Trott Bailey Family Abundance · Country Profile

Sweden 🇸🇪

Sweden currently ranks #53 of 243 on the World Wealthiest Country Abundance Scorecard, scoring -57.38. This country is money-gated (6.75/20: essential access still faces payment or service barriers), strongest in Education and weakest in Family across 16 evidence categories.

Ranked by the Trott Bailey Family — the world’s wealthiest family in Abundance. Wealth means access to life and the ability to live it, not GDP or money.

Country profile & diagnostic reading

Tracking baselineEvidence through 21 Oct 2026
TBF Abundance Score
-57.4
How the headline score is calculated

Every category retains four original evidence beleshkies. The existing category adjustments are allocated among those beleshkies, within their scoring limits. Each adjusted beleshky receives the national Money Gate conversion, and four weighted gated contributions form its category result. The category results then form the national headline score, with historic two-decimal evidence rounding retained. Friction is not deducted twice.

Current evidence: +27.5 · Money Gate: 6.75/20 · Headline: -57.4.

The fully detailed gate formula is explained in the Money Gate method; no international score can independently clear it.

TBF Rank

#53of 243

Global standing based on life reachability

243 ranked · 0 published awaiting scores · 0 awaiting research · 243 directory entries

SwedenLast recorded move: down from #52 to #53.Recent recorded movements
  1. #52 → #5323 Oct 2026 · 19:04 GMT-0500
  2. #3 → #5222 Oct 2026 · 20:33 GMT-0500
  3. #2 → #320 Oct 2026 · 19:52 GMT-0500
  4. #3 → #220 Oct 2026 · 08:33 GMT-0500
View detailed rank & score history ↗

Research Coverage

100%
Coverage calculation

Sum of each published category weight × its documented scoring coverage ÷ 100. The percentage measures completed scoring slots, not independent verification of every claim. For the current country:

9.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 9.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 7.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 8.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 5.0 × 100.0% + 4.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% + 6.0 × 100.0% = 100.00% weighted coverage

Completion coverage is not evidence certainty. Every evaluated rail may use directly observed evidence, relevant proxies, or transparently labeled extrapolation. A score is not a measured population percentage merely because its source is verified.

Unreviewed international categories do not receive fabricated coverage or zero scores.

14 / 14 domestic categories scored · 2 / 2 international categories scored

GDP and money rank

#25

GDP and money are context, not the World Wealthiest Country Abundance ranking

Money Gate · Overall Gate 0.7.0

Five basics stand between this country and zero

1.3 / 4

Food

Why 1.3 / 4?

Credit only for verified zero-money/targeted food routes; ordinary food purchase dependence remains.

Point calculation

1.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 31.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
0.8 / 4

Housing / Land

Why 0.8 / 4?

Credit only for verified public/non-market housing or land support; ordinary shelter/land remains rent, mortgage or purchase gated.

Point calculation

0.75 ÷ 4 × 100 = 18.75% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
2.8 / 4

Healthcare

Why 2.8 / 4?

Credit reflects public/subsidized care reach while preserving premiums, fees, copays, waiting or status gates.

Point calculation

2.75 ÷ 4 × 100 = 68.75% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
0.8 / 4

Transportation

Why 0.8 / 4?

Credit reflects verified free/discount public mobility where available; ordinary mobility remains fare, fuel or vehicle gated.

Point calculation

0.75 ÷ 4 × 100 = 18.75% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
1.3 / 4

Water / Energy

Why 1.3 / 4?

Credit reflects public/social utility support and high service reach; recurring water/energy payment remains.

Point calculation

1.25 ÷ 4 × 100 = 31.25% of this Money Gate rail. Five rails together can earn 20/20.

Points are assigned from the verified no-payment access rubric and actual national reach, not from the percentage alone.

Individual source linkage for this historical five-gate review is incomplete. These links were archived as a shared set, not checked individually for this gate.

Shared sources (gate linkage incomplete)
Gate finding reviewed 2026-10-06
Money Gate score
  • Food1.3 / 4
  • Housing / Land0.8 / 4
  • Healthcare2.8 / 4
  • Transportation0.8 / 4
  • Water / Energy1.3 / 4
  • Money still needed13.3 / 20

Grey means points not yet earned toward fully money-free basic life—not a cash price or currency sum.

Why 6.8 / 20?

The Money Gate total is the sum of the five direct 0–4 readings. Every basic need remains visible separately so one strong area cannot hide another weak one.

Actual calculation

Food 1.25 + Housing / Land 0.75 + Healthcare 2.75 + Transportation 0.75 + Water / Energy 1.25 = 6.75 / 20

A country remains money-gated until the total reaches 20 / 20.

Friction Economy Pressure
50.1 / 100
Why 50.1 / 100?

Friction is visible as its own 0–100 contextual reading from domestic category rails. Its effect is already in the evidence score and is not applied to the ceiling again.

Actual calculation

(100 - -0.28) ÷ 2 = 50.14 / 100

The weighted Friction rail comes from the published domestic category rails.

Money-gated ceiling
-33.1
Why -33.1?

Each Money Gate point raises the negative ceiling by 2.5 points: 0/20 → −50, 7/20 → −32.5, 10/20 → −25, 19.5/20 → −1.25. At 20/20 the gate is removed, so the evidence score becomes the headline directly.

Actual calculation

-50 + 2.5 × 6.75 = -33.1

16-category profile

All categories at a glance

All sixteen categories use the −100 to +100 evidence scale. International Welcome and External Footprint are assessed alongside the domestic categories. Select a category to examine the scoring and evidence.

Chart view

Default view shows how each category is compressed by the current Money Gate. Switch to preview the same category evidence if the gate were lifted.

Category readings & evidence

Open any category for the full diagnostic reading

9% weight Human Time & Burden Return
-58.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +25.0

Score breakdown

Human Time & Burden Return

-58.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.8× 25%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 12.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -49.8 × 25% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Capacity: Essential services and income-replacement supports exist, but not authored Shubaka-style time-saving compound integration. Category context: Statistics Sweden labour force and parental benefit records establish real leave and working-time supports, but no nationwide money-free family-time system; earning, care and travel burdens remain.

For Sweden, paid-work burden is moderated by strong services, but housing queues, care waits and recurring household costs still consume family time.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 35%= -20.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

25.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach: Most have modern household services, but full money-free access to essential relief is not evidenced. Category context: Statistics Sweden labour force and parental benefit records establish real leave and working-time supports, but no nationwide money-free family-time system; earning, care and travel burdens remain.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-66.6× 25%= -16.6 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -66.6 × 25% = -16.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Friction: Care work, paid work, household bills and travel remain mandatory burdens. Category context: Statistics Sweden labour force and parental benefit records establish real leave and working-time supports, but no nationwide money-free family-time system; earning, care and travel burdens remain.

Statistics Sweden reports Q4 2025 actual average 31.7 paid-work hours per employed person, affected by holidays and leave, not usual schedule. Statistics Sweden time-use research still records unequal unpaid chores.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 15%= -8.7 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 15% = -8.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Return / Regeneration: Parent leave is a genuine time return, though not lifelong free co-contribution. Category context: Statistics Sweden labour force and parental benefit records establish real leave and working-time supports, but no nationwide money-free family-time system; earning, care and travel burdens remain.

Statistics Sweden reports Q4 2025 actual average 31.7 paid-work hours per employed person, affected by holidays and leave, not usual schedule. Statistics Sweden time-use research still records unequal unpaid chores.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.46 + -20.37 + -16.64 + -8.74 = -58.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +25.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +25.0. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+25.0 Original evidence category score+25.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 12.50 + 8.75 + 0.00 + 3.75 = 25.00

Base: 25.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +25.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 25.00 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 2.25 points

For Sweden, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | human-time-burden | beleshky 4

Return / Regeneration: Parent leave is a genuine time return, though not lifelong free co-contribution. Category context: Statistics Sweden labour force and parental benefit records establish real leave and working-time supports, but no nationwide money-free family-time system; earning, care and travel burdens remain.

2026-10-22 Statistics Sweden; Swedish Social Insurance Agency
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | human-time-burden | beleshky 3

Friction: Care work, paid work, household bills and travel remain mandatory burdens. Category context: Statistics Sweden labour force and parental benefit records establish real leave and working-time supports, but no nationwide money-free family-time system; earning, care and travel burdens remain.

2026-10-22 Statistics Sweden; Swedish Social Insurance Agency
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | human-time-burden | beleshky 2

Reach: Most have modern household services, but full money-free access to essential relief is not evidenced. Category context: Statistics Sweden labour force and parental benefit records establish real leave and working-time supports, but no nationwide money-free family-time system; earning, care and travel burdens remain.

2026-10-22 Statistics Sweden; Swedish Social Insurance Agency
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | human-time-burden | beleshky 1

Capacity: Essential services and income-replacement supports exist, but not authored Shubaka-style time-saving compound integration. Category context: Statistics Sweden labour force and parental benefit records establish real leave and working-time supports, but no nationwide money-free family-time system; earning, care and travel burdens remain.

2026-10-22 Statistics Sweden; Swedish Social Insurance Agency
Family Time 3.1 | Sweden | usable family time +62

Statistics Sweden reports Q4 2025 actual average 31.7 paid-work hours per employed person, affected by holidays and leave, not usual schedule. Statistics Sweden time-use research still records unequal unpaid chores.

