points
Exact point calculation

9.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 1.35 weighted points

Original evidence +9.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +8.2; Money-gated reading -70.2 × 15% = -10.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Egypt has major water and sanitation infrastructure, while World Bank work still highlights water scarcity, climate adaptation and financial sustainability as active constraints.

Egypt has major water and sanitation infrastructure, while World Bank work still highlights water scarcity, climate adaptation and financial sustainability as active constraints.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -17.29 + -24.78 + -18.52 + -10.54 = -71.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +5.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: +5.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -71.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+5.8 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score+5.0 Contribution to national evidence score+0.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 3.25 + 2.45 + -1.25 + 1.35 = 5.80

Base: 5.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +5.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 5.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 0.31 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Egypt, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — water-sanitation domestic evidence retained

Egypt has major water and sanitation infrastructure, while World Bank work still highlights water scarcity, climate adaptation and financial sustainability as active constraints.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Egypt overview
Water and sanitation coverage is substantial but scarcity and financing remain material

Egypt has major water and sanitation infrastructure, while World Bank work still highlights water scarcity, climate adaptation and financial sustainability as active constraints.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Egypt overview
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-69.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +10.0

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-69.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-67.8× 25%= -16.9 points
Exact point calculation

18.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points

Original evidence +18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +17.2; Money-gated reading -67.8 × 25% = -16.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Egypt’s 2026 household tariff system keeps the first bracket stable and subsidizes much of generation cost, yet households still receive bills and pay a share of cost; subsidy is not a no-payment baseline.

Egypt’s 2026 household tariff system keeps the first bracket stable and subsidizes much of generation cost, yet households still receive bills and pay a share of cost; subsidy is not a no-payment baseline.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-69.4× 35%= -24.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

12.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 4.20 weighted points

Original evidence +12.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +11.2; Money-gated reading -69.4 × 35% = -24.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Egypt’s 2026 household tariff system keeps the first bracket stable and subsidizes much of generation cost, yet households still receive bills and pay a share of cost; subsidy is not a no-payment baseline.

Egypt’s 2026 household tariff system keeps the first bracket stable and subsidizes much of generation cost, yet households still receive bills and pay a share of cost; subsidy is not a no-payment baseline.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-72.7× 25%= -18.2 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -0.8; Money-gated reading -72.7 × 25% = -18.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Egypt’s 2026 household tariff system keeps the first bracket stable and subsidizes much of generation cost, yet households still receive bills and pay a share of cost; subsidy is not a no-payment baseline.

Egypt’s 2026 household tariff system keeps the first bracket stable and subsidizes much of generation cost, yet households still receive bills and pay a share of cost; subsidy is not a no-payment baseline.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-68.9× 15%= -10.3 points
Exact point calculation

14.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.10 weighted points

Original evidence +14.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +13.2; Money-gated reading -68.9 × 15% = -10.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Egypt’s 2026 household tariff system keeps the first bracket stable and subsidizes much of generation cost, yet households still receive bills and pay a share of cost; subsidy is not a no-payment baseline.

Egypt’s 2026 household tariff system keeps the first bracket stable and subsidizes much of generation cost, yet households still receive bills and pay a share of cost; subsidy is not a no-payment baseline.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.94 + -24.30 + -18.18 + -10.33 = -69.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +10.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: +10.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -69.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+10.8 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score+10.0 Contribution to national evidence score+0.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 4.50 + 4.20 + 0.00 + 2.10 = 10.80

Base: 10.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +10.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 10.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 0.51 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

For Egypt, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — energy-household-capability domestic evidence retained

Egypt’s 2026 household tariff system keeps the first bracket stable and subsidizes much of generation cost, yet households still receive bills and pay a share of cost; subsidy is not a no-payment baseline.

2026-10-05 Egypt State Information Service — electricity tariffs
Electricity is heavily subsidized but remains a billed household service

Egypt’s 2026 household tariff system keeps the first bracket stable and subsidizes much of generation cost, yet households still receive bills and pay a share of cost; subsidy is not a no-payment baseline.

2026-10-05 Egypt State Information Service — electricity tariffs
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-71.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +5.0

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-71.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-69.1× 25%= -17.3 points
Exact point calculation

13.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 3.25 weighted points

Original evidence +13.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +12.2; Money-gated reading -69.1 × 25% = -17.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, the UHI system caps some surgical copayments and expands coverage, but eligibility ordinarily depends on enrollment and paid contributions, and rollout is still expanding across governorates.

