Skip to Abundance content

World Wealthiest Country · Abundance history

Åland Islands 🇦🇽 · Country History

Movement in the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, measured through access to life rather than GDP or money. Every archived point adjustment and source remains available; unchanged observations are condensed by date, not deleted.

World Wealthiest Country · Recorded rank history

16 meaningful rank/score point(s)

Dots mark initial readings and rank or score changes; unchanged readings extend a dated interval. Select a dot for the score and related archived events.

Selected rank observation

Ranking changed

Recorded rank movement.

Rank#26 → #25National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Peer identities were not stored for this older rank event; missing before/after rankings cannot be reconstructed.

Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #26 to #25 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#26 → #25National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Liechtenstein #4 → #49; points -48.73 → -57.04

Every recorded change

Each archived event is preserved. Category details and sources begin from the first detailed country snapshot; older records remain visible without invented comparisons.

Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #26 to #25 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#26 → #25National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Liechtenstein #4 → #49; points -48.73 → -57.04
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #27 to #26 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#27 → #26National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Falkland Islands #4 → #41; points -48.59 → -56.34
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #27 to #26 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#27 → #26National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Falkland Islands #4 → #41; points -48.59 → -56.34
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #28 to #27 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#28 → #27National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Sweden #3 → #52; points -46.31 → -57.38
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved down from #21 to #28 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#21 → #28National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Positions first recorded above (not confirmed rank jumps) (7)

  1. Tokelau First recorded here at #2; earlier position unavailable
  2. San Marino First recorded here at #4; earlier position unavailable
  3. Falkland Islands First recorded here at #5; earlier position unavailable
  4. Liechtenstein First recorded here at #6; earlier position unavailable
  5. Saint Pierre and Miquelon First recorded here at #10; earlier position unavailable
  6. Andorra First recorded here at #14; earlier position unavailable
  7. Brunei First recorded here at #15; earlier position unavailable
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved down from #21 to #24 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#21 → #24National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Positions first recorded above (not confirmed rank jumps) (3)

  1. San Marino First recorded here at #3; earlier position unavailable
  2. Liechtenstein First recorded here at #4; earlier position unavailable
  3. Brunei First recorded here at #11; earlier position unavailable
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #22 to #21 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#22 → #21National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Andorra #9 → #196; points -49.97 → -49.97
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #23 to #22 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#23 → #22National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Saint Pierre and Miquelon #6 → #235
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #24 to #23 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#24 → #23National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Liechtenstein #3 → #223; points -48.73 → -48.73
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #25 to #24 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#25 → #24National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Falkland Islands #3 → #217
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #26 to #25 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#26 → #25National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. San Marino #3 → #236
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #27 to #25 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#27 → #25National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (2)

  1. San Marino #4 → #236; points -47.91 → -47.91
  2. Tokelau #2 → #241
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #27 to #26 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#27 → #26National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Tokelau #2 → #241
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #28 to #27 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#28 → #27National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (1)

  1. Brunei #15 → #220; points -50.29 → -50.29
Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved down from #27 to #28 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#27 → #28National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

No peer movements were archived for this older rank event.

Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #28 to #27 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#28 → #27National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

No peer movements were archived for this older rank event.

Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #37 to #28 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#37 → #28National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (9)

  1. Oman #29 → #29; points -52.03 → -53.95
  2. Monaco #27 → #30; points -50.78 → -54.00
  3. Martinique #32 → #31; points -52.95 → -54.72
  4. Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba #33 → #33; points -53.21 → -55.09
  5. Jersey #30 → #36; points -52.58 → -55.26
  6. Slovakia #34 → #37; points -53.46 → -55.52
  7. Austria #35 → #38; points -53.56 → -55.55
  8. Cocos (Keeling) Islands #31 → #39; points -52.89 → -55.80
  9. Guernsey #36 → #42; points -53.78 → -56.58

This older event recorded only one side of the movement. Other crossing countries were not archived and cannot be reliably named.

Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #34 to #28 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#34 → #28National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (6)

  1. Oman #29 → #29; points -52.03 → -53.95
  2. Monaco #26 → #30; points -50.78 → -54.00
  3. Martinique #31 → #31; points -52.95 → -54.72
  4. Jersey #30 → #36; points -52.58 → -55.26
  5. Slovakia #32 → #37; points -53.46 → -53.46
  6. Guernsey #33 → #42; points -53.78 → -56.58

This older event recorded only one side of the movement. Other crossing countries were not archived and cannot be reliably named.

Ranking changed

Rank#36 → #27National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Peer identities were not stored for this older rank event; missing before/after rankings cannot be reconstructed.

