Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Mali 🇲🇱

Mali currently ranks #223 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -80.95. This country is money-gated (1.75/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Welcome and weakest in Delight across 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Tracking baselineEvidence through 13 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-81.0
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: -29.9 · Money Gate: 1.75/20 · Headline: -81.0.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#223of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

MaliLast recorded move: down from #222 to #223.Recent recorded movements
  1. #222 → #22321 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500
  2. #221 → #22221 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500
  3. #209 → #22120 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #209 → #21320 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500

Rank journey · newest first

Recorded period 1 of 76: rank 213. 6 Oct 2026 · 18:46 GMT-0500Recorded period 2 of 76: rank 220. 6 Oct 2026 · 19:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 3 of 76: rank 220. 9 Oct 2026 · 06:43 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500Recorded period 4 of 76: rank 220. 11 Oct 2026 · 12:02 GMT-0500 – 11 Oct 2026 · 12:03 GMT-0500Recorded period 5 of 76: rank 219. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 6 of 76: rank 218. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 7 of 76: rank 219. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 8 of 76: rank 218. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 9 of 76: rank 217. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 10 of 76: rank 218. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 11 of 76: rank 217. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 12 of 76: rank 215. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 13 of 76: rank 213. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 14 of 76: rank 212. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 15 of 76: rank 211. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 16 of 76: rank 210. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500Recorded period 17 of 76: rank 218. 12 Oct 2026 · 05:13 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 18 of 76: rank 219. 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500 – 12 Oct 2026 · 06:17 GMT-0500Recorded period 19 of 76: rank 220. 13 Oct 2026 · 18:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 20 of 76: rank 219. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 21 of 76: rank 218. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 22 of 76: rank 217. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 23 of 76: rank 216. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 24 of 76: rank 215. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 25 of 76: rank 214. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 26 of 76: rank 213. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 27 of 76: rank 212. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 28 of 76: rank 211. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 29 of 76: rank 210. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 30 of 76: rank 209. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 31 of 76: rank 208. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500 – 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 32 of 76: rank 207. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 33 of 76: rank 206. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 34 of 76: rank 205. 18 Oct 2026 · 19:30 GMT-0500Recorded period 35 of 76: rank 204. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 36 of 76: rank 203. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 37 of 76: rank 202. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 38 of 76: rank 201. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 39 of 76: rank 200. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 40 of 76: rank 199. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 41 of 76: rank 198. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 42 of 76: rank 197. 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500 – 19 Oct 2026 · 11:19 GMT-0500Recorded period 43 of 76: rank 196. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:32 GMT-0500Recorded period 44 of 76: rank 195. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 45 of 76: rank 194. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 46 of 76: rank 193. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 47 of 76: rank 192. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 48 of 76: rank 191. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 49 of 76: rank 190. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 50 of 76: rank 189. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 51 of 76: rank 188. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 52 of 76: rank 187. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 53 of 76: rank 186. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 54 of 76: rank 185. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 55 of 76: rank 184. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 56 of 76: rank 183. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 57 of 76: rank 182. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 58 of 76: rank 181. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 59 of 76: rank 180. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 60 of 76: rank 179. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 61 of 76: rank 178. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 62 of 76: rank 177. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 63 of 76: rank 176. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 64 of 76: rank 175. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500 – 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 65 of 76: rank 174. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 66 of 76: rank 173. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 67 of 76: rank 172. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 68 of 76: rank 170. 20 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500Recorded period 69 of 76: rank 169. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 70 of 76: rank 167. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 71 of 76: rank 165. 20 Oct 2026 · 10:42 GMT-0500Recorded period 72 of 76: rank 189. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 73 of 76: rank 209. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 74 of 76: rank 213. 20 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500Recorded period 75 of 76: rank 222. 21 Oct 2026 · 05:21 GMT-0500Recorded period 76 of 76: rank 223. 21 Oct 2026 · 07:24 GMT-0500NOW #223Oct 2026Oct 2026

Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.

View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

100%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% = 100.00% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#114

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

0.5 / 4

Food

Why 0.5 / 4?

Evidence supports only partial food credit (0.5/4): ordinary nutritious food remains substantially money-gated; targeted/public supports do not equal national zero-payment food access.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
0.3 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 0.3 / 4?

Evidence supports only partial housing/land credit (0.25/4): ordinary shelter or productive land is not universally reachable without payment, ownership, eligibility or tenure friction.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
0.5 / 4

Healthcare

Why 0.5 / 4?

Evidence supports 0.5/4 for healthcare: public capacity and subsidies are credited, but ordinary access is not universal full zero-payment care across treatment, medicines and practical reach.

Point calculation

0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
0.3 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.3 / 4?

Evidence supports 0.25/4 for transportation: public/road capacity is credited, but routine mobility is not universally zero-fare and frictionless.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
0.3 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 0.3 / 4?

Evidence supports 0.25/4 for water/energy: capacity and subsidies are credited, but household utilities remain payment-, reliability- or geography-gated.

