Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile
Kiribati 🇰🇮
Kiribati currently ranks #154 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -66.91. This country is under the national Money Gate, strongest in Energy and weakest in Transport among 14 scored of 16 evidence categories.
Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.
Country profile & diagnostic reading
Tracking baselineEvidence through 31 Dec 2025How the headline score is calculated
Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.
Current evidence: +19.1 · Money Gate: 2.22/20 · Headline: -66.9.
The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.
TBF Rank TBF Rank Rank compares only published profiles. It follows the TBF Abundance Score, not GDP or money size, and can move when a country score changes or when another country enters the published table. Read Small Island Abundance Theory Challenge a score or supply new evidenceHeads of state, authorized representatives and evidence holders may submit documentation and request recalculation. A review never silently overwrites the previous rank or scoring record.Appeal Kiribati's score or request recalculation →
Global standing based on life reachability
243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries
KiribatiLast recorded move: down from #153 to #154.Recent recorded movements
- #153 → #15421 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500
- #152 → #15321 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500
- #142 → #15220 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
- #142 → #14520 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
Rank journey · newest first
Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.
Research Coverage Research coverage Coverage reports the weighted share of categories with documented scoring and supporting source records. 100% means all category scoring slots have been assessed; it does not guarantee that every claim has been independently measured or that every family has no-payment access. Read the source and evidence limitations for each point. Explore Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
Coverage calculation
Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:
9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% = 88.00% weighted coverage
Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.
Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.
14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 0 / 2 international categories scored
GDP and money rank GDP and money rank GDP and money rank are context only. They track monetized production, not how freely people access life, and contribute zero points to TBF Abundance. Read Make the World Truly Productive Again
GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking
Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0
Five basics stand between this country and zero The zero-line rule All five basics must reach 4/4 before a country can cross zero. Open any gate reading to see exactly why its points were assigned and review the source record. Reach-to-Money-Gate Clearance 2.0 These five gates measure effective no-payment access, not installed capacity alone. Under new source-backed reviews, 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 points track verified free access to 0%, some but less than 30%, 30%+, 50%+, 75%+ and 100% of the population respectively. The higher levels require reliable real use; 4/4 requires universally accessible, reliable service without ordinary charges or exclusions. Missing population figures remain pending. Older gate points remain archived until re-audited.
Food Food · 4 points Full credit means nutritious food is ordinary civilization provision without a checkout or poverty test. School meals and other narrow institutional routes can earn limited partial credit without being mistaken for free food abundance. Read A Civilization Laid Out in Orchards
Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned
Housing / Land Housing / Land · 4 points Full credit means families can secure a home or suitable productive ground without rent, purchase price or mortgage debt deciding whether they may remain sheltered and grounded. Read the Distributed Founding Nuclei Strategy
Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned
Healthcare Healthcare · 4 points Full credit requires dependable no-payment care across prevention, primary care, maternity, dentistry, medicine, emergency treatment and necessary specialist care. Read Money Zombie Outbreaks
Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned
Transportation Transportation · 4 points Full credit means ordinary movement is free across the routes people actually need. A free Sunday, one route or a temporary promotion earns only limited credit. Read The Caterport: Free Human Movement
Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned
Water / Energy Water / Energy · 4 points Full credit requires both safe water and essential household energy to stay available without payment deciding whether cooking, cooling, washing, pumping or food preservation stops. Read Nucleus Formation Stewards
Direct gate evidence pending · no individual gate points assigned
- FoodPending
- Housing / LandPending
- HealthcarePending
- TransportationPending
- Water / EnergyPending
- Money still neededNot measured
The existing transitional gate estimate is not split into invented category scores. Five direct category audits are still needed.
Why this reading is pending
The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.
Actual calculation
Five separate Money Gate components inform this reading.
A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.
Why 77.7 / 100?
Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.
Actual calculation
(100 - -55.34) ÷ 2 = 77.67 / 100
The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.
Why -44.5?
Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.
Actual calculation
-50 + 2.5 × 2.22 = -44.5
The transitional value is derived from published domestic Reach and Friction rails only to preserve historical ordering. It is not a substitute for the five direct 0–4 gate findings above and can never clear the Money Gate.
16-category profile
All categories at a glance
All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.
Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.
Category readings & evidence
Open any category for the full diagnostic reading
9% weight
Human Time & Burden Return
What this category measures
Whether productivity, infrastructure and institutions return usable lifetime to people and families.