Ranking changed

TBF Abundance rank moved up from #37 to #34 as the published ranking changed. The country-data update clock did not move unless its own dataset also changed.

Rank#37 → #34National score-53.91 → -53.91

Rank moved while this country’s points stayed unchanged.

Countries that fell below this country (3)

  1. Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba #33 → #41; points -53.21 → -53.21
  2. Austria #35 → #44; points -53.56 → -53.56
  3. Cocos (Keeling) Islands #31 → #47; points -52.89 → -52.89

This older event recorded only one side of the movement. Other crossing countries were not archived and cannot be reliably named.

Full country evidence and Money Gate rescan

Full category and direct Money Gate source-specific Åland review. Åland remains a Finnish autonomous territory. TBF authored comparison is a separate ideal benchmark, not earned national evidence. Waste transfers include recoverable material. Old snapshots preserved.

National points: -37.26 → -53.91; Rank: #2 → #37

Durability, Repair & Material Return

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score68.4059.90
Base category score68.4059.90
Research coverage (%)92.0075.00
Capacity (25%)82.0077.00
Reach (35%)68.0065.00
Friction / Waste (25%)52.0035.00
Return / Circularity (15%)74.0061.00

Category point adjustment: -8.50 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Education & Human Capability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score90.9091.50
Base category score90.9091.50
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Reach (35%)92.0094.00
Friction (25%)86.0085.00
Return / Capability (15%)88.0089.00

Category point adjustment: +0.60 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Energy & Household Capability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score78.9073.15
Base category score78.9073.15
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)92.0091.00
Reach (35%)82.0078.00
Friction (25%)62.0048.00
Return / Burden Removed (15%)78.0074.00

Category point adjustment: -5.75 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score75.6025.25
Base category score75.6025.25
Research coverage (%)88.0086.00
Positive Contribution (25%)76.0050.00
Mutuality / Local Benefit (25%)80.0047.00
Documented Harm / Extraction (35%)72.0035.00
Accountability / Repair (15%)76.00-20.00

Category point adjustment: -50.35 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 25, 20, 30]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

International Scoring 1.0.0: 25% positive contribution, 25% mutual benefit, 35% non-extractive/low-harm conduct, 15% accountability/repair, judged relative to capacity.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score39.7128.87
Base category score39.7128.87
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)84.0081.00
Reach (35%)72.0066.00
Friction (25%)55.0043.00
Return / Continuity (15%)68.0063.00

Category point adjustment: -10.84 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, family 60/40 fertility TFR 1.291; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Family Fertility Method 1.0.0: 60% lived-family rails + 40% fertility performance (-5.95/100 from TFR 1.580, 2023, observed).

Sources archived before (2)
Sources archived after the change (6)

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score68.1064.05
Base category score68.1064.05
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Reach (35%)68.0064.00
Friction / Waste (25%)52.0042.00
Return / Multiplication (15%)62.0061.00

Category point adjustment: -4.05 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Health & Care Reach

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score87.1078.80
Base category score87.1078.80
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)94.0091.00
Reach (35%)90.0084.00
Friction (25%)78.0058.00
Return / Prevention (15%)84.0081.00

Category point adjustment: -8.30 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score60.0053.70
Base category score60.0053.70
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)86.0082.00
Reach (35%)58.0056.00
Friction (25%)38.0022.00
Return / Durability (15%)58.0054.00

Category point adjustment: -6.30 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Human Time & Burden Return

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score77.2556.05
Base category score77.2556.05
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)88.0075.00
Reach (35%)78.0060.00
Friction (25%)65.0040.00
Return / Regeneration (15%)78.0042.00

Category point adjustment: -21.20 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score73.8056.20
Base category score73.8056.20
Research coverage (%)88.0086.00
Entry Accessibility (25%)76.0070.00
Migrant Practical Life (30%)78.0051.00
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome (25%)68.0060.00
Flexibility / Continuity (20%)72.0042.00

Category point adjustment: -17.60 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 30, 25, 20]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

International Scoring 1.0.0: 25% entry accessibility, 30% migrant practical life, 25% refugee/neighbour welcome, 20% flexibility/continuity. No eVisa >100-nationality adjustment claimed unless independently verified.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score89.5080.95
Base category score89.5080.95
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)95.0093.00
Reach (35%)92.0083.00
Friction (25%)85.0066.00
Return / Reliability (15%)82.0081.00

Category point adjustment: -8.55 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score50.8042.20
Base category score50.8042.20
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)70.0075.00
Reach (35%)50.0042.00
Friction / Concentration (25%)32.008.00
Return / Productive Ground (15%)52.0045.00