2025-12-31 Statistics Sweden Q4 2025 and Women and Men 2024
Family Time 3.1 | Sweden | work-friction +55

Statistics Sweden reports Q4 2025 actual average 31.7 paid-work hours per employed person, affected by holidays and leave, not usual schedule. Statistics Sweden time-use research still records unequal unpaid chores.

2025-12-31 Statistics Sweden Q4 2025 and Women and Men 2024
8% weight Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach
-60.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +18.8

Score breakdown

Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

-60.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Housing Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.8× 25%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 12.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -49.8 × 25% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Sweden, capacity: Existing housing construction and repair capacity is substantial, but the shortage is documented. Category context: Boverket 2026: 57% of residents live in municipalities reporting housing undersupply, while 130 municipalities report balance. Homes remain rent/purchase/credit gated.

For Sweden, housing capacity is extensive, yet more than half the population lives in municipalities reporting undersupply; metropolitan queues and prices remain a major gate.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Housing Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 35%= -20.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.75/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

25.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Sweden, reach: Most have adequate shelter, but free suitable home entry is uncommon. Category context: Boverket 2026: 57% of residents live in municipalities reporting housing undersupply, while 130 municipalities report balance. Homes remain rent/purchase/credit gated.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Housing Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-74.9× 25%= -18.7 points
Exact point calculation

-25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.25 weighted points

Original evidence -25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -25.0; Money-gated reading -74.9 × 25% = -18.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, friction: Rent, debt and queues remain material practical barriers. Category context: Boverket 2026: 57% of residents live in municipalities reporting housing undersupply, while 130 municipalities report balance. Homes remain rent/purchase/credit gated.

🤔
Return / Durability 15%
See all nine Housing Return / Durability scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 15%= -8.7 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 15% = -8.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, return / Durability: Long-lasting homes are possible; adaptation and repair remain payment dependent. Category context: Boverket 2026: 57% of residents live in municipalities reporting housing undersupply, while 130 municipalities report balance. Homes remain rent/purchase/credit gated.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.46 + -20.37 + -18.73 + -8.74 = -60.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +18.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +18.8. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -60.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+18.8 Original evidence category score+18.8 Contribution to national evidence score+1.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 12.50 + 8.75 + -6.25 + 3.75 = 18.75

Base: 18.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +18.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 18.75 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.50 points

For Sweden, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | housing-shelter-reach | beleshky 4

For Sweden, return / Durability: Long-lasting homes are possible; adaptation and repair remain payment dependent. Category context: Boverket 2026: 57% of residents live in municipalities reporting housing undersupply, while 130 municipalities report balance. Homes remain rent/purchase/credit gated.

2026-10-22 Boverket Housing Market Survey 2026
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | housing-shelter-reach | beleshky 3

For Sweden, friction: Rent, debt and queues remain material practical barriers. Category context: Boverket 2026: 57% of residents live in municipalities reporting housing undersupply, while 130 municipalities report balance. Homes remain rent/purchase/credit gated.

2026-10-22 Boverket Housing Market Survey 2026
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | housing-shelter-reach | beleshky 2

For Sweden, reach: Most have adequate shelter, but free suitable home entry is uncommon. Category context: Boverket 2026: 57% of residents live in municipalities reporting housing undersupply, while 130 municipalities report balance. Homes remain rent/purchase/credit gated.

2026-10-22 Boverket Housing Market Survey 2026
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | housing-shelter-reach | beleshky 1

For Sweden, capacity: Existing housing construction and repair capacity is substantial, but the shortage is documented. Category context: Boverket 2026: 57% of residents live in municipalities reporting housing undersupply, while 130 municipalities report balance. Homes remain rent/purchase/credit gated.

2026-10-22 Boverket Housing Market Survey 2026
Housing, Shelter & Housing Reach

For Sweden, housing capacity is extensive, yet more than half the population lives in municipalities reporting undersupply; metropolitan queues and prices remain a major gate.

Boverket — Housing Market Survey 2026
9% weight Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance
-56.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +31.3

Score breakdown

Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

-56.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Food Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-41.5× 25%= -10.4 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -41.5 × 25% = -10.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Sweden, capacity: Food production/import and safety capacity are substantial. Category context: Compulsory-school pupils receive a nutritious free school meal; ordinary household food continues through paid shopping, and school meals do not meet a five-person household whole-food free-access test.

For Sweden, compulsory-school meals are a genuine nationwide zero-money food route for children; ordinary household food remains purchased.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Food Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 35%= -20.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Food 1.25/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

25.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Sweden, reach: Free school lunch is a real partial route, not fully free food for all ages. Category context: Compulsory-school pupils receive a nutritious free school meal; ordinary household food continues through paid shopping, and school meals do not meet a five-person household whole-food free-access test.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Food Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-66.6× 25%= -16.6 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -66.6 × 25% = -16.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, friction / Waste: Food is bought; edible landscapes and no-waste distribution are not a nationwide baseline. Category context: Compulsory-school pupils receive a nutritious free school meal; ordinary household food continues through paid shopping, and school meals do not meet a five-person household whole-food free-access test.

🤔
Return / Multiplication 15%
See all nine Food Return / Multiplication scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 15%= -8.7 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 15% = -8.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, return / Multiplication: Food supply is sustained but routine multiplication and no-payment family distribution are not shown. Category context: Compulsory-school pupils receive a nutritious free school meal; ordinary household food continues through paid shopping, and school meals do not meet a five-person household whole-food free-access test.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.37 + -20.37 + -16.64 + -8.74 = -56.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +31.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +31.3. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -56.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+31.3 Original evidence category score+31.3 Contribution to national evidence score+2.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 8.75 + 0.00 + 3.75 = 31.25

Base: 31.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +31.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 31.25 × (9.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 2.81 points

For Sweden, this category carries 9% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 9.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +50.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | food-nourishment-free-food | beleshky 4

For Sweden, return / Multiplication: Food supply is sustained but routine multiplication and no-payment family distribution are not shown. Category context: Compulsory-school pupils receive a nutritious free school meal; ordinary household food continues through paid shopping, and school meals do not meet a five-person household whole-food free-access test.

2026-10-22 Swedish Government Child Guarantee
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | food-nourishment-free-food | beleshky 3

For Sweden, friction / Waste: Food is bought; edible landscapes and no-waste distribution are not a nationwide baseline. Category context: Compulsory-school pupils receive a nutritious free school meal; ordinary household food continues through paid shopping, and school meals do not meet a five-person household whole-food free-access test.

2026-10-22 Swedish Government Child Guarantee
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | food-nourishment-free-food | beleshky 2

For Sweden, reach: Free school lunch is a real partial route, not fully free food for all ages. Category context: Compulsory-school pupils receive a nutritious free school meal; ordinary household food continues through paid shopping, and school meals do not meet a five-person household whole-food free-access test.

2026-10-22 Swedish Government Child Guarantee
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | food-nourishment-free-food | beleshky 1

For Sweden, capacity: Food production/import and safety capacity are substantial. Category context: Compulsory-school pupils receive a nutritious free school meal; ordinary household food continues through paid shopping, and school meals do not meet a five-person household whole-food free-access test.

2026-10-22 Swedish Government Child Guarantee
Food, Nourishment & Free Food Abundance

For Sweden, compulsory-school meals are a genuine nationwide zero-money food route for children; ordinary household food remains purchased.

Boverket — Housing Market Survey 2026
6% weight Water & Sanitation Abundance
-54.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +35.0

Score breakdown

Water & Sanitation Abundance

-54.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-41.5× 25%= -10.4 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -41.5 × 25% = -10.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Sweden, capacity: Strong public supply, wastewater plants and maintenance exist. Category context: OECD records 97% EU-compliant urban wastewater treatment and extensive systems; Svenskt Vatten reports paid municipal water/sewer charges averaging SEK 1,046 monthly for a household in 2026.

For Sweden, mature municipal water/sewer infrastructure is broad, but 2026 tariffs average roughly SEK 12,549/year for a typical detached-house household and vary sharply by municipality.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 35%= -20.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 1.25/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

25.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Sweden, reach: Services reach most homes; full free drinking water and sanitation do not. Category context: OECD records 97% EU-compliant urban wastewater treatment and extensive systems; Svenskt Vatten reports paid municipal water/sewer charges averaging SEK 1,046 monthly for a household in 2026.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Friction / Loss scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-66.6× 25%= -16.6 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -66.6 × 25% = -16.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, friction / Loss: Municipal water bills and household/private system disparities persist. Category context: OECD records 97% EU-compliant urban wastewater treatment and extensive systems; Svenskt Vatten reports paid municipal water/sewer charges averaging SEK 1,046 monthly for a household in 2026.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Water & Sanitation Return / Regeneration scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.8× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -49.8 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, return / Regeneration: Measured wastewater treatment and ecological source protection earn return credit, not proof of free household access. Category context: OECD records 97% EU-compliant urban wastewater treatment and extensive systems; Svenskt Vatten reports paid municipal water/sewer charges averaging SEK 1,046 monthly for a household in 2026.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.37 + -20.37 + -16.64 + -7.48 = -54.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +35.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -54.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+35.0 Original evidence category score+35.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.1
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 8.75 + 0.00 + 7.50 = 35.00

Base: 35.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 35.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 2.10 points

For Sweden, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.1 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +50.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | water-sanitation | beleshky 4

For Sweden, return / Regeneration: Measured wastewater treatment and ecological source protection earn return credit, not proof of free household access. Category context: OECD records 97% EU-compliant urban wastewater treatment and extensive systems; Svenskt Vatten reports paid municipal water/sewer charges averaging SEK 1,046 monthly for a household in 2026.