Point calculation

0.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 6.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
Money Gate score
  • Food0.5 / 4
  • Housing / Land0.3 / 4
  • Healthcare0.5 / 4
  • Transportation0.3 / 4
  • Water / Energy0.3 / 4
  • Money still needed18.3 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 1.8 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 0.50 + Housing / Land 0.25 + Healthcare 0.50 + Transportation 0.25 + Water / Energy 0.25 = 1.75 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
74.4 / 100
Why 74.4 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -48.75) ÷ 2 = 74.38 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-45.6
Why -45.6?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 1.75 = -45.6

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-83.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence -40.0

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-83.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.5× 25%= -20.4 points
Exact point calculation

-32.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.00 weighted points

Original evidence -32.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -32.0; Money-gated reading -81.5 × 25% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, poverty, insecurity and weak formal employment impose heavy cash, time and survival burdens on ordinary families. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Mali, conflict, poverty, insecurity and weak formal employment impose heavy cash, time and survival burdens on ordinary families.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.1× 35%= -29.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-38.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -13.30 weighted points

Original evidence -38.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -38.0; Money-gated reading -83.1 × 35% = -29.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, poverty, insecurity and weak formal employment impose heavy cash, time and survival burdens on ordinary families. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-86.4× 25%= -21.6 points
Exact point calculation

-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points

Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.0; Money-gated reading -86.4 × 25% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, employment-to-population ratio is a labour-market indicator. It does not reveal domestic care work, multiple-job overlap, commuting or daily disposable time for a family of five. Retain the earlier authored Human Time judgment until a specific time-use series is verified.

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, poverty, insecurity and weak formal employment impose heavy cash, time and survival burdens on ordinary families. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-84.1× 15%= -12.6 points
Exact point calculation

-41.33 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.20 weighted points

Original evidence -41.3; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -41.3; Money-gated reading -84.1 × 15% = -12.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, poverty, insecurity and weak formal employment impose heavy cash, time and survival burdens on ordinary families. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.38 + -29.10 + -21.60 + -12.61 = -83.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -40.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -40.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -83.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-40.0 Original evidence category score-40.0 Contribution to national evidence score-3.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -8.00 + -13.30 + -12.50 + -6.20 = -40.00

Base: -40.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -40.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -40.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -3.60 points

For Mali, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes -3.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Mali: employment ratio is context, not family time

For Mali, employment-to-population ratio is a labour-market indicator. It does not reveal domestic care work, multiple-job overlap, commuting or daily disposable time for a family of five. Retain the earlier authored Human Time judgment until a specific time-use series is verified.

2026-10-14 World Bank WDI — employment-to-population ratio
Mali: human time burden — rail 4 review

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, poverty, insecurity and weak formal employment impose heavy cash, time and survival burdens on ordinary families. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: human time burden — rail 3 review

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, poverty, insecurity and weak formal employment impose heavy cash, time and survival burdens on ordinary families. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: human time burden — rail 2 review

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, poverty, insecurity and weak formal employment impose heavy cash, time and survival burdens on ordinary families. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: human time burden — rail 1 review

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, poverty, insecurity and weak formal employment impose heavy cash, time and survival burdens on ordinary families. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Human time burden

For Mali, conflict, poverty, insecurity and weak formal employment impose heavy cash, time and survival burdens on ordinary families.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Mali
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-85.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -45.0

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-85.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.9× 25%= -20.7 points
Exact point calculation

-37.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -9.25 weighted points

Original evidence -37.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -37.0; Money-gated reading -82.9 × 25% = -20.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Poverty, displacement and weak urban/rural infrastructure make adequate dependable shelter difficult to reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Mali, poverty, displacement and weak urban/rural infrastructure make adequate dependable shelter difficult to reach.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-84.5× 35%= -29.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.25/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-43.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -15.05 weighted points

Original evidence -43.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -43.0; Money-gated reading -84.5 × 35% = -29.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Poverty, displacement and weak urban/rural infrastructure make adequate dependable shelter difficult to reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-87.8× 25%= -21.9 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.8 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Poverty, displacement and weak urban/rural infrastructure make adequate dependable shelter difficult to reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.4× 15%= -12.8 points
Exact point calculation

-46.33 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.95 weighted points

Original evidence -46.3; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -46.3; Money-gated reading -85.4 × 15% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Poverty, displacement and weak urban/rural infrastructure make adequate dependable shelter difficult to reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.72 + -29.58 + -21.94 + -12.81 = -85.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -45.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -45.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -85.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-45.0 Original evidence category score-45.0 Contribution to national evidence score-3.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -9.25 + -15.05 + -13.75 + -6.95 = -45.00

Base: -45.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -45.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -45.00 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -3.60 points

For Mali, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes -3.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Mali: housing shelter reach — rail 4 review

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Poverty, displacement and weak urban/rural infrastructure make adequate dependable shelter difficult to reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: housing shelter reach — rail 3 review

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Poverty, displacement and weak urban/rural infrastructure make adequate dependable shelter difficult to reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: housing shelter reach — rail 2 review

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Poverty, displacement and weak urban/rural infrastructure make adequate dependable shelter difficult to reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: housing shelter reach — rail 1 review

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Poverty, displacement and weak urban/rural infrastructure make adequate dependable shelter difficult to reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Housing and shelter reach

For Mali, poverty, displacement and weak urban/rural infrastructure make adequate dependable shelter difficult to reach.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Mali
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-82.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence -35.0

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-82.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.2× 25%= -20.0 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -27.0; Money-gated reading -80.2 × 25% = -20.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Agricultural and pastoral capacity are central to life, but insecurity, climate shocks and poverty produce major food-access gaps. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Mali, agricultural and pastoral capacity are central to life, but insecurity, climate shocks and poverty produce major food-access gaps.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.8× 35%= -28.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -33.0; Money-gated reading -81.8 × 35% = -28.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Agricultural and pastoral capacity are central to life, but insecurity, climate shocks and poverty produce major food-access gaps. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.0× 25%= -21.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -85.0 × 25% = -21.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Agricultural and pastoral capacity are central to life, but insecurity, climate shocks and poverty produce major food-access gaps. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.7× 15%= -12.4 points
Exact point calculation

-36.33 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -5.45 weighted points

Original evidence -36.3; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -36.3; Money-gated reading -82.7 × 15% = -12.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Agricultural and pastoral capacity are central to life, but insecurity, climate shocks and poverty produce major food-access gaps. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.04 + -28.63 + -21.26 + -12.40 = -82.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -35.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -82.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-35.0 Original evidence category score-35.0 Contribution to national evidence score-3.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -5.45 = -35.00

