Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile
French Polynesia 🇵🇫
French Polynesia currently ranks #43 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -56.71. This territory is money-gated (4.25/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Delight and weakest in Land across 16 evidence categories.
Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.
Country profile & diagnostic reading
Tracking baselineHistorical tracking baselineHow the headline score is calculated
Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.
Current evidence: +42.8 · Money Gate: 4.25/20 · Headline: -56.7.
The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.
TBF Rank TBF Rank Rank compares only published profiles. It follows the TBF Abundance Score, not GDP or money size, and can move when a country score changes or when another country enters the published table. Read Small Island Abundance Theory Challenge a score or supply new evidenceHeads of state, authorized representatives and evidence holders may submit documentation and request recalculation. A review never silently overwrites the previous rank or scoring record.Appeal French Polynesia's score or request recalculation →
Global standing based on life reachability
243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries
French PolynesiaLast recorded move: down from #42 to #43.Recent recorded movements
- #42 → #4323 Oct 2026 · 19:04 GMT-0500
- #43 → #4223 Oct 2026 · 11:21 GMT-0500
- #44 → #4322 Oct 2026 · 20:33 GMT-0500
- #36 → #4420 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
Rank journey · newest first
Dated changes with readable spacing · diagonal lines show rank movement · horizontal lines show held positions · scroll left for earlier dates.
Research Coverage Research coverage Coverage reports the weighted share of categories with documented scoring and supporting source records. 100% means all category scoring slots have been assessed; it does not guarantee that every claim has been independently measured or that every family has no-payment access. Read the source and evidence limitations for each point. Explore Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
Coverage calculation
Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:
9.0 × 92.0% + 8.0 × 92.0% + 9.0 × 92.0% + 6.0 × 92.0% + 5.0 × 92.0% + 7.0 × 92.0% + 6.0 × 92.0% + 4.0 × 92.0% + 8.0 × 92.0% + 5.0 × 92.0% + 6.0 × 92.0% + 6.0 × 92.0% + 5.0 × 92.0% + 4.0 × 92.0% + 6.0 × 88.0% + 6.0 × 88.0% = 91.52% weighted coverage
Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.
Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.
14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored
GDP and money rank GDP and money rank GDP and money rank are context only. They track monetized production, not how freely people access life, and contribute zero points to TBF Abundance. Read Make the World Truly Productive Again
GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking
Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0
Five basics stand between this country and zero The zero-line rule All five basics must reach 4/4 before a country can cross zero. Open any gate reading to see exactly why its points were assigned and review the source record. Reach-to-Money-Gate Clearance 2.0 These five gates measure effective no-payment access, not installed capacity alone. Under new source-backed reviews, 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 points track verified free access to 0%, some but less than 30%, 30%+, 50%+, 75%+ and 100% of the population respectively. The higher levels require reliable real use; 4/4 requires universally accessible, reliable service without ordinary charges or exclusions. Missing population figures remain pending. Older gate points remain archived until re-audited.
Food Food · 4 points Full credit means nutritious food is ordinary civilization provision without a checkout or poverty test. School meals and other narrow institutional routes can earn limited partial credit without being mistaken for free food abundance. Read A Civilization Laid Out in Orchards
Why 0.5 / 4?
Evidence supports 0.5/4: real public/community or productive-food capacity is credited, but ordinary nutritious food is not nationally reachable without payment.
Point calculation
0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.
Housing / Land Housing / Land · 4 points Full credit means families can secure a home or suitable productive ground without rent, purchase price or mortgage debt deciding whether they may remain sheltered and grounded. Read the Distributed Founding Nuclei Strategy
Why 0.5 / 4?
Evidence supports 0.5/4: public/non-market or tenure routes receive partial credit where real, but ordinary family shelter or productive land is not universally zero-payment.
Point calculation
0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.
Healthcare Healthcare · 4 points Full credit requires dependable no-payment care across prevention, primary care, maternity, dentistry, medicine, emergency treatment and necessary specialist care. Read Money Zombie Outbreaks
Why 2.0 / 4?
Evidence supports 2.0/4: public or zero-payment health reach is credited where verified; eligibility, dental/medicine/specialist costs, distance or insurance prevent a full 4/4 unless the standard is truly universal.
Point calculation
2.00 ÷ 4 × 100 = 50.00% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.
Transportation Transportation · 4 points Full credit means ordinary movement is free across the routes people actually need. A free Sunday, one route or a temporary promotion earns only limited credit. Read The Caterport: Free Human Movement
Why 0.5 / 4?
Evidence supports 0.5/4: free/subsidized routes receive credit, but ordinary mobility is not universally zero-fare and frictionless.
Point calculation
0.50 ÷ 4 × 100 = 12.50% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.
Water / Energy Water / Energy · 4 points Full credit requires both safe water and essential household energy to stay available without payment deciding whether cooking, cooling, washing, pumping or food preservation stops. Read Nucleus Formation Stewards
Why 0.8 / 4?
Evidence supports 0.75/4: public capacity/subsidy is credited, while household water and essential energy remain payment-, geography- or reliability-gated.
Point calculation
0.75 ÷ 4 × 100 = 18.75% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.
Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.
Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.
- Food0.5 / 4
- Housing / Land0.5 / 4
- Healthcare2.0 / 4
- Transportation0.5 / 4
- Water / Energy0.8 / 4
- Money still needed15.8 / 20
Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.