For Egypt, the UHI system caps some surgical copayments and expands coverage, but eligibility ordinarily depends on enrollment and paid contributions, and rollout is still expanding across governorates.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-70.8× 35%= -24.8 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 1.50/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

7.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 2.45 weighted points

Original evidence +7.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +6.2; Money-gated reading -70.8 × 35% = -24.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, the UHI system caps some surgical copayments and expands coverage, but eligibility ordinarily depends on enrollment and paid contributions, and rollout is still expanding across governorates.

For Egypt, the UHI system caps some surgical copayments and expands coverage, but eligibility ordinarily depends on enrollment and paid contributions, and rollout is still expanding across governorates.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-74.1× 25%= -18.5 points
Exact point calculation

-5.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -1.25 weighted points

Original evidence -5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -5.8; Money-gated reading -74.1 × 25% = -18.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, the UHI system caps some surgical copayments and expands coverage, but eligibility ordinarily depends on enrollment and paid contributions, and rollout is still expanding across governorates.

For Egypt, the UHI system caps some surgical copayments and expands coverage, but eligibility ordinarily depends on enrollment and paid contributions, and rollout is still expanding across governorates.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-70.2× 15%= -10.5 points
Exact point calculation

9.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 1.35 weighted points

Original evidence +9.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +8.2; Money-gated reading -70.2 × 15% = -10.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Egypt, the UHI system caps some surgical copayments and expands coverage, but eligibility ordinarily depends on enrollment and paid contributions, and rollout is still expanding across governorates.

For Egypt, the UHI system caps some surgical copayments and expands coverage, but eligibility ordinarily depends on enrollment and paid contributions, and rollout is still expanding across governorates.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -17.29 + -24.78 + -18.52 + -10.54 = -71.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +5.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: +5.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -71.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+5.8 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score+5.0 Contribution to national evidence score+0.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 3.25 + 2.45 + -1.25 + 1.35 = 5.80

Base: 5.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +5.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 5.00 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 0.36 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Egypt, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — health-care-reach domestic evidence retained

For Egypt, the UHI system caps some surgical copayments and expands coverage, but eligibility ordinarily depends on enrollment and paid contributions, and rollout is still expanding across governorates.

2026-10-05 Universal Health Insurance Authority — Egypt
Universal Health Insurance expands protection but access remains contribution and copayment mediated

For Egypt, the UHI system caps some surgical copayments and expands coverage, but eligibility ordinarily depends on enrollment and paid contributions, and rollout is still expanding across governorates.

2026-10-05 Universal Health Insurance Authority — Egypt
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-69.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +10.0

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-69.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-67.8× 25%= -16.9 points
Exact point calculation

18.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points

Original evidence +18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +17.2; Money-gated reading -67.8 × 25% = -16.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, public schooling has wide reach and major reform investment, though learning quality, household costs and geographic inequality still create capability gaps.

For Egypt, public schooling has wide reach and major reform investment, though learning quality, household costs and geographic inequality still create capability gaps.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-69.4× 35%= -24.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

12.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 4.20 weighted points

Original evidence +12.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +11.2; Money-gated reading -69.4 × 35% = -24.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, public schooling has wide reach and major reform investment, though learning quality, household costs and geographic inequality still create capability gaps.

For Egypt, public schooling has wide reach and major reform investment, though learning quality, household costs and geographic inequality still create capability gaps.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-72.7× 25%= -18.2 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -0.8; Money-gated reading -72.7 × 25% = -18.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, public schooling has wide reach and major reform investment, though learning quality, household costs and geographic inequality still create capability gaps.

For Egypt, public schooling has wide reach and major reform investment, though learning quality, household costs and geographic inequality still create capability gaps.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-68.9× 15%= -10.3 points
Exact point calculation

14.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.10 weighted points

Original evidence +14.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +13.2; Money-gated reading -68.9 × 15% = -10.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Egypt, public schooling has wide reach and major reform investment, though learning quality, household costs and geographic inequality still create capability gaps.