Base: -35.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -35.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -3.15 points

For Mali, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes -3.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Mali: food nourishment free food — rail 4 review

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Agricultural and pastoral capacity are central to life, but insecurity, climate shocks and poverty produce major food-access gaps. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: food nourishment free food — rail 3 review

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Agricultural and pastoral capacity are central to life, but insecurity, climate shocks and poverty produce major food-access gaps. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: food nourishment free food — rail 2 review

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Agricultural and pastoral capacity are central to life, but insecurity, climate shocks and poverty produce major food-access gaps. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: food nourishment free food — rail 1 review

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Agricultural and pastoral capacity are central to life, but insecurity, climate shocks and poverty produce major food-access gaps. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Food and nourishment reach

For Mali, agricultural and pastoral capacity are central to life, but insecurity, climate shocks and poverty produce major food-access gaps.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Mali
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-81.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence -30.0

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-81.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-78.8× 25%= -19.7 points
Exact point calculation

-22.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -5.50 weighted points

Original evidence -22.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -22.0; Money-gated reading -78.8 × 25% = -19.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Water access and sanitation remain uneven, especially in rural and conflict-affected areas where distance and infrastructure matter. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Mali, water access and sanitation remain uneven, especially in rural and conflict-affected areas where distance and infrastructure matter.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.4× 35%= -28.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.25/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-28.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -9.80 weighted points

Original evidence -28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -28.0; Money-gated reading -80.4 × 35% = -28.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Water access and sanitation remain uneven, especially in rural and conflict-affected areas where distance and infrastructure matter. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.7× 25%= -20.9 points
Exact point calculation

-40.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -10.00 weighted points

Original evidence -40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -40.0; Money-gated reading -83.7 × 25% = -20.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Water access and sanitation remain uneven, especially in rural and conflict-affected areas where distance and infrastructure matter. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.3× 15%= -12.2 points
Exact point calculation

-31.33 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -4.70 weighted points

Original evidence -31.3; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -31.3; Money-gated reading -81.3 × 15% = -12.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Water access and sanitation remain uneven, especially in rural and conflict-affected areas where distance and infrastructure matter. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.70 + -28.15 + -20.92 + -12.20 = -81.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -30.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -30.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -81.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-30.0 Original evidence category score-30.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -5.50 + -9.80 + -10.00 + -4.70 = -30.00

Base: -30.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -30.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -30.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.80 points

For Mali, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Mali: water sanitation — rail 4 review

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Water access and sanitation remain uneven, especially in rural and conflict-affected areas where distance and infrastructure matter. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: water sanitation — rail 3 review

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Water access and sanitation remain uneven, especially in rural and conflict-affected areas where distance and infrastructure matter. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: water sanitation — rail 2 review

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Water access and sanitation remain uneven, especially in rural and conflict-affected areas where distance and infrastructure matter. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: water sanitation — rail 1 review

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Water access and sanitation remain uneven, especially in rural and conflict-affected areas where distance and infrastructure matter. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Water and sanitation reach

For Mali, water access and sanitation remain uneven, especially in rural and conflict-affected areas where distance and infrastructure matter.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Mali
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-85.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -45.0

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-85.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.9× 25%= -20.7 points
Exact point calculation

-37.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -9.25 weighted points

Original evidence -37.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -37.0; Money-gated reading -82.9 × 25% = -20.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Low electricity access and reliability impose large household and productive friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Mali, low electricity access and reliability impose large household and productive friction.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-84.5× 35%= -29.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.25/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-43.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -15.05 weighted points

Original evidence -43.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -43.0; Money-gated reading -84.5 × 35% = -29.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Low electricity access and reliability impose large household and productive friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-87.8× 25%= -21.9 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.8 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Low electricity access and reliability impose large household and productive friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.4× 15%= -12.8 points
Exact point calculation

-46.33 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.95 weighted points

Original evidence -46.3; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -46.3; Money-gated reading -85.4 × 15% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Low electricity access and reliability impose large household and productive friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.72 + -29.58 + -21.94 + -12.81 = -85.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -45.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -45.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -85.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-45.0 Original evidence category score-45.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -9.25 + -15.05 + -13.75 + -6.95 = -45.00

Base: -45.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -45.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -45.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -2.25 points

For Mali, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Mali: energy household capability — rail 4 review

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Low electricity access and reliability impose large household and productive friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: energy household capability — rail 3 review

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Low electricity access and reliability impose large household and productive friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: energy household capability — rail 2 review

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Low electricity access and reliability impose large household and productive friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: energy household capability — rail 1 review

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Low electricity access and reliability impose large household and productive friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Household energy capability

For Mali, low electricity access and reliability impose large household and productive friction.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Mali
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-82.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence -35.0

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-82.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-80.2× 25%= -20.0 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -27.0; Money-gated reading -80.2 × 25% = -20.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Health services continue with international and public support, while distance, staffing, insecurity and household costs weaken reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Mali, health services continue with international and public support, while distance, staffing, insecurity and household costs weaken reach.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.8× 35%= -28.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 0.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -33.0; Money-gated reading -81.8 × 35% = -28.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Health services continue with international and public support, while distance, staffing, insecurity and household costs weaken reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-85.0× 25%= -21.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -85.0 × 25% = -21.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Health services continue with international and public support, while distance, staffing, insecurity and household costs weaken reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-82.7× 15%= -12.4 points
Exact point calculation

-36.33 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -5.45 weighted points