2026-10-22 OECD Sweden environmental review; Svenskt Vatten
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | water-sanitation | beleshky 3

For Sweden, friction / Loss: Municipal water bills and household/private system disparities persist. Category context: OECD records 97% EU-compliant urban wastewater treatment and extensive systems; Svenskt Vatten reports paid municipal water/sewer charges averaging SEK 1,046 monthly for a household in 2026.

2026-10-22 OECD Sweden environmental review; Svenskt Vatten
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | water-sanitation | beleshky 2

For Sweden, reach: Services reach most homes; full free drinking water and sanitation do not. Category context: OECD records 97% EU-compliant urban wastewater treatment and extensive systems; Svenskt Vatten reports paid municipal water/sewer charges averaging SEK 1,046 monthly for a household in 2026.

2026-10-22 OECD Sweden environmental review; Svenskt Vatten
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | water-sanitation | beleshky 1

For Sweden, capacity: Strong public supply, wastewater plants and maintenance exist. Category context: OECD records 97% EU-compliant urban wastewater treatment and extensive systems; Svenskt Vatten reports paid municipal water/sewer charges averaging SEK 1,046 monthly for a household in 2026.

2026-10-22 OECD Sweden environmental review; Svenskt Vatten
Water & Sanitation Abundance

For Sweden, mature municipal water/sewer infrastructure is broad, but 2026 tariffs average roughly SEK 12,549/year for a typical detached-house household and vary sharply by municipality.

Svenskt Vatten — VA tariffs 2026
5% weight Energy & Household Capability
-54.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +35.0

Score breakdown

Energy & Household Capability

-54.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Energy Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-41.5× 25%= -10.4 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -41.5 × 25% = -10.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Sweden, capacity: Broad dependable electricity and clean household energy capacity. Category context: The OECD documents a relatively low-fossil energy mix and strong supply; essential energy is still billed, and broad no-payment household energy reach is not established.

For Sweden, electricity reach is excellent, while network/energy charges and emerging capacity tariffs preserve a recurring cash gate.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Energy Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 35%= -20.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Water / Energy 1.25/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

Water and energy share one combined four-point gate; the direct audit must show which part reaches families without payment.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

25.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Sweden, reach: Nearly universal household power access, but meaningful no-pay service is not evidenced. Category context: The OECD documents a relatively low-fossil energy mix and strong supply; essential energy is still billed, and broad no-payment household energy reach is not established.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Energy Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-66.6× 25%= -16.6 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -66.6 × 25% = -16.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, friction: Bills and tariffs are still prerequisites, with changing grid charges. Category context: The OECD documents a relatively low-fossil energy mix and strong supply; essential energy is still billed, and broad no-payment household energy reach is not established.

🤔
Return / Burden Removed 15%
See all nine Energy Return / Burden Removed scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.8× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -49.8 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, return / Burden Removed: Reliable cooking, refrigeration and public energy supply reduce work. Category context: The OECD documents a relatively low-fossil energy mix and strong supply; essential energy is still billed, and broad no-payment household energy reach is not established.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.37 + -20.37 + -16.64 + -7.48 = -54.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +35.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -54.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+35.0 Original evidence category score+35.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.8
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 8.75 + 0.00 + 7.50 = 35.00

Base: 35.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 35.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.75 points

For Sweden, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.8 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +50.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | energy-household-capability | beleshky 4

For Sweden, return / Burden Removed: Reliable cooking, refrigeration and public energy supply reduce work. Category context: The OECD documents a relatively low-fossil energy mix and strong supply; essential energy is still billed, and broad no-payment household energy reach is not established.

2026-10-22 OECD Environment at a Glance Sweden
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | energy-household-capability | beleshky 3

For Sweden, friction: Bills and tariffs are still prerequisites, with changing grid charges. Category context: The OECD documents a relatively low-fossil energy mix and strong supply; essential energy is still billed, and broad no-payment household energy reach is not established.

2026-10-22 OECD Environment at a Glance Sweden
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | energy-household-capability | beleshky 2

For Sweden, reach: Nearly universal household power access, but meaningful no-pay service is not evidenced. Category context: The OECD documents a relatively low-fossil energy mix and strong supply; essential energy is still billed, and broad no-payment household energy reach is not established.

2026-10-22 OECD Environment at a Glance Sweden
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | energy-household-capability | beleshky 1

For Sweden, capacity: Broad dependable electricity and clean household energy capacity. Category context: The OECD documents a relatively low-fossil energy mix and strong supply; essential energy is still billed, and broad no-payment household energy reach is not established.

2026-10-22 OECD Environment at a Glance Sweden
Energy & Household Capability

For Sweden, electricity reach is excellent, while network/energy charges and emerging capacity tariffs preserve a recurring cash gate.

Energy Markets Inspectorate
7% weight Health & Care Reach
-54.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +35.0

Score breakdown

Health & Care Reach

-54.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Health & Care Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-41.5× 25%= -10.4 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -41.5 × 25% = -10.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Sweden, capacity: Well-staffed public system, preventive services and specialist referral. Category context: OECD 2025 reports core-service coverage for all, 2.3% self-reported unmet need and 86% mandatory-prepayment coverage of spending; surgery waits and remaining out-of-pocket items block fully free complete reach.

For Sweden, universal public-care architecture and fee caps reduce exposure, but patient fees, medicines/dentistry and waits mean care is not fully zero-money.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Health & Care Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 35%= -20.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Healthcare 2.75/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

25.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Sweden, reach: Core coverage is universal; full zero-charge dentistry, medicines and specialist services are not. Category context: OECD 2025 reports core-service coverage for all, 2.3% self-reported unmet need and 86% mandatory-prepayment coverage of spending; surgery waits and remaining out-of-pocket items block fully free complete reach.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Health & Care Friction scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-66.6× 25%= -16.6 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -66.6 × 25% = -16.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, friction: Surgical waits and some patient costs remain. Category context: OECD 2025 reports core-service coverage for all, 2.3% self-reported unmet need and 86% mandatory-prepayment coverage of spending; surgery waits and remaining out-of-pocket items block fully free complete reach.

🤔
Return / Prevention 15%
See all nine Health & Care Return / Prevention scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.8× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -49.8 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, return / Prevention: High vaccination, screening and health outcomes yield durable benefit. Category context: OECD 2025 reports core-service coverage for all, 2.3% self-reported unmet need and 86% mandatory-prepayment coverage of spending; surgery waits and remaining out-of-pocket items block fully free complete reach.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.37 + -20.37 + -16.64 + -7.48 = -54.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +35.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +35.0. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -54.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+35.0 Original evidence category score+35.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 8.75 + 0.00 + 7.50 = 35.00

Base: 35.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +35.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 35.00 × (7.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 2.45 points

For Sweden, this category carries 7% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 7.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +50.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | health-care-reach | beleshky 4

For Sweden, return / Prevention: High vaccination, screening and health outcomes yield durable benefit. Category context: OECD 2025 reports core-service coverage for all, 2.3% self-reported unmet need and 86% mandatory-prepayment coverage of spending; surgery waits and remaining out-of-pocket items block fully free complete reach.

2026-10-22 OECD Health at a Glance 2025 Sweden
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | health-care-reach | beleshky 3

For Sweden, friction: Surgical waits and some patient costs remain. Category context: OECD 2025 reports core-service coverage for all, 2.3% self-reported unmet need and 86% mandatory-prepayment coverage of spending; surgery waits and remaining out-of-pocket items block fully free complete reach.

2026-10-22 OECD Health at a Glance 2025 Sweden
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | health-care-reach | beleshky 2

For Sweden, reach: Core coverage is universal; full zero-charge dentistry, medicines and specialist services are not. Category context: OECD 2025 reports core-service coverage for all, 2.3% self-reported unmet need and 86% mandatory-prepayment coverage of spending; surgery waits and remaining out-of-pocket items block fully free complete reach.

2026-10-22 OECD Health at a Glance 2025 Sweden
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | health-care-reach | beleshky 1

For Sweden, capacity: Well-staffed public system, preventive services and specialist referral. Category context: OECD 2025 reports core-service coverage for all, 2.3% self-reported unmet need and 86% mandatory-prepayment coverage of spending; surgery waits and remaining out-of-pocket items block fully free complete reach.

2026-10-22 OECD Health at a Glance 2025 Sweden
Health & Care Reach

For Sweden, universal public-care architecture and fee caps reduce exposure, but patient fees, medicines/dentistry and waits mean care is not fully zero-money.