For Egypt, public schooling has wide reach and major reform investment, though learning quality, household costs and geographic inequality still create capability gaps.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.94 + -24.30 + -18.18 + -10.33 = -69.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +10.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: +10.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -69.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+10.8 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score+10.0 Contribution to national evidence score+0.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 4.50 + 4.20 + 0.00 + 2.10 = 10.80

Base: 10.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +10.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 10.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 0.62 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Egypt, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — education-human-capability domestic evidence retained

For Egypt, public schooling has wide reach and major reform investment, though learning quality, household costs and geographic inequality still create capability gaps.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Egypt
Large public education system is receiving major quality investment

For Egypt, public schooling has wide reach and major reform investment, though learning quality, household costs and geographic inequality still create capability gaps.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Egypt
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-75.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence -10.0

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-75.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-73.3× 25%= -18.3 points
Exact point calculation

-2.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -0.50 weighted points

Original evidence -2.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -2.8; Money-gated reading -73.3 × 25% = -18.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, the official 2026 fare schedule charges passengers by distance; discounts and subscriptions reduce friction but do not make ordinary mobility free.

For Egypt, the official 2026 fare schedule charges passengers by distance; discounts and subscriptions reduce friction but do not make ordinary mobility free.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-74.9× 35%= -26.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

-8.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -2.80 weighted points

Original evidence -8.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -8.8; Money-gated reading -74.9 × 35% = -26.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, the official 2026 fare schedule charges passengers by distance; discounts and subscriptions reduce friction but do not make ordinary mobility free.

For Egypt, the official 2026 fare schedule charges passengers by distance; discounts and subscriptions reduce friction but do not make ordinary mobility free.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-78.2× 25%= -19.6 points
Exact point calculation

-20.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -5.00 weighted points

Original evidence -20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -20.8; Money-gated reading -78.2 × 25% = -19.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, the official 2026 fare schedule charges passengers by distance; discounts and subscriptions reduce friction but do not make ordinary mobility free.

For Egypt, the official 2026 fare schedule charges passengers by distance; discounts and subscriptions reduce friction but do not make ordinary mobility free.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-74.4× 15%= -11.2 points
Exact point calculation

-6.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -0.90 weighted points

Original evidence -6.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -6.8; Money-gated reading -74.4 × 15% = -11.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Egypt, the official 2026 fare schedule charges passengers by distance; discounts and subscriptions reduce friction but do not make ordinary mobility free.

For Egypt, the official 2026 fare schedule charges passengers by distance; discounts and subscriptions reduce friction but do not make ordinary mobility free.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -18.32 + -26.22 + -19.56 + -11.15 = -75.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -9.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -10.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -75.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-9.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-10.0 Contribution to national evidence score-0.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -0.50 + -2.80 + -5.00 + -0.90 = -9.20

Base: -10.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -10.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -10.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = -0.41 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Egypt, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — mobility-reachability domestic evidence retained

For Egypt, the official 2026 fare schedule charges passengers by distance; discounts and subscriptions reduce friction but do not make ordinary mobility free.

2026-10-05 Cairo Governorate — Metro tickets
Cairo metro is extensive but ordinary trips remain fare-based

For Egypt, the official 2026 fare schedule charges passengers by distance; discounts and subscriptions reduce friction but do not make ordinary mobility free.

2026-10-05 Cairo Governorate — Metro tickets
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-69.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +10.6

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-69.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-67.6× 25%= -16.9 points
Exact point calculation

18.57 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 4.64 weighted points

Original evidence +18.6; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +17.8; Money-gated reading -67.6 × 25% = -16.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Egypt’s 2024 TFR is 2.735, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal. Housing, inflation, care and work-income pressures still reduce the lived family-environment component.

Egypt’s 2024 TFR is 2.735, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal. Housing, inflation, care and work-income pressures still reduce the lived family-environment component.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-69.3× 35%= -24.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

12.57 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 4.40 weighted points

Original evidence +12.6; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +11.8; Money-gated reading -69.3 × 35% = -24.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Egypt’s 2024 TFR is 2.735, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal. Housing, inflation, care and work-income pressures still reduce the lived family-environment component.

Egypt’s 2024 TFR is 2.735, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal. Housing, inflation, care and work-income pressures still reduce the lived family-environment component.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-72.6× 25%= -18.1 points
Exact point calculation

0.57 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.14 weighted points

Original evidence +0.6; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -0.2; Money-gated reading -72.6 × 25% = -18.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Egypt’s 2024 TFR is 2.735, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal. Housing, inflation, care and work-income pressures still reduce the lived family-environment component.