TBFC targetNecessary contribution should not require people to sell most of their waking life merely to retain access to food, shelter, care and ordinary family life. Access-gate research questionHow much paid work or income-producing activity is required before an ordinary household can keep access to basic life, and what usable family time remains afterward? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Family Shubaka: protecting human and family time
-69.9↓Money-gated · Evidence +8.3
Money-gated · Evidence +8.3
Score breakdown
Human Time & Burden Return
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points
Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -59.7 × 25% = -14.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kiribati, labour force participation rate: 52.40 percent
For Kiribati, unemployment rate: 3.10 percent
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
20.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 7.00 weighted points
Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -66.7 × 35% = -23.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kiribati, labour force participation rate: 52.40 percent
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.5 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, unemployment rate: 3.10 percent
For Kiribati, composite labour underutilization: 42.60 percent
For Kiribati, informal employment: 59.90 percent
For Kiribati, youth not in employment, education or training: 37.70 percent
Exact point calculation
25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points
Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -65.3 × 15% = -9.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, labour force participation rate: 52.40 percent
For Kiribati, unemployment rate: 3.10 percent
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +8.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +8.3. Money Gate ceiling: -44.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -69.9.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 11.25 + 7.00 + -13.75 + 3.75 = 8.25
Base: 8.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +8.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 8.25 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 0.84 points
For Kiribati, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Kiribati’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +25.0
Published indicators
Kiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
Source
8% weight
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
What this category measures
Whether adequate shelter physically exists and actually reaches people without excessive cost, exclusion or vacancy mismatch.
TBFC targetAdequate family shelter should remain reachable without lifetime dependence on rent, mortgage debt or ability to pay. Access-gate research questionWhat share of ordinary shelter access depends on rent, mortgage debt, purchase price or other recurring payment, and what dependable non-market routes exist at national scale? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Mother-Sight compound home
-66.7↓Money-gated · Evidence +19.8
Money-gated · Evidence +19.8
Score breakdown
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 12.50 weighted points
Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 25% = -14.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kiribati, households owning dwelling free and clear: 83.60 percent
For Kiribati, south Tarawa population density: 3,942.00 people per sq km
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points
Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -59.7 × 35% = -20.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kiribati, households owning dwelling free and clear: 83.60 percent
Exact point calculation
-40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.00 weighted points
Original evidence -40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -40.0; Money-gated reading -83.3 × 25% = -20.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, south Tarawa population density: 3,942.00 people per sq km
For Kiribati, households affected by natural disaster in prior 12 months: 25.00 percent
For Kiribati, affected households reporting home damage: 60.00 percent
Exact point calculation
10.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 1.50 weighted points
Original evidence +10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +10.0; Money-gated reading -69.4 × 15% = -10.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, households owning dwelling free and clear: 83.60 percent
For Kiribati, south Tarawa population density: 3,942.00 people per sq km
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +19.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +19.8. Money Gate ceiling: -44.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -66.7.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 12.50 + 15.75 + -10.00 + 1.50 = 19.75
Base: 19.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 19.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.80 points
For Kiribati, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Kiribati’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +5.0
Published indicators
Kiribati National Statistics Office · 2020
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2020
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
Source
9% weight
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
What this category measures
Physical food and nutrient capacity, nourishment reach, waste/loss, public edible landscapes and free food access.
TBFC targetNutritious food should exist in multiplying abundance and remain reachable even when a household has no money to spend. Access-gate research questionCan people obtain adequate nutritious food when they cannot pay, and are free/public/productive-food routes large enough to be ordinary rather than exceptional? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Complete Reordering of Earth’s Food System
-66.3↓Money-gated · Evidence +21.5
Money-gated · Evidence +21.5
Score breakdown
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
Exact point calculation
65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.25 weighted points
Original evidence +65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +65.0; Money-gated reading -54.2 × 25% = -13.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kiribati, households participating in agriculture/fishing/copra or related primary activity: Almost all households participate in some agricultural or primary food-producing activity.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Food not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points
Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -62.5 × 35% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kiribati, moderate or severe food insecurity: 44.00 percent
For Kiribati, households reporting severe food insecurity: 5.00 percent
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.5 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, moderate or severe food insecurity: 44.00 percent
For Kiribati, households reporting severe food insecurity: 5.00 percent
For Kiribati, household spending going to food: 50.00 percent
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.75 weighted points
Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -59.7 × 15% = -9.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, at-home food consumption value that is home-grown or reared: 20.00 percent
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +21.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +21.5. Money Gate ceiling: -44.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -66.3.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 16.25 + 12.25 + -13.75 + 6.75 = 21.50
Base: 21.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +21.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 21.50 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.20 points
For Kiribati, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Kiribati’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +30.0
Published indicators
Kiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
Source
6% weight
Water & Sanitation Abundance
What this category measures
Safe water, sanitation, reliability, capture, reuse, storage and living-landscape water capacity.