Boverket — Housing Market Survey 2026
6% weight Education & Human Capability
-46.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +58.8

Score breakdown

Education & Human Capability

-46.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-41.5× 25%= -10.4 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -41.5 × 25% = -10.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Sweden, capacity: High attainment, institutions and many qualified educators. Category context: Basic education is publicly funded and broadly fee-free, with 97% continuing enrolment one year after lower secondary; OECD 2026 notes a 13.9% not-fully-qualified teacher rate and 17% programme noncompletion.

For Sweden, the statutory fee-free schooling principle and public financing create strong zero-money foundational education reach.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-41.5× 35%= -14.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

75.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 26.25 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -41.5 × 35% = -14.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Sweden, reach: Free compulsory schools and broad enrolment meet strong effective reach. Category context: Basic education is publicly funded and broadly fee-free, with 97% continuing enrolment one year after lower secondary; OECD 2026 notes a 13.9% not-fully-qualified teacher rate and 17% programme noncompletion.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 25%= -14.6 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 25% = -14.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, friction: Some qualifications gaps and support delays remain despite free pathways. Category context: Basic education is publicly funded and broadly fee-free, with 97% continuing enrolment one year after lower secondary; OECD 2026 notes a 13.9% not-fully-qualified teacher rate and 17% programme noncompletion.

🤔
Return / Capability 15%
See all nine Education & Human Capability Return / Capability levels and how to improve ↗
-49.8× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -49.8 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, return / Capability: Good educational attainment, with measurable completion and qualification gaps. Category context: Basic education is publicly funded and broadly fee-free, with 97% continuing enrolment one year after lower secondary; OECD 2026 notes a 13.9% not-fully-qualified teacher rate and 17% programme noncompletion.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.37 + -14.52 + -14.55 + -7.48 = -46.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +58.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +58.8. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -46.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+58.8 Original evidence category score+58.8 Contribution to national evidence score+3.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 26.25 + 6.25 + 7.50 = 58.75

Base: 58.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +58.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 58.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 3.53 points

For Sweden, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: 0.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | education-human-capability | beleshky 4

For Sweden, return / Capability: Good educational attainment, with measurable completion and qualification gaps. Category context: Basic education is publicly funded and broadly fee-free, with 97% continuing enrolment one year after lower secondary; OECD 2026 notes a 13.9% not-fully-qualified teacher rate and 17% programme noncompletion.

2026-10-22 OECD Education at a Glance 2026 Sweden
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | education-human-capability | beleshky 3

For Sweden, friction: Some qualifications gaps and support delays remain despite free pathways. Category context: Basic education is publicly funded and broadly fee-free, with 97% continuing enrolment one year after lower secondary; OECD 2026 notes a 13.9% not-fully-qualified teacher rate and 17% programme noncompletion.

2026-10-22 OECD Education at a Glance 2026 Sweden
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | education-human-capability | beleshky 2

For Sweden, reach: Free compulsory schools and broad enrolment meet strong effective reach. Category context: Basic education is publicly funded and broadly fee-free, with 97% continuing enrolment one year after lower secondary; OECD 2026 notes a 13.9% not-fully-qualified teacher rate and 17% programme noncompletion.

2026-10-22 OECD Education at a Glance 2026 Sweden
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | education-human-capability | beleshky 1

For Sweden, capacity: High attainment, institutions and many qualified educators. Category context: Basic education is publicly funded and broadly fee-free, with 97% continuing enrolment one year after lower secondary; OECD 2026 notes a 13.9% not-fully-qualified teacher rate and 17% programme noncompletion.

2026-10-22 OECD Education at a Glance 2026 Sweden
4% weight Mobility & Reachability
-58.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +25.0

Score breakdown

Mobility & Reachability

-58.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Capacity levels and how to improve ↗
-49.8× 25%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 12.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -49.8 × 25% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Sweden, capacity: Intercity and urban systems function, especially in population centres. Category context: Functional urban and regional public transit remains fare-based; Stockholm SL charges SEK 43 for a standard single ticket. National zero-fare travel coverage is not established.

For Sweden, safe and extensive public transport exists, but fares and geographic access mean ordinary mobility remains payment-dependent.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Reach levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 35%= -20.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Transportation 0.75/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

  1. -100No functioning ordinary transport service established
  2. -75Some transportation exists but practical access is severely limited
  3. -50Basic usable transportation infrastructure exists
  4. -25A functioning national or broadly connected public transport network exists
  5. 0More than 50% of residents are effectively served
  6. +25More than 75% effectively served OR more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  7. +50More than 75% effectively served AND more than 30% receive dependable free travel
  8. +75More than 90% effectively served, at least 75% travel free, and service is reliable
  9. +100Ordinary essential travel is universally accessible, reliable and free of payment
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Sweden, reach: Reliable transport in many areas; long-distance and ordinary rides remain fare-based. Category context: Functional urban and regional public transit remains fare-based; Stockholm SL charges SEK 43 for a standard single ticket. National zero-fare travel coverage is not established.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Friction levels and how to improve ↗
-66.6× 25%= -16.6 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -66.6 × 25% = -16.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, friction: Recurring fares, rural links and necessary interchanges impose burden. Category context: Functional urban and regional public transit remains fare-based; Stockholm SL charges SEK 43 for a standard single ticket. National zero-fare travel coverage is not established.

🤔
Return / Time 15%
See all nine Mobility & Reachability Return / Time levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 15%= -8.7 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 15% = -8.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, return / Time: Interlinked service returns time, but free travel and seamless family travel are not ordinary. Category context: Functional urban and regional public transit remains fare-based; Stockholm SL charges SEK 43 for a standard single ticket. National zero-fare travel coverage is not established.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.46 + -20.37 + -16.64 + -8.74 = -58.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +25.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +25.0. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+25.0 Original evidence category score+25.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 12.50 + 8.75 + 0.00 + 3.75 = 25.00

Base: 25.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +25.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 25.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.00 points

For Sweden, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | mobility-reachability | beleshky 4

For Sweden, return / Time: Interlinked service returns time, but free travel and seamless family travel are not ordinary. Category context: Functional urban and regional public transit remains fare-based; Stockholm SL charges SEK 43 for a standard single ticket. National zero-fare travel coverage is not established.

2026-10-22 Stockholm public transport SL tickets
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | mobility-reachability | beleshky 3

For Sweden, friction: Recurring fares, rural links and necessary interchanges impose burden. Category context: Functional urban and regional public transit remains fare-based; Stockholm SL charges SEK 43 for a standard single ticket. National zero-fare travel coverage is not established.

2026-10-22 Stockholm public transport SL tickets
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | mobility-reachability | beleshky 2

For Sweden, reach: Reliable transport in many areas; long-distance and ordinary rides remain fare-based. Category context: Functional urban and regional public transit remains fare-based; Stockholm SL charges SEK 43 for a standard single ticket. National zero-fare travel coverage is not established.

2026-10-22 Stockholm public transport SL tickets
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | mobility-reachability | beleshky 1

For Sweden, capacity: Intercity and urban systems function, especially in population centres. Category context: Functional urban and regional public transit remains fare-based; Stockholm SL charges SEK 43 for a standard single ticket. National zero-fare travel coverage is not established.

2026-10-22 Stockholm public transport SL tickets
8% weight Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability
-94.0↓

Money-gated · Evidence -82.1

Score breakdown

Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

-94.0Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Family Formation Capacity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-85.2× 25%= -21.3 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -55.6; Money-gated reading -85.2 × 25% = -21.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Sweden, capacity — family establishment & care: Existing maternity, childcare and paid family-leave institutions are strong. Category context: Parent benefit provides 480 paid days per child, but housing and paid essentials remain substantial burdens. SCB 2025 total fertility is 1.423; the authored 60% family-environment/40% fertility method is used.

For Sweden, strong family services coexist with housing/care cost pressures. The 2025 TFR of 1.42 is below replacement and far below the TBF 5.0 target. Observed TFR 1.420 (2025) is below replacement and below the TBF target of 5.0.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Family Formation Reach levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-93.5× 35%= -32.7 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -80.6; Money-gated reading -93.5 × 35% = -32.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Sweden, reach — actual family & child access: Many eligible parents receive support, but suitable housing and full free provision are incomplete. Category context: Parent benefit provides 480 paid days per child, but housing and paid essentials remain substantial burdens. SCB 2025 total fertility is 1.423; the authored 60% family-environment/40% fertility method is used.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Family Formation Friction levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-100.0× 25%= -25.0 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -100.0; Money-gated reading -100.0 × 25% = -25.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, friction — what makes family life difficult: Housing costs and family work burdens remain despite parental benefits. Category context: Parent benefit provides 480 paid days per child, but housing and paid essentials remain substantial burdens. SCB 2025 total fertility is 1.423; the authored 60% family-environment/40% fertility method is used.