Why 4.3 / 20?
The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.
Actual calculation
Food 0.50 + Housing / Land 0.50 + Healthcare 2.00 + Transportation 0.50 + Water / Energy 0.75 = 4.25 / 20
A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.
Why 46.1 / 100?
Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.
Actual calculation
(100 - 7.76) ÷ 2 = 46.12 / 100
The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.
Why -39.4?
Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.
Actual calculation
-50 + 2.5 × 4.25 = -39.4
16-category profile
All categories at a glance
All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.
Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.
Category readings & evidence
Open any category for the full diagnostic reading
9% weight
Human Time & Burden Return
What this category measures
Whether productivity, infrastructure and institutions return usable lifetime to people and families.
TBFC targetNecessary contribution should not require people to sell most of their waking life merely to retain access to food, shelter, care and ordinary family life. Access-gate research questionHow much paid work or income-producing activity is required before an ordinary household can keep access to basic life, and what usable family time remains afterward? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Family Shubaka: protecting human and family time
-58.5↓Money-gated · Evidence +36.9
Money-gated · Evidence +36.9
Score breakdown
Human Time & Burden Return
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points
Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -51.5 × 25% = -12.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public health, education and social systems provide meaningful capacity, but the dispersed archipelago still requires cash for housing, imported food, energy, transport and many services.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
44.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 15.40 weighted points
Original evidence +44.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +44.0; Money-gated reading -56.4 × 35% = -19.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public health, education and social systems provide meaningful capacity, but the dispersed archipelago still requires cash for housing, imported food, energy, transport and many services.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
2.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.50 weighted points
Original evidence +2.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +2.0; Money-gated reading -69.1 × 25% = -17.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public health, education and social systems provide meaningful capacity, but the dispersed archipelago still requires cash for housing, imported food, energy, transport and many services.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points
Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -57.6 × 15% = -8.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public health, education and social systems provide meaningful capacity, but the dispersed archipelago still requires cash for housing, imported food, energy, transport and many services.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +36.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +36.9. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.5.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 15.00 + 15.40 + 0.50 + 6.00 = 36.90
Base: 36.90 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +36.9 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 36.90 × (9.00 × 92.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 3.34 points
For French Polynesia, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 92% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.28%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +16.0
What the evidence found
For French Polynesia, public health, education and social systems provide meaningful capacity, but the dispersed archipelago still requires cash for housing, imported food, energy, transport and many services.
ISPF / Government of French Polynesia
8% weight
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
What this category measures
Whether adequate shelter physically exists and actually reaches people without excessive cost, exclusion or vacancy mismatch.
TBFC targetAdequate family shelter should remain reachable without lifetime dependence on rent, mortgage debt or ability to pay. Access-gate research questionWhat share of ordinary shelter access depends on rent, mortgage debt, purchase price or other recurring payment, and what dependable non-market routes exist at national scale? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Mother-Sight compound home
-60.5↓Money-gated · Evidence +30.2
Money-gated · Evidence +30.2
Score breakdown
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
Exact point calculation
60.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.00 weighted points
Original evidence +60.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +60.0; Money-gated reading -51.5 × 25% = -12.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public and family housing routes exist, yet land prices around Tahiti, construction/import costs and island concentration constrain ordinary reach.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
36.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 12.60 weighted points
Original evidence +36.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +36.0; Money-gated reading -58.8 × 35% = -20.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public and family housing routes exist, yet land prices around Tahiti, construction/import costs and island concentration constrain ordinary reach.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
-10.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -2.50 weighted points
Original evidence -10.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -10.0; Money-gated reading -72.7 × 25% = -18.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public and family housing routes exist, yet land prices around Tahiti, construction/import costs and island concentration constrain ordinary reach.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
34.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.10 weighted points
Original evidence +34.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +34.0; Money-gated reading -59.4 × 15% = -8.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public and family housing routes exist, yet land prices around Tahiti, construction/import costs and island concentration constrain ordinary reach.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +30.2. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +30.2. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -60.5.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 15.00 + 12.60 + -2.50 + 5.10 = 30.20
Base: 30.20 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +30.2 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 30.20 × (8.00 × 92.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 2.43 points
For French Polynesia, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 92% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.36%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +24.0
What the evidence found
For French Polynesia, public and family housing routes exist, yet land prices around Tahiti, construction/import costs and island concentration constrain ordinary reach.
ISPF / Government of French Polynesia
9% weight
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
What this category measures
Physical food and nutrient capacity, nourishment reach, waste/loss, public edible landscapes and free food access.