TBFC targetSafe water and sanitation should be dependable life infrastructure, not conditional on household purchasing power. Access-gate research questionCan households retain safe water and sanitation when income falls, and which payment, disconnection or infrastructure barriers interrupt access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
-70.4↓Money-gated · Evidence +6.8
Money-gated · Evidence +6.8
Score breakdown
Water & Sanitation Abundance
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points
Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -62.5 × 25% = -15.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kiribati, population using improved drinking water: 88.00 percent
For Kiribati, population using safely managed sanitation: 45.00 percent
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
30.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points
Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -63.9 × 35% = -22.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kiribati, population using improved drinking water: 88.00 percent
For Kiribati, population using safely managed sanitation: 45.00 percent
For Kiribati, population using basic drinking-water services: 75.00 percent
For Kiribati, population using basic sanitation services: 44.00 percent
Exact point calculation
-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points
Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -90.3 × 25% = -22.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, population using improved drinking water: 88.00 percent
For Kiribati, population using safely managed sanitation: 45.00 percent
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points
Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -65.3 × 15% = -9.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, population using improved drinking water: 88.00 percent
For Kiribati, population using safely managed sanitation: 45.00 percent
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +6.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +6.8. Money Gate ceiling: -44.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -70.4.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 8.75 + 10.50 + -16.25 + 3.75 = 6.75
Base: 6.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +6.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 6.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 0.46 points
For Kiribati, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Kiribati’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +5.0
Published indicators
Kiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
SourceUNICEF Pacific · 2023
SourceUNICEF Pacific · 2023
Source
5% weight
Energy & Household Capability
What this category measures
Whether usable, reliable energy reaches households and removes burdens across water, food, health, cooling, cooking and movement.
TBFC targetEssential household energy should support cooking, cooling, water, food preservation and care without money becoming the switch that turns basic capability on or off. Access-gate research questionCan households retain essential energy for cooking, cooling, water and food preservation when they cannot pay, and how often does price or disconnection reduce capability? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Solar Moon Panel
-61.0↓Money-gated · Evidence +40.5
Money-gated · Evidence +40.5
Score breakdown
Energy & Household Capability
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -51.4 × 25% = -12.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kiribati, planned South Tarawa solar generation capacity: 7.50 MW
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 24.50 weighted points
Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -52.8 × 35% = -18.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kiribati, access to electricity: 97.70 percent
For Kiribati, population/households with electricity in HIES SDG reporting: 91.00 percent
Exact point calculation
-35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.75 weighted points
Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -81.9 × 25% = -20.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, access to electricity: 97.70 percent
For Kiribati, population/households with electricity in HIES SDG reporting: 91.00 percent
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points
Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -61.1 × 15% = -9.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, renewables excluding hydropower share of electricity: 16.40 percent
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +40.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +40.5. Money Gate ceiling: -44.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -61.0.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 24.50 + -8.75 + 6.00 = 40.50
Base: 40.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +40.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 40.50 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.30 points
For Kiribati, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Kiribati’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +5.0
Published indicators
World Bank · 2024
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
SourceWorld Bank / Our World in Data · 2021
SourceAsian Development Bank · 2023
Source
7% weight
Health & Care Reach
What this category measures
Whether prevention, primary care, medicine, maternity care, dentistry and specialist capability reach people when needed.