🤔
Return / Continuity 15%
See all nine Family Formation Return / Continuity levels, the fertility overlay and how to improve ↗
-100.0× 15%= -15.0 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -100.0; Money-gated reading -100.0 × 15% = -15.0 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, return / Continuity — family life sustained: Family leave returns significant childcare time, but population fertility is below replacement. Category context: Parent benefit provides 480 paid days per child, but housing and paid essentials remain substantial burdens. SCB 2025 total fertility is 1.423; the authored 60% family-environment/40% fertility method is used.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -21.29 + -32.73 + -25.00 + -15.00 = -94.0

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +40.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): -122.1. Effective evidence: -82.1. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -94.0.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+40.0 Published family-method adjustment-22.1 TBF marriage-law policy deduction−50 Original evidence category score-32.1 Contribution to national evidence score-2.6
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 17.50 + 0.00 + 3.75 = 40.00

Base: 17.88 · reviewed adjustment: -22.12 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −50.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published -32.1 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: -32.12 × (8.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = -2.57 points

Why the family-method adjustment is applied

New and re-reviewed Family Formation scores blend 60% lived family conditions with 40% fertility performance. Five children per woman is the 100/100 fertility target. The 2.1 replacement floor earns +25/100 fertility performance; below replacement declines proportionally, while rates above 2.1 rise progressively toward +100 at 5.0. 2026-10-22 SWE methodology-led full score audit: Parent benefit provides 480 paid days per child, but housing and paid essentials remain substantial burdens. SCB 2025 total fertility is 1.423; the authored 60% family-environment/40% fertility method is used. All four authored anchors individually reviewed; official source describes facts, scoring is TBF judgment. Rail weights [25, 35, 25, 15]. Family: 60% living environment / 40% SCB 2025 TFR 1.423 under TBF fertility method. Direct Money Gate audited separately; this import does not duplicate five-gate points.

For Sweden, this category carries 8% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 8.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes -2.6 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Family Formation — two-part calculation and marriage-law criterion

First half — the established family and fertility assessment

The original family score remains available. It combines 60% conditions for family life with 40% observed total fertility performance. Its source research is preserved.

Pre-policy score: +17.9

Second half — binary marriage-law policy criterion

This is a Trott Bailey Family policy preference, not an estimate of births lost. Recognition: −50 points. Reviewed non-recognition: 0 deduction. An unreviewed status stays pending and causes no deduction.

Country legal status: Same-sex marriage legally recognized

Reported effective year: 2009

Deduction calculation: 50 × 1 = −50 points

Final category calculation: +17.9 − 50 = -32.1 (clamped to −100..+100, before any independent material-transfer deductions)

Nationwide same-sex marriage recognition recorded by Pew Research Center; this is a legal-status observation, not a measured fertility effect.

Legal-status source: Pew Research Center · 2025-06-02 · Reviewed: 2026-10-09

Fertility and family policy: research and source notes

Trott Bailey Family target and observed fertility The 5.0-children-per-woman target is an authored civilization benchmark; approximately 2.1 children per woman is the usual long-run replacement benchmark. The existing Family Formation method blends 60% lived family conditions and 40% measured fertility performance.

How policy is evaluated Assess housing, care, parental time, material security, access to family formation, and actual demographic outcomes. A government statement or law is not proof that national births increased or declined. Establish its effects with dated comparative evidence before assigning points.

How the two kinds of evidence differ The binary legal-status deduction is an authored TBF policy assessment, not a statistic of observed births. Carroll and Schumm argue that marriage-law changes can weaken procreative norms, while other empirical studies find no negative effect on different-sex family formation. This disagreement is disclosed rather than presented as scientific consensus.

Independent research OECD fertility trends (2024) · UN population projections (2024) · Peer-reviewed family-formation study (2015) · Carroll & Schumm — The Fall of Fertility (2016/2017) · Public Discourse (2015).

Trott Bailey Family thinking Courtship, Marriage & Married Life · Official Core World View · No Shrugging at Family Suffering.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | family-formation-stability | beleshky 4

For Sweden, return / Continuity — family life sustained: Family leave returns significant childcare time, but population fertility is below replacement. Category context: Parent benefit provides 480 paid days per child, but housing and paid essentials remain substantial burdens. SCB 2025 total fertility is 1.423; the authored 60% family-environment/40% fertility method is used.

2026-10-22 Swedish Social Insurance Agency and Statistics Sweden 2025
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | family-formation-stability | beleshky 3

For Sweden, friction — what makes family life difficult: Housing costs and family work burdens remain despite parental benefits. Category context: Parent benefit provides 480 paid days per child, but housing and paid essentials remain substantial burdens. SCB 2025 total fertility is 1.423; the authored 60% family-environment/40% fertility method is used.

2026-10-22 Swedish Social Insurance Agency and Statistics Sweden 2025
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | family-formation-stability | beleshky 2

For Sweden, reach — actual family & child access: Many eligible parents receive support, but suitable housing and full free provision are incomplete. Category context: Parent benefit provides 480 paid days per child, but housing and paid essentials remain substantial burdens. SCB 2025 total fertility is 1.423; the authored 60% family-environment/40% fertility method is used.

2026-10-22 Swedish Social Insurance Agency and Statistics Sweden 2025
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | family-formation-stability | beleshky 1

For Sweden, capacity — family establishment & care: Existing maternity, childcare and paid family-leave institutions are strong. Category context: Parent benefit provides 480 paid days per child, but housing and paid essentials remain substantial burdens. SCB 2025 total fertility is 1.423; the authored 60% family-environment/40% fertility method is used.

2026-10-22 Swedish Social Insurance Agency and Statistics Sweden 2025
Family Formation, Continuity & Child Stability

For Sweden, strong family services coexist with housing/care cost pressures. The 2025 TFR of 1.42 is below replacement and far below the TBF 5.0 target. Observed TFR 1.420 (2025) is below replacement and below the TBF target of 5.0.

Statistics Sweden — Population statistics 2025

Published indicators

Total fertility rate1.42 births per woman

Statistics Sweden — Population statistics 2025 · 2025

Source
5% weight Land Access & Spatial Freedom
-60.3↓

Money-gated · Evidence +18.8

Score breakdown

Land Access & Spatial Freedom

-60.3Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Land Capacity levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-49.8× 25%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 12.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -49.8 × 25% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Sweden, capacity: Recorded tenure, planning and some usable land remain available. Category context: Recorded and regulated tenure exists alongside housing and land markets; no general right to receive a free inheritable 50-hectare family compound was identified. Boverket shows substantial municipal housing land-access pressure.

For Sweden, land is well governed but ordinary households must still buy or rent access; high-demand areas are expensive and spatial freedom is constrained.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Land Reach levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 35%= -20.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

The recorded value corresponds to a Reach-ladder step. The country evidence explains its practical access conditions.

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

Linked direct Money Gate: Housing / Land 0.75/4 recorded; gate-specific recorded. Physical reach can exist with paid access. Free-access Reach tiers must agree with this gate’s independently sourced no-payment population assessment. 4/4 is now reserved for reliable, accessible, universally free access. Neither score is copied blindly from the other.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

25.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Sweden, reach: Secure land use often depends on market income; no universal free family land route. Category context: Recorded and regulated tenure exists alongside housing and land markets; no general right to receive a free inheritable 50-hectare family compound was identified. Boverket shows substantial municipal housing land-access pressure.

🤔
Friction / Concentration 25%
See all nine Land Friction / Concentration levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-74.9× 25%= -18.7 points
Exact point calculation

-25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = -6.25 weighted points

Original evidence -25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation -25.0; Money-gated reading -74.9 × 25% = -18.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, friction / Concentration: Price, planning, location and housing shortage constrain acquisition. Category context: Recorded and regulated tenure exists alongside housing and land markets; no general right to receive a free inheritable 50-hectare family compound was identified. Boverket shows substantial municipal housing land-access pressure.

🤔
Return / Productive Ground 15%
See all nine Land Return / Productive Ground levels, the shared Housing/Land gate and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 15%= -8.7 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 15% = -8.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, return / Productive Ground: Gardens and land stewardship are possible, though not universally allocated. Category context: Recorded and regulated tenure exists alongside housing and land markets; no general right to receive a free inheritable 50-hectare family compound was identified. Boverket shows substantial municipal housing land-access pressure.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.46 + -20.37 + -18.73 + -8.74 = -60.3

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +18.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +18.8. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -60.3.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+18.8 Original evidence category score+18.8 Contribution to national evidence score+0.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 12.50 + 8.75 + -6.25 + 3.75 = 18.75

Base: 18.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +18.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 18.75 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 0.94 points

For Sweden, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes +0.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | land-spatial-freedom | beleshky 4

For Sweden, return / Productive Ground: Gardens and land stewardship are possible, though not universally allocated. Category context: Recorded and regulated tenure exists alongside housing and land markets; no general right to receive a free inheritable 50-hectare family compound was identified. Boverket shows substantial municipal housing land-access pressure.

2026-10-22 Boverket Housing Market Survey 2026
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | land-spatial-freedom | beleshky 3

For Sweden, friction / Concentration: Price, planning, location and housing shortage constrain acquisition. Category context: Recorded and regulated tenure exists alongside housing and land markets; no general right to receive a free inheritable 50-hectare family compound was identified. Boverket shows substantial municipal housing land-access pressure.

2026-10-22 Boverket Housing Market Survey 2026
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | land-spatial-freedom | beleshky 2

For Sweden, reach: Secure land use often depends on market income; no universal free family land route. Category context: Recorded and regulated tenure exists alongside housing and land markets; no general right to receive a free inheritable 50-hectare family compound was identified. Boverket shows substantial municipal housing land-access pressure.