Egypt’s 2024 TFR is 2.735, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal. Housing, inflation, care and work-income pressures still reduce the lived family-environment component.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-68.7× 15%= -10.3 points
Exact point calculation

14.57 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.19 weighted points

Original evidence +14.6; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +13.8; Money-gated reading -68.7 × 15% = -10.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Egypt’s 2024 TFR is 2.735, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal. Housing, inflation, care and work-income pressures still reduce the lived family-environment component.

Egypt’s 2024 TFR is 2.735, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal. Housing, inflation, care and work-income pressures still reduce the lived family-environment component.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.90 + -24.24 + -18.14 + -10.31 = -69.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +11.4. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: +10.6. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -69.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+11.4 Published family-method adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score+10.6 Contribution to national evidence score+0.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 4.64 + 4.40 + 0.14 + 2.19 = 11.37

Base: 10.57 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +10.6 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 10.57 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 0.87 points

Why the family-method adjustment is applied

New and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Egypt, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +10.6

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: +10.6 − 0 = +10.6 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Egypt: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded in the cited legal-status review as of 2026-10-09. This is a legal-classification reading only; it does not prove demographic causation.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2026-10-09 (access date) · Reviewed: 2026-10-09

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — family-formation-stability domestic evidence retained

Egypt’s 2024 TFR is 2.735, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal. Housing, inflation, care and work-income pressures still reduce the lived family-environment component.

2026-10-05 World Bank WDI via FRED — Egypt fertility
Fertility is above replacement while cost pressure remains significant

Egypt’s 2024 TFR is 2.735, above the 2.1 replacement floor and therefore a positive fertility signal. Housing, inflation, care and work-income pressures still reduce the lived family-environment component.

2026-10-05 World Bank WDI via FRED — Egypt fertility

Published indicators

Total fertility rate2.74 births per woman

World Bank World Development Indicators via FRED · 2024

Source
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-82.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -35.0

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-82.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-80.1× 25%= -20.0 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -27.8; Money-gated reading -80.1 × 25% = -20.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, large reclamation programmes expand productive land, but access is through regulated allocation, usufruct or ownership arrangements rather than a broad right to take unused land without payment.

For Egypt, large reclamation programmes expand productive land, but access is through regulated allocation, usufruct or ownership arrangements rather than a broad right to take unused land without payment.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-81.8× 35%= -28.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.00/4 with gate-specific source link. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -33.8; Money-gated reading -81.8 × 35% = -28.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, large reclamation programmes expand productive land, but access is through regulated allocation, usufruct or ownership arrangements rather than a broad right to take unused land without payment.

For Egypt, large reclamation programmes expand productive land, but access is through regulated allocation, usufruct or ownership arrangements rather than a broad right to take unused land without payment.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-85.1× 25%= -21.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.8; Money-gated reading -85.1 × 25% = -21.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, large reclamation programmes expand productive land, but access is through regulated allocation, usufruct or ownership arrangements rather than a broad right to take unused land without payment.

For Egypt, large reclamation programmes expand productive land, but access is through regulated allocation, usufruct or ownership arrangements rather than a broad right to take unused land without payment.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-81.2× 15%= -12.2 points
Exact point calculation

-31.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -4.65 weighted points

Original evidence -31.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -31.8; Money-gated reading -81.2 × 15% = -12.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Egypt, large reclamation programmes expand productive land, but access is through regulated allocation, usufruct or ownership arrangements rather than a broad right to take unused land without payment.

For Egypt, large reclamation programmes expand productive land, but access is through regulated allocation, usufruct or ownership arrangements rather than a broad right to take unused land without payment.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.04 + -28.63 + -21.27 + -12.19 = -82.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -34.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -82.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-34.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-35.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -4.65 = -34.20

Base: -35.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -35.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = -1.80 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Egypt, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — land-spatial-freedom domestic evidence retained

For Egypt, large reclamation programmes expand productive land, but access is through regulated allocation, usufruct or ownership arrangements rather than a broad right to take unused land without payment.

2026-10-05 Egypt State Information Service — Mega Projects
Agricultural expansion allocates state land through regulated ownership or usufruct

For Egypt, large reclamation programmes expand productive land, but access is through regulated allocation, usufruct or ownership arrangements rather than a broad right to take unused land without payment.

2026-10-05 Egypt State Information Service — Mega Projects
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-69.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence +10.0

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-69.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-67.8× 25%= -16.9 points
Exact point calculation

18.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points

Original evidence +18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +17.2; Money-gated reading -67.8 × 25% = -16.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Egypt combines comparatively low recorded homicide with large public cultural and historic assets, although crowding, income pressure and paid tourism still shape access to delight.