Original evidence -36.3; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -36.3; Money-gated reading -82.7 × 15% = -12.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Health services continue with international and public support, while distance, staffing, insecurity and household costs weaken reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.04 + -28.63 + -21.26 + -12.40 = -82.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -35.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -82.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-35.0 Original evidence category score-35.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -5.45 = -35.00

Base: -35.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -35.00 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -2.45 points

For Mali, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Mali: health care reach — rail 4 review

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Health services continue with international and public support, while distance, staffing, insecurity and household costs weaken reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: health care reach — rail 3 review

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Health services continue with international and public support, while distance, staffing, insecurity and household costs weaken reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: health care reach — rail 2 review

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Health services continue with international and public support, while distance, staffing, insecurity and household costs weaken reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: health care reach — rail 1 review

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Health services continue with international and public support, while distance, staffing, insecurity and household costs weaken reach. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Health-care reach

For Mali, health services continue with international and public support, while distance, staffing, insecurity and household costs weaken reach.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Mali
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-83.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence -40.0

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-83.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-81.5× 25%= -20.4 points
Exact point calculation

-32.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.00 weighted points

Original evidence -32.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -32.0; Money-gated reading -81.5 × 25% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Education services are heavily disrupted by insecurity, displacement and resource constraints in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Mali, education services are heavily disrupted by insecurity, displacement and resource constraints in affected regions.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-83.1× 35%= -29.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-38.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -13.30 weighted points

Original evidence -38.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -38.0; Money-gated reading -83.1 × 35% = -29.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Education services are heavily disrupted by insecurity, displacement and resource constraints in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-86.4× 25%= -21.6 points
Exact point calculation

-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points

Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.0; Money-gated reading -86.4 × 25% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Education services are heavily disrupted by insecurity, displacement and resource constraints in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-84.1× 15%= -12.6 points
Exact point calculation

-41.33 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.20 weighted points

Original evidence -41.3; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -41.3; Money-gated reading -84.1 × 15% = -12.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Education services are heavily disrupted by insecurity, displacement and resource constraints in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.38 + -29.10 + -21.60 + -12.61 = -83.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -40.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -40.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -83.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-40.0 Original evidence category score-40.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.4
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -8.00 + -13.30 + -12.50 + -6.20 = -40.00

Base: -40.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -40.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -40.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -2.40 points

For Mali, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Mali: education human capability — rail 4 review

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Education services are heavily disrupted by insecurity, displacement and resource constraints in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: education human capability — rail 3 review

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Education services are heavily disrupted by insecurity, displacement and resource constraints in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: education human capability — rail 2 review

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Education services are heavily disrupted by insecurity, displacement and resource constraints in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: education human capability — rail 1 review

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Education services are heavily disrupted by insecurity, displacement and resource constraints in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Education and human capability

For Mali, education services are heavily disrupted by insecurity, displacement and resource constraints in affected regions.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Mali
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-85.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -45.0

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-85.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-82.9× 25%= -20.7 points
Exact point calculation

-37.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -9.25 weighted points

Original evidence -37.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -37.0; Money-gated reading -82.9 × 25% = -20.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Long distances, road quality, insecurity and fares make mobility expensive and sometimes unsafe. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Mali, long distances, road quality, insecurity and fares make mobility expensive and sometimes unsafe.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-84.5× 35%= -29.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.25/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

-43.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -15.05 weighted points

Original evidence -43.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -43.0; Money-gated reading -84.5 × 35% = -29.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Long distances, road quality, insecurity and fares make mobility expensive and sometimes unsafe. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-87.8× 25%= -21.9 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.8 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Long distances, road quality, insecurity and fares make mobility expensive and sometimes unsafe. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-85.4× 15%= -12.8 points
Exact point calculation

-46.33 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.95 weighted points

Original evidence -46.3; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -46.3; Money-gated reading -85.4 × 15% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Long distances, road quality, insecurity and fares make mobility expensive and sometimes unsafe. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.72 + -29.58 + -21.94 + -12.81 = -85.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -45.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -45.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -85.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-45.0 Original evidence category score-45.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -9.25 + -15.05 + -13.75 + -6.95 = -45.00

Base: -45.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -45.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -45.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.80 points

For Mali, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Mali: mobility reachability — rail 4 review

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Long distances, road quality, insecurity and fares make mobility expensive and sometimes unsafe. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: mobility reachability — rail 3 review

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Long distances, road quality, insecurity and fares make mobility expensive and sometimes unsafe. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: mobility reachability — rail 2 review

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Long distances, road quality, insecurity and fares make mobility expensive and sometimes unsafe. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: mobility reachability — rail 1 review

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Long distances, road quality, insecurity and fares make mobility expensive and sometimes unsafe. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mobility and reachability

For Mali, long distances, road quality, insecurity and fares make mobility expensive and sometimes unsafe.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Mali
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-67.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +19.0

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-67.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-65.5× 25%= -16.4 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +27.0; Money-gated reading -65.5 × 25% = -16.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: The 2024 fertility rate exceeds the 5.0 TBFC target and earns full fertility performance, but conflict, health, housing and economic pressures keep the lived family environment strongly negative. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Mali, the 2024 fertility rate exceeds the 5.0 TBFC target and earns full fertility performance, but conflict, health, housing and economic pressures keep the lived family environment strongly negative.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-67.1× 35%= -23.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +21.0; Money-gated reading -67.1 × 35% = -23.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: The 2024 fertility rate exceeds the 5.0 TBFC target and earns full fertility performance, but conflict, health, housing and economic pressures keep the lived family environment strongly negative. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-70.4× 25%= -17.6 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +9.0; Money-gated reading -70.4 × 25% = -17.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: The 2024 fertility rate exceeds the 5.0 TBFC target and earns full fertility performance, but conflict, health, housing and economic pressures keep the lived family environment strongly negative. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-68.0× 15%= -10.2 points
Exact point calculation