2026-10-22 Boverket Housing Market Survey 2026
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | land-spatial-freedom | beleshky 1

For Sweden, capacity: Recorded tenure, planning and some usable land remain available. Category context: Recorded and regulated tenure exists alongside housing and land markets; no general right to receive a free inheritable 50-hectare family compound was identified. Boverket shows substantial municipal housing land-access pressure.

2026-10-22 Boverket Housing Market Survey 2026
Land Access & Spatial Freedom

For Sweden, land is well governed but ordinary households must still buy or rent access; high-demand areas are expensive and spatial freedom is constrained.

Boverket — Housing Market Survey 2026
6% weight Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight
-49.9↓

Money-gated · Evidence +50.0

Score breakdown

Peace of Mind, Happiness, Beauty & Delight

-49.9Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Capacity levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-41.5× 25%= -10.4 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -41.5 × 25% = -10.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

Capacity: Parks, cultural services and outdoor opportunities are broadly available. Category context: Sweden has broad parks, nature and cultural provision; OECD environmental review documents strengths but also unmet biodiversity objectives, limiting claims of universal usable restorative access.

For Sweden, public nature, safety, culture and recreation create strong everyday delight reach, though many organized activities remain paid.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Reach levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-49.8× 35%= -17.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -49.8 × 35% = -17.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

Reach: Many enjoy nature and public space, but not all households have equal effective access. Category context: Sweden has broad parks, nature and cultural provision; OECD environmental review documents strengths but also unmet biodiversity objectives, limiting claims of universal usable restorative access.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Friction levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 25%= -14.6 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 6.25 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 25% = -14.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Friction: Free parks reduce access friction but travel and maintenance barriers still occur. Category context: Sweden has broad parks, nature and cultural provision; OECD environmental review documents strengths but also unmet biodiversity objectives, limiting claims of universal usable restorative access.

🤔
Return / Delight 15%
See all nine Peace & Beauty Return / Delight levels, public-life access and how to improve ↗
-49.8× 15%= -7.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -49.8 × 15% = -7.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

Return / Delight: Documented culture and open space create real restoration opportunities. Category context: Sweden has broad parks, nature and cultural provision; OECD environmental review documents strengths but also unmet biodiversity objectives, limiting claims of universal usable restorative access.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.37 + -17.45 + -14.55 + -7.48 = -49.9

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +50.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +50.0. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -49.9.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+50.0 Original evidence category score+50.0 Contribution to national evidence score+3.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 17.50 + 6.25 + 7.50 = 50.00

Base: 50.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +50.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 50.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 3.00 points

For Sweden, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes +3.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | peace-beauty-delight | beleshky 4

Return / Delight: Documented culture and open space create real restoration opportunities. Category context: Sweden has broad parks, nature and cultural provision; OECD environmental review documents strengths but also unmet biodiversity objectives, limiting claims of universal usable restorative access.

2026-10-22 OECD Environmental Performance Review Sweden 2025
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | peace-beauty-delight | beleshky 3

Friction: Free parks reduce access friction but travel and maintenance barriers still occur. Category context: Sweden has broad parks, nature and cultural provision; OECD environmental review documents strengths but also unmet biodiversity objectives, limiting claims of universal usable restorative access.

2026-10-22 OECD Environmental Performance Review Sweden 2025
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | peace-beauty-delight | beleshky 2

Reach: Many enjoy nature and public space, but not all households have equal effective access. Category context: Sweden has broad parks, nature and cultural provision; OECD environmental review documents strengths but also unmet biodiversity objectives, limiting claims of universal usable restorative access.

2026-10-22 OECD Environmental Performance Review Sweden 2025
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | peace-beauty-delight | beleshky 1

Capacity: Parks, cultural services and outdoor opportunities are broadly available. Category context: Sweden has broad parks, nature and cultural provision; OECD environmental review documents strengths but also unmet biodiversity objectives, limiting claims of universal usable restorative access.

2026-10-22 OECD Environmental Performance Review Sweden 2025
6% weight Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience
-56.1↓

Money-gated · Evidence +31.3

Score breakdown

Living Ground, Biodiversity & Resilience

-56.1Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Living Ground Capacity levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-41.5× 25%= -10.4 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -41.5 × 25% = -10.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Sweden, capacity: Large forests and environmental agencies maintain significant capacity. Category context: Large forests and environmental programs provide extensive biological capacity, but OECD 2025 says 12 of 16 national environmental quality goals are unlikely to be met by 2030.

For Sweden, strong environmental governance and restoration capacity coexist with consumption-based ecological burdens.

🤔
Reach / Ecological Function 35%
See all nine Living Ground Reach / Ecological Function levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 35%= -20.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

25.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Sweden, reach / Ecological Function: Ecological function is substantial but many stated national goals are off track. Category context: Large forests and environmental programs provide extensive biological capacity, but OECD 2025 says 12 of 16 national environmental quality goals are unlikely to be met by 2030.

🤔
Friction / Loss 25%
See all nine Living Ground Friction / Loss levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-66.6× 25%= -16.6 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -66.6 × 25% = -16.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, friction / Loss: Habitat pressure and material throughput continue despite protection. Category context: Large forests and environmental programs provide extensive biological capacity, but OECD 2025 says 12 of 16 national environmental quality goals are unlikely to be met by 2030.

🤔
Return / Regeneration 15%
See all nine Living Ground Return / Regeneration levels, ecological evidence and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 15%= -8.7 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 15% = -8.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, return / Regeneration: Programs maintain/regenerate some ecosystems, with unfinished restoration. Category context: Large forests and environmental programs provide extensive biological capacity, but OECD 2025 says 12 of 16 national environmental quality goals are unlikely to be met by 2030.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.37 + -20.37 + -16.64 + -8.74 = -56.1

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +31.3. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +31.3. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -56.1.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+31.3 Original evidence category score+31.3 Contribution to national evidence score+1.9
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 8.75 + 0.00 + 3.75 = 31.25

Base: 31.25 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +31.3 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 31.25 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.88 points

For Sweden, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.9 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +50.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | living-ground-resilience | beleshky 4

For Sweden, return / Regeneration: Programs maintain/regenerate some ecosystems, with unfinished restoration. Category context: Large forests and environmental programs provide extensive biological capacity, but OECD 2025 says 12 of 16 national environmental quality goals are unlikely to be met by 2030.

2026-10-22 OECD Environmental Performance Review Sweden 2025
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | living-ground-resilience | beleshky 3

For Sweden, friction / Loss: Habitat pressure and material throughput continue despite protection. Category context: Large forests and environmental programs provide extensive biological capacity, but OECD 2025 says 12 of 16 national environmental quality goals are unlikely to be met by 2030.

2026-10-22 OECD Environmental Performance Review Sweden 2025
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | living-ground-resilience | beleshky 2

For Sweden, reach / Ecological Function: Ecological function is substantial but many stated national goals are off track. Category context: Large forests and environmental programs provide extensive biological capacity, but OECD 2025 says 12 of 16 national environmental quality goals are unlikely to be met by 2030.

2026-10-22 OECD Environmental Performance Review Sweden 2025
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | living-ground-resilience | beleshky 1

For Sweden, capacity: Large forests and environmental agencies maintain significant capacity. Category context: Large forests and environmental programs provide extensive biological capacity, but OECD 2025 says 12 of 16 national environmental quality goals are unlikely to be met by 2030.

2026-10-22 OECD Environmental Performance Review Sweden 2025
5% weight Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction
-53.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +40.0

Score breakdown

Justice, Safety & Institutional Friction

-53.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Capacity levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-41.5× 25%= -10.4 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -41.5 × 25% = -10.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Sweden, capacity: Functional courts, rule systems and civil registration are established. Category context: Established accessible courts and administrative protections support functioning remedies; evidence does not establish rapid free complete nationwide remedies and same-day access under the TBF benchmark.

For Sweden, rule-of-law capacity is strong, but administrative, housing and service queues still impose lived friction.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Justice & Safety Reach levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-49.8× 35%= -17.5 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

50.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 17.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -49.8 × 35% = -17.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Sweden, reach: Broad formal rights and remedies; full low-cost practical reach is not measured here. Category context: Established accessible courts and administrative protections support functioning remedies; evidence does not establish rapid free complete nationwide remedies and same-day access under the TBF benchmark.

🤔
Friction 25%
See all nine Justice & Safety Friction levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-66.6× 25%= -16.6 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -66.6 × 25% = -16.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, friction: Administrative delays, cost and procedural burdens are not eliminated nationwide. Category context: Established accessible courts and administrative protections support functioning remedies; evidence does not establish rapid free complete nationwide remedies and same-day access under the TBF benchmark.

🤔
Return / Reliability 15%
See all nine Justice & Safety Return / Reliability levels, evidence requirements and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 15%= -8.7 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 15% = -8.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, return / Reliability: Enforceable decisions and accountability function but are not frictionless. Category context: Established accessible courts and administrative protections support functioning remedies; evidence does not establish rapid free complete nationwide remedies and same-day access under the TBF benchmark.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.37 + -17.45 + -16.64 + -8.73 = -53.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +40.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +40.0. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -53.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+40.0 Original evidence category score+40.0 Contribution to national evidence score+2.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 17.50 + 0.00 + 3.75 = 40.00

Base: 40.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +40.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 40.00 × (5.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 2.00 points

For Sweden, this category carries 5% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 5.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | justice-safety-friction | beleshky 4

For Sweden, return / Reliability: Enforceable decisions and accountability function but are not frictionless. Category context: Established accessible courts and administrative protections support functioning remedies; evidence does not establish rapid free complete nationwide remedies and same-day access under the TBF benchmark.