TBFC targetPrevention, maternity, dentistry, medicine and necessary treatment should be reachable because care is needed, not because payment can be produced. Access-gate research questionCan necessary care be obtained because it is needed, or do price, insurance, employment, debt or other financial tests materially delay or prevent access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: No Shrugging Our Shoulders at Family Suffering
-66.8↓Money-gated · Evidence +19.5
Money-gated · Evidence +19.5
Score breakdown
Health & Care Reach
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 11.25 weighted points
Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -59.7 × 25% = -14.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kiribati, under-five mortality rate: 53.10 deaths per 1,000 live births
For Kiribati, infant mortality rate: 39.00 deaths per 1,000 live births
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.75 weighted points
Original evidence +45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +45.0; Money-gated reading -59.7 × 35% = -20.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kiribati, care-seeking for acute respiratory infection: 87.00 percent
For Kiribati, children with diarrhoea receiving ORS: 61.00 percent
Exact point calculation
-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points
Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -84.7 × 25% = -21.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, under-five mortality rate: 53.10 deaths per 1,000 live births
For Kiribati, infant mortality rate: 39.00 deaths per 1,000 live births
For Kiribati, population/households with catastrophic health spending above 10%: 0.00 percent
Exact point calculation
25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points
Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -65.3 × 15% = -9.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, under-five mortality rate: 53.10 deaths per 1,000 live births
For Kiribati, infant mortality rate: 39.00 deaths per 1,000 live births
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +19.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +19.5. Money Gate ceiling: -44.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -66.8.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 11.25 + 15.75 + -11.25 + 3.75 = 19.50
Base: 19.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 19.50 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.55 points
For Kiribati, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Kiribati’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: 0.0
Published indicators
UNICEF · 2024
SourceUNICEF · 2024
SourceUNICEF · 2019
SourceUNICEF · 2019
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
Source
6% weight
Education & Human Capability
What this category measures
Foundational learning plus practical, technical and enduring civilization capability retained by people.
TBFC targetFoundational learning and useful capability should be reachable as part of civilization life rather than purchased according to family income. Access-gate research questionWhich essential learning and capability routes are genuinely reachable regardless of family income, and where do fees, debt or paid enrichment create decisive access gaps? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: What Is NoDumbDumbs?
-65.2↓Money-gated · Evidence +25.3
Money-gated · Evidence +25.3
Score breakdown
Education & Human Capability
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -56.9 × 25% = -14.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kiribati, children age 6–13 in formal/non-formal education: 98.00 percent
For Kiribati, children age 36–59 months attending early childhood education: 72.00 percent
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.00 weighted points
Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -55.6 × 35% = -19.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kiribati, children age 6–13 in formal/non-formal education: 98.00 percent
For Kiribati, children age 36–59 months attending early childhood education: 72.00 percent
For Kiribati, primary completion rate: 93.00 percent
Exact point calculation
-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points
Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.0; Money-gated reading -86.1 × 25% = -21.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, upper secondary attendance or higher: 54.70 percent
For Kiribati, learning poverty estimate range: 49.00 percent
Exact point calculation
20.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.00 weighted points
Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -66.7 × 15% = -10.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, children age 6–13 in formal/non-formal education: 98.00 percent
For Kiribati, children age 36–59 months attending early childhood education: 72.00 percent
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +25.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +25.3. Money Gate ceiling: -44.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -65.2.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 13.75 + 21.00 + -12.50 + 3.00 = 25.25
Base: 25.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +25.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 25.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.72 points
For Kiribati, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Kiribati’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: -5.0
Published indicators
Kiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
SourceUNICEF · 2019
SourceUNICEF / UNESCO · 2020
SourceUNICEF Pacific · 2022
SourceWorld Bank · 2022
Source
4% weight
Mobility & Reachability
What this category measures
Local, regional and national movement that connects people to family, services, work, learning and public life without consuming excessive time.
TBFC targetOrdinary local and regional movement should be available for family, care, learning and civic life without travel becoming a paywall. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary people reach family, care, learning and public life without high recurring fares, vehicle costs, debt or fuel dependence? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Caterport: Free Human Movement
-72.6↓Money-gated · Evidence -1.3
Money-gated · Evidence -1.3
Score breakdown
Mobility & Reachability
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points
Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -62.5 × 25% = -15.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kiribati, paved road length: 43.00 km
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
- -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
- -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
- -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
- -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
- 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
- +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
- +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
- +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
- +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation
15.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points
Original evidence +15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +15.0; Money-gated reading -68.1 × 35% = -23.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kiribati, a 2025 World Bank grant supports road and airport upgrades on Kiritimati, an important response to geographic isolation.
For Kiribati, aDB investment targets safer and more resilient access for outer-island communities including Abaiang, Nonouti, Beru and Tabiteuea South.