Egypt combines comparatively low recorded homicide with large public cultural and historic assets, although crowding, income pressure and paid tourism still shape access to delight.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-69.4× 35%= -24.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

12.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 4.20 weighted points

Original evidence +12.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +11.2; Money-gated reading -69.4 × 35% = -24.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Egypt combines comparatively low recorded homicide with large public cultural and historic assets, although crowding, income pressure and paid tourism still shape access to delight.

Egypt combines comparatively low recorded homicide with large public cultural and historic assets, although crowding, income pressure and paid tourism still shape access to delight.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-72.7× 25%= -18.2 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -0.8; Money-gated reading -72.7 × 25% = -18.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Egypt combines comparatively low recorded homicide with large public cultural and historic assets, although crowding, income pressure and paid tourism still shape access to delight.

Egypt combines comparatively low recorded homicide with large public cultural and historic assets, although crowding, income pressure and paid tourism still shape access to delight.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-68.9× 15%= -10.3 points
Exact point calculation

14.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.10 weighted points

Original evidence +14.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +13.2; Money-gated reading -68.9 × 15% = -10.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Egypt combines comparatively low recorded homicide with large public cultural and historic assets, although crowding, income pressure and paid tourism still shape access to delight.

Egypt combines comparatively low recorded homicide with large public cultural and historic assets, although crowding, income pressure and paid tourism still shape access to delight.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.94 + -24.30 + -18.18 + -10.33 = -69.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +10.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: +10.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -69.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+10.8 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score+10.0 Contribution to national evidence score+0.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 4.50 + 4.20 + 0.00 + 2.10 = 10.80

Base: 10.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +10.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 10.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 0.62 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Egypt, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — peace-beauty-delight domestic evidence retained

Egypt combines comparatively low recorded homicide with large public cultural and historic assets, although crowding, income pressure and paid tourism still shape access to delight.

2026-10-05 World Bank Data — Egypt
Low homicide and extensive public heritage support ordinary civic life

Egypt combines comparatively low recorded homicide with large public cultural and historic assets, although crowding, income pressure and paid tourism still shape access to delight.

2026-10-05 World Bank Data — Egypt
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-72.5↓

Money-gated · Evidence 0.0

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-72.5Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-70.5× 25%= -17.6 points
Exact point calculation

8.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 2.00 weighted points

Original evidence +8.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +7.2; Money-gated reading -70.5 × 25% = -17.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, uNDP and World Bank work show active biodiversity and resilience programmes, while extreme water scarcity and heat remain major long-term ecological constraints.

For Egypt, uNDP and World Bank work show active biodiversity and resilience programmes, while extreme water scarcity and heat remain major long-term ecological constraints.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-72.2× 35%= -25.3 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

2.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 0.70 weighted points

Original evidence +2.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +1.2; Money-gated reading -72.2 × 35% = -25.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, uNDP and World Bank work show active biodiversity and resilience programmes, while extreme water scarcity and heat remain major long-term ecological constraints.

For Egypt, uNDP and World Bank work show active biodiversity and resilience programmes, while extreme water scarcity and heat remain major long-term ecological constraints.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-75.5× 25%= -18.9 points
Exact point calculation

-10.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -2.50 weighted points

Original evidence -10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -10.8; Money-gated reading -75.5 × 25% = -18.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, uNDP and World Bank work show active biodiversity and resilience programmes, while extreme water scarcity and heat remain major long-term ecological constraints.

For Egypt, uNDP and World Bank work show active biodiversity and resilience programmes, while extreme water scarcity and heat remain major long-term ecological constraints.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-71.6× 15%= -10.7 points
Exact point calculation

4.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 0.60 weighted points

Original evidence +4.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +3.2; Money-gated reading -71.6 × 15% = -10.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Egypt, uNDP and World Bank work show active biodiversity and resilience programmes, while extreme water scarcity and heat remain major long-term ecological constraints.