TBFC targetNutritious food should exist in multiplying abundance and remain reachable even when a household has no money to spend. Access-gate research questionCan people obtain adequate nutritious food when they cannot pay, and are free/public/productive-food routes large enough to be ordinary rather than exceptional? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Complete Reordering of Earth’s Food System
-56.7↓Money-gated · Evidence +42.9
Money-gated · Evidence +42.9
Score breakdown
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -48.5 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, fishing, gardens and local foods provide genuine productive capacity, while much ordinary food remains imported and purchased.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Food 0.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -54.5 × 35% = -19.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, fishing, gardens and local foods provide genuine productive capacity, while much ordinary food remains imported and purchased.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
5.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 1.25 weighted points
Original evidence +5.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +5.0; Money-gated reading -68.2 × 25% = -17.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, fishing, gardens and local foods provide genuine productive capacity, while much ordinary food remains imported and purchased.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
44.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.60 weighted points
Original evidence +44.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +44.0; Money-gated reading -56.4 × 15% = -8.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, fishing, gardens and local foods provide genuine productive capacity, while much ordinary food remains imported and purchased.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +42.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +42.9. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -56.7.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + 1.25 + 6.60 = 42.85
Base: 42.85 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +42.9 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 42.85 × (9.00 × 92.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 3.88 points
For French Polynesia, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 92% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.28%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
For French Polynesia, fishing, gardens and local foods provide genuine productive capacity, while much ordinary food remains imported and purchased.
ISPF / Government of French Polynesia
6% weight
Water & Sanitation Abundance
What this category measures
Safe water, sanitation, reliability, capture, reuse, storage and living-landscape water capacity.
TBFC targetSafe water and sanitation should be dependable life infrastructure, not conditional on household purchasing power. Access-gate research questionCan households retain safe water and sanitation when income falls, and which payment, disconnection or infrastructure barriers interrupt access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
-53.5↓Money-gated · Evidence +53.3
Money-gated · Evidence +53.3
Score breakdown
Water & Sanitation Abundance
Exact point calculation
76.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 19.00 weighted points
Original evidence +76.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +76.0; Money-gated reading -46.7 × 25% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public systems are strong on main islands but geographic dispersion creates unequal infrastructure reach and household payment/maintenance friction.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.75/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
62.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.70 weighted points
Original evidence +62.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +62.0; Money-gated reading -50.9 × 35% = -17.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public systems are strong on main islands but geographic dispersion creates unequal infrastructure reach and household payment/maintenance friction.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
18.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points
Original evidence +18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +18.0; Money-gated reading -64.2 × 25% = -16.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public systems are strong on main islands but geographic dispersion creates unequal infrastructure reach and household payment/maintenance friction.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
54.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.10 weighted points
Original evidence +54.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +54.0; Money-gated reading -53.3 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public systems are strong on main islands but geographic dispersion creates unequal infrastructure reach and household payment/maintenance friction.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +53.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +53.3. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -53.5.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 19.00 + 21.70 + 4.50 + 8.10 = 53.30
Base: 53.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +53.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 53.30 × (6.00 × 92.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 3.21 points
For French Polynesia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 92% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.52%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +14.0
What the evidence found
For French Polynesia, public systems are strong on main islands but geographic dispersion creates unequal infrastructure reach and household payment/maintenance friction.
ISPF / Government of French Polynesia
5% weight
Energy & Household Capability
What this category measures
Whether usable, reliable energy reaches households and removes burdens across water, food, health, cooling, cooking and movement.
TBFC targetEssential household energy should support cooking, cooling, water, food preservation and care without money becoming the switch that turns basic capability on or off. Access-gate research questionCan households retain essential energy for cooking, cooling, water and food preservation when they cannot pay, and how often does price or disconnection reduce capability? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Solar Moon Panel
-56.7↓Money-gated · Evidence +42.9
Money-gated · Evidence +42.9
Score breakdown
Energy & Household Capability
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -48.5 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, hydro/solar and public investment improve resilience, while electricity and fuel remain paid necessities and outer islands face higher logistics cost.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 0.75/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -54.5 × 35% = -19.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, hydro/solar and public investment improve resilience, while electricity and fuel remain paid necessities and outer islands face higher logistics cost.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
4.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 1.00 weighted points
Original evidence +4.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +4.0; Money-gated reading -68.5 × 25% = -17.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, hydro/solar and public investment improve resilience, while electricity and fuel remain paid necessities and outer islands face higher logistics cost.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
46.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.90 weighted points
Original evidence +46.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +46.0; Money-gated reading -55.7 × 15% = -8.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, hydro/solar and public investment improve resilience, while electricity and fuel remain paid necessities and outer islands face higher logistics cost.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +42.9. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +42.9. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -56.7.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 17.50 + 1.00 + 6.90 = 42.90
Base: 42.90 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +42.9 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 42.90 × (5.00 × 92.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 2.16 points
For French Polynesia, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 92% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.60%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.2 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
For French Polynesia, hydro/solar and public investment improve resilience, while electricity and fuel remain paid necessities and outer islands face higher logistics cost.
ISPF / Government of French Polynesia
7% weight
Health & Care Reach
What this category measures
Whether prevention, primary care, medicine, maternity care, dentistry and specialist capability reach people when needed.