Exact point calculation
-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points
Original evidence -70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -91.7 × 25% = -22.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, reported road-traffic fatalities: 8.00 count
For Kiribati, wHO estimated road-traffic death rate: 6.20 per 100,000
For Kiribati, national island dispersion: 33 coral islands spread across about 3.5 million km²
Exact point calculation
15.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 2.25 weighted points
Original evidence +15.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +15.0; Money-gated reading -68.1 × 15% = -10.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, a 2025 World Bank grant supports road and airport upgrades on Kiritimati, an important response to geographic isolation.
For Kiribati, aDB investment targets safer and more resilient access for outer-island communities including Abaiang, Nonouti, Beru and Tabiteuea South.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: -1.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -1.3. Money Gate ceiling: -44.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -72.6.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 8.75 + 5.25 + -17.50 + 2.25 = -1.25
Base: -1.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -1.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: -1.25 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = -0.06 points
For Kiribati, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Kiribati’s researched categories, this category contributes -0.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
For Kiribati, a 2025 World Bank grant supports road and airport upgrades on Kiritimati, an important response to geographic isolation.
2025-05-19 World BankFor Kiribati, aDB investment targets safer and more resilient access for outer-island communities including Abaiang, Nonouti, Beru and Tabiteuea South.
Asian Development BankPublished indicators
World Health Organization · 2021
SourceWorld Health Organization · 2021
SourceWorld Health Organization · 2010
SourceUNICEF Pacific · 2024
Source
8% weight
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
What this category measures
Conditions that let people form stable families, raise children, multiply generations, share parental time and continue family life without punishing material barriers. New and re-reviewed profiles include total fertility as an explicit outcome signal.
TBFC targetPeople should be able to form, continue and multiply family life. Trott Bailey Family Civilization uses 5.0 children per woman as the fertility target; 2.1 is the replacement floor, not the aspiration, while housing, care, food and time should not be withheld behind financial thresholds. Access-gate research questionHow strongly do housing, childcare, health, food and work-income requirements delay or destabilize family formation and continuity, and is total fertility moving above replacement toward the 5.0-children-per-woman civilization target? Fertility methodNew and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Courtship, Marriage & Married Life
-70.7↓Money-gated · Evidence +5.5
Money-gated · Evidence +5.5
Score breakdown
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 10.00 weighted points
Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -61.1 × 25% = -15.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kiribati, birth registration coverage: 92.00 percent
For Kiribati, women age 20–24 married before age 18: 18.00 percent
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.25 weighted points
Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -62.5 × 35% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kiribati, birth registration coverage: 92.00 percent
Exact point calculation
-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points
Original evidence -70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -91.7 × 25% = -22.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, women age 20–24 married before age 18: 18.00 percent
For Kiribati, children 1–14 experiencing physical punishment and/or psychological aggression: 92.00 percent
For Kiribati, women 15–49 saying wife beating is justified for at least one reason: 70.00 percent
Exact point calculation
5.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 0.75 weighted points
Original evidence +5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +5.0; Money-gated reading -70.8 × 15% = -10.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, birth registration coverage: 92.00 percent
For Kiribati, women age 20–24 married before age 18: 18.00 percent
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +5.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +5.5. Money Gate ceiling: -44.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -70.7.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 10.00 + 12.25 + -17.50 + 0.75 = 5.50
Base: 5.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +5.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 5.50 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 0.50 points
For Kiribati, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Kiribati’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion
First half — the established family and fertility assessment
The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.
Pre-policy score: +5.5
Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion
This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.
Country legal status: Pending verification
Deduction calculation: Pending; 0 points deducted provisionally, not a verified zero
Final category calculation: +5.5 − 0 = +5.5 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)
Legal status not independently reviewed for this jurisdiction; no deduction is assigned. Pending is not a confirmed absence of recognition.
Fertility and family policy: research and source notes
Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.
How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.
How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.
Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).
Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.
Abundance Gap: +5.0
Published indicators
UNICEF · 2019
SourceUNICEF · 2019
SourceUNICEF · 2019
SourceUNICEF · 2019
Source
5% weight
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
What this category measures
Whether land and settlement choice reach ordinary people rather than opportunity being functionally trapped inside expensive commercial centres.