-36.33 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -5.45 weighted points

Original evidence -36.3; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +17.7; Money-gated reading -68.0 × 15% = -10.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: The 2024 fertility rate exceeds the 5.0 TBFC target and earns full fertility performance, but conflict, health, housing and economic pressures keep the lived family environment strongly negative. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.37 + -23.49 + -17.59 + -10.20 = -67.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -35.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): +54.0. Effective evidence: +19.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -67.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-35.0 Published family-method adjustment+54.0 Original evidence category score+19.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -5.45 = -35.00

Base: 19.00 · reviewed adjustment: 54.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +19.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 19.00 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.52 points

Why the family-method adjustment is applied

New and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. Family Formation = 60% lived family environment (-35.00) + 40% fertility performance (100.00) from TFR 5.510 (2024); final 19.00. Documentation review 2026-10-14: historic four-rail numerical assessment preserved; links support country context, not exact numeric point precision. 100% means source/rail documentation, NOT nationally verified no-payment access.

For Mali, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +19.0

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Not recognized in reviewed legal-status evidence

Deduction calculation: 50 × 0 = 0 points

Final category calculation: +19.0 − 0 = +19.0 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Mali: no generally available nationwide domestic same-sex civil marriage is recorded by the 2026-10-10 legal-status review. Country is included in the 2026 legal-status survey under a status other than generally available domestic civil marriage. This describes legal status, not a demonstrated effect on birth rates.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2026-10-10 (access date; verify publication date in linked source) · Reviewed: 2026-10-10

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Mali: family formation stability — rail 4 review

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: The 2024 fertility rate exceeds the 5.0 TBFC target and earns full fertility performance, but conflict, health, housing and economic pressures keep the lived family environment strongly negative. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: family formation stability — rail 3 review

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: The 2024 fertility rate exceeds the 5.0 TBFC target and earns full fertility performance, but conflict, health, housing and economic pressures keep the lived family environment strongly negative. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: family formation stability — rail 2 review

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: The 2024 fertility rate exceeds the 5.0 TBFC target and earns full fertility performance, but conflict, health, housing and economic pressures keep the lived family environment strongly negative. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: family formation stability — rail 1 review

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: The 2024 fertility rate exceeds the 5.0 TBFC target and earns full fertility performance, but conflict, health, housing and economic pressures keep the lived family environment strongly negative. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Family formation and stability

For Mali, the 2024 fertility rate exceeds the 5.0 TBFC target and earns full fertility performance, but conflict, health, housing and economic pressures keep the lived family environment strongly negative.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Mali

Published indicators

Total fertility rate5.51 births per woman

World Bank WDI via FRED — Mali fertility · 2024

Source
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-78.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence -20.0

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-78.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-76.1× 25%= -19.0 points
Exact point calculation

-12.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -3.00 weighted points

Original evidence -12.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -12.0; Money-gated reading -76.1 × 25% = -19.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Large rural land systems support livelihoods, but tenure, conflict and infrastructure prevent broad secure spatial freedom. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Mali, large rural land systems support livelihoods, but tenure, conflict and infrastructure prevent broad secure spatial freedom.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-77.7× 35%= -27.2 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.25/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-18.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -6.30 weighted points

Original evidence -18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -18.0; Money-gated reading -77.7 × 35% = -27.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Large rural land systems support livelihoods, but tenure, conflict and infrastructure prevent broad secure spatial freedom. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-81.0× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.0; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Large rural land systems support livelihoods, but tenure, conflict and infrastructure prevent broad secure spatial freedom. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-78.6× 15%= -11.8 points
Exact point calculation

-21.33 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -3.20 weighted points

Original evidence -21.3; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -21.3; Money-gated reading -78.6 × 15% = -11.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Large rural land systems support livelihoods, but tenure, conflict and infrastructure prevent broad secure spatial freedom. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -19.02 + -27.20 + -20.24 + -11.79 = -78.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -20.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -20.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -78.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-20.0 Original evidence category score-20.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -3.00 + -6.30 + -7.50 + -3.20 = -20.00

Base: -20.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -20.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -20.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.00 points

For Mali, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Mali: land spatial freedom — rail 4 review

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Large rural land systems support livelihoods, but tenure, conflict and infrastructure prevent broad secure spatial freedom. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: land spatial freedom — rail 3 review

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Large rural land systems support livelihoods, but tenure, conflict and infrastructure prevent broad secure spatial freedom. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: land spatial freedom — rail 2 review

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Large rural land systems support livelihoods, but tenure, conflict and infrastructure prevent broad secure spatial freedom. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: land spatial freedom — rail 1 review

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Large rural land systems support livelihoods, but tenure, conflict and infrastructure prevent broad secure spatial freedom. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Land and spatial freedom

For Mali, large rural land systems support livelihoods, but tenure, conflict and infrastructure prevent broad secure spatial freedom.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Mali
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-87.8↓

Money-gated · Evidence -55.0

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-87.8Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-85.6× 25%= -21.4 points
Exact point calculation

-47.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.75 weighted points

Original evidence -47.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -47.0; Money-gated reading -85.6 × 25% = -21.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Armed conflict and extremist violence sharply reduce everyday peace and safe public life in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Mali, armed conflict and extremist violence sharply reduce everyday peace and safe public life in affected regions.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-87.2× 35%= -30.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-53.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -18.55 weighted points

Original evidence -53.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -53.0; Money-gated reading -87.2 × 35% = -30.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Armed conflict and extremist violence sharply reduce everyday peace and safe public life in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-90.5× 25%= -22.6 points
Exact point calculation