For Egypt, uNDP and World Bank work show active biodiversity and resilience programmes, while extreme water scarcity and heat remain major long-term ecological constraints.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -17.63 + -25.26 + -18.87 + -10.74 = -72.5

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +0.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: 0.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -72.5.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+0.8 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score0.0 Contribution to national evidence score0.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 2.00 + 0.70 + -2.50 + 0.60 = 0.80

Base: 0.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published 0.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 0.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 0.00 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Egypt, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes 0.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — living-ground-resilience domestic evidence retained

For Egypt, uNDP and World Bank work show active biodiversity and resilience programmes, while extreme water scarcity and heat remain major long-term ecological constraints.

2026-10-05 UNDP Egypt — biodiversity
Climate adaptation and biodiversity protection are active but water scarcity is structural

For Egypt, uNDP and World Bank work show active biodiversity and resilience programmes, while extreme water scarcity and heat remain major long-term ecological constraints.

2026-10-05 UNDP Egypt — biodiversity
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-78.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence -20.0

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-78.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-76.0× 25%= -19.0 points
Exact point calculation

-12.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -3.00 weighted points

Original evidence -12.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -12.8; Money-gated reading -76.0 × 25% = -19.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, uNDP reported expansion of legal-aid and dispute-settlement offices, but ordinary justice and administration still involve significant institutional and economic friction.

For Egypt, uNDP reported expansion of legal-aid and dispute-settlement offices, but ordinary justice and administration still involve significant institutional and economic friction.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-77.7× 35%= -27.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-18.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -6.30 weighted points

Original evidence -18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -18.8; Money-gated reading -77.7 × 35% = -27.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, uNDP reported expansion of legal-aid and dispute-settlement offices, but ordinary justice and administration still involve significant institutional and economic friction.

For Egypt, uNDP reported expansion of legal-aid and dispute-settlement offices, but ordinary justice and administration still involve significant institutional and economic friction.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-81.0× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.8; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

For Egypt, uNDP reported expansion of legal-aid and dispute-settlement offices, but ordinary justice and administration still involve significant institutional and economic friction.

For Egypt, uNDP reported expansion of legal-aid and dispute-settlement offices, but ordinary justice and administration still involve significant institutional and economic friction.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-77.1× 15%= -11.6 points
Exact point calculation

-16.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -2.40 weighted points

Original evidence -16.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -16.8; Money-gated reading -77.1 × 15% = -11.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Egypt, uNDP reported expansion of legal-aid and dispute-settlement offices, but ordinary justice and administration still involve significant institutional and economic friction.

For Egypt, uNDP reported expansion of legal-aid and dispute-settlement offices, but ordinary justice and administration still involve significant institutional and economic friction.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.01 + -27.18 + -20.24 + -11.57 = -78.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -19.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -20.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -78.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-19.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-20.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -3.00 + -6.30 + -7.50 + -2.40 = -19.20

Base: -20.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -20.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -20.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = -1.03 points

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Egypt, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — justice-safety-friction domestic evidence retained

For Egypt, uNDP reported expansion of legal-aid and dispute-settlement offices, but ordinary justice and administration still involve significant institutional and economic friction.

2026-10-05 UNDP Egypt — 2025 results
Legal-aid expansion reduces some administrative friction

For Egypt, uNDP reported expansion of legal-aid and dispute-settlement offices, but ordinary justice and administration still involve significant institutional and economic friction.

2026-10-05 UNDP Egypt — 2025 results
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-73.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence -5.0

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-73.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-71.9× 25%= -18.0 points
Exact point calculation

3.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.75 weighted points

Original evidence +3.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +2.2; Money-gated reading -71.9 × 25% = -18.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Egypt is investing heavily in infrastructure, yet the reviewed evidence did not establish a broad repair, reuse or material-return system that removes repeated purchase pressure for households.

Egypt is investing heavily in infrastructure, yet the reviewed evidence did not establish a broad repair, reuse or material-return system that removes repeated purchase pressure for households.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-73.5× 35%= -25.7 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-3.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -1.05 weighted points

Original evidence -3.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -3.8; Money-gated reading -73.5 × 35% = -25.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Egypt is investing heavily in infrastructure, yet the reviewed evidence did not establish a broad repair, reuse or material-return system that removes repeated purchase pressure for households.

Egypt is investing heavily in infrastructure, yet the reviewed evidence did not establish a broad repair, reuse or material-return system that removes repeated purchase pressure for households.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-76.8× 25%= -19.2 points
Exact point calculation

-15.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -3.75 weighted points

Original evidence -15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -15.8; Money-gated reading -76.8 × 25% = -19.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score
Shared category evidence

Egypt is investing heavily in infrastructure, yet the reviewed evidence did not establish a broad repair, reuse or material-return system that removes repeated purchase pressure for households.