TBFC targetPrevention, maternity, dentistry, medicine and necessary treatment should be reachable because care is needed, not because payment can be produced. Access-gate research questionCan necessary care be obtained because it is needed, or do price, insurance, employment, debt or other financial tests materially delay or prevent access? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: No Shrugging Our Shoulders at Family Suffering
-53.2↓Money-gated · Evidence +54.3
Money-gated · Evidence +54.3
Score breakdown
Health & Care Reach
Exact point calculation
76.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 19.00 weighted points
Original evidence +76.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +76.0; Money-gated reading -46.7 × 25% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, the territorial health system provides broad public reach, but island geography, specialist concentration and some household costs still create friction.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 2.00/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
62.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 21.70 weighted points
Original evidence +62.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +62.0; Money-gated reading -50.9 × 35% = -17.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, the territorial health system provides broad public reach, but island geography, specialist concentration and some household costs still create friction.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
22.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 5.50 weighted points
Original evidence +22.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +22.0; Money-gated reading -63.0 × 25% = -15.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, the territorial health system provides broad public reach, but island geography, specialist concentration and some household costs still create friction.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
54.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.10 weighted points
Original evidence +54.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +54.0; Money-gated reading -53.3 × 15% = -8.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, the territorial health system provides broad public reach, but island geography, specialist concentration and some household costs still create friction.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +54.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +54.3. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -53.2.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 19.00 + 21.70 + 5.50 + 8.10 = 54.30
Base: 54.30 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +54.3 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 54.30 × (7.00 × 92.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 3.82 points
For French Polynesia, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 92% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.44%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +14.0
What the evidence found
For French Polynesia, the territorial health system provides broad public reach, but island geography, specialist concentration and some household costs still create friction.
ISPF / Government of French Polynesia
6% weight
Education & Human Capability
What this category measures
Foundational learning plus practical, technical and enduring civilization capability retained by people.
TBFC targetFoundational learning and useful capability should be reachable as part of civilization life rather than purchased according to family income. Access-gate research questionWhich essential learning and capability routes are genuinely reachable regardless of family income, and where do fees, debt or paid enrichment create decisive access gaps? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: What Is NoDumbDumbs?
-51.5↓Money-gated · Evidence +60.0
Money-gated · Evidence +60.0
Score breakdown
Education & Human Capability
Exact point calculation
80.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 20.00 weighted points
Original evidence +80.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +80.0; Money-gated reading -45.4 × 25% = -11.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public schooling and local tertiary institutions provide broad capability, though outer-island and advanced-study access remains unequal.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
68.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 23.80 weighted points
Original evidence +68.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +68.0; Money-gated reading -49.1 × 35% = -17.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public schooling and local tertiary institutions provide broad capability, though outer-island and advanced-study access remains unequal.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
30.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points
Original evidence +30.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +30.0; Money-gated reading -60.6 × 25% = -15.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public schooling and local tertiary institutions provide broad capability, though outer-island and advanced-study access remains unequal.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
58.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 8.70 weighted points
Original evidence +58.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +58.0; Money-gated reading -52.1 × 15% = -7.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, public schooling and local tertiary institutions provide broad capability, though outer-island and advanced-study access remains unequal.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +60.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +60.0. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -51.5.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 20.00 + 23.80 + 7.50 + 8.70 = 60.00
Base: 60.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +60.0 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 60.00 × (6.00 × 92.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 3.62 points
For French Polynesia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 92% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.52%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +12.0
What the evidence found
For French Polynesia, public schooling and local tertiary institutions provide broad capability, though outer-island and advanced-study access remains unequal.
ISPF / Government of French Polynesia
4% weight
Mobility & Reachability
What this category measures
Local, regional and national movement that connects people to family, services, work, learning and public life without consuming excessive time.
TBFC targetOrdinary local and regional movement should be available for family, care, learning and civic life without travel becoming a paywall. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary people reach family, care, learning and public life without high recurring fares, vehicle costs, debt or fuel dependence? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: The Caterport: Free Human Movement
-60.1↓Money-gated · Evidence +31.6
Money-gated · Evidence +31.6
Score breakdown
Mobility & Reachability
Exact point calculation
58.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 14.50 weighted points
Original evidence +58.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +58.0; Money-gated reading -52.1 × 25% = -13.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, extreme geographic dispersion makes air and sea movement essential and expensive; local roads alone cannot solve family access across the territory.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
- -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
- -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
- -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
- -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
- 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
- +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
- +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
- +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
- +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation
38.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 13.30 weighted points
Original evidence +38.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +38.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, extreme geographic dispersion makes air and sea movement essential and expensive; local roads alone cannot solve family access across the territory.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
-6.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -1.50 weighted points
Original evidence -6.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -6.0; Money-gated reading -71.5 × 25% = -17.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, extreme geographic dispersion makes air and sea movement essential and expensive; local roads alone cannot solve family access across the territory.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points
Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +35.0; Money-gated reading -59.1 × 15% = -8.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, extreme geographic dispersion makes air and sea movement essential and expensive; local roads alone cannot solve family access across the territory.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +31.6. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +31.6. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -60.1.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 14.50 + 13.30 + -1.50 + 5.25 = 31.55
Base: 31.55 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +31.6 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 31.55 × (4.00 × 92.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 1.27 points
For French Polynesia, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 92% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 3.68%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +20.0
What the evidence found
For French Polynesia, extreme geographic dispersion makes air and sea movement essential and expensive; local roads alone cannot solve family access across the territory.
ISPF / Government of French Polynesia
8% weight
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
What this category measures
Conditions that let people form stable families, raise children, multiply generations, share parental time and continue family life without punishing material barriers. New and re-reviewed profiles include total fertility as an explicit outcome signal.