2026-10-22 Swedish Government Child Protection overview
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | justice-safety-friction | beleshky 3

For Sweden, friction: Administrative delays, cost and procedural burdens are not eliminated nationwide. Category context: Established accessible courts and administrative protections support functioning remedies; evidence does not establish rapid free complete nationwide remedies and same-day access under the TBF benchmark.

2026-10-22 Swedish Government Child Protection overview
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | justice-safety-friction | beleshky 2

For Sweden, reach: Broad formal rights and remedies; full low-cost practical reach is not measured here. Category context: Established accessible courts and administrative protections support functioning remedies; evidence does not establish rapid free complete nationwide remedies and same-day access under the TBF benchmark.

2026-10-22 Swedish Government Child Protection overview
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | justice-safety-friction | beleshky 1

For Sweden, capacity: Functional courts, rule systems and civil registration are established. Category context: Established accessible courts and administrative protections support functioning remedies; evidence does not establish rapid free complete nationwide remedies and same-day access under the TBF benchmark.

2026-10-22 Swedish Government Child Protection overview
4% weight Durability, Repair & Material Return
-58.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +25.0

Score breakdown

Durability, Repair & Material Return

-58.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Capacity 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Capacity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.8× 25%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 12.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -49.8 × 25% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Capacity rate, when evidenced = usable functioning capacity ÷ capacity needed × 100. A derived score requires separate documented judgement; do not assume the rate itself equals the score.

Why this score

For Sweden, capacity: Collection, sorting, waste-energy and repair capacity exist. Category context: OECD 2025 records low landfill reliance but majority incineration with energy recovery, failure to meet the 2020 50% recycling target, and circular material-use rate of about 6%.

For Sweden, repair/recycling systems are mature and regeneration investment is strong, while repairs and replacements remain money-gated.

🤔
Reach 35%
See all nine Durability & Repair Reach scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 35%= -20.4 points
Reach · 25-point ladder & linked Money Gate

Domestic Reach has eight 25-point intervals and nine anchors: −100, −75, −50, −25, 0, +25, +50, +75, +100. Existing readings retain their recorded scoring basis.

The transportation thresholds establish the 25-point reference scale, with category-specific evidence determining the Reach reading.

Exact point calculation

25.00 × (35.00 ÷ 100) = 8.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 35% = -20.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Reach rate, when evidenced = people effectively served ÷ eligible people × 100. Check the same population, period and location.

Why this score

For Sweden, reach: Most access waste collection, but free local repair and reuse is not broadly documented. Category context: OECD 2025 records low landfill reliance but majority incineration with energy recovery, failure to meet the 2020 50% recycling target, and circular material-use rate of about 6%.

🤔
Friction / Waste 25%
See all nine Durability & Repair Friction / Waste scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-66.6× 25%= -16.6 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -66.6 × 25% = -16.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, friction / Waste: Low landfill masks incineration and continued consumption/waste costs. Category context: OECD 2025 records low landfill reliance but majority incineration with energy recovery, failure to meet the 2020 50% recycling target, and circular material-use rate of about 6%.

🤔
Return / Circularity 15%
See all nine Durability & Repair Return / Circularity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 15%= -8.7 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (15.00 ÷ 100) = 3.75 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 15% = -8.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, return / Circularity: Some energy recovery and repair; low circular-use rate weakens repeated reuse. Category context: OECD 2025 records low landfill reliance but majority incineration with energy recovery, failure to meet the 2020 50% recycling target, and circular material-use rate of about 6%.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.46 + -20.37 + -16.64 + -8.74 = -58.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +25.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +25.0. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+25.0 Original evidence category score+25.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.0
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 12.50 + 8.75 + 0.00 + 3.75 = 25.00

Base: 25.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +25.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 25.00 × (4.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.00 points

For Sweden, this category carries 4% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 4.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.0 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

Abundance Gap: +25.0

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | durability-material-return | beleshky 4

For Sweden, return / Circularity: Some energy recovery and repair; low circular-use rate weakens repeated reuse. Category context: OECD 2025 records low landfill reliance but majority incineration with energy recovery, failure to meet the 2020 50% recycling target, and circular material-use rate of about 6%.

2026-10-22 OECD Environmental Performance Review Sweden 2025
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | durability-material-return | beleshky 3

For Sweden, friction / Waste: Low landfill masks incineration and continued consumption/waste costs. Category context: OECD 2025 records low landfill reliance but majority incineration with energy recovery, failure to meet the 2020 50% recycling target, and circular material-use rate of about 6%.

2026-10-22 OECD Environmental Performance Review Sweden 2025
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | durability-material-return | beleshky 2

For Sweden, reach: Most access waste collection, but free local repair and reuse is not broadly documented. Category context: OECD 2025 records low landfill reliance but majority incineration with energy recovery, failure to meet the 2020 50% recycling target, and circular material-use rate of about 6%.

2026-10-22 OECD Environmental Performance Review Sweden 2025
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | durability-material-return | beleshky 1

For Sweden, capacity: Collection, sorting, waste-energy and repair capacity exist. Category context: OECD 2025 records low landfill reliance but majority incineration with energy recovery, failure to meet the 2020 50% recycling target, and circular material-use rate of about 6%.

2026-10-22 OECD Environmental Performance Review Sweden 2025
6% weight International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome
-58.2↓

Money-gated · Evidence +25.0

International score breakdown

International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

-58.2Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Entry Accessibility 25%
See all nine International Welcome Entry Accessibility scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-49.8× 25%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 12.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -49.8 × 25% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, entry Accessibility: Structured entry and family/residence routes exist. Category context: The Swedish Migration Agency documents 88,938 residence permits in 2025 and substantial family/protection routes; income-based work-permit rules and asylum procedures remain barriers.

Sweden has substantial legal migration/protection routes, but 2026 changes lengthened citizenship residence and narrowed permanent residence for some protection routes.

🤔
Migrant Practical Life 30%
See all nine International Welcome Migrant Practical Life scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 30%= -17.5 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 30% = -17.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, migrant Practical Life: Newcomers may access work/care, with eligibility and income conditions. Category context: The Swedish Migration Agency documents 88,938 residence permits in 2025 and substantial family/protection routes; income-based work-permit rules and asylum procedures remain barriers.

🤔
Refugee / Neighbour Welcome 25%
See all nine International Welcome Refugee / Neighbour Welcome scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-66.6× 25%= -16.6 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -66.6 × 25% = -16.6 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, refugee / Neighbour Welcome: Protection applications are handled, but waiting and legal status conditions remain. Category context: The Swedish Migration Agency documents 88,938 residence permits in 2025 and substantial family/protection routes; income-based work-permit rules and asylum procedures remain barriers.

🤔
Flexibility / Continuity 20%
See all nine International Welcome Flexibility / Continuity scoring levels and how to improve ↗
-58.2× 20%= -11.7 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 5.00 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 20% = -11.7 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, flexibility / Continuity: Some family reunification, protection and long-term routes exist. Category context: The Swedish Migration Agency documents 88,938 residence permits in 2025 and substantial family/protection routes; income-based work-permit rules and asylum procedures remain barriers.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -12.46 + -17.46 + -16.64 + -11.65 = -58.2

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +25.0. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +25.0. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -58.2.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+25.0 Original evidence category score+25.0 Contribution to national evidence score+1.5
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 12.50 + 7.50 + 0.00 + 5.00 = 25.00

Base: 25.00 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +25.0 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 25.00 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 1.50 points

For Sweden, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes +1.5 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | international-access-human-welcome | beleshky 4

For Sweden, flexibility / Continuity: Some family reunification, protection and long-term routes exist. Category context: The Swedish Migration Agency documents 88,938 residence permits in 2025 and substantial family/protection routes; income-based work-permit rules and asylum procedures remain barriers.

2026-10-22 Swedish Migration Agency permit statistics
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | international-access-human-welcome | beleshky 3

For Sweden, refugee / Neighbour Welcome: Protection applications are handled, but waiting and legal status conditions remain. Category context: The Swedish Migration Agency documents 88,938 residence permits in 2025 and substantial family/protection routes; income-based work-permit rules and asylum procedures remain barriers.

2026-10-22 Swedish Migration Agency permit statistics
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | international-access-human-welcome | beleshky 2

For Sweden, migrant Practical Life: Newcomers may access work/care, with eligibility and income conditions. Category context: The Swedish Migration Agency documents 88,938 residence permits in 2025 and substantial family/protection routes; income-based work-permit rules and asylum procedures remain barriers.

2026-10-22 Swedish Migration Agency permit statistics
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | international-access-human-welcome | beleshky 1

For Sweden, entry Accessibility: Structured entry and family/residence routes exist. Category context: The Swedish Migration Agency documents 88,938 residence permits in 2025 and substantial family/protection routes; income-based work-permit rules and asylum procedures remain barriers.