Egypt is investing heavily in infrastructure, yet the reviewed evidence did not establish a broad repair, reuse or material-return system that removes repeated purchase pressure for households.

This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-73.0× 15%= -11.0 points
Exact point calculation

-1.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -0.15 weighted points

Original evidence -1.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -1.8; Money-gated reading -73.0 × 15% = -11.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Egypt is investing heavily in infrastructure, yet the reviewed evidence did not establish a broad repair, reuse or material-return system that removes repeated purchase pressure for households.

Egypt is investing heavily in infrastructure, yet the reviewed evidence did not establish a broad repair, reuse or material-return system that removes repeated purchase pressure for households.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -17.97 + -25.74 + -19.21 + -10.96 = -73.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -4.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -0.8. Effective evidence: -5.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -73.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-4.2 Published research adjustment-0.8 Original evidence category score-5.0 Contribution to national evidence score-0.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 0.75 + -1.05 + -3.75 + -0.15 = -4.20

Base: -5.00 · reviewed adjustment: -0.80 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -5.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -5.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 97.12 = -0.21 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

Why the reviewed adjustment is applied

Reviewed 2026-10-05. Four-rail diagnostic evidence is separate from the direct Money Gate 20 audit and Family Fertility Method 1.0.0.

Sources behind this reviewed adjustment

For Egypt, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — durability-material-return domestic evidence retained

Egypt is investing heavily in infrastructure, yet the reviewed evidence did not establish a broad repair, reuse or material-return system that removes repeated purchase pressure for households.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Egypt portfolio
Infrastructure expansion is strong but repair-first material circulation is not yet a national default

Egypt is investing heavily in infrastructure, yet the reviewed evidence did not establish a broad repair, reuse or material-return system that removes repeated purchase pressure for households.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Egypt portfolio
6% weight International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
-62.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +36.2

International score breakdown

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

-62.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Entry Accessibility 25%
See all nine International Welcome Entry Accessibility scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-61.0× 25%= -15.2 points
Exact point calculation

42.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points

Original evidence +42.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +42.0; Money-gated reading -61.0 × 25% = -15.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Egypt operates visas and visitor entry routes rather than a uniform unconditional entry policy; ordinary visitors face formal nationality rules.

🤔
Migrant Practical Life 30%
See all nine International Welcome Migrant Practical Life scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-68.7× 30%= -20.6 points
Exact point calculation

14.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 4.20 weighted points

Original evidence +14.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +14.0; Money-gated reading -68.7 × 30% = -20.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

UNHCR's Egypt report says many refugee families face limits on employment, schooling and public services, especially after tighter residency rules.

🤔
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome 25%
See all nine International Welcome Refugee / Neighbour Welcome scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-50.0× 25%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

82.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.50 weighted points

Original evidence +82.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +82.0; Money-gated reading -50.0 × 25% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Egypt, at end-2025 UNHCR registered about 1.10 million refugees/asylum seekers from 62 nationalities, mostly living within urban communities.

🤔
Flexibility / Continuity 20%
See all nine International Welcome Flexibility / Continuity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-71.1× 20%= -14.2 points
Exact point calculation

5.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 1.00 weighted points

Original evidence +5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +5.0; Money-gated reading -71.1 × 20% = -14.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Egypt, uNHCR reported asylum residence-processing delays up to 19 months by end-2025, continued detentions for residency issues and severely strained support.

Egypt hosts people displaced from regional conflicts and WFP provides refugee and vulnerable-household assistance; entry and residence nonetheless remain governed by formal legal and financial conditions.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -15.24 + -20.60 + -12.49 + -14.22 = -62.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +36.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +36.2. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -62.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+36.2 Original evidence category score+36.2 Contribution to national evidence score+1.7
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 10.50 + 4.20 + 20.50 + 1.00 = 36.20

Base: 36.20 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +36.2 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 36.20 × (6.00 × 76.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.70 points

For Egypt, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 76% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.56%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — Flexibility / Continuity (international-access-human-welcome)

For Egypt, uNHCR reported asylum residence-processing delays up to 19 months by end-2025, continued detentions for residency issues and severely strained support.

2026-10-11 UNHCR Egypt 2025 annual results report
2026 full review — Egypt — Refugee / Neighbour Welcome (international-access-human-welcome)

For Egypt, at end-2025 UNHCR registered about 1.10 million refugees/asylum seekers from 62 nationalities, mostly living within urban communities.