TBFC targetPeople should be able to form, continue and multiply family life. Trott Bailey Family Civilization uses 5.0 children per woman as the fertility target; 2.1 is the replacement floor, not the aspiration, while housing, care, food and time should not be withheld behind financial thresholds. Access-gate research questionHow strongly do housing, childcare, health, food and work-income requirements delay or destabilize family formation and continuity, and is total fertility moving above replacement toward the 5.0-children-per-woman civilization target? Fertility methodNew and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Courtship, Marriage & Married Life
-64.7↓Money-gated · Evidence +16.5
Money-gated · Evidence +16.5
Score breakdown
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
Exact point calculation
58.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 14.50 weighted points
Original evidence +58.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +47.8; Money-gated reading -55.2 × 25% = -13.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, the official 2024 TFR of 1.7 is below replacement; public family and health systems help, but housing, transport and cost pressures remain.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
34.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 11.90 weighted points
Original evidence +34.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +23.8; Money-gated reading -62.5 × 35% = -21.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, the official 2024 TFR of 1.7 is below replacement; public family and health systems help, but housing, transport and cost pressures remain.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
-20.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -5.00 weighted points
Original evidence -20.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -30.2; Money-gated reading -78.8 × 25% = -19.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, the official 2024 TFR of 1.7 is below replacement; public family and health systems help, but housing, transport and cost pressures remain.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
35.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 5.25 weighted points
Original evidence +35.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +24.8; Money-gated reading -62.2 × 15% = -9.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, total fertility rate: 1.70 births per woman
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +26.7. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -10.2. Effective evidence: +16.5. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -64.7.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 14.50 + 11.90 + -5.00 + 5.25 = 26.65
Base: 16.47 · reviewed adjustment: -10.18 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +16.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 16.47 × (8.00 × 92.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 1.32 points
New and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. Family Fertility Method 1.0.0: 60% lived-family rails + 40% fertility performance (1.19/100 from TFR 1.700, 2024, observed).
For French Polynesia, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 92% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.36%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion
First half — the established family and fertility assessment
The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.
Pre-policy score: +16.5
Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion
This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.
Country legal status: Pending verification
Deduction calculation: Pending; 0 points deducted provisionally, not a verified zero
Final category calculation: +16.5 − 0 = +16.5 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)
Legal status not independently reviewed for this jurisdiction; no deduction is assigned. Pending is not a confirmed absence of recognition.
Fertility and family policy: research and source notes
Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.
How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.
How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.
Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).
Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.
Abundance Gap: +24.0
What the evidence found
For French Polynesia, the official 2024 TFR of 1.7 is below replacement; public family and health systems help, but housing, transport and cost pressures remain.
Institut de la statistique de la Polynésie française — Bilan démographique 2024Published indicators
Institut de la statistique de la Polynésie française — Bilan démographique 2024 · 2024
Source
5% weight
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
What this category measures
Whether land and settlement choice reach ordinary people rather than opportunity being functionally trapped inside expensive commercial centres.
TBFC targetSuitable productive land and settlement opportunity should not be functionally reserved for those able to outbid everyone else. Access-gate research questionCan ordinary families gain secure use of suitable productive ground without first accumulating enough money to purchase, finance or outbid others? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Compounds Are Civilization Circulation Systems
-65.3↓Money-gated · Evidence +14.5
Money-gated · Evidence +14.5
Score breakdown
Land Access & Spatial Freedom
Exact point calculation
48.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 12.00 weighted points
Original evidence +48.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +48.0; Money-gated reading -55.1 × 25% = -13.8 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, family/customary tenure provides some non-market continuity, while Tahiti land scarcity, title complexity and market prices constrain spatial freedom.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.50/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
16.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 5.60 weighted points
Original evidence +16.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +16.0; Money-gated reading -64.8 × 35% = -22.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, family/customary tenure provides some non-market continuity, while Tahiti land scarcity, title complexity and market prices constrain spatial freedom.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
-28.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -7.00 weighted points
Original evidence -28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -28.0; Money-gated reading -78.2 × 25% = -19.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, family/customary tenure provides some non-market continuity, while Tahiti land scarcity, title complexity and market prices constrain spatial freedom.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
26.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.90 weighted points
Original evidence +26.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +26.0; Money-gated reading -61.8 × 15% = -9.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, family/customary tenure provides some non-market continuity, while Tahiti land scarcity, title complexity and market prices constrain spatial freedom.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +14.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +14.5. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -65.3.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 12.00 + 5.60 + -7.00 + 3.90 = 14.50
Base: 14.50 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +14.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 14.50 × (5.00 × 92.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 0.73 points
For French Polynesia, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 92% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.60%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.7 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +32.0
What the evidence found
For French Polynesia, family/customary tenure provides some non-market continuity, while Tahiti land scarcity, title complexity and market prices constrain spatial freedom.
ISPF / Government of French Polynesia
6% weight
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
What this category measures
Peace of mind, social support, everyday safety, public beauty, recreation, nature, culture and delight reachable without constant payment.