-65.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -16.25 weighted points

Original evidence -65.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -65.0; Money-gated reading -90.5 × 25% = -22.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Armed conflict and extremist violence sharply reduce everyday peace and safe public life in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-88.1× 15%= -13.2 points
Exact point calculation

-56.33 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -8.45 weighted points

Original evidence -56.3; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -56.3; Money-gated reading -88.1 × 15% = -13.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Armed conflict and extremist violence sharply reduce everyday peace and safe public life in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -21.40 + -30.53 + -22.62 + -13.22 = -87.8

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -55.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -55.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -87.8.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-55.0 Original evidence category score-55.0 Contribution to national evidence score-3.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -11.75 + -18.55 + -16.25 + -8.45 = -55.00

Base: -55.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -55.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -55.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -3.30 points

For Mali, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes -3.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Mali: peace beauty delight — rail 4 review

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Armed conflict and extremist violence sharply reduce everyday peace and safe public life in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: peace beauty delight — rail 3 review

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Armed conflict and extremist violence sharply reduce everyday peace and safe public life in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: peace beauty delight — rail 2 review

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Armed conflict and extremist violence sharply reduce everyday peace and safe public life in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: peace beauty delight — rail 1 review

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Armed conflict and extremist violence sharply reduce everyday peace and safe public life in affected regions. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Peace, beauty and delight

For Mali, armed conflict and extremist violence sharply reduce everyday peace and safe public life in affected regions.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Mali
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-82.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence -35.0

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-82.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-80.2× 25%= -20.0 points
Exact point calculation

-27.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.75 weighted points

Original evidence -27.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -27.0; Money-gated reading -80.2 × 25% = -20.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Drought, conflict, displacement and food insecurity create severe resilience pressure despite community adaptation. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Mali, drought, conflict, displacement and food insecurity create severe resilience pressure despite community adaptation.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-81.8× 35%= -28.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-33.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -11.55 weighted points

Original evidence -33.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -33.0; Money-gated reading -81.8 × 35% = -28.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Drought, conflict, displacement and food insecurity create severe resilience pressure despite community adaptation. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-85.0× 25%= -21.3 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -11.25 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -85.0 × 25% = -21.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Drought, conflict, displacement and food insecurity create severe resilience pressure despite community adaptation. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-82.7× 15%= -12.4 points
Exact point calculation

-36.33 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -5.45 weighted points

Original evidence -36.3; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -36.3; Money-gated reading -82.7 × 15% = -12.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Drought, conflict, displacement and food insecurity create severe resilience pressure despite community adaptation. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.04 + -28.63 + -21.26 + -12.40 = -82.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -35.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -82.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-35.0 Original evidence category score-35.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -6.75 + -11.55 + -11.25 + -5.45 = -35.00

Base: -35.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -35.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -2.10 points

For Mali, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Mali: living ground resilience — rail 4 review

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Drought, conflict, displacement and food insecurity create severe resilience pressure despite community adaptation. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: living ground resilience — rail 3 review

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Drought, conflict, displacement and food insecurity create severe resilience pressure despite community adaptation. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: living ground resilience — rail 2 review

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Drought, conflict, displacement and food insecurity create severe resilience pressure despite community adaptation. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: living ground resilience — rail 1 review

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Drought, conflict, displacement and food insecurity create severe resilience pressure despite community adaptation. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Living-ground resilience

For Mali, drought, conflict, displacement and food insecurity create severe resilience pressure despite community adaptation.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Mali
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-85.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence -45.0

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-85.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-82.9× 25%= -20.7 points
Exact point calculation

-37.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -9.25 weighted points

Original evidence -37.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -37.0; Money-gated reading -82.9 × 25% = -20.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, military governance, insecurity and weak legal reach create high justice and safety friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Mali, conflict, military governance, insecurity and weak legal reach create high justice and safety friction.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-84.5× 35%= -29.6 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-43.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -15.05 weighted points

Original evidence -43.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -43.0; Money-gated reading -84.5 × 35% = -29.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, military governance, insecurity and weak legal reach create high justice and safety friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-87.8× 25%= -21.9 points
Exact point calculation

-55.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -13.75 weighted points

Original evidence -55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.0; Money-gated reading -87.8 × 25% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, military governance, insecurity and weak legal reach create high justice and safety friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-85.4× 15%= -12.8 points
Exact point calculation

-46.33 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.95 weighted points

Original evidence -46.3; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -46.3; Money-gated reading -85.4 × 15% = -12.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, military governance, insecurity and weak legal reach create high justice and safety friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.72 + -29.58 + -21.94 + -12.81 = -85.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -45.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -45.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -85.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-45.0 Original evidence category score-45.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -9.25 + -15.05 + -13.75 + -6.95 = -45.00

Base: -45.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -45.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -45.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -2.25 points

For Mali, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Mali: justice safety friction — rail 4 review

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, military governance, insecurity and weak legal reach create high justice and safety friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: justice safety friction — rail 3 review

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, military governance, insecurity and weak legal reach create high justice and safety friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: justice safety friction — rail 2 review

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, military governance, insecurity and weak legal reach create high justice and safety friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: justice safety friction — rail 1 review

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Conflict, military governance, insecurity and weak legal reach create high justice and safety friction. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Justice, safety and institutional friction

For Mali, conflict, military governance, insecurity and weak legal reach create high justice and safety friction.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Mali
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-83.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence -40.0

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-83.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-81.5× 25%= -20.4 points
Exact point calculation

-32.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -8.00 weighted points

Original evidence -32.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -32.0; Money-gated reading -81.5 × 25% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Infrastructure damage, low maintenance capacity and limited circular-return systems weaken material durability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