TBFC targetSuitable productive land and settlement opportunity should not be functionally reserved for those able to outbid everyone else. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary families gain secure use of suitable productive ground without first accumulating enough money to purchase, finance or outbid others? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Compounds Are Civilization Circulation Systems
-65.6↓Money-gated · Evidence +24.0
Money-gated · Evidence +24.0
Score breakdown
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points
Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -55.6 × 25% = -13.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kiribati, kiritimati land area: 388.00 sq km
For Kiribati, inhabited/national island geography: 33.00 count islands
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land not recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kiribati, population living on Kiritimati: 6.00 percent
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.5 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, population living in South Tarawa: 53.00 percent
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points
Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -62.5 × 15% = -9.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, kiritimati land area: 388.00 sq km
For Kiribati, population living in South Tarawa: 53.00 percent
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +24.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +24.0. Money Gate ceiling: -44.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -65.6.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 15.00 + 17.50 + -13.75 + 5.25 = 24.00
Base: 24.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +24.0 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 24.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.36 points
For Kiribati, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Kiribati’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +10.0
Published indicators
World Bank · 2024
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / World Bank · 2020
SourceWorld Bank · 2020
SourceUNICEF Pacific · 2024
Source
6% weight
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
What this category measures
Peace of mind, social support, everyday safety, public beauty, recreation, nature, culture and delight reachable without constant payment.
TBFC targetBeauty, nature, recreation, rest and public delight should belong to ordinary life rather than appearing mainly after payment. Access-gate research questionHow much everyday rest, nature, recreation, culture and public beauty is freely reachable, rather than principally accessed through paid venues, travel or private property? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
-62.6↓Money-gated · Evidence +34.5
Money-gated · Evidence +34.5
Score breakdown
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
Exact point calculation
80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points
Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -50.0 × 25% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kiribati, phoenix Islands Protected Area: 408,250.00 sq km
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -56.9 × 35% = -19.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kiribati, suicide rate age 15–29: 31.10 per 100,000
For Kiribati, households affected by natural disasters in prior year: 25.00 percent
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.5 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, suicide rate age 15–29: 31.10 per 100,000
For Kiribati, households affected by natural disasters in prior year: 25.00 percent
For Kiribati, people temporarily relocated by natural disasters: 4,000.00 people
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.00 weighted points
Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -55.6 × 15% = -8.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, suicide rate age 15–29: 31.10 per 100,000
For Kiribati, households affected by natural disasters in prior year: 25.00 percent
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +34.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +34.5. Money Gate ceiling: -44.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -62.6.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 20.00 + 19.25 + -13.75 + 9.00 = 34.50
Base: 34.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +34.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 34.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 2.35 points
For Kiribati, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Kiribati’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +25.0
Published indicators
World Health Organization · 2021
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
SourceUNESCO World Heritage Centre · 2026
Source
6% weight
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
What this category measures
Whether soil, forests, wetlands, habitat, pollinators, species and water-holding landscapes are strengthening rather than being consumed.
TBFC targetRegenerating soil, water, habitat and food-bearing landscapes should be maintained as shared life-supporting capacity rather than only where a transaction makes them profitable. Access-gate research questionAre regenerative land, water and habitat functions maintained as life-supporting infrastructure even when no direct commercial return is available? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
-64.2↓Money-gated · Evidence +28.8
Money-gated · Evidence +28.8
Score breakdown
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
Exact point calculation
75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points
Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -51.4 × 25% = -12.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kiribati, forest area: 1.50 percent land area
For Kiribati, known fauna species in PIPA: 800.00 species
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -56.9 × 35% = -19.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kiribati, marine area protected: 11.90 percent
For Kiribati, terrestrial area protected: 22.90 percent
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
-70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -17.50 weighted points
Original evidence -70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -70.0; Money-gated reading -91.7 × 25% = -22.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, disaster-affected households reporting agricultural losses: 26.00 percent
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -56.9 × 15% = -8.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, marine area protected: 11.90 percent
For Kiribati, terrestrial area protected: 22.90 percent
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +28.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +28.8. Money Gate ceiling: -44.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.2.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 18.75 + 19.25 + -17.50 + 8.25 = 28.75
Base: 28.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +28.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 28.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.96 points
For Kiribati, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Kiribati’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
Published indicators
SPREP PIPAP / UNEP-WCMC · 2025
SourceSPREP PIPAP / UNEP-WCMC · 2025
SourceWorld Bank · 2023
SourceUNESCO World Heritage Centre · 2026
SourceKiribati National Statistics Office / Pacific Community · 2024
Source
5% weight
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
What this category measures
Physical safety, usable justice, legal identity, reliable public administration and low needless institutional burden.