TBFC targetBeauty, nature, recreation, rest and public delight should belong to ordinary life rather than appearing mainly after payment. Access-gate research questionHow much everyday rest, nature, recreation, culture and public beauty is freely reachable, rather than principally accessed through paid venues, travel or private property? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Trott Bailey Kingdom Systems
-48.0↓Money-gated · Evidence +71.6
Money-gated · Evidence +71.6
Score breakdown
Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
Exact point calculation
86.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 21.50 weighted points
Original evidence +86.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +86.0; Money-gated reading -43.6 × 25% = -10.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, ocean, beaches, mountains, lagoons and Polynesian cultural life create exceptionally high ordinary beauty and public delight.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
76.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.60 weighted points
Original evidence +76.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +76.0; Money-gated reading -46.7 × 35% = -16.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, ocean, beaches, mountains, lagoons and Polynesian cultural life create exceptionally high ordinary beauty and public delight.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
52.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 13.00 weighted points
Original evidence +52.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +52.0; Money-gated reading -53.9 × 25% = -13.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, ocean, beaches, mountains, lagoons and Polynesian cultural life create exceptionally high ordinary beauty and public delight.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.50 weighted points
Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -48.5 × 15% = -7.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, ocean, beaches, mountains, lagoons and Polynesian cultural life create exceptionally high ordinary beauty and public delight.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +71.6. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +71.6. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -48.0.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 21.50 + 26.60 + 13.00 + 10.50 = 71.60
Base: 71.60 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +71.6 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 71.60 × (6.00 × 92.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 4.32 points
For French Polynesia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 92% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.52%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +4.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +10.0
What the evidence found
For French Polynesia, ocean, beaches, mountains, lagoons and Polynesian cultural life create exceptionally high ordinary beauty and public delight.
ISPF / Government of French Polynesia
6% weight
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
What this category measures
Whether soil, forests, wetlands, habitat, pollinators, species and water-holding landscapes are strengthening rather than being consumed.
TBFC targetRegenerating soil, water, habitat and food-bearing landscapes should be maintained as shared life-supporting capacity rather than only where a transaction makes them profitable. Access-gate research questionAre regenerative land, water and habitat functions maintained as life-supporting infrastructure even when no direct commercial return is available? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Water Your Orchards With Life
-51.8↓Money-gated · Evidence +59.1
Money-gated · Evidence +59.1
Score breakdown
Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
Exact point calculation
78.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 19.50 weighted points
Original evidence +78.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +78.0; Money-gated reading -46.0 × 25% = -11.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, climate planning, biodiversity programmes and vast marine protection are major positives, while sea-level rise, reefs, waste and dispersed-island vulnerability remain severe.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
64.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 22.40 weighted points
Original evidence +64.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +64.0; Money-gated reading -50.3 × 35% = -17.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, climate planning, biodiversity programmes and vast marine protection are major positives, while sea-level rise, reefs, waste and dispersed-island vulnerability remain severe.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
28.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 7.00 weighted points
Original evidence +28.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +28.0; Money-gated reading -61.2 × 25% = -15.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, climate planning, biodiversity programmes and vast marine protection are major positives, while sea-level rise, reefs, waste and dispersed-island vulnerability remain severe.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
68.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 10.20 weighted points
Original evidence +68.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +68.0; Money-gated reading -49.1 × 15% = -7.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, climate planning, biodiversity programmes and vast marine protection are major positives, while sea-level rise, reefs, waste and dispersed-island vulnerability remain severe.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +59.1. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +59.1. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -51.8.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 19.50 + 22.40 + 7.00 + 10.20 = 59.10
Base: 59.10 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +59.1 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 59.10 × (6.00 × 92.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 3.56 points
For French Polynesia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 92% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.52%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +14.0
What the evidence found
For French Polynesia, climate planning, biodiversity programmes and vast marine protection are major positives, while sea-level rise, reefs, waste and dispersed-island vulnerability remain severe.
ISPF / Government of French Polynesia
5% weight
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
What this category measures
Physical safety, usable justice, legal identity, reliable public administration and low needless institutional burden.
TBFC targetUsable justice, legal identity, safety and ordinary administration should remain accessible regardless of wealth. Access-gate research questionDo fees, legal costs, bail, fines, documentation costs or ability to hire expertise materially change access to justice, safety or public administration? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Pacorips Constitutional Foundations
-55.0↓Money-gated · Evidence +48.5
Money-gated · Evidence +48.5
Score breakdown
Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
Exact point calculation
70.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Original evidence +70.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +70.0; Money-gated reading -48.5 × 25% = -12.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, institutions are stable and capable, while administrative complexity, land-title issues and geographic distance create friction.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
55.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 19.25 weighted points
Original evidence +55.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +55.0; Money-gated reading -53.0 × 35% = -18.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, institutions are stable and capable, while administrative complexity, land-title issues and geographic distance create friction.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
18.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 4.50 weighted points
Original evidence +18.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +18.0; Money-gated reading -64.2 × 25% = -16.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, institutions are stable and capable, while administrative complexity, land-title issues and geographic distance create friction.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
48.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.20 weighted points
Original evidence +48.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +48.0; Money-gated reading -55.1 × 15% = -8.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, institutions are stable and capable, while administrative complexity, land-title issues and geographic distance create friction.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +48.5. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +48.5. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -55.0.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 17.50 + 19.25 + 4.50 + 7.20 = 48.45
Base: 48.45 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +48.5 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 48.45 × (5.00 × 92.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 2.44 points
For French Polynesia, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 92% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.60%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +15.0
What the evidence found
For French Polynesia, institutions are stable and capable, while administrative complexity, land-title issues and geographic distance create friction.
ISPF / Government of French Polynesia
4% weight
Durability, Repair & Material Return
What this category measures
Whether useful materials, infrastructure and goods are maintained, repaired, recovered and cycled instead of becoming waste; documented harmful acceptance of imported garbage or disguised low-utility dumping is deducted.