2026-10-22 Swedish Migration Agency permit statistics
International Accessibility, Migration & Human Welcome

Sweden has substantial legal migration/protection routes, but 2026 changes lengthened citizenship residence and narrowed permanent residence for some protection routes.

Swedish Migration Agency — citizenship rules 2026
6% weight External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct
-53.6↓

Money-gated · Evidence +38.8

International score breakdown

External Footprint & Non-Extractive Global Conduct

-53.6Four beleshkies · Money-gated
Useful Contribution Abroad 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-41.5× 25%= -10.4 points
Exact point calculation

75.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 18.75 weighted points

Original evidence +75.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +75.0; Money-gated reading -41.5 × 25% = -10.4 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, useful Contribution Abroad: Substantial documented ODA supports multiple receiving regions. Category context: OECD reports 2025 ODA of USD 6 billion (0.85% of GNI), a strong measurable benefit. This alone does not verify all recipient-side capability, external material flows or harm-and-repair outcomes.

Large humanitarian contributions are a strong positive external contribution, counterweighted by Sweden’s consumption-linked environmental footprint.

🤔
Mutual Benefit Retained 25%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-49.8× 25%= -12.5 points
Exact point calculation

50.00 × (25.00 ÷ 100) = 12.50 weighted points

Original evidence +50.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +50.0; Money-gated reading -49.8 × 25% = -12.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, mutual Benefit Retained Locally: Some partner capacity and grants persist; recipient-side maintenance evidence is limited. Category context: OECD reports 2025 ODA of USD 6 billion (0.85% of GNI), a strong measurable benefit. This alone does not verify all recipient-side capability, external material flows or harm-and-repair outcomes.

🤔
Other Harm & Repair 20%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-66.6× 20%= -13.3 points
Exact point calculation

0.00 × (20.00 ÷ 100) = 0.00 weighted points

Original evidence 0.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation 0.0; Money-gated reading -66.6 × 20% = -13.3 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, other External Harm & Repair: Outward benefit cannot substitute for tracking extraction, waste and repairs. Category context: OECD reports 2025 ODA of USD 6 billion (0.85% of GNI), a strong measurable benefit. This alone does not verify all recipient-side capability, external material flows or harm-and-repair outcomes.

🤔
Material Transfers (export/import roles) 30%
Explore External Footprint scoring levels, including the v3.1 weight and historic-score differences ↗
-58.2× 30%= -17.5 points
Exact point calculation

25.00 × (30.00 ÷ 100) = 7.50 weighted points

Original evidence +25.0; after proportional category-adjustment allocation +25.0; Money-gated reading -58.2 × 30% = -17.5 points. Original evidence and the adjustment stay separately identifiable.

Use the cited country-specific record to explain why this rail earned its points.

Why this score

For Sweden, garbage & Low-Utility Material Transfers: Material export and import safety require destination-side assessment; no universal no-harm proof. Category context: OECD reports 2025 ODA of USD 6 billion (0.85% of GNI), a strong measurable benefit. This alone does not verify all recipient-side capability, external material flows or harm-and-repair outcomes.

For Sweden, 2024 Swedish plastic scrap imports 179.48m kg, including 116.14m kg from Norway. Processing capability does not erase imported material burden.

For Sweden, 2024 Swedish plastic scrap exports 122.61m kg, mostly Germany, Lithuania and Netherlands.

For Sweden, exporter -30 (15%); importer -40 (15%). Export evidence: 2024 Swedish plastic scrap exports 122.61m kg, mostly Germany, Lithuania and Netherlands. Import evidence: 2024 Swedish plastic scrap imports 179.48m kg, including 116.14m kg from Norway. Processing capability does not erase imported material burden.. Plastics HS3915 is not all waste and transferred recyclable material is not presumed illegal dumping.

🤔
Money-gated beleshky contributions -10.37 + -12.46 + -13.31 + -17.47 = -53.6

The Money Gate is already included in the four readings. No second ceiling is deducted from this category. Displayed contributions are reconciled to two decimal places.

Adjustment and Money Gate arithmetic

Original weighted evidence: +38.8. Category adjustments (research, Adoption, family and/or transfer): 0.0. Effective evidence: +38.8. Money Gate ceiling: -33.1. Four Money-gated beleshky contributions total: -53.6.

The adjustment is distributed within beleshky score limits. The original 64 evidence readings are preserved for research review.

Weighted rail subtotal+38.8 Original evidence category score+38.8 Contribution to national evidence score+2.3
Show the full category score calculation

Weighted rails: 18.75 + 12.50 + 0.00 + 7.50 = 38.75

Base: 38.75 · reviewed adjustment: 0.00 · Adoption: +0.00 · authored marriage-law deduction: −0.00 · verified transfer deduction: −0.00 = published +38.8 (clamped to −100..+100)

Contribution to national evidence: 38.75 × (6.00 × 100.00%) ÷ 100.00 = 2.33 points

Material transfers: scored in International Footprint

Exporter responsibility: -30.00/100 (15% of footprint); importer responsibility: -40.00/100 (15% of footprint). Material movement is a real workload; these are TBF authored judgments, not certified illegal dumping estimates. Each role is included ONCE in the Footprint 3.1 published score.

Exported waste / garbageRole: -30.00/100 · scored
Exported low-utility goods / disguised dumpingRole: -30.00/100 · scored
Accepted imported garbageRole: -40.00/100 · scored
Accepted low-utility dumpingRole: -40.00/100 · scored

The material-transfer burden already affects the published score. Facility-specific downstream harm remains a separate research claim. No second penalty is added for the same trade.

For Sweden, this category carries 6% of the scorecard. With 100% research coverage in this category, its effective researched weight is 6.00%. After normalization across Sweden’s researched categories, this category contributes +2.3 points to the national Evidence-before-Gate reading.

What the evidence found

2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | external-footprint-non-extractive | beleshky 4

For Sweden, garbage & Low-Utility Material Transfers: Material export and import safety require destination-side assessment; no universal no-harm proof. Category context: OECD reports 2025 ODA of USD 6 billion (0.85% of GNI), a strong measurable benefit. This alone does not verify all recipient-side capability, external material flows or harm-and-repair outcomes.

2026-10-22 OECD Development Co-operation Profiles Sweden 2026
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | external-footprint-non-extractive | beleshky 3

For Sweden, other External Harm & Repair: Outward benefit cannot substitute for tracking extraction, waste and repairs. Category context: OECD reports 2025 ODA of USD 6 billion (0.85% of GNI), a strong measurable benefit. This alone does not verify all recipient-side capability, external material flows or harm-and-repair outcomes.

2026-10-22 OECD Development Co-operation Profiles Sweden 2026
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | external-footprint-non-extractive | beleshky 2

For Sweden, mutual Benefit Retained Locally: Some partner capacity and grants persist; recipient-side maintenance evidence is limited. Category context: OECD reports 2025 ODA of USD 6 billion (0.85% of GNI), a strong measurable benefit. This alone does not verify all recipient-side capability, external material flows or harm-and-repair outcomes.

2026-10-22 OECD Development Co-operation Profiles Sweden 2026
2026-10-22 Sweden scored reaudit | external-footprint-non-extractive | beleshky 1

For Sweden, useful Contribution Abroad: Substantial documented ODA supports multiple receiving regions. Category context: OECD reports 2025 ODA of USD 6 billion (0.85% of GNI), a strong measurable benefit. This alone does not verify all recipient-side capability, external material flows or harm-and-repair outcomes.

2026-10-22 OECD Development Co-operation Profiles Sweden 2026
Sweden | importer material conduct -40

For Sweden, 2024 Swedish plastic scrap imports 179.48m kg, including 116.14m kg from Norway. Processing capability does not erase imported material burden.

2024-12-31 WITS/UN Comtrade and official trade context
Sweden | exporter material conduct -30

For Sweden, 2024 Swedish plastic scrap exports 122.61m kg, mostly Germany, Lithuania and Netherlands.

2024-12-31 WITS/UN Comtrade
Footprint 3.1 | Sweden | materials weighted -35.0

For Sweden, exporter -30 (15%); importer -40 (15%). Export evidence: 2024 Swedish plastic scrap exports 122.61m kg, mostly Germany, Lithuania and Netherlands. Import evidence: 2024 Swedish plastic scrap imports 179.48m kg, including 116.14m kg from Norway. Processing capability does not erase imported material burden.. Plastics HS3915 is not all waste and transferred recyclable material is not presumed illegal dumping.

2024-12-31 WITS/UN Comtrade and national labour/environment evidence

Trott Bailey Family Civilization Target

The end state: life beyond monetary gatekeeping

Trott Bailey Family Civilization treats money as an exchange tool rather than a prerequisite for access to life. The long-run abundance target is that food, water, shelter, care, education, mobility, land access and ordinary public life remain reachable even when a person cannot pay.

This target is an authored civilization standard. The diagnostic evidence score can use all sixteen weighted categories: fourteen domestic plus International Welcome (6%) and External Footprint (6%), when each international category has four verified rail scores and dated source evidence. Unreviewed international rails remain pending, not zero. The five-part Money Gate remains a separate domestic threshold asking whether food, housing/land, healthcare, transportation and water/energy are genuinely reachable without payment before any civilization can cross zero.