TBFC targetUsable justice, legal identity, safety and ordinary administration should remain accessible regardless of wealth. Access-gate research questionDo fees, legal costs, bail, fines, documentation costs or ability to hire expertise materially change access to justice, safety or public administration? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Pacorips Constitutional Foundations
-66.1↓Money-gated · Evidence +22.0
Money-gated · Evidence +22.0
Score breakdown
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.75 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -56.9 × 25% = -14.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kiribati, freedom in the World score: 89.00 score /100
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For Kiribati, mCC rule-of-law percentile: 91.00 percentile
For Kiribati, mCC control-of-corruption percentile: 84.00 percentile
Exact point calculation
-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points
Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.5 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Freedom House notes recent pressure on judicial independence despite Kiribati remaining a multiparty democracy with generally upheld civil liberties.
Exact point calculation
30.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points
Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -63.9 × 15% = -9.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Freedom House notes recent pressure on judicial independence despite Kiribati remaining a multiparty democracy with generally upheld civil liberties.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +22.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +22.0. Money Gate ceiling: -44.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -66.1.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 13.75 + 17.50 + -13.75 + 4.50 = 22.00
Base: 22.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +22.0 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 22.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 1.25 points
For Kiribati, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Kiribati’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +5.0
What the evidence found
Freedom House notes recent pressure on judicial independence despite Kiribati remaining a multiparty democracy with generally upheld civil liberties.
2026-01-01 Freedom HousePublished indicators
Freedom House · 2026
SourceMillennium Challenge Corporation · 2024
SourceMillennium Challenge Corporation · 2024
SourceWorld Prison Brief · 2016
Source
4% weight
Durability, Repair & Material Return
What this category measures
Whether useful materials, infrastructure and goods are maintained, repaired, recovered and cycled instead of becoming waste; documented harmful acceptance of imported garbage or disguised low-utility dumping is deducted.
TBFC targetRepair, maintenance and useful material circulation should protect capability instead of forcing repeated repurchase as the default route to continued use. Access-gate research questionDo repair and maintenance remain practically accessible, or do pricing, proprietary restrictions and replacement incentives turn continued use into repeated purchasing? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Repair Is Sovereignty
-66.7↓Money-gated · Evidence +19.8
Money-gated · Evidence +19.8
Score breakdown
Durability, Repair & Material Return
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 12.50 weighted points
Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -58.3 × 25% = -14.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For Kiribati, national waste audit publication: 2,025.00 year
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 14.00 weighted points
Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -61.1 × 35% = -21.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
SPREP published a 2025 Kiribati National Waste Audit Analysis Report to support policy, infrastructure and coordination.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
-60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -15.00 weighted points
Original evidence -60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -60.0; Money-gated reading -88.9 × 25% = -22.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For Kiribati, plastic share of waste stream: 13.00 percent
For Kiribati, plastic waste accumulating: 9.70 tonnes/day
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.25 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -56.9 × 15% = -8.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
SPREP published a 2025 Kiribati National Waste Audit Analysis Report to support policy, infrastructure and coordination.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +19.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +19.8. Money Gate ceiling: -44.5. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -66.7.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 12.50 + 14.00 + -15.00 + 8.25 = 19.75
Base: 19.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 19.75 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 88.00 = 0.90 points
Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions
A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.
No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.
For Kiribati, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Kiribati’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +10.0
What the evidence found
SPREP published a 2025 Kiribati National Waste Audit Analysis Report to support policy, infrastructure and coordination.
2025-06-01 SPREPPublished indicators
Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme · 2019
SourceSecretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme · 2019
SourceSecretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme · 2024
SourceSecretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme · 2018
SourceSecretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme · 2025
Source
6% weight · research presentInternational Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending
The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.
Country findings and sources
For Kiribati, the 2023 exemption order allows eligible nationals up to 90 days, while general entry rules require onward travel and proof of sufficient funds.
Kiribati Immigration Division
6% weight · research presentExternal Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
Open to review verified country findings and original sources
Pending
The country evidence is available, but no reviewed four-rail category score has been assigned. Pending does not mean zero.
Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions
A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.
No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.
Country findings and sources
The Global Carbon Budget consumption-based dataset explicitly reports no data for Kiribati, so imported emissions cannot be inferred from territorial emissions.
Global Carbon Budget / Our World in DataFor Kiribati, uNESCO records PIPA as a 408,250 km² largely intact oceanic coral archipelago ecosystem with globally significant biodiversity.
UNESCO World Heritage CentreTrott Bailey Family Civilization Target
The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping
Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.
This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.
and then 