Category point adjustment: -8.60 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score82.6069.25
Base category score82.6069.25
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)90.0086.00
Reach / Ecological Function (35%)84.0076.00
Friction / Loss (25%)70.0042.00
Return / Regeneration (15%)88.0071.00

Category point adjustment: -13.35 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Mobility & Reachability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score66.8058.05
Base category score66.8058.05
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)80.0078.00
Reach (35%)70.0064.00
Friction (25%)52.0031.00
Return / Time (15%)62.0056.00

Category point adjustment: -8.75 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score92.9088.70
Base category score92.9088.70
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)96.0095.00
Reach (35%)94.0089.00
Friction (25%)90.0080.00
Return / Delight (15%)90.0092.00

Category point adjustment: -4.20 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Water & Sanitation Abundance

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score89.3079.60
Base category score89.3079.60
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)96.0092.00
Reach (35%)92.0086.00
Friction / Loss (25%)82.0061.00
Return / Regeneration (15%)84.0075.00

Category point adjustment: -9.70 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)
Sources archived with this rescan (64)
Category and evidence update

Water & Sanitation Abundance changed from 89.3 to 79.6. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Water & Sanitation Abundance

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score89.3079.60
Base category score89.3079.60
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)96.0092.00
Reach (35%)92.0086.00
Friction / Loss (25%)82.0061.00
Return / Regeneration (15%)84.0075.00

Category point adjustment: -9.70 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)
Category and evidence update

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight changed from 92.9 to 88.7. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score92.9088.70
Base category score92.9088.70
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)96.0095.00
Reach (35%)94.0089.00
Friction (25%)90.0080.00
Return / Delight (15%)90.0092.00

Category point adjustment: -4.20 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)
Category and evidence update

Mobility & Reachability changed from 66.8 to 58.05. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Mobility & Reachability

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score66.8058.05
Base category score66.8058.05
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)80.0078.00
Reach (35%)70.0064.00
Friction (25%)52.0031.00
Return / Time (15%)62.0056.00

Category point adjustment: -8.75 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)
Category and evidence update

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience changed from 82.6 to 69.25. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score82.6069.25
Base category score82.6069.25
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)90.0086.00
Reach / Ecological Function (35%)84.0076.00
Friction / Loss (25%)70.0042.00
Return / Regeneration (15%)88.0071.00

Category point adjustment: -13.35 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)
Category and evidence update

Land Access & Spatial Freedom changed from 50.8 to 42.2. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score50.8042.20
Base category score50.8042.20
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)70.0075.00
Reach (35%)50.0042.00
Friction / Concentration (25%)32.008.00
Return / Productive Ground (15%)52.0045.00

Category point adjustment: -8.60 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)
Category and evidence update

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction changed from 89.5 to 80.95. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score89.5080.95
Base category score89.5080.95
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)95.0093.00
Reach (35%)92.0083.00
Friction (25%)85.0066.00
Return / Reliability (15%)82.0081.00

Category point adjustment: -8.55 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)
Category and evidence update

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome changed from 73.8 to 56.2. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score73.8056.20
Base category score73.8056.20
Research coverage (%)88.0086.00
Entry Accessibility (25%)76.0070.00
Migrant Practical Life (30%)78.0051.00
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome (25%)68.0060.00
Flexibility / Continuity (20%)72.0042.00

Category point adjustment: -17.60 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 30, 25, 20]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

International Scoring 1.0.0: 25% entry accessibility, 30% migrant practical life, 25% refugee/neighbour welcome, 20% flexibility/continuity. No eVisa >100-nationality adjustment claimed unless independently verified.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)
Category and evidence update

Human Time & Burden Return changed from 77.25 to 56.05. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Human Time & Burden Return

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score77.2556.05
Base category score77.2556.05
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)88.0075.00
Reach (35%)78.0060.00
Friction (25%)65.0040.00
Return / Regeneration (15%)78.0042.00

Category point adjustment: -21.20 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)
Category and evidence update

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach changed from 60 to 53.7. Review the recorded rails, explanation and source records below.

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

Category fieldBeforeAfter
Published category score60.0053.70
Base category score60.0053.70
Research coverage (%)92.0086.00
Capacity (25%)86.0082.00
Reach (35%)58.0056.00
Friction (25%)38.0022.00
Return / Durability (15%)58.0054.00

Category point adjustment: -6.30 category points

Updated reasoning

Full comparative audit 2026-10-11, Method 3.1, four-rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]; sources in 4 evidence rails. Authored evaluation not government statistic.

Earlier reasoning

Category Method 0.0.1: 25% Capacity, 35% Reach, 25% Friction, 15% Return/Regeneration.

Sources archived before (1)
Sources archived after the change (5)

Load at the Speed of Light

Add App 🚀
×
Princess Keilah Studio