TBFC targetRepair, maintenance and useful material circulation should protect capability instead of forcing repeated repurchase as the default route to continued use. Access-gate research questionDo repair and maintenance remain practically accessible, or do pricing, proprietary restrictions and replacement incentives turn continued use into repeated purchasing? Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Repair Is Sovereignty
-59.8↓Money-gated · Evidence +32.8
Money-gated · Evidence +32.8
Score breakdown
Durability, Repair & Material Return
Exact point calculation
56.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 14.00 weighted points
Original evidence +56.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +56.0; Money-gated reading -52.7 × 25% = -13.2 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, repair culture exists, but imported parts/materials and inter-island shipping make maintenance expensive and slow.
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate
This score follows the earlier continuous Reach scale. The original reading is retained without rounding or changing its historical position.
Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.
The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.
Exact point calculation
38.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 13.30 weighted points
Original evidence +38.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +38.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, repair culture exists, but imported parts/materials and inter-island shipping make maintenance expensive and slow.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
-2.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -0.50 weighted points
Original evidence -2.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -2.0; Money-gated reading -70.3 × 25% = -17.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, repair culture exists, but imported parts/materials and inter-island shipping make maintenance expensive and slow.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
40.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 6.00 weighted points
Original evidence +40.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +40.0; Money-gated reading -57.6 × 15% = -8.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, repair culture exists, but imported parts/materials and inter-island shipping make maintenance expensive and slow.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +32.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +32.8. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -59.8.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 14.00 + 13.30 + -0.50 + 6.00 = 32.80
Base: 32.80 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +32.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 32.80 × (4.00 × 92.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 1.32 points
Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions
A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.
No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.
For French Polynesia, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 92% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 3.68%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
Abundance Gap: +18.0
What the evidence found
For French Polynesia, repair culture exists, but imported parts/materials and inter-island shipping make maintenance expensive and slow.
ISPF / Government of French Polynesia
6% weight
International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
What this category measures
How easily visitors, migrants, refugees and neighbouring families can enter, remain, regularize status, prevent statelessness, build family continuity and participate in ordinary civic and economic life.
TBFC targetA country should have a humane vision for visitors, migrants, refugees and neighbouring families: practical entry, legal identity, family continuity, protection from statelessness, a route into ordinary life and a real place to contribute and grow with the society. Access-gate research questionWho can enter and stay, how wide is visa-free/eVisa/eTA reach, can newcomers regularize status and work, are refugees and children protected from statelessness, can families remain together, and does the country have a practical long-term vision for newcomers to join ordinary life and contribute? International scoring method
Welcome research checks practical entry breadth, visa-free/eVisa/eTA reach, lawful passport or citizenship pathways available to foreigners, birthright citizenship and statelessness prevention, parent/child family-status continuity, refugee recognition, migrant regularization, work/school/health access, family reunion and a credible national vision for newcomers to settle, contribute and grow with society.
A verified eVisa program open to more than 100 nationalities is recorded as a positive factual Welcome finding (the historical +5 scoring rule is retired). Researchers must verify the eligible-nationality breadth, not merely the existence of an online visa form. A lawful international citizenship/passport route available to qualifying foreigners is recorded as a Welcome access finding. The score must distinguish a usable transparent route from an expensive, narrow or highly discretionary program. Broad birthright citizenship, conditional territorial citizenship and statelessness safeguards are recorded with their precise legal eligibility and practical results. A system that leaves children without effective nationality, identity or durable status is a serious negative. A practical route that lets parents secure residence or citizenship through a child born in the country is documented for family-continuity review; long limbo, family separation or rules that strand the child between statuses reduce the score.
Refugee and migrant welcome is judged by lived access as well as admission: recognition, non-refoulement, legal documents, work, education, health care, family continuity, regularization, permanence and citizenship pathways all matter. Forced removal, refoulement, arbitrary detention, family separation and especially deporting or transferring people to unrelated third countries without a genuine durable-protection connection are negative Welcome evidence. Welcome is stronger when the country has a coherent plan for land, housing, work, contribution, family life and civic integration so newcomers are absorbed as people who can help the country grow, rather than warehoused indefinitely in camps or temporary limbo.
Read the Trott Bailey Family work: Refugee Living Should Be Glamorous, Purposeful and Liberating
-59.2↓Money-gated · Evidence +34.7
Money-gated · Evidence +34.7
International score breakdown
International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
Exact point calculation
46.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 11.50 weighted points
Original evidence +46.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +46.0; Money-gated reading -55.7 × 25% = -13.9 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Special French Polynesian residence rules permit EU access more easily but require long-stay visas/status for many non-EU migrants and proof of resources/insurance, so welcome remains financially and administratively conditional.