For Mali, infrastructure damage, low maintenance capacity and limited circular-return systems weaken material durability.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-83.1× 35%= -29.1 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

-38.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -13.30 weighted points

Original evidence -38.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -38.0; Money-gated reading -83.1 × 35% = -29.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Infrastructure damage, low maintenance capacity and limited circular-return systems weaken material durability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-86.4× 25%= -21.6 points
Exact point calculation

-50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -12.50 weighted points

Original evidence -50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -50.0; Money-gated reading -86.4 × 25% = -21.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Infrastructure damage, low maintenance capacity and limited circular-return systems weaken material durability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-84.1× 15%= -12.6 points
Exact point calculation

-41.33 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -6.20 weighted points

Original evidence -41.3; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -41.3; Money-gated reading -84.1 × 15% = -12.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Infrastructure damage, low maintenance capacity and limited circular-return systems weaken material durability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.38 + -29.10 + -21.60 + -12.61 = -83.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -40.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -40.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -83.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-40.0 Original evidence category score-40.0 Contribution to national evidence score-1.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -8.00 + -13.30 + -12.50 + -6.20 = -40.00

Base: -40.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -40.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -40.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -1.60 points

Material transfers: scored in International Footprint

Exporter responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint); importer responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint). Material movement is a real workload; these are TBF authored judgments, not certified illegal dumping estimates. Each role is included ONCE in the Footprint 3.1 published score.

Accepted imported garbageAudit pending
Accepted low-utility dumpingAudit pending

The material-transfer burden already affects the published score. Facility-specific downstream harm remains a separate research claim. No second penalty is added for the same trade.

For Mali, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes -1.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +6.0

What the evidence found

Mali: durability material return — rail 4 review

For Mali, time, reliability, resilience and practical family benefit. Prior researched country observation: Infrastructure damage, low maintenance capacity and limited circular-return systems weaken material durability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: durability material return — rail 3 review

For Mali, costs, gatekeeping, recurring household payments and dependency. Prior researched country observation: Infrastructure damage, low maintenance capacity and limited circular-return systems weaken material durability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: durability material return — rail 2 review

For Mali, reach to ordinary families and geographic/financial exclusions. Prior researched country observation: Infrastructure damage, low maintenance capacity and limited circular-return systems weaken material durability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Mali: durability material return — rail 1 review

For Mali, available productive capacity and relevant national systems. Prior researched country observation: Infrastructure damage, low maintenance capacity and limited circular-return systems weaken material durability. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 World Bank — Mali
Durability and material return

For Mali, infrastructure damage, low maintenance capacity and limited circular-return systems weaken material durability.

2026-10-06 World Bank — Mali
6% weight International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
-63.7↓

Money-gated · Evidence +33.5

International score breakdown

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

-63.7Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Entry Accessibility 25%
See all nine International Welcome Entry Accessibility scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-64.7× 25%= -16.2 points
Exact point calculation

30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -64.7 × 25% = -16.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Lawful entry and practical travel options, visa rules and reachable borders. Prior researched country observation: Mali hosts a substantial refugee and asylum-seeker population from neighbouring countries, and many receive refugee status without individual determination. Conflict and strained services sharply limit practical welcome after admission. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Mali hosts a substantial refugee and asylum-seeker population from neighbouring countries, and many receive refugee status without individual determination. Conflict and strained services sharply limit practical welcome after admission.

🤔
Migrant Practical Life 30%
See all nine International Welcome Migrant Practical Life scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-67.4× 30%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

20.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points

Original evidence +20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +20.0; Money-gated reading -67.4 × 30% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Migration, residency and actual ability to live safely with services. Prior researched country observation: Mali hosts a substantial refugee and asylum-seeker population from neighbouring countries, and many receive refugee status without individual determination. Conflict and strained services sharply limit practical welcome after admission. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome 25%
See all nine International Welcome Refugee / Neighbour Welcome scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-56.5× 25%= -14.1 points
Exact point calculation

60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points

Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -56.5 × 25% = -14.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Refugee reception, host communities and international protection. Prior researched country observation: Mali hosts a substantial refugee and asylum-seeker population from neighbouring countries, and many receive refugee status without individual determination. Conflict and strained services sharply limit practical welcome after admission. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Flexibility / Continuity 20%
See all nine International Welcome Flexibility / Continuity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-66.0× 20%= -13.2 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 5.00 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -66.0 × 20% = -13.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Family unity, citizenship continuity and predictable renewal of stay. Prior researched country observation: Mali hosts a substantial refugee and asylum-seeker population from neighbouring countries, and many receive refugee status without individual determination. Conflict and strained services sharply limit practical welcome after admission. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -16.16 + -20.21 + -14.13 + -13.21 = -63.7

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +33.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +33.5. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -63.7.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+33.5 Original evidence category score+33.5 Contribution to national evidence score+2.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 7.50 + 6.00 + 15.00 + 5.00 = 33.50

Base: 33.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +33.5 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 33.50 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 2.01 points

For Mali, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

Mali: international access human welcome — rail 4 review

Family unity, citizenship continuity and predictable renewal of stay. Prior researched country observation: Mali hosts a substantial refugee and asylum-seeker population from neighbouring countries, and many receive refugee status without individual determination. Conflict and strained services sharply limit practical welcome after admission. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNHCR — Mali
Mali: international access human welcome — rail 3 review

Refugee reception, host communities and international protection. Prior researched country observation: Mali hosts a substantial refugee and asylum-seeker population from neighbouring countries, and many receive refugee status without individual determination. Conflict and strained services sharply limit practical welcome after admission. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNHCR — Mali
Mali: international access human welcome — rail 2 review

Migration, residency and actual ability to live safely with services. Prior researched country observation: Mali hosts a substantial refugee and asylum-seeker population from neighbouring countries, and many receive refugee status without individual determination. Conflict and strained services sharply limit practical welcome after admission. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNHCR — Mali
Mali: international access human welcome — rail 1 review

Lawful entry and practical travel options, visa rules and reachable borders. Prior researched country observation: Mali hosts a substantial refugee and asylum-seeker population from neighbouring countries, and many receive refugee status without individual determination. Conflict and strained services sharply limit practical welcome after admission. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 UNHCR — Mali
International accessibility, migration and human welcome

Mali hosts a substantial refugee and asylum-seeker population from neighbouring countries, and many receive refugee status without individual determination. Conflict and strained services sharply limit practical welcome after admission.