2026-10-11 UNHCR Egypt 2025 annual results report
2026 full review — Egypt — Migrant Practical Life (international-access-human-welcome)

UNHCR's Egypt report says many refugee families face limits on employment, schooling and public services, especially after tighter residency rules.

2026-10-11 UNHCR Egypt 2025 annual results published 2026
2026 full review — Egypt — Entry Accessibility (international-access-human-welcome)

Egypt operates visas and visitor entry routes rather than a uniform unconditional entry policy; ordinary visitors face formal nationality rules.

2026-10-11 Egypt eVisa official portal
Egypt carries substantial refugee and regional humanitarian responsibilities

Egypt hosts people displaced from regional conflicts and WFP provides refugee and vulnerable-household assistance; entry and residence nonetheless remain governed by formal legal and financial conditions.

2026-10-05 World Food Programme — Egypt
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-63.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence +34.4

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-63.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Positive Contribution 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-51.1× 25%= -12.8 points
Exact point calculation

78.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 19.50 weighted points

Original evidence +78.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +78.0; Money-gated reading -51.1 × 25% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

The Egyptian Red Crescent coordinated large aid convoys into Gaza, with an official October 2025 dispatch carrying food, fuel and medical relief.

🤔
Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-54.6× 25%= -13.7 points
Exact point calculation

65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points

Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -54.6 × 25% = -13.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

The IFRC independently recognises the Egyptian Red Crescent as a main logistics route to deliver relief into Gaza, alongside serious access limits.

🤔
Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-77.5× 35%= -27.1 points
Exact point calculation

-18.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -6.30 weighted points

Original evidence -18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -18.0; Money-gated reading -77.5 × 35% = -27.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

IFRC notes the severe access restrictions and supply-chain constraints that restrict the share of assistance reaching families; limits cannot be wholly attributed to Egypt.

🤔
Accountability / Repair 15%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-63.4× 15%= -9.5 points
Exact point calculation

33.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 4.95 weighted points

Original evidence +33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +33.0; Money-gated reading -63.4 × 15% = -9.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Egypt, official dispatch records and IFRC statements give some independent corroboration of activity but not a full recipient-level distribution and repair audit.

Egypt contributes regional logistics, energy and humanitarian capacity, but the reviewed evidence does not justify a positive or negative scored external-footprint row.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.76 + -13.66 + -27.11 + -9.51 = -63.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +34.4. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +34.4. Money Gate ceiling: -45.0. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+34.4 Original evidence category score+34.4 Contribution to national evidence score+1.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 19.50 + 16.25 + -6.30 + 4.95 = 34.40

Base: 34.40 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +34.4 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 34.40 × (6.00 × 76.00%) ÷ 97.12 = 1.62 points

Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions

A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.

Exported waste / garbageAudit pending
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingAudit pending

No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.

For Egypt, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 76% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.56%. After normalization across Egypt’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026 full review — Egypt — Accountability / Repair (external-footprint-non-extractive)

For Egypt, official dispatch records and IFRC statements give some independent corroboration of activity but not a full recipient-level distribution and repair audit.

2026-10-11 IFRC Egypt aid review
2026 full review — Egypt — Documented Harm / Extraction (external-footprint-non-extractive)

IFRC notes the severe access restrictions and supply-chain constraints that restrict the share of assistance reaching families; limits cannot be wholly attributed to Egypt.

2026-10-11 IFRC October 2025 humanitarian statement
2026 full review — Egypt — Mutuality / Local Benefit (external-footprint-non-extractive)

The IFRC independently recognises the Egyptian Red Crescent as a main logistics route to deliver relief into Gaza, alongside serious access limits.

2026-10-11 IFRC humanitarian support statement October 2025
2026 full review — Egypt — Positive Contribution (external-footprint-non-extractive)

The Egyptian Red Crescent coordinated large aid convoys into Gaza, with an official October 2025 dispatch carrying food, fuel and medical relief.

2026-10-11 Egypt State Information Service aid convoy report
Regional infrastructure and humanitarian roles are mixed with conventional trade and extraction dynamics

Egypt contributes regional logistics, energy and humanitarian capacity, but the reviewed evidence does not justify a positive or negative scored external-footprint row.

2026-10-05 World Bank Group — Egypt

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.