Exact point calculation
42.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 12.60 weighted points
Original evidence +42.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +42.0; Money-gated reading -57.0 × 30% = -17.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Special French Polynesian residence rules permit EU access more easily but require long-stay visas/status for many non-EU migrants and proof of resources/insurance, so welcome remains financially and administratively conditional.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
12.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 3.00 weighted points
Original evidence +12.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +12.0; Money-gated reading -66.1 × 25% = -16.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Special French Polynesian residence rules permit EU access more easily but require long-stay visas/status for many non-EU migrants and proof of resources/insurance, so welcome remains financially and administratively conditional.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
38.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 7.60 weighted points
Original evidence +38.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +38.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 20% = -11.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
Special French Polynesian residence rules permit EU access more easily but require long-stay visas/status for many non-EU migrants and proof of resources/insurance, so welcome remains financially and administratively conditional.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +34.7. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +34.7. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -59.2.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 11.50 + 12.60 + 3.00 + 7.60 = 34.70
Base: 34.70 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +34.7 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 34.70 × (6.00 × 88.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 2.00 points
For French Polynesia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 88% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.28%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
What the evidence found
Special French Polynesian residence rules permit EU access more easily but require long-stay visas/status for many non-EU migrants and proof of resources/insurance, so welcome remains financially and administratively conditional.
ISPF / Government of French Polynesia
6% weight
External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
What this category measures
Documented effects of a country beyond its borders: beneficial contribution, mutuality, external harm, extraction, repair, and verified deductions for exported garbage, waste or disguised low-utility dumping.
TBFC targetA civilization should increase useful local capability beyond its borders through medicine, training, disaster help, technical cooperation, peace-building and other mutually useful contribution, while avoiding extraction, exported harm and displacement. Access-gate research questionDo the country’s actions abroad increase health, skill, safety, resilience and locally retained capability, or do they export extraction, coercion, environmental harm, displacement, debt or other burdens? International scoring method
Legacy method: External Footprint documents independently verified beneficial action beyond the border, including medical missions, public-health help, scholarships, training, technical cooperation, disaster relief, humanitarian logistics, peacekeeping and other programs that leave useful capability with the receiving society. It also documents extractive conduct, exported environmental or human harm, coercive external security practices, abusive displacement outsourcing and whether documented harm is repaired, with a separately scored 6% category once four evidence-backed rails have been reviewed. Verified waste exports and disguised low-utility dumping are penalized through the transboundary harm ledger, as are irresponsible import acceptance practices through Domestic Durability & Material Return.
International contribution is investigated relative to capacity and quality, not raw size alone; documented outward activity is distinguished from independent benefit and local mutuality.
Dumping and harmful material transfers
Waste or disguised low-utility exports reduce External Footprint. Real reuse must be distinguished from disguised disposal. The sender retains responsibility for harms shifted abroad. Method v3: harmful imported garbage and low-utility dumping belong in External Footprint, where inbound transfer responsibility is 15% of the category. Historical method v2 import deductions remain archived under Domestic Durability until that country receives a sourced v3 score. Do not double-count.
Read the Trott Bailey Family work: When Another Nation Cleans Up Your Garbage
-51.9↓Money-gated · Evidence +58.8
Money-gated · Evidence +58.8
International score breakdown
External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
Exact point calculation
62.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 15.50 weighted points
Original evidence +62.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +62.0; Money-gated reading -50.9 × 25% = -12.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, large marine-protection expansion and Polynesian climate diplomacy are strong positives relative to capacity, while aviation, tourism, imported consumption and the legacy of French nuclear testing remain important negative external-history evidence.
Exact point calculation
66.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 16.50 weighted points
Original evidence +66.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +66.0; Money-gated reading -49.7 × 25% = -12.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, large marine-protection expansion and Polynesian climate diplomacy are strong positives relative to capacity, while aviation, tourism, imported consumption and the legacy of French nuclear testing remain important negative external-history evidence.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points
Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -54.5 × 35% = -19.1 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, large marine-protection expansion and Polynesian climate diplomacy are strong positives relative to capacity, while aviation, tourism, imported consumption and the legacy of French nuclear testing remain important negative external-history evidence.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
Exact point calculation
62.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 9.30 weighted points
Original evidence +62.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +62.0; Money-gated reading -50.9 × 15% = -7.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.
Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.
Why this score
For French Polynesia, large marine-protection expansion and Polynesian climate diplomacy are strong positives relative to capacity, while aviation, tourism, imported consumption and the legacy of French nuclear testing remain important negative external-history evidence.
This reviewed profile predates beleshky-by-beleshky provenance. The category evidence supporting this judgment is shown here; the sources may apply across multiple beleshkies.
The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.
Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic
Original weighted evidence: +58.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +58.8. Money Gate ceiling: -39.4. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -51.9.
The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.
Show the full category score calculation
Weighted rails: 15.50 + 16.50 + 17.50 + 9.30 = 58.80
Base: 58.80 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +58.8 (clamped to −100..+100)
Contribution to national evidence: 58.80 × (6.00 × 88.00%) ÷ 91.52 = 3.39 points
Cross-border waste and low-utility goods deductions
A country sending harmful material abroad and a country allowing it onto its land are assessed separately. Beneficial second-hand reuse is not automatically dumping. A pending audit is not a zero-harm finding.
No independently supported deduction or trade-flow screening is available for this country. This audit has not yet been researched.
For French Polynesia, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 88% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.28%. After normalization across French Polynesia’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.4 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.
What the evidence found
For French Polynesia, large marine-protection expansion and Polynesian climate diplomacy are strong positives relative to capacity, while aviation, tourism, imported consumption and the legacy of French nuclear testing remain important negative external-history evidence.
ISPF / Government of French PolynesiaTrott Bailey Family Civilization Target
The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping
Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.
This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.
and then 