2026-10-06 UNHCR — Mali
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-82.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence -36.0

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-82.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Positive Contribution 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-81.0× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.0; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Helpful international contributions and transferable capacity. Prior researched country observation: Mali’s security crisis, regional tensions and reliance on foreign security forces produce a negative low-harm footprint and have reduced cooperative regional trust. Refugee hosting provides some counterweight but does not erase the wider harms. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

Mali’s security crisis, regional tensions and reliance on foreign security forces produce a negative low-harm footprint and have reduced cooperative regional trust. Refugee hosting provides some counterweight but does not erase the wider harms.

🤔
Mutuality / Local Benefit 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-81.0× 25%= -20.2 points
Exact point calculation

-30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.50 weighted points

Original evidence -30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.0; Money-gated reading -81.0 × 25% = -20.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Mutuality, dignity and shared benefit to residents and partner communities. Prior researched country observation: Mali’s security crisis, regional tensions and reliance on foreign security forces produce a negative low-harm footprint and have reduced cooperative regional trust. Refugee hosting provides some counterweight but does not erase the wider harms. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Documented Harm / Extraction 35%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-85.0× 35%= -29.8 points
Exact point calculation

-45.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = -15.75 weighted points

Original evidence -45.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -45.0; Money-gated reading -85.0 × 35% = -29.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

External social/ecological harm and attempted repair. Prior researched country observation: Mali’s security crisis, regional tensions and reliance on foreign security forces produce a negative low-harm footprint and have reduced cooperative regional trust. Refugee hosting provides some counterweight but does not erase the wider harms. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Accountability / Repair 15%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-82.3× 15%= -12.4 points
Exact point calculation

-35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = -5.25 weighted points

Original evidence -35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -35.0; Money-gated reading -82.3 × 15% = -12.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Trade-flow scrutiny: volume/handling unknown unless a dated customs record is present. Prior researched country observation: Mali’s security crisis, regional tensions and reliance on foreign security forces produce a negative low-harm footprint and have reduced cooperative regional trust. Refugee hosting provides some counterweight but does not erase the wider harms. HS3915 export/import weights and destination-processing pathways were not independently confirmed in this pass; no illegal dumping or zero trade is asserted. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -20.24 + -20.24 + -29.77 + -12.35 = -82.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: -36.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: -36.0. Money Gate ceiling: -45.6. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -82.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal-36.0 Original evidence category score-36.0 Contribution to national evidence score-2.2
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: -7.50 + -7.50 + -15.75 + -5.25 = -36.00

Base: -36.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -36.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -36.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -2.16 points

Material transfers: scored in International Footprint

Exporter responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint); importer responsibility: 0.00/100 (15% of footprint). Material movement is a real workload; these are TBF authored judgments, not certified illegal dumping estimates. Each role is included ONCE in the Footprint 3.1 published score.

Exported waste / garbageRole: 0.00/100 · scored
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingRole: 0.00/100 · scored

The material-transfer burden already affects the published score. Facility-specific downstream harm remains a separate research claim. No second penalty is added for the same trade.

For Mali, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Mali’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

Mali: external footprint non extractive — rail 4 review

Trade-flow scrutiny: volume/handling unknown unless a dated customs record is present. Prior researched country observation: Mali’s security crisis, regional tensions and reliance on foreign security forces produce a negative low-harm footprint and have reduced cooperative regional trust. Refugee hosting provides some counterweight but does not erase the wider harms. HS3915 export/import weights and destination-processing pathways were not independently confirmed in this pass; no illegal dumping or zero trade is asserted. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Reuters — Mali security crisis
Mali: external footprint non extractive — rail 3 review

External social/ecological harm and attempted repair. Prior researched country observation: Mali’s security crisis, regional tensions and reliance on foreign security forces produce a negative low-harm footprint and have reduced cooperative regional trust. Refugee hosting provides some counterweight but does not erase the wider harms. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Reuters — Mali security crisis
Mali: external footprint non extractive — rail 2 review

Mutuality, dignity and shared benefit to residents and partner communities. Prior researched country observation: Mali’s security crisis, regional tensions and reliance on foreign security forces produce a negative low-harm footprint and have reduced cooperative regional trust. Refugee hosting provides some counterweight but does not erase the wider harms. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Reuters — Mali security crisis
Mali: external footprint non extractive — rail 1 review

Helpful international contributions and transferable capacity. Prior researched country observation: Mali’s security crisis, regional tensions and reliance on foreign security forces produce a negative low-harm footprint and have reduced cooperative regional trust. Refugee hosting provides some counterweight but does not erase the wider harms. Point values are TBF authored judgements; cited source supplies context and cannot alone verify full reach or the exact score.

2026-10-14 Reuters — Mali security crisis
External footprint and non-extractive global conduct

Mali’s security crisis, regional tensions and reliance on foreign security forces produce a negative low-harm footprint and have reduced cooperative regional trust. Refugee hosting provides some counterweight but does not erase the wider harms.

2026-10-06 Reuters — Mali security crisis

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.